DOCSLIB.ORG

Escalante River Watershed Use Attainability Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Escalante River Watershed Use Attainability Analysis EESSCCAALLAANNTTEE RRIIVVEERR USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSIS Prepared For: Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Quality Carl Adams Harry Lewis Judd Project Manager Project Supervisor Prepared By: MSE Millennium Science & Engineering, Inc. Pocket Water Inc. ESCALANTE RIVER WATERSHED USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Document Organization.................................................................... 1 1.2 The TMDL Process...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Utah’s Watershed Approach ........................................................................................ 2 1.4 Watershed Characterization......................................................................................... 4 1.4.1 Location and Population................................................................................ 4 1.4.2 Surface Water Hydrology.............................................................................. 6 1.4.3 Land Use/Ownership and Land Cover .......................................................... 7 1.4.4 Vegetation Characteristics............................................................................. 8 1.4.5 Climate........................................................................................................... 8 1.4.6 Hydrogeology ................................................................................................ 9 1.4.7 Fisheries Information..................................................................................... 9 2.0 WATER QUALITY CRITERIA...................................................................................... 11 2.1 Beneficial Uses and 303(d) Listed Section ................................................................ 11 2.2 Water Quality Standards ............................................................................................ 12 3.0 IMPAIRMENT ANALYSIS............................................................................................. 13 3.1 Geographic Extent of the Water Quality Management Plan...................................... 13 3.2 Water Quality and Flow Data .................................................................................... 13 3.2.1 Water Quality Data in STORET.................................................................. 13 3.2.2 USGS Flow Data ......................................................................................... 16 3.3 Water Quality Analysis.............................................................................................. 17 3.3.1 Summary of Water Temperature Data Collected in 2003 ........................... 17 3.3.2 Climate and Flow Considerations................................................................ 21 3.3.3 Utah State University Data Series ............................................................... 23 4.0 USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSIS............................................................................... 26 4.1 Reach Differentiation................................................................................................. 26 4.2 Use-Attainability........................................................................................................ 26 4.3 Loading Assessment .................................................................................................. 27 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION PLANS AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES............. 29 5.1 Statement of Need...................................................................................................... 30 5.1.1 Project Water Quality Priority..................................................................... 30 5.1.2 Project Goals................................................................................................ 31 5.1.3 Objectives and Tasks ................................................................................... 31 5.1.4 Best Management Practices......................................................................... 33 i 5.1.5 Permits ......................................................................................................... 33 5.1.6 Lead Sponsor............................................................................................... 33 5.1.7 Assurance of Project Operation and Maintenance....................................... 33 5.2 Coordination Plan...................................................................................................... 34 5.2.1 Lead Project Sponsor................................................................................... 34 5.2.2 Local Support............................................................................................... 34 5.2.3 Coordination and Linkages.......................................................................... 34 5.2.4 Similar Activities......................................................................................... 34 5.3 Evaluation and Monitoring Plan ................................................................................ 35 5.3.1 Sampling and Analysis Plan Goals.............................................................. 35 5.3.2 Implementation and Effectiveness Monitoring ........................................... 36 5.3.3 Trend Monitoring.........................................................................................37 5.4 Long-Term Funding Plans for Operation and Maintenance ...................................... 38 5.5 Public Involvement .................................................................................................... 38 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 39 7.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. 43 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Watershed Characteristics within the Escalante Study Area ........................................ 6 Table 1-2 Landownership Patterns in the Escalante Study Area .................................................. 7 Table 1-3 Monthly Climate Summaries for Escalante Utah Station 1971 to 2000....................... 8 Table 2-1 303(d) Listed Section of the Escalante River ............................................................. 11 Table 2-2 303(d) Criteria for Assessing Aquatic Life - Beneficial Support Class 3A................ 12 Table 3-1 Available Water Temperature Data from STORET Stations within or Near the Listed Section ............................................................................................................. 14 Table 3-2 Applicable Water Temperature Data from STORET Stations Within or Near the Listed Section ....................................................................................................... 15 Table 3-3 USGS Gaging Stations in the Escalante Study Area .................................................. 16 Table 3-4 2003 Temperature Monitoring Stations with Acceptable Data Quality ..................... 17 Table 3-5 Comparison of 2003 Summer Water Temperature Results to Water Quality Criteria........................................................................................................................ 19 Table 3-6 Average Monthly Maximum Air Temperature for Escalante, Utah........................... 22 Table 3-7 Aquatic Monitoring Center Water Temperature Monitoring Stations........................ 23 Table 3-8 Escalante River at Escalante, Utah Comparison of Daily Maximum Water Temperature and Temperature Criteria ...................................................................... 24 Table 5-1 Suggested Station Locations for Temperature Monitoring......................................... 38 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Location of the Escalante River ................................................................................... 5 Figure 1-2 Annual Hydrograph at Escalante River near Escalante, Utah...................................... 7 Figure 1-3 Trout Habitat and Distribution of Colorado River Cutthroat Trout in the Upper Escalante River Drainage (from Hepworth, et al., 2001) ........................................... 10 Figure 3-1 Water Temperature for Escalante River below North Creek, Summer 2003............. 18 Figure 3-2 Water Temperature for Escalante River below Sand Creek, Summer 2003 .............. 18 Figure 3-3 Example of Flow and Riparian Conditions - Escalante River above Death Hollow .............. 20 Figure 3-4 Example of Flow and Riparian Conditions - Escalante River below Death Hollow.............. 20 Figure 3-5 Forty Year Monthly Average Maximum Air Temperature for Escalante, Utah ........ 21 Figure 3-6 Historical Flows Compared to 2003 Flows................................................................ 22 Figure 3-7 Escalante River Temperature near Escalante, Utah and USGS Gage Data................ 24 Figure 3-8 Escalante River Temperature near Highway 12 Bridge ............................................. 25 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1: List of Contributors Appendix 2: Map 1 Watershed Overview Map 2 General Topography Map 3 Vegetation Map 4 Land Ownership Map 5 STORET Sites and USGS Stream Gaging Station Locations Appendix 3: STORET Station Data and Statistical Summaries Appendix 4: 2003 Temperature Monitoring Plan and Results Appendix 5: USGS Stream Gage Station Monthly Flow Summaries
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Resources Within the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah
    A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT, UTAH by David B. Madsen Common rock art elements of the Fremont and Anasazi on the Colorado Plateau and the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. ,I!! CIRCULAR 95 . 1997 I~\' UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ." if;~~ 6EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ISBN 1-55791-605-5 STATE OF UTAH Michael O. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison~ Director UGS Board Member Representing Russell C. Babcock, Jr. (chairman) .................................................................................................. Mineral Industry D. Cary Smith ................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ....................................................................................................................... Civil Engineering E.H. Deedee O'Brien ......................................................................................................................... Public-at-Large C. William Berge .............................................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ..................................................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Relation of Sediment Load and Flood-Plain Formation to Climatic Variability, Paria River Drainage Basin, Utah and Arizona
    Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability, Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona JULIA B. GRAF U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, 375 S. Euclid, Tucson, Arizona 85719 ROBERT H. WEBB U.S. Geological Survey, 1675 W. Anklam Road, Tucson, Arizona 85745 RICHARD HEREFORD U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT sediment load for a given discharge declined fill that rises 1-5 m above the modern channel abruptly in the early 1940s in the Colorado bed. Flood-plain deposits are present in all Suspended-sediment load, flow volume, River at Grand Canyon (Daines, 1949; Howard, major tributaries of the Paria River. The area of and flood characteristics of the Paria River 1960; Thomas and others, 1960; Hereford, flood plains is slightly greater than 20 km2, and were analyzed to determine their relation to 1987a). The decline in suspended-sediment sediment volume is estimated to be about 40 climate and flood-plain alluviation between loads has been attributed to improved land use million m3 (Hereford, 1987c). Typically, flood 1923 and 1986. Flood-plain alluviation began and conservation measures initiated in the 1930s plains are not present in first-order drainage ba- about 1940 at a time of decreasing magnitude (Hadley, 1977). A change in sediment-sampler sins but are present in basins of second and and frequency of floods in winter, summer, type and in methods of analysis have been higher order where the stream channel is uncon- and fall. No floods with stages high enough to discounted as causes for the observed decrease fined and crosses nonresistant bedrock forma- inundate the flood plain have occurred since (Daines, 1949; Thomas and others, 1960).
    [Show full text]
  • West Colorado River Plan
    Section 9 - West Colorado River Basin Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction 9-1 9.2 Background 9-1 9.3 Water Resources Problems 9-7 9.4 Water Resources Demands and Needs 9-7 9.5 Water Development and Management Alternatives 9-13 9.6 Projected Water Depletions 9-18 9.7 Policy Issues and Recommendations 9-19 Figures 9-1 Price-San Rafael Salinity Control Project Map 9-6 9-2 Wilderness Lands 9-11 9-3 Potential Reservoir Sites 9-16 9-4 Gunnison Butte Mutual Irrigation Project 9-20 9-5 Bryce Valley 9-22 Tables 9-1 Board of Water Resources Development Projects 9-3 9-2 Salinity Control Project Approved Costs 9-7 9-3 Wilderness Lands 9-8 9-4 Current and Projected Culinary Water Use 9-12 9-5 Current and Projected Secondary Water Use 9-12 9-6 Current and Projected Agricultural Water Use 9-13 9-7 Summary of Current and Projected Water Demands 9-14 9-8 Historical Reservoir Site Investigations 9-17 Section 9 West Colorado River Basin - Utah State Water Plan Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction The coordination and cooperation of all This section describes the major existing water development projects and proposed water planning water-related government agencies, and development activities in the West Colorado local organizations and individual River Basin. The existing water supplies are vital to water users will be required as the the existence of the local communities while also basin tries to meet its future water providing aesthetic and environmental values.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Showing Location of Selected Surface-Water Sites and Springs, Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah By
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2004–5223 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Location of selected surface-water sites and springs, Escalante River drainage basin—Plate 1 Wilberg, D.E., and Stolp, B.J., 2004, Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 111°45' 111°05' 114 ° 113 ° 112 ° 111° 42 ° T. 30 S. T. 31 S. Great 15 Salt 110 ° 109 ° B 41 ° Lake ou Salt Lake City lde r M Provo ou 40 ° nt ain 39 ° Utah Study 38 ° area Garfield County Kane County 37 ° E a s t F o T. 31 S. r k T. 32 S. 21 East Fork Boulder Creek near Boulder EXPLANATION B o u Boundary of study area l d u e s Platea r Aquariu C r Boundary of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument e e k Road k e e r C C ir Stream c r e le e C D l 16 38°00' if Surface-water site and number k fs or 22 East Fork Deer Creek near Boulder t F 38°00' as Spring E +35 Mile marker—Labeled every 5 miles T. 32 S. T. 33 S. 12 Dixie National Forest s il n a i Tr a t n p u o Boulder rr o T u B M n i f f i D r e e T. 33 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 ON THE COVER Water quality monitoring site ESC02 on the Escalante River in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. Photography by SCPN Water Quality Monitoring for the Escalante River and Coyote Gulch in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area 2014 Summary Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SCPN/NRDS—2017/1134 Melissa Dyer Stephen A. Monroe Stacy E. Stumpf National Park Service Southern Colorado Plateau Network 525 S. Beaver, Building 20 PO Box 5663 Flagstaff, AZ, 86011-5663 December 2017 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conserva- tion and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. Please direct any data requests to the water resources project manager or the SCPN data manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Invertebrates of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Cooperative Agreement Number JSA990024 Annual Report of Activities for 2000
    Aquatic Ecosystems and Invertebrates of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Cooperative Agreement Number JSA990024 Annual Report of Activities for 2000 Mark Vinson National Aquatic Monitoring Center Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Utah State University Logan, Utah 84322-5210 www.usu.edu/buglab 1 April 2001 i Table of contents Page Foreword ........................................................................... i Introduction ........................................................................ 1 Study area ......................................................................... 1 Long-term repeat sampling sites ........................................................ 2 Methods Locations and physical habitat ................................................... 3 Aquatic invertebrates Qualitative samples...................................................... 3 Quantitative samples ..................................................... 4 Laboratory methods ........................................................... 4 Results Sampling locations............................................................ 5 Habitat types................................................................. 6 Water temperatures ........................................................... 8 Aquatic invertebrates .......................................................... 8 Literature cited..................................................................... 13 Appendices 1. Aquatic invertebrates collected in the major habitats A. Alcove pools ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002
    Seepage Investigation and Selected Hydrologic Data for the Escalante River Drainage Basin, Garfield and Kane Counties, Utah, 1909-2002 By Dale E. Wilberg and Bernard J. Stolp U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5233 Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, GRAND STAIRCASE-ESCALANTE NATIONAL MONUMENT Salt Lake City, Utah 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 2329 West Orton Circle Building 810 Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Box 25286, Denver Federal Center http://ut.water.usgs.gov Denver, CO 80225-0286 1-888-ASK-USGS iii CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Physical Setting and Hydrogeology..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Canyon Report
    The Degraded Reach: Rate and Pattern of Bed and Bank Adjustment of the Colorado River in the 25 km Immediately Downstream from Glen Canyon Dam Paul E. Grams1, John C. Schmidt1, David J. Topping2, and Sara Goeking1 1 Department of Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources, Utah State University 2Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey July 2004 in partial fulfillment of cooperative agreement 1425-98-FC-40-22640 and modifications, between Utah State University and the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center CONTENTS CONTENTS........................................................................................................................ 2 ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................... 7 Physiographic Setting ..................................................................................................... 7 Streamflow Regulation ................................................................................................... 9 Sediment Supply ............................................................................................................. 9 Previous Geomorphic Investigations in Glen Canyon.................................................. 11 METHODS ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wild & Scenic Rivers Suitability Study
    Wild and Scenic River Suitability Study for National Forest System Lands in Utah Record of Decision and Forest Plan Amendments The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Wild and Scenic River Suitability Study for National Forest System Lands in Utah Record of Decision and Forest Plan Amendments Counties: Box Elder, Cache, Carbon, Daggett, Duchesne, Emery, Garfield, Grand, Kane, Millard, Piute, Salt Lake, Sanpete, San Juan, Sevier, Summit, Uintah, Utah, Wasatch, Washington, and Weber Counties, Utah; Montrose County, Colorado; and Uinta County, Wyoming Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Cooperating Agencies: State of Utah; Bureau of Land Management (Utah State Office); Sweetwater County Conservation District; Uinta County Conservation District; and Sweetwater and Lincoln County, Wyoming Responsible Officials: KEVIN B. ELLIOTT, FOREST SUPERVISOR Ashley National Forest, 355 North Vernal Avenue, Vernal, Utah 84078 ROBERT G. MACWHORTER, FOREST SUPERVISOR Dixie National Forest, 1789 North Wedgewood Lane, Cedar City, Utah 84720 ALLEN ROWLEY, FOREST SUPERVISOR Fishlake National Forest, 115 East 900 North, Richfield, Utah 84701 PAMELA BROWN, FOREST SUPERVISOR Manti-La Sal National Forest, 599 West Price River Dr., Price, Utah 84501 BRIAN A.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Birds of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, Utah and Arizona
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE BIRDS OF GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA, UTAH AND ARIZONA John. R. Spence1, Charles T. LaRue2, John D. Grahame3 1Resource Management Division, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, PO Box 1507, Page AZ 86040 23515 West Lois Lane, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 3Center for Suistanable Enviroments, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 10 Ocotber 2005 Spence et al. – Annotated Checklist of the Birds of GLCA ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE BIRDS OF GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA This annotated checklist is based on ca. 4,000 bird records maintained in an Access database in the Division of Resource Management, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, as well as numerous studies, most recently an inventory program from 1998-2000 funded by the NPS Inventory & Monitoring Program, WASO. In addition to the many observers that have filled out wildlife observation cards going back to 1962, additional data from the original survey reports was also included (see Historical Review). The checklist follows the American Ornithologist’s Union format, 7th Edition (AOU 1998). Order GAVIIFORMES Family GAVIDAE Pacific Loon (Gavia pacifica). A restricted and sparse winter resident and migrant (always as singles) on Lake Powell and the Colorado River (three records). There are about 20 records from 21 September (1995 in Wahweap Bay-J. Spence) to 18 April (1997 in Wahweap Bay-C. LaRue et al.). Three records from the Colorado River, all at Lee's Ferry on 7 January, 9 March and 16 March 1994, are probably of the same bird (J. Spence, M. Sogge). Another bird was seen there on 12 February 2000 (J.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Canyonlands Research Bibliography Canyonlands Research Center 2002 Environmental Assessment : Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior Canyonlands National Park Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/crc_research Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Recommended Citation National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior and Canyonlands National Park, "Environmental Assessment : Middle Salt Creek Canyon Access Plan Canyonlands National Park, Utah" (2002). Canyonlands Research Bibliography. Paper 226. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/crc_research/226 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Canyonlands Research Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canyonlands Research Bibliography by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MIDDLE SALT CREEK CANYON ACCESS PLAN CANYONLANDS NATIONAL PARK, UTAH _______________________________________________________________________ Summary Salt Creek is the largest drainage in the Needles district of Canyonlands National Park. The creek supports one of the most important riparian ecosystems in the park. It is also the heart of the Salt Creek National Register Archeological District, the area with the highest recorded density of archeological sites in the park. A tributary canyon contains the spectacular Angel Arch, a well-known geologic formation that for many years has been a destination point for park visitors. In 1998 the U.S. District Court for the State of Utah ruled, in a lawsuit filed by the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, that the National Park Service violated the NPS Organic Act (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • HIKING ITINERARY Fill Your Days with Back-Country Hiking Excursions While Staying in Historic Communities, and Enjoying Cultural Experiences
    HIKING ITINERARY Fill your days with back-country hiking excursions while staying in historic communities, and enjoying cultural experiences. With Bryce Canyon County’s diverse landscape and vast number of state and national parks, recreation areas, monuments and more, you will have the opportunity to hike through diverse sceneries. Hiking Itineraries | BryceCanyonCountry.com I-70 SALT LAKE CITY I-70 SALT LAKE CITY 24 INTERSTATE FREEWAY I-70 TORREY 62 Otter Creek MAJOR PAVED ROADS Reservoir SCENIC BYWAYS OTTER CREEK SCENIC BACKWAYS ANTIMONY STATE PARK CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL UNPAVED ROADS 89 PARK 95 STATE PARKS 2O 12 POINTS OF INTEREST 22 ANASAZI STATE I-15 PARK MUSEUM RED CANYON Posey Lake 95 BOULDER Located along Scenic Byway 12—and just 9 miles from Bryce Canyon National Park—Red Canyon will enchant you with its shimmering, PANGUITCH BLANDING ESCALANTE PETRIFIED FOREST STATE PARK CALF red sandstone rocks, which congregatePAROWAN in abundance throughout the CREEK GRAND STAIRCASE- Pine FALLS LAKE RED CANYON ESCALANTE silent oasis of southern Utah. Red Canyon is nested in DixiePANGUITCH National Lake 276 POWELL LAKE NATIONAL Forest’s 2 million acre, 170-mile-long valley range that sweeps along MONUMENT the red rock hoodoos before wandering up to the lush woodlands of 12 ESCALANTE TICABOO the Cedar Mountain forest. HATCH CEDAR 143 BRYCE CEDAR BRYCE TROPIC GLEN CANYON CITY BREAKS CANYON NATIONAL Perhaps the most famous view of Red Canyon can be seen from the NAT’L Tropic NATIONAL DEVIL’S RECREATION AREA MON. Reservoir ROCK ridge teetering off a series of steep switchbacks that accumulate PARK GARDEN HENRIEVILLE on the 7-mile Thunder MountainZION NATIONAL Trail.
    [Show full text]