DOCSLIB.ORG

Proquest Disserststions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proquest Disserststions RIGHTLY OR FOR ILL: THE ETHICS OF REMEMBERING AND FORGETTING By Alison Nicole Crane Reiheld A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Philosophy 2010 UMI Number: 3435221 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, If material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3435221 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 1 7, United States Code. ProQuest® ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT RIGHTLY OR FOR ILL: THE ETHICS OF REMEMBERING AND FORGETTING By Alison Nicole Crane Reiheld Forgetting a birthday, a wedding anniversary, a beloved child's school play or a dear colleague's important accomplishments is often met with blame, whereas remembering them can engender praise. Are we in fact blameworthy or praiseworthy for such remembering and forgetting? When ought we to remember, in the ethical sense of 'ought'? And ought we in some cases to allow ourselves to forget? These are the questions that ground this philosophical work. In fact, we so often unreflectively assign moral blame and praise to ourselves and others for memory behaviors that this faculty, and moral responsibility for it, deserve careful philosophical attention. These questions of blameworthiness and praiseworthiness for memory do not pertain only to individual memory behaviors. Collective memory behaviors may also be morally blameworthy or praiseworthy. Consider the matters of how South Africans go about remembering apartheid, how Bosnian Serbs and Albanian Muslims go about remembering their conflicts, or whether and how Americans "never forget" September 11,2001. In fact, individual and collective memory are not as separate as you might think. Though individual memory is based in the individual's biology—the functions of the brain—individuals are members of collectives; our individual memories are both shaped by social interaction to a surprising degree and major loci of collective memory. Thus, determining moral blameworthiness or praiseworthiness for memory behaviors is a complicated philosophical endeavor. To address these issues, I set myself three tasks. First, to analyze the nature of both individual and collective memory using philosophical, neuropsychological, sociological sources. This reveals that both individual and collective memory are best conceived as constructions, not necessarily inaccurate, but certainly not perfect recordings of events. Individual memory constructions are influenced not only by our choices, but also by neurological and social determinants. Individuals are one locus for collective memory storage—others include memorials, books, songs, and national holidays—and are agents for collective memory construction. My second task is to analyze moral responsibility, specifically what makes us praiseworthy and blameworthy. Ultimately, I reject libertarian conceptions of moral responsibility and adopt Nomy Arpaly's influential reasons-responsiveness which holds that the moral worth of an agent depends on the moral desirability of an action and the degree of moral concern with which she pursues it. My third task is to apply this analysis to both individual and collective memory behaviors. In doing so, I generate a preliminary set of twelve rules for both individual and collective memory behaviors, each defeasible under conditions that change whether, and the degree to which, moral agents should be held praiseworthy or blameworthy. I intend that these twelve rules and their attendant considerations of application and defeasibility provide not only philosophers but moral agents more generally with useful tools for a reflective ethics of memory. By such means may we all remember and forget rightly, and not for ill. Copyright by ALISON NICOLE CRANE REIHELD 2010 I dedicate this work to my husband Bert and my sons Robbie and Alexander who have supported me as I dedicated myself to the task of researching and writing this dissertation; for Robbie in particular, whose memory for the trivial and important is a joy, and whose memory for transgressions—real or perceived—keeps me on my toes; and for wee Alexander, who will see far more of me now. We are who we are because of what we remember and have forgotten about the world. ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without the specific support of a number of folks. To them, I offer my gratitude and appreciation. To the Lyman Briggs College at Michigan State University—staff, faculty, and administrators—whose material and moral support during the early stages of the writing provided a place for me to work, equipment and supplies with which to do so, and the encouragement to complete the task. To my colleagues at in the Department of Philosophy at Southern Illinois University - Edwardsville who supported me as I began a new position while completing this work and have welcomed me as a peer. And last but by no means least, to my dissertation committee—Tom Tomlinson, Tamra Frei, Rob Pennock, and Jim Nelson—whose own work and their expectations of mine have prompted me to achieve what I hope is one of the best versions of this work in all the possible worlds in which I have completed it. Vl TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1 . 1 Motivation for the Project and Framing 2 1 .2 Memory as Morally Significant 7 1.3 Cases 9 1 .4 Moral Worth and Moral Desirability 15 1.5 What This Dissertation Is Not and What It Is 20 CHAPTER 2 THE NATURE OF MEMORY 24 2.1 Early Philosophical Investigations of Memory 26 2.2 Memory in Science, Psychology, and Sociology 33 2.2. 1 Memory in individual humans 35 2.2. 1 .A Declarative Memory 36 2.2. 1 .B Non-Declarative Memory 43 2.2.1 .C O Memory! Thou fond deceiver: Errors in Declarative Memory.. ..46 2.3 When Individuals and Collectives Interact 57 2.4 Individual Memory Beyond the Brain 62 2.5 Collective Memory 65 2.5.1 Some Mechanisms of Collective Memory 77 2.5.1 .A Screen Memories 77 2.5.1 .B Distanciation 80 2.5.1 .C Instrumentalization 83 2.5.1 .D Narrativization 85 2.5.1 .E Cognitivization and Conventionalization 87 2.5.1 .F Testimony and Tribunal 89 2.6 Summary of Individual and Collective Aspects of Memory 91 2.7 The Ontology of Memory 92 2.8 Conclusion 97 CHAPTER 3 MORAL RESPONSIBILITY, PRAISE, AND BLAME 101 3.1 The Principle of Alternate Possibilities: A modern version of the classically appealing choice-based autonomous theory of moral responsibility 1 05 3 .2 Beyond Volitional Accounts of Moral Responsibility 121 3.2.1 Nomy Arpaly's Distinction Between Moral Desirability and Moral Worthl21 3.2.2 Reasons-Responsiveness and Moral Worth: The Key to Responsibility.... 126 VII 3.2.3 What We Are Responsible For 131 3.2.4 Blameworthiness and Praiseworthiness Are About Warrant, Not Whether It Is Desirable to Blame or Praise 135 3.2.5 Different Degrees of Praiseworthiness and Blameworthiness Exist 137 3.3 The Upshot 139 CHAPTER 4 MORAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MEMORY 141 4.1 Moral Desirability, Moral Worth, and Moral Saints with Respect to Memory. 143 4.2 Moral Blameworthiness and Praiseworthiness for Individual Memory 149 4.2.1 What Came Before: literature on the ethics of memory 1 49 4.2.2 The Moral Desirability and Worth of Individual Memory 1 57 4.3 Moral Blameworthiness and Praiseworthiness for Collective Memory 1 87 4.4 Conclusion 205 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 208 5.1 The Story So Far 208 5.2 Implications for Other Matters 209 5.2.1 Neuroethics 209 5.2.2 The Ethics of Ethical Expertise 213 5.2.3 Some Ethical Dimensions of Social and Political Philosophy 214 5.3 Toward a Reflective Ethics of Memory 218 BIBLIOGRAPHY 219 VlIl Chapter 1: Introduction We are the sum ofthe stories we tell ourselves, and those stories are necessarily rooted in our experience, and by how we choose to interpret the experiences ofothers. These mechanics ofmemory create a new, present reality that then determines thefuture... the future and the past and the present are all mixed up together. What we choose to remember is critical, since the narratives thatplay in our heads shape everything. — John Meacham, "The Stories We Tell Ourselves" (my emphasis) This dissertation deals with moral responsibility, blame, and praise for both individual and collective memory. The two are not as separate as you might think, for though individual memory is based in the individual's biology—the functions of the brain—it is also the case that individuals are members of collectives and that our individual memories are shaped by social interaction to a surprising degree. Once we begin considering how collectives influence individual memory, it is a very short path to asking how individuals influence collective memory and to considering collective memory in and of itself. This makes moral agency for memory—whether individual or collective—a very complex thing. Thus, determining moral blameworthiness or praiseworthiness for memory behaviors also becomes complex. I intend to perform a task with regard to individual memory and moral responsibility that philosophers generally do quite well. That is, to take something we have thought to be quite simple or unremarkable, to reveal that it is complicated, and then 1 to make some headway towards resolving those complications. When I do this for non- philosophers in teaching or in scholarship, they often say, "You're making it harder than it has to be." My response is, "You're making it simpler than it is." And while persons often get away with making things simpler than they are, it is a spectacularly bad idea to try when dealing with matters of import such as health care, justifications for war, or subjects for which we commonly blame and praise each other unreflectively, such as memory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rhythms of the Brain
    Rhythms of the Brain György Buzsáki OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Rhythms of the Brain This page intentionally left blank Rhythms of the Brain György Buzsáki 1 2006 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2006 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Buzsáki, G. Rhythms of the brain / György Buzsáki. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13 978-0-19-530106-9 ISBN 0-19-530106-4 1. Brain—Physiology. 2. Oscillations. 3. Biological rhythms. [DNLM: 1. Brain—physiology. 2. Cortical Synchronization. 3. Periodicity. WL 300 B992r 2006] I. Title. QP376.B88 2006 612.8'2—dc22 2006003082 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To my loved ones. This page intentionally left blank Prelude If the brain were simple enough for us to understand it, we would be too sim- ple to understand it.
    [Show full text]
  • *For All Comprehensive Exam Sections, DO NOT Attempt Answering a Question Unless You Really Know the Answer
    *For all comprehensive exam sections, DO NOT attempt answering a question unless you really know the answer. You will be much less likely to pass if you provide information that does not actually address a question (even if the information you provide is technically accurate, and could be used to answer another question). Also, most questions (except Statistics) will require you to cite original sources to support your arguments, but please do not cite a textbook. Cognition and Learning Section This exam is tied most directly to PSY 620 and 621. You are not allowed to attempt this exam until you have passed both of these courses. You will see questions covering such topics as (in no particular order of importance): perception, attention, working memory, episodic versus semantic versus procedural long- term memory, implicit versus explicit memory, automatic versus controlled processing, categorization, social cognition, metacognition, theories of learning and behavior, eyewitness memory, language, decision-making and problem-solving, expertise, and developmental/age issues concerning memory. By far the most important thing to study is an undergraduate textbook in cognitive psychology (e.g., Goldstein; Reisberg; Robinson-Riegler; Sternberg), as well as notes and materials from PSY 620. Below is an example question (no longer used) with a good student response. It will give you an idea of the level of detail needed for a good response, and how to cite original sources to support your statements. You are an eyewitness to a crime in which a man robs a liquor store. He does so in under 5 minutes while pointing a gun at the clerk, is not wearing a mask or anything else to hide his face, and he quickly runs away after the robbery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Creation of Neuroscience
    The Creation of Neuroscience The Society for Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity 1969-1995 Introduction rom the molecular biology of a single neuron to the breathtakingly complex circuitry of the entire human nervous system, our understanding of the brain and how it works has undergone radical F changes over the past century. These advances have brought us tantalizingly closer to genu- inely mechanistic and scientifically rigorous explanations of how the brain’s roughly 100 billion neurons, interacting through trillions of synaptic connections, function both as single units and as larger ensem- bles. The professional field of neuroscience, in keeping pace with these important scientific develop- ments, has dramatically reshaped the organization of biological sciences across the globe over the last 50 years. Much like physics during its dominant era in the 1950s and 1960s, neuroscience has become the leading scientific discipline with regard to funding, numbers of scientists, and numbers of trainees. Furthermore, neuroscience as fact, explanation, and myth has just as dramatically redrawn our cultural landscape and redefined how Western popular culture understands who we are as individuals. In the 1950s, especially in the United States, Freud and his successors stood at the center of all cultural expla- nations for psychological suffering. In the new millennium, we perceive such suffering as erupting no longer from a repressed unconscious but, instead, from a pathophysiology rooted in and caused by brain abnormalities and dysfunctions. Indeed, the normal as well as the pathological have become thoroughly neurobiological in the last several decades. In the process, entirely new vistas have opened up in fields ranging from neuroeconomics and neurophilosophy to consumer products, as exemplified by an entire line of soft drinks advertised as offering “neuro” benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective
    Review Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective 1, 2 3 William Hirst, * Jeremy K. Yamashiro, and Alin Coman Social scientists have studied collective memory for almost a century, but psy- Highlights chological analyses have only recently emerged. Although no singular approach Collective memories can involve small communities, such as couples, to the psychological study of collective memory exists, research has largely: (i) families, or neighborhood associa- exploredthe social representations of history, including generational differences; tions, or large communities, such as nations, the world-wide congregation (ii) probed for the underlying cognitive processes leading to the formation of of Catholics, or terrorist groups such collective memories, adopting either a top-down or bottom-up approach; and (iii) as ISIS. They bear on the collective explored how people live in history and transmit personal memories of historical identity of the community. importance acrossgenerations.Here,wediscussthesedifferent approaches and Many studies focus on either the repre- highlight commonalities and connections between them. sentation of extant collective memories or the formation and retention of either extant or new collective memories. Memories Held Across a Community Members of a community often share similar memories: Germans know that their country Those interested in the formation of participated in the mass murder of Jews; Catholics, that Jesus fasted for 40 days; and a family, collective memories can approach ’ that grandfather immigrated from Ireland. Such collective memories can shape a community s the topic in a top-down or bottom- up fashion. ’ identity and its actions. Germany s struggles to come to terms with its troublesome past, for fi instance, de ne to a great extent how Germans see themselves today as Germans [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Wandering Mind What the Brain Does When You Are Not Looking the University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2015, Pp
    Michael C. Corballis The Wandering Mind What the Brain Does When You are Not Looking The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2015, pp. 184 It is commonplace to consider mind-wandering as a secondary, useless ac- tivity of our mind to which we guiltily abandon ourselves for laziness or dis- traction. The aim of the book is to show that, far from being the slaves of a blamable indolence, every time we are absent-minded or lost in thought, we are involved in an essential mental activity. Not only is mind-wandering a funda- mental component of our life (whether we want it or not, our mind meanders at night and for half the time during the day), but it also has a constructive and adaptive function that is crucial for facing the contingencies of a complex world. Without a wandering mind we would be stuck in the present, unable to invent stories and to escape the here and now through mental time travel. Mind-wandering takes us into unexplored regions of the unconscious mind that are inaccessible to the conscious will. Not only does this capacity allows us to build and consolidate the sense of our personality but it also helps to multiply our self into imagined possible selves and to expand the range of our experience. Creativity, too, lies in the randomness of mind-wandering, which makes possible unpredictable connections of ideas. The book therefore takes into account different forms of mind-wandering. Mental traveling depends on memory, which provides the material that feeds our imagination. Memory is so important to mind-wandering that some syn- dromes, such as amnesia and hyperthymesia, can impair the ability to mind- travel.
    [Show full text]
  • How Big Is Human Memory, Or on Being Just Useful Enough
    Downloaded from learnmem.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Yadin Dudai How Big Is Human Memory, Department of Neur0bi010gy or On Being Just Useful Enough The Weizmann Institute of Science Reh0v0t 76100 Israel We are, in many respects, what we remember. But how much do we do? So far, science has provided only a very partial answer to this riddle. The magical number seven, plus or minus two, seems to constrain the capacity of our immediate memory (Miller 1956). But surely its constraints dissipate when memories settle in long-term stores. Yet how big are these stores? If we combine all of our factual knowledge and personal reminiscence, childhood scenes and memories of the past day, intimate experiences and professional expertisemhow many items are there, that, combined together, mold us into unique individuals? The answer is not simple, and neither is the question. For example, what is an item in long-term memory? And how can we measure it, being sure that we unveil memory capacity and not merely the occasional ability to tap it? Such theoretical and practical difficulties, no doubt, have contributed to the fact that the capacity of human memory is still an enigma. Yet, despite the inherent and undeniable complexities, the issue deserves to be retrieved, once in a while, from the oblivions of the collective memory of the scientific community. (For a selection of earlier discussions of the size of human long-term memory, see Galton 1879; Landauer 1986; Crovitz et al. 1991.) Folk Psychology and When confronted with the issue, many tend to provide an intuitive Early Views estimate of the size of their memory, based either on belief or introspection or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective
    Int J Polit Cult Soc (2009) 22:125–141 DOI 10.1007/s10767-009-9057-9 Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective Alin Coman & Adam D. Brown & Jonathan Koppel & William Hirst Published online: 26 May 2009 # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009 Abstract The study of collective memory has burgeoned in the last 20 years, so much so that one can even detect a growing resistance to what some view as the imperialistic march of memory studies across the social sciences (e.g., Berliner 2005;Fabian1999). Yet despite its clear advance, one area that has remained on the sidelines is psychology. On the one hand, this disinterest is surprising, since memory is of central concern to psychologists. On the other hand, the relative absence of the study of collective memory within the discipline of psychology seems to suit both psychology and other disciplines of the social sciences, for reasons that will be made clear. This paper explores how psychology might step from the sidelines and contribute meaningfully to discussions of collective memory. It reviews aspects of the small literature on the psychology of collective memoryandconnectsthisworktothelargerscholarly community’sinterestincollectivememory. Keywords Social contagion . Memory restructuring . Collective memory . Collective forgetting General Comments Contextualizing the Study of Collective Memory Why not has psychology figured prominently in discussions of collective memory? For those in social science fields other than psychology, the methodological individualism of The first three authors contributed equally to this paper. The order in which they are listed reflects the throw of a die. A. Coman : J. Koppel : W. Hirst (*) The New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011, USA e-mail: [email protected] A.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Memory and Attention in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain with Healthy People
    October 2015, Volume 3, Number 4 Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Memory and Attention in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain with Healthy People Mehdi Mehraban Eshtehardi 1, Hassan Shams Esfandabad 2*, Peyman Hassani Abharian 3 1. Department of General Psychology, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. 2. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran. 3. Institute for Cognitive Science Studies, Tehran, Iran. Article info: A B S T R A C T Received: 18 Mar. 2015 Accepted: 29 Jul. 2015 Objective: The present study aimed to compare prospective and retrospective memory impairment and attention deficit in people suffering from chronic low back pain with those cognitive functions in healthy subjects. Furthermore, this study examines the relation between severity and duration of pain and prospective and retrospective memory impairment and attention deficit. Methods: The research was a causality-comparative study. Using convenience sampling method, 53 male patients and 53 healthy male individuals were selected. The participants were asked to fill out prospective and retrospective memory questionnaire and pain numeric rating scale (NRS). In addition, a continuous performance test was performed. The study hypotheses were tested using two independent group T-test and the Pearson correlation analysis by SPSS 22 with the significant level of 0.05. Results: The results showed that there was significant difference between the 2 groups of participants regarding prospective memory, but no significant difference regarding retrospective Keywords: memory. With respect to hypotheses, significant difference was found between the two groups Chronic pain, regarding attention. And finally results of the study did not show any relation between duration and intensity of pain with impairment in prospective and retrospective memory and attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Psychoanalysis Michael P
    Migratory psychoanalysis MICHAEL P. STEINBERG Brown University In September 2004 I participated in a conference in La plata, Argentina, on the topic of “the State and the politics of Memory: Archives, Museums, and Education.”1 the conference was convened by the comisión provincial por la Memoria, an authority commissioned in 2000 by the provincial government of Buenos Aires (whose capital is La plata) with the task of developing a public and comparative discourse of Vergangenheitsbewaeltigung, or coming to terms with the past. the Argentine past in question is the military regime that held power between 1976 and 1983, unleashing a campaign of state terrorism responsible for the murder of 30,000 citizens, with a severe overrepresentation, in increasing order, of youth, secondary school and university students, and Jews. the city of La plata boasts an important university; as a result, the violence there was especially severe. the comisión por la Memoria is housed in a former police headquarters known to the citizens of La plata as a site of torture and other hor- rors. Its task includes the preservation and dissemination of the archive of the state security forces (dIpBA), containing 3,800,000 files as well as other materials, including, for example, 160 recordings of bugged telephone conversations.2 to my surprise and, I must confess, to my relief, the large public audience proved quite interested in the topic of my own contribution: discourses and sites of public memory and history in Berlin. As it turns out, a delegation from the comisión por la Memoria was about to travel to Berlin to consult with analogous scholars and archivists there, specifically with the archivists of the Stasi files.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Prospective Memory in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury [Pre-Print]
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Faculty Scholarship 4-2-2018 A review of prospective memory in individuals with acquired brain injury [pre-print] Sarah Raskin Trinity College, [email protected] Jasmin Williams Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Emily M. Aiken Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/facpub A Review of Prospective Memory in Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury Sarah A. Raskin1,2, Jasmin Williams1, and Emily M. Aiken1 1Neuroscience Program, Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut 2Department of Psychology, Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut address for correspondence: Sarah Raskin Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program 300 Summit Street Hartford CT, USA [email protected] Prospective Memory and Brain injury 2 Abstract Objective: Prospective memory (PM) deficits have emerged as an important predictor of difficulty in daily life for individuals with acquired brain injury (BI). This review examines the variables that have been found to influence PM performance in this population. In addition, current methods of assessment are reviewed with a focus on clinical measures. Finally, cognitive rehabilitation therapies (CRT) are reviewed, including compensatory, restorative and metacognitive approaches. Method: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Liberati, 2009) were used to identify studies. Studies were added that were identified from the reference lists of these. Results: Research has begun to elucidate the contributing variables to PM deficits after BI, such as attention, executive function and retrospective memory components. Imaging studies have identified prefrontal deficits, especially in the region of BA10 as contributing to these deficits.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement Or Self-Depletion?
    HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY published: 05 April 2018 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00469 Memory-Modulation: Self-Improvement or Self-Depletion? Andrea Lavazza* Neuroethics, Centro Universitario Internazionale, Arezzo, Italy Autobiographical memory is fundamental to the process of self-construction. Therefore, the possibility of modifying autobiographical memories, in particular with memory-modulation and memory-erasing, is a very important topic both from the theoretical and from the practical point of view. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the state of the art of some of the most promising areas of memory-modulation and memory-erasing, considering how they can affect the self and the overall balance of the “self and autobiographical memory” system. Indeed, different conceptualizations of the self and of personal identity in relation to autobiographical memory are what makes memory-modulation and memory-erasing more or less desirable. Because of the current limitations (both practical and ethical) to interventions on memory, I can Edited by: only sketch some hypotheses. However, it can be argued that the choice to mitigate Rossella Guerini, painful memories (or edit memories for other reasons) is somehow problematic, from an Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Italy ethical point of view, according to some of the theories of the self and personal identity Reviewed by: in relation to autobiographical memory, in particular for the so-called narrative theories Tillmann Vierkant, University of Edinburgh, of personal identity, chosen here as the main case of study. Other conceptualizations of United Kingdom the “self and autobiographical memory” system, namely the constructivist theories, do Antonella Marchetti, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, not have this sort of critical concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mind's Storehouse
    Lesson 12 (Memory) The Mind’s Storehouse Assignments Reading: Chapter 9, “Memory” in Psychology by David Myers (Modules 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 in the modular version of Psychology) Video: Episode 12, “The Mind’s Storehouse” LEARNING OUTCOMES Familiarize yourself with the Learning Outcomes for this Storage: Retaining Information lesson before you begin the assignments. Return to them (Module 26) to check your learning after completing the Steps to Learning Success. Careful work on these materials should 8. Compare the capacity and duration of storage for equip you to accomplish the outcomes. iconic and echoic sensory memory, short-term memory, and long-term memory, and describe the The Phenomenon of Memory relationship between these processes. (Module 24) 9. Summarize evidence relating memory to neural processes, brain areas, and hormones. 1. Describe examples and cases that illustrate the extremes of memory and forgetting. 10. Describe and compare implicit and explicit memory, and offer examples of each. 2. Explain encoding, storage, and retrieval and discuss the relationships among these processes. Retrieval: Getting Information Out 3. Summarize the basic features of the three-stage (Module 27) information processing model developed by Atkinson and Shiffrin. 11. Distinguish between recall, recognition, and relearn- ing tests of memory, and provide examples of each. Encoding: Getting Information In 12. Identify and discuss retrieval cues, context effects, (Module 25) and state-dependent and mood-congruent memory. 13. List and explain the mechanisms involved in for- 4. Distinguish between automatic and effortful informa- getting, providing examples and evidence for each. tion processing, and provide examples of each. 5.
    [Show full text]