DOCSLIB.ORG

Abstract the Wild Bird Center Experience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abstract the Wild Bird Center Experience ABSTRACT THE WILD BIRD CENTER EXPERIENCE: USING BUSINESS AS A CONDUIT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS By Nicole Lee Lewis This paper details my experiences and activities at the Wild Bird Center (WBC) in Mason, Ohio from August 2007 through April 2008. During my first six months at the WBC I served as the staff Environmental Scientist and Store Manager. The purpose of this report is to summarize the contributions I made to the WBC as well as the impacts this position provided to my previous training in the environmental science field. THE WILD BIRD CENTER EXPERIENCE: USING BUSINESS AS A CONDUET FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS An Internship Report Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Environmental Science by Nicole Lee Lewis Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2009 Advisor________________________ (Steve Elliott) Reader_________________________ (Donna McCollum) Reader_________________________ (David Russell) Table of Contents________________________________________________ List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................iv List of Figures................................................................................................................................................ v List of Appendices .........................................................................................................................................vi 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Learning and Growing........................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Responsibilities ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Birding Products...................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Bird Feeder Basics ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Bird House Basics ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Presentations .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Out-of-Store Presentations......................................................................................... 7 2.3.2 In-Store Presentations.............................................................................................. 12 2.3.3 Newsletters............................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Eco-friendly Concepts ........................................................................................................... 13 3.0 Impacts of Internship........................................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Impacts of Presentations on Sales ........................................................................................ 16 3.2 Impact of Mailings.................................................................................................................. 17 3.3 Other Advertising................................................................................................................... 18 4.0 The Future ....................................................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Changes................................................................................................................................ 20 4.2 Contributions ......................................................................................................................... 21 5.0 References ...................................................................................................................................... 23 Appendix A: Benchmark Reports................................................................................................................. 25 Spreadsheet 1: Monthly Benchmark Tracking ................................................................................. 26 Spreadsheet 2: Weekly Cumulative Sales and Customer Summary Spreadsheet .......................... 27 Spreadsheet 3: Monthly Inventory Budgeting .................................................................................. 28 Spreadsheet 4: Number of Transactions ......................................................................................... 31 Appendix B: Birding Products...................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 1: Two vs. four sided hopper feeder ..................................................................................... 33 Figure 2: Tube feeder ...................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 3: Basic suet cage ................................................................................................................ 34 Figure 4: Split peanut feeder............................................................................................................ 34 Figure 5: Platform feeder ................................................................................................................. 35 Figure 6: Hummingbird feeder ......................................................................................................... 35 Figure 7: Goldfinch feeder ............................................................................................................... 35 Figure 8: Sanctuary bluebird feeder................................................................................................. 36 Figure 9: Nectar oriole feeder .......................................................................................................... 36 Figure 10: Easy cleaning access ..................................................................................................... 36 Figure 11: Hopper feeder with removable wire bottom tray.............................................................. 37 Figure 12: Ant mote ......................................................................................................................... 37 Figure 13: Nectar guard tip .............................................................................................................. 37 Figure 14: Nesting box..................................................................................................................... 38 ii Figure 15: Roosting box................................................................................................................... 38 Figure 16: Birdhouse with easy open side for cleaning.................................................................... 38 Figure 17: Birdhouse with protective metal plate on entrance.......................................................... 39 Figure 18: Arm predator guard......................................................................................................... 39 Appendix C: Newsletters ............................................................................................................................. 40 November 2007 Newsletter ............................................................................................................. 41 December 2007 Newsletter ............................................................................................................. 42 January 2008 Newsletter ................................................................................................................. 43 February 2008 Newsletter................................................................................................................ 44 March 2008 Newsletter.................................................................................................................... 45 Appendix D: PowerPoint Presentations....................................................................................................... 46 Presentation 1: Backyard Critters and Recycling............................................................................. 47 Presentation 2: Birds, Bugs, and Butterflies..................................................................................... 57 Presentation 3: Parasitic Birds......................................................................................................... 69 Presentation 4: Birds of the Rainbow............................................................................................... 74 Presentation 5: Kids Wonderful World of Birds ................................................................................ 93 Presentation 6: Wonderful Birds of Winter ..................................................................................... 102 Presentation 7: Life Emerging........................................................................................................ 108 Appendix E: In-Store Presentations........................................................................................................... 117 In-store Presentations...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Host Alarm Calls Attract the Unwanted Attention of the Brood Parasitic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Host alarm calls attract the unwanted attention of the brood parasitic common cuckoo Attila Marton 1,2*, Attila Fülöp 2,3, Katalin Ozogány1, Csaba Moskát 4,5 & Miklós Bán 1,3,5 It is well known that avian brood parasites lay their eggs in the nests of other bird species, called hosts. It remains less clear, however, just how parasites are able to recognize their hosts and identify the exact location of the appropriate nests to lay their eggs in. While previous studies attributed high importance to visual signals in fnding the hosts’ nests (e.g. nest building activity or the distance and direct sight of the nest from vantage points used by the brood parasites), the role of host acoustic signals during the nest searching stage has been largely neglected. We present experimental evidence that both female and male common cuckoos Cuculus canorus pay attention to their host’s, the great reed warbler’s Acrocephalus arundinaceus alarm calls, relative to the calls of an unparasitized species used as controls. Parallel to this, we found no diference between the visibility of parasitized and unparasitized nests during drone fights, but great reed warblers that alarmed more frequently experienced higher rates of parasitism. We conclude that alarm calls might be advantageous for the hosts when used against enemies or for alerting conspecifcs, but can act in a detrimental manner by providing important nest location cues for eavesdropping brood parasites. Our results suggest that host alarm calls may constitute a suitable trait on which cuckoo nestlings can imprint on to recognize their primary host species later in life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Cuckoo Is an Effective Indicator of High Bird Species
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The common cuckoo is an effective indicator of high bird species richness in Asia and Europe Received: 16 February 2017 Federico Morelli1, Anders Pape Møller2, Emma Nelson3, Yanina Benedetti1, Wei Liang 4, Accepted: 19 May 2017 Petra Šímová 1, Marco Moretti5 & Piotr Tryjanowski6 Published: xx xx xxxx Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus is a charismatic bird species with a dominant presence in human culture: from folklore legends to nowadays there is evidence of cuckoos being a prime candidate as a surrogate of bird diversity. Recent studies demonstrated that the cuckoo can predict hotspots of taxonomic diversity and functional diversity of bird communities in European countries. In this study, we demonstrated that the cuckoo is an excellent bioindicator at multi-spatial scale, extending cuckoo surrogacy from Europe to Asia. Even using three different survey methods (transect, square, point counts), comparing the new findings with results of our research in Europe, sites where the cuckoo is present were characterized by greater species richness, while the cuckoo was absent from sites with low species richness. The goodness of fit of models based on point counts ranged between 71 and 92%. Furthermore, the cuckoo population trend mirrors the average population trend and climate suitability of overall bird communities in Europe. The common cuckoo is therefore a suitable intercontinental bioindicator of hotspots of bird richness, even under climate change scenarios or in areas where the species co-occurs with other cuckoo species, opening a new avenue for standardized citizen science on bird biodiversity surveys worldwide. Why is the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus a fascinating bird species for humans? What are the main reasons for the species being known as “a messenger of spring and morality”1, and why is it so conspicuous in human culture? A review of folklore shows clearly that the enigmatic cuckoo has driven the collective imagination of people throughout the world for thousands of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Individually Distinctive Vocalization in Common Cuckoos (Cuculus Canorus)
    1 1 Individually distinctive vocalization in Common Cuckoos 2 (Cuculus canorus) 3 4 1 2 3 5 Sándor Zsebők , Csaba Moskát , Miklós Bán * 6 7 8 1Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, Eötvös 9 University, H-1117 Budapest, Pázmány P. sétány 1/C., Budapest, Hungary 10 2MTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, a joint 11 research group of the Biological Institute of Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Pázmány 12 Péter sétány 1/C., H-1117 Budapest, Hungary and the Hungarian Natural History Museum, 13 Baross u. 13., Budapest, H-1088, Hungary 14 3MTA-DE "Lendület" Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Evolutionary 15 Zoology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, H-4010, Hungary 16 17 *Corresponding Author: Miklós Bán, [email protected] 18 19 Keywords: Common Cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, sound analysis, individual discrimination, 20 classification accuracy, acoustic signatures 21 22 Word count: 5,932 23 24 25 2 26 ABSTRACT 27 28 Distinctive individual vocalizations are advantageous in several social contexts. Both genetic 29 and environmental effects are responsible for this phenomenon resulting in different 30 frequencies and time domains of sounds in birds. This individuality can be utilized in 31 breeding bird censuses and abundance estimates. In this study we explored the individuality 32 of the advertisement calls of male Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) with the aims of 33 describing the acoustic ways in which individuals differ from each other, and characterizing 34 the practical requirements for using statistical learning methods for individual recognition. 35 We collected calls from a Hungarian cuckoo population and conducted discriminant function 36 analysis on acoustic parameters to distinguish individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejection Behavior by Common Cuckoo Hosts Towards Artificial Brood Parasite Eggs
    REJECTION BEHAVIOR BY COMMON CUCKOO HOSTS TOWARDS ARTIFICIAL BROOD PARASITE EGGS ARNE MOKSNES, EIVIN ROSKAFT, AND ANDERS T. BRAA Departmentof Zoology,University of Trondheim,N-7055 Dragvoll,Norway ABSTRACT.--Westudied the rejectionbehavior shown by differentNorwegian cuckoo hosts towardsartificial CommonCuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs. The hostswith the largestbills were graspejectors, those with medium-sizedbills were mostlypuncture ejectors, while those with the smallestbills generally desertedtheir nestswhen parasitizedexperimentally with an artificial egg. There were a few exceptionsto this general rule. Becausethe Common Cuckooand Brown-headedCowbird (Molothrus ater) lay eggsthat aresimilar in shape,volume, and eggshellthickness, and they parasitizenests of similarly sizedhost species,we support the punctureresistance hypothesis proposed to explain the adaptivevalue (or evolution)of strengthin cowbirdeggs. The primary assumptionand predictionof this hypothesisare that somehosts have bills too small to graspparasitic eggs and thereforemust puncture-eject them,and that smallerhosts do notadopt ejection behavior because of the heavycost involved in puncture-ejectingthe thick-shelledparasitic egg. We comparedour resultswith thosefor North AmericanBrown-headed Cowbird hosts and we found a significantlyhigher propor- tion of rejectersamong CommonCuckoo hosts with graspindices (i.e. bill length x bill breadth)of <200 mm2. Cuckoo hosts ejected parasitic eggs rather than acceptthem as cowbird hostsdid. Amongthe CommonCuckoo hosts, the costof acceptinga parasiticegg probably alwaysexceeds that of rejectionbecause cuckoo nestlings typically eject all hosteggs or nestlingsshortly after they hatch.Received 25 February1990, accepted 23 October1990. THEEGGS of many brood parasiteshave thick- nestseither by grasping the eggs or by punc- er shells than the eggs of other bird speciesof turing the eggs before removal. Rohwer and similar size (Lack 1968,Spaw and Rohwer 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • American Paleontologist Pages 1 and 4
    FinalV OLUMEIssue 19, NUMBER 4 AMERICAN WINTER 2012 PALEONTOLOGIST A MAGAZINE OF EARTH SCIENCE PUBLISHED BY THE PALEONTOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTION AND ITS MUSEUM OF THE EARTH The Last Good Buy Birds in the New Age of Extinction Also in this issue... An Inordinate Fondness for Vertebrae page 20 Goodbye American Paleontologist pages 1 and 4 ...plus much more! US $5.00 FEATURE ARTICLE Th e Last Good Buy: Birds in the New Age of Extinction By Constance M. Soja Th e oldest fossils belonging to the undisputed bird survivors of the end-Mesozoic biodiversity crisis experienced Archaeopteryx date back 140-150 million years to the extraordinary evolutionary radiations. Co-adapting to the Mesozoic. During that geologic era, dinosaurs dominated brave new world, they fi lled vacated ecologic niches and terrestrial ecosystems around the globe. Pterosaurs – evolved into the iconic species that defi ne the Cenozoic – dinosaurs' evolutionary cousins, the fl ying reptiles – soared our modern world and Earth's current great geologic era. overhead, and an astounding variety of diminutive to gigantic With most animal and plant groups of the Mesozoic laid to aquatic reptiles – ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, pliosaurs, and rest, new species rose to dominance, and new competitive mosasaurs – cruised the world's oceans. Consuming squid- relationships were established. Oversized, fl ightless "terror like belemnoid and ammonoid prey, those top predators birds" – T. rex ultimate but down-sized body doubles – were also swam in the shallow seaways that fl ooded the interior pitted against fox- and pony-sized mammals, which in the of North America and other continents. Within 80 million previous 150 million years had been small, nocturnal, rat- years, the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction that brought like animals eeking out a subsidiary existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Grounded Birds in New Zealand
    Flightless Grounded Birds in New Zealand An 8th Grade Research Paper By Nathaniel Roth Hilltown Cooperative Charter Public School June 2014 1 More than half of the birds in New Zealand either can’t fly, can only partially fly, or don’t like to fly. (Te Ara) This is a fact. Although only sixteen species in New Zealand are technically flightless, with another sixteen that are extinct (TerraNature), a majority of more than 170 bird species will not fly unless their lives are threatened, or not even then. This is surprising, since birds are usually known for flying. A flightless bird is a bird that cannot fly, such as the well­known ostrich and emu, not to mention penguins. The two main islands southeast of Australia that make up New Zealand have an unusually diverse population of these birds. I am personally very interested in New Zealand and know a lot about it because my mother was born there, and I still have family there. I was very intrigued by these birds in particular, and how different they are from most of the world’s birds. I asked myself, why New Zealand? What made this tiny little country have so many birds that can’t fly, while in the rest of the world, hardly any live in one place? My research has informed me that the population and diversity of flightless birds here is so large because it has been isolated for so long from other land masses. Almost no mammals, and no land predators, lived there in the millions of years after it split from the Australian continent, so flying birds didn’t have as much of an advantage during this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Textile Society of America Newsletter 27:2 — Fall 2015 Textile Society of America
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Textile Society of America Newsletters Textile Society of America Fall 2015 Textile Society of America Newsletter 27:2 — Fall 2015 Textile Society of America Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsanews Part of the Art and Design Commons Textile Society of America, "Textile Society of America Newsletter 27:2 — Fall 2015" (2015). Textile Society of America Newsletters. 71. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsanews/71 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Textile Society of America at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Textile Society of America Newsletters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. VOLUME 27. NUMBER 2. FALL, 2015 Cover Image: Collaborative work by Pat Hickman and David Bacharach, Luminaria, 2015, steel, animal membrane, 17” x 23” x 21”, photo by George Potanovic, Jr. page 27 Fall 2015 1 Newsletter Team BOARD OF DIRECTORS Roxane Shaughnessy Editor-in-Chief: Wendy Weiss (TSA Board Member/Director of External Relations) President Designer and Editor: Tali Weinberg (Executive Director) [email protected] Member News Editor: Ellyane Hutchinson (Website Coordinator) International Report: Dominique Cardon (International Advisor to the Board) Vita Plume Vice President/President Elect Editorial Assistance: Roxane Shaughnessy (TSA President) and Vita Plume (Vice President) [email protected] Elena Phipps Our Mission Past President [email protected] The Textile Society of America is a 501(c)3 nonprofit that provides an international forum for the exchange and dissemination of textile knowledge from artistic, cultural, economic, historic, Maleyne Syracuse political, social, and technical perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Leptosomiformes ~ Trogoniformes ~ Bucerotiformes ~ Piciformes
    Birds of the World part 6 Afroaves The core landbirds originating in Africa TELLURAVES: AFROAVES – core landbirds originating in Africa (8 orders) • ORDER ACCIPITRIFORMES – hawks and allies (4 families, 265 species) – Family Cathartidae – New World vultures (7 species) – Family Sagittariidae – secretarybird (1 species) – Family Pandionidae – ospreys (2 species) – Family Accipitridae – kites, hawks, and eagles (255 species) • ORDER STRIGIFORMES – owls (2 families, 241 species) – Family Tytonidae – barn owls (19 species) – Family Strigidae – owls (222 species) • ORDER COLIIFORMES (1 family, 6 species) – Family Coliidae – mousebirds (6 species) • ORDER LEPTOSOMIFORMES (1 family, 1 species) – Family Leptosomidae – cuckoo-roller (1 species) • ORDER TROGONIFORMES (1 family, 43 species) – Family Trogonidae – trogons (43 species) • ORDER BUCEROTIFORMES – hornbills and hoopoes (4 families, 74 species) – Family Upupidae – hoopoes (4 species) – Family Phoeniculidae – wood hoopoes (9 species) – Family Bucorvidae – ground hornbills (2 species) – Family Bucerotidae – hornbills (59 species) • ORDER PICIFORMES – woodpeckers and allies (9 families, 443 species) – Family Galbulidae – jacamars (18 species) – Family Bucconidae – puffbirds (37 species) – Family Capitonidae – New World barbets (15 species) – Family Semnornithidae – toucan barbets (2 species) – Family Ramphastidae – toucans (46 species) – Family Megalaimidae – Asian barbets (32 species) – Family Lybiidae – African barbets (42 species) – Family Indicatoridae – honeyguides (17 species) – Family
    [Show full text]
  • Museum Alive Educator Guide
    GRADES K-8 EDUCATOR GUIDE ABOUT COLOSSUS PRODUCTIONS Colossus Productions is the 3D-specialist production company formed by Atlantic Productions (see more below) with Sky in 2011. The joint venture was created to develop and produce high-end 3D films for UK and international audiences. Emerging from Atlantic Production’s record in producing award winning content, Colossus has already released in IMAX and Giant Screen such diverse educational and entertaining films as Flying Monsters 3D, Penguins 3D and Galapagos 3D: Nature’s Wonderland into cinemas worldwide. Colossus’ most recent IMAX/Giant Screen films are Museum Alive and Amazing Mighty Micro Monsters which were released in late 2016 and the newest Colossus production, Conquest of the Skies will be released in IMAX and Giant Screen later in 2016. ATLANTIC PRODUCTIONS Atlantic Productions is one of the world’s leading factual production companies whose multi BAFTA and Emmy award-winning films nda content are regularly seen in over 100 countries around the world. Founded in 1992, Atlantic has built a reputation for world-class story-telling, enhanced by the latest techniques and technologies including the building of pioneering cross-platform and digital experiences. Atlantic Productions leads a group of companies which make television programmes, theatrical and IMAX films, apps (Atlantic Digital), visual effects (Zoo VFX) and now, immersive virtual reality experiences (Alchemy VR). CREDITS Educator Reviewers Writer Garrick Humphrey, M.S.Ed. Literacy, Samantha Zuhlke, Creative Management elementary educator Solutions Colleen Humphrey, M.S.Ed. Curriculum and Instruction, secondary math educator Editors Christina Riska Simmons, Education Fact Checker Consultant Bob Connelly Jessica Shea, M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honeyguide
    THE HONEYGUIDE (Children’s Story/Parable) Gary B. Swanson Associate Director General Conference Sabbath School and Personal Ministries “‘I tell you the truth, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be condemned; he has crossed over from death to life’” (John 5:24 NIV). In northern Kenya a nomadic tribe of people, the Borans, have learned to communicate in a crude way with a species of birds, known as honeyguides. These birds first draw the attention of humans by swooping close to them, hopping restlessly from branch to branch nearby, and making a persistent call. When the humans approach, the bird disappears over the treetops, but reappears after about 20 minutes to call again and wait for them to proceed further. The Borans follow the birds, all the while whistling, banging sticks together, or talking loudly. This pattern is repeated till the bird and the human reach a beehive in an average of about three hours. Then the Borans enjoy the honey—a staple in their diet—and the honeyguides feast on bee larvae and wax from the honeycombs. Although accounts of this relationship between human and bird have been reported since the 1700s, biologists have only recently documented it. Researchers have found that if they leave the hive to which a bird has led them without breaking into it, the bird will guide them back again and again. This, in a way, is what Bible study does for a Christian. It repeatedly returns the reader to the real source of life, Jesus Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Birds Can't Fly? a List of Birds That Are Flightless
    Which Birds Can't Fly? A List of Birds That Are Flightless worldatlas.com/articles/flightless-birds-from-around-the-world.html May 17, 2016 An Australian Emu posing for the camera. Below we have listed a few notable flightless birds, though obviously not all of these largely land-restricted avian species. Other notable flightless bird species include emus, rheas, certain teals and scrubfowls, grebes, cormorants, and various rails, just to name a few. Cassowary 1/11 The flightless birds of Papua New Guinea, northeastern Australia, and some other islands of Oceania, the cassowaries are quite well known for their fierce reputation. Though they cannot fly they can definitely scare away their enemies with their violent nature and hidden claws. Many human and animal deaths have been reported to be caused by these birds. The birds are omnivorous in nature, feeding on fruits, fungi, insects and other species. Among the three species of cassowary, the southern cassowary is the third tallest bird in the world and is classified as vulnerable by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) due to its steadily decreasing numbers. Kakapo 2/11 The kakapo, a unique species of flightless parrot, is endemic to New Zealand and is almost on the verge of extinction, classified as critically endangered by the IUCN. The fact that kakapos are nocturnal in nature, flightless and do not exhibit any male parental care, makes them different from other parrots of the world. They are also the heaviest among the parrots and exhibit the lek system of mating. For years these birds have been hunted by the Maori tribes of New Zealand for meat and feathers.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Honeyguides in Southeast Cape Province, South Africa
    52 SK•AD,Honeyguides ofSoutheast CapeProvince t[AukJan. NOTES ON HONEYGUIDES IN SOUTHEAST CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA BY C. J. SKEAD Now that I am no longer living on a farm it seemsadvisable to collate what little data I have accumulatedon honeyguidesand add it to the scanty knowledgewe have of these birds, in this instance the LesserHoneyguide, Indicator minor minor, the Greater Honeyguide, Indicator indicator, and Wahlberg's Sharp-billed Honeyguide, Pro- dotiscusregulus regulus. The farm "Gameston" where these records were taken lies in the grass-and bush-coveredupper reachesof the Kariega River, 15 miles southwestof Grahamstown, Albany district, Southeast Cape Province, South Africa. This veld-type, known as "bontebosveld," spreads over a large part of the southeastcape. Although I have known the birds for many years the written recordscover a period of about five years. (1) THE LESSERHONEYGUIDE F.colog3.--This speciesprefers the scrub bushyeld and more open acaciaveld, sitting amongthe inner branchesof the trees and bushes but makingconspicuous flights in the openfrom one patch of bushto another. Status.--I have recordedthem in January, February, March, July, August,September, and December. This suggeststhey are resident and not migratory. They are very restlessbirds being seldomseen for more than an hour or so and, in my experience,usually one at a time, even when they parasitized a nest of Black-collared Barbers, Lybius torquatus,in our garden. But from July to September, 1949, two often consortedtogether, attracted, I think, by combs of honey protrudingfrom the gardenbee-hives. There were no barbetsin the garden then. Field Characters.--Thereare no striking features; their dull colora- tion is lightly offset by the golden sheen seen on the back when the light is good.
    [Show full text]