Life History & Ecology of the Wood Stork (Mycteria Americana)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Life History & Ecology of the Wood Stork (Mycteria Americana) LifeLife HistoryHistory && EcologyEcology ofof thethe WoodWood StorkStork ((MycteriaMycteria americana)americana) Dr. Shawn Liston Research Manager, SW Region Hart Rufe, St. Lucie Audubon WoodWood StorkStork MycteriaMycteria americanaamericana “Wood Ibis” • Only stork species currently breeding in the U.S. • Largest breeding colony in the northern hemisphere @ Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary • LENGTH: 33 ½ - 45 ½ inches • WINGSPAN: 59 – 69 inches • WEIGHT: 72 – 93 ounces (4 ½ - 5 ¾ lbs) HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS Wood Stork Mycteria americana • Often take advantage of atmospheric thermals – conserves energy (16.0 J/m flapping vs. 1.9 J/m soaring) • Heights over 1,000 m; travel over 40 km to feeding sites • When thermal updrafts are strong, WOST can glide 16-24 km (10-15 mi) with wings motionless HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS WoodWood StorkStork MycteriaMycteria americanaamericana Milky Stork Painted Stork Yellow-billed Stork (M. cinerea) (M. leucocephala) (M. ibis) HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS Historically,Historically, USUS populationpopulation summerssummers inin GAGA && SCSC andand winterswinters inin FLFL www.seaturtle.org HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS COLONYCOLONY SITESSITES FreshwaterFreshwater && marine-estuarinemarine-estuarine forestedforested habitatshabitats InundationInundation ofof treestrees detersdeters nestnest predationpredation HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS MonogomousMonogomous PairPair bondsbonds likelylikely dodo notnot endureendure forfor moremore thanthan aa singlesingle seasonseason NoNo apparentapparent sitesite fidelityfidelity fromfrom yearyear toto yearyear MaleMale establishesestablishes nestnest sitesite andand courtscourts femalesfemales CourtshipCourtship lastslasts hourshours toto daysdays MaleMale usuallyusually initiatesinitiates nestnest constructionconstruction HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS MostMost oftenoften nestnest inin mixed-speciesmixed-species coloniescolonies (esp.(esp. ANH,ANH, GREG,GREG, GBH)GBH) ClutchClutch size:size: 2-52-5 eggseggs MaleMale && femalefemale tendtend nestsnests (equally)(equally) IfIf 11 adultadult isis lostlost oror abandons,abandons, otherother adultadult maymay incubateincubate 2-32-3 daysdays beforebefore abandoningabandoning IncubationIncubation lastslasts 27-3227-32 daysdays NestsNests attendedattended byby atat leastleast 11 parentparent full-full- timetime untiluntil chickschicks areare ~20~20 dd oldold YoungYoung 50-6050-60 dd oldold beginbegin toto leaveleave nestnest FledgeFledge raterate varies:varies: averageaverage 1.2-2.91.2-2.9 fl/nestfl/nest HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS 2 WKS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS 4 WKS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS 6 WKS HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS FLEDGED HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS TheseThese littlelittle guysguys growgrow quicklyquickly andand needneed lotslots ofof food…food… HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS FEEDINGFEEDING SITESSITES NaturalNatural && artificialartificial wetlandswetlands (water(water depthdepth 10-3010-30 cm)cm) HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS Feed using TACTILOCATION (sim. to WHIB, GLIB, ROSP) WOST bill snap is one of the fastest reflex actions among vertebrates (~25 milliseconds) OftenOften useuse foot-stirringfoot-stirring and/orand/or wing-flickingwing-flicking FeedFeed singly,singly, inin groups,groups, inin single-filesingle-file lines,lines, inin mixedmixed speciesspecies aggregationsaggregations HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS ENERGYENERGY REQUIREMENTSREQUIREMENTS Chicks require ~16.5 kg food from hatching to fledging Adults require ~0.52 kg/bird/d (courtship, nest building, incubation, caring for chicks) x 120 d Small colony (100 pairs): 2 adults/nest fledging 1.5 fledglings/nest requires ~15,000 kg of food 1961 & 1966 CSS colony (6,000 pairs) required 440 lbs food/nest = ~2.6 million kg of food (estimates probably low- do not consider many factors) HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS Quite particular about water depth & prey density (Gawlik 2002) HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS Appear to remove larger prey first Frequency distributions of fish length (SL, mm) collected in 1-m2 throw trap on successive days of heavy wading bird foraging Not true prey “Day 1” = 3/13/09, “Day 4” = 3/16/2009 (bars represent 1 mm size classes) preference (tactile feeders cannot be 200 120 selective) 100 Likely an artifact of 150 F 1 r e y 80 prey behavior q a u e D n – c y y c 100 60 – n e D u a q y e r 40 4 F 50 20 Day 1 0 0 Day 4 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Fish Length (SL, mm) HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS Literature suggests diet is primarily fish Ideally: fish 2-10 cm OpportunisticOpportunistic:: alsoalso consumeconsume plantplant material,material, insects,insects, snails,snails, crayfish,crayfish, grassgrass shrimp,shrimp, amphibians,amphibians, reptiles,reptiles, smallsmall mammals,mammals, mammalmammal dungdung HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS OurOur datadata suggestsuggest crayfishcrayfish areare likelylikely anan importantimportant dietdiet componentcomponent inin thethe wetwet seasonseason (October-January)(October-January) HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS CONCEPTUAL ECOLOGICAL MODEL Coastal Salinity Gradients HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS WET SEASON Most of the landscapelandscape isis inundatedinundated Aquatic fauna are dispersed throughout the system HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS As water levels recede, fish instinctivelyinstinctively move toward deeper areas HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS DRY SEASON Fauna become trapped in refuges Wading birds & other predators take advantage of high prey density Crayfish burrow underground HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS From flat sheetflow with shallow dimpled pools to a patchwork of ditches, roads, dikes, deep lakes. This systemic alteration has degraded wetland ecology - from primary productivity to top predators HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS HOW TOID HOW Nest Numbers 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 2000 4000 6000 8000 0 DISTRIBUTION 1958 1960 1962 MIGRATION 1964 Wood Stork Nesting at Corkscrew 1966 1968 1970 NESTING 1972 1974 No. of Nesting Pairs Nesting of No. FEEDING 1976 1978 1980 Year 1982 DIET No. of Birds Fledged Birds of No. 1984 1986 ECOLOGY 1988 1990 1992 1994 IMPACTS 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS Short Hydroperiod Wetlands provide a critical function for Wood Storks and other wading birds • Wetlands available for foraging in Nov/Dec - short hydroperiod wetlands • Productivity plummeted as a result of loss of Nov/Dec foraging habitat • Major shift in nest initiation from Nov/Dec to Jan/Feb in late 70’s • Preservation/restorationPreservation/restoration ofof Nov/DecNov/Dec wetlandswetlands isis vitalvital toto StorkStork recoveryrecovery HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS FutureFuture WOSTWOST populationpopulation trendstrends inin SouthSouth FloridaFlorida If they initiate nesting early (Nov-Dec) 28% increase over next 30 years If they continue to nest late (late Jan-Mar) 38% decrease over next 30 years (unpublished data, Rena Borkataria, UF) HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS Pressure to develop these few remaining short hydroperiod wetlands increases threat to WOST in SW FL HOW TO ID DISTRIBUTION MIGRATION NESTING FEEDING DIET ECOLOGY IMPACTS SpecialSpecial thanksthanks toto JasonJason LauritsenLauritsen (Assistant(Assistant Manager,Manager, CorkscrewCorkscrew SwampSwamp Sanctuary)Sanctuary).
Recommended publications
  • Handling and Intake of Plastic Debris by Wood Storks at an Urban Site in South-Eastern Brazil: Possible Causes and Consequences
    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 11 (2): 372-374 ©NwjZ, Oradea, Romania, 2015 Article No.: 147601 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Handling and intake of plastic debris by Wood Storks at an urban site in South-eastern Brazil: possible causes and consequences Ivan SAZIMA1,* and Giulia B. D’ANGELO2 1. Museu de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. 2. Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970 Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. *Corresponding author, I. Sazima, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 20. September 2014 / Accepted: 12. December 2014 / Available online: 01. November 2015 / Printed: December 2015 Anthropogenic inedible debris increases in the picked pieces of plastic cable were individually identified food chain of seabirds, marine turtles, and by differences on neck feathering and bill colour. cetaceans and becomes a worldwide problem (e.g. Sequenced photographs allowed the timing of the behavioural events for two of these individuals. Denuncio et al. 2011, Avery-Gomm et al. 2013, Throughout the observations, we used the “ad libitum” Schluyter et al. 2013, Donnelly-Greenan et al. 2014, sampling (Altmann 1974), which is adequate to record Provencher et al. 2015), but this material is rarely rare events. reported entering the food chain of inland wildlife (Peris 2003, Booth 2011, Henry et al. 2011). Storks Among small groups of Wood Storks that varied of the genus Ciconia are opportunistic visual from 2 to 8 migrant individuals comprised of up to hunters that prey mostly on fish, frogs, snakes, 2 adults and 6 juveniles, we recorded the small mammals, and a variety of insects (Elliott behaviour of 4 juveniles (subadults sensu Coulton 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of an Extinct Marabou Stork in the Neogene of South America
    First record of an extinct marabou stork in the Neogene of South America JORGE IGNACIO NORIEGA and GERARDO CLADERA Noriega, J.I. and Cladera, G. 2008. First record of an extinct marabou stork in the Neogene of South America. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53 (4): 593–600. We describe a new large species of marabou stork, Leptoptilus patagonicus (Ciconiiformes, Ciconiidae, Leptoptilini), from the late Miocene Puerto Madryn Formation, Chubut Province, Argentina. The specimen consists mainly of wing and leg bones, pelvis, sternum, cervical vertebrae, and a few fragments of the skull. We provisionally adopt the traditional system− atic scheme of ciconiid tribes. The specimen is referred to the Leptoptilini on the basis of similarities in morphology and intramembral proportions with the extant genera Ephippiorhynchus, Jabiru,andLeptoptilos. The fossil specimen resembles in overall morphology and size the species of Leptoptilos, but also exhibits several exclusive characters of the sternum, hu− merus, carpometacarpus, tibiotarsus, and pelvis. Additionally, its wing proportions differ from those of any living taxon, providing support to erect a new species. This is the first record of the tribe Leptoptilini in the Tertiary of South America. Key words: Ciconiidae, Leptoptilos, Miocene, Argentina, South America. Jorge I. Noriega [[email protected]], Laboratorio de Paleontología de Vertebrados, CICYTTP−CONICET, Matteri y España, 3105 Diamante, Argentina; Gerardo Cladera [[email protected]], Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Avenida Fontana 140, 9100 Trelew, Argentina. Introduction Institutional abbreviations.—BMNH, Natural History Mu− seum, London, UK; CICYTTP, Centro de Investigaciones The stork family (Ciconiidae) is a well−defined group of Científicas y Transferencia de Tecnología a la Producción, waterbirds, traditionally divided into three tribes: the Myc− Diamante, Argentina; CNAR−KB3, collections of locality 3 of teriini, the Ciconiini, and the Leptoptilini (Kahl 1971, 1972, the Kossom Bougoudi area, Centre National d’Appui à la 1979).
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Species Accounts from The
    Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book Editors N. J. COLLAR (Editor-in-chief), A. V. ANDREEV, S. CHAN, M. J. CROSBY, S. SUBRAMANYA and J. A. TOBIAS Maps by RUDYANTO and M. J. CROSBY Principal compilers and data contributors ■ BANGLADESH P. Thompson ■ BHUTAN R. Pradhan; C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp ■ CAMBODIA Sun Hean; C. M. Poole ■ CHINA ■ MAINLAND CHINA Zheng Guangmei; Ding Changqing, Gao Wei, Gao Yuren, Li Fulai, Liu Naifa, Ma Zhijun, the late Tan Yaokuang, Wang Qishan, Xu Weishu, Yang Lan, Yu Zhiwei, Zhang Zhengwang. ■ HONG KONG Hong Kong Bird Watching Society (BirdLife Affiliate); H. F. Cheung; F. N. Y. Lock, C. K. W. Ma, Y. T. Yu. ■ TAIWAN Wild Bird Federation of Taiwan (BirdLife Partner); L. Liu Severinghaus; Chang Chin-lung, Chiang Ming-liang, Fang Woei-horng, Ho Yi-hsian, Hwang Kwang-yin, Lin Wei-yuan, Lin Wen-horn, Lo Hung-ren, Sha Chian-chung, Yau Cheng-teh. ■ INDIA Bombay Natural History Society (BirdLife Partner Designate) and Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History; L. Vijayan and V. S. Vijayan; S. Balachandran, R. Bhargava, P. C. Bhattacharjee, S. Bhupathy, A. Chaudhury, P. Gole, S. A. Hussain, R. Kaul, U. Lachungpa, R. Naroji, S. Pandey, A. Pittie, V. Prakash, A. Rahmani, P. Saikia, R. Sankaran, P. Singh, R. Sugathan, Zafar-ul Islam ■ INDONESIA BirdLife International Indonesia Country Programme; Ria Saryanthi; D. Agista, S. van Balen, Y. Cahyadin, R. F. A. Grimmett, F. R. Lambert, M. Poulsen, Rudyanto, I. Setiawan, C. Trainor ■ JAPAN Wild Bird Society of Japan (BirdLife Partner); Y. Fujimaki; Y. Kanai, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Jabiru Mycteria (Jabiru Stork)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology Jabiru mycteria (Jabiru Stork) Family: Ciconiidae (Storks) Order: Ciconiiformes (Storks, Herons and Ibises) Class: Aves (Birds) Fig. 1. Jabiru stork, Jabiru mycteria. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabiru#/media/File:Jabiru_(Jabiru_mycteria)_2.JPG, downloaded 1 March 2017] TRAITS. Jabiru mycteria is one of the largest flying birds on earth, being the largest in the Americas and one of the three stork species found there. Adult jabiru storks can reach 1.2m tall with a wing span of 2.6m. Their bill is large and black, somewhat upturned, with lengths of up to 30cm (Fig. 1). Males are larger than females, and both sexes can be identified by the band of red skin at the base of the neck. Adult storks possess all-white plumage on the body. The head and neck lacks feathers except for a cluster of grey feathers on the back of the head. The juveniles have white feathers with greyish-brown edges (McKinley, 2006; Borjas, 2004). DISTRIBUTION. Jabiru mycteria is native to South American countries such as Argentina, Brazil, Belize, Colombia, Guyana, Honduras, Nicaragua and Venezuela (Fig. 2). Jabirus can have also been sighted in Mexico, Panama, Trinidad and Tobago, Grenada, United States and Uruguay (IUCN, 2016). UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Ecology HABITAT AND ACTIVITY. Jabiru storks are diurnal birds and often feed singly or in pairs but can also be found feeding in large groups (Kahl, 1973). They can be found around coastal lagoons, savannas, marshes and also ponds (Belize Zoo, 2017; Pantanal, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Wood-Stork-2005.Pdf
    WOOD STORK Mycteria americana Photo of adult wood stork in landing posture and chicks in Close-up photo of adult wood stork. nest. Photo courtesy of USFWS/Photo by George Gentry Photo courtesy of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. FAMILY: Ciconiidae STATUS: Endangered - U.S. Breeding Population (Federal Register, February 28, 1984) [Service Proposed for status upgrade to Threatened, December 26, 2013] DESCRIPTION: Wood storks are large, long-legged wading birds, about 45 inches tall, with a wingspan of 60 to 65 inches. The plumage is white except for black primaries and secondaries and a short black tail. The head and neck are largely unfeathered and dark gray in color. The bill is black, thick at the base, and slightly decurved. Immature birds have dingy gray feathers on their head and a yellowish bill. FEEDING HABITS: Small fish from 1 to 6 inches long, especially topminnows and sunfish, provide this bird's primary diet. Wood storks capture their prey by a specialized technique known as grope-feeding or tacto-location. Feeding often occurs in water 6 to 10 inches deep, where a stork probes with the bill partly open. When a fish touches the bill it quickly snaps shut. The average response time of this reflex is 25 milliseconds, making it one of the fastest reflexes known in vertebrates. Wood storks use thermals to soar as far as 80 miles from nesting to feeding areas. Since thermals do not form in early morning, wood storks may arrive at feeding areas later than other wading bird species such as herons.
    [Show full text]
  • Spread-Wing Postures and Their Possible Functions in the Ciconiidae
    THE AUK A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY Von. 88 Oc:roBE'a 1971 No. 4 SPREAD-WING POSTURES AND THEIR POSSIBLE FUNCTIONS IN THE CICONIIDAE M. P. KAI-IL IN two recent papers Clark (19'69) and Curry-Lindahl (1970) have reported spread-wingpostures in storks and other birds and discussed someof the functionsthat they may serve. During recent field studies (1959-69) of all 17 speciesof storks, I have had opportunitiesto observespread-wing postures. in a number of speciesand under different environmentalconditions (Table i). The contextsin which thesepostures occur shed somelight on their possible functions. TYPES OF SPREAD-WING POSTURES Varying degreesof wing spreadingare shownby at least 13 species of storksunder different conditions.In somestorks (e.g. Ciconia nigra, Euxenuragaleata, Ephippiorhynchus senegalensis, and ]abiru mycteria) I observedno spread-wingpostures and have foundno referenceto them in the literature. In the White Stork (Ciconia ciconia) I observedonly a wing-droopingposture--with the wings held a short distanceaway from the sidesand the primaries fanned downward--in migrant birds wetted by a heavy rain at NgorongoroCrater, Tanzania. Other species often openedthe wingsonly part way, in a delta-wingposture (Frontis- piece), in which the forearmsare openedbut the primariesremain folded so that their tips crossin front o.f or below the. tail. In some species (e.g. Ibis leucocephalus)this was the most commonly observedspread- wing posture. All those specieslisted in Table i, with the exception of C. ciconia,at times adopted a full-spreadposture (Figures i, 2, 3), similar to those referred to by Clark (1969) and Curry-Lindahl (1970) in severalgroups of water birds.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Southern Florida Wood Stork Population
    Wilson Bull., 98(3), 1986, pp. 368-386 THE HISTORY OF THE SOUTHERN FLORIDA WOOD STORK POPULATION JAMES A. KUSHLAN AND PAULA C. FROHRING ’ AswnAcr.-The largest segment of the North American Wood Stork (Mycteria ameri- cam) population traditionally nested in southern Florida, where its perceived population decrease over the last 50 years resulted in its addition to the Federal endangered species list. Previously published reports placed the southern Florida population at 30,000 to 100,000 storks. A complete search of published and unpublished records of Wood Storks nesting in southern Florida, however, failed to support such a long-term population decrease. We cannot demonstrate that the historical population was any larger than it was in 1967, when there were 9400 pairs. The Corkscrew-Big Cypress nesting group, not that of the Everglades, was historically the most numerically important population segment. The historic nesting location for southernmost Wood Storks was not inland in the Everglades but on Cape Sable, which has been subject to the effects of drainage canals. The population size of several decades ago is irrelevant to current conservation strategy because the southern Florida marshes have been irrevocably altered reducing their ability to support storks. We can document a population decrease of 75% from 1967 to 1981-82 in southern Florida, a time frame coincident with the operation of water management policies in the Everglades. Wood Storks recently have begun abandoning traditional colony sites in Everglades National Park in favor of sites in shallow reservoirs to the north. Drainage of the Big Cypress Swamp and maintenance of seasonally excessive water levels in the Everglades of Everglades National Park account for the storks’ repeated nesting failure and population decrease.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Reproductive Success of Wood Storks (Mycteria Americana) in East-Central Georgia
    The Auk 112(1):237-243, 1995 FACTORS AFFECTING REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF WOOD STORKS (MYCTERIA AMERICANA) IN EAST-CENTRAL GEORGIA MALCOLM C. COULTER• AND A. LAWRENCEBRYAN, JR. SavannahRiver Ecology Laboratory, Drawer E, Aiken,South Carolina 29802, USA ABS?R•cr.--From1984 through 1989, we examinedthe reproductivesuccess of WoodStorks (Mycteriaamericana) at the Birdsvillecolony in east-centralGeorgia. Average fledging success rangedamong years from 0.33to 2.16fledglings per nest.For neststhat producedfledglings, prey availabilitywas an importantfactor affecting reproductive success. Yearly averageprey densitiesat foragingsites were significantlycorrelated with the averagenumber of fledglings producedfrom successfulnests. Among 243 nestsobserved, all eggsor chickswere lostfrom 104(43%) nests. Five factorswere associatedwith the lossof entire clutchesor broods.During the two driest years, 1985 and 1988, raccoon(Procyon lotor) predation eliminated almost all chicks.Many nestswere abandonedearly in 1989, following periodsof cold weather when the parentsappeared to be under stress.In 1985, the birds desertedthe colony before egg laying when the area experiencedfreezing weather. Following nest abandonmentswithin the colony,paired adultsthat presumablyhad abandonedtheir nestswere involved in nest takeoversthat alsocaused the lossof eggsand chicks.Three stormsduring the studycaused the lossof a few nests.Some losses were due to unknown factors.The importanceof these mortality factorsvaried from year to year. Nest abandonmentsand subsequentaggression seemto be related to cold periodsearly in the season.Raccoon predation seems to be related to drying out of the water under the colony.This suggeststhat the storkshave a window in time when it is bestto breed--afterthe winter and earlyspring cold weather and beforethe water dries under the colony in the summer.Received 4 December1991, accepted 15 November 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand R I R Lmplemen'rationof Aaicl¢6 of Theconvcntio Lon Biologicaldiversity
    r_ BiodiversityConservation in Thailand r i r lmplemen'rationof Aaicl¢6 of theConvcntio_lon BiologicalDiversity Muw_ny of _e_cl reCUr _ eNW_WM#_ I Chapter 1 Biodiversity and Status 1 Species Diversity 1 Genetic Diversity 10 [cosystem Diversity 13 Chapter 2 Activities Prior to the Enactment of the National Strategy on Blodiversity 22 Chapter 3 National Strategy for Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity 26 Chapter 4 Coordinating Mechanisms for the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity $5 Chapter 5 International Cooperation and Collaboration 61 Chapter 6 Capacity for an Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity 70 Annex I National Policies, Measures and Plans on the Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Biodiversity 1998-2002 80 Annex H Drafted Regulation on the Accress and Transfer of Biological Resources 109 Annex IH Guideline on Biodiversity Data Management (BDM) 114 Annex IV Biodiversity Data Management Action Plan 130 Literature 140 ii Biodiversity Conservation in Thailand: A National Report Preface Regular review of state of biodiversity and its conservation has been recognized by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) as a crucial element in combatting loss of biodiversity. Under Article 6, the Convention's Contracting Parties are obligated to report on implementation of provisions of the Convention including measures formulated and enforced. These reports serve as valuable basic information for operation of the Convention as well as for enhancing cooperation and assistance of the Contracting Parties in achieving conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Although Thailand has not yet ratified the Convention, the country has effectively used its provisions as guiding principles for biodiversity conservation and management since the signing of the Convention in 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Wood Stork Population Trends in the United States
    Wilson’ Bull., 91(4), 1979, pp. 512-523 RECENT WOOD STORK POPULATION TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES JOHN C. OGDEN AND STEPHEN A. NESBITT The population of Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) resident in the United States occurs on the coastal plain of the Gulf of Mexico and the southern Atlantic states. Historically, storks nested in all coastal states from Texas to South Carolina (Bent 1926, Cone and Hall 1970, Dusi and Dusi 1968, Howell 1932, Oberholser 1938, Oberholser and Kincaid 1974, Wayne 1910), although colonies outside Florida formed irregularly and contained few birds. The United States population of storks was not greatly disturbed during the plume-hunting era (Allen 1958), and probably con- tained between 75,000 and 100,000 birds of all age classes during the early twentieth century (Ogden 1978). I ncreased land development and the as- sociated drainage of freshwater wetlands eliminated many nesting and feeding sites, resulting in a severe decline in the total number of storks. Concern for the fate of this species in the United States was first expressed during the late 1950s (Allen 1958, Sprunt and Kahl 1960). A series of aerial surveys was conducted between 1957 and 1960, in an attempt to locate all remaining Wood Stork nesting colonies in the United States. Renewed concern for the status of storks during the early 1970s resulted in a second series of aerial surveys beginning in 1974. These 2 surveys produced the first complete counts of the number of storks nesting in the United States, and revealed that major colonies continued to decline between surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Painted Storks Mycteria Leucocephala Breeding in Kumarakom Bird Sanctuary, Kerala Shibi Moses
    126 Indian BIRDS VOL. 10 NO. 5 (PUBL. 2 NOVEMBER 2015) Painted Storks Mycteria leucocephala breeding in Kumarakom Bird Sanctuary, Kerala Shibi Moses Moses, S., 2015. Painted Storks Mycteria leucocephala breeding in Kumarakom Bird Sanctuary, Kerala. Indian BIRDS 10 (5): 126–127. Shibi Moses, Chackalayil, Kumaranparambil House, Puthuppally PO, Kottayam 686011, Kerala, India. E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received on 26 August 2014. he Kumarakom Bird Sanctuary (9.62ºN, 76.42ºE) is located and bushy shrubs. The trees were inaccessible either by land or on the banks of the Vembanad Lake, in Kerala. It is 14 km by boat. A watchtower, about 120 m away and 8 m high, was Twest of Kottayam town, the headquarters of the eponymous the only vantage point that could be used for these observations. district. It has Vembanad Lake on its west, the Kumarakom– The branches chosen for the nest sites were bare, despite new Vechoor road on its east, the Kavanar River on the north, and leafy offshoots, and this provided some visibility even from this the KTDC Waterscapes Hotel on the south as its borders. It is distance. Since this opportunity was unique, I decide to monitor a regular nesting and roosting site for eleven species of water the nests on an irregular basis without being stationed at the nest birds like the Great Egret Casmerodius albus, Intermediate site throughout the day. Kumarakom being a mixed heronry, the Egret Mesophoyx intermedia, Little Egret Egretta garzetta, Great birds were tolerant to minor disturbances by visitors and did not Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo, Indian Cormorant P.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Ibis (Threskiornis Aethiopicus)1
    Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. WEC267 Florida's Introduced Birds: Sacred Ibis (Threskiornis aethiopicus)1 Steve Johnson and Monica McGarrity2 Many non-native birds have been introduced in prey. Sacred Ibises are larger than Florida's native Florida—perhaps as many as 200 species! Of these, ibises. Adults are approximately 30 inches long (75 at least 16 introduced species are considered cm) with a wingspan of 44–49 inches (112–124 established, according to various authorities, and cm) and weigh about 3 pounds (1.4 kg). Sacred Ibises some are now considered invasive and could have (Fig. 1) have mostly white bodies and wings; the serious impacts in Florida. This fact sheet introduces trailing edges of their wings (tips of the feathers) are the Sacred Ibis, and is one of a series of fact sheets gray-black. They have very distinctive long, black about Florida's established non-native birds and their feathers or plumes on their rumps (Fig. 1). During the impacts on our native ecosystems, economy, and the breeding season the feathers on the sides of their quality of life of Floridians. For more information on chests and on the outer wings (near the edge when Florida's introduced birds, how they got here, and the folded) may have a yellowish (or reddish) tinge, and problems they cause, read "Florida's Introduced their lower legs may be tinged with reddish-copper; Birds: An Overview" bare patches of scarlet-red skin may also be visible (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/UW297) and the other fact under their wings.
    [Show full text]