DOCSLIB.ORG

Guideline on Network Security Testing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Archived NIST Technical Series Publication The attached publication has been archived (withdrawn), and is provided solely for historical purposes. It may have been superseded by another publication (indicated below). Archived Publication Series/Number: NIST Special Publication 800-42 Title: Guideline on Network Security Testing Publication Date(s): October 2003 Withdrawal Date: September 2008 Withdrawal Note: SP 800-42 is superseded in its entirety by the publication of SP 800-115 (September 2008). Superseding Publication(s) The attached publication has been superseded by the following publication(s): Series/Number: NIST Special Publication 800-115 Title: Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment Author(s): Karen Scarfone, Murugiah Souppaya, Amanda Cody, Angela Orebaugh Publication Date(s): September 2008 URL/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-115 Additional Information (if applicable) Contact: Computer Security Division (Information Technology Lab) Latest revision of the SP 800-115 (as of June 19, 2015) attached publication: Related information: http://csrc.nist.gov/ Withdrawal N/A announcement (link): Date updated: June Ϯϯ, 2015 Guideline on Network Security NIST Special Publication 800-42 Testing Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology John Wack, Miles Tracy, Murugiah Souppaya C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 October 2003 U.S. Department of Commerce Donald L. Evans, Secretary Technology Administration Phillip J. Bond, Under Secretary for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology Arden L. Bement, Jr., Director SP 800-42 GUIDELINE ON NETWORK SECURITY TESTING Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the Nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems. This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security, and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-42 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 80 0-42, XX pages (October, 2003) CODEN: XXXX X Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experime ntal procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 2001 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov — Phone: (202) 512-1800 — Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ii SP 800-42 GUIDELINE ON NETWORK SECURITY TESTING Authority The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have developed this document in furtherance of its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) of 2002, Public Law 107-347. NIST is responsible for developing standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements, for providing adequate information security for all agency operations and assets, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems. This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, Section 8b(3), Securing Agency Information Systems, as analyzed in A-130, Appendix IV: Analysis of Key Sections. Supplemental information is provided A-130, Appendix III. This guideline has been prepared for use by federal agencies. It may be used by nongovernmental organizations on a voluntary basis and is not subject to copyright though attribution is desired by NIST. Nothing in this document should be taken to contradict standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority. Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering or superseding the existing authorities of the Secretary of Commerce, Director of the OMB, or any other federal official. Acknowledgements The authors, John Wack and Murugiah Souppaya of NIST and Miles Tracy of Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), wish to acknowledge staff at NIST and BAH who reviewed drafts of this publication and made substantial improvements to its quality, including Timothy Grance, Wayne Jansen, Tom Karygiannis, Peter Mell, Robert Sorensen, and Marianne Swanson. iii SP 800-42 GUIDELINE ON NETWORK SECURITY TESTING iv SP 800-42 GUIDELINE ON NETWORK SECURITY TESTING Table Of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose and Scope........................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Definitions ......................................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Audience ........................................................................................................................1-3 1.4 Document Organization .................................................................................................1-3 2. Security Testing and the System Development Life Cycle ..........................................2-1 2.1 System Development Life Cycle ....................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Implementation Stage ....................................................................................................2-2 2.1.2 Operational Stage ..........................................................................................................2-3 2.2 Documenting Security Testing Results ..........................................................................2-3 2.3 Roles and Responsibilities .............................................................................................2-4 2.3.1 Senior IT Management/Chief Information Officer (CIO).................................................2-4 2.3.2 Information Systems Security Program Managers (ISSM).............................................2-4 2.3.3 Information Systems Security Officers (ISSO) ...............................................................2-5 2.3.4 System and Network Administrators ..............................................................................2-5 2.3.5 Managers and Owners...................................................................................................2-5 3. Security Testing Techniques ..........................................................................................3-1 3.1 Roles and Responsibilities for Testing ...........................................................................3-1 3.2 Network Scanning ..........................................................................................................3-2 3.3 Vulnerability Scanning....................................................................................................3-3 3.4 Password Cracking ........................................................................................................3-6 3.5 Log Reviews...................................................................................................................3-7 3.6 File Integrity Checkers ...................................................................................................3-8 3.7 Virus Detectors...............................................................................................................3-9 3.8 War Dialing...................................................................................................................3-10 3.9 Wireless LAN Testing (“War Driving”) ..........................................................................3-10 3.10 Penetration Testing ......................................................................................................3-11 3.11 Post-Testing Actions ....................................................................................................3-16 3.12 General Information Security Principles.......................................................................3-17 3.13 Summary Comparisons of Network testing Techniques ..............................................3-19 4. Deployment Strategies for Security Testing .................................................................4-1 v SP 800-42 GUIDELINE ON NETWORK SECURITY TESTING 4.1 Determine the Security Category of the Information System .........................................4-1 4.2 Determine Cost of Performing Each Test Type per System ..........................................4-2 4.3 Identify Benefits of Each Test Type per System ............................................................4-2
Recommended publications
  • Servicenow Vulnerability Response

    Servicenow Vulnerability Response

    ServiceNow Vulnerability Response Connect security and IT The vulnerability challenge Coordinate response across teams for smoother task Critical vulnerabilities often hide under the radar of security challenges today. When exploited, lack of effective vulnerability response carries major impact to handoffs between groups and business reputation and data security. A study conducted by ServiceNow and quicker resolution. Get the Ponemon Institute found that over a third of organizations who suffered a accountability across the breach already knew they were vulnerable. In many cases, there was an existing organization and know work is patch for the vulnerability which was not applied due to reliance on manual getting done with remediation processes, siloed information, and lack of visibility.1 targets. Additionally, breaches are becoming more severe. Methods to exploit Drive faster, more efficient vulnerabilities are growing more sophisticated, with cybercriminals increasingly leveraging machine learning and artificial intelligence to thwart traditional security response vulnerability response mechanisms. Having a solution which interlocks all components —security, risk, and IT— is crucial to organizations staying ahead of Reduce the amount of time these tactics and taking a holistic approach to vulnerability response. spent on basic tasks with orchestration tools. Automatically prioritize and The ServiceNow solution respond to vulnerabilities with workflows and automation. ServiceNow® Vulnerability Response helps organizations respond faster and more efficiently to vulnerabilities, connect security and IT teams, and provide real-time Know your security posture visibility. It connects the workflow and automation capabilities of the Now Platform® with vulnerability scan data from leading vendors to give your teams a View your current vulnerability single platform for response that can be shared between security and IT.
  • Designing Vulnerability Testing Tools for Web Services: Approach, Components, and Tools

    Designing Vulnerability Testing Tools for Web Services: Approach, Components, and Tools

    Int. J. Inf. Secur. DOI 10.1007/s10207-016-0334-0 REGULAR CONTRIBUTION Designing vulnerability testing tools for web services: approach, components, and tools Nuno Antunes1 · Marco Vieira1 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract This paper proposes a generic approach for infrastructure, which typically includes an application server, designing vulnerability testing tools for web services, which the operating system, and a set of external systems (e.g. other includes the definition of the testing procedure and the tool services, databases, and payment gateways). Web services components. Based on the proposed approach, we present are one of the cornerstones of service-oriented architecture the design of three innovative testing tools that implement (SOA), making them the lingua franca for systems integra- three complementary techniques (improved penetration test- tion. ing, attack signatures and interface monitoring, and runtime The security of web applications is, in general, quite anomaly detection) for detecting injection vulnerabilities, poor [2,3]. Web services are no exception, and research thus offering an extensive support for different scenarios. A and practice show that web services are often deployed case study has been designed to demonstrate the tools for the with software bugs (i.e. vulnerabilities) that can be mali- particular case of SQL Injection vulnerabilities. The experi- ciously exploited [4]. Injection vulnerabilities, consisting of mental evaluation demonstrates that the tools can effectively improper code that allows the attacker to inject and execute be used in different scenarios and that they outperform commands, enabling, for instance, access to critical data, are well-known commercial tools by achieving higher detection particularly frequent [2].
  • Flextivity Getting Started Guide

    Flextivity Getting Started Guide

    Getting Started Guide Before you set up your account, you may want to spend a few minutes thinking about what you want to get out of Flextivity. Of course, Flextivity helps you successfully manage basic security such as Anti-Malware protection and a powerful Network Firewall across the computers in your organization. However, Flextivity goes beyond this. We have included a few tools to help you get the most out of your deployment. Acceptable Use Policies Most employees really want to do a good job and be productive. Nonetheless, personal Internet use has been found to be one of the number one time wasters at work. Experiments have shown that people who are able to successfully resist the temptation to surf at work make more mistakes than they would if there were no temptation[1]. It’s harder for them to learn new skills, too. The practical implication of this is that employers shouldn’t have rules against surfing and then leave access to the web wide open. Instead, it’s best to allow internet access only when it is appropriate. Intego Flextivity gives you the flexibility to manage your acceptable use policy the way that works for you. Do you want to limit use on your office wifi, but let employees surf as they please when they take laptops home? With Flextivity, you can do that. Do you want to put reasonable limits on social media surfing in the office – say, 30 minutes over the course of a day? You can do that too. Intego Flextivity helps you balance trust and team morale while putting common sense checks in place.
  • Os X Block Application from Internet Access

    Os X Block Application from Internet Access

    Os X Block Application From Internet Access ionopause!Photographic Cupolated Rickard fibDru some grumbled guacharos sanctimoniously. and microfilm his determent so promisingly! Overviolent and malfunctioning Pasquale never balloted his Then, using Vallum, you can set bandwidth limits for each process, independently. IE by calling this without checking the console exists first. We have strong opinions about controlling where kids use their tech. Murus makes use of anchors to separate inbound and outbound filtering rules from options rules, redirection, translation and dummynet rules. Safari says that it cannot locate the website host; it does not say I am not connected to the Internet. Managed Services views, and assigning groups to such services. Do you see anything new you could remove so you can try again? Pearson may use third party web trend analytical services, including Google Analytics, to collect visitor information, such as IP addresses, browser types, referring pages, pages visited and time spent on a particular site. An inclusive firewall does the reverse. As a quick update it seems that is you are not using an account with admin privileges, you may need supply admin credentials for the first time you download an app to install it, which may solve some of the problem. OS X Server offers options for managing this, but you can also do the same in the client version of the OS. Talk with your children so they know what is acceptable, who they are allowed to text, sites they should stay away from, for example. Then everything else is blocked. Dropbox syncing newly changed files, and so on.
  • Usability and Security of Personal Firewalls

    Usability and Security of Personal Firewalls

    Usability and Security of Personal Firewalls Almut Herzog^ and Nahid Shahmehri^ Dept. of Computer and Information Science, Linkopings universitet,Sweden {almhe, nahsh}@ida.liu.se Abstract. Effective security of a personal firewall depends on (1) the rule granularity and the implementation of the rule enforcement and (2) the correctness and granularity of user decisions at the time of an alert. A misconfigured or loosely configured firewall may be more dangerous than no firewall at all because of the user's false sense of security. This study assesses effective security of 13 personal firewalls by comparing possible granularity of rules as well as the usability of rule set-up and its influence on security. In order to evaluate usability, we have submitted each firewall to use cases that require user decisions and cause rule creation. In order to evaluate the firewalls' security, we analysed the created rules. In ad­ dition, we ran a port scan and replaced a legitimate, network-enabled application with another program to etssess the firewalls' behaviour in misuse cases. We have conducted a cognitive walkthrough paying special attention to user guidance and user decision support. We conclude that a stronger emphasis on user guidance, on conveying the design of the personal firewall application, on the principle of least privilege and on implications of default settings would greatly enhance both usability and security of personal firewalls. 1 Introduction In times where roaming users connect their laptops to a variety of public, pri­ vate and corporate wireless or wired networks and in times where more and more computers are always online, host-based firewalls implemented in soft­ ware, called personal firewalls, have become an important part of the security armour of a personal computer.
  • Opentext Product Security Assurance Program

    Opentext Product Security Assurance Program

    The Information Company ™ Product Security Assurance Program Contents Objective 03 Scope 03 Sources 03 Introduction 03 Concept and design 04 Development 05 Testing and quality assurance 07 Maintain and support 09 Partnership and responsibility 10 Privavy and Security Policy 11 Product Security Assurance Program 2/11 Objective The goals of the OpenText Product Security Assurance Program (PSAP) are to help ensure that all products, solutions, and services are designed, developed, and maintained with security in mind, and to provide OpenText customers with the assurance that their important assets and information are protected at all times. This document provides a general, public overview of the key aspects and components of the PSAP program. Scope The scope of the PSAP includes all software solutions designed and developed by OpenText and its subsidiaries. All OpenText employees are responsible to uphold and participate in this program. Sources The source of this overview document is the PSAP Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). This SOP is highly confidential in nature, for internal OpenText consumption only. This overview document represents the aspects that are able to be shared with OpenText customers and partners. Introduction OpenText is committed to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of its customer information. OpenText believes that the foundation of a highly secure system is that the security is built in to the software from the initial stages of its concept, design, development, deployment, and beyond. In this respect,
  • EC-Council Network Security Administrator (Exam 312-38)

    EC-Council Network Security Administrator (Exam 312-38)

    Product Information Sheet Exam 312-38 EC-Council Network Security Administrator (Exam 312-38) Page | 1 ENSAv4 Copyright © by EC-Council All Rights Reserved. Reproduction is Strictly Prohibited. Product Information Sheet Exam 312-38 EC-Council NSA is CNSS 4011 Certified The Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS)/National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States of America certified EC-Council’s Network Security Administrator (ENSA) course as having met 100% of the requirements as set out by the Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) National Standards 4011. This certification is managed by the Information Assurance Courseware Evaluation (IACE) Program, National INFOSEC (Information Security) Education and Training Program and is administered by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA). The Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) and National Security Agency (NSA) has developed a nationally recognized certification program based on NSTISSI standards. The CNSS/NSA Certification is a government class certification that is recognized as the National Training Standard for Information Security Professionals Students who have obtained these certifications would have demonstrated a solid grasp of the principles as outlined in the 4011 standard. With this, EC-Council has joined the ranks of the organizations United States Air Force Academy, United States Military Academy, Air Force Institute of Technology and Carnegie Mellon University; all of whom have attained the National Training Standard for Information Security Professionals - the CNSS 4011. Introduction The EC-Council's Network Security Administrator certification looks at the network security in defensive view while the CEH certification program looks at the security in offensive mode. The ENSA program is designed to provide fundamental skills needed to analyze the internal and external security threats against a network, and to develop security policies that will protect an organization’s information.
  • Tenable and Ahnlab Leveraging Network Intelligence to Stop Malware Cold

    Tenable and Ahnlab Leveraging Network Intelligence to Stop Malware Cold

    Tenable and AhnLab Leveraging Network Intelligence to Stop Malware Cold Key Challenges The breaching of organizations large and small occurs all too frequently, damaging the confidentiality, availability and integrity of the critical data assets that organizations rely on. Also at risk is hard-earned reputation. Most organizations focus on the perimeter of their networks, and neglect the intranet – ignoring threats that circumvent the based defenses and inject themselves directly into the core of the infrastructure. Additionally, most organizations are unprepared to deal with advanced malware threats that go undetected by traditional anti-malware technologies. Finally, the complex nature of today’s software results in vulnerabilities that appear at an alarming rate, increasing the threat surface that attackers can leverage. A solution is required that: • Addresses the network universally rather than just at the edge • Can deal with advanced malware threats using non-traditional analysis methods • Can detect and help to manage vulnerabilities that exist within the entire infrastructure on Solution Components all device types Tenable Network Security has teamed up with AhnLab to deliver just such a solution. • Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View • Tenable Nessus Vulnerability Scanner Solution Overview The solution combines Tenable’s SecurityCenter Continuous View (SCCV) solution with AhnLab • Tenable Passive Vulnerability Scanner Malware Defense System (MDS) to provide a system that actively blocks malware bearing • Tenable Log Correlation Engine content, malicious traffic, and outbound C&C traffic. This is done within the AhnLab MDS at the network edge, using a hybrid behavior and signature based approach. • AhnLab Malware Defense System Within the intranet, Tenable’s Passive Vulnerability Scanner (PVS) monitors network segments to Key Benefits detect vulnerabilities, C&C traffic, policy violations, and signs of malicious activities.
  • Personal Firewalls Are a Necessity for Solo Users

    Personal Firewalls Are a Necessity for Solo Users

    Personal firewalls are a necessity for solo users COMPANY PRODUCT PLATFORM NOTES PRICE Aladdin Knowledge Systems Ltd. SeSafe Desktop Windows Combines antivirus with content filtering, blocking and $72 Arlington Heights, Ill. monitoring 847-808-0300 www.ealaddin.com Agnitum Inc. Outpost Firewall Pro Windows Blocks ads, sites, programs; limits access by specific times $40 Nicosia, Cyprus www.agnitum.com Computer Associates International Inc. eTrust EZ Firewall Windows Basic firewall available only by download $40/year Islandia, N.Y. 631-342-6000 my-etrust.com Deerfield Canada VisNetic Firewall Windows Stateful, packet-level firewall for workstations, mobile $101 (Canadian) St. Thomas, Ontario for Workstations users or telecommuters 519-633-3403 www.deerfieldcanada.ca Glucose Development Corp. Impasse Mac OS X Full-featured firewall with real-time logging display $10 Sunnyvale, Calif. www.glu.com Intego Corp. NetBarrier Personal Firewall Windows Full-featured firewall with cookie and ad blocking $50 Miami 512-637-0700 NetBarrier 10.1 Mac OS X Full-featured firewall $60 www.intego.com NetBarrier 2.1 Mac OS 8 and 9 Full-featured firewall $60 Internet Security Systems Inc. BlackIce Windows Consumer-oriented PC firewall $30 Atlanta 404-236-2600 RealSecure Desktop Windows Enterprise-grade firewall system for remote, mobile and wireless users Varies blackice.iss.net/ Kerio Technologies Inc. Kerio Personal Firewall Windows Bidirectional, stateful firewall with encrypted remote-management option $39 Santa Clara, Calif. 408-496-4500 www.kerio.com Lava Software Pty. Ltd. AdWare Plus Windows Antispyware blocks some advertiser monitoring but isn't $27 Falköping, Sweden intended to block surveillance utilities 46-0-515-530-14 www.lavasoft.de Network Associates Inc.
  • TV Superscan 2 Enhanced Users Guide

    TV Superscan 2 Enhanced Users Guide

    TV Superscan 2 Enhanced Users Guide To Reset the TV SuperScan Unit: 1. Unplug Power from Unit 2. Press & Hold “Select” and “Zoom” buttons at the same time. 3. While holding buttons, plug in power. When red lights on, release the two buttons. 4. If you get some output on the screen press the “Zoom” button once more to complete the reset procedure. © 1998 ADS Technologies. All Rights Reserved First Edition: Revision 1.0 April, 1998 Microsoft, MS-DOS, Windows, and Windows 95 and Windows 98 are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. IBM is a registered trade- mark of International Business Machines, Inc. ADS is a registered trademark of ADS Technologies Inc. ADS Technologies (ADS) makes no warranty of any kind with regard to this material, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of mer- chantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The information furnished within this written document is for information purposes only and is sub- ject to change without notice. ADS Technologies assumes no responsi- bility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear herein. ADS makes no commitment to update or to keep current information contained within this document. Table of Contents A Letter from the President of ADS . 6 Introduction . 7 System Requirements . 7 Package Contents . 8 Chapter 1 Installation Guide . 9 Installing the Hardware . 11 Connecting to a Desktop Computer . 11 Connecting to a Laptop Computer . 14 Connection Diagrams. 16 Desktop Connection Diagram . 16 Laptop Connection Diagram . 16 Chapter 2 TV Superscan 2 Enhanced . 17 Overview . 19 Menu/Enter Button . 19 Select .
  • Kali Linux Penetration Testing Bible

    Kali Linux Penetration Testing Bible

    Telegram Channel : @IRFaraExam Table of Contents Cover Title Page Introduction What Does This Book Cover? Companion Download Files How to Contact the Publisher How to Contact the Author CHAPTER 1: Mastering the Terminal Window Kali Linux File System Managing Users and Groups in Kali Files and Folders Management in Kali Linux Remote Connections in Kali Kali Linux System Management Networking in Kali Linux Summary CHAPTER 2: Bash Scripting Basic Bash Scripting Printing to the Screen in Bash Variables Script Parameters User Input Functions Conditions and Loops Summary CHAPTER 3: Network Hosts Scanning Basics of Networking Network Scanning DNS Enumeration Telegram Channel : @IRFaraExam Summary CHAPTER 4: Internet Information Gathering Passive Footprinting and Reconnaissance Summary CHAPTER 5: Social Engineering Attacks Spear Phishing Attacks Payloads and Listeners Social Engineering with the USB Rubber Ducky Summary CHAPTER 6: Advanced Enumeration Phase Transfer Protocols E‐mail Protocols Database Protocols CI/CD Protocols Web Protocols 80/443 Graphical Remoting Protocols File Sharing Protocols Summary CHAPTER 7: Exploitation Phase Vulnerabilities Assessment Services Exploitation Summary CHAPTER 8: Web Application Vulnerabilities Web Application Vulnerabilities Summary CHAPTER 9: Web Penetration Testing and Secure Software Development Lifecycle Web Enumeration and Exploitation Secure Software Development Lifecycle Summary CHAPTER 10: Linux Privilege Escalation Telegram Channel : @IRFaraExam Introduction to Kernel Exploits and Missing Configurations
  • Recent Results in Network Mapping: Implications on Cybersecurity

    Recent Results in Network Mapping: Implications on Cybersecurity

    Recent Results in Network Mapping: Implications on Cybersecurity Robert Beverly, Justin Rohrer, Geoffrey Xie Naval Postgraduate School Center for Measurement and Analysis of Network Data (CMAND) July 27, 2015 DHS S&T Cyber Seminar R. Beverly, J. Rohrer, G. Xie (NPS) Advances in Network Mapping DHS S&T Cyber Seminar 1 / 50 Intro Outline 1 Intro 2 Background 3 Project 4 Recent Advances 5 Future R. Beverly, J. Rohrer, G. Xie (NPS) Advances in Network Mapping DHS S&T Cyber Seminar 2 / 50 Intro CMAND Lab CMAND Lab @ NPS Naval Postgraduate School Navy’s Research University Located in Monterey, CA '1500 students, military officers, foreign military, DoD civilians Center for Measurement and Analysis of Network Data 3 NPS professors, 2 NPS staff 1 PhD student, rotating cast of ∼ 5-8 Master’s students Collaborators: CAIDA, ICSI, MIT, Akamai, Cisco, Verisign, ::: Focus: Large-scale network measurement and data mining Network architecture and security R. Beverly, J. Rohrer, G. Xie (NPS) Advances in Network Mapping DHS S&T Cyber Seminar 3 / 50 Intro Output Select Recent Publications (bold DHS-supported): 1 Luckie, Beverly, Wu, Allman, Claffy, “Resilience of Deployed TCP to Blind Off-Path Attacks,” in ACM IMC 2015 2 Huz, Bauer, Claffy, Beverly, “Experience in using Mechanical Turk for Network Measurement,” in ACM C2BID 2015 3 Beverly, Luckie, Mosley, Claffy, “Measuring and Characterizing IPv6 Router Availability,” in PAM 2015 4 Beverly, Berger, “Server Siblings: Identifying Shared IPv4/IPv6 Infrastructure,” in PAM 2015 5 Alt, Beverly, Dainotti, “Uncovering Network Tarpits with Degreaser,” in ACSAC 2014 6 Craven, Beverly, Allman, “A Middlebox-Cooperative TCP for a non End-to-End Internet,” in ACM SIGCOMM 2014 7 Baltra, Beverly, Xie, “Ingress Point Spreading: A New Primitive for Adaptive Active Network Mapping,” in PAM 2014 R.