Advanced OLED microdisplays for near-to-eye applications
Uwe Vogel1*, Bernd Richter1, Philipp Wartenberg1, Peter König1, Olaf Hild1, Karsten Fehse1, Matthias Schober1, Elisabeth Bodenstein2
1 Div. Microdisplays & Sensors 2 Div. Electron Beam * Corresponding author: [email protected]
Fraunhofer Institute for Organic Electronics, Electron Beam and Plasma Technology FEP, Dresden, D-01109, Germany
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Fraunhofer FEP
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Fraunhofer FEP Core Competencies
ELECTRON BEAM PLASMA-ACTIVATED TECHNOLOGY HIGH-RATE DEPOSITION
SPUTTERING HIGH-RATE PECVD TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGIES FOR IC AND ORGANIC ELECTRONICS SYSTEM DESIGN
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Introduction: The case for OLED microdisplays in NTE
OLED-on-Silicon technology Highly efficient light source and imager in one (emissive microdisplay) Low-power High contrast No backlight-related virtual screen for see-through (ST) Smallest system footprint high-resolution & -accuracy patterning Pixel pattern determined by CMOS photolithography OLED pixel density >1,000..5,000..10,000ppi arbitrary emission shapes fast response time (MHz) electronics feature integration driving, control, processing CMOS sensor co-integration and acquisition
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Introduction: Microdisplay challenges in ST-NTE applications
Sun-light conditions high-brightness (>5,000 cd/m²) Lifetime regularly accompanied by elevated temperature operation lowest pixel pitch, directly correlating to die size and cost Limited by voltage drive requirements for high-brightness (OLED LIV) low-power operation for long battery life, affected by OLED efficiency and backplane architecture, extended color gamut, embedded modes for user interaction, e.g., embedded sensors and emission/detection outside the visible.
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] OLED microdisplay challenges
How to address those challenges? OLED micro-patterning Electron-beam direct-writing Embedded sensors, spectral characteristics Bi-directional OLED microdisplay Backplane architecture DRAM vs. SRAM
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] OLED microdisplay challenges
How to address those challenges? OLED micro-patterning Electron-beam direct-writing Embedded sensors, spectral characteristics Bi-directional OLED microdisplay NIR/UV emission Backplane architecture DRAM vs. SRAM
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] State-of-the-art OLED display color-patterning technologies
White OLED with color-filter (CF) EML patterning by shadow masking
encapsulation encapsulation CF Red CF Green CF Blue cathode cathode ETL ETL
W-EML R-EML G-EML B-EML
HTL HTL Anode R Anode G Anode B Anode R Anode G Anode B CMOS Wafer CMOS Wafer
+ Simple process + Wide color gamut + Homogeneous alteration + High contrast Low efficiency Low resolution (<600ppi as of today) Color diffusion Limited scaleability Differential aging All commercial OLED microdisplays as of today
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Comparison of OLED patterning technologies
Approach Resolution Compatibility proven
Fine metal masking 30 µm Small-molecules only Samsung
Vapor Jet 40 µm Small-molecules only UDC
LIFT 3 µm Small-molecules only Samsung / 3M
LITI 40 µm Small-molecules and polymers Samsung / 3M
Imprint Lithography ~10 nm moldable resists, functional organics X resists, low-viscosity inks, functional Capillary molding 50 nm X organics SAM, thin metals, org. & anorg. Soft Printing ~0.1-2 µm X semiconductors Inkjet Printing ~ 10-20 µm Small-molecules and polymers Panasonic Flash-mask transfer ~10 µm Small-molecules only Von Ardenne lithography Photolithography ~1 µm Resists, functional organics Fraunhofer FEP
Electron-beam direct write ~ 1 µm Organics and inorganics Fraunhofer FEP
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] OLED emission modification by electron-beam (EB) direct-write
• Goal: high-res (1..10µm) EB-induced EML/OLED patterning • Achieved so far: Emission of OLED can be individually modified by EB process after encapsulation Electron energy dose • penetrating electrons of EB leads to local reduction in charge carrier injection, which permanently reduces the local emission level • electron dose defines degree of dimming • reduced local emission + conductivity • Electron energy determines their penetration depth into the OLED layer stack 500 µm • Energy can be deposited in layers underneath the encapsulation layers without destroying the encapsulation itself • Individual organic layers can be directly targeted
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Simulation of electron energy absorbed in OLED layer stack
• Estimation of penetration depth and energy absorption of the electrons in the OLED stack by Monte Carlo simulations specific layer properties and scattering processes at interfaces must be taken into account • Majority of the energy is absorbed in the encapsulation layers and only a fraction reaches the delicate organic layers
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] High-resolution patterning by electron-beam direct-write • Lateral control of the electron beam and pixel- by-pixel adjustment of the grey-value enables high- resolution direct-write patterning
• Design example: Picture of Semperoper Dresden • Image size: 1,8 x 1,2 mm2 • Resolution: 2 μm / 12.700 Electron Beam patterning in cooperation with Raith GmbH ppi • Writing time: 105 s
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] High-resolution patterning by electron beam direct-write
• Application examples: • Signage - Micro and miniature displays, large-area • Emissive measuring devices custom-designed lighting components, emissive such as rulers and yardsticks tattoos / eSkin • Data Storage applications • Integrated security features (PUFs – physically unclonable functions) - emissive passport photos
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] OLED microdisplay challenges
How to address those challenges? OLED micro-patterning Electron-beam direct-writing Embedded sensors, spectral characteristics Bi-directional OLED microdisplay Backplane architecture DRAM vs. SRAM
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Bi-directional OLED microdisplay
SVGA
SVGA
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Bi-directional OLED-on-silicon microdisplays 16
no imaging optics so far
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel - Confidential - [email protected] Bi-directional OLED-on-silicon microdisplays 17
Feedback-mode demonstrator no imaging optics so far
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel - Confidential - [email protected] Bi-directional OLED microdisplay
• Adds eye/gaze-controlled (i.e., hands/voice-free) interactivity to smart glasses • Enables vergence monitoring
Line-of-sight
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] 21 Bi-directional OLED microdisplays for eye-controlled interactive smart glasses
Glass@Service: „Interactive personalized visualization in industrial processes as part of Digital Factory in electronics manufacturing“ Funded within „Smart Service World“ of BMWi, started Mar‘16
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] OLED microdisplay challenges
How to address those challenges? OLED micro-patterning Orthogonal photolithography Electron-beam direct-writing Embedded sensors, spectral characteristics Bi-directional OLED microdisplay NIR/UV emission Backplane architecture DRAM vs. SRAM
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Microdisplay Backplane Architecture
For NTE long battery life often more important than frame rate/resolution display simple graphics (e.g., symbols) and text alteration frequency of screen content low (<5Hz) image data stored in a static random access memory SRAM-like pixel cell architecture Direct serial pixel-wise addressing scheme enables much lower bandwidth for display interface strong reduction of display power by minimizing backplane consumption OLED power/efficiency determines overall power consumption now Even VIDEO power advantage for moderate frame rates and resolution
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Microdisplay Power Consumption
Bidirectional OLED microdisplay: - 0,6“ 800 x 600, 16μm pixel pitch - full color @ 200nits - with embedded image sensor
full screen on 200mW
Ultra-low-power microdisplay: - 0.2“ 304 x 256, 12um pixel pitch - monochrome green @ 600nits display power
3mW
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Conclusion & Outlook 27
Challenges for OLED microdisplays in near-to-eye applications Full-color high-brightness, High-temperature, Lifetime, Minimum pixel pitch, Low-power consumption, long battery life, Wide color gamut, User Interaction
Approaches to address OLED micro-patterning Photolithography Lift-off: general yield issues (Dry) Etching: under evaluation Electron-beam direct-writing Fixed images at 2μm shown micro-signage R,G,B-subpattering under evaluation Embedded sensors, extended spectral characteristics Bi-directional OLED microdisplay gaze-interactivity for NTE NIR/UV emission non-VIS NTE; fluorescence sensors, optogenetics Backplane architecture SRAM for low-power NTE
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] SID Mid-Europe Chapter Spring Meeting 2017 28
http://www.fep.fraunhofer.de/sidme17
Program Committee/Key notes: ZEISS Intel Microsoft Microoled Kopin Sony Volkswagen Univ. of Cambridge Univ. of Edinburgh …
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected] Contact 29
Dr. Uwe Vogel Head of Division OLED Microdisplays and Sensors Deputy Director Fraunhofer Institute for Organic Electronics, Electron Beam and Plasma Technology FEP
Maria-Reiche-Strasse 2 D-01109 Dresden phone:+49-351-8823-282 email: [email protected]
Acknowledgements Dr. Alexander Zakhidov, Texas State University
Work was in parts sponsored by European Commission within the HYPOLED project (High-Performance OLED-Microdisplays for Mobile Multimedia HMD and Projection Applications, ICT-2007.3.2-217067) Federal Ministry for Education and Research of the German government (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), BMBF 01 BK 916-919, 16SV2283/"ZOOM", 16SV3682/"ISEMO“, 16SV5036 “NIR-OLED” Sächsische Aufbaubank (SAB) of the State of Saxony (11107/1733 “A18HVMOS” & 100070897 “Cool Projector”) Fraunhofer Internal Programs “iSTAR” Grant No. WISA 817 805, “3D Signage” Grant No. MAVO 823279, “OLITH” Grant No. ATTRACT 162-600032
© Fraunhofer FEP
Dr. Uwe Vogel [email protected]