The Others Case Studies of Conflict and Human Rights in Indian States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Others Case Studies of Conflict and Human Rights in Indian States THE OTHERS Case Studies of Conflict and Human Rights in Indian States The Others: Case Studies of Conflict and Human Rights in Indian States July 2014 © Socio Legal Information Centre* Edited by Meha Khanduri and Preeti Verma Fact Finding & Field Research by HRLN Assam: Advocate Raju Doley, Sanjai Sharma, Pabitra Hazarika, Advocate Doma Tshering Bhutia, Rosemary Dzuvichu. HRLN Jharkhand: Advocate Ahmed Raza, Advocate Anup Kumar Agarwal, Saurabh Naruka, Advocate Rohit Thakur, Advocate Shadab Ansari, Advocate Santosh Singh & Sheshnath Vernwal. HRLN Jammu & Kashmir: Khair Un Nisa, & Advocate. HRLN Manipur: Advocate Meihoubam Rakesh. HRLN Andhra Pradesh: Hema Peddireddy, S. Ramya Sruthi. HRLN Chhattisgarh: Rajni Soren, Kishore, Narayan HRLN Odisha: Advocate Saroj Kumar Padhy, Mathew Jacob, Bibhu Prasad Chhualsingh & Sudhakar Senapati. Punjab: Advocate Veena Kumari & Advocate Jublee Momalia. Copy Editing & Research by Samapika Mishra, Ankur Gupta, Bradley Spence Jones, Manish, Rahul Adwani Nitika Khaita, Christopher Lamoureux, Rupesh Kumar, Madhuparna Dutta and Nishi Yadav. Design Guddu Kumar Printed at Print Graphics, Ramesh Market, New Delhi 110065 Published by Human Rights Law Network (HRLN) (A division of Socio Legal Information Centre) 576, Masjid Road, Jangpura, New Delhi – 110014, India Ph: +91-11-24379855/56 E-mail: [email protected] Supported by EIDHR Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are not necessarily views of the HRLN. Every effort has been made to avoid errors, omissions, and inaccuracies. However, for inadvertent errors or discrepancies that may remain nonetheless, the HRLN takes the sole responsibility. * Any section of this volume may be reproduced without prior permission of the Human Rights Law Network for public interest purposes with appropriate acknowledgement. Acknowledgements e would like to express our thanks to our state units Win Assam, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jammu& Kashmir, Jharkhand, Manipur, Odisha and Punjab for conducting these fact findings, often working in isolated regions and in conditions of extreme danger to bring to light injustices against fellow citizens. We also owe a debt of gratitude to our wonderfully hardworking and talented law students and research scholars who provided invaluable help in researching, editing, and compiling this book. iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AFSPA Armed Forces Special Powers Act ASHA Accredited Social Health Activist BNHS Bombay Natural History Society BPL Below Poverty Line BTAD Bodoland Territorial Administered District C.I.D Crime Investigation Department CBI Central Bureau of Investigation CO Circle Officer CoBRA Commando Battalion for Resolute Action CRPF Central Reserve Police Force CSO Civil Society Organisation DC Deputy Commissioner DCP Deputy Commissioner of Police DGP Director General of Police EFLU English and Foreign Language University FAO Food and Agricultural Organization FFT Fact-Finding Team FIR First Information Report HDI Human Development Index HRD Human Resource Development HRHM National Rural Health Mission iv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS HRLN Human Rights Law Network IBA Important Bird Area IED Improvised Explosive Device JKLF Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front KCC Kisan Credit Card KPLT Karbi People’s Liberation Tigers LPG Liquid Petroleum Gas MLA Member of Legislative Assembly MNC Multi National Corporation MoEF Ministry of Environment & Forests NALCO National Aluminum Company Limited NREGA National Rural Employment Guarantee Act OBC Other Backward Caste PLGA People’s Liberation Guerilla Army PREPAK People’s Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak PSA Public Safety Act PTG Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups PUCL People’s Union for Civil Liberties RNHPF Rengma Nagma Hill Protection Force SC Scheduled Caste SEZ Special Economic Zone SHO Station House Officer SI Sub Inspector SIT Special Investigation Team SKIMS Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences SP Superintendent of Police SPO Special Police Officers ST Scheduled Tribe v THE OTHERS TADA Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act UAPA Unlawful Activities Prevention Act ULFA United Liberation Front of Assam UNLF United National Liberation Front VC Vice Chancellor VDC Village Defense Committee WRSU Western Rengma Students Union BILT Ballarpur Industries Ltd IIC Inspector In Charge BSF Border Security Force BDO Block Development Officer NFBS National Family Benefit Scheme NHRC National Human Rights Commission POSCO Pohang Steel Company of Korea PPSS Posco Pratirodh Sangram Samiti MOU Memorandum of Understanding vi Introduction he Indian Constitution guarantees equal rights to all its Tcitizens; however guarantees do not always translate into equal rights in the real world. While India rightly takes pride in being world’s largest democracy and its creed of non-violence, these are apparent more in principle than in action. This book is a compilation of fact-findings conducted in the states of Assam, Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Jammu & Kashmir, Manipur, Punjab and Odisha. For varying reasons, such as strategic geo-political location, large scale extraction of natural resources by corporate interests, or the presence of self-determination groups, these areas have witnessed exploitation, state repression, armed struggle, environmental degradation and mass displacement of local communities. Jammu & Kashmir has a long and complex history of political strife and armed struggle against the state. The constant and large-scale presence of security forces has further contributed to institutional repression. Killings, tortures, state brutality, victimization by the militia and police as well as vii THE OTHERS stagnant economies nearly always accompany such internal conflicts. They often give rise to appalling scenarios where even children are considered enemies of the State. The social fabric has been deeply damaged and one hears of terms such as the ‘half widows of Kashmir’- women whose men have disappeared, either shot dead by security forces or a part of the militia. Citizens are helplessly trapped between inexorable forces, such as the people of Chhattisgarh who have to survive between the conflicting demands of the Salwa Judum and the Naxalites, the former an extra judicial militia alleged to be supported by the authorities, the latter armed rebels committed to creating a new system of governance. In such instances rights taken for granted by the rest of the country are denied to the marginalized people of these regions. Assam, the largest among the Northeastern states, is a beautiful land of heterogeneous cultures and complex ethnicities. However in the crossfire between the militant groups and state authorities, human rights of citizens are the first casualty. The assertion of tribal identity and increasing animosity against refugees has resulted in frequent inter-tribal and inter religious violence in the state. In April 2014, Assam witnessed extreme violence against Muslims in the Kokrajhar district where unarmed women and children were massacred. A direct consequence of the numerous conflicts in Assam has been an abnormally large number of internally displaced people living in ill equipped relief camps. Many of the fact- findings in Assam look into the conditions of the refugee camps. Manipur too suffers from inter-ethnic tensions between different tribes, and between the tribals and non-tribals. At the viii INTRODUCTION root of such tensions are issues of land, immigration, settlement and identity. The past several decades have witnessed a strong self-determination movement in Manipur. Manipur has been declared a ‘disturbed area’ with Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) enforced in the state. AFSPA has facilitated the commission of human right violations including illegal detention, torture and extra judicial killings. The fact-findings carried out in Manipur team thus mostly deal with the brutal effects of this Act. Jharkhand, one of the newest states of India, known as the ‘Land of forests’ is blessed with vast mineral reserves of iron, ores, copper, aluminium, and uranium among others. However, the adivasis, the original inheritors of the land, have been reduced to manual labourers in the state. About half of the state’s population lives below the poverty line. High levels of poverty have pushed women into sex work and children into child labour. The dual presence of mineral wealth and cheap labour has led to illegal mining by large corporations. Adivasi communities have vigorously resisted land acquisition and large projects that are seen to further perpetuate economic inequities. Corporations have often turned to the state government and police force for assistance against popular people’s movements. The fact-findings in Jharkhand deal with the violation of civil and political rights of villagers; state repression; custodial deaths; and human trafficking. Punjab, was among the earliest regions to grapple with the repressive might of the State in view of a the self-determination struggle. While militancy has left an indelible mark on the state, and the battle to get justice for the gross human right violations of the 80s and 90s goes on, Punjab’s current plight is a result of what might be called its rapid and unsustainable economic ix THE OTHERS development. The state today boasts of the highest per capita income in the country, and one third of its population is urban. However ironically one out of every seven urban resident of Punjab lives in slums, often in unhygienic living areas with no facilities for children or pregnant
Recommended publications
  • Judicial Review Under Indian Constitution: Its Reach and Contents
    JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER INDIAN CONSTITUTION: ITS REACH AND CONTENTS A Thesis Submitted to the University of North Bengal For the Award of Doctor of Philosophy In Department of Law SUBMITTED BY SANGEETA MANDAL SUPERVISOR PROF. (DR.) RATHIN BANDYOPADHYAY DEPARTMENT OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF NORTH BENGAL RAJA RAMMOHANPUR, DARJEELING WEST BENGAL NOVEMBER, 2017 ABSTRACT Our Constitution has incorporated the provision of the judicial review into itself. To safeguard the liberty and rights of individuals, the judicial review is recognized as necessary and a basic requirement for construction up of a novel civilization, which is constructed on the perception of community and well-being morals. The powers of judicial review are vested significantly by means of the higher judiciary of states and the Supreme Court of India. The privileges of persons are sure fire in the transcription of the Constitution of India. This research paper analyses the role of Indian Judiciary in the establishment of an orderly and civilised society. In the actions of a Welfare State, the constitutional mandates occupy predominant position even in administrative matters. It operates in public domain and in appropriate cases constitutes substantive and enforceable right. This work throws light upon the new legal order which has influenced the administrative process greatly. An attempt has been made researcher to analyse the role of judiciary in India in checking the growing abuse of administrative powers and in this process role of judiciary in United Kingdom in developing this doctrine has also been studied. It reflects how reasonable opportunity of being heard is given to the affected parties against administrative action, although it does not create any legal right as such.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable in the Supreme Court of India Civil
    Civil Appeal No. 2732 of 2020 (arising out of SLP(C)No.11295 of 2011) etc. Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Thr. LRs. & Anr. vs. State of Kerala and ors. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/CIVIL ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.2732 OF 2020 [Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.11295 of 2011] SRI MARTHANDA VARMA (D) THR. LRs. & ANR. …Appellants VERSUS STATE OF KERALA & ORS. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2733 OF 2020 [Arising Out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.12361 of 2011] AND WRIT PETITION(C) No.518 OF 2011 AND CONMT. PET.(C) No.493 OF 2019 IN SLP(C) No.12361 OF 2011 Civil Appeal No. 2732 of 2020 (arising out of SLP(C)No.11295 of 2011) etc. Sri Marthanda Varma (D) Thr. LRs. & Anr. vs. State of Kerala and ors. 2 J U D G M E N T Uday Umesh Lalit, J. 1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.11295 of 2011 and Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.12361 of 2011. 2. Sree Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma who as Ruler of Covenanting State of Travancore had entered into a Covenant in May 1949 with the Government of India leading to the formation of the United State of Travancore and Cochin, died on 19.07.1991. His younger brother Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma and the Executive Officer of Sri Padmanabhaswamy Temple, Thiruvananthapuram (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Temple’) as appellants 1 and 2 respectively have filed these appeals challenging the judgment and order dated 31.01.2011 passed by the High Court1 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.36487 of 2009 and in Writ Petition (Civil) No.4256 of 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Gopal Subramanium
    3 Verulam Buildings WC1R 5NT DX: LDE 331 Gray’s Inn, London. Telephone: +44(0)20 7831 8441 Barristers regulated by the Bar Standards Board Gopal Subramanium Email Address: [email protected] One of the most talented jurists that India has produced in recent times, Gopal Subramanium was born in 1958 in Bangalore. He completed his schooling from St. Xavier's School, New Delhi, closely followed by a degree in law from the University of Delhi. Gopal commenced his legal practice in 1980 in the Supreme Court of India, under the guidance of Mr. Soli J. Sorabjee, jurist & former Attorney General for India. In 1993, he was designated a Senior Advocate (the equivalent of a Queen's Counsel in the UK) suo motu by the Supreme Court, one of the youngest to be designated in the Supreme Court's history. In 2005, Gopal was appointed Additional Solicitor General of India. He went on to serve as Solicitor General of India between 2009 and 2011. During his tenure as a law officer, he was honoured with the National Law Day Award for Outstanding Jurist, presented to him in 2009 by the President of India, for his consistent professional excellence and adherence to the highest traditions of the Bar. Gopal continues to act as lead counsel in several path-breaking matters. He acted as lead counsel for Novartis AG in Novartis' challenge before the Supreme Court to a denial to grant it an Indian patent for the cancer drug ‘Glivec'. Gopal’s arbitration experience includes appearing as lead counsel for Indian companies in ICC and domestic arbitrations.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA LIST of SENIOR ADVOCATES DESIGNATED by SUPREME COURT (As on 29.03.2019)
    WWW.LIVELAW.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF SENIOR ADVOCATES DESIGNATED BY SUPREME COURT (as on 29.03.2019) S.No. Name Address Date of Remarks designation as Senior Advocate 1 Mr. Ramachandra Martand 89, Shahjahan Road, New 28-3-1966 Retd Judge Bombay H/C Hajarnavis Delhi. 2 Mr. Hari Ramchandra Gokhle Rocky Hill Flats, N. Dabholkar 23-7-1966 Advocate Road, Bombay-6 3 Mr. G. R. Rajagopaul C-53, South Extn. Part-1, New 03-10-1966 Advocate Delhi 4 Dr. V. A. Sayed Muhammad Address not available 07-11-1966 Adv. General 5 Mr. N. D. Khar Khanis 122, Golf Links, N.D. 07-10-1967 Advocate 6 Mr. P. Govinda Menon 2, Hastings Road, New Delhi 06-03-1968 Advocate 7 Dr. Haji N. A. Noor P.O. Box 24, MOGADISCIO 02-1-1969 Advocate Mohammed 8 Mr. Moinul Hague Chaudhury Dr. S. K. Bhuniya Road, 12-12-1969 Advocate Gauhati-I, Assam 9 Mr. B. K. P. Sinha 206, Vithalbhai Patel House, 16-3-1970 Advocate Rafi Marg, N. Delhi. 10 Mr. P. Ramachandra Reddy Srinivas, Hardikar Bagh, 19-8-1970 Adv. Genl Himatat Nagar, Hyderabad 11 Mr. Brijbans Kishore “The River Side” 10 Ram 02-4-1970 Advocate Kishore Marg, Delhi-6 12 Mr. B. V. Subrahmanyam 106, Golf Links, New Delhi 27-4-1970 Adv. General 13 Mr. Jaisukh Lal Hathi 11, Ashoka Road,New Delhi 10-9-1970 Advocate * Names of those Sr. Advocates have been deleted whose death has been intimated to the Registry. Concerned Bar Associations/Sr. Advocates are requested to intimate their present Contact No.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper – LB-601 Advocacy, Professional Ethics and Accountancy for Lawyers
    LL.B. VI TERM Paper – LB-601 Advocacy, Professional Ethics and Accountancy for Lawyers Course Materials Prepared by Madhu Bhatti Ankeeta Gupta Mehpara Haq Faculty of Law University of Delhi Delhi – 110007 2017 For Private Circulation Only 1 LL.B. VI TERM Paper – LB-601 Advocacy, Professional Ethics and Accountancy for Lawyers Objectives of the Course: Professional ethics form the foundation in the lives of the lawyers. Every person has been given the right to engage a lawyer of their choice to represent their case. It means that lawyers have the constitutional obligation to take up the case of every person who approaches them for legal representation. Does it mean that the lawyer is obligated to represent a self-confessed murderer, rapist, and other accused persons who are alleged to have committed very serious offences against the nation even though his conscience or his personal beliefs do not permit that? How can the lawyer do that when his inner conscience revolts at the thought of represent a certain category of persons? All clients approach the lawyer with hope and desire that their lawyers will zealously represent their case. Does zealous representation mean that the lawyers must get the relief sought by the clients by all means? Are there any boundaries set by law or professional ethics that a lawyer must not cross? What is the role of truth and morality in determining the standards of professional ethics for lawyers? What conduct amounts to professional misconduct? What are the repercussions if a lawyer does not follows the principles of professional ethics? What are the mechanisms set by law to deal with complaints of professional misconduct? These and many other similar other questions trouble the mind of new entrants to law practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyers' Musings
    The Student Lawyers’ Musings Vol. 5, Issue I December 2018 Magazine Committee Advisor Designers Ebad Ur Rahman Dr. Jagan Mohan Rao Subham Kumar Dalara An ICFAI Law School Publication Contents Am I taking Advantage of the Digital Revolution? -Hemanth Ram Reddy Corporate Governance in India -Rashmi Jain Cruel Reality of the Modern World-Domestic Violence -Savitri Varanasi Sabarimala-A Splintered Reason under Law -Dr. M. Madhuri Irene Lament for India‘s Daughters -G.S.S. Neeharika Hon‘ble Chief Justice of India Shri Ranjan Gogoi Legal Eagles -Subham Kumar Dalara Forever -Disha Roy You Question Me Every Instant -Mirza Ghalib -Ebad Ur Rahman Arcane of Seasons -G.S.S. Neeharika Being in ICFAI -Shailja Mishra -Hansika Om Krishna and his Butter -M.S. Radhika AM I TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION? - Hemanth Ram Reddy Hemanth is a first year student of BBA-LLB. He is very passionate about movie direction and story writing. He has a special interest for literature. He hopes to con- tinue his studies in the area of films. With every click, every tweet, every share, am I being exploited or am I taking ad- vantage of the digital revolution? This is the question I kept asking myself as I read Astra Taylor's "The People's Platform: Taking Back Power and Culture in the Digital Age." Taylor makes a thorough case that the technological advances we've been told constitute progress — that anyone can start a blog, that we can easily keep up with our friends (and frenemies) on Facebook, that Twitter can foment democratic revolution — are actually masking and, in some cases, exacerbating social ills that have long plagued our society, especially its most creative members.
    [Show full text]
  • Commencement Lecture by Mr. Gopal Subramanium
    Commencement of the Academic Session 2017 - 2018 of Jindal Global Law School Wednesday, 2 August 2017, 5:00 pm – 6:30 pm Convention Hall, T3, Ground Floor NAAC Accreditation - 'A' Grade O.P. Jindal Global University Sonipat Narela Road, Sonipat - 131001, Haryana (NCR of Delhi) You are cordially invited to theCommencement Lecture on on “The Rule of Law in a Constitutional Democracy” by Mr. Gopal Subramanium Senior Advocate Supreme Court of India Mr. Gopal Subramanium is a Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court of India. After completing a degree in law from the University of Delhi, he began his career in 1980 at the Chambers of Mr. Soli Sorabjee. In the early years of his career, he acted as Standing Counsel for the Union of India before the Supreme Court and was also retained by M/S Amarchand Mangaldas & Hira Lal Shroff & Co. In 1993, he was designated Senior Advocate suo moto by the Supreme Court, one of the youngest in India's history to receive the designation. Mr. Subramanium served as Additional Solicitor General of India from 2005 to 2009. He served as Solicitor General of India from 2009 to 2011, during which period he was also Chairman of the Bar Council of India. Mr. Subramanium has appeared in a number of notable commercial and criminal cases, and cases of significant constitutional importance. In Devidas Ramchander Tuljapurkar, he argued for greater literary and artistic freedom. In Bachpan Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, he submitted a report titled “The Indian Child: India's Eternal Hope and Future” which devised plans to curb immoral trafficking, slavery and begging amongst children.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Continuities: Human Rights, Terrorism, and Security Laws in India
    COLONIAL CONTINUITIES: HUMAN RIGHTS, TERRORISM, AND SECURITY LAWS IN INDIA * ** *** ANIL KALHAN , GERALD P. CONROY , MAMTA KAUSHAL , **** ***** SAM SCOTT MILLER , AND JED S. RAKOFF ACRONYMS AND OTHER REFERENCES................................................95 SUMMARY.......................................................................................................96 I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................99 II. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................110 A. POLICE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FRAMEWORK ...............................110 B. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ....................116 1. Indian Constitution...................................................................116 2. Statutes and Procedural Rules.................................................118 3. International Law.....................................................................120 4. International Human Rights Norms and Indian Domestic Law ...........................................................................................123 III. EMERGENCY AND SECURITY LAWS BEFORE 1980 ..............125 A. BRITISH COLONIAL EMERGENCY AND SECURITY LAWS ................126 B. EMERGENCY AND SECURITY LAWS FROM 1947 TO 1975...............132 * Visiting Assistant Professor, Fordham Law School (2006-present); Associate in Law, Columbia Law School (2004-06). Chair, India Project, Committee on International Human Rights, Association of the Bar of the City of
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA LIST of SENIOR ADVOCATES DESIGNATED by SUPREME COURT (As on 29.03.2019)
    LatestLaws.com SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LIST OF SENIOR ADVOCATES DESIGNATED BY SUPREME COURT (as on 29.03.2019) S.No. Name Address Date of Remarks designation as Senior Advocate 1 Mr. Ramachandra Martand 89, Shahjahan Road, New 28-3-1966 Retd Judge Bombay H/C Hajarnavis Delhi. 2 Mr. Hari Ramchandra Gokhle Rocky Hill Flats, N. Dabholkar 23-7-1966 Advocate Road, Bombay-6 3 Mr. G. R. Rajagopaul C-53, South Extn. Part-1, New 03-10-1966 Advocate Delhi 4 Dr. V. A. Sayed Muhammad Address not available 07-11-1966 Adv. General 5 Mr. N. D. Khar Khanis 122, Golf Links, N.D. 07-10-1967 Advocate 6 Mr. P. Govinda Menon 2, Hastings Road, New Delhi 06-03-1968 Advocate 7 Dr. Haji N. A. Noor P.O. Box 24, MOGADISCIO 02-1-1969 Advocate Mohammed 8 Mr. Moinul Hague Chaudhury Dr. S. K. Bhuniya Road, 12-12-1969 Advocate Gauhati-I, Assam 9 Mr. B. K. P. Sinha 206, Vithalbhai Patel House, 16-3-1970 Advocate Rafi Marg, N. Delhi. 10 Mr. P. Ramachandra Reddy Srinivas, Hardikar Bagh, 19-8-1970 Adv. Genl Himatat Nagar, Hyderabad 11 Mr. Brijbans Kishore “The River Side” 10 Ram 02-4-1970 Advocate Kishore Marg, Delhi-6 12 Mr. B. V. Subrahmanyam 106, Golf Links, New Delhi 27-4-1970 Adv. General 13 Mr. Jaisukh Lal Hathi 11, Ashoka Road,New Delhi 10-9-1970 Advocate * Names of those Sr. Advocates have been deleted whose death has been intimated to the Registry. Concerned Bar Associations/Sr. Advocates are requested to intimate their present Contact No.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Implications of National Security Laws in India: Combating Terrorism While Perserving Civil Liberties
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 33 Number 2 Spring Article 3 April 2020 Human Rights Implications of National Security Laws in India: Combating Terrorism While Perserving Civil Liberties C. Raj Kumar Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation C. Raj Kumar, Human Rights Implications of National Security Laws in India: Combating Terrorism While Perserving Civil Liberties, 33 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 195 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS OF NATIONAL SECURITY LAWS IN INDIA: COMBATING TERRORISM WHILE PRESERVING CIVIL LIBERTIES C. RAJ KUMAR* "Liberty is itself the gift of the law and may by the law [be]forfeited or abridged.,' "[Tihe principle that no one shall be deprived of his lifeand liberty without the authority of law was not the gift of the Constitution. It was a necessary [corollary] of the concept relating to sanctity of life and liberty; it existed and was in force before the coming intoforce of the Constitution." 2 I. INTRODUCTION The September 11, 2001 attacks in New York and Washington D.C.,3 and the December 13, 2001 attack on the Indian Parliament4 have intensified the debate regarding the necessity of formulating national security laws in India and the laws' potentially serious impact on human rights and civil liberties.5 The strengthening of national security laws6 worldwide is apparently pursued with the objective of * B.Com.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Away from the Death Penalty
    MOVING AWAY FROM THE DEATH PENALTY Arguments, Trends and Perspectives Moving Away from the Death Penalty: Arguments, Trends and Perspectives MOVING AWAY FROM THE DEATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS, TRENDS AND PERSPECTIVES MOVING AWAY FROM THE DEATH PENALTY: ARGUMENTS, TRENDS AND PERSPECTIVES © 2015 United Nations Worldwide rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the author(s), editor, or the publisher, except as permitted by law. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Editor: Ivan Šimonovi´c Design and layout: dammsavage studio Cover image: The cover features an adaptation of a photograph of the feet of a man convicted of murder, seen during a hanging. Photo credit: EPA/Raed Qutena. The back cover graphic line represents a declining percentage of United Nations Member New York, 2015 States that practice the death penalty (those that have not abolished it in law or practice), from 89% in 1975, ending at 27% in 2015, in 10 year increments. Electronic version of this publication is available at: www.ohchr.org/EN/NewYork/Pages/Resources.aspx
    [Show full text]
  • 13 SCR 1 Essentially a Quasi-Judicial Forum, the Chief Information
    [2013] 13 S.C.R. 1 2 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 13 S.C.R. NAMIT SHARMA A A essentially a quasi-judicial forum, the Chief Information v. Commissioner and members of the Commission should be UNION OF INDIA the persons possessing requisite qualification and experience (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 210 of 2012) in the field of Law and/or other specified fields - The Commission to work in a bench of two i.e. a ‘judicial member’ SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 B B and an expert member’ - Appointment to the post of judicial [A.K. PATNAIK AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] member should be made in consultation’ with the Chief Justice of India in case of Central Information Commission and with Right to Information Act, 2005: the Chief Justices of the High Courts of the respective States in case of State Information Commissions - The term ss. 12(5), (6) and 15(5), (6) - Appointment to the post of C C experience in law and other specified field as enumerated u/ Chief Information Commissioners and Information ss. 12(5) and 15(5) of the Act would take within its ambit both- Commissioners at Central as well as State Level - Eligibility requisite qualification as well as experience in that field –A criteria - Constitutional validity of - Held: The provisions of ss. Law Officer or a lawyer having twenty years of law practice and 12(5) and 15(5) are constitutionally valid with a rider that the having experience of social work is also eligible for court will have to read into the provisions that the expression appointment as judicial member - For appointment as D D ‘knowledge
    [Show full text]