DOCSLIB.ORG

The Currency Transaction Tax Enhancing Financial Stability and Financing Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Currency Transaction Tax Enhancing Financial Stability and Financing Development A NEW PROPOSITION FOR THE TOBIN TAX A report by Sony Kapoor for The Tobin Tax Network July 2004 The Currency Transaction Tax enhancing financial stability and financing development produced with support from A NEW PROPOSITION FOR THE TOBIN TAX The Currency Transaction Tax enhancing financial stability and financing development A report by Sony Kapoor for The Tobin Tax Network July 2004 with support from ENHANCING FINANCIAL STABILITY AND FINANCING DEVELOPMENT Contents Foreword 3 Executive summary 5 Introduction 9 1 The foreign exchange market 13 2 Our currency transaction tax (CTT) proposition 15 3 CTT: a radical proposal or a mainstream idea? 19 4 The CTT: raising revenue, decreasing volatility and reducing the likelihood 21 of currency crises 5 Benefits of the CTT for the world economy and sovereign states 23 6 The business case for the CTT 29 7 The social and economic consequences of a currency crisis 33 8 The Millennium Development Goals and financing international development 35 9 CTT progress and next steps 37 10 Responding to criticisms of the CTT 39 Appendices 45 I The foreign exchange market 45 II Our proposal for the CTT 51 III The CTT is a mainstream idea 59 IV The CTT: decreasing volatility and reducing the likelihood of currency crises 65 V The opportunity costs of holding foreign exchange reserves 79 VI Responding to criticisms of the CTT 85 VII The Millennium Development Goals 89 VIII The Tobin Tax Network position paper on the International Finance Facility91 Frequently asked questions 97 Glossary 105 Bibliography 111 © TOBIN TAX NETWORK 2004 1 THE CURRENCY TRANSACTION TAX 2 © TOBIN TAX NETWORK 2004 ENHANCING FINANCIAL STABILITY AND FINANCING DEVELOPMENT Foreword The Tobin Tax The idea of taxing the trade in currencies was first suggested by Nobel prize-winning economist, James Tobin. This is why the currency transaction tax (CTT) is often referred to as the Tobin Tax. Today’s CTT proposition is for a variable tax with two different rates. A very low rate used in normal market conditions that would generate substantial revenues for international development and a very high rate employed at times of exceptional volatility to prevent financial shocks and create greater economic stability. A few weeks ago Belgian parliamentarians made a historic vote in their Assembly when they passed legislation for a currency transaction tax (CTT). More than 30 years since James Tobin first proposed the concept of taxing the currency trade, the tax that popularly bears his name is now widely known by politicians, financial journalists and millions of people across the world. Yet it has taken until this time to be expressed in such a form that is both technically feasible and politically acceptable. This is the breakthrough the Belgian legislation represents. The purpose of this report is to detail how the present CTT proposition is not only possible but eminently desirable. From the world’s poorest communities, who would benefit from the revenue it can generate, to the world’s business community, who would benefit from far greater market stability, it is clear that the advantages of a CTT are so considerable that failure to make progress along this road would be very costly. We have designed this report to be easily accessible to various audiences. The main body is comprised of very concise chapters. If a reader would like to go deeper into the background of the conclusions, they will find more detailed research and analysis presented in the appendices. The report also contains a comprehensive ‘frequently asked questions’ section and a glossary. Since James Tobin first presented his tax on currency trading, the market in foreign exchange has expanded one hundred times. It is not surprising, therefore, that his original concept has been seriously modernised to fit with today’s market conditions. In this respect, we acknowledge the important work of German economist Paul Bernd Spahn, who developed the idea of a two- tier Tobin Tax that lies at the heart of our CTT proposition. Our report builds on the foundations laid by Spahn, improving certain aspects by drawing on the expertise of academics and finance professionals. James Tobin’s great idea was to tax the trade in currencies. We believe that with this report we can show how a modern version of his concept is now not only possible but makes absolute sense in order to create a more stable financial environment for business, for trade, for employment and to generate urgently needed revenue to benefit the world’s poor. About the Tobin Tax Network The Tobin Tax Network is a coalition of more than 50 charities, campaign agencies, faith groups and trade unions set up at the end of 2001 to campaign for the currency transaction tax. The combined memberships of all these organisations number many millions of UK citizens. © TOBIN TAX NETWORK 2004 3 THE CURRENCY TRANSACTION TAX 4 © TOBIN TAX NETWORK 2004 ENHANCING FINANCIAL STABILITY AND FINANCING DEVELOPMENT Executive summary How is the market organised? The currency market is the largest market in the world, with a turnover of US$300,000 billion every year. It is loosely regulated and, despite its size, is highly concentrated. Most of the trading is carried out by about 30 large banks trading mostly G7 currencies in eight major locations. How are exchange rates determined? The price at which one currency can be exchanged for another is not constant but varies in response to changes in inflation, interest rates, unemployment and other economic factors. It is also influenced by other factors, such as speculation and market psychology, which affect the supply and demand for a currency. Surveys1 of currency traders show that economic fundamentals are relatively unimportant in trading decisions up to a six-month horizon. Since more than 90% of market transactions have a time horizon shorter than six months, it follows that most currency trading decisions do not reflect the true underlying economic value. As a consequence, exchange rates do not reflect the true relative strengths of economies and can lead to bad investment decisions. More than 75% of currency traders believe that speculation is the single most important reason why currency values do not reflect economic fundamentals. What is currency volatility? Though major economic variables change relatively infrequently, it is common for exchange rates to change up to 100,000 times in a single day. 2 While most of these changes are small, they can sometimes add up to as much as 20% or more over the span of weeks or even days. Currency volatility is a measure of this change in the price of a currency. The larger and the more frequent the fluctuations in the exchange rate, the higher the currency volatility. When this volatility is very high, involving several large changes in prices, it causes instability in the financial system. How does currency volatility affect us? Financial instability is one of the most serious problems currently confronting the world. High volatility in financial markets, even when it does not lead to spectacular crashes of the kind seen in South East Asia in 1997–8,3 carries high social and economic costs. It acts as a tax on trade, investment, social welfare and growth and can undo in days what has taken years of development effort to achieve. 1 From surveys of currency Currency instability is by far the most pernicious form of financial volatility because of the traders by Cheung et al, 2000; Cheung Y and Chinn MD, severity of its impact. While excessive volatility in the stock or the bond markets is harmful, 2000; Hutcheson T, 2000. See Appendix IV damage is limited to certain sectors of an economy and the people associated with those 2 Bloomberg sectors. Instability in the currency markets, on the other hand, affects all aspects of the 3 See www.ids.ac.uk/ids/global economy and can have disastrous effects on millions of people. /Finance/easia.html © TOBIN TAX NETWORK 2004 5 THE CURRENCY TRANSACTION TAX How does currency volatility come about? Currency instability does not arise because of the actions of ‘evil speculators’ but is a natural outcome of the incentive structure built into the market. The actions of a limited number of currency traders just doing their jobs can inflict damage to whole economies and have ruinous consequences for their populations. What can we do to reduce currency volatility? When the actions of a few can affect the welfare of many, there is a strong justification for public policy intervention. However, there are many who believe that ‘markets know best’. There is a way of striking a compromise between the two beliefs, using a market-based solution. The currency transaction tax changes the incentive structure in the market and works by discouraging instability-causing behaviour amongst currency traders. While there have been various proposals for a tax in the past, they have either been impractical or incomplete. Both by building on the work done by others and using our own original research, we have proposed a comprehensive, pragmatic and feasible version of a currency transaction tax that would stabilise the currency markets. It would also reduce the occurrence of the kind of currency crashes that were seen in South East Asia, Mexico, Russia and Brazil. What is our currency transaction tax (CTT) proposal? Our proposal for a CTT is a market-based mechanism which, by changing the incentive structure in the market, helps discourage excessive speculation and encourages traders to give greater importance to economic fundamentals. It comprises a very small (0.005%) tax that will be levied on all exchange transactions in a particular currency and a higher variable tax that will apply only in highly volatile markets and act as a circuit breaker to stabilise markets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SW (61-80)-Resp
    Illuminating the dark corners of the financial system MARINA PONTI FEDERICA BIONDI Financial mechanisms, as they stand today, are not able to counteract illegal transactions. Greater transparency and stricter rules should be prioritised by richer countries, not only as a means of fostering social justice and redistribution of wealth, but also as an instrument to fight criminal operations and terrorism. Along these lines, a currency transaction tax would be a relevant step forward and provide a concrete mechanism for monitoring cross-border financial transactions. “The fundamental problem is to find a social system discontent amongst the tax-paying population, thus further increasing the risk which is efficient economically and morally.” of illegal flight of funds to avoid high taxation. A vicious circle sets in. Another example of the lack of transparency in cross-border financial J.M. Keynes, 1925 transactions is the agencies that transfer money worldwide using money orders. Donor countries lament lack of resources as the reason for neglecting their These agencies have widespread networks of offices all over the world. They commitment to give at least 0.7% of GNP for Official Development Assistance. are used mainly by people who have moved from a “developing country” to a But these same countries allow the many dark corners of their financial markets “developed” one to find work and who wish to send part of their earnings to to cause large and increasing losses of fiscal revenues every year. Financial their families without the complications of opening a bank account. Considering markets are not transparent; this implies an enormous loss of revenue and the number of people in this situation, it is easy to deduce that the figures creates a breeding ground for illicit transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for a Tobin Tax? Some Practical and Political Arguments
    Oxfam GB Time for a Tobin Tax? Some practical and political arguments May 1999 This paper was written for Oxfam (Great Britain) by Heinz Stecher with contributions from Michael Bailey. Comments from readers are welcome. For further information or feedback, please contact Jenny Kimmis, Oxfam GB Policy Department (+44 1865 312212 or [email protected]). Oxfam GB is a member of Oxfam International. Time for a Tobin Tax? Some practical and political arguments Summary This paper is intended to further discussion on ‘Tobin taxes’. It provides information on the currency aspect of international financial instability, looks at the arguments around a global currency transaction tax and its potential value, explores the possibility of the proposal’s further political advance, and concludes with comments on prospects for advocacy. Why a currency transaction tax? James Tobin, an American economist, made his proposal for a levy on international currency transactions in 1978. The tax was designed to deter the speculation that causes sharp exchange rate fluctuations and serious damage to economies. In the 1990s, two additional facts have sharpened interest in Tobin’s proposal and its variants. The first is the huge growth in foreign exchange trading to about $1.8 trillion per day and the corresponding increase in currency instability and related financial crises. Second, since the tax could generate substantial sums, the idea has attracted the attention of those concerned with financing development – a concern accentuated by the fiscal challenges faced by the state as well as by the growing need for international co-operation on problems of poverty, the environment and security.
    [Show full text]
  • 29Th April 2012 NEWS RELEASE CARDINAL O
    29th April 2012 NEWS RELEASE CARDINAL O’BRIEN BRANDS CAMERON’S OPPOSITION TO THE ROBIN HOOD TAX ‘SHAMEFUL’ The UK’s most senior Catholic, Cardinal Keith O’Brien, has branded David Cameron and his government’s opposition to a tiny tax on banks and the financial sector to help combat poverty as ‘shameful’. In a letter to the Prime Minister the Cardinal outlined his support for the Robin Hood Tax campaign, which calls for the UK Government to put in place a 0.05% tax on financial transactions such as bonds, stocks and derivatives. If implemented, it could raise £20 billion annually in the UK to be spent on poverty alleviation at home and overseas, and support communities affected by climate change. The Cardinal highlighted that thousands of SCIAF supporters across Scotland have signed up to the campaign, adding their voices to a widespread movement across Scotland, the UK and internationally, amid growing political support for such a tax. Cardinal O’Brien said: “At this difficult economic time more needs to be done to help the poor, both at home and abroad, as they are the ones hit the hardest by the fall-out of the global financial crisis. The banks and financial sector, which caused the problem, have a clear responsibility to pay their fair share. It is shameful that David Cameron is currently protecting his wealthy friends in the City by his opposition to this simple, fair and sustainable financial transactions tax.” In his letter to David Cameron (full text below) Cardinal O’Brien said: “The economy must be judged by what it achieves for the common good.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Taxation: Mirrless and Beyond
    Original citation: McEldowney, John F. and Salter, David. (2016) Environmental taxation in the UK : the Climate Change Levy and policy making. Denning Law Journal. http://ubplj.org/index.php/dlj/index Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/80815 Copyright and reuse: The Warwick Research Archive Portal (WRAP) makes this work by researchers of the University of Warwick available open access under the following conditions. Copyright © and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in WRAP has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the ‘permanent WRAP URL’ above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Denning Law Journal – special issue - ‘Contemporary Legal and Policy Issues in the Global Oil and Gas Sector’ Environmental Taxation in the UK: the Climate Change Levy and policy making John McEldowney* and David Salter** ABSTRACT Environmental taxation is different from many other forms of taxation as it is not only used to raise revenue but it is also able to marginally influence behaviour to protect and enhance the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Robin Hood in a Time of Austerity · LRB 18 February 2016
    8/30/2016 James Meek · Robin Hood in a Time of Austerity · LRB 18 February 2016 Back to article page Robin Hood in a Time of Austerity James Meek 00:00 81:58 Myth is a story that can be retold by anyone, with infinite variation, and still be recognisable as itself. The outline of surviving myth is re­recognised in the lives of each generation. It’s an instrument by which people simplify, rationalise and retell social complexities. It’s a means to haul the abstract, the global and the relative into the realm of the concrete, the local and the absolute. It’s a way to lay claim to faith in certain values. If those who attempt to interpret the world do so only through the prism of professional thinkers, and ignore the persistence of myth in everyday thought and speech, the interpretations will be deficient. This is the importance of the Robin Hood myth. It’s the first and often the only political­ economic fable we learn. It’s not a children’s story, although it is childlike. It contains the three essential ingredients of grown­up narrative – love, death and money – without being a love story, a tragedy or a comedy. It doesn’t tell of the founding of a people. It’s not a fairy story or a religious myth; it has no monsters, gods or wizards in it, only human beings. It’s not a parable. In place of a moral, it has a plan of action. What does Robin Hood do? We all know.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Chinese RMB Undervalued
    Department of Economics Uppsala University Bachelor’s Thesis Authors: Lars Barnekow and Martin Dalsenius Supervisor: Dr. Yngve Andersson Spring semester 2006 A Case Study of the Controversies of the Chinese Currency Regime 0 Abstract The debate on whether or not the Chinese currency is undervalued has been one of the most intensely debated economic subjects in recent times. The opinions amongst economists as well as politicians are all but homogenous. Through several different calculations, it has been estimated that the Chinese currency is undervalued, and should be appreciated, by as much as 30%. On the other hand there are several economists who think that this would cause severe damage to the Chinese economy with a clear risk of throwing it into a recession. Those who believe the latter either argue for no change from the present exchange rate policy until significant actions have been taken to sanitise the financial markets, or else that small liberalisations of the restrictions on capital flows are needed first. We make our own extensive examination of current theories and how they apply to the specific Chinese data. For instance data on China’s trade balance and the open market actions of the People’s Bank of China to maintain the exchange rate to the dollar while at the same time trying to keep its inflation goal. We also take a deep look at the Chinese domestic markets, the financial system, the possible effects on investment levels of abandoning capital restrictions etc. Eventually, we come to the conclusion that small gradual liberalisations of the restrictions on capital flows at the same time as the country takes serious measures to deal with its weak financial system is the best medicine for China.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Transaction Tax: a Discussion Paper on Fiscal and Economic
    Financial transaction tax: A discussion paper on fiscal and economic implications June 2013 The political debate surrounding the financial transaction tax has become fixated on the simplistic common denominator: collecting money, penalising banks, assuaging the markets and establishing justice. These winsome and appealing demands currently enjoy broad support in Germany. With public approval at 82% according to the European Commission's Eurobarometer survey, positive sentiment is highest in Germany ahead of both France and Greece, where approval is at 75%. And so it appears that the political common denominator has been found! However, from a macroeconomic perspective the crux is whether it would ultimately be possible to satisfy regulatory and fiscal demands by introducing the financial transaction tax. Doubts are not unwarranted in this regard. Is the financial transaction tax capable of fulfilling the necessary functions of financing, distribution and steering? Although the specific embodiment of the financial transaction tax remains nebulous for the time being, if one takes a long-term, holistic view, the direct and indirect costs of introducing such a tax appear to outweigh the benefits. The following observations summarise the manifest flaws in the concept, as well as the financial and real economic ramifications of those flaws, which have not been given sufficient consideration. In June 2012, the German federal government and the opposition published a green paper, in which they promised "to assess the impact the tax would have on pension assets, retail investors and the real economy, and to avoid negative consequences".1 It is becoming clear that this promise is untenable. In fact, a financial transaction tax is incapable of sensibly and expediently fulfilling any of the three necessary functions of a tax: financing, distribution and steering.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Towards a Just Peace in the Middle East
    KAIROS Policy Briefing Papers are written to help inform public debate on key domestic and foreign policy issues No. 16 February 2009 What Kind of a “New” Bretton Woods will Emerge from the Crisis? John Dillon s the world undergoes the greatest financial tutions not only failed to prevent the current crisis crisis since the 1930s, political leaders of but also contributed to it by encouraging the deregu- Avarious persuasions have been talking about lation and liberalization of financial markets. convening a new Bretton Woods conference to re- The original Bretton Woods conference estab- design the global financial system. The rhetorical lished the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to calls for a new Bretton Woods sound appealing. But oversee the financial system and the International it is not at all clear whether a new, more just and Bank for Reconstruction and Development (now sustainable order will emerge. Currently minor re- known as the World Bank) to assist with post-war forms that will only shore up an unjust economic reconstruction. Over their 64 years of existence order seem more likely. these two institutions have evolved in directions In this briefing paper we shall first look at how that would not be recognizable by their founders. the monetary system established at Bretton Woods, The IMF no longer has sufficient resources to act as New Hampshire in 1944 that had achieved relative a true lender of last resort. The World Bank has stability broke down in the early 1970s and was re- strayed from its mandate of funding genuine social placed by deregulated financial markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..136 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 144 Ï NUMBER 060 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 40th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, May 25, 2009 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 3639 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, May 25, 2009 The House met at 11 a.m. GOVERNMENT ORDERS Ï (1200) Prayers [English] CANADA-COLOMBIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT Ï (1105) IMPLEMENTATION ACT [Translation] Hon. Stockwell Day (Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway, CPC) moved that Bill VACANCY C-23, An Act to implement the Free Trade Agreement between MONTMAGNY—L'ISLET—KAMOURASKA—RIVIÈRE-DU-LOUP Canada and the Republic of Colombia, the Agreement on the The Speaker: It is my duty to inform the House that a vacancy Environment between Canada and the Republic of Colombia and the has occurred in the representation, namely Paul Crête, member for Agreement on Labour Cooperation between Canada and the the electoral district of Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Riv- Republic of Colombia, be read the second time and referred to a ière-du-Loup, by resignation effective May 21, 2009. committee. [English] He said: Mr. Speaker, I thank the House for the opportunity to address issues related to what I believe and what many people Pursuant to subsection 25(1)(b) and subsection 26(1) of the believe is an important government initiative, and that is the Parliament of Canada Act, a warrant has been addressed to the Chief establishment of a formal free trade agreement with Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Transaction Tax: Review and Assessment
    CPB Discussion Paper | 202 Financial transaction tax: review and assessment Jürgen Anthony Michiel Bijlsma Adam Elbourne Marcel Lever Gijsbert Zwart Financial transaction tax: review and assessment Jürgen Anthony *, Michiel Bijlsma †, Adam Elbourne ‡, Marcel Lever § and Gijsbert Zwart ** January 16, 2012 Abstract We explore whether a Financial Transactions Tax (FTT) is likely to correct the market failures that have contributed to the financial crisis, to what extent FTT succeeds in raising revenues, and how the FTT compares to alternative taxes in terms of efficiency. We find little evidence that the FTT will be effective in correcting market failures. Taxing of transactions is not well targeted at behaviour that leads to excessive risk and systemic risk creation. The empirical evidence does not suggest that the introduction of an FTT reduces volatility or asset price bubbles. An FTT will likely raise significant revenues and we estimate those revenues for the Netherlands. In the short term, the incidence of the tax will be chiefly on the current holders of securities. Ultimately, the tax will be borne in part by end users, and we estimate the likely effects on economic growth. When compared to alternative forms of taxation of the financial sector, the FTT is likely less efficient given the amount of revenues. In particular, taxes that more directly address existing distortions, such as the current VAT exemption for banks, and the bias towards debt financing, provide more efficient alternatives. Keywords: Financial transaction tax, Tobin
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Currency Crises Arise and How Could They Be Avoided?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Aschinger, Gerhard Article — Digitized Version Why do currency crises arise and how could they be avoided? Intereconomics Suggested Citation: Aschinger, Gerhard (2001) : Why do currency crises arise and how could they be avoided?, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, Springer, Heidelberg, Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp. 152-159 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41119 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu INTERNATIONAL TRADE American countries except the largest. In 1995, the. not only remain, it will become larger. Nor will this Equivalent Producer Subsidy represented 41 % of the asymmetry abate if Latin America keeps exporting production value of these products.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Transactions Are So Mobile That an FTT in One Country Is Unenforceable and Will Simply Result in Trading Moving Overseas
    FACTS & MYTHS ABOUT A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAX Updated May 2013 What is a financial transaction tax (FTT)? The FTT (also known as a financial speculation tax , Wall Street trading tax, or Robin Hood tax) is a tiny fee – at rates of a fraction of a percent – on Wall Street trading of financial instruments such as stocks, bonds, derivatives, futures, options, and credit default swaps. What are the key facts about the FTT? • An FTT would raise at least tens of billions of dollars per year in badly needed revenue. This is a substantial amount, skimming the fat off of a sector of the economy that can afford to pay it. Some other revenue-raising options being discussed (such as a value-added tax) would fall much more on the middle class. • An FTT would reduce dangerous financial market speculation. Since it would hit high-volume, high-speed trading the hardest, the FTT would serve to discourage short-term speculation in financial markets as well as the proliferation of ever more complex derivatives. • An FTT would encourage longer-term productive investment. By reducing the volume and profitability of short-term trading that serves no productive purpose, the FTT would encourage Wall Street to find new ways to make money from longer-term productive investments. • An FTT would put Wall Street to work for Main Street. Reckless Wall Street gambling cost Americans trillions in bailouts, lost jobs and wealth, and cost states billions in lost revenue. The FTT would help put Wall Street to work rebuilding Main Street with revenue to create potentially hundreds of thousands of jobs and support critical public services and infrastructure.
    [Show full text]