CA-39 Young Kim Documents 3.23.18

Young Kim (CA-39) Research Book

The following report contains research on Young Kim, a Republican challenger in California’s 39th Congressional District. Research for this book was completed by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s Research Department in January 2018.

By accepting this report, you are accepting responsibility for all information and analysis included. Therefore, it is your responsibility to verify all claims against the original documentation before you make use of it.

Make sure you understand the facts behind our conclusions before making any specific charges against anyone.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ...... 2 Thematics ...... 4 Kim Failed To Pay Her Taxes While Taking Millions From Taxpayers .... 5 Kim’s Exaggerated Business “Experience” ...... 10 Key Visuals...... 14 Personal Finance ...... 16 Political Career ...... 26 Extreme Rhetoric ...... 32 Ethics ...... 33 Relationships ...... 36 Donald Trump ...... 39 Issues ...... 41 Agriculture ...... 42 Budget ...... 43 Civil Rights & Liberties ...... 44 Consumer Issues ...... 49 Crime & Public Safety ...... 51 Economy & Jobs ...... 52 Education Issues ...... 53 Election & Campaign Finance Issues ...... 59 Energy Issues ...... 62 Environmental Issues ...... 65 FEMA & Disaster Relief ...... 71 Gun Issues ...... 72 Health Care Issues ...... 77 Housing Issues ...... 80 Immigration & Border Issues ...... 83 Labor ...... 87 LGBT Issues ...... 90 Native American Issues ...... 94 Seniors’ Issues ...... 95 State Issues ...... 96 Tax Issues ...... 97 2 Technology Issues ...... 99 Transportation Issues ...... 100 Veterans’ Issues ...... 102 Women ...... 103

3 Thematics

4 Kim Failed To Pay Her Taxes While Taking Millions From Taxpayers

Significant Findings

 In 2015, Kim and her husband received two tax liens worth $387.55 for their failure to pay property taxes.

 In 2018, Kim listed an IRS liability worth between $10,000 and $15,000 on her federal personal financial disclosure.

 Between 2012 and 2015, Kim received an annual $7,000 homeowner exemption at an address she owned but at which she did not live.

 In 2016, Kim’s opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, challenged Kim to release her tax forms after accusing her and her husband of improperly disclosing their incomes on official forms.

 Throughout her career, Kim has taken more than $1.28 million in taxpayer-funded salaries, bonuses, and per diems.

 In 2012, Kim pocketed an additional $32,500 on top of her taxpayer-funded salary to “consult” her boss, Rep. Ed Royce, on his campaign.

 Kim will be eligible to receive $30,784.17 annually from a taxpayer-funded pension.

Kim Was Caught Repeatedly Failing To Pay Her Taxes

Kim And Her Husband Received Two Tax Liens Worth $387.35 For Their Failure To Pay Property Taxes

October 13, 2015: Young And Charles Kim Received A Lien For Their Failure To Pay $189.39 In Property Taxes. [Orange County Treasurer – Tax Collector, Document Number: 2015-000533343, filed 10/13/15]

October 13, 2015: Young And Charles Kim Received A Lien For Their Failure To Pay $197.96 In Property Taxes. [Orange County Treasurer – Tax Collector, Document Number: 2015-00053342, filed 10/13/15]

NOTE: Further research needed to confirm whether these liens have been resolved.

2018: Kim Listed An IRS Liability Worth Between $10,000 And $15,000 On Her Federal Personal Financial Disclosure

Kim Owed The IRS Between $10,000 And $15,000 For Taxes Due In 2009 And 2010. [Kim 2018 Public Financial Disclosure Report, filed 2/15/18]

2010-2015: Kim Received An Annual $7,000 Homeowner Exemption For 1321 Smoke Tree Ct, An Address She Owned But At Which She Had Not Lived Since 2012

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Accused Kim Of Illegally Claiming Homeowner’s Tax Exemptions

5 Sharon Quirk-Silva’s Campaign Accused Kim Of Illegally Claiming A Homeowner’s Exemption And Paying Money Owed Only After The Issue Was Raised. “The campaign of Assembly District candidate Sharon Quirk- Silva called on her opponent, Young Kim, to explain her actions after Kim was caught red-handed on property taxes she owed for a homeowner’s exemption she illegally claimed. The Kim campaign issued a statement earlier denying that Kim had ‘illegally claimed a homeowners’ credit,’ calling the accusation ‘false’ and saying that ‘her property taxes are paid in full.’ Her campaign left out an important detail: Young Kim admitted owing yesterday when she finally paid up on her taxes —but only after the Quirk-Silva campaign pointed out her being a tax deadbeat to voters. Then, instead of simply paying up and admitting to the back taxes, issued false denials.” [Sharon Quirk-Silva for Assembly 2016, press release, 9/30/16]

NOTE: According to a press release published by Sharon Quirk-Silva, Kim denied owing property taxes for claiming a homeowner exemption at an address at which she did not reside but paid back the amount claimed. Further research needed to confirm this payment.

2010-2015: Kim Received A $7,000 Per Year Homeowner Exemption For 1321 Smoke Tree Ct…

2014-2015: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2014-2015, accessed 3/5/18]

2013-2014: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2013-2014, accessed 3/5/18]

2012-2013: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2012-2013, accessed 3/5/18]

2011-2012: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2011-2012, accessed 3/5/18]

2010-2011: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2010-2011, accessed 3/5/18]

…But Moved From La Habra To Fullerton In 2012 To Run For State Assembly

2012: Kim Moved From La Habra To California’s 65th Assembly District. “Kim, also 51, worked in parts of the district for 20 years as an aide to Rep. Ed Royce, R-Fullerton, and moved into the district [California’s 65th Assembly District] in December 2012 from nearby La Habra.” [Orange County Register, 5/18/14]

2014-Present: Kim Was Registered To Vote At 2154 Seaview Drive, Fullerton, CA 92833. [State of California, Public Access Voter Lookup, registered 12/23/14; Votebuilder, accessed 2/27/18]

2012-2014: Kim Registered To Vote At 1234 Starbuck St, Fullerton, CA, As A Republican. [State of California, California Voter Registration Form – Young O. Kim, signed 12/31/12; State of California, Public Access Voter Lookup, registered 12/23/14; Votebuilder, accessed 2/27/18]

2014-2015: Kim Rented Out The Property For Which She Received A Homestead Exemption

2014-2015: Kim Rented Out 1321 Smoke Tree Ct And Reported Between $10,001 And $100,000 Per Year In Gross Income Received. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 – 2014, filed 2/24/15; Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16]

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Challenged Kim To Release Her Tax Returns After Accusing Her And Her Husband Of Improperly Disclosing Their Income On Official Forms

6 2016: Sharon Quirk-Silva Challenged Kim To Release Her Tax Returns

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Challenged Kim To Release Her Tax Returns. “‘Yesterday marked 100 days since Sharon released five years of her taxes and called on Kim to do the same, under the idea that confidence in government depends on some level of confidence in our leaders,’ writes Matt Reilly, Quirk-Silva’s campaign spokesman, in an email last week. ‘Like Trump, she has repeatedly refused. For Trump, it likely is about private dealings that paint him in a horrible light. For Kim, who has been in government for the past five tax years, this should be easy—what’s to hide if you work as a congressional aide, do campaign work on the side, or collect an Assembly paycheck?’” [Orange County Weekly, 8/1/16]

HEADLINE: Young Kim Accused Of Pulling A Trump With Her Taxes By Assembly Challenger. [Orange County Weekly, 8/1/16]

2016: Sharon Quirk-Silva Accused Kim And Her Husband Of Improperly Disclosing Their Income On Their Statements Of Economic Interests

2016: Kim’s Opponent Accused Her And Her Husband Of Improperly Disclosing Their Income On Their Statements Of Economic Interest. “[Matt Reilly, Quirk-Silva’s campaign spokesman] ‘More broadly, she and her husband fail to properly disclose their income on their statement of economic interests for several years. If they’re not complying with open government laws, are they failing to comply with federal tax laws, too?’” [Orange County Weekly, 8/1/16]

2018: Kim Only Released Tax Returns From 2015 And 2016, Years When She Received An Assembly Salary, But Ignored The Other Years In Question

2018: Kim Only Released Tax Returns For FY 2016 and FY 2015, Years In Which She Received An Assembly Paycheck. [Young Kim for Congress 2018, Young Kim’s Tax Returns, prepared 4/25/17; prepared 1/10/18]

2009-2012. Kim’s Husband, Charles, Filed Statements Of Economic Interest. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700, filed 4/16/13; filed 3/20/12; filed 3/30/11; filed 4/9/10; filed 3/18/09; signed 8/15/09]

…While Taking Millions In Taxpayer-Funded Salaries & Benefits Throughout Her Career In Politics…

Kim Received More Than $1.28 Million In Taxpayer-Funded Salaries & Benefits

Kim Total Taxpayer-Funded Salaries & Benefits Source Amount California State Salary $191,842.00 California Member Per Diem $69,272.00 California Travel & Per Diem $28,225.86 Congressional Salary $948,664.03 Congressional Reimbursements $39,099.87 Congressional Bonus $7,500.00 Total: $1,284,603.76

Kim Even Charged Californians For Days She Did Not Show Up For Work

7 Kim Received $512 In Taxpayer-Funded Compensation On Days She Was Absent From The Legislature

December 2014 – August 2016: Kim Received $512 In Taxpayer-Funded Compensation On Days She Was Absent From The Legislature. “Here is a list of current members of the state Legislature, the total number of days they were absent, and how much per diem each lawmaker collected on days they were absent during the most recent legislative session, from Dec. 1, 2014 to Aug. 8, 2016. […] Young Kim, R-Fullerton, 11 absences, $512.” [Associated Press, 9/20/16]

The Taxpayer-Funded Compensation Eased The Costs Of Living Away From Home For Legislators Working In Sacramento During Session. “California lawmakers are eligible to receive $176 per day for lodging and food for each day the Legislature is in session to compensate them for being away from home, on top of their annual six-figure salaries.” [Associated Press, 9/20/16]

Kim Elected To Receive Her Taxpayer-Funded Food And Lodging Per Diem When She Was Absent From The Legislature. “A review by The Associated Press finds lawmakers routinely collect the payments on days they don't go to work, under rules they set for themselves, or if they say they are working away from Sacramento. Here is a list of current members of the state Legislature, the total number of days they were absent, and how much per diem each lawmaker collected on days they were absent during the most recent legislative session, from Dec. 1, 2014 to Aug. 8, 2016. […] Young Kim, R-Fullerton, 11 absences, $512.” [Associated Press, 9/20/16]

Double-Dipping: Kim Pocketed An Additional $32,500 In Campaign Cash – On Top Of Her Taxpayer-Funded Salary – To “Consult” On Her Boss’ Campaign

2012: Kim Received $32,500 In Salary From Rep. Ed Royce’s Campaign. [FEC, Disbursements, 11/16/12; 11/8/12; 10/1/12; 8/30/12; 8/30/12; 8/1/12; 7/31/12; 7/1/12; 5/31/12; 5/1/12; 4/2/12; 2/29/12; 1/31/12; 1/9/12]

Kim’s Salary From Royce’s Campaign Committee (2012) Date Description Amount 11/6/12 Payroll $1,500.00 11/8/12 Payroll $2,250.00 10/1/12 Payroll $1,875.00 8/30/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 8/30/12 Campaign Consulting $5,000.00 8/1/12 Campaign Consulting $1,875.00 7/31/12 Campaign Consulting $5,000.00 7/1/12 Campaign Consulting $1,875.00 5/31/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 5/1/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 4/2/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 2/29/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 1/31/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 1/9/12 Campaign Staff $1,875.00 TOTAL $32,500.00 [FEC, Disbursements, 11/16/12; 11/8/12; 10/1/12; 8/30/12; 8/30/12; 8/1/12; 7/31/12; 7/1/12; 5/31/12; 5/1/12; 4/2/12; 2/29/12; 1/31/12; 1/9/12]

And Taxpayers Will Continue To Foot The Bill For Kim’s $30,000 Pension

Kim Would Receive Approximately $30,784.17 Per Year In Taxpayer-Funded Pension

1993-2013: Kim Served As A Congressional Staffer For Rep. Ed Royce. [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

2013: Kim Received $99,625 As A Member Of Royce’s Staff. [Legistorm, Congressional Staffer – Salary Data, accessed 1/30/18; House of Representatives, Statement of Disbursements – 2013 Q3; 2013 Q2; 2013 Q1; accessed 2/28/18]

2012: Kim Received $78,000 As A Member Of Royce’s Staff. [Legistorm, Congressional Staff – Salary Data, accessed 1/30/18; House of Representatives, Statement of Disbursements – 2012 Q4; 2012 Q3; 2012 Q2; 2012 Q1; accessed 2/28/18]

2011: Kim Received $94,000 As A Member Of Royce’s Staff. [Legistorm, Congressional Staffer – Salary Data, accessed 1/30/18; House of Representatives, Statement of Disbursements – 2011 Q4; 2011 Q3; 2011 Q2; 2011 Q1; accessed 2/28/18]

According to the Office of Personnel Management, a “Member of Congress or Congressional Employee (or any combination of the two) must have at least 5 years of service as a Member of Congress and/or Congressional Employee” to qualify for their retirement annuity.

The annual pension is calculated as “1.7% of your high-3 average salary multiplied by your years of service as a Member of Congress or Congressional Employee which do not exceed 20, PLUS 1% of your high-3 average salary multiplied by your years of other service.” [Office of Personnel Management, accessed 7/18/17]

For Members who joined after 1991, the annual pension is calculated as:

[The Atlantic, 10/2/15; Congressional Research Service, 11/10/16]

9 Kim’s Exaggerated Business “Experience”

Summary

 During her 2014 bid for California Assembly, Kim requested she be listed as a small businesswoman on the ballot, a request that was met by a complaint from her opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva. Quirk-Silva alleged that designating Kim as a small businesswoman was “inaccurate and misleading.” Quirk-Silva further argued that Kim’s financial disclosures, which she filed as an Assembly candidate, showed no income from Kim’s ‘small business,’ Y.K. Connections.

 Kim did not disclose any earned income from Y.K. Connections between 2014 and 2017, years in which she annually filed personal financial disclosures with the State of California (2014-2016) and the federal government (2017).

 On her California Statement of Economic Interests, Kim reported that Y.K. Connections grossed an annual income of between $1,001 and $10,000 but did not disclose an exact number. Kim also listed a relatively small Fair Market Value for Y.K. Connections, listing it between $2,000 and $10,000. Kim did not report any earned income from the business on those same forms. For 2017, Kim did not report an earned income from Y.K. Connections nor did she list her ownership of the company. In fact, she did not mention Y.K. Connections on her 2017 Personal Financial Disclosures.

 Despite this lack of income, Kim reportedly loaned herself between $10,001 and $100,000 from her own Fictitious Business Name, essentially loaning money to herself.

2018: Kim Listed Herself As A “Businesswoman” And A “Small Business Owner” On Her Campaign Website

2018: Kim Listed Herself As A “Small Business Owner” And A “Businesswoman” On Her Campaign Website. “Kim’s career began as a small business owner and financial analyst. […] Young Kim is a community leader, businesswoman and public servant, all while being a mother to four children and wife to her husband Charles.” [Young Kim for Congress, About Young Kim, accessed 3/7/18]

In 2014, Kim Insisted She Be Labeled As A “Small Businesswoman”

March 2014: Kim Requested She Be Listed On The Ballot As A Small Businesswoman, Despite Having Spent The Previous 20 Years As An Aide To Rep. Ed Royce

March 2014: Kim Requested That She Be Listed On The Ballot As A Small Businesswoman, Though She Had Spent 20 Years As An Aid To Royce. “Kim's election filings request that she be listed on the ballot as a ‘small-business woman.’ […] Republican Young Kim, who spent 20 years as an aide to Rep. Ed Royce, R- Fullerton, before retiring in September, is running against Quirk-Silva, D-Fullerton, in what is expected to be one of the state's tightest Assembly races.” [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

Kim’s Opponent Filed A Complaint Alleging Kim’s Designation As A Businesswoman Was “Inaccurate And Misleading”

10 misleading’ and asking that it not appear on the ballot. Republican Young Kim, who spent 20 years as an aide to Rep. Ed Royce, R-Fullerton, before retiring in September, is running against Quirk-Silva, D-Fullerton, in what is expected to be one of the state's tightest Assembly races. [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

Quirk-Silva’s Attorneys Claimed That Kim’s Financial Disclosures Showed No Income From Her Work At Y.K. Connections. “Quirk-Silva's lawyers argue that Kim's financial disclosures filed last week show no income from her business and that it has no website. Kim political consultant Dave Gilliard countered that she legally established the business last year and started making money from it only this year.” [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

NOTE: The resolution of Quirk-Silva’s complaint was unclear. Further research needed.

Kim Claimed She Had Owned Her Small For More Than A Decade – But Records Show She Did Not Register The Business Until After Launching Her 2014 Campaign

Kim Claimed She Owned Her Business For More Than A Decade

Kim Claimed She Owned Y.K. Connections Prior To Working With Royce

Kim Claimed She Owned Y.K. Connections Prior To Working With Royce. “‘I had this business [Y.K. Connections] before I started working for Ed Royce,’ Kim said. ‘After I left Ed's office last fall, I re-activated the business, and it is currently my only occupation.’” [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

Kim Claimed She Performed “General Consulting For Small Businesses” Through Her Business, Y.K. Connections. “Before the complaint was filed, Kim told the Register she is doing ‘general consulting for small businesses’ under the name Y.K. Connections. ‘I had this business before I started working for Ed Royce,’ Kim said. ‘After I left Ed's office last fall, I re-activated the business, and it is currently my only occupation.’” [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

Kim Worked For Royce For At Least 13 Years

September 2014: Kim Spent 20 Years As An Aide To Rep. Ed Royce Before Retiring. “Republican Young Kim, who spent 20 years as an aide to Rep. Ed Royce, R-Fullerton, before retiring in September, is running against Quirk-Silva, D-Fullerton, in what is expected to be one of the state's tightest Assembly races.” [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

But In Fact, She Only Registered The Business More Than Four Months After Launching Her Assembly Campaign

December 3, 2013: Kim Registered Y.K. Connections As Her Fictitious Business Name In Orange County. [Orange County Clerk-Recorder, Fictitious Business Name search, accessed 2/28/18]

July 22, 2013: Kim Began Fundraising For Her Assembly Campaign. According to contribution reports, Kim’s candidacy and fundraising for the 2014 race for California’s 65th Assembly District dated back as far as July 22, 2013. [Secretary of State, Campaign Finance – Electronic Filings, accessed 3/2/18]

Kim Did Not Disclose Any Income From Y.K. Connections

Kim Failed To Disclose Any Income, Including Any Earned From Y.K. Connections, Despite Reporting A Range For Gross Income Received

11 2017: Kim Did Not Disclose Any Earned Income. [Kim 2018 Public Financial Disclosure Report, filed 2/15/18]

2014-2016: Kim Did Not Report Any Earned Income From Y.K. Connections. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

2014-2016: Kim Listed Y.K. Connections’ Revenue At $1,001 And $10,000 In Gross Income Received. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

Investments, Income, and Assets of Business Entities/Trusts (2014-2016) Year Business Name Address Fair Market Gross Reportable Entity or Value Income Single Trust Received Source Income > $10,000 2016 Business Entity Y.K. 2154 Seaview Drive, $2,000 - $1,001 - None Connections Fullerton, CA 92833 $10,000 $10,000 2015 Business Entity Y.K. 2154 Seaview Drive, $2,000 - $1,001 - None Connections Fullerton, CA 92833 $10,000 $10,000 2014 Business Entity Y.K. 2154 Seaview Drive, $2,000 - $1,001 - None Connections Fullerton, CA 92833 $10,000 $10,000 [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

2014-2016: Kim Reported A Small Fair Market Value, Between $2,000 To $10,000, For Y.K. Connections

2014-2016: Kim Reported Y.K. Connections’ Fair Market Value Between $2,000 To $10,000. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

Kim Did Not Report The Business At All On Her Federal Personal Financial Disclosure

2017: Kim Did Not Report The Existence Or Her Ownership Of Y.K. Connections On Her Federal Financial Disclosure Report. [Kim 2018 Public Financial Disclosure Report, filed 2/15/18]

Despite Its Lack Of Income, Kim Loaned Herself Money Through Y.K. Connections

2014-2016: Kim Reported A Loan Valued At $10,001 And $100,000 With Y.K. Connections, Her Fictitious Business Name, Listed As The Lender

2014-2016: Kim Listed Her Company, Y.K. Connections, As Lender For A Loan Valued Between $10,001 And $100,000. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

2016: Y.K. Connections’ Loan Dropped Its Interest Rate To 4 Percent. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17]

12 2014-2015: Kim Reported An Interest Rate Of 4.25 Percent For Her Loan From Y.K. Connections. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17]

13 Key Visuals

Video

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Released A Campaign Ad Comparing Young Kim To Donald Trump

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Released A Campaign Ad Comparing Young Kim To Donald Trump. SINGER: “You’re [Young Kim] against women, freedom, having the right to choose. Young Kim is like Donald Trump […] don’t vote for her because she’s just like Donald Trump. She’s a walking puppet for him, Donald Trump.” […] DISCLAIMER: “[The ad was] paid for by Sharon Quirk-Silva for Assembly 2016.” [Young Kim is Like Donald Trump via YouTube, 10/13/16]

2013: Kim Said Her Latina Opponent Could Not Claim The Benefits Of Being A Minority Woman Because “Hispanics” Did Not Come Out To Vote

2013: Kim Said Her Latina Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Could Not Claim The Benefits Of Being A Minority Woman Because Asian Americans “Come Out And Vote, Unlike The Hispanics.” YOUNG KIM: “In the last redistricting cycle, has turned into 1/3 Asian, 1/3 Hispanic, 1/3 Caucasian. She’s Hispanic; I’m Asian. She’s a Latina Democrat; I’m Asian Republic. She’s a woman; I’m a woman. Okay. She had the advantage of being a minority, a woman […] I am going to infiltrate into Sharon Quirk-Silva’s comfort zone – and I’m going to take her voters away.” INTERVIEWER: “And what is her ‘comfort zone’?” KIM: “Woman. Minority. She’s not going to claim all those to her benefit, because I am going after the minority group that is hugely popular, Asian Americans. They come out and vote, unlike the Hispanics.” [Brightcove via SFGate, 10/6/13]

Kim Discussed Her Early Life, Coming To The United States, And Religion

Kim Attended High School In Hawaii. “I was born in Incheon, Korea, which is famous for McArthur landing. And from there, I finished my elementary school and went to Guam, finished my junior high there, and then went to Hawaii for my high school education.” [TherapyCable via YouTube, 12/26/16]

Kim Attended Middle School In Guam. KIM: “I was born in Incheon, Korea, which is famous for McArthur landing. And from there, I finished my elementary school and went to Guam, finished my junior high there, and then went to Hawaii for my high school education.” [TherapyCable via YouTube, 12/26/16]

Kim Attended Elementary School In South Korea. KIM: “I was born in Incheon, Korea, which is famous for McArthur landing. And from there, I finished my elementary school and went to Guam, finished my junior high there, and then went to Hawaii for my high school education.” [TherapyCable via YouTube, 12/26/16]

Kim Was Born In Incheon, Korea. “I was born in Incheon, Korea, which is famous for McArthur landing. And from there, I finished my elementary school and went to Guam, finished my junior high there, and then went to Hawaii for my high school education.” [TherapyCable via YouTube, 12/26/16]

Kim Identified As Christian. KIM: “Being a Christian myself, too, I’m not shy to proclaim my faith.” [TherapyCable via YouTube, 12/26/16]

Images

Young Kim with Paul Ryan:

Headlines

2016 Assembly Race

HEADLINE: Assemblywoman Young Kim Concedes In Orange County Race Against Sharon Quirk-Silva. [Los Angeles Times, 11/17/16]

2016 Presidential Election

HEADLINE: Young Kim Accused Of Pulling A Trump With Her Taxes By Assembly Challenger. [Orange County Weekly, 8/1/16]

HEADLINE: California Republican Lawmakers’ Presidential Pick: “I Don’t Know.” [Sacramento Bee, 1/5/16]

HEADLINE: 2 GOP Candidates Steer Clear Of Trump. [Orange County Register, 8/22/16]

2014 Assembly Election

HEADLINE: Low Turnout, High Enthusiasm Fueled GOP Wins. [Orange County Register, 11/7/14]

Personal Finance

In 2017, Kim had an estimated net worth of between $254,018 and $1,474,999.

According to Kim’s federal personal financial disclosures, her 2017 annual unearned income was between $1,001 and $2,500. Kim’s assets totaled between $769,018 and $1,735,000. Kim had between $260,001 and $515,000 in liabilities.

Kim’s Federal Personal Financial Disclosure Summary

Kim PFD Toplines Year Earned Asset Value Unearned Income Transactions Liabilities Income MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX 2017 None $769,018 $1,735,000 $1,001 $2,500 - - $260,001 $515,000 disclosed [Kim 2018 Public Financial Disclosure Report, filed 2/15/18]

NOTE Kim reported at least $14,800 in earned income for 2016 in her 2018 Federal Personal Financial Disclosure Summary. Further research needed to identify other sources of income in 2016.

Kim’s State Personal Financial Disclosure Summary

State Personal Financial Disclosure

Business Entity Or Trust

Investments, Income, and Assets of Business Entities/Trusts (2014-2016) Year Business Name Address Fair Market Gross Reportable Entity or Value Income Single Trust Received Source Income > $10,000 2016 Business Y.K. 2154 Seaview Drive, $2,000 - $1,001 - None Entity Connections Fullerton, CA 92833 $10,000 $10,000 2015 Business Y.K. 2154 Seaview Drive, $2,000 - $1,001 - None Entity Connections Fullerton, CA 92833 $10,000 $10,000 2014 Business Y.K. 2154 Seaview Drive, $2,000 - $1,001 - None Entity Connections Fullerton, CA 92833 $10,000 $10,000 [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

Interest In Real Property

Interest in Real Property (Including Rental Income) Year Assessor’s Parcel Fair Nature of Interest Gross Income Source of Number or Address Market Received (Rental) Rental Value Income 2016 1321 Smoketree Court, La $100,001 - Ownership/Deed None None Habra, CA 90631 $1,000,000 of Trust 16 2015 1321 Smoke Tree Ct. La $100,001 - Ownership/Deed $10,001 - $100,000 None Habra, CA 90631 $1,000,000 of Trust 2014 1321 Smoke Tree Ct., La $100,001 - Ownership/Deed $10,001 - $100,000 None Habra, CA 90631 $1,000,000 of Trust [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

Earned Income

2014-2016: Kim Did Not Report Any Income Received. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

Loans

2016: Y.K. Connections’ Loan Dropped Its Interest Rate To 4 Percent. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17]

2014-2015: Kim Reported An Interest Rate Of 4.25 Percent For Her Loan From Y.K. Connections. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17]

Gifts

2016: Kim Did Not Report Any Gifts. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17]

2014-2015: Kim Accepted $700.54 In Gifts. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

Income – Gifts (2014-2016) Year Name of Source Business Activity Date Received Value Description 2015 Women in California Women Advocacy 1/1/15 $90.15 Food & Beverage Leadership 2015 SoCal Gas/Sempra Energy 4/14/15 $107.56 Dinner Energy 2015 Viejas Band of Tribal Government 2/13/15 $95.64 Dinner Kumeyaay Indians 2015 League of CA Cities – City Government 8/6/15 $50.00 Dinner LA County Division 2015 Personal Insurance Insurance Federation 2/12/15 $75.29 Reception Federation of California 2015 Serving California Advocacy 5/20/15 $67.00 Dinner 2015 Shen Yun Performing Performing Arts 1/30/15 $180.00 Shen Yun 2015 Arts Ticket 2014 California Healthcare 2014 CHI Life Sciences 12/4/15 $34.90 Meals Institute Academy Seminar TOTAL $700.54 17 [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

Travel Payments And Reimbursements

2016: Kim Did Not Report Any Travel Payments, Advances, Or Reimbursements. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2016, filed 1/3/17]

2014-2015: Kim Accepted $17,911.25 In Travel Payments And Reimbursements. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

2015: Kim Accepted $17,377 In Gifts From Foreign Governments To Travel The World. [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16]

Income – Travel Payments, Advance, And Reimbursements Year Name of City and Business Dates Amount Travel Source State Activity Destination 2015 Ministry of Consulate Government 7/20/15 – $8,870.00 South Korea Foreign Entity 7/26/15 Affairs, Republic of Korea 2015 Ministry of Consulate Government 7/26/15 – $8,500.00 Taiwan Foreign Entity 8/1/15 Affairs, Republic of China Taiwan 2014 California Sacramento, 2014 CHI Life 12/4/14 – $534.25 Sacramento Healthcare CA Sciences 12/15/14 Institute Academy Seminar TOTAL $17,911.25 [California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2015, filed 2/25/16; California Fair Political Practices Commission, Form 700 - 2014, filed 2/24/15]

Tax Returns

2018: Kim Released Copies Of Her 2015 And 2016 Tax Returns, The Only Years She Received An Assembly Paycheck

2018: Kim Released Copies Of Her 2015 And 2016 Tax Returns On Her Campaign Website. [Young Kim for Congress 2018, Young Kim’s Tax Returns, prepared 4/25/17; prepared 1/10/18]

2016: Kim Received Pressure From Her Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, To Release Her Tax Returns. “‘Yesterday marked 100 days since Sharon released five years of her taxes and called on Kim to do the same, under the idea that confidence in government depends on some level of confidence in our leaders,’ writes Matt Reilly, Quirk-Silva’s campaign spokesman, in an email last week. ‘Like Trump, she has repeatedly refused. For Trump, it likely is about private dealings that paint him in a horrible light. For Kim, who has been in government for the past five tax years, this should be easy—what’s to hide if you work as a congressional aide, do campaign work on the side, or collect an Assembly paycheck?’” [Orange County Weekly, 8/1/16]

18 2018: Kim Displayed Her Income Tax Return On Her Campaign Website. “Kim had been running for Orange County supervisor, but seamlessly transformed her website to declare Kim for Congress. Unlike our foul-mouthed president, Kim displayed her income tax return for the world to see on her website.” [Sacramento Bee, 1/14/18]

2016 Tax Returns

2016: Kim And Her Husband Reported $119,260 In Income

2016: Kim And Her Husband Reported $119,260 In Income. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

Kim And Her Husband Reported $92,707 In Wages, Salaries, Tips, Etc. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

Kim And Her Husband Reported A $988 Loss In Their Business Income. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

Kim And Her Husband Reported $27,420 In Pensions And Annuities. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

Kim And Her Husband Reported $86 In Rental Real Estate, Royalties, Partnerships, S Corporations, Trusts, Etc. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

2016: Kim And Her Husband Did Not Report Any Adjusted Gross Income

2016: Kim And Her Husband Did Not Report Any Adjusted Gross Income. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

2016: Kim Reported $12,600 In Itemized Deductions

2016: Kim Reported $12,600 In Itemized Deductions. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

2016: Kim Reported $12,150 In Exemptions

2016: Kim Reported $12,150 In Exemptions. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

2016: Kim Reported $94,510 In Taxable Income

2016: Kim Reported $94,510 In Taxable Income. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

2016: Kim Reported $10,137 In Federal Income Tax Withheld

2016: Kim Reported $10,137 In Federal Income Tax Withheld. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

19 2016: Kim And Her Husband Owed $2,537 In Taxes

2016: Kim And Her Husband Owed $2,537 In Taxes. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

2016: Charles Kim Listed His Occupation As “Self-Employed”

2016: Charles Kim Listed His Occupation As “Self-Employed.” [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

2016: Kim Listed One Daughter As A Dependent

2016: Kim Listed One Daughter As A Dependent. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 4/25/17]

2015 Tax Returns

2015: Kim And Her Husband Reported $112,062 In Income

2015: Kim And Her Husband Reported $112,062 In Income. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

Kim And Her Husband Reported $90,562 In Wages, Salaries, Tips. Etc. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

Kim And Her Husband Reported $1,250 In Business Income. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

Kim And Her Husband Reported $27,241 In Pensions And Annuities. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

Kim And Her Husband Reported A $7,025 Loss On Rental Real Estate, Royalties, Partnerships, S Corporations, Trusts, Etc. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Reported $89 In Adjusted Gross Income

2015: Kim Reported $89 In Adjust Gross Income. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Reported $12,600 In Itemized Deductions

2015: Kim Reported $12,600 In Itemized Deductions. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Reported $16,000 In Exemptions

2015: Kim Reported $16,000 In Exemptions. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Reported $83,373 In Taxable Income

20 2015: Kim Reported $83,373 In Taxable Income. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Reported $1,500 In Education Credits

2015: Kim Reported $1,500 In Education Credits. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Reported $177 In Self-Employment Tax

2015: Kim Reported $177 In Self-Employment Tax. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Reported $11,810 In Total Payments

2015: Kim Reported $11,810 In Total Payments. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

Kim Reported $9,810 In Federal Income Tax Withheld. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

Kim Reported $1,000 In Estimated Tax Payments And Amount Applied From 2014 Returns. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

Kim Reported $1,000 From The American Opportunity Credit. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Received A $702 Refund

2015: Kim Received A $702 Refund. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Kim Listed Two Dependents

2015: Kim Listed Her Son And One Daughter As Dependents. [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

2015: Charles Kim Listed His Occupation As “Self-Employed”

2015: Charles Kim Listed His Occupation As “Self-Employed.” [Young And Charles Kim U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, prepared 1/10/18]

Taxpayer-Funded Salaries

Kim Received A Total Of More Than $1.28 Million In Taxpayer-Funded Salaries & Benefits

Kim Total Taxpayer-Funded Salaries & Benefits Source Amount California State Salary $191,842.00 California Member Per Diem $69,272.00 California Travel & Per Diem $28,225.86 Congressional Salary $948,664.03 21 Congressional Reimbursements $39,099.87 Congressional Bonus $7,500.00 Total: $1,284,603.76 Note: See individual sections below for citations.

California Taxpayer-Funded Salaries

2015-2016: Kim Reportedly Earned $95,291 Per Year, Or A Total Of $190,582, As A Member Of The Assembly

Kim Received An Annual Salary Of $95,291 As A Member Of The Assembly. [California State Assembly, Salaries and Expenditures – Assembly Member Salaries, updated 12/12/14; updated 1/11/16; updated 4/18/16]

2016: Kim Received $95,291 As A Member Of The Assembly. [California State Assembly, Salaries and Expenditures – Assembly Member Salaries, updated 12/12/14; updated 1/11/16; updated 4/18/16]

2015: Kim Received $95,291 As A Member Of The Assembly. [California State Assembly, Salaries and Expenditures – Assembly Member Salaries, updated 12/12/14; updated 1/11/16; updated 4/18/16]

2015-2016: Kim Received $190,582 As A Member Of The Assembly. [California State Assembly, Salaries and Expenditures – Assembly Member Salaries, updated 12/12/14; updated 1/11/16; updated 4/18/16]

NOTE: California Assembly Member Salaries were updated in December 2014, January 2016, and April 2016. Each of these documents confirmed that Kim’s annual salary as a member of the Assembly stood at $95,291. However, a records request to receive an updated annual salary to confirm Kim’s 2016 salary is needed.

Kim Took $69,272 In California Member Per Diem (General Fund)

2015-2016: Kim Took $69,272 In Member Per Diem (General Fund). [California Assembly, Assembly Journal, published 2/28/17; published 2/29/16]

2016: Kim Took $34,496 In Member Per-Diem (General Fund). [California Assembly, Assembly Journal, published 2/28/17]

2015: Kim Took $34,776.00 In Member Per Diem (General Fund). [California Assembly, Assembly Journal, published 2/29/16]

Kim Took $28,225. 86 In California Travel & Per Diem

2015-2016: Kim Took $28,225.86 In California Travel & Per Diem. [California Assembly, Assembly Journal, published 2/28/17; published 2/29/16]

2016: Kim Took $14,067 In Travel & Per Diem. [California Assembly, Assembly Journal, published 2/28/17]

2015: Kim Took $14,158.86 In Travel & Per Diem. [California Assembly, Assembly Journal, published 2/29/16]

Kim Received $512 In Taxpayer-Funded Compensation On Days She Was Absent From The Legislature

December 2014 – August 2016: Kim Received $512 In Taxpayer-Funded Compensation On Days She Was Absent From The Legislature. “Here is a list of current members of the state Legislature, the total number of days they were absent, and how much per diem each lawmaker collected on days they were absent during the most 22 recent legislative session, from Dec. 1, 2014 to Aug. 8, 2016. […] Young Kim, R-Fullerton, 11 absences, $512.” [Associated Press, 9/20/16]

Federal Taxpayer-Funded Salaries

2001-2013: Kim Received $948,664.03 As A Congressional Aide

Young Kim Congressional Salaries (2001-2013) Fiscal Total Year Compensation Position Notes Director, Asian Community 2013 $99,625.00 Relations Received $7,500 in "Other Compensation" Director, Asian Community 2012 $78,000.00 Relations Director, Asian Community 2011 $94,000.00 Relations Director, Asian Community 2010 $86,333.35 Relations Director, Asian Community 2009 $83,500.03 Relations Director, Asian Community 2008 $80,500.03 Relations Professional Staff Member at House Foreign Affairs Committee; Director, Asian Community Relations & Field 2007 $80,483.37 Representative for Rep. Ed Royce 2006 $76,000.01 Field Representative 2005 $69,499.99 Field Representative 2004 $65,699.98 Field Representative Professional Staff Member at House Foreign Affairs Committee; Field Representative 2003 $54,455.58 for Rep. Ed Royce 2002 $34,000.00 Field Representative 2001 $46,566.69 Field Representative TOTAL $948,664.03

23 [Legistorm, Congressional Staffer – Salary Data, accessed 1/30/18; U.S. House of Representatives, Statements of Disbursements, 2013 Q3; 2013 Q2; 2013 Q1; 2012 Q4; 2012 Q3; 2012 Q2; 2012 Q1; 2011 Q4; 2011 Q3; 2011 Q2; 2011 Q1; 2010 Q4; 2010 Q3; 2010 Q2; 2010 Q1; 2009 Q4; 2009 Q3; accessed 3/1/18]

NOTE: Further research needed to confirm Kim’s congressional salary between 2001 and Q2 2009 and all salary numbers prior to 2001.

2013: Kim Received An Additional $7,500 Upon Leaving Her Position At Royce’s Office, An Expense That Was Listed As “Other Compensation”

Q3 2013: Kim Received $7,500 During Her Last Pay Period With Royce’s Office, An Expense Listed As “Other Compensation.” [House of Representatives, Statement of Disbursements – 2013 Q3, accessed 2/28/18]

July 2009-June 2013: Kim Collected $39,099.87 In Personal, Taxpayer-Funded Reimbursements As A Congressional Aide

July 2009-June 2013: Kim Collected $39,099.87 In Personal Reimbursements As A Congressional Aide. [U.S. House of Representatives, Statements of Disbursements, 2013 Q3; 2013 Q2; 2013 Q1; 2012 Q4; 2012 Q3; 2012 Q2; 2012 Q1; 2011 Q4; 2011 Q3; 2011 Q2; 2011 Q1; 2010 Q4; 2010 Q3; 2010 Q2; 2010 Q1; 2009 Q4; 2009 Q3; accessed 3/1/18]

Personal Reimbursements To Kim Personal Year Reimbursements To Subject Kim 2013 (Q1 Commercial Transportation; Taxi/Parking/Tolls; Private Auto Mileage; Gasoline; $4,886.86 & Q2) Food & Beverage; Office Supplies (Outside) Private Auto Mileage; Taxi/Parking/Tolls; Food & Beverage; Commercial $6,931.25 2012 Transportation; Travel Subsistence; Private Auto Mileage; Taxi/Parking/Tolls; Commercial Transportation; Travel $12,801.21 2011 Subsistence; Food & Beverage; Postage/Courier/Box Rental; Private Auto Mileage; Taxi/Parking Tolls; Commercial Transportation; Travel $7,808.61 2010 Subsistence; Private Owned Vehicle Mileage; Food & Beverage 2009 Private Owned Vehicle Mileage; Commercial Transportation; Travel Reimbursement; $6,671.94 (Q3&Q4) Taxi/Parking/Tolls; Food & Beverage TOTAL $39,099.87 [U.S. House of Representatives, Statements of Disbursements, 2013 Q3; 2013 Q2; 2013 Q1; 2012 Q4; 2012 Q3; 2012 Q2; 2012 Q1; 2011 Q4; 2011 Q3; 2011 Q2; 2011 Q1; 2010 Q4; 2010 Q3; 2010 Q2; 2010 Q1; 2009 Q4; 2009 Q3; accessed 3/1/18]

NOTE: Records request needed to identify any personal reimbursements Kim received as a congressional aide prior to July 2009.

Taxpayer-Funded Pension

Kim Would Receive Approximately $30,784.17 Per Year In Taxpayer-Funded Pension

1993-2013: Kim Served As A Congressional Staffer For Rep. Ed Royce. [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

24 2012: Kim Received $78,000 As A Member Of Royce’s Staff. [Legistorm, Congressional Staff – Salary Data, accessed 1/30/18; House of Representatives, Statement of Disbursements – 2012 Q4; 2012 Q3; 2012 Q2; 2012 Q1; accessed 2/28/18]

For Members who joined after 1991, the annual pension is calculated as:

[The Atlantic, 10/2/15; Congressional Research Service, 11/10/16]

Campaign Salary

2012: Kim Received $32,500 In Salary From Rep. Ed Royce’s Campaign

25 Political Career

This section provides an overview of Kim’s political career, from 2013 to 2017.

Committees

2015-2016: Kim Was A Member Of The Jobs, Economic Development And The Economy Committee. “Assembly committees: Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy; Banking and Finance; Budget; Education; Transportation” [Sacramento Bee, 4/19/15]

2015-2016: Kim Was A Member of The Banking And Finance Committee. “Assembly committees: Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy; Banking and Finance; Budget; Education; Transportation” [Sacramento Bee, 4/19/15]

2015-2016: Kim Was A Member Of The Budget Committee. “Assembly committees: Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy; Banking and Finance; Budget; Education; Transportation” [Sacramento Bee, 4/19/15]

2015-2016: Kim Was A Member Of The Education Committee. “Assembly committees: Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy; Banking and Finance; Budget; Education; Transportation” [Sacramento Bee, 4/19/15]

2015-2016: Kim Was A Member Of The Transportation Committee. “Assembly committees: Jobs, Economic Development and the Economy; Banking and Finance; Budget; Education; Transportation” [Sacramento Bee, 4/19/15]

Campaigns

Election History

Young Kim Electoral History Year Office Candidates Results Kim Margin Sharon Quirk-Silva 53.2% California Assembly District 65 (D) -6.4% (General) Young Kim (R) 46.8% 2016 Sharon Quirk-Silva 54.3% California Assembly District 65 (D) -8.6% (Primary) Young Kim (R) 45.7% California Assembly District 65 Young Kim (R) 54.6% +9.2% (General) Sharon Quirk-Silva 45.4% 2014 Young Kim (R) 54.7% California Assembly District 65 Sharon Quirk-Silva 45.3% +9.4% (Primary) (D) [California Secretary of State, Statement of Vote – General Election 2016, accessed 2/28/18; Statement of Vote – Primary Election 2016, accessed 2/28/18; Statement of Vote – General Election 2014, accessed 2/28/18; Statement of Vote – Primary Election 2014, accessed 2/28/18]

2018 Congressional Bid

26 2018: Kim Announced Her Bid To Replace Retiring Rep. Ed Royce, Her Former Boss

January 2018: Kim Announced Her Bid For Congress After Rep. Ed Royce, Her Former Boss, Announced His Retirement. “A day after announcing he would retire at the end of 2018, Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton) has weighed in on who should replace him. Royce has endorsed former state legislator Young Kim, a one-term assemblywoman who was unseated in a 2016 rematch with Democrat Sharon Quirk-Silva. Kim worked in Royce’s district office before being elected to the Assembly. ‘I can attest to Young’s dedication and abilities because she worked for me for almost 20 years,’ Royce said in a statement. ‘She knows our district, its people and its needs. She is a tireless and dedicated public servant.’” [Los Angeles Times, 1/9/18]

Ed Royce Endorsed Kim To Replace Him In Congress. “A day after announcing he would retire at the end of 2018, Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton) has weighed in on who should replace him. Royce has endorsed former state legislator Young Kim, a one-term assemblywoman who was unseated in a 2016 rematch with Democrat Sharon Quirk-Silva.” [Los Angeles Times, 1/9/18]

2018: Kim Dropped Her County Campaign To Run For Congress

January 2018: Kim Dropped Her County Supervisor Campaign To Run For Congress. “Kim had been running for a seat on the Orange County Board of Supervisors, which is being vacated by fellow Republican Shawn Nelson. Kim went live with a congressional campaign website and social media accounts immediately after Royce’s endorsement was announced. Kim will drop her campaign for the county seat and open a campaign committee with the Federal Elections Commission in the coming days, said Dave Gilliard, campaign consultant to both Royce and Kim.” [Los Angeles Times, 1/9/18]

2017: Kim Announced She Would Run For County Supervisor Instead Of Launching A Third Assembly Run

February 2017: Kim Announced She Would Run For County Supervisor Over Launching A Third Assembly Run. “Young Kim's announcement last month that she'd run for county supervisor in 2018 was a surprise be-cause observers on both sides of the aisle expected her to mount a strong challenge Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk- Silva's 2018 reelection bid.” [Orange County Register, 3/6/17]

Orange County Register: Kim Was The Frontrunner To Replace Termed-Out Shawn Nelson As The Orange County Supervisor. “Young Kim's announcement last month that she'd run for county supervisor in 2018 was a surprise be-cause observers on both sides of the aisle expected her to mount a strong challenge Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva's 2018 reelection bid. Kim's decision makes her the frontrunner for the supervisor's seat being vacated by termed-out Shawn Nelson, and could make Quirk-Silva's reelection bid easier.” [Orange County Register, 3/6/17]

2016 Campaign For Assembly

Campaign Office Theft

November 2016: Kim Used A $10,000 Theft Of Equipment From Her Campaign Office In A Fundraising Pitch. “Thirty tablets and a laptop computer were stolen over the weekend from the Orange County campaign office of Republican Assemblywoman Young Kim, a spokesman said Monday. […] Kim used the theft in a fundraising pitch, asking supporters to donate to help her ‘fight these dirty tricks.’” [Associated Press, 11/1/16]

Kim’s Campaign Suggested The Theft Was Politically Motivated. “Kim's campaign speculated the break-in might be politically motivated. But her opponent in the race for California Assembly District 65, Democratic former Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva, denied her campaign had any connection to the burglary.” [Orange County Register, 11/2/16]

2014 Campaign For Assembly

2012: Kim Moved To The 65th District, Renting A Property Owned By One Of Her Campaign Donors, One Year Before Launching Her Campaign

Orange County Register: Kim Moved To The District From La Habra In 2012

2012: Kim Moved To The District From La Habra. “Kim, also 51, worked in parts of the district for 20 years as an aide to Rep. Ed Royce, R-Fullerton, and moved into the district in December 2012 from nearby La Habra.” [Orange County Register, 5/18/14]

Kim Moved Into A Rental In The District. “Young Kim, who is challenging Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk- Silva, D-Fullerton, moved into a rental in the district in December 2012.” [Orange County Register, 8/18/14]

December 2012: Kim Registered To Vote At 1234 Starbuck St

December 31, 2012: Kim Registered To Vote At 1234 Starbuck St, Fullerton, CA, As A Republican. [State of California, California Voter Registration Form – Young O. Kim, signed 12/31/12]

1234 Starbuck St Was Located In California’s 65th Assembly District, Where Kim Ran And Served In The Assembly. [California Secretary of State, Find Your California Representative, accessed 2/27/18]

2000-2012: Kim Was Registered To Vote At 1321 Smoke Tree Ct, La Habra, CA. [State of California – County of Orange, Voter Registration Form – Young O. Kim, signed 3/7/00; State of California, California Voter Registration Form – Young O. Kim, signed 12/31/12]

1321 Smoke Tree Ct Was Located In California’s 55th Assembly District. [California Secretary of State, Find Your California Representative, accessed 2/27/18]

2010-2017: Catherine Kyung Kim, Who Contributed To Young Kim’s Campaign And Charles Kim’s PAC, Owned 1234 Starbuck St

2010-2017: Catherine Kyung Kim Owned 1234 Starbuck St, Fullerton, CA, A Property Which Young Kim Rented To Run For Assembly, Until 2017. [Orange County Clerk-Recorder, Parcel ID: 280-341-10, filed 7/31/17]

2013: Bestland, LLC, Contributed $8,200 To Kim’s Campaign. [California Secretary of State, Contributions Search, 6/5/13]

Catherine Kim Listed Herself As An Initial Agent And Sole Manager Of Bestland, LLC. [California Secretary of State, LLC Articles of Organization, filed 9/10/09; Statement of Information, filed 2/25/14]

Kim’s Campaign Paid Bestland, LLC, $13,600 Three Months After The Company’s Contribution. [California Secretary of State, Kim For State Assembly 2014 – Expenditures Made, 9/3/13]

2013: Kim Began Fundraising For Her Assembly Campaign

2013: Kim Began Fundraising For Her Assembly Campaign. According to contribution reports, Kim’s candidacy and fundraising for the 2014 race for California’s 65th Assembly District dated back as far as July 22, 2013. [Secretary of State, Campaign Finance – Electronic Filings, accessed 3/2/18]

28 Kim Requested To Be Listed On The Ballot As A Small Businesswoman, A Request Which Was Contested By Her Opponent

March 2014: Kim Requested She Be Listed On The Ballot As A Small Businesswoman, Despite Having Spent The Previous 20 Years As An Aide To Rep. Ed Royce

Kim’s Opponent Filed A Complaint Alleging Kim’s Designation As A Businesswoman Was “Inaccurate And Misleading”

Kim’s Opponent, Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva, Filed A Complaint Alleging Kim’s Designation As A Businesswoman Was “Inaccurate And Misleading.” “Lawyers for Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva's reelection campaign filed a complaint Friday alleging that her opponent's ballot designation is ‘inaccurate and misleading’ and asking that it not appear on the ballot. Republican Young Kim, who spent 20 years as an aide to Rep. Ed Royce, R-Fullerton, before retiring in September, is running against Quirk-Silva, D-Fullerton, in what is expected to be one of the state's tightest Assembly races. [Orange County Register, 3/10/14]

NOTE: The resolution of Quirk-Silva’s complaint was unclear. Further research needed.

Kim Claimed She Performed General Consulting Through Her Small Business, Y.K. Connections

Y.K. Connections Was Not Registered As A Business, Only A Fictitious Business Name

December 3, 2013: Kim Registered Y.K. Connections As Her Fictitious Business Name In Orange County. [Orange County Clerk-Recorder, Fictitious Business Name search, accessed 2/28/18]

Kim Registered Y.K. Connections At 1234 Starbuck St., Fullerton, CA, Owned By Her Campaign Donor – Catherine Kim. [Orange County Clerk-Recorder, Fictitious Business Name search, accessed 2/28/18]

City Of Fullerton: Y.K. Connections Was Not Registered As A Business. [City of Fullerton, Public Records Request, received 2/1/18]

Kim Highlighted Her Career As Congressional Aide As Offering Her “Superior Insight” Into The Values Of The Constituents

Orange County Register: Kim Said Her 20 Years Working As A Congressional Aide Would Give Her Superior Insight Into The Values Of The District’s Constituents. “But Kim says her 20 years working as a congressional aide in the area - and three years as a state Senate aide while Royce served there - have given her superior insight into the values of the district's constituents. ‘I think that it's important to have worked in the district and know the pulse of the community,’ said Kim, 51. ‘I can really say it's got me in touch with the heartbeat of a very diverse community.’” [Orange County Register, 3/8/14]

October 2014: Kim Was Unable To Answer Questions Regarding Prominent Ballot Measures

Kim Was Unable To Answer Questions Regarding Two Ballot Propositions, Saying She Had Been Too Focused On The Race To Review Them. “Kim's been so busy with her campaign, she was caught off guard this week when asked by a reporter about three of the most prominent measures on the upcoming ballot. Quirk-Silva supports two of those measures - Proposition 1, a $7.5 billion water bond, and Proposition 2, a rainy day fund for the state budget. Quirk-Silva opposes the third, Proposition 47, which would reduce some felonies to misdemeanors. ‘I haven't taken a look at them,’ Kim said. ‘I've been so focused on my race.’ Two hours later, Kim emailed to say she opposes Props. 1 and 47 and supports Prop. 2.” [Orange County Register, 10/11/14]

Orange County Register: Kim Was Identified By Some As Mirroring The Positions Of Ed Royce

Orange County Register: Kim Was Identified By Some As Mirroring The Positions Of Ed Royce. “Kim is identified by some as mirroring the positions of Royce, although she has distinguished herself from her former boss on some immigration issues. Otherwise, she starts with a blank slate as she defines her-self for voters. Expect her opposition to dig for anything in her background that might dampen support.” [Orange County Register, 5/18/14]

Kim Was Named To The “California Trailblazer” Program, Which Recruited New, Fiscally Conservative Candidates

Kim Was Identified As A “California Traiblazer,” A Party Program Used To Recruit New And Fiscally Conservative Candidates. “She [Kim] has been identified as a ‘California Trailblazer,’ a party program to recruit a new generation of fiscally conservative leaders.” [Associated Press, 5/4/14]

2012 – Rep. Ed Royce’s Reelection Campaign

2012: Kim Received $32,500 In Salary From Rep. Ed Royce’s Campaign

30 7/1/12 Campaign Consulting $1,875.00 5/31/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 5/1/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 4/2/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 2/29/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 1/31/12 Campaign Consultant $1,875.00 1/9/12 Campaign Staff $1,875.00 TOTAL $32,500.00 [FEC, Disbursements, 11/16/12; 11/8/12; 10/1/12; 8/30/12; 8/30/12; 8/1/12; 7/31/12; 7/1/12; 5/31/12; 5/1/12; 4/2/12; 2/29/12; 1/31/12; 1/9/12]

31 Extreme Rhetoric

Items of Interest

 In 2014, Kim said she had an advantage in her assembly district race because she “looked like and talked like the district.”

 In 2013, Kim said her Latina opponent could not claim the benefits of being a minority woman because “Hispanics” did not come out to vote.

Racial Rhetoric

2014: Kim Said She Had An Advantage In Her Assembly District Race Because She “Looked Like And Talked Like The District”

2014: Kim Said She Had An Advantage In California’s 65th Assembly District Because She “Look[ed] Like And Talk[ed] Like The District.” “Kim, noting that Asian Americans are the fastest- growing ethnic group in North Orange County, says she has an advantage as ‘a candidate that looks like and talks like the district.’” [Los Angeles Times, 10/10/14]

2013: Kim Said Her Latina Opponent Could Not Claim The Benefits Of Being A Minority Woman Because “Hispanics” Did Not Come Out To Vote

32 Ethics

Significant Findings

 In 2015, Kim and her husband received two tax liens worth $387.35 for their failure to pay property taxes.

 In 2018, Kim listed an IRS liability worth between $10,000 and $15,000.

 In 2016, Kim’s opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, challenged Kim to release her tax returns and accused her and her husband of improperly disclosing their income on their personal financial disclosures.

Tax Problems

Kim And Her Husband Received Two Tax Liens Worth $387.35 For Their Failure To Pay Property Taxes

October 13, 2015: Young And Charles Kim Received A Lien For Their Failure To Pay $197.96 In Property Taxes. [Orange County Treasurer – Tax Collector, Document Number: 2015-00053342, filed 10/13/15]

NOTE: Further research needed to confirm whether these liens have been resolved.

2018: Kim Listed An IRS Liability Worth Between $10,000 And $15,000 On Her Federal Personal Financial Disclosure

Kim Owed The IRS Between $10,000 And $15,000 For Taxes Due In 2009 And 2010. [Kim 2018 Public Financial Disclosure Report, filed 2/15/18]

2010-2015: Kim Received An Annual $7,000 Homeowner Exemption For 1321 Smoke Tree Ct, An Address That She Owned But At Which She Had Not Lived Since 2012

2010-2015: Kim Received A $7,000 Per Year Homeowner Exemption For 1321 Smoke Tree Ct…

2014-2015: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2014-2015, accessed 3/5/18]

2013-2014: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2013-2014, accessed 3/5/18]

2012-2013: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2012-2013, accessed 3/5/18]

2011-2012: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2011-2012, accessed 3/5/18]

33 2010-2011: Kim Received A $7,000 Homeowner Exemption. [Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector, Property Tax Information, Parcel No: 019-423-28, FY 2010-2011, accessed 3/5/18]

…But Moved From La Habra To Fullerton In 2012 To Run For State Assembly

2014-Present: Kim Was Registered To Vote At 2154 Seaview Drive, Fullerton, CA 92833. [State of California, Public Access Voter Lookup, registered 12/23/14; Votebuilder, accessed 2/27/18]

2014-2015: Kim Rented Out The Property At Which She Received A Homestead Exemption

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Accused Kim Of Illegally Claiming Homeowner’s Tax Exemptions

Sharon Quirk-Silva’s Campaign Accused Kim Of Illegally Claiming A Homeowner’s Exemption And Paying Money Owed Only After The Issue Was Raised. “The campaign of Assembly District candidate Sharon Quirk- Silva called on her opponent, Young Kim, to explain her actions after Kim was caught red-handed on property taxes she owed for a homeowner’s exemption she illegally claimed. The Kim campaign issued a statement earlier denying that Kim had ‘illegally claimed a homeowners’ credit,’ calling the accusation ‘false’ and saying that ‘her property taxes are paid in full.’ Her campaign left out an important detail: Young Kim admitted owing yesterday when she finally paid up on her taxes —but only after the Quirk-Silva campaign pointed out her being a tax deadbeat to voters. Then, instead of simply paying up and admitting to the back taxes, issued false denials.” [Sharon Quirk-Silva for Assembly 2016, press release, 9/30/16]

Kim Reportedly Paid Back The Money She Received From Claiming A Homeowner’s Exemption. “The campaign of Assembly District candidate Sharon Quirk-Silva called on her opponent, Young Kim, to explain her actions after Kim was caught red-handed on property taxes she owed for a homeowner’s exemption she illegally claimed. The Kim campaign issued a statement earlier denying that Kim had ‘illegally claimed a homeowners’ credit,’ calling the accusation ‘false’ and saying that ‘her property taxes are paid in full.’ Her campaign left out an important detail: Young Kim admitted owing yesterday when she finally paid up on her taxes —but only after the Quirk-Silva campaign pointed out her being a tax deadbeat to voters. Then, instead of simply paying up and admitting to the back taxes, issued false denials.” [Sharon Quirk-Silva for Assembly 2016, press release, 9/30/16]

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Challenged Kim To Release Her Tax Returns After Accusing Her And Her Husband Of Improperly Disclosing Their Income On Official Forms

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Challenged Kim To Release Her Tax Returns. “‘Yesterday marked 100 days since Sharon released five years of her taxes and called on Kim to do the same, under the idea that confidence in government depends on some level of confidence in our leaders,’ writes Matt Reilly, Quirk-Silva’s campaign spokesman, in an email last week. ‘Like Trump, she has repeatedly refused. For Trump, it likely is about private dealings that paint him in a horrible light. For Kim, who has been in government for the past five tax years, 34 this should be easy—what’s to hide if you work as a congressional aide, do campaign work on the side, or collect an Assembly paycheck?’” [Orange County Weekly, 8/1/16]

HEADLINE: Young Kim Accused Of Pulling A Trump With Her Taxes By Assembly Challenger. [Orange County Weekly, 8/1/16]

35 Relationships

Significant Findings

 Kim was a 20-year congressional aide to Rep. Ed Royce.

 Catherine Kim owned 1234 Starbuck St, Fullerton, CA, a property which Young Kim rented to run for Assembly.

 Catherine Kim made campaign and PAC contributions via Bestland, LLC, a company solely managed by her, to Young and Charles Kim.

 Bestland, LLC, contributed $8,200 to Kim’s campaign.

 Bestland, LLC, made five contributions totaling $5,000 to the Inter-Community Network’s (iCAN) PAC, an organization for which Charles Kim served as president.

 Kim registered her consulting firm, Y.K. Consulting, at an address owned by Catherin Kim.

Ed Royce

Kim Was A Longtime Staffer To Rep. Ed Royce

September 2014: Kim Spent 20 Years As A Congressional Aide To Rep. Ed Royce

Kim’s Husband, Charles, Met Ed Royce While Promoting A Nonprofit Called The Korean American Coalition

Kim’s Husband, Charles, Met Ed Royce While Promoting A Nonprofit Called The Korean American Coalition. “That sense of public service first gleaned on Guam’s beaches led Kim to a job with Ed Royce, a former state senator and now congressman her husband had met while promoting a nonprofit called the Korean American Coalition.” [Sacramento Bee, 4/20/15]

2018: Royce Endorsed Kim To Replace Him In Congress One Day After Announcing His Retirement

36 Ed Royce Endorsed Kim To Replace Him In Congress. “A day after announcing he would retire at the end of 2018, Rep. Ed Royce (R-Fullerton) has weighed in on who should replace him. Royce has endorsed former state legislator Young Kim, a one-term assemblywoman who was unseated in a 2016 rematch with Democrat Sharon Quirk-Silva.” [Los Angeles Times, 1/9/18]

2014: Royce Recruited Kim To Run For Assembly

Orange County Register: Royce And GOP Chairman Scott Baugh Recruited Kim To Run. “Baugh and Rep. Ed Royce, R-Fullerton, recruited Kim to run, and Baugh hosted Steel's first fund raiser.” [Orange County Register, 11/30/14]

Catherine Kim

NOTE: No known familial relation found to exist between Young and Catherine Kim. Further research needed to confirm.

Catherine Kim Owned 1234 Starbuck St, Fullerton, CA, A Property Which Young Kim Rented To Run For Assembly, Until 2017

2013: Catherine Kim Made Campaign Contributions To Young Kim’s Campaign Via Bestland, LLC, A Business Solely Managed By Her

Catherine Kim Listed Herself As The Sole Manager Of Bestland, LLC

Bestland LLC Listed Its DBA As “Howard Johnson Hotel & Conference Center” Under Its Contributor Name. [California Secretary of State, 6/5/13]

June 2013: Bestland, LLC, A Business Managed Solely By Catherine Kim, Contributed $8,200 To Kim’s Campaign

June 2013: Bestland, LLC, Contributed $8,200 To Kim’s Campaign. [California Secretary of State, Contributions Search, 6/5/13]

August 2013: Kim’s Campaign Paid Bestland, LLC, $13,600 For A Fundraising Event

August 2013: Kim’s Campaign Paid Bestland, LLC, $13,600 For A Fundraising Event. [California Secretary of State, Kim For State Assembly 2014 – Expenditures Made, 9/3/13]

2011: Bestland, LLC, Made Five Contributions Totaling $5,000 To iCAN PAC, An Organization That Listed Charles Kim As Its President

2011: Bestland, LLC, Contributed $5,000 To iCAN PAC, A PAC That Only Received $6,100 In Total Contributions From All Donors

2011: Bestland, LLC, Made Five Contributions Totaling $5,000 To iCAN PAC. [California Secretary of State, Contributions Search, 2/19/11; 3/24/11; 4/29/11; 6/1/11; 6/30/11]

iCAN PAC Received A Total Of $6,100 In Contributions From All Donors. [California Secretary of State, Contributions Search, accessed 3/1/18]

Charles Kim Was Listed As The President Of The Inter-Community Action Network (iCAN)

The Orange County Community Election Working Group Listed Charles Kim As President Of The Inter- Community Action Network (iCAN). [Orange County Registrar of Voters, CEW Members, accessed 2/16/18]

Charles Kim Served As President Of The Inter-Community Network (iCAN), Which Aimed To Promote Civic Relations Between Local Government And The Korean Community. “‘The main factor in buying their homes was education, followed by affordable housing,’ said Charles Kim, the President of Inter-Community Network, a non-profit based in La Habra that aims to promote civic relations between local government and the Korean community. Kim also helped start the Korean American Coalition in 1983 and the now-defunct Black- Korean Alliance in Los Angeles.” [FullertonStories.com, 4/28/12]

State Of California: iCAN Was Not A Registered Business Or Charity iCAN Did Not Appear On A California Business Search. [California Secretary of State, Business Search, accessed 2/15/18] iCAN Did Not Appear As A Registered Organization On A California Charity Search. [California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General – Registry of Charitable Trusts, accessed 3/1/18]

Kim Registered Her Fictitious Business Name At A Property Owned By Catherine Kim

December 3, 2013: Kim Registered Y.K. Connections As Her Fictitious Business Name In Orange County. [Orange County Clerk-Recorder, Fictitious Business Name search, accessed 2/28/18]

Kim Registered Y.K. Connections At 1234 Starbuck St., Fullerton, CA, Owned By Her Campaign Donor – Catherine Kim. [Orange County Clerk-Recorder, Fictitious Business Name search, accessed 2/28/18]

Koch Brothers

Kim Accepted $6,200 From Koch Industries, Inc.

2015: Kim Accepted $6,200 From Koch Industries, Inc. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

NOTE: Update needed to identify any Congressional contributions received from entities related to the Koch Brothers.

38 Donald Trump

Significant Findings

 In 2018, Kim said she would “talk to her consultants” about whether to campaign with Trump.

 In 2016, Kim did not involve herself in the presidential race.

 In 2016, Kim’s opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, released a campaign ad comparing Young Kim to Donald Trump.

 In 2016, Kim’s opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, used Donald Trump in an attempt to pressure Kim into releasing her tax returns.

 In 2016, Kim outperformed Trump by 10 points but still lost in her district.

2018 Congressional Campaign

2018: Kim Said She Would “Talk To Her Consultants” About Whether To Campaign With Trump

2018: Kim Said Should Would “Talk To [Her] Consultants” About Whether To Campaign With Trump. “Young Kim, the congressional candidate Ed Royce (R-Calif.) endorsed for the seat he ducked out of trying to defend, said she hadn’t considered the possibility that Trump might campaign for her. ‘I’m going to talk to my consultants,’ she said. ‘That’s not an issue that I’m considering.’” [Politico, 1/30/18]

2016 Presidential Election

2016: Kim Did Not Involve Herself In The Presidential Campaign

2016: Kim Did Not Involve Herself In The Presidential Campaign. “‘She is not involving herself in the presidential campaign, so will have no comment,’ emailed her consultant, Dave Gilliard.” [Orange County Register, 8/22/16]

HEADLINE: 2 GOP Candidates Steer Clear Of Trump. [Orange County Register, 8/22/16]

HEADLINE: California Republican Lawmakers’ Presidential Pick: “I Don’t Know.” [Sacramento Bee, 1/5/16]

2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Released A Campaign Ad Comparing Young Kim To Donald Trump

39 2016: Kim’s Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Used Donald Trump In An Attempt To Pressure Kim Into Releasing Her Tax Returns

2016: Sharon Quirk-Silva Used Donald Trump In An Attempt To Pressure Kim Into Releasing Her Tax Returns. “‘Yesterday marked 100 days since Sharon released five years of her taxes and called on Kim to do the same, under the idea that confidence in government depends on some level of confidence in our leaders,’ writes Matt Reilly, Quirk-Silva’s campaign spokesman, in an email last week. ‘Like Trump, she has repeatedly refused. For Trump, it likely is about private dealings that paint him in a horrible light. For Kim, who has been in government for the past five tax years, this should be easy—what’s to hide if you work as a congressional aide, do campaign work on the side, or collect an Assembly paycheck?’” [Orange County Weekly, 8/1/16]

2018: Kim Displayed Her Income Tax Return On Her Campaign Website. “Kim had been running for Orange County supervisor, but seamlessly transformed her website to declare Kim for Congress. Unlike our foul-mouthed president, Kim displayed her income tax return for the world to see on her website.” [Sacramento Bee, 1/14/18]

2016: Kim Outperformed Trump By About 10 Percentage Points But Still Lost In Her District

Sacramento Bee: Kim Lost With 46.9 Percent Of The Vote, About 10 Percentage Points Better Than Trump’s Vote Share. “The district of Assemblywoman Young Kim, R-Fullerton, has GOP registration almost three percentage points higher than Baker’s. Kim also lost, with 46.9 percent of the vote, about 10 percentage points better than Trump’s vote share, based on unofficial results. Assemblyman Eric Linder, R-Corona, lost.” [Sacramento Bee, 11/23/16]

Issues

41 Agriculture

Items of Interest

 Kim voted against requiring overtime for agricultural workers.

Overtime

Kim Voted Against Requiring Overtime For Agricultural Workers

Kim Voted Against Requiring Overtime For Agricultural Workers. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Remov[ing] he exemption for agricultural employees regarding hours, meal breaks, and other working conditions, including specified wage requirements, and would create a schedule that would phase in overtime requirements for agricultural workers, as defined, over the course of 4 years, from 2019 to 2022, inclusive. Beginning January 1, 2022, the bill would require any work performed by a person, employed in an agricultural occupation, in excess of 12 hours in one day to be compensated at the rate of no less than twice the employee’s regular rate of pay.” The bill failed in the Assembly 38 to 35, with 7 not voting. [AB 2757, failed in the Assembly, 6/2/16]

42 Budget

Significant Findings

 Kim voted against a budget bill that repealed caps on welfare payments, included higher education funding, raised rates for child care providers, and increased rainy-day reserve funds.

State Funding

Kim Voted Against A Budget Bill That Repealed Caps On Welfare Payments, Included Higher Education Funding, Raised Rates For Child Care Providers, And Increased Rainy-Day Funds

Kim Voted Against A Budget Bill That Repealed A Cap On Welfare Payments, Included Money For Higher Education, Raised Rates For Child Care Providers, And Put An Additional $3 Billion Into The Rainy-Day Reserve. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “[A] $122.5 billion package repeals a controversial cap on welfare payments, includes more money for higher education, raises rates for child care providers and puts an additional $3 billion into the state’s rainy-day reserve, including an optional $2 billion shift demanded by Gov. Jerry Brown to protect against a feared economic downturn.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 52 to 27, with one not voting, and the bill became law. [SB 826, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 6/15/16; became law, 6/27/16; Sacramento Bee, 6/15/16]

43 Civil Rights & Liberties

Significant Findings

 Kim voted against prohibiting grand juries from investigating claims of excessive force by police officers that resulted in the death of a person.

 Kim voted to require law enforcement agencies to develop body-worn camera policies.

 Kim voted against authorizing a law enforcement agency to privately review footage from a body-worn camera after incidents involving great bodily harm or death.

 Kim voted to require a public safety officer be provided three days’ notice before the public release of body camera recordings.

 Kim did not vote on requiring government entities to obtain a warrant before accessing data on an electronic device.

 Kim voted against limiting police officers’ ability to confiscate property from individuals involved in criminal investigations until a conviction had been obtained.

 Kim voted against the Racial and Identity Profiling Act, which revised the definition of “racial profiling” and require the investigation of law enforcement agencies’ profiling practices.

 Kim voted against authorizing a court to inform the state bar if a prosecuting attorney deliberately withheld relevant evidence in violation of law.

 Kim did not vote on granting individuals no longer imprisoned to motion for their conviction to be vacated if it was based on a prejudicial error.

 Kim voted against requiring large contractors submit a nondiscrimination program to the state.

 Kim voted against requiring certain state institutions to disaggregate demographic information for Native Hawaiian, Asian, and Pacific Islander groups.

 Kim voted against requiring the attorney general to include a statement on a ballot initiative if its passage would likely result in the violation of one’s constitutional rights.

 Kim voted against requiring the Department of Industrial Relations to provide certain notices in more languages than English and Spanish.

 Kim voted to rename schools and buildings with names associated with the Confederate State of America.

Law Enforcement

Grand Jury Investigations

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Grand Juries From Investigating Claims Of Excessive Force By Police Officers That Resulted In The Death Of A Person

Kim Voted Against A Bill Prohibiting Grand Juries From Investigating Claims Of Excessive Force By Peace Officers In Cases That Led To The Death Of A Person. Kim voted for: “Prohibit[ing] a grand jury from inquiring into an offense or misconduct that involves a shooting or use of excessive force by a peace officer, as specified, that led to the death of a person being detained or arrested by the peace officer, unless the offense was 44 declared to the grand jury by one of its members.” The bill passed the Assembly 41 to 33, with 6 not voting, and became law. [SB 227, passed the Assembly, 7/16/15; became law, 8/11/15]

Sacramento Bee: SB 227 Was Authored In Response To Distrust Of The Grand Jury Process Following The Deaths Of Unarmed Black Men In Other States. “Gov. Jerry Brown has signed legislation prohibiting the use of grand juries in California in cases where police officers use lethal force, a response to distrust of the grand jury process following the deaths of unarmed black men in other states. Proponents of Senate Bill 227 argued the grand jury process is too secretive and allowed prosecutors to avoid decision-making responsibility in politically charged cases.” [Sacramento Bee, 8/11/15]

Body Camera Recordings

Kim Voted To Require Law Enforcement Agencies To Develop Body-Worn Camera Policies

Kim Voted To Require Law Enforcement Agencies To Develop Body-Worn Camera Policies. In June 2016, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] a law enforcement agency, department, or entity, if it employs peace officers and uses body-worn cameras for those officers, to develop a body-worn camera policy. The bill would require the policy to allow a peace officer to review his or her body-worn camera video and audio recordings before making a report, giving an internal affairs statement, or before any criminal or civil proceeding.” The bill passed the Assembly 71 to 7, with 2 not voting, but failed to pass a Senate Public Safety committee vote. [AB 1940, passed the Assembly, 6/2/16; failed in Senate committee, 6/28/16]

Kim Voted Against Authorizing A Law Enforcement Agency To Privately Review Footage From A Body- Worn Camera After Incidents Involving Great Bodily Harm Or Death

Kim Voted Against Authorizing A Law Enforcement Agency To Privately Review The Footage From A Body-Worn Camera When An Officer Is Involved In An Incident That Results In Great Bodily Injury Or Death Of A Person. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Authoriz[ing] the governing board of a law enforcement agency, in closed session, to review the footage from a body-worn camera when a peace officer who was wearing the camera is involved in in, or was a witness to, an incident that results in great bodily injury to, or death of, a person other than the peace officer.” The bill failed the Assembly 28 to 36, with 16 not voting. [AB 1957, failed in the Assembly, 6/1/16]

Kim Voted To Require A Public Safety Officer Be Provided Three Days’ Notice Before The Public Release Of Body Camera Recordings

Kim Voted For A Bill That Would Require A Public Safety Officer Be Provided Three Days’ Notice Before The Public Release Of Any Body Camera Recordings. In May 2016, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] a public safety officer to be provided a minimum of 3 business days’ notice before a public safety department or other public agency releases on the Internet any audio or video of the officer recorded by the officer.” The bill passed the Assembly 71 to 1, with 8 not voting, but failed a vote in the Senate Public Safety committee. [AB 2533, passed the Assembly, 5/19/16; failed in Senate committee, 6/28/16]

Search And Seizure

Kim Did Not Vote On Requiring Government Entities To Obtain A Warrant Before Accessing Data On An Electronic Device

Kim Did Not Vote On A Bill Requiring Government Entities To Obtain A Warrant Before Accessing Data On An Electronic Device. In September 2015, Kim did not vote on a bill to: “Prohibit government entity from compelling the production of or access to electronic communication information or electronic device information, as defined, without a search warrant, wiretap order, order for electronic reader records, or subpoena issued pursuant

45 under specified conditions, except for emergency situations, as defined.” The bill passed the Assembly 57 to 13, with 10 not voting, and became law. [SB 178, passed the Assembly 9/9/15; became law, 10/8/15]

Kim Voted Against Limiting Police Officers’ Ability To Confiscate Property From Individuals Involved In Criminal Investigations Until A Conviction Was Obtained

Kim Voted Against Limiting Police Officers’ Ability To Confiscate Property From Individuals Involved In Criminal Investigations Until A Conviction Had Been Obtained. In September 2015, Kim voted for: “Prohibit[ing] state or local law enforcement agencies from transferring seized property to a federal agency seeking adoption by the federal agency of the seized property. The bill would further prohibit state or local agencies from receiving an equitable share from a federal agency of specified seized property if a conviction for the underlying offenses is not obtained, except as specified. The bill would require notices of a forfeiture action to contain additional details, such as the rights of an interested party at a forfeiture hearing.” The bill failed in the Assembly 24 to 44, with 12 not voting. [SB 443, failed in the Assembly, 9/10/15]

Racial Profiling

Kim Voted Against The Racial And Identity Profiling Act, Which Revised The Definition Of “Racial Profiling” And Require The Investigation Of Law Enforcement Agencies’ Profiling Practices

Kim Voted Against The Racial And Identity Profiling Act, Which Revised The Definition Of “Racial Profiling” And Require The Investigation Of Law Enforcement Agencies’ Profiling Policies And Practices. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Enact[ing] he Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015, which would, among other changes, revise the definition of racial profiling to instead refer to racial or identity profiling, and make a conforming change to the prohibition against peace officers engaging in that practice. […] The bill would require the board [the Racial and Identity Profiling Board], among other duties, to investigate and analyze state and local law enforcement agencies’ racial and identity profiling policies and practices across geographic areas in California, to annually make publicly available its findings and policy recommendations, to hold public meetings annually, as specified, and to issue the board’s first annual report no later than January 1, 2018.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 43 to 30, with 7 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 953, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/10/15; became law, 10/3/15]

Court Issues

Kim Voted Against Authorizing A Court To Inform The State Bar If A Prosecuting Attorney Deliberately Withheld Relevant Evidence In Violation Of Law

Kim Voted Against Authorizing A Court To Inform The State Bar If A Prosecuting Attorney Deliberately Withheld Relevant Evidence In Violation Of Law. In June and September 2015, Kim voted against: “Authoriz[ing] a court, upon receiving information that the prosecuting attorney has deliberately and intentionally withheld relevant or material exculpatory evidence or information in violation of law, to make a finding, supported by clear and convincing evidence, that a violation occurred. If the court makes such a finding, the bill would require the court to inform the State Bar of California of that violation if the prosecuting attorney acted in bad faith and the impact of the withholding contributed to a guilty verdict, guilty or nolo contendere plea, or, if identified before conclusion of trial, seriously limited the ability of a defendant to present a defense.” The bill passed the Assembly 41 to 36, with 3 not voting, and the Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 47 to 26, with 7 not voting. The bill became law. [AB 1328, passed the Assembly, 6/1/15; Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; became law, 10/3/15]

Kim Did Not Vote On Granting Ex-Convicts The Right To Motion For Their Conviction To Be Vacated If It Was Based On A Prejudicial Error

46 Kim Did Not Vote On Creating An Explicit Right For A Person No Longer Imprisoned To Prosecute A Motion To Vacate A Conviction Based On A Prejudicial Error. In May 2015, Kim did not vote on a bill to: “Create an explicit right for a person no longer imprisoned or restrained to prosecute a motion to vacate a conviction or sentence based on a prejudicial error damaging the moving party’s ability to meaningfully understand, defend against, or knowingly accept the actual or potential adverse immigration consequences of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere, or based on newly discovered evidence of actual innocence, as specified.” The bill passed the Assembly 65 to 11, with 4 not voting, and the Assembly concurred with Senate amendments. [AB 813, passed the Assembly, 5/18/15]

August 29, 2016: Kim Did Not Vote To Concur With Senate Amendments For AB 813. On August 29, 2016, Kim did not vote to concur with Senate amendments for AB 813. The bill passed the Assembly 59 to 14, with 7 not voting. [AB 813, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/29/16]

August 31, 2016: Kim Did Not Vote To Concur With Senate Amendments For AB 813. On August 31, 2016, Kim did not vote to concur with Senate amendments for AB 813. The bill passed 61 to 15, with 4 not voting, and became law. [AB 813, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/31/16; became law, 9/28/16]

Discrimination

Kim Voted Against Requiring Large Contractors Submit A Nondiscrimination Program To The State

Kim Voted Against Requiring Contractors With Over 100 Employees To Submit A Nondiscrimination Program To The State. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] an employer with 100 or more employees in state, as specified, and a contract of 30 days or more, prior to becoming a contractor or subcontractor with the state, to submit a nondiscrimination program to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and to submit periodic reports no more than annually of its compliance with that program.” The bill passed the Assembly 55 to 23, with 2 not voting, but was vetoed by the Governor. [AB 1354, passed the Assembly, 6/3/15; vetoed by the Governor, 10/11/15]

Demographics

Kim Voted Against Requiring Certain State Institutions To Disaggregate Demographic Information For Native Hawaiian, Asian, And Pacific Islander Groups

Kim Voted Against Requiring Five State Institutions To Disaggregate Demographic Information For Native Hawaiian, Asian, And Pacific Islander Groups. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “[A bill] requir[ing] the California Community Colleges (CCC) Board of Governors (BOG), the California State University (CSU) Trustees, California Department of Public Health (DPH), and California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), and requests the University of California (UC) Regents, to disaggregate demographic information for Native Hawaiian, Asian, and Pacific Islander (API) groups.” The bill passed the Assembly 54 to 22, with 4 not voting. [AB 1726, Assembly third reading, 5/31/16; passed the Assembly, 6/2/16]

Kim Voted To Concur With The Final Version Of The Law, Which Required The State Department Of Public Health To Use Additional Categories For Specified Asian And Pacific Islander Groups Under Certain Circumstances. In August 2016, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] the updating of the reporting categories for future decennial censuses. The bill would require the State Department of Public Health to use the additional separate collection categories and other tabulations for specified Asian groups and Pacific Islander groups, and to take additional actions as specified above, under certain circumstances.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 75 to 1, with 4 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1726, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/29/16; became law, 9/25/16]

Ballot Initiatives

Kim Voted Against Requiring The Attorney General To Include A Statement On A Ballot Initiative Identifying It As Unconstitutional

Kim Voted Against Requiring The Attorney General To Include A Statement On A Ballot Initiative If It Likely Violates An Individual’s Constitutional Rights. In May 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the Attorney General, if he or she determines during preparation of the circulating title and summary for a statewide initiative measure that the measure would likely result in a violation of an individual’s constitutional rights, to include a specified statement in the title and summary.” The bill passed the Assembly 50 to 26, with 4 not voting. [AB 884, passed the Assembly, 5/26/15]

Kim Voted For The Final Version Of The Law, Which Removed Any Provisions Regarding Ballot Initiatives. In August 2016, Kim voted to concur with Senate amendments – which completely removed provisions requiring the Attorney General to identify ballot initiatives likely resulting in a violation of one’s constitutional rights and instead focused on the public use of Assembly television signals – a vote that passed unanimously. The bill became public law. [AB 884, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/30/16; became law, 9/22/16]

Accessibility

Kim Voted Against Requiring The Department Of Industrial Relations To Provide Certain Notices In More Languages Than English And Spanish

Kim Voted Against A Bill Requiring The Department Of Industrial Relations To Provide Notices In More Languages Than English And Spanish. In May 2015, Kim voted against: “Expands the obligation of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the Division of Workers' Compensation (DWC) to provide certain notices in more languages than English and Spanish.” The bill passed the Assembly 64 to 11, with 5 not voting. [AB 438, Assembly third reading, 4/6/15; passed the Assembly, 5/14/15]

Kim Voted For The Final Version Of The Law, Which Required The Department Of Industrial Relations To Provide Forms In Tagalog, Chinese, Vietnamese, And Korean. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the Department of Industrial Relations and the Division of Workers’ Compensation to make specified forms, notices, and fact sheets available in Chinese, Tagalog, Korean, and Vietnamese.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 78 to 0, with 2 not voting, and became law. [AB 438, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/10/15; became law, 10/6/15]

Confederate Symbols

Kim Voted To Rename Schools Or Buildings With Names Associated With The Confederate States Of America

Kim Voted To Rename Any Public Schools Or Buildings With Names Associated With People From The Confederate States Of America. In August 2015, Kim voted for: “Prohibit[ing] he use of an elected leader or senior military officer of the Confederate States of America to name state or local property. The bill would require a name associated with the Confederate States of America used to name state or local property prior to January 1, 2017, to be changed and any sign associated with the name to be removed.” The bill passed the Assembly 64 to 11, with 5 not voting, but was vetoed by the Governor. [SB 539, passed the Assembly, 8/31/15; vetoed by the Governor, 10/11/15]

48 Consumer Issues

Significant Findings

 Kim voted against prohibiting electrical or gas corporations from using ratepayer funds to grant executive bonuses after having ratepayers incur financial responsibility for a safety violation.

 Kim voted against requiring the state to fund a low-income water assistance program.

 Kim voted against requiring cleaning product manufacturers to disclose ingredients.

Ratepayer Protections

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Electrical Or Gas Corporations From Using Ratepayer Funds To Grant Executive Bonuses After Having Ratepayers Cover A Safety Violation

Kim Voted Against A Bill Prohibiting An Electrical Or Gas Corporation Using Ratepayer Funds To Pay Excess Compensation To An Executive For Five Years Following A Triggering Event. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] n electrical corporation or gas corporation from recovering from ratepayers expenses for excess compensation, as defined, paid to an officer of the utility for a period of 5 years following a triggering event, as defined, unless the utility obtains the approval of the commission. The bill would provide that anytime within a 5-year period following a triggering event, and prior to paying or seeking recovery of excess compensation, the electrical corporation or gas corporation would be required to file an application with the commission containing specified information.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 48 to 30, with 2 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1266, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; became law, 10/8/15]

AB 1266 Defined A “Triggering Event” As A Violation Of Federal Or State Safety Regulations That, As A Proximate Cause, Forces Ratepayers To Incur A Financial Responsibility In Excess Of $5 Million. “A ‘triggering event’ occurs if, after January 1, 2013, an electrical corporation or gas corporation violates a federal or state safety regulation with respect to the plant and facility of the utility and, as a proximate cause of that violation, ratepayers incur a financial responsibility in excess of five million dollars ($5,000,000).” [AB 1266, Chaptered Text, 10/8/15]

Utility Rates

Kim Voted Against Requiring The State Resource Control Board To Fund A Low-Income Water Assistance Program

Kim Voted Against A Bill Requiring The State Water Resources Control Board To Fund A Low-Income Water Assistance Program. Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the state board, no later than January 1, 2018, in collaboration with the State Board of Equalization and relevant stakeholders, to develop a plan for the funding and implementation of the Low-Income Water Rate Assistance Program, which would include specified elements. The bill would permit the board to consider existing rate assistance programs authorized by the commission in developing the plan and would authorize the plan to include recommendations for other cost-effective methods of offering assistance to low-income water customers.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 55 to 24, with one not voting, and became law. [AB 401, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/9/15; became law, 10/9/15]

49 Manufacturing

Kim Voted Against Requiring Cleaning Product Manufacturers To Disclose Ingredients

Kim Voted Against Requiring Cleaning Product Manufacturers To Disclose Ingredients. In January 2016, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the manufacturer of cleaning products for retail sale in this state to disclose each ingredient contained in the product.” The bill failed in the Assembly 33 to 28, with 18 not voting. [AB 708, failed in the Assembly, 1/28/16]

50 Crime & Public Safety

Items of Interest

 Kim voted against clarifying the definition of “sexual assault” for the purposes of reporting abuse.

 Kim voted for allowing prosecuting agencies to petition for the forfeiture of illegal assets exceeding $100,000 obtained from criminal profiteering activities.

Sexual Violence

Kim Voted Against Clarifying The Definition Of “Sexual Assault” For The Purposes Of Reporting Abuse

Kim Voted Against Clarifying The Definition Of “Sexual Assault” For The Purposes Of Reporting Abuse. In May 2015, Kim voted against: “Provid[ing] that ‘sexual assault’ for these purposes does not include voluntary sodomy, oral copulation, or sexual penetration, if there are no indicators of abuse, unless that conduct is between a person who is 21 years of age or older and a minor who is under 16 years of age.” The bill failed in the Assembly 27 to 32, with 21 not voting. [AB 832, failed in the Assembly, 5/14/15]

Forfeiture Of Assets

Kim Voted To Allow Prosecuting Agencies To Petition For The Forfeiture Of Illegal Assets Exceeding $100,000 Obtained From Criminal Profiteering Activities

Kim Voted To Allow Prosecuting Agencies To Petition For Forfeiture Of Assets Obtained From Suspected Criminal Profiteering Activities, If The Assets Exceed $100,000. In May 2015, Kim voted for: “Allow[ing] the prosecuting agency to file a petition of forfeiture prior to the commencement of the underlying criminal proceeding if the value of the assets seized exceeds $100,000, there is a substantial probability that the prosecuting agency will file a criminal complaint, there is a substantial probability the prosecuting agency will prevail on the issue of forfeiture and failure to enter the order will result in the property being destroyed or otherwise removed from the jurisdiction of the court, the need to preserve the property outweighs the hardship on any party against whom the order is entered, and there is a substantial probability that the assets subject to forfeiture represent direct or indirect proceeds of criminal activity committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with, a transnational criminal organization, as defined.” The bill passed the Assembly 71 to 5, with 4 not voting, but, in the latest action, was held in Senate committee without further action. [AB 443, passed the Assembly, 5/28/15]

51 Economy & Jobs

Items of Interest

 Kim voted to give loans to small business complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Small Businesses

Kim Voted To Give Loans To Small Business Complying With The Americans With Disabilities Act

Kim Voted To Give Loans To Small Business Complying With The Americans With Disabilities Act. In June 2015, Kim voted for: “Establish[ing] the California Americans with Disabilities Act Small Business Capital Access Loan Program within the Capital Access Loan Program, to create a self-sustaining program to provide loans to assist small businesses in financing the costs of projects that alter or retrofit existing small business facilities, meeting specified criteria, to comply with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.” The bill passed the Assembly 77 to 1, with 2 not voting, and became law. [AB 1230, passed the Assembly, 6/2/15; became law, 10/11/15]

52 Education Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim voted to provide resources to students and parents who have been subjected to school-based discrimination based on actual or perceived religious affiliation, nationality, race, or ethnicity.

 Kim did not vote to expand a community colleges’ authority to deny enrollment to students expelled from other schools for sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, or stalking.

 Kim voted for the final version of the bill that would have removed the schools’ authority to deny enrollment and instead required state universities to publish data relating to sexual violence on campus.

 Kim voted against expressing legislative intent to provide all low-income children access to state-funded preschool programs.

 Kim voted against requiring children entering first grade to have completed one year of kindergarten.

 Kim authored a bill that would freeze tuition at certain state universities while Proposition 30, which increased taxes to fund state schools, was in effect.

 Kim voted against requiring all students in grades 7 to 12 receive a comprehensive sexual health and HIV prevention education.

 Kim voted against establishing a grant directed at schools with students demonstrating financial need and high truancy rates.

 Kim voted for the final version of the law, which established grant programs to reduce truancy and support students at risk of dropping out or become victims of crime.

 Kim authored a resolution that would call on Harvard University to end its focus on student applicants’ race in the enrollment process.

 Kim voted to require oversight into the development of a curricula to ensure quality courses in ethnic studies.

 Kim voted to expand social studies education to include unlawful deportation throughout U.S. history.

 Kim voted against expressing legislative intent that schools provide pupils with adequate time to eat lunch during the school day.

 Kim voted against requiring online universities to register with the state and participate in the Student Tuition Recovery Fund.

 Kim voted against lowering the amount of unmet financial need a student needed to demonstrate in order to qualify for an enrollment fee waiver at California community colleges.

Student Discrimination

53 Kim Voted To Provide Resources To Students And Parents Who Have Been Subjected To School- Based Discrimination

Kim Voted To Provide Statewide Resources To Students And Their Families Who Have Been Subjected To School-Based Discrimination Based On Actual Or Perceived Religious Affiliation, Nationality, Race, Or Ethnicity. In August 2016, Kim voted for: “Provid[ing] […] statewide resources, including community-based organizations, that provide support to youth, and their families, who have been subjected to school-based discrimination, harassment, intimidation, or bullying on the basis of religious affiliation, nationality, race, or ethnicity, or perceived religious affiliation, nationality, race, or ethnicity.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 79 to 0, with one not voting, and the Governor approved the bill. [AB 2845, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/24/16; became law, 9/25/16]

Campus Sexual Assault

Kim Did Not Vote To Expand A Community Colleges’ Authority To Deny Enrollment To Students Expelled From Other Schools For Sexual Violence…

Kim Did Not Vote To Expand A Community Colleges’ Authority To Deny, Permit, Or Offer Conditional Enrollment To Individuals Expelled From Other Schools For Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Or Stalking. In May 2015, Kim did not vote on: “[A bill to] expand the authorization to either deny enrollment, permit enrollment, or permit conditional the authorization to either deny enrollment, permit enrollment, or permit conditional certain offenses or for a violation of a district’s adopted policies concerning sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking described above. The bill would also authorize a community college district to require a student seeking admission to inform the community college district considering admitting the student if he or she has been previously expelled or is currently suspended from a community college in the state for a violation of that community college’s district-adopted policies concerning sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking.” The bill passed the Assembly 59 to 11, with 10 not voting. [AB 969, passed the Assembly, 5/18/15]

…But Kim Voted For The Final Version Of The Bill, Which Excluded Enrollment Authority Granted In Previous Versions But Required State Universities To Publish Data Relating To Sexual Violence

Kim Voted For A Final Version Of The Bill, Which Would Have Excluded Enrollment Authority Granted In Previous Versions But Require State Institutions Of Higher Education To Publish Data Relating To Cases Involving Sexual Violence Online. In August 2015, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing], until January 1, 2022, in order to receive state funds for student financial assistance, the governing board of each community college district, the Trustees of the California State University, the Regents of the University of California, and the governing board of each independent postsecondary institution to report, on or before October 1, 2018, and on an annual basis thereafter, specified data relating to cases of alleged sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking. The bill would require that report to be posted on the respective institution’s Internet Web site in a manner easily accessible to students.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 79 to 0, with one not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 969, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/22/16; vetoed by Governor, 9/30/16]

Early Childhood Education

Kim Voted Against Expressing Legislative Intent To Provide All Low-Income Children Access To A State-Funded Preschool Program

Kim Voted Against Expressing Legislative Intent To Provide All Low-Income Children Access To A State- Funded Preschool Program. Kim voted against: “Establish[ing] the Preschool for All Act of 2015 and requires, 54 on or before January 1, 2017, all eligible children to have access to the state preschool program the year before they enter kindergarten, if their parents wish to enroll them, contingent upon the appropriation of sufficient funding in the annual Budget Act for this purpose. […] Further expresses the intent of the Legislature that all low-income children have access to either a state preschool program or a transitional kindergarten program and to provide funds to expand the state preschool program to provide full day, full year preschool for all eligible low-income children.” The bill passed the Assembly 56 to 22, with 2 not voting. [AB 47, Assembly Floor Analysis, 6/2/15; passed the Assembly, 6/3/15]

Kim Changed Her Position And Voted For The Final Version Of The Bill, Which Would Have Excluded The Low-Income Students Access Provision. “Requir[ing], on or before June 30, 2018, all eligible children who are not enrolled in transitional kindergarten to have access to the state preschool program the year before they enter kindergarten, if their parents wish to enroll them, contingent upon the appropriation of sufficient funding in the annual Budget Act for this purpose.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 47, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/9/15]

Kim Voted Against Requiring Children Entering First Grade To Have Completed One Year Of Kindergarten

Kim Voted Against Requiring Children Entering First Grade To Have Completed One Year Of Kindergarten. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] a child to have completed one year of kindergarten before he or she may be admitted to the first grade, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.” The bill passed the Assembly 58 to 21, with one not voting, but in the latest action, the Senate Appropriation committee placed the bill on suspense file. [AB 713, passed the Assembly, 6/3/15]

State Funding

Kim Authored A Bill That Would Freeze Tuition At CSU Campuses And Community Colleges While Proposition 30, Which Increased Taxes To Fund State Schools, Was In Effect

2015: Kim Authored A Bill That Would Freeze Tuition At CSU Campuses And Community Colleges While Proposition 30 Was In Effect. “This bill, commencing with the 2015–16 fiscal year, would prohibit the imposition of a student success fee at a campus of a segment of public postsecondary education unless the student success fee is approved by a favorable vote of a majority of those students voting at an election of the student body held at that campus within the preceding 48 months.” In the latest action, the bill’s hearing in committee was canceled at Kim’s request. [AB 42, Authored, 3/16/15]

Proposition 30 Increased Personal And Sales Tax Rates To Provide Revenue For Public Elementary And Secondary Schools And Community Colleges. “Proposition 30, known as the Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012, was approved by the voters at the November 6, 2012, statewide general election and, among other things, increases personal income tax and sales and use tax rates and provides revenue for public elementary and secondary schools and community colleges.” [AB 42, Amended Assembly Text, 3/16/15]

Sexual Education

Kim Voted Against Requiring All Students Receive A Comprehensive Sexual Health And HIV Prevention Education

Kim Voted Against Requiring All Students Receive A Comprehensive Sexual Health And HIV Prevention Education. Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] school districts to ensure that all pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, receive comprehensive sexual health education and HIV prevention education, as specified. By imposing additional 55 requirements on school districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 51 to 26, with 3 not voting, and became law. [AB 329, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; became law, 10/1/15]

Truancy Prevention

Kim Voted Against Establishing A Grant Directed At Schools With Students Demonstrating Financial Need And High Truancy Rates…

Kim Voted Against Establishing A Grant Directed At Students Who Demonstrate Financial Need And Have High Truancy Rates. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Establish[ing] the Our Children’s Success–The Early Intervention Attendance Pilot Grant Program under the administration of the State Department of Education. The program would provide grants to applicant public schools, school districts, and county offices of education seeking to resolve the attendance problems of pupils in kindergarten and grades 1 to 3, inclusive. […] The bill would require the department to give priority in awarding grants to those applicants who demonstrate financial need for the grant and that have the highest truancy rates in urban areas, rural areas, and suburban areas, respectively.” The bill passed the Assembly 56 to 24. [AB 1014, passed the Assembly, 6/3/15]

…But Voted For The Final Law, Which Established Grant Programs To Reduce Truancy And Support Students At Risk Of Dropping Out Or Become Victims Of Crime

Kim Changed Her Position And Voted For The Final Version Of The Bill, Which Established And Implemented Grant Programs To Reduce Truancy And Support Students Who Are At Risk Of Dropping Out Of School Or Are Victims Of Crime. In August 2016, Kim voted for: “Establish[ing] the Learning Communities for School Success Program for the purpose of implementing that grant program [aimed at improving outcomes for public school pupils by reducing truancy and supporting pupils who are at risk of dropping out of school or are victims of crime], subject to an appropriation to the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund in the annual Budget Act or another statute for the purposes of the bill. The bill would specify the administrative duties and responsibilities of the department with respect to the program, including administering grants and coordinating assistance to local educational agencies, as defined. The bill would set forth criteria to guide the department in awarding grants under the program, and would specify the purposes for which grant funds may be used. The bill would require the department to submit a final evaluation of the program to the Legislature on or before January 31, 2020.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 62 to 16, with 2 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1014, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/24/16; became law, 9/21/16]

Affirmative Action

Kim Authored A Resolution That Would Call Upon Harvard University To End Its Focus On Student Applicants’ Race In The Enrollment Process

2015: Kim Authored A House Resolution That Would Have The Assembly Call Upon Harvard University To “End Its Focus On A Student Applicant’s Race In Its Student Enrollment Process.” “Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That the Assembly calls upon Harvard University to end its focus on a student applicant’s race in its student enrollment process and to instead consider the overall individual contribution of each student candidate in a manner that does not have the practical effect of capping the number of Asian American students enrolled in its institution.” The resolution was referred to the committee on higher education, where it was held without further action. [HR 17, Authored, 4/20/15; held in committee without further action, 11/30/16]

Social Studies

56 Kim Voted To Require Oversight Into The Development Of Curricula To Ensure Quality Courses In Ethnic Studies

Kim Voted To Require Oversight Into The Development Of Curricula To Ensure Quality Courses In Ethnic Studies. In September 2015, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] the Superintendent to oversee the development of, and the state board to adopt, a model curriculum to ensure quality courses in ethnic studies.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 61 to 15, with 4 not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 101, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/9/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/9/15]

Kim Voted To Expand Social Studies Education To Include Unlawful Deportation Throughout U.S. History

Kim Voted For Expansion Of Social Studies Education To Include Unlawful Deportation Throughout U.S. History. In September 2015, Kim voted for: “Encouraging the incorporation of survivor and witness testimony into the teaching of human rights, include the unconstitutional deportation to Mexico during the Great Depression of citizens and lawful permanent residents of the United States within the definition of human rights.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 62 to 10, with 8 not voting, and became law. [AB 146, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/4/15; became law, 10/1/5]

Student Lunches

Kim Voted Against Expressing Legislative Intent That Schools Provide Pupils With Adequate Time To Eat Lunch

Kim Voted Against A Bill That That Would Have Expressed Legislative Intent That Schools Provide Pupils With Adequate Time To Eat Lunch During The School Day. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Express[ing] legislative intent that schools provide pupils with adequate time to eat lunch during the schoolday. The bill would require school districts, in addition to providing a nutritionally adequate free or reduced-price meal for each needy pupil each schoolday, to ensure that each of the schools in their respective jurisdictions makes available to its pupils adequate time to eat after being served lunch.” The bill passed the Assembly 54 to 24, with 2 not voting, but the Senate Appropriations committee placed the bill on suspense file. [AB 292, passed the Assembly, 6/4/15]

Online Universities

Kim Voted Against Requiring Online Universities To Register With The State And Participate In The Student Tuition Recovery Fund

Kim Voted Against Requiring Postsecondary Educational Institutions With No Physical Presence In California To Register With The State And Participate In The Student Tuition Recovery Fund. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] a private entity with no physical presence in California, that would be subject to the requirements of this act if the entity was located in this state, to register with the bureau and participate in the act’s Student Tuition Recovery Fund for its California students.” The bill passed the Assembly 55 to 25 but, in the latest action, was held in Senate committee without further action. [AB 2652, passed the Assembly, 6/1/16]

The Student Tuition Recovery Fund Made Students Enrolled In A Defunct School 120 Days Before The School’s Closure Eligible For Tuition Reimbursement. “Student Tuition Recovery Fund - Students enrolled at the time of school closure (or within 120 days of the school's closure) may be eligible for reimbursement through the Student Tuition Recovery Fund (STRF). The STRF exists to relieve or mitigate economic losses suffered by a student in an educational program at a qualifying institution if the student was a California resident (or was enrolled in a residency program.)” [California Department of Consumer Affairs – Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education, Student Tuition Recovery Fund, accessed 2/20/18]

57 Fee Waivers

Kim Voted Against Lowering The Amount Of Unmet Financial Need A Student Needed To Demonstrate In Order To Qualify For A Fee Waiver At California Community Colleges

Kim Voted Against Lowering The Amount Of Unmet Financial Need A Student Needed To Demonstrate In Order To Qualify For A Fee Waiver At California Community Colleges To At Least One Dollar. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Lower[ing] the amount of unmet financial need a student needs to demonstrate to qualify for a fee waiver to at least one dollar. To the extent the bill would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program.” The bill passed the Assembly 53 to 25, with 2 not voting, but failed a Senate Education committee vote. [AB 1583, passed the Assembly, 6/2/16; failed in Senate committee, 6/29/16]

58 Election & Campaign Finance Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim voted against establishing a motor voter program that would automatically register individuals obtaining a driver’s license to vote.

 Kim voted against requiring the CSU and California Community College systems to implement a process allowing students to simultaneously enroll and register to vote.

 Kim voted against requiring the DMV to pilot and evaluate a process to ensure completed voter registration.

 Kim voted against permitting a vote-by-mail voter to return their ballot to the elections official from whom it came at a mail drop-off location.

 Kim voted against prohibiting an election official from rejecting an unsigned vote-by-mail ballot if the voter signs the ID envelope before the eighth day following the election.

 Kim voted against requiring the state to adopt regulations governing ballot on-demand systems.

 Kim voted against authorizing the state to revise the wording of the Voter Bill of Rights as necessary to ensure understanding.

 Kim voted against prohibiting a political subdivision from holding an election other than a statewide election date if such an election has led to lower voter turnout.

 Kim did not vote on a resolution urging SCOTUS to uphold the federal constitutional principle of “one person, one vote.”

Voter Registration

Kim Voted Against Establishing A Motor Voter Program That Would Automatically Register Individuals Obtaining A Driver’s License To Vote

Kim Voted Against Establishing A Motor Voter Program That Would Automatically Register Individuals Obtaining A Driver’s License To Vote. Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] he Secretary of State and the Department of Motor Vehicles to establish the California New Motor Voter Program for the purpose of increasing opportunities for voter registration by any person who is qualified to be a voter. Under the program, after the Secretary of State certifies that certain enumerated conditions are satisfied, the Department of Motor Vehicles would be required to electronically provide to the Secretary of State the records of each person who is issued an original or renewal of a driver’s license or state identification card or who provides the department with a change of address, as specified. The person’s motor vehicle records would then constitute a completed affidavit of registration and the person would be registered to vote, unless the person affirmatively declined to be registered to vote during a transaction with the department, the department did not represent to the Secretary of State that the person attested that he or she meets all voter eligibility requirements, as specified, or the Secretary of State determines that the person is ineligible to vote.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 52 to 26, with 2 not voting, and became law. [AB 1461, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; became law, 10/10/15]

59 Kim Voted Against Requiring The California State University And Community College Systems To Implement A Process Allowing Students To Simultaneously Enroll And Register To Vote

Kim Voted Against Requiring The California State University And California Community College Systems To Implement A Process Allowing Students To Simultaneously Enroll And Register To Vote. Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the California State University and the California Community Colleges to implement a process and the infrastructure to allow a person who enrolls online at the institution to submit an affidavit of voter registration electronically on the Internet Web site of the Secretary of State by July 1, 2018. The bill would encourage the University of California to comply with this provision.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 55 to 24, with one not voting, and became law. [AB 2455, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/24/16; became law, 9/21/16]

Kim Voted Against Requiring The DMV To Pilot And Evaluate A Process To Ensure Completed Voter Registration

Kim Voted Against Requiring The Department Of Motor Vehicles To Pilot And Evaluate A Process To Ensure Completed Voter Registration. In August 2016, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the Department of Motor Vehicles to pilot and evaluate a process to register voters pursuant to the program to assist persons who do not fully complete the voter registration process. The bill would require the department to report on October 15, 2016, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, on the outcome of the pilot, other process changes proposed to ensure the full completion of voter registration, and an evaluation of options for ensuring persons have the opportunity to fully complete the voter registration process, including adding information technology equipment or fully automating forms.” The bill passed the Assembly 49 to 28, with 3 not voting, and became law. [SB 838, passed the Assembly, 6/16/16; became law, 9/13/16]

Vote-By-Mail Ballots

Kim Voted Against Permitting A Vote-By-Mail Voter To Return Their Ballot To The Elections Official From Whom It Came At A Mail Drop-Off Location

Kim Voted Against Permitting A Vote-By-Mail Voter To Return Their Ballot To The Elections Official From Whom It Came At A Mail Drop-Off Location. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Permit[ing] vote by mail voter to return his or her voted vote by mail ballot to the elections official from whom it came at a vote by mail ballot drop-off location, as defined. The bill would require the Secretary of State, on or before January 1, 2017, to promulgate regulations establishing guidelines based on best practices for security measures and procedures that a county elections official may use if the county elections official establishes one or more vote by mail ballot drop-off locations and vote by mail ballot drop boxes, as defined.” The bill passed the Assembly and became law. [SB 365, passed the Assembly, 9/9/15; became law, 10/10/15]

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting An Election Official From Rejecting An Unsigned Vote-By-Mail Ballot If The Voter Signs The ID Envelope Before The Eighth Day Following The Election

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting An Election Official From Rejecting An Unsigned Vote By Mail Ballot If The Voter Signs The Identification Envelope Before The Eighth Day Following The Election. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] [an] elections official from rejecting the vote by mail ballot if the voter signs the identification envelope at the elections official’s office before 5 p.m. on the 8th day after the election, completes and submits an unsigned ballot statement, as specified, before 5 p.m. on the 8th day after the election, or completes and submits an unsigned ballot statement to a polling place within the county or a ballot dropoff box before the close of the polls on election day.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendment, and the bill became law. [AB 477, passed the Assembly, 9/10/15; became law, 10/10/15]

60 Ballots On-Demand

Kim Voted Against Requiring The State To Adopt Regulations Governing Ballot On-Demand Systems

Kim Voted Against Requiring The Secretary Of State To Adopt Regulations Governing And Certifying Ballot On-Demand Systems. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the secretary to adopt regulations (A) governing ballot on demand systems, as defined, and (B) for purposes of certifying ballot on demand systems. The bill, for commercial ballot manufacturers and finishers, would require the secretary to require a biennial inspection of the certified manufacturing, finishing, and storage facilities. The bill would also require the secretary to approve each ballot on demand system before the system is deployed for use in California elections. The bill would prohibit a jurisdiction from purchasing, leasing, or contracting for, and a vendor, company, or person from selling, leasing, or contracting with a jurisdiction for, a ballot on demand system unless the ballot on demand system has been certified by the secretary.” The bill passed the Assembly 54 to 23, with 3 not voting, and became law. [AB 439, passed the Assembly, 9/3/15; became law, 10/10/15]

Accessibility

Kim Voted Against Authorizing The State To Revise The Wording Of The Voter Bill Of Rights As Necessary To Ensure Understanding

Kim Voted Against A Bill Authorizing The Secretary Of State To Revise The Wording Of The Voter Bill Of Rights As Necessary To Ensure Understanding. In August 2015, Kim voted against: “Eliminat[ing] the requirement that the Voter Bill of Rights be worded as specified and would instead authorize the Secretary of State to revise the wording as necessary to ensure understanding.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 25, with 3 not voting, and became law. [SB 505, passed the Assembly, 8/17/15; became law, 9/1/15]

Voter Turnout

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting A Political Subdivision From Holding An Election Other Than On A Statewide Election Date If Such An Election Has Led To Lower Voter Turnout

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting A Political Subdivision From Holding An Election Other Than On A Statewide Election Date If Such An Election Has Led To Lower Voter Turnout. Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] a political subdivision, as defined, from holding an election other than on a statewide election date if holding an election on a nonconcurrent date has previously resulted in voter turnout for a regularly scheduled election in that political subdivision being at least 25% less than the average voter turnout within the political subdivision for the previous 4 statewide general elections, except as specified.” The bill passed the Assembly 45 to 30, with 5 not voting, and became law. [SB 415, passed the Assembly, 6/16/15; became law, 9/1/15]

One Person, One Vote

Kim Did Not Vote On A Resolution Urging SCOTUS To Uphold The Federal Constitutional Principle Of “One Person, One Vote”

Kim Did Not Vote On A Resolution Urging SCOTUS To Uphold The Federal Constitutional Principle Of “One Person, One Vote.” In August 2015, Kim did not vote on: “Urg[ing] the Supreme Court of the United States to uphold the federal constitutional principle of “one person, one vote” and not deny California’s children and immigrants equal protection under the law.” The resolution passed the Assembly 57 to 11, with 12 not voting. [SJR 13, passed the Assembly, 8/31/15]

61 Energy Issues

Items of Interest

 Between 2014 and 2016, Kim accepted $38,600 from energy companies.

 Between 2014 and 2016, Kim accepted $29,600 from oil companies and oil advocacy groups.

 Kim voted against requiring that the amount of electricity generated and sold from renewable energy resources be increased to 50 percent by 2031.

 Kim voted against prohibiting state retirement boards from making new retirement fund investments in thermal coal companies.

 Kim voted against requiring operators of oil well and drilling projects to monitor surrounding groundwater.

Energy Industry Campaign Cash

2014-2016: Kim Accepted At Least $38,600 From Energy Companies

2014-2016: Kim Accepted At Least $38,600 From Energy Companies, Including Sempra Energy And Koch Industries, Inc. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

2014-2015: Kim Accepted $8,000 From Sempra Energy. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

2015: Kim Accepted $6,200 From Koch Industries, Inc. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

2014-2016: Kim Accepted At Least $29,600 From Oil Companies & Oil Advocacy Groups, Including Chevron, Exxon Mobil, And Tesoro Companies

2014-2016: Kim Accepted At Least $29,600 From Oil Companies And Oil Advocacy Groups. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

2014-2016: Kim Accepted $10,200 From Tesoro Companies. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

2015: Kim Accepted $6,900 From Chevron Corporations And Its Subsidiaries/Affiliated. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

2014-2015: Kim Accepted $5,000 From Exxon Mobil Corporation. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

2014-2015: Kim Accepted $3,700 From Chevron Policy Government & Public Affairs. [California Secretary of State, Kim Contributions – All Assembly, accessed 2/2/18]

Renewable Energy

62 Kim Voted Against Requiring That The Amount Of Electricity Generated And Sold From Renewable Energy Resources Be Increased To 50 Percent By 2031

October 2015: Kim Voted Against Requiring That The Amount Of Electricity Generated And Sold From Renewable Energy Resources Be Increased To 50 Percent By 2031. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] that the amount of electricity generated and sold to retail customers per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to 50% by December 31, 2030, as provided. The bill would make other revisions to the RPS Program and to certain other requirements on public utilities and publicly owned electric utilities.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 27, with one not voting ,and became law. [SB 350, passed the Assembly, 9/11/15; became law 10/7/15]

June 2015: Kim Voted Against Expressing The Intent Of The Legislature To Increase The Amount Of Renewable Energy Resources By 50 Percent By 2031. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Express[ing] the intent of the Legislature for the purposes of the RPS program that the amount of electricity generated per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to an amount equal to at least 50% by December 31, 2030, and would require the PUC, by January 1, 2017, to establish the quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources to be procured by each retail seller for specified compliance periods sufficient to ensure that the procurement of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources achieves 50% of retail sales by December 31, 2030, and that retail sellers procure not less than 50% of retail sales in all subsequent years.” The bill passed the Assembly 46 to 29, with 5 not voting, but the Senate Appropriations committee placed the bill on suspense file. [AB 645, passed the Assembly, 6/3/15]

Coal Workers’ Benefits

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting State Retirement Boards From Making New Public Employee Retirement Fund Investments In Thermal Coal Companies

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting State Retirement Boards From Making New Public Employee Retirement Fund Investments In Thermal Coal Companies. In April 2015, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] the boards of the Public Employees’ Retirement System and the State Teachers’ Retirement System from making new investments or renewing existing investments of public employee retirement funds in a thermal coal company, as defined. This bill would require the boards to liquidate investments in thermal coal companies on or before July 1, 2017, and would require the boards, in making a determination to liquidate investments, to constructively engage with thermal coal companies to establish whether the companies are transitioning their business models to adapt to clean energy generation.” The bill passed the Assembly 47 to 30, with 3 not voting, [SB 185, passed the Assembly, 9/2/15; became law, 10/8/15]

Water Quality

Kim Voted Against Requiring Operators Of Oil Well And Drilling Projects To Monitor Surrounding Groundwater

Kim Voted Against Requiring Oil And Well Operators To Monitor Water Quality For Groundwater Surrounding Underground Oil Production. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the division to annually review underground injection or disposal projects approved by the division that use Class II wells. The bill would require the operator of the project, as a part of its application or the annual review process, to submit to the State Water Resources Control Board or appropriate regional water quality control board for its review and concurrence a groundwater monitoring plan containing certain information, including, among other things, a schedule for monitoring and reporting groundwater quality data, as provided. The bill would authorize the state board or appropriate regional water quality control board to periodically require the modification of the plan to reflect changing conditions. The bill would require the data be submitted to the state board in an electronic format

63 compatible with the state board’s geotracker database.” The bill failed the Assembly 28 to 33, with 19 not voting. [AB 356, failed the Assembly, 6/4/15]

64 Environmental Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim voted against fining an individual up to $10,000 for violating a water conservation program ordinance.

 Kim voted against authorizing a court to hold a person civilly liable for wasting water.

 Kim voted against authorizing the state to consolidate water systems within disadvantaged communities to provide safe drinking water.

 Kim did not vote on authorizing the state to provide temporary assistance for persons moving out of a house due to lack of potable water.

 Kim voted against establishing grants to develop neighborhood-level climate community plans to reduce greenhouse gases in disadvantaged communities.

 Kim voted against requiring at least 30 percent of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund be spent in disadvantaged communities or low-income households.

 Kim voted against requiring the state to take specified actions and conduct studies with respect to methane emissions.

 Kim voted against expanding zero-emission vehicle rebate programs to used cars.

 Kim voted against the California Global Warming Solutions Act, which requiring that the state ensure greenhouse gas emissions were reduced 40 percent below the 1990 level by 2030.

 Kim voted against establishing a program to coordinate regional and local efforts with state climate adaptation strategies to adapt to the impacts of climate change.

 Kim voted against requiring local governments to compose a vulnerability assessment identifying the risks that climate change poses.

 Kim voted against requiring the state to consider repeat violations of noncompliance with respect to hazardous waste control as reason to deny, suspend, or revoke a permit.

 Kim voted against expanding on hazardous waste permitting criteria.

 Kim voted against requiring one of the members of the California Coastal Commission to reside in a community disproportionately burdened by high levels of pollution.

 Kim voted against the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act, which required a 50 percent increase in renewable energy production and double energy efficiency savings by 2030.

 Kim received a zero percent rating from Sierra Club California for her Assembly voting record.

 Kim received a zero percent rating from the California League of Conservation Voters for her Assembly voting record.

65  Kim received a 23 percent rating from the California Environmental Justice Alliance for her Assembly voting record.

Water Issues

Water Conservation

Kim Voted Against Fining An Individual Up To $10,000 For Violating A Water Conservation Program Ordinance

Kim Voted Against Fining An Individual Up To $10,000 For Violating A Water Conservation Program Ordinance. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Provid[ing] that a court or public entity may hold a person civilly liable in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for a violation of a water conservation program ordinance or resolution, or certain emergency regulations adopted by the state board.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 28 and became law. [SB 88, passed the Assembly, 6/19/15; became law, 6/24/15]

Kim Voted Against Authorizing A Court To Hold A Person Civilly Liable For Wasting Water

Kim Voted Against Authorizing A Court Or Public Entity To Hold A Person Civilly Liable For Up To $10,000 For Wasting Water. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Provid[ing] that a court or public entity may hold a person civilly liable in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for a violation of a water conservation program ordinance or resolution, or certain emergency regulations adopted by the state board.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 28 and became law. [SB 88, passed the Assembly, 6/19/15; became law, 6/24/15]

Water Quality

Kim Voted Against Authorizing The State To Consolidate Water Systems Within Disadvantaged Communities To Provide Safe Drinking Water

Kim Voted Against Authorizing The State To Consolidate Water Systems Within Disadvantaged Communities To Provide Safe Drinking Water. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Authoriz[ing] the state board to order consolidation with a receiving water system where a public water system, or a state small water system within a disadvantaged community, consistently fails to provide an adequate supply of safe drinking water.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 28 and became law. [SB 88, passed the Assembly, 6/19/15; became law, 6/24/15]

Kim Did Not Vote On Authorizing The State To Provide Temporary Assistance For Persons Moving Out Of A House Due To Lack Of Potable Water

Kim Did Not Vote On Authorizing The State To Provide Temporary Assistance For Persons Moving Out Of A House Due To Lack Of Potable Water. In June 2015, Kim did not vote on: “Authoriz[ing] the department to provide temporary assistance for persons moving out of a housing unit due to a lack of potable water resulting from the state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor relating to drought conditions if the person has exhausted all reasonable attempts to find a potable water source and the housing unit is served by a private well or water utility with fewer than 15 connections that is running out of potable water due to drought conditions.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 26, with 2 not voting, and became law. [SB 84, passed the Assembly, 6/29/15; became law, 6/24/15]

Emission Reduction

66 Kim Voted Against Establishing Grants To Develop Neighborhood-Level Climate Community Plans To Reduce Greenhouse Gases In Disadvantaged Communities

Kim Voted Against Establishing Grants To Develop And Implement Neighborhood-Level Climate Community Plans To Reduce Greenhouse Gases In Disadvantaged Communities. In August 2016, Kim voted against: “Creat[ing] the Transformative Climate Communities Program, to be administered by the council. The bill would require the council to award competitive grants to specified eligible entities for the development and implementation of neighborhood-level transformative climate community plans that include greenhouse gas emissions reduction projects that provide local economic, environmental, and health benefits to disadvantaged communities, as defined.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 49 to 27, with 4 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 2722, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/31/16; became law, 9/14/16]

Kim Voted Against Requiring At Least 30 Percent Of The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Be Spent In Disadvantaged Communities Or Low-Income Households

Kim Voted Against Requiring At Least 30 Percent Of The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Be Spent On Projects Benefiting Individuals Living In Disadvantaged Communities Or Low-Income Households. In August 2016, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the investment plan to allocate (1) a minimum of 25% of the available moneys in the fund to projects located within, and benefiting individuals living in, disadvantaged communities, (2) an additional minimum of 5% to projects that benefit low-income households or to projects located within, and benefiting individuals living in, low-income communities located anywhere in the state, and (3) an additional minimum of 5% either to projects that benefit low-income households that are outside of, but within 1 a /2 mile of, disadvantaged communities, or to projects located within the boundaries of, and benefiting individuals 1 living in, low-income communities that are outside of, but within a /2 mile of, disadvantaged communities.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 53 to 22, with 5 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1550, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/31/16; became law, 9/14/16]

Kim Voted Against Requiring The State To Take Specified Actions And Conduct Studies With Respect To Methane Emissions

Kim Voted Against Requiring The State To Take Specified Actions And Conduct Specified Analyses With Respect To Methane Emissions. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the state board [State Air Resources Board] to take specified actions and conduct specified analyses with respect to methane emissions.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 57 to 22, with one not voting, and became law. [AB 1496, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/10/15; became law, 10/18/15]

Kim Voted Against Expanding Zero-Emission Vehicle Rebate Programs To Used Cars

Kim Voted Against Expanding Zero-Emission Vehicle Rebate Programs To Used Cars. Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the state board [State Air Resources Board] to establish the Clean Reused Vehicle Rebate Project, as a part of the Air Quality Improvement Program, to provide rebates or other incentives for the acquisition of an eligible used vehicle [a vehicle eligible for a rebate under the Clean Vehicle Rebate Project], as defined; the replacement or refurbishment of a battery and related components for an eligible used vehicle or an extended warranty for the battery or related components; or an extended service warranty to cover unexpected vehicle repairs not covered by the manufacturer’s warranty related to unique problems in eligible used vehicles, as specified.” The bill passed the Assembly 58 to 20, with 2 not voting, but in the latest action, the Senate Appropriations committee placed the bill on suspense file. [AB 904, passed the Assembly, 6/2/15]

Climate Change

Kim Voted Against The California Global Warming Solution Act

67 2015: Kim Voted Against The California Global Warming Solutions Act, Which Required That The State Ensure Greenhouse Gas Emission Were Reduced To 40 Percent Below The 1990 Level By 2030. In August 2016, Kim voted against: ‘“Requir[ing] the state board to ensure that statewide greenhouse gas emissions are reduced to 40% below the 1990 level by 2030.” The bill passed the assembly 48 to 31, with one not voting, and became law. [SB 32, passed the Assembly, 8/23/16; became law, 9/8/16]

Kim Voted Against Establishing A Program To Coordinate Regional And Local Efforts With State Climate Adaptation Strategies To Adapt To The Impacts Of Climate Change

Kim Voted Against Establishing A Program To Coordinate Regional And Local Efforts With State Climate Adaptation Strategies To Adapt To The Impacts Of Climate Change. Kim voted against: “Establish[ing] the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program to be administered by the Office of Planning and Research to coordinate regional and local efforts with state climate adaptation strategies to adapt to the impacts of climate change, as specified.” The bill passed the Assembly 56 to 23, with 1 not voting, and became law. [SB 246, passed the Assembly 9/8/15; became law, 10/8/15]

Kim Voted Against Requiring Local Governments To Compose A Vulnerability Assessment Identifying The Risks Climate Change Poses

Kim Voted Against Requiring The Legislative Body Of A City Or County To Compose A Vulnerability Assessment Identifying The Risks Climate Change Poses. In August 2015, Kim voted against: “[A] bill [that] would, upon the next revision of a local hazard mitigation plan on or after January 1, 2017, or, if the local jurisdiction has not adopted a local hazard mitigation plan, beginning on or before January 1, 2022, require the safety element [of the Planning and Zoning Law] to be reviewed and updated as necessary to address climate adaptation and resiliency strategies applicable to that city or county. The bill would require the update to include a set of goals, policies, and objectives based on a vulnerability assessment, identifying the risks that climate change poses to the local jurisdiction and the geographic areas at risk from climate change impacts, and specified information from federal, state, regional, and local agencies.” The bill passed the Assembly 55 to 25 and became law. [SB 379, passed the Assembly, 8/31/15; became law, 10/8/15]

Hazardous Waste

Kim Voted Against Requiring The State To Consider Repeat Violations Of Noncompliance With Respect To Hazardous Waste Control As Reason To Restrict A Permit

Kim Voted Against Requiring The State To Consider Repeat Violations Of Noncompliance With Respect To Hazardous Waste Control As Reason To Deny, Suspend, Or Revoke A Permit. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the department [Department of Toxic Substances Control] to consider, except under specified circumstances, 3 or more violations of, or noncompliance with, specified provisions for which a person or entity has been found liable or has been convicted, with respect to a single hazardous waste facility within a 5-year period, as compelling cause to deny, suspend, or revoke a permit, registration, or certificate applied for by, or issued to, that person or entity.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 54 to 25, with one not voting, and became law. [AB 1075, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/9/15; became law, 10/2/15]

Kim Voted Against Expanding Hazardous Waste Permitting Criteria

Kim Voted Against Expanding On Hazardous Waste Permitting Criteria. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the department [Department of Toxic Substances Control], by January 1, 2018, to establish or update criteria for use in determining whether to issue a new or modified hazardous waste facilities permit or a renewal of a hazardous waste facilities permit, and to develop and implement, by July 1, 2018, programmatic reforms designed to improve the protectiveness, timeliness, legal defensibility, and enforceability of the

68 department’s permitting program.” The bill passed the Assembly 50 to 25, with 5 not voting, and became law. [SB 673, passed the Assembly, 9/11/15; became law, 10/8/15]

Pollution

Kim Voted Against Requiring One Of The Members Of The California Coastal Commission To Reside In A Community Disproportionately Burdened By High Levels Of Pollution

Kim Voted Against Requiring One Of The Members Of The California Coastal Commission To Reside In A Community Disproportionately Burdened By High Levels Of Pollution. In August 2016, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] ne of the members of the commission appointed by the Governor to reside in, and work directly with, communities in the state that are disproportionately burdened by, and vulnerable to, high levels of pollution and issues of environmental justice, as defined.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 51 to 25, with 4 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 2616, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/30/16; became law, 9/24/16]

Clean Energy And Pollution Reduction Act

Kim Voted Against The Clean Energy And Pollution Reduction Act

2015: Kim Voted Against The Clean Energy And Pollution Reduction Act, Which Required A 50 Percent Increase In Renewable Energy Production And Double Energy Efficiency Savings By 2030. Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] that the amount of electricity generated and sold to retail customers per year from eligible renewable energy resources be increased to 50% by December 31, 2030, as provided. The bill would make other revisions to the RPS Program and to certain other requirements on public utilities and publicly owned electric utilities. […] This bill would require the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to establish annual targets for statewide energy efficiency savings and demand reduction that will achieve a cumulative doubling of statewide energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses of retail customers by January 1, 2030.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 26, with one not voting, and became law. [SB 350, passed the Assembly, 9/11/15; became law, 10/7/15]

State Air Resources Board

Kim Voted Against Adding Two Additional Legislators To The State Air Resources Board

Kim Voted Against Adding Two Additional Legislators To The State Air Resources Board. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Increas[ing] the membership of the [State Air Resources Board] to 14 [from 12], with the Senate Committee on Rules and the Speaker of the Assembly each appointing one member, as provided.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 52 to 26, with 2 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1288, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/12/15; became law, 10/8/15]

Environmental Interest Group Ratings

Kim Received A Zero Percent Rating From Sierra Club California

Kim Received A Zero Percent Rating From Sierra Club California For Her Assembly Voting Record. [Sierra Club California, 2016 Report Card, accessed 2/7/18]

Kim Received A Zero Percent Rating From The California League Of Conservation Voters

69 Kim Received A Zero Percent Rating From The California League Of Conservation Voters For Her Assembly Voting Record. [California League of Conservation Voters, California Environmental Scorecard, accessed 2/7/18]

Kim Received A 23 Percent Rating From The California Environmental Justice Alliance

Kim Received A 23 Percent Rating From The California Environmental Justice Alliance For Her Assembly Voting Record. [California Environmental Justice Alliance, Environmental Justice Scorecard 2016, accessed 2/7/18]

70 FEMA & Disaster Relief

Items of Interest

 Kim did not vote on requiring state agencies to prioritize high-risk fire hazard areas when determining where to enhance wildfire protections.

 Kim authored a bill that would exempt “qualified disaster preparedness products” from sales taxes.

Wildfires

Kim Did Not Vote On Requiring State Agencies To Prioritize High-Risk Fire Hazard Areas When Determining Where To Enhance Wildfire Protections

Kim Did Not Vote On Requiring State Agencies To Prioritize High-Risk Fire Hazard Areas When Determining Where To Enhance Wildfire Mitigation Measures Associated With Electrical Lines And Equipment. In August 2016, Kim did not vote on: “Requir[ing] the commission [Public Utilities Commission], in consultation with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, to prioritize areas in which communities are subject to conditions that increase fire hazards associated with overhead utility facilities when determining areas in which it will require enhanced mitigation measures for wildfire hazards posed by overhead electrical lines and equipment.” The bill passed the Assembly 75 to 0, with 5 not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [SB 1463, passed the Assembly, 8/18/16; vetoed by Governor, 9/24/16]

Disaster Preparedness

Kim Authored A Bill That Would Exempt “Qualified Disaster Preparedness Products” From Sales Taxes

Kim Authored A Bill That Would Exempt “Qualified Disaster Preparedness Products” From Sales Taxes. “Under existing law, a sale or purchase of tangible personal property pursuant to a layaway agreement or raincheck, or under certain conditions, is considered a sale or purchase only when both payment and delivery are complete. This bill would exempt from those taxes the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, qualified disaster preparedness products sold or purchased during the 2-day 1-day period beginning at 12:01 a.m. on the 2nd Saturday in October 2017, and ending at 12:00 midnight the following Sunday, of that day, or for which a layaway agreement is entered into, a raincheck is issued, or other specified orders are placed, during this period, as specified.” In the latest action, the bill was held in committee without further action. [AB 1562, Authored, 5/17/16; Held in committee without further action, 11/30/16]

2016: Kim Advocated For Exempting Necessities From Sales Taxes. “Assemblywoman Young Kim, R- Fullerton, also advocates exempting ‘necessities’ from sales taxes. Her bill, introduced this week but awaiting a hearing, would exempt, for two days only, "qualified disaster preparedness products," to encourage Californians to stock up on what they'd need in event of a major storm, fire or earthquake.” [San Diego Union- Tribune, 1/8/16]

71 Gun Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim voted against redefining “assault weapons” to include a semiautomatic centerfire rifle or pistol that does not have a fixed magazine and requiring owners to register the guns with the state.

 Kim twice voted against revising the definition of “assault weapons” to include semiautomatic centerfire rifles or semiautomatic pistols without fixed magazines.

 Kim voted against prohibiting large-capacity magazines.

 Kim voted against prohibiting concealed weapons on school grounds.

 Kim voted against allowing county sheriffs to enter into agreements with police chiefs to process concealed handgun applications.

 Kim voted against adding the petty theft of firearms, carrying ammunition onto school grounds, and receiving stolen property consisting of a firearm to a list of misdemeanors that would prohibit violators from owning a firearm within 10 years of conviction.

 Kim voted to make false reports about lost or stolen firearms a misdemeanor and prohibit violators from owning firearms within 10 years of conviction.

 Kim voted against prohibiting more than one gun from being purchased in a 30-day period.

 Kim voted against expanding the definition of “firearms” to stop the creation of homemade weapons without serial numbers called “ghost guns.”

 Kim voted against expanding the list of people who could petition for a gun violence restraining order.

 Kim voted against allocating $5 million to reduce the backlog of individuals who are in the Armed Prohibited Persons System and who illegally possess firearms.

 Kim voted against increasing transaction fees to support certain state programs.

 Kim received an “A” rating from the NRA.

 Kim received an “A” rating from Gun Owners of California.

Assault Weapons

Kim Voted Against Redefining “Assault Weapons” To Require Owners To Register The Guns With The State

Kim Voted Against Redefining “Assault Weapons” To Include Semiautomatic Centerfire Rifles Or Pistols That Do Not Have A Fixed Magazine And Requiring Owners To Register The Guns With The State. “Revis[ing] this definition of ‘assault weapon’ to mean a semiautomatic centerfire rifle or a semiautomatic pistol that does not have a fixed magazine but has any one of those specified attributes. The bill would also define ‘fixed magazine’ to mean an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a

72 manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action. […] This bill would require that any person who, from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016, inclusive, lawfully possessed an assault weapon that does not have a fixed magazine, as defined, including those weapons with an ammunition feeding device that can be removed readily from the firearm with the use of a tool, register the firearm with the Department of Justice before January 1, 2018, but not before the effective date of specified regulations.” The bill passed the Assembly 43 to 31, with 6 not voting, but, in the latest action, died on Senate inactive file. [AB 1664, passed the Assembly, 6/1/16; died on Senate inactive file, 11/30/16]

Kim Twice Voted Against Revising The Definition Of “Assault Weapons” To Include Semiautomatic Centerfire Rifles Or Semiautomatic Pistols Without Fixed Magazines

Kim Voted Against Revising The Definition Of “Assault Weapon” To Include A Semiautomatic Centerfire Rifles Or Semiautomatic Pistols That Do Not Have A Fixed Magazine. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Revis[ing] this definition of ‘assault weapon’ to mean a semiautomatic centerfire rifle or a semiautomatic pistol that does not have a fixed magazine but has any one of those specified attributes. The bill would also define ‘fixed magazine’ to mean an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 46 to 30, with 4 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1135, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 6/30/16; became law, 7/1/16]

Kim Voted Against Revising The Definition Of An “Assault Weapon” To Include Semiautomatic Centerfire Rifles Or Semiautomatic Pistols That Do Not Have Fixed Magazines. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Revis[ing] this definition of ‘assault weapon’ to mean a semiautomatic centerfire rifle, or a semiautomatic pistol that does not have a fixed magazine but has any one of those specified attributes. The bill would also define ‘fixed magazine’ to mean an ammunition feeding device contained in, or permanently attached to, a firearm in such a manner that the device cannot be removed without disassembly of the firearm action.” The bill passed the Assembly 44 to 30, with 6 not voting, and became law. [SB 880, passed the Assembly, 6/30/16; became law, 7/1/16]

High-Capacity Magazines

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting The Possession Of Large-Capacity Magazines

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting The Possession Of Large-Capacity Magazines. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Mak[ing] it [the sale, gift, and loan of a large-capacity magazine] an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed $100 for the first offense, by a fine not to exceed $250 for the 2nd offense, and by a fine not to exceed $500 for the 3rd or subsequent offense, for a person to possess any large-capacity magazine, regardless of the date the magazine was acquired.” The bill passed the Assembly 44 to 31, with 5 not voting, and became law. [SB 1446, passed the Assembly, 6/30/16; became law, 7/1/16]

Concealed Carry

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Concealed Weapons On School Grounds

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Concealing Weapons On School Grounds. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Recast[ing] the provisions relating to a person holding a valid license to carry a concealed firearm to allow that person to carry a firearm in an area that is within 1,000 feet of, but not on the grounds of, a public or private school providing instruction in kindergarten or grades 1 to 12, inclusive. The bill would also delete the exemption that allows a person holding a valid license to carry a concealed firearm to bring or possess a firearm on the campus of a university or college. The bill would create an additional exemption from those prohibitions for certain appointed peace officers who are authorized to carry a firearm by their appointing agency, and an exemption for certain retired reserve peace officers who are authorized to carry a concealed or loaded firearm.” The bill passed

73 the Assembly 54 to 24, with 2 not voting, and became law. [SB 707, passed the Assembly, 9/1/15; became law, 10/10/15]

Kim Voted Against Allowing County Sheriffs To Enter Into Agreements With Police Chiefs To Process Concealed Handgun Applications

Kim Voted Against Allowing County Sheriffs To Enter Into Agreements With Police Chiefs To Process Concealed Handgun Applications. In April and September 2015, Kim voted against: “Provid[ing] that a sheriff is not precluded from entering into an agreement with the chief or other head of a municipal police department of a city for the chief or other head of a municipal police department to process all applications for licenses to carry a concealed handgun, renewals of those licenses, and amendments of those licenses, for that city’s residents.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 49 to 30, with one not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1134, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/4/15; became law, 10/11/15]

Gun Crimes

Kim Voted Against Adding The Petty Theft Of Firearms Or Carrying Ammunition Onto School Grounds Misdemeanors And Prohibited Violators From Owning A Firearm

Kim Voted Against Adding The Petty Theft Of A Firearms, Carrying Ammunition Onto School Grounds, And Receiving Stolen Property Consisting Of A Firearm To A List Of Misdemeanors And Prohibiting Violators From Owning A Firearm Within 10 Years Of Conviction. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Add[ing] to the list of misdemeanors, the conviction for which is subject to the above prohibition on possessing a firearm within 10 years of the conviction, the petty theft of a firearm, and convictions on or after January 1, 2016, for the misdemeanor offenses of carrying ammunition onto school grounds and receiving stolen property consisting of a firearm. The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes. Because a violation of these provisions would be a crime, and because this bill would expand the application of the crime to a larger class of potential offenders, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.” The bill passed the Assembly 46 to 30, with 4 not voting, but was vetoed by the Governor. [SB 347, passed the Assembly, 9/8/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/3/15]

Kim Voted To Make False Reports About Lost Or Stolen Firearms A Misdemeanor And Prohibiting Violators From Owning Firearms

Kim Voted To Make False Reports About Lost Or Stolen Firearms A Misdemeanor And Prohibiting Violators From Owning A Firearms Within 10 Years Of Conviction. In June 2016, Kim voted for: “Mak[ing] that prohibition applicable to a person who reports to certain individuals and peace officers that a firearm has been lost or stolen, knowing the report to be false. By changing the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also make it a misdemeanor for a person convicted of violating this provision to own a firearm within 10 years of the conviction.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 52 to 25, with 3 not voting, and became law. [AB 1695, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 6/30/16; became law, 7/1/16]

Purchase Limits

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting More Than One Gun From Being Purchased In A 30-Day Period

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting More Than One Gun Of Any Type From Being Purchased In A 30-Day Period. Kim voted against: “Mak[ing] the 30-day prohibition and the dealer delivery prohibition [prohibiting a person from making more than one application to purchase a handgun within any 30-day period, and prohibits a firearms dealer from delivering a handgun to a person whenever the dealer is notified by the Department of Justice that within the preceding 30-day period the purchaser has made another application to purchase a handgun]

74 described above applicable to all types of firearms.” The bill passed the Assembly 44 to 34, with 2 not voting, but was vetoed by the Governor. [AB 1674, passed the Assembly, 6/30/16; vetoed by Governor, 7/1/16]

“Ghost Guns”

Kim Voted Against Expanding The Definition Of “Firearm” To Stop The Creation Of “Ghost Guns”

Kim Voted Against Expanding The Definition Of Firearms To Stop The Creation Of Homemade Weapons With Serial Numbers Called “Ghost Guns.” In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Assembly Bill 1673, by Assemblyman Mike Gipson, D-Carson, which would have expanded the definition of ‘firearm’ to curb homemade weapons created without serial numbers, or ‘ghost guns.’” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 46 to 33, with one not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 1673, Assembly concurred with Senate Amendments, 6/30/16; vetoed by Governor, 7/1/16; Sacramento Bee, 7/1/16]

Restraining Orders

Kim Voted Against Expanding The List Of Individuals Who Could Petition For A Gun Violence Restraining Order

Kim Voted Against Expanding A Gun Violence Restraining Order Scope To Allow Employers, Coworkers, Mental Health Workers, Or School Employees To Petition. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Authoriz[ing] an employer, a coworker, a mental health worker who has seen the person as a patient in the last 6 months, or an employee of a secondary or postsecondary school that the person has attended in the last 6 months to file a petition for an ex parte, one-year, or renewed gun violence restraining order. This bill would also specify that these provisions shall not be construed to require any of those persons to seek a gun violence restraining order.” The bill passed the Assembly 41 to 37, with 2 not voting, but was vetoed by the Governor. [AB 2607, passed the Assembly, 6/30/16; vetoed by Governor, 8/1/16]

Gun Databases

Kim Voted Against A Budget Allocating $5 Million To Reduce The Backlog Of Individuals On The Armed Prohibited Persons System

Kim Voted Against A Budget Allocating $5 Million To Reduce The Backlog Of Individuals Who Are In The Armed Prohibited Persons System And Who Illegally Possess Firearms. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Mak[ing] appropriations for the support of state government for the 2016-17 fiscal year. […] For local assistance, Department of Justice, payable from the Firearms Safety and Enforcement Special Fund…5,000,000. Provisions: 1. The funds appropriated in this item shall be expended to contract with local law enforcement agencies to reduce the backlog of individuals who are in the Armed Prohibited Persons System (APPS) and who illegally possess firearms. The focus on reducing the APPS backlog shall be on persons with mental illness and with domestic violence restraining orders who are prohibited persons in possession of firearms.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 27, with one not voting, and became law. [SB 826, passed the Assembly, 6/15/16; became law, 6/27/16]

Transaction Fees

Kim Voted Against Increasing Transaction Fees To Support Certain State Programs

Kim Voted Against Increasing A Fee For Each Firearm Transaction For The Purpose Of Supporting State Programs Related To The Deadly Weapons Recodification Act Of 2010. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Author[izing] the Department of Justice to increase that fee [requiring each dealer to charge each firearm 75 purchaser or transferee a fee not to exceed $1 for each firearm transaction for the purpose of supporting department program costs related to the Deadly Weapons Recodification Act of 2010] at a rate not to exceed any increase in the California Consumer Price Index and not to exceed the reasonable cost of regulation to the department.” The bill passed the Assembly 51 to 27, with 2 not voting, and became law. [SB 843, passed the Assembly, 6/16/16; became law, 6/27/16]

Interest Group Ratings

Kim Received An “A” Rating From The NRA

Kim Received An “A” Rating From The National Rifle Association. [NRA-Political Victory Fund, California – 2016 Archive, accessed 3/9/18]

Kim Received An “A” Rating From Gun Owners Of California

Kim Received An “A” Rating From Gun Owners Of California, A Pro-Gun Special Interest Group, For Her Assembly Voting Record. [Gun Owners of California, California Candidate Scorecard, accessed 2/7/18]

2016: Gun Owners Of California Endorsed Kim During Her Reelection Campaign For California’s 65th Assembly District. [GOC PAC, 2016 Statewide Candidates, accessed 2/21/18]

76 Health Care Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim voted to eliminate immunization exemptions related to personal beliefs.

 Kim voted to prohibit a person from being employed or volunteering at day care centers without receiving certain immunizations.

 Kim voted to require low-income children receive age-appropriate immunizations to apply for financial assistance.

 Kim voted to require the state to establish and administer a fund improving childhood immunization rates.

 Kim voted to prohibit copayments from exceeding $250 for drug treatments necessary for AIDS/HIV.

 Kim voted to prohibit denying a person an organ transplant for testing positive for marijuana use.

 Kim did not vote on establishing the licensing and regulatory framework for medical marijuana.

 Kim received a 67 percent rating from the Drug Policy Forum of California.

 The Drug Policy Forum of California listed Kim on their “Hall of Shame” for legislators who opposed Proposition 64, which legalized recreational marijuana use.

Immunizations

Kim Voted To ELiminate Immunization Exemptions Related To Personal Beliefs

Kim Voted To ELiminate An Exemption That Allowed Parents To Not Vaccinate Their Children Due To Personal Beliefs. In June 2015, Kim voted for: “Elimat[ing] the exemption from existing specified immunization requirements based upon personal beliefs, but would allow exemption from future immunization requirements deemed appropriate by the State Department of Public Health for either medical reasons or personal beliefs.” The bill passed the assembly 46 to 31, with 3 not voting, and became law. [SB 277, passed the Assembly, 6/25/15; became law, 6/30/15]

Kim Voted To Prohibit A Person From Being Employed Or Volunteering At Day Care Centers Without Receiving Certain Immunizations

Kim Voted To Prohibit A Person From Being Employed Or Volunteering At A Day Care Center Or Family Day Care Home Without Receiving Immunizations Against Influenza, Pertussis, And Measles. In September 2015, Kim voted for: “Prohibit[ing] a person from being employed or volunteering at a day care center or a family day care home if he or she has not been immunized against influenza, pertussis, and measles.” The bill passed the Assembly 60 to 16, with 4 not voting, and became law. [SB 792, passed the Assembly, 9/8/15; became law, 10/11/15]

Kim Voted To Require Low-Income Children Receive Age-Appropriate Immunizations To Apply For Financial Assistance

77 Kim Voted To Require Low-Income Children Receive Age-Appropriate Immunizations To Apply For Financial Assistance. In September 2015, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] the [California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids program] applicant or recipient to ensure that each child in the assistance unit who is not required to be enrolled in school has received all age-appropriate immunizations.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 78 to 0, with 2 not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 376, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/8/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/11/15]

Kim Voted To Require The State To Establish And Administer A Fund Improving Childhood Immunization Rates

Kim Voted To Require The Department Of Health Care Services To Establish And Administer A Fund Improving Childhood Immunization Rates. In June 2015, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] the State Department of Health Care Services to establish and administer the California Childhood Immunization Quality Improvement Fund (CCIQIF) program to improve childhood immunization rates, and would require the department to submit an application to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for a waiver to implement a 5-year demonstration project to implement the program.” The bill passed the Assembly 65 to 12, with 3 not voting, but, in the latest action, was held in Senate committee without further action. [AB 1117, passed the Assembly, 6/30/15]

AIDS/HIV

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Copayments From Exceeding $250 For Drug Treatments Necessary For AIDS/HIV

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Copayments From Exceeding $250 For Antiretroviral Drug Treatments Medically Necessary For The Treatments Of AIDS/HIV. Kim voted against: “Provid[ing] that the copayment, coinsurance, or any other form of cost sharing for a covered outpatient prescription drug for an individual prescription shall not exceed $250 for a supply of up to 30 days, except as specified, and would prohibit, for a nongrandfathered individual or small group plan contract or policy, the annual deductible for outpatient drugs from exceeding a specified amount. The bill would make these cost-sharing limits applicable only to covered outpatient prescription drugs that constitute essential health benefits, as defined. The bill would require a plan contract or policy to cover a single-tablet prescription drug regimen for combination antiretroviral drug treatments that are medically necessary for the treatment of AIDS/HIV, as specified.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 50 to 27, with 3 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 339, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; became law, 10/8/15]

Marijuana Issues

Kim Voted To Prohibit Denying A Person An Organ Transplant For Testing Positive For Marijuana Use

Kim Voted To Prohibit A Person From Being Denied An Organ Transplant Based Solely Upon A Positive Test For The Use Of Medical Marijuana By A Potential Recipient. In April 2015, Kim voted for: “Prohibit[ing] a hospital, physician and surgeon, procurement organization, or other person from determining the ultimate recipient of an anatomical gift based solely upon a potential recipient’s status as a qualified patient, as specified, or based solely upon a positive test for the use of medical marijuana by a potential recipient who is a qualified patient, except to the extent that the qualified patient’s use of medical marijuana has been found by a physician and surgeon, following a case-by-case evaluation of the potential recipient, to be medically significant to the provision of the anatomical gift.” The bill passed the Assembly 64 to 12, with 4 not voting, and became law. [AB 258, passed the Assembly, 4/30/15; became law, 7/6/15]

78 Kim Did Not Vote On Establishing The Licensing And Regulatory Framework For Medical Marijuana

Kim Did Not Vote On Establishing The Licensing And Regulatory Framework For Medical Marijuana Under The Medical Marijuana Regulation And Safety Act. In September 2015, Kim did not vote on: “Enact[ing] the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act for the licensure and regulation of medical marijuana and would establish within the Department of Consumer Affairs the Bureau of Medical Marijuana Regulation, under the supervision and control of the Director of Consumer Affairs. The bill would require the director to administer and enforce the provisions of the act.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 59 to 14, with 7 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 266, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Interest Group Ratings

Kim Received A 67 Percent Rating From The Drug Policy Forum Of California

Kim Received A 67 Percent Rating From The Drug Policy Forum Of California For Her Assembly Voting Record. [Drug Policy Forum of California, California State Legislature Scorecard 2015-2016, accessed 2/7/18]

The Drug Policy Forum Of California Was An Organization “Dedicated To News Of Interest To The California Drug Reform Community.” [Drug Policy Forum of California, accessed 2/21/18]

2016: The Drug Policy Forum Of California Listed Kim On Their “Legislative Hall Of Shame” For Her Opposition To Proposition 64, Which Legalized Recreational Marijuana Usage

2016: The Drug Policy Forum Of California Listed Kim On Their “Legislative Hall Of Shame” For Her Opposition To Proposition 64. [Drug Policy Forum of California, Voters Guide to Drug Policy Reform Candidates and Measures – November 2016, accessed 2/21/18]

Proposition 64 Legalized Marijuana Usage For Adults 21 And Older In California. [State of California, Proposition 64, accessed 2/21/18]

79 Housing Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim voted against a budget bill providing assistance to low- and moderate-income first-time homebuyers.

 Kim voted against awarding monetary incentives for solar energy systems installed on affordable housing properties.

 Kim voted against reducing parking requirements for affordable, senior citizen, and special needs housing projects.

 Kim voted against repealing eligibility limitations on income and assets for the CalWORKs Program, which provided cash aid and services to eligible families that have children at home.

 Kim voted against specifying that visible mold be classified as a substandard condition.

 Kim did not vote on prescribing the duty of a landlord to treat and control bedbugs.

First-Time Homebuyers

Kim Voted Against A Budget Bill Providing Assistance To Low- And Moderate-Income First-Time Homebuyers

Kim Voted Against A Budget Bill Providing Assistance To Low And Moderate-Income First-Time Homebuyers. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Modify[ing] the program [Roberti-Green Home Purchase Assistance Program, which provides first-time homebuyers with home purchase assistance in the form of interest rate subsidies and downpayment assistance] to instead provide home purchase assistance to low- and moderate- income homebuyers to qualify for the purchase of owner-occupied homes and would revise the terms under which that assistance is provided.” The bill passed the Assembly 49 to 27, with 4 not voting, and became law. [SB 837, passed the Assembly, 6/16/16; became law, 6/27/16]

Affordable Housing

Kim Voted Against Awarding Monetary Incentives For Solar Energy Systems Installed On Affordable Housing Properties

Kim Voted Against Awarding Monetary Incentives For Solar Energy Systems Installed On Affordable Housing Properties. Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the commission to annually authorize the allocation of $100,000,000 or 10% of available funds, whichever is less, beginning with the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2016, and ending with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2020, from the greenhouse gas allowance revenues received by electrical corporations set aside for clean energy and energy efficiency projects for the Multifamily Affordable Housing Solar Roofs Program, which the bill would create. […] The bill would require the commission to authorize, by June 30, 2017, the award of monetary incentives for solar energy systems, as defined, that are installed on qualified multifamily affordable housing properties, as defined, through December 31, 2030, with the target of the program being to install a combined generating capacity of at least 300 megawatts on qualified properties.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 51 to 28, with one not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 693, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; became law, 10/8/15]

80 Kim Voted Against Reducing Parking Requirements For Affordable, Senior Citizen, And Special Needs Housing Projects

Kim Voted Against Reducing Parking Requirements For Affordable, Senior Citizen, And Special Needs Housing Projects. In June and September 2015, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] , at the request of the developer, a city, county, or city and county from imposing a vehicular parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, in excess of 0.5 spaces per bedroom on a development that includes the maximum percentage of low- or very low income units […] . The bill would also prohibit, at the request of the developer, a city, county, or city and county from imposing a vehicular parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, […] if the 1 development is within /2 mile of a major transit stop and there is unobstructed access to the transit stop from the development, is a for-rent housing development for individuals that are 62 years of age or older that complies with specified existing laws regarding senior housing, or is a special needs housing development, as those terms are defined. […] The bill would authorize a city, county, or city and county to impose a higher vehicular parking ratio based on substantial evidence found in an areawide or jurisdictionwide parking study, as specified.” The bill passed the Assembly 54 to 25, with one vote not recorded. The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 52 to 25, with one vote not recorded, and the bill became law. [AB 744, passed the Assembly, 6/4/15; Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/2/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Public Assistance Programs

Kim Voted Against Repealing Eligibility Limitations On Income And Assets For The CalWORKs Program

Kim Voted Against Repealing Limitations On Income And Assets With Regard To Eligibility For The California Work Opportunity And Responsibility To Kids (CalWORKs) Program. Kim voted against: “Repeal[ing] those limitations on assets [limitations on income and assets generally applicable to public assistance programs] with regard to eligibility for CalWORKs, thereby eliminating the consideration of an individual’s or family’s assets as a condition of eligibility for CalWORKs.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 28, but in the latest action, the Senate Appropriations committee placed the bill on suspense file. [AB 1809, passed the Assembly, 6/2/16]

The CalWORKs Program Provided Cash Aid And Services To Eligible Families That Have Children At Home. “CalWORKs is a public assistance program that provides cash aid and services to eligible families that have a child(ren) in the home. The program serves all 58 counties in the state and is operated locally by county welfare departments. If a family has little or no cash and needs housing, food, utilities, clothing or medical care, they may be eligible to receive immediate short-term help. Families that apply and qualify for ongoing assistance receive money each month to help pay for housing, food and other necessary expenses.” [California Department of Social Services, CalWORKs, accessed 2/20/18]

Hazardous Living Environment

Kim Voted Against Specifying That Visible Mold Be Classified As A Substandard Condition

Kim Voted Against Specifying That Visible Mold Be Classified As A Substandard Condition. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Specify[ing]that visible mold growth, excepting mold that is minor and found on surfaces that can accumulate moisture as part of their proper and intended use, is a type of inadequate sanitation and therefore a substandard condition.” The bill passed the Assembly 44 to 28, with 8 not voting, and became law. [SB 655, passed the Assembly, 9/2/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Kim Did Not Vote On Prescribing The Duty Of A Landlord To Treat And Control Bedbugs

81 Kim Did Not Vote On Prescribing The Duty Of A Landlord To Treat And Control Bedbugs. In August 2016, Kim did not vote on: “Prescrib[ing] he duties of landlords and tenants with regard to the treatment and control of bed bugs. The bill would require a landlord to provide a prospective tenant, on and after July 1, 2017, and to all other tenants by January 1, 2018, information about bed bugs, as specified. The bill would require that the landlord provide notice to the tenants of those units inspected by the pest control operator of the pest control operator’s findings within 2 business days, as specified. The bill would prohibit a landlord from showing, renting, or leasing a vacant dwelling unit that the landlord knows has a bed bug infestation, as specified.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 65 to 15, and the bill became law. [AB 551, passed the Assembly, 8/29/15; became law, 9/25/16]

82 Immigration & Border Issues

Items of Interest

 In June 2015, Kim voted against an omnibus funding bill that extended state health care benefits to undocumented children.

 In September 2015, Kim did not vote on extending state health care benefits to undocumented children.

 Kim did not vote on requiring the state to apply for a federal waiver allowing undocumented individuals to receive a California qualified health benefit plan.

 Kim voted against prohibiting employees from using the e-verify system to check the employment authorization status of an existing employee or applicant.

 Kim voted against a resolution urging the federal government to investigate the alleged misuse of the H1-B visa program.

 Kim voted against allowing undocumented children to recover civil damages under any applicable law.

 Kim did not vote on establishing a statewide director of immigrant integration for developing reports on programs serving immigrants.

 Kim voted against requiring certain state institutions of higher education to create campus resource centers to assist DREAMers.

 Kim did not support a path to legal citizenship for undocumented immigrants, despite being an immigrant turned U.S. citizen herself.

 Kim indicated she would have voted against allowing noncitizen residents on juries.

 Kim indicated she would have voted against prohibiting law enforcement from detaining individuals for immigration issues when they would have otherwise been freed.

Health Care

Kim Voted Against Extending State Health Care Benefits To Undocumented Children

June 2015: Kim Voted Against An Omnibus Funding Bill That Extended State Health Care Benefits To Undocumented Children

Kim Voted Against An Omnibus Funding Bill That Extended Eligibility For Medi-Cal Benefits To Children Under The Age Of 19, Regardless Of Immigration Status. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Extend[ing] eligibility for full-scope Medi-Cal benefits to individuals under 19 years of age who do not have, or are unable to establish, satisfactory immigration status. The bill would direct the State Department of Health Care Services to seek any necessary federal approvals to obtain federal financial participation for these services, and would require that these services be provided with state-only funds only if federal financial participation is not available.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 27, with one not voting, and became law. [SB 75, passed the Assembly, 6/19/15; became law, 6/24/15]

83 September 2015: Kim Did Not Vote On Extending Eligibility For State Health Care Benefits To Undocumented Children

Kim Did Not Vote On Extending Eligibility For Medi-Cal Benefits To All Children Under The Age Of 19, Regardless Of Immigration Status. In September 2015, Kim did not vote on: “Requir[ing] individuals under 19 years of age enrolled in restricted-scope Medi-Cal at the time the director makes the above-described determination to be enrolled in the full scope of Medi-Cal benefits, if otherwise eligible, pursuant to an eligibility and enrollment plan, as specified. […] the California Legislature has extended eligibility for full-scope Medi-Cal benefits to all children in California, regardless of immigration status.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 23, with 5 not voting, and became law. [SB 4, passed the Assembly, 9/11/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Kim Did Not Vote On Requiring The State To Apply For A Federal Waiver Allowing Undocumented Individuals To Receive California Qualified Health Benefit Plan

Kim Did Not Vote On Requiring The California Health Exchange To Apply For A Federal Waiver To Allow Undocumented Individuals To Obtain Health Care Coverage. In May 2016, Kim did not vote on: “Requir[ing] the Exchange [the California Health Benefit Exchange] to apply to the United States Department of Health and Human Services for a waiver to allow individuals who are not eligible to obtain health coverage through the Exchange because of their immigration status to obtain coverage from the Exchange.” The bill passed the Assembly 55 to 20, with 5 not voting, and became law. [SB 10, passed the Assembly, 5/31/16; became law, 6/10/16]

SB 10 Required Health Insurance Issuers To Offer Qualified Health Care Plans Through The California Health Exchange To Undocumented Individuals Once The Federal Waiver Had Been Granted. “The bill would require the Exchange, after that waiver has been granted, to require an issuer that offers a qualified health plan in the individual market through the Exchange to concurrently offer a California qualified health benefit plan, as specified, to these individuals.” [SB 10, Chaptered Text, 6/10/16]

Employment

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Employees From Using The E-Verify System To Check The Employment Authorization Status Of An Existing Employee Or Applicant

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Employees From Using The E-Verify System To Check The Employment Authorization Status Of An Existing Employee Or Applicant. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Expand[ing] the definition of an unlawful employment practice to prohibit an employer or any other person or entity from using the E-Verify system at a time or in a manner not required by a specified federal law or not authorized by a federal agency memorandum of understanding to check the employment authorization status of an existing employee or an applicant who has not received an offer of employment, except as required by federal law or as a condition of receiving federal funds.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 51 to 26, with 3 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 622, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/4/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Kim Voted Against A Resolution Urging The Federal Government To Investigate The Alleged Misuse Of The H1-B Visa Program

Kim Voted Against A Resolution Urging The Federal Government To Investigate The Alleged Misuse Of The H1-B Visa Program. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Urg[ing] the United States Department of Labor and the Congress of the United States to investigate alleged misuse of the H1-B Visa program.” The bill passed the Assembly 49 to 20, with 11 not voting, but died on the Senate inactive file. [AJR 12, passed the Assembly 6/29/15]

Civil Rights

84 Kim Voted Against Allowing Undocumented Children To Recover Civil Damages Under Any Applicable Law

Kim Voted Against A Bill Allowing Undocumented Children To Recover Civil Damages Under Any Applicable Law. In July 2015, Kim voted against: “Provid[ing] that the immigration status of a minor child seeking recovery under any applicable law is irrelevant to the issues of liability or remedy and would prohibit discovery or other inquiry in a civil action or proceeding into a minor child’s immigration status, with specified exceptions.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 56 to 21, with 3 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 560, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 7/16/15; became law, 8/10/15]

State Resources

Kim Did Not Vote On Establishing A Statewide Director Of Immigrant Integration For Developing Reports On Programs Serving Immigrants

Kim Did Not Vote On Establishing A Statewide Director Of Immigrant Integration For The Purpose Of Developing A Comprehensive Statewide Report On Programs Serving Immigrants. In June 2015, Kim voted did not vote on: “Establish[ing] the Statewide Director of Immigrant Integration in the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, appointed by the Governor, for the purpose of developing a comprehensive statewide report on programs and services that serve immigrants and programs and services currently managed by a state agency or department to support California immigrants.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 26, with 2 not voting, and became law. [SB 84, passed the Assembly, 6/19/15; became law, 6/24/15]

Kim Voted Against Requiring Certain State Institutions Of Higher Education To Create Campus Resources Centers To Assist DREAMers

Kim Voted Against Requiring California Community Colleges And The California State University Systems To Create Campus Resources Centers To Assist DREAMers. In June 201, Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] the California Community Colleges and the California State University, and would request the University of California, to create Dream Resource Centers on their campuses, as specified, to assist certain students by streamlining access to all available financial aid and academic opportunities for those students. The bill would require each campus of the California Community Colleges and the California State University that is not required to have a Dream Resource Center to ensure that it has a designated staff person who is knowledgeable in available financial aid, services, and academic opportunities for all students meeting specified requirements , including undocumented students.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 23, with 5 not voting, but, in the latest action, died on the Senate inactive file. [AB 1366, passed the Assembly, 6/31/15; died on Senate inactive file, 11/30/16]

Pathway To Citizenship

Kim Did Not Support A Path To Legal Citizenship For Undocumented Immigrants, Despite Being An Immigrant Turned U.S. Citizen Herself

2014: Kim Supported A Path To Legal Residency But Not Citizenship. “Quirk-Silva supports a path to citizenship for those in the country illegally, while Kim supports a path to legal residency but not citizenship.” [Orange County Register, 5/18/14]

Kim Was Born In South Korea And Moved To Guam As A Child. “Kim was born in South Korea, moved with her family to Guam as a child, graduated from high school in Hawaii, and became a U.S. citizen when she was 21.” [Orange County Register, 3/8/14]

85 Kim Graduated High School In Hawaii. “Kim was born in South Korea, moved with her family to Guam as a child, graduated from high school in Hawaii, and became a U.S. citizen when she was 21.” [Orange County Register, 3/8/14]

Kim Became A U.S. Citizen When She Was 21 Years Old. “Kim was born in South Korea, moved with her family to Guam as a child, graduated from high school in Hawaii, and became a U.S. citizen when she was 21.” [Orange County Register, 3/8/14]

Jury Duty

Kim Indicated She Would Have Voted Against Allowing Noncitizen Residents On Juries

2014: Kim Indicated She Would Have Voted Against A Bill Allowing Noncitizen Permanent Residents On Juries. “Quirk-Silva backed bills to allow noncitizen permanent residents on juries and to prohibit law enforcement from detaining people for immigration issues if they would otherwise be freed. Kim said she'd have voted against both measures.” [Orange County Register, 5/18/14]

State Immigration Enforcement

Kim Indicated She Would Have Voted Against Prohibiting Law Enforcement From Detaining Individuals For Immigration Issues When They Would Have Otherwise Been Freed

2014: Kim Indicated She Would Have Voted Against A Bill Prohibiting Law Enforcement From Detaining Individuals For Immigration Issues When They Would Have Otherwise Been Freed. “Quirk-Silva backed bills to allow noncitizen permanent residents on juries and to prohibit law enforcement from detaining people for immigration issues if they would otherwise be freed. Kim said she'd have voted against both measures.” [Orange County Register, 5/18/14]

86 Labor

Items of Interest

 In 2016, Kim voted against increasing the statewide minimum wage to $15 per hour.

 In 2014, Kim criticized her Democratic opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, for voting to increase the minimum wage.

 In 2014, Kim called raising the minimum wage a “job killer.”

 Kim voted against requiring an employer to pay at least twice the regular rate of pay to employees working on family holidays.

 Kim voted against extending retaliation protections to employees that have a family member who issued a complaint against an employer.

 Kim voted against prohibiting an employer from requiring an employee to agree to waive any legal right for employment law violations.

 Kim did not vote on expanding unpaid family and medical leave coverage.

 Kim voted to require state agencies to give preference to homeless and formerly incarcerated youths when hiring for internships and student assistant positions.

Wage Issues

Minimum Wage

2016: Kim Voted Against Increasing The Statewide Minimum Wage To $15 Per Hour

Kim Voted Against Increasing The Statewide Minimum Wage To $15 Per Hour By 2022. In March 2016, Kim voted against: “Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the minimum wage for all industries shall not be less than the amounts set forth in this subdivision, except when the scheduled increases in paragraphs (1) and (2) are temporarily suspended under subdivision (d). […] (F) From January 1, 2022, and until adjusted by subdivision (c)—fifteen dollars ($15) per hour.” The bill passed the Assembly 48 to 26, with 5 not voting, and became law. [SB 3, passed the Assembly, 3/31/16; became law, 4/4/16]

2014: Kim Criticized Her Democratic Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Who Voted To Increase The Minimum Wage

2014: Kim Criticized Her Democratic Opponent, Sharon Quirk-Silva, Who Voted To Increase The Minimum Wage. “Kim also criticized Quirk-Silva's votes to increase minimum wage and to allow transgender students to use the bathroom of their choice.” [Orange County Register, 10/12/14]

2014: Kim Called Raising The Minimum Wage A “Job Killer”

2014: Kim Called Raising The Minimum Wage A “Job Killer.” “Distinctions between Kim and Quirk-Silva often mirror the basic GOP vs. Democrats divide. For example, while both list the economy and job creation as priorities, Quirk-Silva voted to increase the minimum wage while Kim said she opposes the move. ‘The minimum 87 wage is meant for entry-level jobs, not careers, and should be set by business and employment conditions in the local area,’ Kim said, calling the pay hike a ‘job killer.’” [Orange County Register, 3/8/14]

Kim Voted Against Requiring An Employer To Pay At Least Twice The Regular Rate Of Pay To Employees Working On Family Holidays

Kim Voted Against Requiring An Employer To Pay At Least Twice The Regular Rate Of Pay To Employees At Retail And Grocery Establishments Working On A Family Holiday. In August 2016, Kim voted against: “Enact[ing] the Double Pay on the Holiday Act of 2016, which would require an employer to pay at least 2 times the regular rate of pay to employees at retail and grocery store establishments, as defined, except employees in specified categories, for work on a family holiday, as defined.” The Assembly did not concur with Senate amendments 31 to 37, with 12 not voting. [AB 67, Senate amendments failed in Assembly, 8/31/16]

Employee Protections

Kim Voted Against Extending Retaliation Protections To Employees That Have A Family Member Who Issued A Complaint Against An Employer

Kim Voted Against Extending Retaliation Protections To Employees That Have A Family Member Who Issued A Complaint Against An Employer. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Extend[ing] the protections of these provisions [protecting employees or an applicant from being discharged or having adverse action, discrimination, or retaliation directed at them by an employer for making a bona fide complaint], as specified, to an employee who is a family member of a person who engaged in, or was perceived to engage in, the protected conduct or make a complaint protected by these provisions. This bill would define terms for the purpose of these provisions.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 53 to 25, with 2 not voting, and became law. [AB 1509, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/4/15; became law, 10/11/15]

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting An Employer From Requiring An Employee To Agree To Waive Any Legal Right For Employment Law Violations

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting An Employer From Requiring An Employee To Agree To Waive Any Legal Right For Employment Law Violations. In August 2015, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] any person from requiring another person, as a condition of employment, to agree to the waiver of any legal right, penalty, forum, or procedure for any employment law violations. The bill would prohibit a person from threatening, retaliating against, or discriminating against another person based on a refusal to agree to such waiver, and would provide that any such waiver required from an employee or potential employee as a condition of employment or continued employment is unconscionable, against public policy, and unenforceable.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 46 to 31, with 3 not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 465, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/27/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/11/15]

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting An Employer From Seeking Salary History Information About An Applicant For Employment

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting An Employer From Seeking Salary History Information About An Applicant For Employment. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] an employer from seeking salary history information about an applicant for employment, except as otherwise provided. The bill would specify that a violation of its provisions would not be subject to the misdemeanor provision.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 42 to 33, with 5 not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 1017, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/3/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/11/15]

Paid Leave

88 Kim Did Not Vote On Expanding Unpaid Family And Medical Leave Coverage

Kim Did Not Vote On Expanding Unpaid Family And Medical Leave Coverage. In September 2015, Kim did not vote on: “Expanding the persons and purposes for which leave is required to be provided under the act [Moore- Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act, which makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to refuse to grant a request by an eligible employee to take up to 12 workweeks of unpaid protected family or medical leave]. The bill would redefine the term ‘child’ to include a biological, adopted, or foster son or daughter, a stepchild, a legal ward, a son or daughter of a domestic partner, or a person to whom the employee stands in loco parentis, and would remove the restriction on age or dependent status. The bill would expand the definition of leave with regard to caring for persons with a serious health condition to also include leave to care for a grandparent, grandchild, sibling, or domestic partner who has a serious health condition. The bill would include a parent-in-law in the definition of ‘parent.’” The bill passed the Assembly 41 to 30, with 9 not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [SB 406, passed the Assembly, 9/11/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/11/15]

State Employment

Kim Voted To Require State Agencies To Give Preference To Homeless And Formerly Incarcerated Youths When Hiring For Internships And Student Assistant Positions

Kim Voted To Require State Agencies To Give Preference To Homeless And Formerly Incarcerated Youths When Hiring For Internships And Student Assistant Positions. Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] state agencies, when hiring for internships and student assistant positions, also to give preference to homeless youth and formerly incarcerated youth, as defined.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 59 to 18, with 3 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1840, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/24/16; became law, 9/21/16]

89 LGBT Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim opposed gay marriage.

 Kim did not believe gay individuals were born with their sexual orientation.

 Kim did not believe transgender individuals were born with their gender identities.

 Kim did not vote on a resolution urging the United States Congress to amend the Civil Rights Act to include protections for the LGBT community.

 Kim voted against prohibiting state agencies from requiring employees to travel to any state with laws allowing discrimination against the LGBT community.

 Kim voted against prohibiting state agencies from entering contracts exceeding $100,000 with companies that discriminate based on gender identity.

 Kim voted to require charitable organizations seeking to participate in the state employees’’ charitable giving program to certify their nondiscrimination compliance.

 In 2014, Kim made her opponent’s support of a transgender bathroom bill a central issue in her campaign.

 In 2014, Kim criticized at transgender bathroom bill, saying it did not “represent the values” of the district and added an “additional burden” to schools.

 Kim voted for requiring public restrooms with only one toilet to be identified as an all-gender restroom.

 Kim did not vote on replacing gendered spousal terms with gender-neutral language.

 Kim voted against requiring the state to access whether local educational agencies have provided information on existing resources for LGBT students.

Marriage Equality

Orange County Register: Kim Opposed Gay Marriage

Kim Opposed Gay Marriage. “Kim says transgender individuals ‘deserve to be respected.’ But she doesn't believe they were born with their gender identities or that gays were born with their sexual orientation. Kim also opposes gay marriage.” [Orange County Register, 8/10/14]

Nature vs. Nurture

Orange County Register: Kim Did Not Believe That Gay Individuals Were Born With Their Sexual Orientation

90 Kim Did Not Believe Gay Individuals Were Born With Their Sexual Orientation. “Kim says transgender individuals "deserve to be respected." But she doesn't believe they were born with their gender identities or that gays were born with their sexual orientation. Kim also opposes gay marriage.” [Orange County Register, 8/10/14]

Orange County Register: Kim Did Not Believe Transgender Individuals Were Born With Their Gender Identities

Orange County Register: Kim Did Not Believe That Transgender Individuals Were Born With Their Gender Identities. “Kim says transgender individuals "deserve to be respected." But she doesn't believe they were born with their gender identities or that gays were born with their sexual orientation. Kim also opposes gay marriage.” [Orange County Register, 8/10/14]

Discrimination

Kim Did Not Vote On A Resolution Urging The United States Congress To Amend The Civil Rights Act To Include Protections For The LGBT Community

Kim Did Not Vote On A Resolution Urging The United States Congress To Amend The Civil Rights Act To Include Protections On The Basis Of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, And Sex. In June and August 2016, Kim did not vote on: “AJR 45, Chiu. Civil rights: the Equality Act. This act would urge the United States Congress to enact the Equality Act of 2015, which would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include protections on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, and sex for, among other things, employment, housing, public education, and public accommodations.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 11, with 17 not voting, and the Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 55 to 11, with 14 not voting. The bill became law by the Secretary of State. [AJR 45, passed the Assembly, 6/23/16; Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/24/16; became law, 9/10/16]

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting State Agencies From Requiring Employees To Travel To Any State With Laws Allowing Discrimination Against The LGBT Community

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting State Agencies From Requiring Employees To Travel To Any State With Any Laws Allowing Discrimination Based On Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Or Gender Expression. In May and August 2016, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] a state agency and the Legislature from requiring any of its employees, officers, or members to travel to, or approving a request for state-funded or state-sponsored travel to, any state that, after June 26, 2015, has enacted a law that voids or repeals, or has the effect of voiding or repealing, existing state or local protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression or has enacted a law that authorizes or requires discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, as specified, subject to certain exceptions.” The bill passed the Assembly 54 to 21, with 5 not voting, and the Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 56 to 21, with 3 not voting. The bill became law. [AB 1887, passed the Assembly, 5/9/16; Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/23/16; became law, 9/27/16]

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting State Agencies From Entering Contracts Exceeding $100,000 With Companies That Discriminate Based On Gender Identity

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting State Agencies From Entering Contracts For The Acquisition Of Goods Or Services Of $100,000 Or More With Companies That Discriminate Based On Gender Identity. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] a state agency from entering into contracts for the acquisition of goods or services of $100,000 or more with a contractor that discriminates between employees on the basis of gender identity in the provision of benefits, as specified. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state- mandated local program.” The bill passed the Assembly 53 to 24, with 3 not voting, and became law. [SB 703, passed the Assembly, 9/2/15; became law, 10/7/15] 91

Kim Voted To Require Charitable Organizations Seeking To Participate In The State Employees’ Charitable Giving Program To Certify Their Nondiscrimination Compliance

Kim Voted For A Bill That Would Require Charitable Organizations Seeking To Participate In The State Employees’ Charitable Giving Program To Certify Their Compliance With Existing Nondiscrimination Laws. In May 2015, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] a charitable organization seeking to participate in the state employees' charitable giving program (program) to provide a statement to the program administrator certifying that it complies with existing civil rights and nondiscrimination laws.” The Assembly passed the bill 62 to 7, with 11 not voting. [AB 1050, passed the Assembly, 5/26/15]

Kim Voted For The Final Version Of The Bill, Which Omitted Nondiscrimination Requirements. “This bill would, when the request for a permanent variance pertains to a conveyance covered by the elevator safety orders, require the applicant to provide the required notice regarding the hearing to the local union representing elevator workers and to those workers who will be performing the tasks pursuant to the proposed variance, or their authorized representative. The bill would grant party status at the hearing to those workers or their authorized representative upon their request to the board.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 52 to 28, but the bill was vetoed by the Governor. [AB 1050, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/30/16; vetoed by Governor, 9/27/16]

Bathroom Bills

2014: Kim Criticized A Transgender Bathroom Bill, Making It A Central Issue During Her Campaign

2014: Kim Made Her Opponent’s Support Of A Transgender Bathroom Bill A Central Issue In Her Campaign

Kim Made Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk-Silva’s Support Of A Transgender Bathroom Bill A Central Issue In Her Campaign. “Kim's victory also shows that the party doesn't have to sacrifice its conservative ideology to win votes. Her campaign has given equal weight to fiscal and social issues and made Quirk-Silva's support for the new transgender bathroom law a central issue in the race.” [Orange County Register, 9/18/14]

2014: Kim Criticized A Transgender Bathroom Bill, Saying It Did Not “Represent The Values” Of The District And Added An “Additional Burden” To Schools

October 2014: Kim Attacked A Transgender Bathroom Bill, Saying It Did Not “Represent The Values” Of The Community And Added An “Additional Burden” To Schools. “California Assembly candidate Young Kim hopes to win votes in one of the state's tightest races by at-tacking a new law requiring schools to allow transgender students to use bathrooms of their choice and participate in sports by their gender identity rather than their anatomical gender. ‘That doesn't represent the values of this community,’ the Fullerton Republican said. She also expressed concerns about practical repercussions. ‘This bill adds a giant additional burden to our schools.’” [Orange County Register, 8/10/14]

Quirk-Silva Contended That Kim Was Preying On Misunderstanding And Fear For Political Gain. “Assembly District 65 incumbent Sharon Quirk-Silva, D-Fullerton, said Kim is preying on misunderstanding and fear for political gain. ‘They're trying to present is as a divisive, fearful issue,’ said Quirk-Silva, who backed the law in a largely party-line vote.” [Orange County Register, 8/10/14]

May 2014: Kim Criticized That A Transgender Bathroom Bill Did Not Reflect The Values Of The District. “Among other policy differences, Quirk-Silva supported a bill that allows transgender students to use the bathroom

92 of their choice in public schools, while Kim criticizes the measure as not reflecting the values of the district.” [Orange County Register, 5/18/14]

Kim Voted To Require Public Restrooms With Only One Toilet To Be Identified As An All-Gender Restroom

Kim Voted To Require Public Restrooms With Only One Toilet To Be Identified As An All-Gender Restroom. In May and August 2016, Kim voted for: “Requir[ing] all single-user toilet facilities in any business establishment, place of public accommodation, or government agency to be identified as all-gender toilet facilities, as specified. The bill would authorize inspectors, building officials, or other local officials responsible for code enforcement to inspect for compliance with these provisions during any inspection.” The bill passed the Assembly 55 to 19, with 6 not voting, and the Assembly concurred 57 to 18, with 5 not voting. The bill became law. [AB 1732, passed the Assembly, 5/9/16; Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/22/16; became law, 9/29/16]

Gender Neutral Government Documents

Kim Did Not Vote On Replacing Gendered Spousal Terms With Gender-Neutral Language

Kim Did Not Vote On Replacing References To “Husband” And “Wife” Or “Married Persons” With References To A “Spouse” Or “Registered Domestic Partner.” Kim did not vote on: “Replac[ing] references to a ‘husband’ or ‘wife’ with references to a ‘spouse,’ would define “spouse” as including ‘registered domestic partner,’ and would make other conforming and related changes.” The bill passed the Assembly 63 to 1, with 16 not voting, and became law. [SB 1005, passed the Assembly, 6/16/16; became law, 7/1/16]

Student Resources

Kim Voted Against Requiring The State To Assess Whether Local Educational Agencies Have Provided Information On Existing Resources For LGBT Students

Kim Voted Against Requiring The Department Of Education To Assess Whether Local Educational Agencies Have Provided Information On Existing Resources For LGBT Students And Questioning Pupils. In June and September 2015, Kim voted against: “[A bill] requir[ing] the department [State Department of Education] to also assess whether the local educational agency has provided to certificated schoolsite employees who serve pupils in any of grades 7 to 12, inclusive, information on existing schoolsite and community resources related to the support of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning pupils, as specified.” The bill passed the Assembly 59 to 15, with 6 not voting, and the Assembly concurred Senate amendments, 58 to 18, with 4 not voting. The bill became law. [AB 827, passed the Assembly, 6/4/15; Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/3/15; became law, 10/7/15]

93 Native American Issues

Items of Interest

 From 2015 to 2016, Kim accepted $23,500 from Native American tribes.

Campaign Finance

2015-2016: Kim Accepted $23,500 From Native American Tribes. [California Secretary of State, Contributions Search, accessed 3/1/18]

Kim’s Contributions From Native American Tribes (2015-2016) Date Contributor Amount 7/6/16 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians $1,500.00 2/17/16 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians $1,500.00 3/5/15 Pala Band of Mission Indians PAC $3,000.00 12/1/15 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $1,200.00 8/31/15 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $3,100.00 2/25/15 Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians $4,100.00 8/31/15 Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rinco Reservation $1,500.00 6/15/15 San Manuel Band of Mission Indians $2,500.00 2/20/15 Viejas Tribal Government $4,100.00 9/1/15 Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation $1,000.00 TOTAL $23,500.00 [California Secretary of State, Contributions Search, accessed 3/1/18]

94 Seniors’ Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim voted against an omnibus social services budget bill that increased the amount of aid paid under the state supplementary program for the aged, blind, and disabled by 2.76 percent.

 Kim voted against prohibiting continuing care retirement facilities from changing residents a monthly fee once a unit has been permanently vacated by the resident.

 Kim voted against a budget that restored $1.9 million to the “Meals on Wheels” program.

Social Services

Kim Voted Against An Omnibus Social Services Budget Bill That Increased The Amount Of Aid Paid Under The State Supplementary Program For The Aged, Blind, And Disabled

Kim Voted Against An Omnibus Social Services Budget Bill That Increased The Amount Of Aid Paid Under The State Supplementary Program For The Aged, Blind, And Disabled By 2.76 Percent. In June 2016, Kim voted against: “Increas[ing] he amount of aid paid under SSP that is in effect on December 31, 2016, less the federal benefit portion received, by 2.76%. The bill would instead provide that the continuous appropriation would not be made for purposes of implementing these provisions.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 54 to 24, with 2 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 1603, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 6/16/16; became law, 6/27/16]

Retirement Facilities

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Continuing Care Retirement Facilities From Charging Monthly Fees Once Units Have Been Permanently Vacated By The Resident

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting Continuing Care Retirement Facilities From Charging Residents A Monthly Fee Once A Unit Has Been Permanently Vacated By The Resident. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Mak[ing] corresponding changes to require a continuing care contract to contain a statement that a provider is prohibited from charging the resident or his or her estate a monthly fee once a unit has been permanently vacated by the resident, unless the fee is part of an equity interest contract.” The bill passed the Assembly 53 to 26, with one not voting, but was vetoed by the Governor. [SB 475, passed the Assembly, 9/8/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/11/15]

Meals On Wheels

Kim Voted Against A Budget That Restored $1.9 Million To The “Meals On Wheels” Program

Kim Voted Against A Budget That Restored $1.9 Million To The “Meals On Wheels” Program. Kim voted against: “Amend[ing] he 2015 Act, AB 123 (Budget Committee) of the current legislative session and SB 97, Chapter 11, Statutes of 2015, to make technical amendments and corrections to budget provisions to adequately reflect the agreement reached by the Legislature and the Governor. Corrects omissions, clarifies previously- ambiguous provisions, provides necessary statutory language for budgetary allocations, and corrects amounts that were previously cited incorrectly. Specifically, this bill: […] Restores an unintentional reduction of $1.9 million General Fund for the Congregate Nutrition ‘Meals on Wheels’ program.” [SB 101, passed the Assembly, 9/11/15; Assembly Floor Analysis, 9/11/15; became law, 9/22/15] 95 State Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim wanted to immediately pull funding for a California bullet train.

California Bullet Train

Kim Wanted To Pull Funding For A California Bullet Train

2014: Kim Wanted To Immediately Pull Funding For A California Bullet Train. “Bullet train: Kim wants to pull the plug on funding immediately while Quirk-Silva likes the idea but wants ‘to make sure the money we are being asked to spend is being done so in a responsible manner.’” [Orange County Register, 10/12/14]

96 Tax Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim opposed state and federal gas tax increases.

 Kim voted to impose an additional tax on life insurance policies.

 Kim did not vote on imposing a tax on every distributor of medical marijuana.

 Kim did not vote on authorizing counties to impose a tax upon specified cannabis-related activities.

 Kim voted against authorizing local governments to impose a tax on cigarettes and tobacco products.

 Kim voted against raising license application fees for businesses selling cigarettes or tobacco products.

Gas Tax

2018: Kim Opposed A Potential Increase In The Federal Gas Tax

2018: Kim Opposed A Potential Increase In The Federal Gas Tax. “‘I stand against the current attempt to increase federal gas taxes,’ said Young Kim. ‘As we have seen in California, raising the gas tax increases costs on hard working men and women that are already struggling to get by. Any increase, even incremental, will hurt Californians of all backgrounds and continue to raise the already high cost of living in Southern California.’ Several Media outlets have reported that President Donald Trump voiced support for a 25 cent a gallon increase in gas and diesel taxes in order to fund his recent infrastructure proposal.” [Young Kim for Congress, press release, accessed 2/22/18]

2014: Kim Opposed A Gas Tax Increase

Kim Opposed A Gas Tax Increase. “Gas Tax: Both [Quirk-Silva and Kim] say they oppose an increase.” [Orange County Register, 10/12/14]

Life Insurance Tax

Kim Voted To Impose An Additional Tax On Life Insurance Policies

Kim Voted To Impose An Additional Tax On Life Insurance Policies. In September 2015, Kim voted for: “Authoriz[ing] the commissioner to impose an annual assessment on each insurance company, based on the company’s gross annual life insurance premium written by the insurer in California during the immediately preceding year, thereby imposing a tax.” The bill passed the Assembly 78 to 0, with 2 not voting, and became law. [SB 696, passed the Assembly, 9/8/15; became law, 10/8/15]

Marijuana Tax

Kim Did Not Vote On Imposing A Tax On Every Distributor Of Medical Marijuana

Kim Did Not Vote On Imposing A Tax On Every Distributor Of Medical Marijuana. In June 2016, Kim did not vote on: “Impos[ing] a tax in specified amounts on every distributor upon all medical cannabis and medical 97 cannabis products distributed to a dispensary in this state, as specified. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization to administer and collect the tax pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Fee Collection Procedures Law.” The bill passed the Assembly 60 to 12, with 8 not voting, but in the latest action, the Senate Appropriations committee placed the bill on suspense file. [AB 2243, passed the Assembly, 6/2/16]

Kim Did Not Vote On Authorizing Counties To Impose A Tax Upon Specified Cannabis-Related Activity

Kim Did Not Vote On Authorizing Counties To Impose A Tax Upon Specified Cannabis-Related Activity. In September 2015, Kim voted did not vote on: “Authoriz[ing] counties to impose a tax upon specified cannabis- related activity.” The bill passed the Assembly 58 to 13, with 9 not voting, and became law. [SB 643, passed the Assembly, 9/11/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Tobacco Taxes

Kim Voted Against Authorizing Local Governments To Impose A Tax On Cigarettes And Tobacco Products

Kim Voted Against Authorizing Local Governments To Impose A Tax On Cigarettes And Tobacco Products. In March 2016, Kim voted against: “Authoriz[ing], on and after January 1, 2017, the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to impose a tax on the privilege of distributing cigarettes and tobacco products in the county or city and county, including within an incorporated city within the county, and would make conforming changes.” The bill passed the Assembly 46 to 27, with 6 not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 10, passed the Assembly, 3/3/16; vetoed by Governor, 5/4/16]

Kim Voted Against Raising License Application Fees For Businesses Selling Cigarettes Or Tobacco Products

Kim Voted Against Raising License Application Fees For Businesses Selling Cigarettes Or Tobacco Products. In March 2016, Kim voted against: “Rais[ing] the fees described [requiring a wholesaler or distributor that commences business selling or distributing cigarettes or tobacco products, or that commences doing so at a new or different place of business in the state, to apply for a license accompanied by a required fee of $1,000 for each location] to $1,200.” The bill passed the Assembly 48 to 26, with 5 not voting, and became law. [AB 11, passed the Assembly, 3/3/16; became law, 5/4/16]

98 Technology Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim twice voted against allowing state to create rules and regulations for digital currency.

Cryptocurrency

Kim Twice Voted Against Allowing The State To Create Rules And Regulations For Digital Currency

Kim Voted Against Allowing The Commissioner Of Business Oversight To Create Rules And Regulations Related To Digital Currency. In June 2015, Kim voted against: “Enact[ing] he Digital Currency Business Enrollment Program, to be administrated by the Commissioner of Business Oversight, who would be granted authority to make rules and regulations for this purpose. The bill would prescribe various definitions in this regard and would define digital currency as a digital representation of value that can be digitally traded and is used to facilitate the sale, purchase, and exchange of goods, services, or other digital representations of value, except as specified. The bill would define digital currency business as offering or providing the service of storing, transmitting, exchanging, or issuing digital currency, subject to various exceptions.” The bill passed the Assembly 55 to 22, with 3 not voting, but was held in Senate committee without further action. [AB 1326, passed the Assembly, 6/3/15]

The Bill Would Prohibit The Use Of Digital Currency Without Enrolling With The State. “The bill would prohibit a person from engaging in the digital currency business without enrolling in the program and would prohibit the conduct of digital currency business through an unenrolled agent. The bill would require a person seeking enrollment to pay a nonrefundable fee of up to $5,000, not to exceed the reasonable costs of enrolling a person in the program, and would require the person to provide the commissioner specified personal and business information in a form and manner prescribed by the commissioner.” [AB 1326, Amended Assembly text, 6/1/15]

Kim Voted Against The Bill In The Assembly Banking And Finance Committee. The bill passed the Assembly Banking and Finance committee 8 to 2, with 2 not voting. [AB 1326, passed the Assembly Banking and Finance Committee, 4/27/15]

99 Transportation Issues

Items of Interest

 In 2015, Kim authored a bill prohibiting the state from seeking or providing funding for new toll lanes in Orange County without a two-thirds vote from the regional transportation authority.

 Kim voted against prohibiting a pedestrian or cyclists from being charged on toll bridges.

 Kim voted against expanding the state’s authority to review and approve toll lane applications submitted by regional transportation agencies.

 Kim voted to authorize motorcyclist to drive between rows of stopped or moving vehicles in the same lane.

 Kim voted against prohibiting the operation of a freight train without at least two crewmembers.

Toll Roads

2015: Kim Authored A Bill Prohibiting The State From Funding New Toll Lanes In Orange County Without A Two-Thirds Vote From The Regional Transportation Authority

2015: Kim Authored A Bill Prohibiting The Department Of Transportation From Seeking Or Providing Funding For A Toll Lane Without A Two-Thirds Vote Of The Orange County Transportation Authority. “Existing law authorizes certain toll facilities on public highways. Existing law creates the Orange County Transportation Authority with various powers and duties. This bill would prohibit the Department of Transportation from seeking or providing funding for a toll lane on a public highway within the boundaries of the County of Orange unless the project is approved by a 2/3 vote of the Orange County Transportation Authority.” The bill failed in the Assembly Transportation Committee 2 to 9, with 5 not voting. [AB 1459, Authored, 2/27/15; failed in committee, 4/20/15]

Orange County Register: Kim Authored A Bill That Would Override Cal-Trans’ Authority And Block New Toll Facilities In Orange County Unless Approved By Two-Thirds Of County Voters. “The proposed state legislation by freshman Assemblywoman Young Kim, R-Fullerton, aims to override Caltrans' authority and block all new toll facilities on Orange County roads unless approved by two-thirds of county voters.” [Orange County Register, 3/3/15]

HEADLINE: Assemblywoman’s Bill May Ban I-405 Tolls. [Orange County Register, 3/3/15]

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting A Pedestrian Or Cyclist From Being Charged On A Toll Bridge

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting A Pedestrian Or Cyclist From Being Charged On Toll Bridges. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing] a toll from being imposed on the passage of a pedestrian or bicycle over these various toll bridges.” The Assembly concurred with Senate Amendments 65 to 13, with 2 not voting, and became law. [AB 40, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/9/15; became law, 10/7/15]

Kim Voted Against Expanding The State’s Authority To Review And Approve Toll Lane Applications Submitted By Regional Transportation Agencies

100 Kim Voted Against A Bill Expanding The California Transportation Commission’s Authority To Review And Approve Toll Lane Applications Submitted By Regional Transportation Agencies. Kim voted against: “Delet[ing] the requirement that the facilities be consistent with the established standards, requirements, and limitations that apply to specified facilities and would instead require the commission to establish eligibility criteria set forth in guidelines for the development and operation of the facilities and provide for the review and approval by the commission [California Transportation Commission] of each proposed toll facility pursuant to those eligibility criteria. The bill would require toll facilities approved by the commission on or after January 1, 2016, to be subject to specified minimum requirements, including those relating to toll facility revenues. The bill would authorize a regional transportation agency or the state, as applicable, to issue bonds, refunding bonds, or bond anticipation notes backed by revenues generated from the facilities. The bill would delete the requirement that the commission conduct at least one public hearing in northern California and one in southern California for each eligible application and would instead require the commission to conduct at least one public hearing at or near the proposed toll facility.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 58 to 20, with 2 not voting, and became law. [AB 194, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/11/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Safety Regulations

Kim Voted To Authorize Motorcyclists To Drive Between Rows Of Stopped Or Moving Vehicles In The Same Lane

Kim Voted For A Bill Authorizing Two-Wheeled Motorcycles To Drive Between Rows Of Stopped Or Moving Vehicles In The Same Lane. In August 2016, Kim voted for: “Defin[ing] ‘lane splitting’ as driving a motorcycle, that has 2 wheels in contact with the ground, between rows of stopped or moving vehicles in the same lane, as specified.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 74 to 0, with six not voting, and became law. [AB 51, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 8/4/16; became law, 8/19/16]

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting The Operation Of A Freight Train Without At Least Two Crewmembers

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting The Operation Of A Freight Train Without At Least Two Crewmembers. Kim voted against: “Prohibit[ing], on and after February 1, 2016, a train or light engine used in connection with the movement of freight, as specified, from being operated unless it has a crew consisting of at least 2 individuals. The bill would authorize the Public Utilities Commission to assess civil penalties against any person who willfully violates this provision, as specified.” The bill passed the Assembly 51 to 28, with one not voting, and became law. [SB 730, passed the Assembly, 8/20/15; became law, 9/8/15]

101 Veterans’ Issues

Items of Interest

 Kim authored a resolution urging the U.S. Congress to build a central VA hospital in Orange County for mental health care needs.

Health Care Facilities

Kim Authored A Resolution Urging The United States Congress To Build A Central VA Hospital In Orange County For Mental Health Care Needs

2016: Kim Authored A Resolution Urging The United States Congress To Build A Central VA Hospital In Orange County For Mental Health Care Needs. “Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of California, jointly, That the Legislature urges the Congress of the United States to support and build a central Veterans Affairs Hospital in Orange County for the mental health care needs of local veterans.” The bill passed the Assembly 75 to 0, with 4 not voting, and became law. [AJR 20, passed the Assembly, 4/11/16; became law, 7/11/16]

102 Women

Items of Interest

 The Planned Parenthood affiliates of California gave Kim a 67 percent rating.

 Kim voted against a resolution urging the federal government to express support for Planned Parenthood and a woman’s fundamental right to control her own reproductive decisions.

 Kim voted against prohibiting the deliberate recording of a confidential communication without consent, a bill stemming from videos involving Planned Parenthood employees.

 Kim voted against requiring licensed covered facilities to provide information about affordable family planning, abortion services, and prenatal care to clients.

 Kim voted toallow pregnant women to enroll or change an individual health care plan or policy as a result of pregnancy.

 Kim voted against prohibiting a requirement for primary care clinic that provide birth services to enter a written agreement to transfer a patient to a nearby hospital.

 Kim voted against requiring schools to provide reasonable accommodations for breast-feeding.

 Kim voted against enacting The Equal Pay for Equal Work Act, which would require an employer to submit a nondiscrimination program to the state.

 Kim voted to revise a provision prohibiting employers from paying employees wages less than other employees of the opposite sex for substantially similar work.

Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood Affiliates Of California Gave Kim A 67 Percent Rating

Planned Parenthood Affiliates Of California Gave Kim A 67 Percent Rating For Her Assembly Voting Record. [Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, 2016 Legislative Scorecard, accessed 2/7/18]

Kim Voted Against Urging The Federal Government To Express Support For Planned Parenthood And A Woman’s Fundamental Right To Control Her Own Reproductive Decisions

Kim Voted Against A Resolution Urging The President Of The United States And Congress To Express Support For Planned Parenthood And A Woman’s Fundamental Right To Control Her Own Reproductive Decisions. In January 2016, Kim voted against: “Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That the Assembly urges the President of the United States and the United States Congress to express their support for a woman’s fundamental right to control her own reproductive decisions, as well as their support for access to comprehensive reproductive health care, including the services provided by Planned Parenthood.” The resolution passed the Assembly 53 to 22. [HR 32, passed the Assembly, 1/19/16]

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting The Deliberate Recording Of A Confidential Communication Without Consent, A Bill That Stemmed From Videos Involving Planned Parenthood Employees

103 Kim Voted Against Prohibiting The Deliberate Recording Of A Confidential Communication Without Consent. In May 2016, Kim voted against: “A person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, uses an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per violation, or imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment.” The bill passed the Assembly 52 to 26, with 2 not voting, and the Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 52 to 26, with 2 not voting. The bill became law and became law. [AB 1671, passed the Assembly, 5/31/16; Senate amendments concurred in, 8/31/16; became law, 9/30/16]

Los Angeles Times: Videos Involving Planned Parenthood Employees Discussing Abortion Procedures Inspired AB 1671. “Distributing secret recordings involving healthcare conversations will become a crime in California in 2017, under a new law inspired by the high-profile case involving videos of Planned Parenthood employees discussing abortion procedures. […] Planned Parenthood, a sponsor of AB 1671, argued that the new law is necessary in the wake of the controversial videos taped by David Daleiden and other anti-abortion activists that purport to show Planned Parenthood employees illegally trafficking in fetal tissue.” [Los Angeles Times, 9/30/16]

Planned Parenthood Sponsored AB 1671. “Planned Parenthood, a sponsor of AB 1671, argued that the new law is necessary in the wake of the controversial videos taped by David Daleiden and other anti-abortion activists that purport to show Planned Parenthood employees illegally trafficking in fetal tissue.” [Los Angeles Times, 9/30/16]

Abortion & Family Planning

Kim Voted Against Requiring Licensed Covered Facilities To Provide Information About Affordable Family Planning, Abortion Services, And Prenatal Care To Clients

Kim Voted Against Requiring Licensed Covered Facilities To Provide Information About Affordable Family Planning, Programs, Abortion Services, And Prenatal Care To Clients. In May 2015, Kim voted against: “Enact[ing] the Reproductive FACT (Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency) Act, which would require a licensed covered facility, as defined, to disseminate a notice to all clients, as specified, stating, among other things, that California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services, prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible women. The bill would also require an unlicensed covered facility, as defined, to disseminate a notice to all clients, as specified, stating, among other things, that the facility is not licensed as a medical facility by the State of California.” The bill passed the Assembly 49 to 26, with 5 not voting, and became law. [AB 775, passed the Assembly, 5/26/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Sacramento Bee: NARAL Pro-Choice America, Planned Parenthood, And Black Women For Wellness Sponsored AB 775. “Los Angeles-based advocacy group Black Women for Wellness joined Harris and NARAL Pro-Choice California as sponsors of the bill, which was authored by Assemblyman David Chiu, D- San Francisco, and Assemblywoman Autumn Burke, D-Los Angeles.” [Sacramento Bee, 10/11/15]

Sacramento Bee: AB 775 Would Require That “Crisis Pregnancy Centers” Run By Anti-Abortion Organizations To Inform Clients Of California Public Programs That Offer Abortions. “The law would cover ‘crisis pregnancy centers’ run by anti-abortion organizations. […] The just-enacted legislation, however, requires that they inform clients of California public programs that do offer abortions, and that they supply their clients with a telephone number for the appropriate county social services office so the clients can find out if they qualify for those programs that include abortion services. Facilities that fail to obey the new law are subject to a $500 civil penalty for a first offense and a $1,000 penalty for each subsequent offense.” [Sacramento Bee, 10/11/15]

104

Kim Voted Against Prohibiting A Requirement For Primary Care Clinic That Provide Birth Services To Enter A Written Agreement To Transfer A Patient To A Nearby Hospital

Kim Voted Against A Bill To Prohibit A Requirement For Primary Care Clinics That Provide Birth Services To Enter A Written Agreement To Transfer A Patient To A Nearby Hospital. In May 2015, Kim voted against: “A licensed primary care clinic is not required to enter into a written transfer agreement pursuant to those provisions as a condition of licensure, except as provided for a primary care clinic that provides services as an alternative birth center, as specified. The bill would require a primary care clinic, except as specified, to send with each patient at the time of transfer, or in the case of an emergency, as promptly as possible, copies of all medical records related to the patient’s transfer, and would require the medical records to include, among other things, current medical findings and a brief summary of the course of treatment provided prior to the patient’s transfer. The bill would require the department to repeal related regulations.” The bill passed the Assembly 51 to 28, with one vote not recorded, and became public law. [AB 1177, passed the Assembly, 5/11/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Pre- And Post-Natal Care

Kim Voted To Allow Pregnant Women To Enroll Or Change An Individual Health Care Plan Or Policy As A Result Of Pregnancy

Kim Voted To Allow Pregnant Women To Enroll Or Change An Individual Health Care Plan Or Policy As A Result Of Pregnancy. In June 2015, Kim voted for a bill that: “Require[d] a health care service plan (plan) or health insurer (insurer) to allow an individual to enroll in or change an individual plan or policy as a result of pregnancy.” The bill passed the Assembly 66 to 10. In the latest action, the bill remained inactive in Senate committee. [AB 1102, passed the Assembly, 6/4/15; Assembly Committee on Health, AB 1102 Summary, 4/28/15]

Kim Voted Against Requiring Schools To Provide Reasonable Accommodations For Breast- Feeding

Kim Voted Against Requiring Schools To Provide Reasonable Accommodations For Breast-Feeding. Kim voted against: “Requir[ing] a school operated by a school district or a county office of education, the California School for the Deaf, the California School for the Blind, and a charter school to provide, only if there is at least one lactating pupil on the school campus, reasonable accommodations to a lactating pupil on a school campus to express breast milk, breast-feed an infant child, or address other needs related to breast-feeding. The bill would require that these reasonable accommodations include, but are not limited to, access to a private and secure room, other than a restroom, to express breast milk or breast-feed an infant child, permission to bring onto a school campus any equipment used to express breast milk, access to a power source for that equipment, and access to a place to safely store expressed breast milk. The bill would also require that a lactating pupil on a school campus be given a reasonable amount of time to accommodate the need to express breast milk or breast-feed an infant child.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 62 to 14, with 4 not voting, and the bill became law. [AB 302, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/3/15; became law, 10/9/15]

Equal Pay

Kim Voted Against Enacting The Equal Pay For Equal Work Act, Which Would Require An Employer To Submit A Nondiscrimination Program To The State

Kim Voted Against Enacting The Equal Pay For Equal Work Act, Which Would Require An Employer To Submit A Nondiscrimination Program To The State. In September 2015, Kim voted against: “Enact[ing] the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act of 2015. The bill would require an employer with 100 or more employees in state, as specified, and a contract of 30 days or more, prior to becoming a contractor or subcontractor with the state, to submit a nondiscrimination program to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and to submit periodic 105 reports no more than annually of its compliance with that program. The bill would authorize the department to require approval and certification of the program. The bill would permit the department to require an employer with fewer than 100 employees in state or a contract of less than 30 days to submit a nondiscrimination report. The bill would require the department to define an employee for these purposes. The bill would require the nondiscrimination program to include policies and procedures designed to ensure equal employment opportunities for all applicants and employees, an analysis of employment selection procedures, and a workforce analysis, as specified.” The Assembly concurred with Senate amendments 54 to 25, with one not voting, but the Governor vetoed. [AB 1354, Assembly concurred with Senate amendments, 9/8/15; vetoed by Governor, 10/11/15]

Kim Voted For Revising A Provision Prohibiting Employers From Paying Employees Wages Less Than Other Employees Of The Opposite Sex For Substantially Similar Work

Kim Voted For Revising A Provision Prohibiting Employers From Paying Employees Wages Less That Other Employees Of The Opposite Sex For Substantially Similar Work When Viewed As A Composite Of Skill, Effort, And Responsibility. In August 2015, Kim voted for: “Revis[ing] that prohibition [prohibiting an employer from paying an employee at wage rates less than the rates paid to employees of the opposite sex in the same establishment for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions] to eliminate the requirement that the wage differential be within the same establishment, and instead would prohibit an employer from paying any of its employees at wage rates less than those paid to employees of the opposite sex for substantially similar work, when viewed as a composite of skill, effort, and responsibility, as specified.” The bill passed the Assembly 76 to 2, with 2 not voting, and became law. [SB 358, passed the Assembly, 8/27/15; became law, 10/6/15]

106 Assembly Members Salaries – 2014 (Updated December 12, 2014)

Annual Annual Assembly Member District Assembly Member District Salary Salary Achadjian, Katcho 35th $97,197 Hernández, Roger 48th $97,197 Alejo, Luis A. 30th $97,197 Holden, Chris R. 41st $104,486 Allen, Travis 72nd $97,197 Irwin, Jacqui 44th $97,197 Atkins, Toni G. 78th $111,776 Jones, Brian W. 71st $97,197 Baker, Catharine B. 16th $97,197 Jones-Sawyer, Sr., Reginald B. 59th $97,197 Bigelow, Franklin E. 5th $97,197 Kim, Young O. 65th $95,291 Bloom, Richard 50th $97,197 Lackey, Tom 36th $97,197 Bonilla, Susan A. 14th $97,197 Levine, Marc 10th $97,197 Bonta, Rob 18th $97,197 Linder, Eric 60th $97,197 Brough, William P. 73rd $97,197 Lopez, Patty 39th $97,197 Brown, Cheryl R. 47th $97,197 Low, Evan 28th $97,197 Burke, Autumn R. 62nd $97,197 Maienschein, Brian 77th $97,197 Calderon, Ian C. 57th $97,197 Mathis, Devon J. 26th $97,197 Campos, Nora 27th $97,197 Mayes, Chad 42nd $97,197 Chang, Ling Ling 55th $97,197 McCarty, Kevin 7th $97,197 Chau, Ed 49th $97,197 Medina, Jose 61st $97,197 Chávez, Rocky J. 76th $97,197 Melendez, Melissa A. 67th $97,197 Chiu, David 17th $97,197 Mullin, Kevin 22nd $97,197 Chu, Kansen 25th $97,197 Nazarian, Adrin 46th $97,197 Cooley, Ken 8th $97,197 Obernolte, Jay 33rd $97,197 Cooper, Jim 9th $97,197 O'Donnell, Patrick 70th $97,197 Dababneh, Matthew 45th $97,197 Olsen, Kristin 12th $111,776 Dahle, Brian 1st $97,197 Patterson, Jim 23rd $97,197 Daly, Tom 69th $97,197 Perea, Henry T. 31st $97,197 Dodd, Bill 4th $97,197 Quirk, Bill 20th $97,197 Eggman, Susan Talamantes 13th $97,197 Rendon, Anthony 63rd $97,197 Frazier, Jim 11th $97,197 Ridley-Thomas, Sebastian 54th $97,197 Gaines, Beth 6th $97,197 Rodriguez, Freddie 52nd $97,197 Gallagher, James 3rd $97,197 Salas, Jr., Rudy 32nd $97,197 Garcia, Cristina 58th $97,197 Santiago, Miguel 53rd $97,197 Garcia, Eduardo 56th $97,197 Steinorth, Marc 40th $97,197 Gatto, Mike 43rd $97,197 Stone, Mark 29th $97,197 Gipson, Mike A. 64th $97,197 Thurmond, Tony 15th $97,197 Gomez, Jimmy 51st $97,197 Ting, Philip Y. 19th $97,197 Gonzalez, Lorena 80th $97,197 Wagner, Donald P. 68th $97,197 Gordon, Richard S. 24th $97,197 Waldron, Marie 75th $97,197 Gray, Adam C. 21st $97,197 Weber, Shirley N. 79th $97,197 Grove, Shannon L. 34th $97,197 Wilk, Scott 38th $104,486 Hadley, David 66th $97,197 Williams, Das 37th $97,197 Harper, Matthew 74th $97,197 Wood, Jim 2nd $97,197 Assembly Members Salaries – (Updated January 11, 2016)

Annual Annual Assembly Member District Assembly Member District Salary Salary Achadjian, Katcho 35th $100,113 Hernández, Roger 48th $100,113 Alejo, Luis A. 30th $100,113 Holden, Chris R. 41st $107,621 Allen, Travis 72nd $100,113 Irwin, Jacqui 44th $97,197 Atkins, Toni G. 78th $115,129 Jones, Brian W. 71st $100,113 Baker, Catharine B. 16th $97,197 Jones-Sawyer, Sr., Reginald B. 59th $100,113 Bigelow, Franklin E. 5th $100,113 Kim, Young O. 65th $95,291 Bloom, Richard 50th $100,113 Lackey, Tom 36th $97,197 Bonilla, Susan A. 14th $100,113 Levine, Marc 10th $100,113 Bonta, Rob 18th $100,113 Linder, Eric 60th $100,113 Brough, William P. 73rd $100,113 Lopez, Patty 39th $100,113 Brown, Cheryl R. 47th $100,113 Low, Evan 28th $100,113 Burke, Autumn R. 62nd $100,113 Maienschein, Brian 77th $100,113 Calderon, Ian C. 57th $100,113 Mathis, Devon J. 26th $100,113 Campos, Nora 27th $100,113 Mayes, Chad 42nd $115,129 Chang, Ling Ling 55th $100,113 McCarty, Kevin 7th $100,113 Chau, Ed 49th $100,113 Medina, Jose 61st $100,113 Chávez, Rocky J. 76th $100,113 Melendez, Melissa A. 67th $100,113 Chiu, David 17th $100,113 Mullin, Kevin 22nd $100,113 Chu, Kansen 25th $100,113 Nazarian, Adrin 46th $100,113 Cooley, Ken 8th $97,197 Obernolte, Jay 33rd $100,113 Cooper, Jim 9th $100,113 O'Donnell, Patrick 70th $100,113 Dababneh, Matthew 45th $100,113 Olsen, Kristin 12th $100,113 Dahle, Brian 1st $100,113 Patterson, Jim 23rd $100,113 Daly, Tom 69th $100,113 Quirk, Bill 20th $100,113 Dodd, Bill 4th $100,113 Rendon, Anthony 63rd $100,113 Eggman, Susan Talamantes 13th $100,113 Ridley-Thomas, Sebastian 54th $100,113 Frazier, Jim 11th $100,113 Rodriguez, Freddie 52nd $100,113 Gaines, Beth 6th $100,113 Salas, Jr., Rudy 32nd $100,113 Gallagher, James 3rd $100,113 Santiago, Miguel 53rd $100,113 Garcia, Cristina 58th $100,113 Steinorth, Marc 40th $100,113 Garcia, Eduardo 56th $100,113 Stone, Mark 29th $100,113 Gatto, Mike 43rd $100,113 Thurmond, Tony 15th $100,113 Gipson, Mike A. 64th $100,113 Ting, Philip Y. 19th $100,113 Gomez, Jimmy 51st $100,113 Wagner, Donald P. 68th $100,113 Gonzalez, Lorena 80th $100,113 Waldron, Marie 75th $107,621 Gordon, Richard S. 24th $100,113 Weber, Shirley N. 79th $100,113 Gray, Adam C. 21st $100,113 Wilk, Scott 38th $100,113 Grove, Shannon L. 34th $97,197 Williams, Das 37th $100,113 Hadley, David 66th $97,197 Wood, Jim 2nd $100,113 Harper, Matthew 74th $100,113 Vacant 31st - Assembly Members Salaries – (Updated April 18, 2016)

Annual Annual Assembly Member District Assembly Member District Salary Salary Achadjian, Katcho 35th $100,113 Harper, Matthew 74th $100,113 Alejo, Luis A. 30th $100,113 Hernández, Roger 48th $100,113 Allen, Travis 72nd $100,113 Holden, Chris R. 41st $100,113 Arambula, Joaquin 31st $100,113 Irwin, Jacqui 44th $97,197 Atkins, Toni G. 78th $100,113 Jones, Brian W. 71st $100,113 Baker, Catharine B. 16th $97,197 Jones-Sawyer, Sr., Reginald B. 59th $100,113 Bigelow, Franklin E. 5th $100,113 Kim, Young O. 65th $95,291 Bloom, Richard 50th $100,113 Lackey, Tom 36th $97,197 Bonilla, Susan A. 14th $100,113 Levine, Marc 10th $100,113 Bonta, Rob 18th $100,113 Linder, Eric 60th $100,113 Brough, William P. 73rd $100,113 Lopez, Patty 39th $100,113 Brown, Cheryl R. 47th $100,113 Low, Evan 28th $100,113 Burke, Autumn R. 62nd $100,113 Maienschein, Brian 77th $100,113 Calderon, Ian C. 57th $107,621 Mathis, Devon J. 26th $100,113 Campos, Nora 27th $100,113 Mayes, Chad 42nd $115,129 Chang, Ling Ling 55th $100,113 McCarty, Kevin 7th $100,113 Chau, Ed 49th $100,113 Medina, Jose 61st $100,113 Chávez, Rocky J. 76th $100,113 Melendez, Melissa A. 67th $100,113 Chiu, David 17th $100,113 Mullin, Kevin 22nd $100,113 Chu, Kansen 25th $100,113 Nazarian, Adrin 46th $100,113 Cooley, Ken 8th $97,197 Obernolte, Jay 33rd $100,113 Cooper, Jim 9th $100,113 O'Donnell, Patrick 70th $100,113 Dababneh, Matthew 45th $100,113 Olsen, Kristin 12th $100,113 Dahle, Brian 1st $100,113 Patterson, Jim 23rd $100,113 Daly, Tom 69th $100,113 Quirk, Bill 20th $100,113 Dodd, Bill 4th $100,113 Rendon, Anthony 63rd $115,129 Eggman, Susan Talamantes 13th $100,113 Ridley-Thomas, Sebastian 54th $100,113 Frazier, Jim 11th $100,113 Rodriguez, Freddie 52nd $100,113 Gaines, Beth 6th $100,113 Salas, Jr., Rudy 32nd $100,113 Gallagher, James 3rd $100,113 Santiago, Miguel 53rd $100,113 Garcia, Cristina 58th $100,113 Steinorth, Marc 40th $100,113 Garcia, Eduardo 56th $100,113 Stone, Mark 29th $100,113 Gatto, Mike 43rd $100,113 Thurmond, Tony 15th $100,113 Gipson, Mike A. 64th $100,113 Ting, Philip Y. 19th $100,113 Gomez, Jimmy 51st $100,113 Wagner, Donald P. 68th $100,113 Gonzalez, Lorena 80th $100,113 Waldron, Marie 75th $107,621 Gordon, Richard S. 24th $100,113 Weber, Shirley N. 79th $100,113 Gray, Adam C. 21st $100,113 Wilk, Scott 38th $100,113 Grove, Shannon L. 34th $97,197 Williams, Das 37th $100,113 Hadley, David 66th $97,197 Wood, Jim 2nd $100,113

CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY REPORTING PERIOD 12/1/15 to 11/30/16 For Assembly Member Young Kim FOR AUGUST 2016 9TH" MONTH CAPITOL DISTRICT YEAR· TO-DATE

Staff Salary ...... o o o 74,124 Member Travel In-State ...... o o o 458 Out-of-State ...... "...... o o o o Staff Travel In-State ...... 138 279 417 12,528 Out-of-State ...... 0 0 0 o Auto ...... 0 0 0 o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 9 0 9 97 Telephone ...... 25 83 108 935 Postage ...... 89,048 250 89,298 221,760 Furniture & Equipment...... 0 0 0 o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 24 0 24 5,683 ------TOTAL 89,245 612 89,856 315,585

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE -23,585

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 75.0%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 108.1%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... o o o o Member Travel & Per Diem

Session Travel...... 466 o 466 11,7~2

Mileage Reimbursement...... ~...... o o o o Non-Session Per Diem ...... o o o o D. O. Rent...... o 3,149 3,149 27,607 Lease Car Expenses Gas & Oil...... o o o o Maintenance ...... o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 466 3,149 3,615 39,349

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 89,711 3,761 93,471 354,934 CSLA Cash Books Date: 13-SEP-16 16:15:25 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 2 Current Period: AUG-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y- T-D OBJ AUG-16 AUG-16 AUG-16

o o o 74,124

TOTAL STAFF SALARIES o o 74,124

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 0 0 0 458 ------TOTAL MEMBER TRAVEL I/S 0 0 0 458

Sl PER DIEM IN STATE 0 0 0 768 STAFF TRAVEL IN STATE 138 0 138 6,210 STAFF DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 279 279 5,272 STAFF CAR RENTAL 0 0 0 278 ------_._------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 138 279 417 12 , 528

BOTTLED WATER 0 97 ------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 9 0 9 97

LONG DISTANCE 18 47 65 564 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 36 36 324 MESSAGE UNITS 7 0 7 47 ------TOTAL TELEPHONE 25 83 108 935

POSTAGE - METERED 103 25 0 353 2,888 PC' 'GE STAMPS 0 0 0 0

P~. GE EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 127 0 127 789 COMM POSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 88,818 0 88 , 818 218,082 ------~------TOTAL POSTAGE 89,048 250 89,298 221,760

BUSINESS CARDS 0 0 49 CERTIFICATES 0 0 4 , 075 GOLD SEALS 0 0 0 35 RESOLUTIONS 24 0 24 240 NEWSPAPERS 0 0 192 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 960 OTHER SUPPLIES 0 0 0 132

------...... - --- TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 24 0 24 5,683 CSLA Cash Books Date: 13 - SEP-16 16:15:25 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 3 Current Period: AUG-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ AUG-16 AUG-16 AUG-16

TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE 89,245 612 89,856 315,585 ·

MEMBER SESSION TRAVEL 466 o 466 11,742

TOTAL SESSION TRAVEL 466 466 11,742

RET OFFICE o 3,149 3,149 27,607

TOTAL D. O. RENT o 3,149 3,149 27,607

TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 466 3,149 3,615 39,349 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 89,711 3,761 93,471 354,934 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 14-Sep-16

Staff Salary ...... 20,789 20,789 17,289 6,009 6,009 3,275 0 0 0 10,570 16,109 21,653 122,492 Member Travel ...... 0 458 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 60 60 638 Staff Travel ...... 2,264 1,812 2,618 1,013 839 1,838 1,245 482 417 1,200 1,200 1,200 16,128 Rent, Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 21 9 12 12 9 12 7 9 35 35 35 202 Telephone ...... 99 27 186 118 104 106 96 91 108 150 150 150 1,385 Postage ...... 1,496 3,717 52,143 21,014 1,107 405 15,945 36,635 89,298 1,747 1,747 1,747 227,000 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 836 124 1,667 1,024 1,685 84 123 24 1,100 1,100 1,100 8,983 Total 24,771 27,661 72,369 29,833 9,094 7,318 17,382 37,337 89,856 14,862 20,401 25,945 376,828

Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Deficit (84,828)

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11130/16) 14-Sep-16

SALARIES:

Capitol Kammerich, Leigh (1) ...... 5,280 5,280 5,280' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,544 21,384 Leonard, Elena (2) ...... 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,670 Marin, Alex Whitford (3) ...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,010 3,010 3,010 16,530 Shroyer, Bryan (4) ...... 7,000 7,000 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,560 8,400 8,400 41,860

District Choi, Linette (5)...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 o o o o 1,965 1,965 23,580 Leonard, Elena (2)...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o 2,734 2,734 5,468

Total 20,789 20,789 17,289 6,009 6,009 3,275 o o o 10,570 16,109 21,653 122,492

(1) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 3/1/16 to 10/31/16 (2) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 5/1116 to 9/30/16 (3) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 3/1116 to 8/31/16 (4) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 2/16/16 to 8/31/16 (5) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 6/1116 to 9/30/16

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY REPORTING PERIOD 12/1/15 to 11/30/16 For Assembly Member Young Kim FOR JULY 2016 8TH MONTH CAPITOL DISTRICT YEAR-TO-DATE

Staff Salary ...... '" ...... o o o 74,124 Member Travel In-State ...... o o o 458 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Staff Tra vel In-State ...... 315 166 482 12,111 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Auto ...... o o o o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 7 o 7 88 Telephone ...... 16 75 91 827 Postage ...... 36,384 250 36,635 132,462 Furniture & Equipment...... o o o o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 123 o 123 5,659

TOTAL 36,845 492 37,337 225,729

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE 66,271

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 66.7%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 77.3%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... o o o o Member Travel & Per Diem Session TraveL ...... 2,267 o 2,267 11,276 Mileage Reimbursement...... '" ...... o o o o Non-Session Per Diem ...... o o o o D. O. Rent...... o o o 24,458 Lease Car Expenses Gas & Oil...... o o o o Maintenance ...... o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 2,267 o 2,267 35,734

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 39, 112 492 39,604 261,463 CSLA Cash Books Date: ll-AUG-16 14:45:31 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 2 Current Period: JUL-16

Currency: USD Mernber=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T- D OBJ JUL-16 JUL-16 JUL-16

74,124 ------TOTAL STAFF SALARIES 0 74,124

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 0 0 458 ------TOTAL MEMBER TRAVEL I/S 0 0 0 458

S~ PER DIEM IN STATE 0 0 0 768 STAFF TRAVEL IN STATE 215 0 215 6,072 STAFF DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 166 166 4,993 STAFF CAR RENTAL 101 0 101 278 ------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 315 166 482 12,111

BOTTLED WATER 7 0 7 88 ------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 7 0 7 88

LONG DISTANCE 10 39 49 499 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 36 36 288 MESSAGE UNITS. 5 0 5 40 ------"- ---- _.------TOTAL TELEPHONE 16 75 91 827

POSTAGE - METERED 80 250 330 10 ,197 POS~"GE STAMPS 0 0 0 PC E EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 46 0 46 662 COMl", POSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 36,258 0 36 , 258 121,603 ------TOTAL POSTAGE 36,384 250 36,635 132,462

BUSINESS CARDS 0 0 49 CERTIFICATES 75 0 75 4,075 GOLD SEALS 0 0 0 35 RESOLUTIONS 48 0 48 216 NEWSPAPERS 0 0 0 192 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 0 0 960 OTHER SUPPLIES 0 0 0 132 ------TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 123 0 123 5,659 CSLA Cash Books Date : 11-AUG-16 14:45:31 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 3 Current Period : JUL-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ JUL-16 JUL-16 JUL-16

TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE 36,845 492 37,3 3 7 225,729

MEMBER SESSION TRAVEL 2,267 o 2 ,267 11,276

TOTAL SESSION TRAVEL 2,267 2,267 11,276

RP-- - OFFICE o o o 24,458

TOTAL D. O. RENT o o o 24,458

TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 2,267 o 2,267 35,734

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 492 39,604 261,463 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11130116) 15-Aug-16

Staff Salary ...... 20,789 20,789 17,289 6,009 6,009 3,275 0 0 0 10,570 16,109 21,653 122,492 Member Travel ...... 0 458 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 60 60 60 698 Staff Travel ...... 2,264 1,812 2,618 1,013 839 1,838 1,245 482 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 16,911 Rent, Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 21 9 12 12 9 12 7 35 35 35 35 228 Telephone ...... 99 27 186 118 104 106 96 91 150 150 150 150 1,427 Postage ...... 1,496 3,717 52,143 21,014 1,107 405 15,945 36,635 19,384 19,384 19,384 19,384 210,000 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 836 124 1,667 1,024 1,685 84 84 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 10,020 Total 24,771 27,661 72,369 29,833 9,094 7,318 17,382 37,298 21,929 32,499 38,038 43,582 361,776 Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Deficit (69,776)

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 15-Aug-16

SALARIES:

Capitol

Kammerich, Leigh (1 ) ...... 5,280 5,280 5,280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,544 21,384 Leonard, Elena (2) ...... 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 0 0 0 0 0 2,734 2,734 19,138 Marin, Alex Whitford (3) ...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 0 d 0 0 0 3,010 3,010 3,010 16,530 Shroyer, Bryan (4) ...... 7,000 7,000 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,560 8,400 8,400 41,860

District Choi, Linette (5)...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 o o o o 1,965 1,965 23,580

Total 20,789 20,789 17,289 6,009 6,009 3,275 o o o 10,570 16,109 21,653 122,492

(1) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 3/1/16 to 10131/16 (2) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 5/1/16 to 9/30/16 (3) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 3/1116 to 8/31/16 (4) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 2/16/16 to 8/31/16 (5) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 6/1116 to 9/30/16

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY REPORTING PERIOD 1211115 to 11130116 For Assembly Member Young Kim FOR JUNE 2016 7TH MONTH CAPITOL DISTRICT YEAR-TO-DATE

Staff Salary ...... -43,374 -7,500 -50,874 74,124 Member Travel In-State ...... o o o 458 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Staff Travel In-State ...... 430 815 1,245 11,629 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Auto ...... o o o o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 12 o 12 81 Telephone ...... 16 81 96 736 Postage ...... 15,695 250 15,945 95,827 Furniture & Equipment...... o o o o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 24 60 84 5,536

TOTAL -27,197 -6,295 -33,492 188,392

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE 103,608

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 58.3%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 64.5%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... 0 0 0 0 Member Travel & Per Diem Session Travel...... , ...... ;...... 1,863 0 1,863 9,009

Mileage Reimbursement...... ~...... 0 0 0 0 Non-Session Per Diem ...... 0 0 0 0 D. O. Rent...... 0 6,115 6, 115 24,458 Lease Car Expenses Gas&Oil...... 0 0 0 0 Maintenance ...... 0 0 0 0 ------TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 1,863 6,115 7,977 33,467 === ~==----=== TOTAL EXPENDITURES -25,335 -180 -25,515 221,859 CSLA Cash Books Date: 13-JUL-16 12:16:45 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT page: 2 Current Period: JUN-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ JUN-16 JUN - 16 JUN-16

(43,374 ) (7,500 ) (50,874) 74,124 ------TOTAL STAFF SALARIES (43,374 ) (7,500 ) (50,874) 74,124

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 0 0 458 ------TOTAL MEMBER TRAVEL I/S 0 0 458

ST~~F PER DIEM IN STATE 0 0 0 768 s: TRAVEL IN STATE 430 0 430 5,857 STAl"F DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 815 815 4,826 STAFF CAR RENTAL 0 0 0 178 ------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 430 815 1,245 11,629

BOTTLED WATER 12 0 12 81 ------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 12 0 12 81

LONG DISTANCE 10 45 55 449 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 36 36 252 MESSAGE UNITS 5 0 5 35 ------TOTAL TELEPHONE 16 81 96 736

POSTAGE - METERED (26) 250 224 9,867 POSTAGE STAMPS 0 0 0 0 POSTAGE EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 33 0 33 616 CO 'OSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 15 , 688 0 15,688 85,345 ------TOTAL POSTAGE 15,695 250 15,945 95,827

BUSINESS CARDS 0 0 0 49 CERTIFICATES 0 0 0 4,000 GOLD SEALS 0 0 0 35 RESOLUTIONS 24 0 24 16B NEWSPAPERS 0 0 0 192 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 60 60 960 OTHER SUPPLIES 0 0 0 132 ------TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 24 60 84 5,536 CSLA Cash Books Date : 13 - JUL - 16 12 : 16:45 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Pag e : 3 Current Peri o d: JUN- 16

Currency : USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OB,] JUN-16 JUN-16 JUN-16

TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE (27,197 ) (6,295 ) (33.492) 188,392

MEMBER SESSION TRAVEL 1,863 o 1,863 9,009

TOTAL SESSION TRAVEL 1,863 o 1,863 9,009

RENT - OFFICE o 6,115 6,115 24,458

:OTAL D.O. RENT o 6,115 6,115 24,458

TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 1,863 6,115 7,977 33,467

TOTAL EXPENDITURES (25,335 ) (18 0) (25,515 ) 221,859 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 14-Jul-16

Staff Salary ...... 20,789 20,789 17,289 6,009 6,009 3,275 0 0 0 10,570 18,074 23,618 126,422 Member Travel ...... 0 458 0 0 0 0 0 60 60 60 60 60 758 Staff Travel ...... 2,264 1,812 2,618 1,013 839 1,838 1,245 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 17,629 Rent, Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 21 9 12 12 9 12 35 35 35 35 35 256 Telephone ...... 99 27 186 118 104 106 96 150 150 150 150 150 1,486 Postage ...... 1,496 3,717 52,143 21,014 1,107 405 15,945 10,835 10,835 10,835 10,835 10,835 150,000 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 836 124 1,667 1,024 1,685 84 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 11,036 Total 24,771 27,661 72,369 29,833 9,094 7,318 17,382 13,380 13,380 23,950 31,454 36,998 307,587 Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Deficit {15,587)

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 14-Jul-16

SALARIES: Capitol Kammerich, Leigh (1 ) ...... 5,280 5,280 5,280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,544 21,384 Leonard, Elena (2) ...... 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 0 0 0 0 0 2,734 2,734 19,138 Marin, Alex Whitford (3) ...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,010 3,010 3,010 16,530 Shroyer, Bryan (4) ...... 7,000 7,000 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 7,560 8,400 8,400 41,860

District Choi, Linette (5)...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3;275 3,275 o o o o 3,930 3,930 27,510

Total 20,789 20,789 17,289 6,009 6,009 3,275 o o o 10,570 18,074 23,618 126,422

Staff Salary ...... 15,278 5,775 21,053 124,998 Member Travel In-State ...... o o o 458 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Staff Travel In-State ...... 474 1,363 1,838 10,384 Out-of-State ...... '" ...... o o o o Auto ...... o o o o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 9 o 9 70 Telephone ...... 25 81 106 640 Postage ...... 155 250 405 79,882 Furniture & Equipment...... o o o o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 1,548 137 1,685 5,452

TOTAL 17,490 7,606 25,096 221,884

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE . 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE 70,116

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 50.0%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 76.0%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... _ 0 0 0 0 Member Travel & Per Diem Session TraveL ...... 1,897 0 1,897 7,146 Mileage Reimbursement...... 0 0 0 0 Non-Session Per Diem ...... 0 0 0 0 D. O. Rent...... 0 3,057 3,057 18,344 Lease Car Expenses Gas & Oil...... 0 0 0 0 Maintenance ...... 0 0 0 ------° TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 1,897 3,057 4,954 25,490 =--===:-=:::::=..======----======TOTAL EXPENDITURES 19,387 10,664 30,050 247,374 CSLA Cash Books Date: 14-JUN- 1 6 09:46:13 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page : 2 Current Period: MAY-16

Currency: USD Men~er=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ MAY-16 MAY-16 MAY-16

15,278 5,775 21,053 124,998 ------TOTAL STAFF SALARIES 15,278 5,775 21,053 124,998

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 0 0 0 458 ------TOTAL MEMBER TRAVEL I/S 0 0 0 458

STN ,R DIEM IN STATE 0 325 325 768 STAF~ rRAVEL IN STATE 474 95 569 5,427 STAFF DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 943 943 4,011 STAFF CAR RENTAL 0 0 0 178 ------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 474 1,363 1,838 10,384

BOTTLED WATER 9 0 70 ------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 0 9 70

LONG DISTANCE 20 45 65 394 .VIONTHLY SERVICE 0 36 36 216 VIESSAGE UNITS 5 0 5 29 ------TOTAL TELEPHONE 25 81 106 640

POSTAGE - METERED 49 250 299 9,643 POS'l'7.lGE STAMPS 0 0 0 0 PO, '" EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 106 0 106 582 :OM.·. ~OSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 0 0 0 69,657 ------TOTAL POSTAGE 155 250 405 79,882

3USINESS CARDS 0 0 49 :ERTIFICATES 1,500 1,500 4,000 :;OLD SEALS 0 0 0 35 ~ESOLUTIONS 48 0 48 144 '1EWSPAPERS 0 0 0 192 )FFICE SUPPLIES 0 137 137 900 )THER SUPPLIES 0 0 0 132 ------TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 1,548 137 1,685 5,452 CSLA Cash Books Date: 14-JUN-16 09:46:13 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 3 Current Period: MAY-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ MAY-16 MAY-16 MAY-16

TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE 17,490 7,606 25,096 221,884

MEMBER SESSION TRAVEL 1,897 o 1,897 7,146

TOTAL SESSION TRAVEL 1,897 7,146 ° 1,897 RENT OFFICE ° 3,057 3,057 18,344 '!ufAL D. O. RENT ° 3,057 3,057 1 8,344 TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE ° ° ° °

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 1,897 3,057 4,954 25,490

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 19,387 10,664 30 , 050 247,374 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11130/16) 16-Jun-16

Staff Salary ...... 20,789 20,789 17,289 6,009 6,009 3,275 0 0 0 8,800 15,509 21,053 119,522 Member Travel ...... 0 458 0 0 0 0 60 60 60 60 60 60 818 Staff Travel ...... 2,264 1,812 2,618 1,013 839 1,838 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 17,584 Rent, Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 21 9 12 12 9 35 35 35 35 35 35 280 .-elephone ...... 99 27 186 118 104 106 150 150 150 150 150 150 1,540 Postage ...... 1,496 3,717 52,143 21,014 1,107 405 11,686 11,686 11,686 11,686 11,686 11,686 150,000 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 836 124 1,667 1,024 1,685 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 12,052 Total 24,771 27,661 72,369 29,833 9,094 7,318 14,231 14,231 14,231 23,031 29,740 35,284 301,795 Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Deficit {9,795)

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 -11/30/16) 16-Jun-16

SALARIES:

Capitol

Kammerich, Leigh (1 ) ...... 5,280 5,280 5,280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,544 21,384 Leonard, Elena (2) ...... 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 0 0 0 0 0 2,734 2,734 19,138 Marin, Alex Whitford (3) ...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,500 2,500 2,500 15,000 Shroyer, Bryan (4) ...... 7,000 7,000 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,300 7,000 7,000 37,800

District Choi, Linette (5)...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 o o o o 3,275 3,275 26,200

Total 20,789 20,789 17,289 6,009 6,009 3,275 o o o 8,800 15,509 21,053 119,522

(1) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 3/1/16 to 10/31116 (2) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 5/1/16 to 9/30/16 (3) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 3/1116 to 8/31/16 (4) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 2/16/16 to 8/31/16 (5) Transfer to Rep. Caucus 6/1116 to 9/30/16

Staff Salary ...... 15,014 5,775 20,789 103,945 Member Travel In-State ...... o o 0 458 Out-of-State ...... o o 0 0 Staff Travel In-State ...... 471 368 839 8,546 Out-of-State ...... 0 0 0 o Auto ...... 0 0 0 o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 12 0 12 61 Telephone ...... 22 82 104 534 Postage ...... 857 250 1,107 79,477 Furniture & Equipment...... 0 0 0 o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 1,024 0 1,024 3,767 ------TOTAL === 17,399 6,475 23 ,874 196,788

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE 95,212

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 41.7%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 67.4%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... , ...... 0 0 0 0 Member Travel & Per Diem Session TraveL ...... 1,423 0 1,423 5,249 Mileage Reimbursement...... 0 0 0 0 Non-Session Per Diem ...... 0 0 0 0 D. O. Rent...... 0 3,057 3,057 15,287 Lease Car Expenses Gas & Oil...... 0 0 0 0 Maintenance...... - 0 0 0 0 ------TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 1,423 3,057 4,480 20,536 ======TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18,822 9,532 28,354 217,323 CSLA Cash Books Date : 13-MAY - 16 14:31:59 eSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 2 Current Period: APR-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OB,J APR-16 APR-16 APR-16

15,014 5,775 20,789 103,945 ------TOTAL STAFF SALARIES 15,014 5,775 20,789 1 03,945

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 0 458 ------° ------° ------TOTAL MEMBER TRAVEL I/S 0 ° 0 458

ST.' PER DIEM IN STATE 0 0 443 SL TRAVEL IN STATE 430 43 °0 4 , 857 STAFF DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 368° 368 3,068 STAFF CAR RENTAL 41 41 178 ------° ------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 471 368 839 8,546

BOTTLED WATER 12 0 12 61 ------,------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 12 0 12 61

LONG DISTANCE 17 46 62 329 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 36 36 180 MESSAGE UNITS 5 0 5 24 ------TOTAL TELEPHONE 22 82 104 534

POSTAGE - METERED 95 250 345 9,343 POSTAGE STAMPS 0 0 0 0 PO' iE EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 16 0 16 476 CO. OSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 746 0 746 69,657 ------TOTAL POSTAGE 857 250 1,107 79,477

BUSINESS CARDS 0 0 49 CERTIFICATES 1,000 0 1,000 ° 2,500 GOLD SEALS 0 0 0 35 RESOLUTIONS 24 0 24 96 NEWSPAPERS 0 0 0 19 2 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 0 0 763 OTHER SUPPLIES 0 0 0 132 ------TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 1,024 0 1,024 3,767 CSLA Cash Books Date: 13-MAY- 16 14 : 31:59 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 3 Current Period : APR - 16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ APR-16 APR-16 APR-16

------TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE 17,399 6,475 23,874 196,788

ME~ffiERSESSION TRAVEL 1,423 o 1 ,423 5,249

TOTAL SESSION TRAVEL 1,423 o 1 ,423 5 , 249

RENT - OFFICE o 3,057 3,057 15,287

rAL D. O. RENT o 3,057 3 , 057 15,287

TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 1,423 3,057 4,480 20,536

TOTA.L EXPENDITURES 18,822 9,532 28,354 217 , 323 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 16-May-16

Staff Salary ...... 20.789 20.789 20.789 20.789 20.789 21.053 21.053 21.053 21.053 21.053 21.053 21.053 251.316 Member Travel ...... 0 458 0 0 0 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 878 Staff Travel ...... 2.264 1.812 2.618 1.013 839 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1.200 1,200 1,200 16.946 Rent. Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 21 9 12 12 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 306 Telephone ...... 99 27 186 118 104 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1.584 Postage ...... 1,496 3,717 52,143 21,014 1,107 10,075 10.075 10,075 10,075 10,075 10.075 10,075 150.000 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 836 124 1.667 1.024 1,100 1,100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 11,467 Total 24.771 27,661 75,869 44.613 23.874 33.673 33.673 33.673 33.673 33.673 33.673 33.673 432,497

Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Deficit {140,497)

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1115 - 11/30/16) 16-May-16

SALARIES:

Capitol Kammerich, Leigh ....., ...... 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 65,208 Leonard, Elena'" ...... 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 32,808 Marin, Alex Whitford ...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 30,000 Shroyer, Bryan ...... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 84,000

District Choi, Linette...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 39,300

Total 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 251,316

Staff Salary ...... '" ...... 15,014 5,775 20,789 83,156 Member Travel In-State ...... o o o 458 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Staff Travel In-State ...... 447 566 1,013 7707 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Auto ...... o o o o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 12 o 12 49 Telephone ...... 35 83 118 430 Postage ...... 20,514 500 21,014 78,370 Furniture & Equipment...... o o o o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 1,524 143 1,667 2,743

TOTAL 37,546 7,067 44,613 172,914

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE 119,086

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 33.3%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 59.2%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... 0 0 0 0 Member Travel & Per Diem Session Travel...... 2,217 0 2,217 3,827 Mileage Reimbursement...... 0 0 0 0 Non-Session Per Diem ...... 0 0 0 0 D. O. Rent...... 3,057 3,057 12,229 Lease Car Expenses ° Gas&Oil...... Maintenance ...... °0 °0 °0 °0 ------TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 2,217 3,057 5,274 16,056 .===.=:==~ =====----==::::..:..:-= ===::::.:=-======~= TOTAL EXPENDITURES 39,763 10,125 49,888 188,970 CSLA Cash Books Date: 13 - APR-16 14:31:08 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 2 Current Period: MAR-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y- T-D OBJ MAR-16 MAR-16 MAR-16

15,014 5,775 20,789 83,156 ------TOTAL STAFF SALARIES 15,014 5,775 20,789 83,156

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 0 458 ------TOTAL MEMBER TRAVEL I/S 0 0 458

SL PER DIEM IN STATE 0 0 0 443 STAFF TRAVEL IN STATE 447 500 947 4,427 STAFF DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 66 66 2,700 STAFF CAR RENTAL 0 0 0 137 ------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 447 566 1 ,013 7,707

BOTTLED WATER 12 0 12 49 ------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 12 0 12 49

LONG DISTANCE 31 47 78 267 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 36 36 144 MESSAGE UNITS 4 0 4 19 ------_ ... _- TOTAL TELEPHONE 3 5 83 118 430

POSTAGE - METERED 106 500 606 8,998 PC lE STAMPS 0 0 0 0 PC 1E EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 50 0 50 460 COMM POSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 20 , 358 20 , 358 68,912

------~------TOTAL POSTAGE 20,514 500 21,014 78,370

BUSINESS CARDS 0 0 0 49 CERTIFICATES 1,500 0 1,500 1,500 GOLD SEALS 0 0 0 35 RESOLUTIONS 24 0 24 72 NEWSPAPERS 0 0 0 192 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 143 143 763 OTHER SUPPLIES 0 0 0 132 ------TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 1,524 143 1,667 2,743 CSLA Cash Books Date: 13 - APR-16 14 : 31:08 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page : Current Period: MAR-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ MAR-16 MAR-16 MAR-16

TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE 37,546 7,067 44,613 172,914

MEMBER SESSION TRAVEL 2,217 o 2,217 3 , 827

TOTAL SESSION TRAVEL 2,217 ° 2,217 3,827

OFFICE o 3,057 3,057 12,229

TOTAL D. O. RENT o 3,057 3,057 12,229

TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 2,217 3,057 5,274 16,056

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 39,763 10,125 49,888 188,970 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 15-Apr-16

Staff Salary ...... ; ...... 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 251,316 Member Travel ...... 458 0 0 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 938 Staff Travel ...... 2,264° 1,812 2,618 1,013 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 17,307 Rent, Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 21 9 12 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 329 Telephone ...... 99 27 186 118 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1,630 Postage ...... 1,496 3,717 52,143 21,014 2,704 2,704 2,704 2,704 2,704 2,704 2,704 2,704 100,000 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 836 124° 1,667° 1,100 1,100 1,100° 1,100 ° 1,100 ° 1,100 ° 1,100 ° 1,100° 11,543° Total 24,771 27,661 75,869 44,613 26,038 26,302 26,302 26,302 26,302 26,302 26,302 26,302 383,064

Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Deficit (91,064)

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 15-Apr-16

SALARIES:

Capitol Kammerich, Leigh ...... 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 5,544 65,208 Leonard, Elena ...... 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 32,808 Marin, Alex Whitford ...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 30,000 Shroyer, Bryan ...... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 84,000

District

Choi, Linette...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 39,300

Total 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 21,053 251,316

Staff Salary ...... 15,014 5,775 20,789 62,367 Member Travel In-State ...... o o o 458 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Staff Travel In-State ...... 513 2,105 2,618 6,694 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Auto ...... o o o o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 9 o 9 37 Telephone ...... 23 163 186 312 Postage ...... 51,893 250 52,143 57,356 Furniture & Equipment...... o o o o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 46 78 124 1,076

TOTAL 67,498 8,371 75,869 128,300

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE 163,700

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 25.0%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 43.9%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... o o o o Member Travel & Per Diem Session Travel...... 1,381 o 1,381 1,610 Mileage Reimbursement...... o o o o Non-Session Per Diem ...... o o o o D. O. Rent...... o 3,057 3,057 9,172 Lease Car Expenses Gas & Oil...... o o o o Maintenance ...... o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 1,381 3,057 4,438 10,782

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 68,878 11,429 80,307 139,082 CSLA Cash Books Date: 15-MAR - 16 11:09:24 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 2 Current Period: FEB-16

Currency: USD Mernber=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ FEB-16 FEB-16 FEB-16

15,014 5,775 20,789 62,367

- ~ - --~ ------TOTAL STAFF SALARIES 15,014 5,775 20,789 62,367

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 0 0 0 458 ------TOTAL MEMBER TRAVEL I/S 0 0 458

ST PER DIEM IN STATE 0 0 0 443 STAFF TRAVEL IN STATE 464 458 922 3,480 STAFF DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 1 , 647 1,647 2,634 STAFF CAR RENTAL 49 0 49 137 ------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 513 2,105 2,618 6,694

BOTTLED WATER 9 0 9 37 ------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 9 0 37

LONG DISTANCE 19 91 110 189 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 72 72 108 MESSAGE UNITS 4 0 4 15 ------TOTAL TELEPHONE 23 163 186 312

POSTAGE - METERED 7,707 250 7,957 8,392

POP~7IGE STAMPS 0 0 0 0 peE EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 15 0 15 410 COjvjJVIPOSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 44 , 171 0 44,171 48,553 ------~------TOTAL POSTAGE 51,893 250 52,143 57,356

BUSINESS CARDS 0 0 0 49 GOLD SEALS 0 0 35 RESOLUTIONS 24 0 24 48 NEWSPAPERS 0 0 192 OFFICE SUPPLIES 22 78 100 620 OTHER SUPPLIES 0 0 0 132 ------TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 46 78 124 1,076 CSLA Cash Books Date: 15-MAR-16 11:09:24 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 3 Current Period: FEB-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ FEB-16 FEB-16 FEB-16

TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE 67,498 8,371 75,869 128,300

MEMBER SESSION TRAVEL 1,381 ° 1,381 1,610 TOTAL SESSION TRAVEL 1,381 1,381 1,610 OFFICE ° 3,057 3,057 9,172 TOTAL D. O. RENT 9,172 3,057 3,057

TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE ° ° ° °

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 1,381 3,057 4,438 10,782

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 68,878 11,429 80,307 139,082 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 -11/30/16) 16-Mar-16

Staff Salary ...... 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 249,468 Member Travel ...... 0 458 0 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 998 Staff Travel ...... 2,264 1,812 2,618 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 17,494

Rent, Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 21 9 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 352 Telephone ...... 99 27 186 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1,662 Postage ...... 1,496 3,717 52,143 4,738 4,738 4,738 4,738 4,738 4,738 4,738 4,738 4,738 100,000 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 836 . 124 1,100 1,100 1,·100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 10,976 Total 24,771 27,661 75,869 28,072 28,072 28,072 28,072 28,072 28,072 28,072 28,072 28,072 380,951

Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Deficit (88,951 )

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 16-Mar-16

SALARIES:

Capitol Kammerich, Leigh ...... 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 63,360 Leonard, Elena ...... 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 32,808 Marin, Alex Whitford ...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 30,000 Shroyer, Bryan ...... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 84,000

District Chai, Linette...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 39,300

Total 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 249,468

Staff Salary ...... 15,014 5,775 20,789 41,578 Member Travel In-State ...... 458 o 458 458 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Staff Travel In-State ...... '...... 1,161 651 1,812 4,076 Out-of-State ...... o o o o Auto ...... o o o o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 21 o 21 28 Telephone ...... 27 o 27 126 Postage ...... 3,467 250 3,717 5,213 Furniture & Equipment...... o o o o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 704 132 836 951

TOTAL 20,852 6,809 27,661 52,431

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE 239,569

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 16.7%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 18.0%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... o o o o Member Travel & Per Diem Session Travel...... 229 o 229 229 Mileage Reimbursement...... o o o o Non-Session Per Diem ...... o o o o D. O. Rent...... o 3,057 3,057 6,115 Lease Car Expenses Gas&Oil...... o o o o Maintenance ...... o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 229 3,057 3,286 6,344

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 21,081 9,866 30,947 58,775 CSLA Cash Books Date: 16-FEB-16 15:19:11 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 2 Current Period: JAN-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ JAN-16 JAN-16 JAN-16

15,014 5,775 20,789 41,578 ------TOTAL STAFF SALARIES 15,014 5,775 20,789 41,578

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 458 0 458 458 ------TOTAL MEMBER TRAVEL I/S 458 0 458 458

STA££ PER DIEM IN STATE 0 0 0 443 STAFF TRAVEL IN STATE 1,072 1,072 2 , 557 STAFF DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 651 651 987 STAFF CAR RENTAL 89 0 89 89 ------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 1,161 651 1,812 4,076

BOTTLED WATER 21 0 21 28 ------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 21 0 21 28

LONG DISTANCE 20 0 20 78 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 0 0 36 MESSAGE UNITS 7 0 7 11 ------TOTAL TELEPHONE 27 0 27 126

POS'T'1\GE METERED 66 250 316 435 PC lE STAMPS 0 0 0 0 PG.:>.. rlGE EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 49 0 49 396 COMM POSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 3 , 352 0 3 , 352 4,383 ------TOTAL POSTAGE 3,467 250 3,717 5 , 213

BUSINESS CARDS 0 0 49 GOLD SEALS 18 18 35 RESOLUTIONS 0 0 0 24 NEWSPAPERS 192 0 192 192 OFFICE SUPPLIES 495 0 495 519 OTHER SUPPLIES 0 132 132 132 ------TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 704 132 836 951 CSLA Cash Books Date: 1 6-FEB-16 15:19:11 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 3 Current Period: JAN-16

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ JAN-16 JAN-16 JAN-16

TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE 20,852 6,809 27,661 52,431

MEMBER SESSION TRAVEL 229 o 229 229 TOTAL SESSION TRAVEL 229 ° 229 229 RE OFFICE ° 3,057 3,057 6,115 TOTAL D. O. RENT o 3,057 3,057 6,115

TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE 229 3,057 3,286 6,344

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 21,081 9,866 30,947 58,775 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 17-Feb-16

Staff Salary ...... 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 249,468 Member Travel ...... 0 458 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 1,058 Staff Travel ...... 2,264 1,812 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 16,076 Rent, Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 21 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 378 Telephone ...... 99 27 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1,626 Postage ...... 1,496 3,717 9,479 9,479 9,479 9,479 9,479 9,479 9,479 9,479 9,479 9,479 100,000 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 836 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 11,951 Total 24,771 27,661 32,813 32,813 32,813 32,813 32,813 32,813 32,813 32,813 32,813 32,813 380,558

Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Deficit (88,558)

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 17-Feb-16

SALARIES:

Shroyer, Bryan ...... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 84,000

District

Choi, Linette...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 39,300

Total 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 249,468

Projections are based on i"nformation at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. CALIFORNIA STATE ASSEMBLY REPORTING PERIOD 12/1/15 to 11/30/16 For Assembly Member Young Kim FOR DECEMBER 2015 1ST MONTH CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL YEAR-TO-DA TE

Staff Salary ...... 15,014 5,775 20,789 20,789 Member Travel In-State ...... o o o o Out-of-State ...... o o o o Staff Travel In-State ...... 1,928 336 2,264 2,264 Out-of-State ...... 0 0 0 o Auto ...... 0 0 0 o Maintenance & Utilities ...... 7 0 7 7 Telephone ...... 18 81 99 99 Postage ...... 1,496 0 1,496 1,496 Furniture & Equipment...... 0 0 0 o Supplies & Miscellaneous ...... 90 25 115 115 ------TOTAL 18,553 6,217 24,771 24,771 ======~

ANNUAL BASE ALLOWANCE 292,000

REMAINING BASE ALLOWANCE 267,229

PERCENT OF YEAR COMPLETED 8.3%

PERCENT OF BASE ALLOWANCE EXPENDED 8.5%

NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE

Accounting Adjustment...... o o o o Member Travel & Per Diem Session TraveL ...... o o o o Mileage Reimbursement...... o o o o Non-Session Per Diem ...... o o o o D. O. Rent...... o 3,057 3,057 3,057 Lease Car Expenses Gas & OiL ...... o o o o Maintenance ...... o o o o

TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE o 3,057 3,057 3,057

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18,553 9,274 27,828 I 27,828 CSLA Cash Books Date: 20-JAN-16 16:46:58 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 2 Current Period: DEC-15

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ DEC-15 DEC-15 DEC-15

15,014 5,775 20,789 20,789 ------TOTAL STAFF SALARIES 15,014 5,775 20,789 20,789

MEMBER TRAVEL IN STATE 0 0 0 ° STAFF PER DIEM IN STATE 443 4'43 443 STAFF TRAVEL IN STATE 1,485 °0 1 ,485 1 , 485 S1 DISTRICT OFFICE MILEAGE 0 336 336 336 STl., CAR RENTAL 0 0 0 ------° ------TOTAL STAFF TRAVEL I/S 1,928 336 2,264 2,264

BOTTLED WATER 7 0 7 7 ------TOTAL MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES 7 ° 7 7

LONG DISTANCE 13 45 58 58 MONTHLY SERVICE 0 36 36 36 MESSAGE UNITS 5 5 5 ------° ------~ - - - - - TOTAL TELEPHONE 18 81 99 99

POSTAGE - METERED 119 0 119 119 POSTAGE STAMPS 0 0 0 POSTAGE EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT SERVICES 347 0 347 347 COMM POSTAGE BULK RATE METERED 1 , 030 0 1,030 1 , 030 ------_'OTAL POSTAGE 1,496 ° 1,496 1,496

BUSINESS CARDS 49 0 49 49 GOLD SEALS 18 0 18 18 RESOLUTIONS 24 0 24 24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0 25 25 25 ------TOTAL SUPPLIES & MISCELLANEOUS 90 2 5 115 115

------TOTAL CHARGED AGAINST BASE 18,553 6,217 24,771 24,771

MEMBER SESSION TRAVEL 0 0 ° 0 RENT - OFFICE 0 3,057 3,057 3,057 CSLA Cash Books Date : 20-JAN-16 16:46:58 CSA - MONTHLY MEMBER REPORT Page: 3 Current Period: DEC-IS

Currency: USD Member=433 (Young Kim) CAPITOL DISTRICT TOTAL Y-T-D OBJ DEC-IS DEC-IS DEC-IS

TOTAL D. O. RENT ° 3,057 3,057 3,057 TOTAL LEASE CAR MAINTENANCE ° o o TOTAL NOT CHARGED AGAINST BASE ALLOWANCE ° 3,057 3,057 3,057 TG EXPENDITURES 18,553 9,274 27,828 27,828 Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 1 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 -11/30/16) 22-Jan-16

Staff Salary ...... 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 249,468 Member Travel ...... 0 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 660 Staff Travel ...... 2,264 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 15,464 Rent, Maint. & Utilities ...... 7 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 392 Telephone ...... 99 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1,749 Postage ...... 1,496 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 3,600 Furniture & Equipment ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies & Misc ...... 115 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 12,215 Total 24,771 23,525 23,525 23,525 23,525 23,525 23,525 23,525 23,525 23,525 23,525 23,525 283,548

Base Allowance 292,000 Estimated 11/30/16 Balance 8,452

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. Assemblymember Kim (65) Page 2 Projected Expenditures (12/1/15 - 11/30/16) 22-Jan-16

SALARIES: Capitol

Kammerich, Leigh ...... 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 5,280 63,360 Leonard, Elena ...... 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 2,734 32,808 Marin, Alex Whitford ...... 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 30,000 Shroyer, Bryan ...... 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 84,000

District Choi, Linette...... 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 3,275 39,300

Total 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 20,789 249,468

Projections are based on information at hand and are subject to modification as actual data are received. MEMBERSESSION DATE RANGE REPORT 01-JAN-15 TO 05-0CT-16 weekly_session_daterng . rdf v6 .0 Database: ARPROD1

Report run on: October 5, 2016 10:30 AM

District 65 KIM, YOUNG ACTIVE? Y Paid Method: (as of report run date) EFT Week of Session/ Session Paid ADJ Rate Amount Trans Waive/Absent CS Number/ ADJ Period Days Days Days Sup Payment #

01/05/15 - 01/10/15 6 6 168 $1,008.00 EFT A0544 .01/11/15 - 01/17/15 7 6 168 $1,008.00 EFT 15 A0545 01/18/15 - 01/24/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0546 01/25/15 - 01/31/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0547 02/01/15 - 02/07/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0548 02/08/15 - 02/14/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0549 02/15/15 - 02/21/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0550 02/22/15 - 02/28/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0551 03/01/15 - 03/07/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0552 03/08/15 - 03/14/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0553 03/15/15 - 03/21/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0554 03/22/15 - 03/26/15 5 5 168 $840.00 EFT A0555 04/06/15 - 04/11/15 6 6 168 $1,008.00 EFT A0556 04/12/15 - 04/18/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0557 04/19/15 - 04/25/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0558 04/26/15 - 05/02/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0559 05/03/15 - 05/09/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0560 05/10/15 - 05/16/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0561 05/17/15 - OS/23/15 7 4 168 $672.00 EFT 17 , 18 ,1 9 A0562 OS/24/15 - 05/30/15 7 7 168 $1 ,176.00 EFT A0563 05/31/15 - 06/06/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0564 06/07/15 - 06/13/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0565 06/14/15 - 06/20/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0566 06/21/15 - 06/27/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0567 06/28/15 - 06/30/15 3 3 168 $504.00 EFT A0568 07/01/15 - 07/04/15 4 4 168 $672.00 EFT A0569 07/05/15 - 07/11/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0570 07/12/15 - 07/16/15 5 5 168 $840.00 EFT A0571 08/17/15 - 08/22/15 6 6 168 $1,008.00 EFT A0572 08/23/15 - 08/29/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0573 08/30/15 - 09/05/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0574 09/06/15 - 09/12/15 7 7 168 $1,176.00 EFT A0575 01/04/16 - 01/09/16 6 6 176 $1,056.00 EFT A0576 01/10/16 - 01/16/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0577 01/17/16 - 01/23/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0578 01/24/16 - 01/30/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0579 01/31/16 - 02/06/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0580 02/07/16 - 02/13/16 7 5 176 $880.00 EFT 10,11 A0581 02/14/16 - 02/20/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0582 02/21/16 - 02/27/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0583 02/28/16 - 03/05/16 7 6 176 $1,056.00 EFT 02 A0584 03/06/16 - 03/12/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0585 03/13/16 - 03/17/16 5 5 176 $880.00 EFT A0586 03/28/16 - 04/02/16 6 6 176 $1,056.00 EFT A0587 04/03/16 - 04/09/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0588 04/10/16 - 04/16/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0589 04/17/16 - 04/23/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0590

Page 1 MEMBER SESSION DATE RANGE REPORT 01-JAN-15 TO 05-0CT-16 weekly_session_daterng.rdf v6.0 Database: ARPRODI

Report run on: October 5, 2016 10:30 AM

District 65 KIM, YOUNG ACTIVE? Y Paid Method: (as of report run date) EFT

W'e.ek of Session/ Session Paid ADJ Rate Amount Trans Waive/Absent CS Number/ ADJ Period Days Days Days Sup Payment #

04/24/16 - 04/30/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0591 05/01/16 - 05/07/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0592 05/08/16 - 05/14/16 7 6 176 $1,056.00 EFT 11 A0593 05/15/16 - OS/21/16 7 6 176 $1,056.00 EFT 17 A0594 OS/22/16 - OS/28/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0595 OS/29/16 - 06/04/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0596 06/05/16 - 06/11/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0597 06/12/16 - 06/18/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0598 06/19/16 - 06/25/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0599 06/26/16 - 06/30/16 5 5 176 $880.00 EFT A0600 08/01/16 - 08/06/16 6 6 176 $1,056.00 EFT A0601 08/07/16 - 08/13/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0602 08/14/16 - 08/20/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0603 08/21/16 - 08/27/16 7 7 176 $1,232.00 EFT A0604 08/28/16 - 09/01/16 5 5 176 $880.00 EFT A0605

Session Total: 411 402 $69,104.00

Adjustment Total: $0.00

( Member Total: ~------~--~------~)411 402 $69,104.00

Page 2 Kim Young Assembly Member Salary History

Monthly Salary Effective Date Description

Voluntary Salary Reduction - California Citizens $7,940.91 1/1/2015 - 12/6/2015 V'" Compensation Commission Salary Rate $8,099.75

Voluntary Salary Reduction - California Citizens ./ $7,940.91 12/7/2015 - 12/31/2015 Compensation Commission Salary Rate $8,342.75

Voluntary Salary Reduction - California Citizens .,/ $7,940.91 1/1/2016 - Present Compensation Commission Salary Rate $8,342.75 Assemblymember Yong Kim's Staff

Full Name Start Date End Date Last Monthly Sala!l Choi, Linette 12/29/14 3930.00 Hughes, Jonathan Theodore 12/01/14 10/16/15 3010.00 Kammerick, Leigh Amber 01/02/15 5544.00 Leonard, Elena Marie Dolores 12/01/14 2734.00 Marin, Alex Witford 02/10/15 3010.00 Shroyer, Bryan Jay 04/01/15 7560.00

Prepared by: Assembly Rules Committee - Fiscal Office Date Prepared: 9/23/2016 Source: Payroll Records Year Destination Per Diem Transportation Total 2003 South Korea $1,244 $3,485.92 $4,729.92 2004 South Korea $1,080 - $1,080 2004 Hong Kong $987 $6,110.45 $7,107.45 2004 South Korea $844 - $844 2004 Mongolia $549 - $549 2004 Russia $1,707 $6,564 $8,271 2005 South Korea $1,704 - $1,704 2005 Japan $1,632 $6,246.08 $7,878.08 Total $9,747 $22,406.45 $32,153.45