Passive Detection and Localization of Transient Signals from Marine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Passive Detection and Localization of Transient Signals from Marine PassiveDetection andLocalization ofTransient Signals from Marine Mammals usingWidely SpacedBottom Mounted Hydrophonesin Open Ocean Environments Susan 3arvis and David Moretti NavalUndersea Warfare Center Division NewportEngineering,Test and EvaluationDepartment 1'I 76 Howell St., Newport, R.l. 02841-1708 Abstract Oneobjective of the MarineMammal Monitoring on NavyRanges project is to useexisting Navy undersearange infrastructure to develop a toolset for passivedetection and localization of marine mammals.The Office of NavalResearch funded the M3Rproject as part of the Navy'seffort to deter- mine the effects of acoustic emissionson marine mammalsand threatened/ endangeredspecies. A necessaryfirst step in this effort is the creationof a baselineof behaviorwhich requires long-term monitoringof marinemammals. Such monitoring, in turn, requiresthe abilityto detectand localize the animals,This paper will present algorithms for passivedetection and localizationof transient signalsdeveloped as part of the M3Rtoolset. It wiII also present results of the application of these tools to detection and tracking of various toothed whales at the Atlantic UnderseaTest and Evaluation Center AUTEC!, Andros Island, Bahamas. Introduction Navy undersearanges such as the Atlantic UnderseaTest and EvaiuationCenter AUTEC!use arrays of widely spaced bottom mounted hydrophonesto acousticallytrack underseaand surfacevehicles. Traditionally,the vehiclesare equipped with acousticpingers that emit knownidentification signals at knownrepetition rates. Increasingly, range instrumentation infrastructure Figure 1! is being appliedto non-traditionaltracking problems, The Marine Mammal Monitoring on NavyUndersea Ranges M3R!program has developed a set of signal processingtools to detect and track marine mammalsusing Navy range facilities [11. Under the M3Rprogram, algorithms were developed to automatically detect and track two classes of whale vocalizations clicks and whisties. Both of these classesof signals are transient in nature. The tool set was recently tested at AUTECover a two- weekperiod. Over five hundredsquare nautical miles of oceanwere simultaneously monitored via 68 broad-bandhydrophones. Several species of toothedwhales where automatically detected and trackedin real-time.The positionalaccuracy of the M3Rtracking tools was confirmed by visual sightings by a surfacecraft and by manual analysisof the hydrophone data. Proceedingsfrom the international workshop on the Applications of PassiveAcoustics to Fisheries 123 Discussion Visualsightings [2] and auralanalysis of hydrophonerecordings [3] indicatethat manyspecies of toothed whalesare presentat AUTEC.The mostcommonly seen and heardare spermwhales, dol- phinsand short finned pilot whales,all of whichare present nearly year round. Consequently,the M3Rtools weredeveloped to detect and trackthese common species. For purposes of algorithm development, the vocaiizations produced by the whales were characterizedas clicks and whistles. Clicksare, in general,any impulsive,broad-band signal. However, sperm whale clicks were of partic- ular interest.Sperm whale clicks are very distinct,have high sourcelevel, and occurin regularpat- terns [4] or "clicktrains" Figure2!, Whistles were more broadly defined as any narrowbandevent that sweepsin frequencyover time Figure3!. Thereare three distinct partsto the whale localizationproblem. First the vocalizationsor whale callsmust be automaticallydetected. In orderto determinethe positionof the animalin three dimensions,a givencall mustbe detectedon a minimumof four hydrophones.The second part of the problemis the associationof the detectionsreceived on varioushydrophones with eachother. Thatis, one must be able to determinethat the call received on hydrophone A at time tA is the samesignal that wasreceived by hydrophone B attime tB. Finally, associated sets of arrivaltimes areinput into a multilaterationalgorithm to solvefor position.A three-dimensionalhyperbolic posi- tioning model [5] is usedto determinethe vocalizinganimal's location in X,Y, and Z aswell asthe time of emission of the call. M3Remploys a real-timefrequency domain energy detector for whalecall detection. A spectrogram of the incomingacoustic data from each of thehydrophones isformed using 512-point fast Fourier transforms FFT! with a rectangularwindow and fifty percentoverlap. The resultant spectrogram hasa frequencyresolution of approximately51 Hzand a timeresolution of approximately9.8 ms. Eachtime-frequency bin of the spectrogramis comparedto a timevarying threshold, D f t!. The thresholdis set to be m dBabove the time! averagepower within frequencybin f.The output of the detector,Q~ t!,f for eachhydrophone, is a binaryvalued "detection spectrogram" which contains a 1 in eachtime-frequency bin that exceededD f t! anda 0everywhere else Figure4!. The detection spectrogramindicates, in real-time,the presenceof whalevocalizations as well asproviding infor- mationon their frequencycontent. As evidentin Figures2 and3, the signalstructure of sperm whale!clicks is very differentfrom the signalstructure of whistles.Therefore, separate detection associationalgorithms were developed for eachsignal type. A seriesof clicks from a single sperm whale exhibits nearly the same inter-click interval on ail receiv- ing hydrophones.Calls from eachadditional animal exhibit their own uniquepattern. In fact,inter- clickinterval patterns were found to be an effectivemeans of both differentiatingbetween individ- ualwhales and associatingpatterns of detectionsamong hydrophones [6]. In the first stepof the M3Rclick association algorithm the time-frequencydetection spectra from all hydrophoneswere reduced to binary "click maps".Click maps contain a 1 for time indices where broad band events occurredin the detectionspectrum and 0 forall other times Figure 5!. Conceptually,the next step is to crosscorrelate the clickmaps from severalhydrophones with a masterhydrophone to Findthe difference in time of arrival between each hydrophone and the master. However,care must be Proceedingsfrom the international Workshop on the Applications of PassiveAcovstics to Rsheries 124 taken in implementing the crosscorrelation in order to properly associateeach click detection amongthe hydrophones.Figure 6a showsan exampleof a clickmap from a singlehydrophone containingclicks from two individuals,Figure 6b showsthe clickmap from a secondhydrophone overthe sametime period.The question is which clicksin figure6b belongto whichindividual? TheM3R click association algorithm uses the notionof a "scanningsieve" [7] to matchdetection pat- ternsbetween hydrophones. The sequence of cilickdetections i.e. click map! within the scanning sieveon the masterchannel is comparedto the clicksmaps from surroundinghydrophones "scanned"signals!. The scanning sieve time window always starts on a click detection, and is moved acrossthe scannedsignal one click detection at a time, That is,the resultant correlation valueat anytime delayrepresents the numberof matchesbetween the masterchannel pattern startinga specificclick and the scannedchannel pattern starting at a specificclick, The delay of the rnaxirnum correlation value represents the difference in time of arrival where the first clicks in the scanningsieve and the scannedsignal were best aligned. The output of the scanningsieve process are sets of time difference of arrival TDOA! for each click detection received on the master channe! Figure7!. TheTDOA data from eachhydrophone are then histogrammedto estimatethe number of separablesources Figure 8!, Onlydetections associated with significantpopulations are used Figure9!. Theseassociated TDOA sets are then sentto the AUTECmultilateration tracking algo- rithm which calculates3D position. Whistle vocalizations do not typically follow known repetition patterns. An individual can emit a single short whistle or groups of sweepsthat last severalseconds or both. However,the time-fre- quency characteristicsof the calls in whatever sequencethey may occur remain the same on all receivinghydrophones. To determine the TDOAof signalsamong the hydrophones,the detection spectrogramsQ f t! of the availablehydrophones are cross-correlated against a masterchannel, M [8].The cross correlation C tg between the i-th channel and the masterchannel is calculatedover a time window of approximately6 to 10 seconds.That time windowis then advancedby onehalf its duration and Ci tg is updated, Ci t,x!=ZZQ~ f,t!Qi f,t+~! Thetime delayassociated with the peakof the correlationfunctions indicates the TDOAfor a signal relativeto the masterhydrophone Figure 10a!. If whistlesfrom multiplewhales are presentwithin a crosscorrelation time window,multiple correlation peaks will be evident Figure10b!. Note that if both clicksand whistlesare present at the sametime, sperm whale clicks will dominatethe detec- tion spectra.Correlation peaks due to whistlesignals will be obscured.Therefore, for practicalpur- poses,broad-band click events should be removedfrom the detectionspectra prior to crosscorrela- tion. Whilecross correlation of detectionspectra indicates times of signalarrival and the presenceof multiplewhales, it doesnot associatethe time delaysof the correlationpeaks with an individual acrossthe hydrophonechannels. However, as mentionedearly, the sequenceof whistlesfrom an individualis the sameon all receivinghydrophones. Figure 11 shows the time differencesof arrival relative to a master hydrophone of the correlation peaksfor five hydrophones. Notice that there are Proceedingsfrom the internationalWorkshop
Recommended publications
  • New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: a Comprehensive Landscape Analysis
    Photo by Pablo Sanchez Quiza New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: A Comprehensive Landscape Analysis Environmental Defense Fund | Oceans Technology Solutions | April 2021 New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: A Comprehensive Landscape Analysis Authors: Christopher Cusack, Omisha Manglani, Shems Jud, Katie Westfall and Rod Fujita Environmental Defense Fund Nicole Sarto and Poppy Brittingham Nicole Sarto Consulting Huff McGonigal Fathom Consulting To contact the authors please submit a message through: edf.org/oceans/smart-boats edf.org | 2 Contents List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................7 2. Transformative Technologies......................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Sensors ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Satellite remote sensing ...........................................................................................................................12 2.3 Data Collection Platforms ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using Acoustics to Evaluate the Effect of Fishing on School Characteristics of Walleye Pollock Haixue Shen and Terrance J
    Resiliency of Gadid Stocks to Fishing and Climate Change 125 Alaska Sea Grant College Program • AK-SG-08-01, 2008 Using Acoustics to Evaluate the Effect of Fishing on School Characteristics of Walleye Pollock Haixue Shen and Terrance J. Quinn II University of Alaska Fairbanks, Juneau Center, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, Juneau, Alaska Vidar Wespestad Resources Analysts International, Lynnwood, Washington Martin W. Dorn Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington Matthew Kookesh University of Alaska Fairbanks, Juneau Center, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, Juneau, Alaska Abstract Walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) is the target of one of the world’s largest fisheries and is an important prey species in the eastern Bering Sea (EBS) ecosystem. Little is known about the potential effects of fishing on the school characteristics and spatial distribution of walleye pollock. Few dedicated research surveys have been conducted during pollock fishing seasons, so analysis of fishery data is the only feasible approach to study these potential effects. We used acoustic data col- lected continuously by one fishing vessel in January-February 2003, which operated north of Unimak Island. Results from comparisons between two fishing periods showed significant changes of pollock distribution at different scales. The schools were smaller and denser during the second period. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of schools became sparser, as evidenced by the lower frequency of schools per elementary distance sampling unit and the increase in average 126 Shen et al.—School Characteristics of Walleye Pollock next-neighbor distances (NNDs). However, the average NND between schools within a cluster and the average abundance of clusters did not change significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Acoustic Fisheries Surveys at Gray's Reef NMS
    Hydroacoustic surveys: A non-destructive approach to monitoring fish distributions at National Marine Sanctuaries NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 66 This report has been reviewed by the National Ocean Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use by the United States government. Citation for this Report Kracker, L.M. 2007. Hydroacoustic surveys: A non-destructive approach to monitoring fish distributions at National Marine Sanctuaries. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 66. 24 pp. Cover photo credit: Greg McFall. Hydroacoustic surveys: A non-destructive approach to monitoring fish distributions at National Marine Sanctuaries Laura Kracker NOAA, National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research 219 Fort Johnson Road Charleston, South Carolina 29412-9110 NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 66 August, 2007 United States Department of National Oceanic and National Ocean Service Commerce Atmospheric AdministrationDRAFT Carlos M. Gutierrez Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. John (Jack) H. Dunnigan Secretary Administrator Assistant Administrator Laura Kracker Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research (CCEHBR) National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS) In partnership with Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary Prepared for Greg McFall Research Coordinator Gray’s Reef National
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Acoustics for Ecosystem-Based Management: State of the Science and Proposals for Ecosystem Indicators
    Vol. 442: 285–301, 2011 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published December 5 doi: 10.3354/meps09425 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS REVIEW Underwater acoustics for ecosystem-based management: state of the science and proposals for ecosystem indicators Verena M. Trenkel1,*, Patrick H. Ressler2, Mike Jech3, Marianna Giannoulaki4, Chris Taylor5 1Ifremer, rue de l’île d’Yeu, BP 21105, 44311 Nantes cedex 3, France 2Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA 3Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 166 Water St., Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 4Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources, Gournes, PO Box 2214, Iraklion, Greece 5Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, 101 Pivers Island Road, Beaufort, North Carolina 28557, USA ABSTRACT: Ecosystem-based management (EBM) requires more extensive information than single- species management. Active underwater acoustic methods provide a means of collecting a wealth of ecosystem information with high space–time resolution. Worldwide fisheries institutes and agencies are carrying out regular acoustic surveys covering many marine shelf ecosystems, but these data are underutilized. In addition, more and more acoustic data collected by vessels of opportunity are becoming available. To encourage their use for EBM, we provide a brief introduc- tion to acoustic and complementary data collection methods in the water column, and review cur- rent and potential contributions to monitoring population abundance and biomass, spatial distrib- utions, and predator–prey relationships. Further development of acoustics-derived indicators is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics Science and Technology
    Fisheries Technology Committee ICES CM 2000/B:04 REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON FISHERIES ACOUSTICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Ijmuiden/Haarlem, Netherlands 10–14 April 2000 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2–4 DK–1261 Copenhagen K Denmark TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE .........................................................................................................................................1 2 MEETING AGENDA AND APPOINTMENT OF RAPPORTEUR.........................................................................1 3 SESSION A “FISH AVOIDANCE” ..........................................................................................................................1 3.1 G. Arnold Fish avoidance and fisheries acoustics ...........................................................................................1 3.2 P. Fernandes An investigation of fish avoidance using an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle........................2 3.3 F. Gerlotto Some observations on fish avoidance in several seas ...................................................................2 3.4 C. Wilson Consideration in the analysis of acoustic buoy data to investigate fish avoidance.........................2
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Nature in Fisheries Research : the Use of Underwater
    Aquatic Living Resources 16 (2003) 107–112 www.elsevier.com/locate/aquliv Foreword Introducing nature in fisheries research: the use of underwater acoustics for an ecosystem approach of fish population The changes in environmental conditions require an “eco- biomass, or more directly establishing total allocated catches system approach” be adopted when considering fish popula- (TACs) based on the stock biomass. However, in many cases tions. This new approach implies the design of new concepts the contribution of fisheries acoustics remained limited. and hypotheses including knowledge on ecology, behaviour Eventually we are entering a new era, which is based upon and fisheries. Being able to observe in real time and in three two observations. dimensions the living organisms and their environment be- • It is now recognised that fisheries activity in the world comes essential. These are precisely the capabilities of un- has reached and most probably exceeded its maximum derwater acoustics, which is going to play a major role in sustainable yield (Pauly et al., 2002; Myers and Worm, aquatic ecology research. 2003). • The failures of stock management in many cases have demonstrated that the study of a fish stock indepen- 1. Introduction dently from its biology and behaviour, and more gener- ally from the ecosystem where this stock is living, usu- Based on pioneer works in the 1950s by Schaefer (1954), ally lead to erroneous conclusions on its status. Beverton and Holt (1957), Gulland (1969), Fox (1970), These two observations have oriented towards new among others, fisheries biology and its associated models of thoughts in fisheries biology, and to the conclusion that the the dynamics of populations represented a huge step forward understanding of stock dynamics would require an ecosys- in the analysis and monitoring of exploited fish populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments In; Fisheries Acoustics
    Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 189: 123-127. 1990 Day and night fish distribution pattern in the net mouth area of the Norwegian bottom-sampling trawl Arill Engås and Egil Ona Engås, Arill, and Ona, Egil. 1990. Day and night fish distribution pattern in the net mouth area of the Norwegian bottom-sampling trawl. - Rapp. R-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 189: 123—127. A high-frequency scanning sonar, mounted as a net sonde, was used to study fish behaviour in the'mouth area of the Norwegian bottom-sampling trawl. Fish distribu­ tion patterns were significantly different by day and night. At night the fish entered the middle of the trawl, close to the bobbins, and no fish were observed escaping over the headline. During daytime the fish entered more irregularly, using the whole opening of the trawl, and haddock were lost over the headline. The daytime sonar observations were confirmed visually with an underwater vehicle with video camera. The observations indicate that the herding process during bottom trawling may be equally efficient by day and night, and that hearing must play a significant role in this process under non-visual conditions. Arill Engås: Institute o f Fisheries Technology Research, P.O. Box 1964, Nordnes, N-5024 Bergen, Norway. Egil Ona: Institute of Marine Research. P.O. Box 1870, Nordnes, N-5024 Bergen, Norway. non-visual conditions, with the fish showing less orien­ Introduction tation relative to the ground gear than in the daytime. If The Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway, has the reaction to the trawl varies with the ambient light carried out combined bottom-trawl and acoustic surveys level, this may also affect the sampling efficiency of the on the stocks of Northeast Arctic cod and haddock in trawl.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Learning to Improve Marine Science for the Sustainability of Living Ocean Resources Report from the 2019 Norway - U.S
    NOAA Machine Learning to Improve Marine Science for the Sustainability of Living Ocean Resources Report from the 2019 Norway - U.S. Workshop NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-199 November 2019 Machine Learning to Improve Marine Science for the Sustainability of Living Ocean Resources Report from the 2019 Norway - U.S. Workshop Edited by William L. Michaels, Nils Olav Handegard, Ketil Malde, Hege Hammersland-White Contributors (alphabetical order): Vaneeda Allken, Ann Allen, Olav Brautaset, Jeremy Cook, Courtney ​ ​ ​ S. Couch, Matt Dawkins, Sebastien de Halleux, Roger Fosse, Rafael Garcia, Ricard Prados Gutiérrez, ​ Helge Hammersland, Hege Hammersland-White, William L. Michaels, Kim Halvorsen, Nils Olav ​ ​ ​ Handegard, Deborah R. Hart, Kine Iversen, Andrew Jones, Kristoffer Løvall, Ketil Malde, Endre Moen, ​ ​ Benjamin Richards, Nichole Rossi, Arnt-Børre Salberg, , Annette Fagerhaug Stephansen, Ibrahim Umar, ​ ​ ​ Håvard Vågstøl, Farron Wallace, Benjamin Woodward November 2019 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-199 U.S. Department National Oceanic and National Marine Of Commerce Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Neil A. Jacobs, PhD Christopher W. Oliver Secretary of Commerce Acting Under Secretary of Commerce Assistant Administrator for Oceans and Atmosphere for Fisheries and NOAA Administrator Recommended citation: Michaels, W. L., N. O. Handegard, K. Malde, and H. Hammersland-White (eds.). 2019. Machine learning to improve marine science for the sustainability of living ocean resources: Report from the 2019 Norway - U.S. Workshop. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-199, 99 p. ​ ​ ​ ​ Available online at https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/tech-memos/ The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS, or NOAA Fisheries) does not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Biomass of Fish Associated with an Oil and Gas Platform
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Louisiana State University Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2013 Acoustic biomass of fish associated with an oil and gas platform before, during, and after "reefing" it in the northern Gulf of Mexico Grace Elizabeth Harwell Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Harwell, Grace Elizabeth, "Acoustic biomass of fish associated with an oil and gas platform before, during, and after "reefing" it in the northern Gulf of Mexico" (2013). LSU Master's Theses. 2912. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2912 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACOUSTIC BIOMASS OF FISH ASSOCIATED WITH AN OIL AND GAS PLATFORM BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER “REEFING” IT IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Science By Grace E. Harwell B.S., Louisiana State University, 2009 December 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to thank my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioacoustic Attenuation Spectroscopy: a New Approach to Monitoring Fish at Sea
    FEATURED ARTICLE Bioacoustic Attenuation Spectroscopy: A New Approach to Monitoring Fish at Sea Orest Diachok Introduction Swim bladders provide buoyancy and enable fish to be How does one find fishes in the sea? For millennia, catch- neutrally buoyant at their preferred depth between bouts ing fish has depended on luck for a fisherman out for a of vigorous swimming (Helfman et al., 2009). The size of day of recreation and both luck and knowledge of fish the swim bladder varies by species and is often related to behavior and ecological preferences for those seeking the size of the species. Although the swim bladder probably larger catches. Still, in many ways, finding fish, especially evolved to provide buoyancy to the fish, it is also involved in large quantities, was a “shot in the dark.” However, in other functions such as hearing and sound production this started to change when fisheries biologists started in many species (e.g., Popper and Hawkins, 2019). to apply acoustics to the hunt for fishes. The various approaches that have been used and that continue to Figure 1 shows an X-ray image of a side view of the evolve now enable fishers not only to find large groups of swim bladder of a pilchard sardine (Sardinops ocellatus). fish more efficiently and effectively but also to enable fish- Because swim bladders are generally filled with air, they ery biologists to quantify the number of fish in areas of scatter sound in various directions and are the primary interest, their migration patterns, and how their numbers cause of backscattering and the echoes detected by fish- evolve over time as well as other aspects of their behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fish Management Is Tough: Can Fisheries Acoustics Help?
    Reef fish management is tough: Can fisheries acoustics help? Kevin M. Boswell Marine Ecology & Acoustics Lab Primary Drivers Understand factors that act to structure ecosystems, primary focus on habitat function and use by nekton - Distributional dynamics - Habitat associations and linkages - Behavior and trophic interactions Requires continued development of novel approaches - Developing advanced approaches and platforms - Assimilating data at various resolutions and scales Difficulties lie in capacity for ‘observation’ High suspended load Diel variation- Day Diel variation- Day Night Pursue avenue other than transmitted light for ‘observing’ objects Active Acoustics • Acoustics are widely accepted tool for quantifying fish abundance and distribution across multiple environmental conditions • Benefits: reduced sampling effort, non-invasive, high resolution spatio- temporal data, reduced gear bias • Challenges: Require independent data to validate backscatter Barracuda vs. Menhaden Echosounder Imaging Sonar Plankton and 10 m small scatterers Fish 20 m Natural reef Acoustics to inform fishery independent surveys Aggregation studies: Goliath grouper- East Coast of FL. Permit- FL Keys Nassau grouper- Cayman Islands Pink snapper- Western Australia West Florida Shelf: J.C. Taylor, NOAA Courtesy of Chris Dowling/Dani Waltrick Artificial vs Natural reefs Natural vs. Artificial Reef Communities West Florida Shelf- Acoustic/Optical Fisheries Independent Survey Fishery-independent method to examine structure and biomass of reef communities at natural
    [Show full text]
  • California Fish and Wildlife Journal, Volume 106, Issue 2
    California Fish and Wildlife 106(2):139-155; 2020 Feasibility of hydroacoustic surveys of spawning aggregations for monitoring Barred Sand Bass populations off southern California LARRY G. ALLEN1*, CALVIN WON1, DEREK G. BOLSER2, AND BRAD E. ERISMAN2 1 California State University Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, CA 91330-8303 USA 2 Marine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, TX 78373 USA *Corresponding Author: [email protected] For fishes that migrate to specific locations to spawn within large aggregations at predictable times, fishery independent surveys of the abundance, distribu- tion, and population structure of adult fish at spawning aggregation sites can provide valuable data for fisheries monitoring and assessments. We tested the feasibility of using high resolution, split-beam sonar to estimate the distribu- tion, abundance, and group sizes of Barred Sand Bass (Paralabrax nebulifer) at their primary spawning aggregation site off Huntington Beach, California, in July 2010 and July 2012. We established an in-situ target strength distribu- tion for Barred Sand Bass using tethered fish, collected hydroacoustic data opportunistically over the entire spawning grounds, and validated acoustic data with concurrent video surveys and rod and reel sampling of fishes pres- ent within the survey area. The modal target strength of Barred Sand Bass was determined to be -35 dB and was distinct from other fish species present. Groups of Barred Sand Bass averaged 30 individuals in abundance and ranged from 2 to 1,711 individuals, with the vast majority of the groups containing less than 10 individuals. Groups of Barred Sand Bass were most abundant in the water column between 5 and 10 m below the surface over bottoms depths of 20 to 30 m, resulting in a negative relationship between group size and depth.
    [Show full text]