DOCSLIB.ORG

B~Ovine in the Tower

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
B~Ovine in the Tower REV lt,ATHEh HAUrtUS TH}:; ABBEY .t>RE88 TH• SAINT HE INRAIJ nm CATHOLIC Sub•cr1pt1on: . Vol. XXIV No. 9 April, 1958 25o Per Yeu Price le EASY ESSAY By PETER ~UR.IN By DOROTHY DAY Caesar or God A story has been sent out by Christ says : the N. C. W. C. news service about "Render to Caesar "the closing" of the House of Hosp­ the things that are Caesar's itality in New York by the city. I and to God understand that the story included the things thljt are yo?'s." 1 the statement that we were ·looking The Fascist Caesar, • for another place, but this state­ the Nazi Caesar, ment was left out· of many of the and the Bolshevik Cae~ar news stories in the diocesan press, are not satisfied and our friends have been left with the things with the impression that the House that are Caesar's; is closing. This is not true. We are they also want the things hunting daily for a new place and that are God's. we will· continue even if we have When Caesar sets a glaim to rent a· store front to feed the to the things that are God's hungry, clothe the naked. When it he sets himself up as dod. comes to sheltering the harborless, And when Caesar with all the deaths by fire in our sets himself up as a God great and crowded cities, it be­ he sets himself U.P , comes harder to find a place where as a faker. we would get a certificate of occu· • When Caesar sets himself up · pancy from the city. ~ as a faker, African Bishops We repeat as we have many he should be denounced B ~ovine In The Tower times before, that while there are as a faker. Denounce Segregation slums, we must live in them, to By JIM MILORD share the condition of the poor. At Fascist Caesar , LUSAKA, Northern Rhodesia­ • The Fascist Caesar Most of the, working population, traffic problem for a hundred miles the same time we have improved In a recent pastoral letter the claims that the child blessed by automation or not would or, a wreck. In either case, your every house we lived in, and made belongs to the state. Catholic · bishops of this British probably raise a hue and cry plione plant becomes -janglingly it a place of comfort and peace. The child does no~ belong protectorate made the following against George Orwell · and his alive with waspish dispatchers One story printed about us said to the state; statemep.ts: "Some barriers may coterie of gloom-prophets. droning their everlasting: Move, that we had been living in a fire Move, Move. trap, and that the city had to clamp it belongs to the paren,ts. have been justified in · the past. Things are a bit mechanical but The child was given by God not that bad-ever. 1984! You A towerman moves his trains by down on us. The truth of the mat· to the parents; They are no tonger j,ustified today. don't really believe that stuff? a series of interlocking switches ter is that when I was given a sus· / pended sentence as a sluin land­ he was not given by God Nothing short of this concept of I cannot say ttiat I do. But I am and ·signals and the hallmark of lord (a sentence that still stands) , to the State. a multiracial society will have the beginning to wonder. And if you'll his eff~ciency is a continuous ftow: the house had two fire escapes, The parents must approval of the Catholic Church, follow me on my final Railroad ot traffic. It is impossible, of teach the child course, as machinery in :the plant back and front, though the build· because it is the only system which -caper, 'ou ,P..e.rhaps .P,aY ]\a\;e cause ing at Chrystie street is onfy h\ o to serve God to look into our Brave Old World itself as welf ' as switch springs rooms deep. In our repairs, the from whom will· safeguard the requirements of with less myopia. break down, signals bum out and they received the child. human dignity and secure equality trouble is a daily affair somewhere building- department made us take "Once the wheels start rollin,' " one fire escape aown! We also had When the parents in human r~hts for all its citizens. on the Pike. · a crusty Brakeman told me once, a night watchman and fire ex· allow the state In labor· jargon, l suppose the There Is no multiracial society as "you'll be hearin' them all the time tinguishers on each ftoor. to grab the c~ild long as the various sections or the and you won't be the same." "conditions" were ideal: good pay and to act When we purchased the building I had to admit he was right. Here -$2.00 an hour even while train­ towa d the child population are compelled to live with the help of St. Joseph e"ght I was in the Summer of 1,954 .right ing, three weeks vaca'tion with pay, as if God did not matter, segregated from each other. One hot plate privileges, private wash­ years ago, there were no violations bfCk in the re!f clapboarded hiring against the house. In the' ensuing they loose their claim of the fundamental doctrines of the office of the Belt Railway, room and even janitor services. to the allegiance six years, more and more laws were Church is that the human race is ·A subtle lure·, Railroading. It is There was no slogging around in a of the child. slicker' on rainy nights, no tripping added to the books, so that there one. We appeal to all Catholics to a narcotic after a few hundred in the snow. You could wear a <Continued on page 6) The Nazi Caesar think and speak and act in con· nights out 'there in the hustling The Nazi Caesar Yards. I was remembering the smoking jacket to work and go • claims that there are formity ~th their belief . in the thrills I got when fighting and home without a smudge on your Australi·an BIS• hops superior races unity of mankind, and not pay holding a full hea(l of steam ·at the hands. At one Tower my co-work- .. and inferior races. exaggerated attention to accidental pop as we woµld run for a grade. ers on day and night tricks rigged Urge Accel,.,rated The superior race differences within the'human fam­ I mused 'about those ea.rly dawn up a TV set in a concealed place, "" j. ls always the one ily, particularly to the color dif­ runs, sifting along on a big "glory" to watch between trains. J • · • one happens to belong to. ference. It would pe hypocricy to engine, a Pacific Mountain, with It all reads like a very pleasant mnugrat1on The inferior race claim that we stand for Christian fifty yellow reefer cars strung out job indeed. On the contrary, it The Australian Federal Catholic' is always the one civilization if we ignore one half behind and a dishwater gray plume was deadening and intolerable for Immigration Committee, an official that refuses to recognize of the most important command­ of smoke spiraling into the sky. the most part and ls sure to be- or gan of the bishops there, is urg­ the superiority of the one ment of Christ." My attempt at a farming experi­ come worse. Why? ing an accelerated immigration which claims to be In this te~se situation the bishops ment found my, ideals of freedom Electronics and TV are slowly program. In_ a recent statement the the superior race. could easily have hidden beh~d f not squaring too well with the feed putting this once ~challenging job committee said that the "prejudices The superior race false prudence and remained silent. mills and necessity as well as · my into a position for robots-certain-. and ar:-tipathies" that create opposi. likes to believe Like the hierarchy of the Union of addiction to tracks and trains ly not men-at least men who want tion to immigration are more often that God works South Africa, however, the bishops found me back in the crazy, hard­ to do more than push buttons. than n.ot the result of "a lack of through the superior race. here spoke up against the country's rock routine. In the old days, the switches had know:ed'{e and understanding of The superior race "ruinous divisions." Three he ct i c, dissillusioning to be pulled by manual work on a man's inherent right to emigrate." conceives God months they were, in a refined series of wires and pipes. · They These prejudices are often as a racial God. form of indolence which would de­ were nicknamed "Armstrongs" and linked with "selfish fears of loss of There are no superior races; Colombian Bishops light an Orwellian oracle. · it took a .strong arm on wintry employment, of power and of au­ God {s not a racial God It was my last tap with Mother nights to close the switch points. thority, social an9 religious," the but the Father of all races · Ask Land R~f orm Railroad. It also gave the man plenty of ex- committee said. "Such fears ought and the Creator of all; A dispatch~r had once taunted ercise running from one to the to be d;sregarded as unworthy of · Christ loved and died for all.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Coronation Bible a Fly-Past Over Buckingham Palace, and a Gun Salute Fired at Noon
    ISSUE No. 37, June 2006 ISSN 0840-5565 n 7 June of this year, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will officially celebrate her eightieth birthday Owith the Trooping of the Colour ceremony, The Coronation Bible a fly-past over Buckingham Palace, and a gun salute fired at noon. In this country few will probably be aware of the festivities, but many would still acknowledge the tireless efforts of this royal octogenarian on behalf of her country and the Commonwealth. In the holdings of the Fisher Library is a handsome souvenir of the Queen’s reign, the so-called “Coronation Bible,” printed at the Oxford University Press under the direction of Charles Batey in 953. Batey had worked at the Press since 929, and assumed the role of Printer to the University in 946. One of his great passions in that capacity was to preserve and make better known the ancient types that had been used at the venerable Press throughout its history. The crisp, clean font chosen for the Coronation Bible is a credit to his expertise in this field. The composition of the Bible actually began in February of 952, shortly after the death of King George VI; among its many distinguishing characteristics is the fact that the entire book was the work of a single compositor. While the vast majority of the Bibles in this edition were printed on regular paper and expressly intended for pulpit use, an additional twenty-five were printed on too bulky to be used gracefully, while the of Oxford University Press in 930.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of Anglican and Roman Catholic Bilateral Relations from a Theological Perspective
    ONE STEP FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ANGLICAN AND ROMAN CATHOLIC BILATERAL RELATIONS FROM A THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE James N. Amanze Abstract ___________________________________________________________________________ This paper is a critical examination of Anglican-Roman Catholic bilateral relations from a theological perspective. The main argument of the paper is that while the Anglican and Roman Catholic Churches consider themselves to be in a special relationship as a result of a number of theological agreements reached over the past forty years aimed at bringing them closer together than ever before, they are far from achieving visible church unity. The achievements made over the years, in the form of agreed theological texts have, from time to time, been derailed by subtle theological differences between the two church traditions. This can best be described in the words of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin “One step forward, two steps back”. The paper concludes that given the small amount of progress, which is pushed back by a large amount of setbacks, church unity is unattainable. Key words: Ecumenism, theological texts, church unity, bilateral relations, theological perspective ___________________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction Ecumenism, that is, the activities to achieve church unity after the 16th Century Protestant Reformation in Germany has been the hallmark of the church in the Twentieth and Twenty First Centuries. Philip Potter, once General Secretary of the World Council of Churches, noted that the ecumenical movement was “the means by which the churches, which form the house, the oikos of God, are seeking so live and witness before all peoples that the whole oikoumene may become the oikos of God through the crucified and risen Christ in the power of the life- giving Spirit.”70 This is in line with the views of the Decree on Ecumenism (Unitatis Redintegratio) of the Second Vatican Council, according to which “The Church established by Christ the Lord is, indeed, one and unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Time for Reflection
    All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group TIME FOR REFLECTION A REPORT OF THE ALL-PARTY PARLIAMENTARY HUMANIST GROUP ON RELIGION OR BELIEF IN THE UK PARLIAMENT The All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group acts to bring together non-religious MPs and peers to discuss matters of shared interests. More details of the group can be found at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmallparty/190508/humanist.htm. This report was written by Cordelia Tucker O’Sullivan with assistance from Richy Thompson and David Pollock, both of Humanists UK. Layout and design by Laura Reid. This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of Members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this report are those of the Group. © All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group, 2019-20. TIME FOR REFLECTION CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 INTRODUCTION 6 Recommendations 7 THE CHAPLAIN TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS 8 BISHOPS IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 10 Cost of the Lords Spiritual 12 Retired Lords Spiritual 12 Other religious leaders in the Lords 12 Influence of the bishops on the outcome of votes 13 Arguments made for retaining the Lords Spiritual 14 Arguments against retaining the Lords Spiritual 15 House of Lords reform proposals 15 PRAYERS IN PARLIAMENT 18 PARLIAMENT’S ROLE IN GOVERNING THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND 20 Parliamentary oversight of the Church Commissioners 21 ANNEX 1: FORMER LORDS SPIRITUAL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 22 ANNEX 2: THE INFLUENCE OF LORDS SPIRITUAL ON THE OUTCOME OF VOTES IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 24 Votes decided by the Lords Spiritual 24 Votes decided by current and former bishops 28 3 All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group FOREWORD The UK is more diverse than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster Abbey ASERVICE to CELEBRATE the 60TH ANNIVERSARY of the CORONATION of HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II
    Westminster Abbey ASERVICE TO CELEBRATE THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CORONATION OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II Tuesday 4th June 2013 at 11.00 am FOREWORD On 2nd June 1953, the Coronation of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II followed a pattern established over the centuries since William the Conqueror was crowned in Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day 1066. Our intention in this Service of Thanksgiving is to evoke and reflect the shape of the Coronation service itself. The Queen’s entrance was marked by the Choirs’ singing Psalm 122—I was glad—set to music for the Coronation of EdwardVII by Sir Hubert Parry. The Queen’s Scholars of Westminster School exercised their historic right to exclaim Vivat Regina Elizabetha! (‘Long live Queen Elizabeth!’); so it will be today. The coronation service begins with the Recognition. The content of this part of the service is, of course, not today what it was in 1953, but the intention is similar: to recognise with thanksgiving the dutiful service offered over the past sixty years by our gracious and noble Queen, and to continue to pray God saveThe Queen. The Anointing is an act of consecration, a setting apart for royal and priestly service, through the gift of the Holy Spirit. The Ampulla from which the oil was poured rests today on the HighAltar as a reminder of that central act. St Edward’s Crown also rests today on the High Altar as a powerful symbol of the moment of Coronation. In today’s Service, a flask of Oil is carried by representatives of the people of the United Kingdom to the Sacrarium, received by theArchbishop and placed by the Dean on the High Altar.
    [Show full text]
  • Papal-Service.Pdf
    Westminster Abbey A SERVICE OF EVENING PRAYER IN THE PRESENCE OF HIS HOLINESS POPE BENEDICT XVI AND HIS GRACE THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY Friday 17 September 2010 6.15 pm THE COLLEGIATE CHURCH OF ST PETER IN WESTMINSTER Westminster Abbey’s recorded history can be traced back well over a thousand years. Dunstan, Bishop of London, brought a community of Benedictine monks here around 960 AD and a century later King Edward established his palace nearby and extended his patronage to the neighbouring monastery. He built for it a great stone church in the Romanesque style which was consecrated on 28 December 1065. The Abbey was dedicated to St Peter, and the story that the Apostle himself consecrated the church is a tradition of eleventh-century origin. King Edward died in January 1066 and was buried in front of the new high altar. When Duke William of Normandy (William I) arrived in London after his victory at the Battle of Hastings he chose to be crowned in Westminster Abbey, on Christmas Day 1066. The Abbey has been the coronation church ever since. The Benedictine monastery flourished owing to a combination of royal patronage, extensive estates, and the presence of the shrine of St Edward the Confessor (King Edward had been canonised in 1161). Westminster’s prestige and influence among English religious houses was further enhanced in 1222 when papal judges confirmed that the monastery was exempt from English ecclesiastical jurisdiction and answerable direct to the Pope. The present Gothic church was begun by King Henry III in 1245. By October 1269 the eastern portion, including the Quire, had been completed and the remains of St Edward were translated to a new shrine east of the High Altar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religious Life for Women in Australian Anglicanism, 1892-1995
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sydney eScholarship THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN THE CHURCH : THE RELIGIOUS LIFE FOR WOMEN IN AUSTRALIAN ANGLICANISM, 1892-1995 BY GAIL ANNE BALL A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Studies in Religion University of Sydney (c) Gail Ball June 2000 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 9 CHAPTER ONE 10 The Introduction of the Religious Life into the Church of England in the Nineteenth Century CHAPTER TWO 34 The Introduction of Dedicated Work for Women in the Anglican Church in the Australian Colonies CHAPTER THREE 67 The Establishment and Diversification of the Outreach of Religious Communities in Australia: 1892-1914 CHAPTER FOUR 104 From Federation to the Second World War: A Time of Expansion and Consolidation for the Religious Life CHAPTER FIVE 135 The Established Communities from the Second World War PAGE CHAPTER SIX The Formation of New Communities 164 between 1960 and 1995 CHAPTER SEVEN 187 An Appraisal of Spirituality particularly as it relates to the Religious Community CHAPTER EIGHT 203 Vocation CHAPTER NINE 231 Rules, Government and Customs CHAPTER TEN 268 The Communities Compared CHAPTER ELEVEN 287 Outreach - An Overview CHAPTER TWELVE 306 The Future CONCLUSION 325 BIBLIOGRAPHY 334 General Section 336 Archival Section 361 APPENDIX ONE 370 Professed Sisters of the Communities in Australia, 1995 Professed Sisters of Former Communities 386 Bush Church Aid Deaconesses
    [Show full text]
  • The See of Canterbury
    The See of Canterbury STEPHEN NEILL THE ARCHDEACON OF WESTMINSTER is well known for his humane, indeed urbane, historical scholarship. I can think of no one, except perhaps Canon Charles Smyth, who could have produced so engaging a panorama of a hundred archbishops of Canterbury.* Dr. Carpenter has wisely resisted the temptation to string his arch­ bishops out on a line-to make a hundred brief biographies interesting would overtax the resources of the most skilled historian and writer. He has depicted a number of them in groups. Even so the Anglo­ Saxons remain shadowy figures, and few of the medievals are really interesting. When we come to the Reformation, it seems to me that Dr. Carpenter has not fully understood the greatness of Cranmer, has been a little too kind to Pole, a little indecisive on Laud. And I do not know how anyone could make the Georgian bishops interesting; they were on the whole a poor lot, and the best of the bishops of that time, Joseph Butler, never attained to the primacy. As we approach modern times the sketches become more individual and more alive. Dr. Carpenter is very good on Tait and Davidson, good on Benson and Lang, a little weak on the two Temples. I judge it to have been a mistake to include Geoffrey Fisher-the time has not yet come at which it will be possible to see in perspective that enigmatic figure. His remarks on the present holder of the office are thin and unrevealing. So a more than competent job. My real question, however, is whether the Archdeacon was put by his publishers on to a really rewarding enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • STORY of ANGLICANISM
    STORY of ANGLICANISM PART 1 (26th May 2018) ANCIENT & MEDIEVAL FOUNDATIONS When does Anglican history begin? The 16th century division of medieval Christendom into national and denominational jurisdictions marked the beginning of separate development in English religion. But to understand the particular shape of Anglicanism, it is helpful to know the pre-Reformation church from which it evolved. Our study of the ancient and medieval English Church will not only illumine generic topics of Christian history (eg. conversion of the barbarians, the monastic ideal the struggles of bishops and kings, etc.), but it will also reveal certain Anglican traits rooted deeply in the past of Britain’s relatively pragmatic and moderate peoples. This is perhaps a point not to be pressed too far, lest the increasingly diverse branches of the Anglican Communion begin to slight the particulars of their own local histories in favour of a romanticised pedigree of Celts, cathedrals and kings. Nevertheless, the English reformers repeatedly stressed that theirs was not a new church, but one that had its origins in earliest centuries of the faith. And while a majority of the Communion no longer confuses being Anglican with being English, we may still find considerable pleasure in claiming these stories as part of our family lore. The Church and History 1. Why do we study history? What do these stories have to do with us? What was your favourite part of the video? Why? 2. What makes you a Christian? Can you be a Christian by yourself? What are the essential components of the Christian life? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends Acquisitions 1964-2018
    Acquired with the Aid of the Friends Manuscripts 1964: Letter from John Dury (1596-1660) to the Evangelical Assembly at Frankfurt-am- Main, 6 August 1633. The letter proposes a general assembly of the evangelical churches. 1966: Two letters from Thomas Arundel, Archbishop of Canterbury, to Nicholas of Lucca, 1413. Letter from Robert Hallum, Bishop of Salisbury concerning Nicholas of Lucca, n.d. 1966: Narrative by Leonardo Frescobaldi of a pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1384. 1966: Survey of church goods in 33 parishes in the hundreds of Blofield and Walsham, Norfolk, 1549. 1966: Report of a debate in the House of Commons, 27 February 1593. From the Fairhurst Papers. 1967: Petition to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners by Miles Coverdale and others, 1565. From the Fairhurst Papers. 1967: Correspondence and papers of Christopher Wordsworth (1807-1885), Bishop of Lincoln. 1968: Letter from John Whitgift, Archbishop of Canterbury, to John Boys, 1599. 1968: Correspondence and papers of William Howley (1766-1848), Archbishop of Canterbury. 1969: Papers concerning the divorce of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon. 1970: Papers of Richard Bertie, Marian exile in Wesel, 1555-56. 1970: Notebook of the Nonjuror John Leake, 1700-35. Including testimony concerning the birth of the Old Pretender. 1971: Papers of Laurence Chaderton (1536?-1640), puritan divine. 1971: Heinrich Bullinger, History of the Reformation. Sixteenth century copy. 1971: Letter from John Davenant, Bishop of Salisbury, to a minister of his diocese [1640]. 1971: Letter from John Dury to Mr. Ball, Preacher of the Gospel, 1639. 1972: ‘The examination of Valentine Symmes and Arthur Tamlin, stationers, … the Xth of December 1589’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glorious and Salutiferous Œconomy...?
    A Glorious and Salutiferous Œconomy...? An ecclesiological enquiry into metropolitical authority and provincial polity in the Anglican Communion Alexander John Ross Emmanuel College A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Divinity Faculty University of Cambridge April 2018 This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the Faculty of Divinity Degree Committee. 2 Alexander John Ross A Glorious and Salutiferous Œconomy…? An ecclesiological enquiry into metropolitical authority and provincial polity in the Anglican Communion. Abstract For at least the past two decades, international Anglicanism has been gripped by a crisis of identity: what is to be the dynamic between autonomy and interdependence? Where is authority to be located? How might the local relate to the international? How are the variously diverse national churches to be held together ‘in communion’? These questions have prompted an explosion of interest in Anglican ecclesiology within both the church and academy, with particular emphasis exploring the nature of episcopacy, synodical government, liturgy and belief, and common principles of canon law.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Places of Confirmation of Election of Archbishops of Canterbury
    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Places of Confirmation of Election of Archbishops of Canterbury By tradition St. Mary Le Bow, where the Court of Arches sat, became the customary place for the confirmation of the election of Archbishops and Bishops. At the Restoration the tradition was not immediately revived: Juxon’s election was confirmed in the Henry VII Chapel in Westminster Abbey and Sheldon’s in Lambeth Palace (see John Evelyn’s account). But from the confirmation of Sancroft’s election in 1678 until the early 20th century, the ceremony was always held in St. Mary Le Bow. A change was made in 1903 with the confirmation of the election of Randall Davidson. To prevent protests against the opinions of the elected Bishop or Archbishop which had occurred at some previous ceremonies of confirmation at St. Mary Le Bow, the form was modified and the location was transferred to Church House, Westminster - Davidson, as Bishop of Winchester, had been one of the Commissioners for the confirmation of the election of his predecessor, Frederick Temple, and having witnessed the protest against Temple’s views had written to the Guardian calling for a review of the ceremony. The precedent set by Davidson was not followed by subsequent Archbishops. Lang reverted to St. Mary Le Bow, but from 1943 until the election of Archbishop Carey, the confirmation took place at St. Paul’s Cathedral. The change in venue in 1943 and 1945 occurred because St. Mary Le Bow was still suffering from war damage. Archbishop Carey reverted to the time- honoured custom but in December 2002 the election of Archbishop Williams was confirmed at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Unenglish and Unmanly: Anglo-Catholicism and Homosexuality
    UnEnglish and Unmanly: Anglo-Catholicism and Homosexuality By David Hilliard ESPITE THE TRADITIONAL teaching of the Christian Church that homosexual behaviour is always sinful, there are grounds for believing Dthat Anglo-Catholic religion within the Church of England has offered emotional and aesthetic satisfactions that have been particularly attractive to members of a stigmatised sexual minority. This apparent connection between Anglo-Catholicism and the male homosexual subculture in the English-speaking world has often been remarked upon, but it has never been fully explored. In 1960, for example, in a pioneering study of male homosexuality in Britain, Gordon Westwood stated: Some of the contacts maintained that the highest proportion of homosexuals who are regular churchgoers favoured the Anglo-Catholic churches. ... It was not possible to confirm that suggestion in this survey, but it is not difficult to understand that the services with impressive ceremony and large choirs are more likely to appeal to homosexuals.1 More recently, in the United States, several former priests of the Episcopal church have described some of the links between homosexual men and Catholic forms of religion, on the basis of their own knowledge of Anglo-Catholic parishes.2 This essay brings together some of the historical evidence of the ways in which a homosexual sensibility has expressed itself within Anglo-Catholicism. Because of the fragmentary and ambiguous nature of much of this evidence only a tentative outline can be suggested. I Until the late nineteenth century homosexuality was socially defined in terms of certain forbidden sexual acts, such as “buggery” or “sodomy.”3 1 Gordon Westwood, A Minority: A Report on the Life of the Male Homosexual in Great Britain (London; Longmans, 1960), pp.
    [Show full text]