41-64Pp Review WAJ 28.2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

41-64Pp Review WAJ 28.2 circles. The catalogue thus supports the Professor of Art History and Director show traveled to the Brooklyn Museum, goal of the exhibition and is a major and Chief Curator at the Patricia and New York, April 13–July 22, 2018, and to contribution to its success. • Phillip Frost Art Museum at Florida Pinacoteca de São Paulo, São Paulo: Aug. 18–Nov. 19, 2018. International University in Miami. Carol Damian is an independent 2. A complete list of the artists can be found at https://hammer.ucla.edu/exhibitions/ curator and art writer specializing in the Note 2017/radical-women-latin-american-art- art of Latin America and the Caribbean 1. After opening at the Hammer Museum, 1960-1985/ (accessed July 20, 2018). and women artists. She is the former Los Angeles, Sept. 15 –Dec. 31, 2017, the Radical Eroticism: Women, Schneemann (b. 1939), Anita Art, and Sex in the 1960s Steckel (1930–2012), Marjorie Strider (1931–2014), and By Rachel Middleman Hannah Wilke (1940–93). University of California Press, 2018 Selected in part for their dif- ferent approaches to erotic Reviewed by Erin Devine themes, both materially and conceptually, each artist in he provocative title of Rachel her own way sought to Middleman’s new book unhinge the normative sexu- Tinsinuates a forthright and even ality by which women’s expe- tantalizing discourse on sex and gender. riences as active subjects had Readers will find, however, that the been marginalized. Spurred Fig. 1. Anita Steckel, New York Skyline (ca. 1971, no title’s operative word is radical, as the by what then were recent longer extant), oil on canvas silkscreened with found author sets out to evidence just how foundational texts, such as photo, 6 1/2’ x 8’. © Estate of Anita Steckel. revolutionary it was for women artists Simone de Beauvoir’s The of the 1960s to not only usurp the Second Sex (1949), Helen longstanding representations of woman Gurley Brown’s Sex and the Single Girl otherwise formalist sculpture toward the as sexual object but to lay claim to their (1962), the reports of Alfred Kinsey (1948), erotic, achieved through the sensual own sexuality as well. It is obvious to and later Kate Millet’s watershed Sexual qualities of tactility and evocation rather state that Middleman’s research is Politics (1970), the artists of Middleman’s than the directness of pictorialism.1 With timely in the moment of #MeToo, focus were representative of an emergent Lippard’s help, Middleman rescues although this prescience may be understanding of sex as a legitimate and Wilke’s sculpture from their reduction to burdened by any expectation that the pervasive tool of discrimination at the vaginal portraits, heretofore viewed as a book contributes some strategy toward expansive moment of the feminist and feminine intervention with the era’s gender parity. That would be much to sexual revolutions. By investigating dominant aesthetic. ask of a first major publication, but specifically their works that addressed sex With equal attentiveness, Middleman Middleman’s investigation of sexuality, and sexuality, and the relational power reinvestigates Schneemann’s 1964 Meat and how early feminist artists arrested dynamics enforced thereby, Middleman Joy, arguably one of the most enigmatic its aspect from visual culture, at least positions erotic art as operating within an works of the twentieth century. Precisely buoys the current challenges to important socio-political framework breaking down its elements, she positions patriarchal establishment. rather than the subgenre to which it is the work as a revelatory if not loosely rit- Middleman gives mention to the pri- often diminished. ualistic expression of sexual unrestraint, mary activities and concerns of African- Of Middleman’s survey, Wilke and equally abandoned to by its male and American women artists in this time- Schneemann have already been given female participants. If Meat Joy can be con- frame, aligned much as they were with due attention. However, she offers an sidered a celebratory heralding of 1960s civil rights, and to the contributions of analysis of Wilke’s lesser known sculp- sexual liberation, then Schneemann’s gay male artists to the widespread inter- tures that were produced at the cross- Fuses (1964-67) offered a demystification ference of dominant heteronormativity. roads of Minimalist and proto-Feminist of sex’s import to power. Using the spaces Her project, however, is fixed upon the art, rather than the “performalist” works of her home and personal relationship, interpretations of heterosexuality by for which the artist later became most Fuses was a filmic series that sought to straight women who would become known. Middleman’s understanding of embrace the everyday reality of sexual increasingly involved in the feminist these incongruent, genital forms is intimacy as well as emphasize equity in movement. Her analysis is developed hinged to Lucy Lippard’s 1966 essay romantic partnership. Middleman locates through case studies on the work of five “Eccentric Abstraction,” in which she these works in their time as signals to artists: Martha Edelheit (b. 1931), Carolee outlined a tendency in contemporary and gender equality, both reclaiming the FALL / WINTER 2018 59 power dynamics seen as inherent to het- Women see and know and experi- autobiographical, but always contesting erosexual relationships. ence their bodies and men’s bod- the representations of women as the Contingent with and reminiscent of ies—and there is no shame in this. object-not-subject of sex. The author Meat Joy, Martha Edelheit’s early erotic The only shame is the hypocrisy ... falters to consistently craft her argument paintings appear like a Klimtian which pretends we don’t even for the resistance of these works to panorama of bodies shown from above. know a “dirty joke.” ... We’re the modernist formalism, and much text is The Bacchanalian character of both entire subject matter of all those given to the reprise of seminal critics and Schneemann’s performance and jokes we’re not supposed to know historians of feminist art. Still, the Edelheit’s paintings present a frenzied the meaning of (149).2 resulting effort is foundational to aesthetic, perhaps evocative of a reframing the importance of the erotic burgeoning sexual awakening in which With the publicity surrounding the within the feminist art movement and power differences are suffocated Rockland exhibition, and the subversive the role it plays in gender equality. beneath forms. A visual metaphor for tactics of her photomontage, Steckel’s Kenneth Clark’s The Nude: A Study in new modes of sexual relating, so work was less erotic than political. For Ideal Form, published in 1956, set forth the palpably active are the energies of line instance, a phallus drawn onto a dollar standard concept of the nude as an and color in Edelheit’s compositions bill beneath the words “Legal Gender” expression of universal values. By the that any reference to dominance/ asserts, with Steckel’s trademark wit, end of the 1960s, women artists upended subordinance between male or female that the American economic system is those values and their consigned posi- figures is undetectable. It is important inextricable from male privilege. tions as allegory, muse, and sexual fanta- that Middleman positions this period of These points of labor and economics sy. As Middleman carefully outlines, they Edelheit’s output as an acute perception in relationship to artistic production can- invented new forms by which to reen- of the unfolding “personal and not be underemphasized in Middleman’s gage with the erotic content from which political” events of her time. Like thesis of radical art. At a time when they had been excluded, even daring to painters Joan Semmel and Sylvia Sleigh, women already had fewer opportunities bring into that content the female experi- by the early seventies Edelheit will for exhibition, these women risked fur- ence of the male body. Crossing the clear- focus her work to the male nude, joining ther exclusion by addressing the chal- ly demarcated line of object/subject other feminist artists in the urgent lenging if not forbidden subject of sexual- demanded their own liberty as sexual project of disrupting the male gaze. ity in their work. At the beginning of the beings and thus maneuvered their power This redirection in the output of sixties, eroticism in art featured predomi- to discern some bodies over others, a for- feminist painters is significant to nantly in exhibitions of Pop Art, where merly exclusive site of male privilege. At Middleman’s plotting of the evolution of the dynamics between sexuality and con- this propitious moment in women’s his- the feminist art movement, from the early sumerism could be played out, and very tory where we now find ourselves, sixties through the early seventies. For few women were invited to participate. Middleman’s book reconsiders sex and instance, she notes that submissions of Included in the First International Girlie the erotic if not as part of a revolutionary Edelheit’s early work of male nudes were Exhibition (1964) at Pace Gallery, Marjorie strategy toward gender parity then at rejected while the female nudes were not, Strider was able to break through that least as essential to the struggle. a condition that shifted considerably a restriction, exhibiting her illustrative decade later. And yet Anita Steckel’s often appropriations of the pin-up. Images Erin Devine is an artist, curator, and humorous incorporation of the penis, associated with the objectification of critic based in Washington DC. Her work outlined with oil paint onto huge women in popular culture, and participa- was recently included in the Venice silkscreened canvases of the New York tion in an exhibition that seemed to glori- International Performance Art Week, and City skyline (ca. 1971; Fig 1), was not too fy them, would be problematic to femi- a new work, Contrab®and, has been funny to local politicians or the trustees of nist artists a decade later if not for commissioned for the Torpedo Factory Rockland Community College in Suffern, Strider’s treatment of the subject.
Recommended publications
  • Double Vision: Woman As Image and Imagemaker
    double vision WOMAN AS IMAGE AND IMAGEMAKER Everywhere in the modern world there is neglect, the need to be recognized, which is not satisfied. Art is a way of recognizing oneself, which is why it will always be modern. -------------- Louise Bourgeois HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES The Davis Gallery at Houghton House Sarai Sherman (American, 1922-) Pas de Deux Electrique, 1950-55 Oil on canvas Double Vision: Women’s Studies directly through the classes of its Woman as Image and Imagemaker art history faculty members. In honor of the fortieth anniversary of Women’s The Collection of Hobart and William Smith Colleges Studies at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, contains many works by women artists, only a few this exhibition shows a selection of artworks by of which are included in this exhibition. The earliest women depicting women from The Collections of the work in our collection by a woman is an 1896 Colleges. The selection of works played off the title etching, You Bleed from Many Wounds, O People, Double Vision: the vision of the women artists and the by Käthe Kollwitz (a gift of Elena Ciletti, Professor of vision of the women they depicted. This conjunction Art History). The latest work in the collection as of this of women artists and depicted women continues date is a 2012 woodcut, Glacial Moment, by Karen through the subtitle: woman as image (woman Kunc (a presentation of the Rochester Print Club). depicted as subject) and woman as imagemaker And we must also remember that often “anonymous (woman as artist). Ranging from a work by Mary was a woman.” Cassatt from the early twentieth century to one by Kara Walker from the early twenty-first century, we I want to take this opportunity to dedicate this see depictions of mothers and children, mythological exhibition and its catalog to the many women and figures, political criticism, abstract figures, and men who have fostered art and feminism for over portraits, ranging in styles from Impressionism to forty years at Hobart and William Smith Colleges New Realism and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • John Boyle, Greg Curnoe and Joyce Wieland: Erotic Art and English Canadian Nationalism
    John Boyle, Greg Curnoe and Joyce Wieland: Erotic Art and English Canadian Nationalism by Matthew Purvis A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cultural Mediations Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2020, Matthew Purvis i Abstract This dissertation concerns the relation between eroticism and nationalism in the work of a set of English Canadian artists in the mid-1960s-70s, namely John Boyle, Greg Curnoe, and Joyce Wieland. It contends that within their bodies of work there are ways of imagining nationalism and eroticism that are often formally or conceptually interrelated, either by strategy or figuration, and at times indistinguishable. This was evident in the content of their work, in the models that they established for interpreting it and present in more and less overt forms in some of the ways of imagining an English Canadian nationalism that surrounded them. The dissertation contextualizes the three artists in the terms of erotic art prevalent in the twentieth century and makes a case for them as part of a uniquely Canadian mode of decadence. Constructing my case largely from the published and unpublished writing of the three subjects and how these played against their reception, I have attempted to elaborate their artistic models and processes, as well as their understandings of eroticism and nationalism, situating them within the discourses on English Canadian nationalism and its potentially morbid prospects. Rather than treating this as a primarily cultural or socio-political issue, it is treated as both an epistemic and formal one.
    [Show full text]
  • Available in 12 Styles Licenses for Web, Desktop, & App Designed By
    Garnett Designed by Available in 12 styles Connor Davenport in 2018 Licenses for Web, Desktop, & App 1 All Caps Roman POWERS Black — 70pt BURMAN Bold — 70pt KNIGHTS Semibold — 70pt BERKSOY Medium — 70pt CHRYSSA Regular — 70pt VELASCO Light — 70pt Garnett 2 All Caps Italic MÜNTER Black Italic — 70pt PARRISH Bold Italic — 70pt REYNELL Semibold Italic — 70pt STECKEL Medium Italic — 70pt ANSINGH Regular Italic — 70pt KAY SAGE Light Italic — 70pt Garnett 3 Title Case Roman Spanton Black — 70pt Léontine Bold — 70pt Bagshaw Semibold — 70pt Kostenko Medium — 70pt Schwartz Regular — 70pt Nimarkoh Light — 70pt Garnett 4 Title Case Italic Winegar Black Italic — 70pt Blumann Bold Italic — 70pt Käsebier Semibold Italic — 70pt Mendieta Medium Italic — 70pt Chalmers Regular Italic — 70pt Suruzhon Light Italic — 70pt Garnett 5 All Caps & Title Case Roman MOTHER AND CHILD Sanja Iveković Black — 30pt BRAZILIAN ORCHIDS Henriette Wyeth Bold — 30pt I DON’T KNOW WHAT Mary Tillman Smith Semibold — 30pt STATUE DE CAVALIER Émilie Charmy Medium — 30pt IN THE BOX, VERTICAL Ruth Bernhard Regular — 30pt BLUE ATMOSPHERE III Helen Frankenthaler Light — 30pt Garnett 6 All Caps & Title Case Italic FREEING THE VOICE Marina Abramović Black — 30pt JEAN-PAUL SARTRE Gisèle Freund Bold — 30pt MUSIQUE ADORABLE Valentine Hugo Semibold — 30pt THE CRY OF ORESTES Françoise Gilot Medium — 30pt THE NIGHT SWIMMER Brita Granström Regular — 30pt EAST TENTH STREET Anne Goldthwaite Light — 30pt Garnett 7 Text Sizes, Mixed Weights 18pt / 23 ‒ Mixed Weights In 1905, Georgia O’Keeffebegan her serious formal art training at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago and then the Art Students League of New York, but she felt constrained by her lessons that focused on recreating or copying what was in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Judith Bernstein Selected Press Pa Ul Kasmin Gallery
    JUDITH BERNSTEIN SELECTED PRESS PA UL KASMIN GALLERY Judith Bernstein Shines a Blacklight on Trump’s Crimes We cannot ignore the fact that Americans voted for Trump. Jillian McManemin Feburary 16, 2018 Judith Bernstein, “President” (2017), acrylic and oil on canvas, 90 x 89 1/2 inches (all images courtesy the artist and Paul Kasmin Gallery) People pay to watch a real fuck. In the heyday of Times Square porn the “money shot” was developed to prove that the sex-on-film was real and not simulated. The proof? Cum. The (male) ejaculation onto the body of his co-star. In her debut solo show at Paul Kasmin Gallery, Judith Bernstein unveils Money Shot, a series of large- scale paintings starring the Trump administration, its horrific present and terrifying potential future. The gallery is outfitted with blacklight, which alters the paintings even during daytime hours. The works glow orange, green, violet, and acid yellow against pitch black. The unstable colors signal that nothing will ever look or be the same as it was before. But, this isn’t the dark of night. This place is tinged with psychedelia. The distortions border on 293 & 297 TENTH AVENUE 515 WEST 27TH STREET TELEPHONE 212 563 4474 NEW YORK, NY 10001 PAULKASMINGALLERY.COM PA UL KASMIN GALLERY nauseating. The room spins as we stand still. We oscillate between terror and gut-busting laughter, as we witness what we once deemed unimaginable. Judith Bernstein, “Money Shot – Blue Balls” (2017), acrylic and oil on canvas, 104 x 90 1/2 inches Our eyes adjust at different speeds to the dark.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 JUDITH BERNSTEIN Interviewed by Jonathan Thomas
    JUDITH BERNSTEIN interviewed by Jonathan Thomas Judith Bernstein, Rising, installation view: Studio Voltaire, 2014 Jonathan Thomas: It’s snowing—and of women. I was very much aware of the fact there’s a parade outside. that there were only three women in my class Judith Bernstein: Yes, it’s a good omen; and that the rest were men. The instructors we’ve started on the Chinese New Year! were all men, except for Helen Frankenthaler, Thomas: Okay, this sounds a bit crazy. who was a visiting instructor and only taught a Bernstein: I see, there’s a disclaimer single course. At the orientation address, Jack already. What’s going on here? Tworkov, who was Chair of the School of Art, Thomas: I was going to say that for its said We cannot place women. What he meant to first 268 years, Yale University only accepted say was, If you’re a woman, you’re on your own students if they were men. after you graduate. We can’t help you get a job Bernstein: That’s correct. in an academic setting. That was day one, but Thomas: So when you were there as a it just went in one ear and out the other. Times graduate student from 1964 to 1967, women have changed. Now there are more women at were not permitted to attend as undergradu- Yale than men. ates, only men. That changed in 1969, but I’m Thomas: And the cost of getting an MFA wondering what it was like for you as a student has changed too.
    [Show full text]
  • Artforum Fusco January 30, 2007
    http://www.artforum.com/diary/1 01.30.07 Gender Bender New York · Rhonda Lieberman on feminism at MoMA · Andrew Berardini around Los Angeles · William Pym on Philadelphia's biggest-ever art party Left: Coco Fusco and the Guerrilla Girls. (Photo: Brian Sholis) Right: Curator Catherine · David Velasco on de Zegher and artist Martha Rosler. (Photo: David Velasco) Terence Koh at the Whitney On Friday, I attended the first half of a two-day symposium at MoMA · Lillian Davies on on “The Feminist Future: Theory and Practice in the Visual Arts.” The Tim Gardner at the sold-out Roy and Niuta Titus Theater was packed with vintage women National Gallery artists, as well as chroniclers, comrades, and frenemies, whether they · Zach Baron at identified with the “f-word” or not. Thankfully, not much time was concerts by Patti wasted quibbling over that, as is customary in such situations, though Smith and Text of Light one questioner did complain about the “c-word,” which she found as deeply offensive as the “n-word.” The lady next to me wondered, “What’s the N-word?” Oy. I helpfully wrote it on her program. She later January 2007 crossed it out. December 2006 The day started with palpable excitement. It seemed a roomful of November 2006 underacknowledged women artists were about to taste vindication at October 2006 MoMA, the stern, withholding mothership. The venerable Lucy Lippard September 2006 kicked things off with a minihistory of our struggles, contrasting early feminist ideals of community and revolution with the more cynical August 2006 early-twenty-first-century careerism.
    [Show full text]
  • OTIS Ben Maltz Gallery WB Exhibition Checklist 1 | Page of 58 (2012 Jan 23)
    OTIS Ben Maltz Gallery WB Exhibition Checklist 1 | Page of 58 (2012_Jan_23) GUIDE TO THE EXHIBITION Doin’ It in Public: Feminism and Art at the Woman’s Building October 1, 2011–January 28, 2012 Ben Maltz Gallery, Otis College of Art and Design Introduction “Doin’ It in Public” documents a radical and fruitful period of art made by women at the Woman’s Building—a place described by Sondra Hale as “the first independent feminist cultural institution in the world.” The exhibition, two‐volume publication, website, video herstories, timeline, bibliography, performances, and educational programming offer accounts of the collaborations, performances, and courses conceived and conducted at the Woman’s Building (WB) and reflect on the nonprofit organization’s significant impact on the development of art and literature in Los Angeles between 1973 and 1991. The WB was founded in downtown Los Angeles in fall 1973 by artist Judy Chicago, art historian Arlene Raven, and designer Sheila Levrant de Bretteville as a public center for women’s culture with art galleries, classrooms, workshops, performance spaces, bookstore, travel agency, and café. At the time, it was described in promotional materials as “a special place where women can learn, work, explore, develop their own point of view and share it with everyone. Women of every age, race, economic group, lifestyle and sexuality are welcome. Women are invited to express themselves freely both verbally and visually to other women and the whole community.” When we first conceived of “Doin’ It in Public,” we wanted to incorporate the principles of feminist art education into our process.
    [Show full text]
  • Woman's Art Journal, Pp. 1-6.Pdf
    Woman's Art Inc. Sexual Imagery in Women's Art Author(s): Joan Semmel and April Kingsley Source: Woman's Art Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Spring - Summer, 1980), pp. 1-6 Published by: Woman's Art Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1358010 . Accessed: 31/10/2013 13:21 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Woman's Art Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Woman's Art Journal. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 131.128.70.20 on Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:21:39 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Sexual Imagery In Women's Art JOAN SEMMEL APRIL KINGSLEY Women's sexual art tends to stress either strong posi- skillfully referring us back to other contexts. This re- tive or strong negative aspects of their experiences. ferral to a realm of experience thought to be antithetical Feelings of victimization and anger, while sometimes to "sacred" art is characteristic of Pop art in general. expressed as masochistic fantasy, often become politically However, in the case of erotic imagery the evocation of directed, especially in contemporary works.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue (PDF)
    Vol. 1 No. 3 r r l S J L f J C L f f C t J I Winter/Spring 1977 AT LONG LAST —An historical view of art made by women by Miriam Schapiro page 4 DIALOGUES WITH NANCY SPERO by Carol De Pasquale page 8 THE SISTER CHAPEL —A traveling homage to heroines by Gloria Feman Orenstein page 12 'Women Artists: 1550— 1950’ ARTEMISIA GENTILESCHI — Her life in art, part II by Barbara Cavaliere page 22 THE WOMEN ARTISTS’ MOVEMENT —An Assessment Interviews with June Blum, Mary Ann Gillies, Lucy Lippard, Pat Mainardi, Linda Nochlin, Ce Roser, Miriam Schapiro, Jackie Skiles, Nancy Spero, and Michelle Stuart page 26 THE VIEW FROM SONOMA by Lawrence Alloway page 40 The Sister Chapel GALLERY REVIEWS page 41 REPORTS ‘Realists Choose Realists’ and the Douglass College Library Program page 51 WOMANART MAGAZINE is published quarterly by Womanart Enterprises, 161 Prospect Park West, Brooklyn, New York 11215. Editorial submissions and all inquiries should be sent to: P. O. Box 3358, Grand Central Station, New York, N.Y. 10017. Subscription rate: $5.00 for one year. All opinions expressed are those o f the authors, and do not necessarily reflect those o f the editors. This publication is on file with the International Women’s History Archive, Special Collections Library, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60201. Permission to reprint must be secured in writing from the publishers. Copyright © Artemisia Gentileschi- Fame' Womanart Enterprises, 1977. A ll rights reserved. AT LONG LAST AN HISTORICAL VIEW OF ART MADE BY WOMEN by Miriam Schapiro Giovanna Garzoni, Still Life with Birds and Fruit, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits” Proof
    Vol. 2 No. 1 wdmaqartrrVlliftAIIUA l Fall 1977 OUT OF THE MAINSTREAM Two artists' attitudes about survival outside of New York City by Janet Heit page 4 19th CENTURY AMERICAN PRINTMAKERS A neglected group of women is revealed to have filled roles from colorist to Currier & Ives mainstay by Ann-Sargent Wooster page 6 INTERVIEW WITH BETTY PARSONS The septuagenarian artist and dealer speaks frankly about her relationship to the art world, its women, and the abstract expressionists by Helene Aylon .............................................................................. pag e 10 19th c. Printmakers MARIA VAN OOSTERWUCK This 17th century Dutch flower painter was commissioned and revered by the courts of Europe, but has since been forgotten by Rosa Lindenburg ........................................................................pag e ^ 6 STRANGERS WHEN WE MEET A 'how-to' portrait book reveals societal attitudes toward women by Lawrence A llo w a y ..................................................................... pag e 21 GALLERY REVIEWS ............................................................................page 22 EVA HESSE Combined review of Lucy Lippard's book and a recent retrospective exhibition by Jill Dunbar ...................................................................................p a g e 33 REPORTS Artists Support Women's Rights Day Activities, Bridgeport Artists' Studio—The Factory ........................................ p a g e 34 Betty Parsons W OMAN* ART*WORLD News items of interest page 35 Cover: Betty Parsons. Photo by Alexander Liberman. WOMANARTMAGAZINE is published quarterly by Womanart Enterprises. 161 Prospect.Park West, Brooklyn. New York 11215. Editorial submissions and all inquiries should be sent to: P.O. Box 3358, Grand Central Station. New York. N.Y. 10017. Subscription rate: $5.00 fo r one year. Application to mail at second class postage rates pending in Brooklyn. N. Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean-Noel Archive.Qxp.Qxp
    THE JEAN-NOËL HERLIN ARCHIVE PROJECT Jean-Noël Herlin New York City 2005 Table of Contents Introduction i Individual artists and performers, collaborators, and groups 1 Individual artists and performers, collaborators, and groups. Selections A-D 77 Group events and clippings by title 109 Group events without title / Organizations 129 Periodicals 149 Introduction In the context of my activity as an antiquarian bookseller I began in 1973 to acquire exhibition invitations/announcements and poster/mailers on painting, sculpture, drawing and prints, performance, and video. I was motivated by the quasi-neglect in which these ephemeral primary sources in art history were held by American commercial channels, and the project to create a database towards the bibliographic recording of largely ignored material. Documentary value and thinness were my only criteria of inclusion. Sources of material were random. Material was acquired as funds could be diverted from my bookshop. With the rapid increase in number and diversity of sources, my initial concept evolved from a documentary to a study archive project on international visual and performing arts, reflecting the appearance of new media and art making/producing practices, globalization, the blurring of lines between high and low, and the challenges to originality and quality as authoritative criteria of classification and appreciation. In addition to painting, sculpture, drawing and prints, performance and video, the Jean-Noël Herlin Archive Project includes material on architecture, design, caricature, comics, animation, mail art, music, dance, theater, photography, film, textiles and the arts of fire. It also contains material on galleries, collectors, museums, foundations, alternative spaces, and clubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Judith Bernstein Conversations Conversations
    CONVERSATIONS JUDITH BERNSTEIN CONVERSATIONS CONVERSATIONS Conversations is an ongoing production from Venus Over Manhattan, where artists, writers, critics, academics, and familiars come together to talk about art. Each conversation is published as an audio recording made accessible the gallery’s website, and accompanied by a PDF that features a transcript of the conversation. Listen along at #ConversationsVOM. On April 23rd, 2020, Judith Bernstein and Alison Gingeras spoke with Anna Furney about Bernstein’s career. They discuss her time at Yale in the 1960s, her first solo-exhibition at A.I.R. Gallery, and what it means to be a Feminist artist. Judith Bernstein is an artist living and work in New York City. She joins the conversation from her loft on the Lower East Side, where she’s lived for more than 50 years. Alison Gingeras is a curator and writer. She has held positions at numerous institutions including the Guggenheim Museum, the Musée national d’art moderne, Centre Pompidou and the Palazzo Grassi. She joins the conversation from her home in Brooklyn. Anna Christina Furney is partner at Venus Over Manhattan. She moderated this conversation 2. 3. CONVERSATIONS CONVERSATIONS ACF: Hi everybody. I wanted to introduced Judith accepted canon of a lot of the women artists Bernstein and Alison Gingeras, two very dear that were celebrated, and sort of the mainstream parts of the VOM family. Judith Bernstein is of cornerstones of this period of time. I hesitate course the legendary artist living and working to call it a movement, because Judith is among here in New York City, and Alison is a world- the artists who, in my opinion, is part, and was famous curator and art-historian of all things, and part of this sort of radical fringe that questioned in particular, has had a longstanding relationship from the very beginning what feminist art should with Judith and her work, and a lot of the subject look like, and what it should be about.
    [Show full text]