Water Resources of the Hartford-New Britain Area, Connecticut

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Resources of the Hartford-New Britain Area, Connecticut Water Resources of the Hartford-New Britain Area, Connecticut By R. V. CUSHMAN, D. TANSKI, and M. P. THOMAS WATER RESOURCES OF INDUSTRIAL AREAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1499-H UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.G. 20492 CONTENTS Pago Abstract . _______._____._______________ Hi Introduction ___________________________________________ 2 Description of the area________________________________________ 3 Importance of the area_______________________________________ 5 Sources and significance of water_______-_-_-_____-_____-_-_-_---___- 5 Significance of water quality------------------------------------ 6 Pollution__________________________________. 9 Water resources of the area. _______________________ _ ______ _ ____ 12 Records available________________ _ _______________ _ ________ 12 Connecticut River_____________________________________________ 16 Scantic River___-__-___________-____--_-_-_______-_____-__-__- 23 Farmington River__________________.______-________-_-_-____-- 33 Burlington Brook .._______ ____________________________________ 41 Park River________________________________ 43 Hockanum River____________________________________________ 52 Ground water in sand-and^ravel aquifers__-___________--_------- 59 Fluvial sand of the Connecticut River lowland ________________ 59 Delta of glacial Farmington River_________________________ 61 Glaciofluvial deposits of Connecticut River lowland-_-___-__--_ 62 Glaciofluvial deposits in South Branch Park River basin _-___- 63 Buried deposits in bedrock channels_______________________ 64 Chemical quality-___________________ ____-_______---_---- 65 Ground water in sedimentary bedrock________________--__-_--- 66 Yield of wells_______.____________--___-----_-.__-_------ 67 Chemical quality___________________________-__-_-__---_-_- 69 Other sources of small ground-water supplies.______________---_--- 71 Crystalline bedrock_____________________________________-__ 71 Glacial till..___________________.__________ 74 Chemical quality._________________________________------ 74 Public water supplies__________________________________-------_ 75 Use of water____________________________________________________ 78 Emergency water supplies______________________-___--_-____---- -. 83 Possibility of further development--------------------_--------__--- 85 Selected references----.___________________----______ ___ 93 Index.___________________________________________________________ 95 m rv CONTENTS ILLUSTKATIONS [All plates are In pocket] PLATE 1-2. Maps of Hartford-New Britain area showing: 1. Areas inundated by the flood of March 20, 1936, on the Connecticut River. 2. Areal distribution of water-bearing deposits, bed­ rock surface, locations of wells, and geologic sections. Page FIGURE 1. Map showing area included in the Hartford-New Britain area.. __ _____ __ .___ H4 2. Graph showing duration of records at gaging stations__ 13 3-4. Duration curves, Connecticut River: 3. Daily flow___________. ___ _ ___ 18 4. Weeklyflow_______________________ 19 6-7. Graphs showing: 5. Magnitude and frequency of annual low flovs, Con­ necticut River____________-_--_------------_ 20 6. Maximum period of deficient discharge, Connecticut River__________________________ 20 7. Magnitude and frequency of floods, Connecticut River.._....____..._..___._._-.--._...... 21 8. Profiles of floods of 1936, 1938, and 1955, Connecticut River___._________.____...____ 22 9-11. Graphs showing: 9. Daily concentration of iron and hardness as CaCOs, Connecticut River___________________________ 24 10. Relation of dissolved solids to discharge, Con­ necticut River__________________________ 25 11. Temperature of Connecticut River ______________ 25 12. Cumulative frequency curve of temperature, Connecticut River_____________________________ 26 13. Duration curve of daily flow, Scantic River.___________ 27 14-19. Graphs showing: 14. Magnitude and frequency of annual lov flows, Scantic River__________________.____________ 27 15. Maximum period of deficient discharge, Scantic River___________________________ 28 16. Storage required to maintain flows,"Scantic River. 28 17. Magnitude and frequency of floods, Scantic River. 29 18. Relation of suspended-sediment load to discharge, Scantic River______________________---______ 32 19. Monthly sediment load, Scantic River.__________ 33 20. Duration curve of daily flow, Farmington River. _______ 35 21-24. Graphs showing: 21. Magnitude and frequency of annual IOT' flows, Farmington River___________________________ 36 22. Maximum period of deficient discharge, Farmington River_______________._________ 36 23. Storage required to maintain flows, Farmington River__________________________ 37 24. Magnitude and frequency of floods, Farmington River________________________ 38 CONTENTS V FIGURE 25. Graph showing specific conductance,daily mean discharge, Page and daily concentration of iron, Parmington River.___ H39 26. Cumulative frequency curve of temperatures, Parmington River_____________________________ 40 27. Duration curve of daily flow, Burlington Brook __ _____ 42 28-31. Graphs showing: 28. Magnitude and frequency of annual low flows, Burlington Brook--------_--____________ 43 29. Maximum period of deficient discharge, Burlington Brook._________________________ 43 30. Storage required to maintain flows, Burlington Brook_______________________._ 44 31. Magnitude and frequency of floods, Burlington Brook__________________________ 44 32. Duration curve of daily flow, Park River__. ______-- 45 33-35. Graphs showing: 33. Magnitude and frequency of annual low flows, Park River.______________________ 46 34. Maximum period of deficient discharge, Park River________________________ 46 35. Storage required to maintain flows, Park RSver__ 47 36. Duration curve of daily flow, North Branch Park River. 48 37-39. Graphs showing: 37. Magnitude and frequency of annual low flows, North Branch Park River____________- 49 38. Maximum period of deficient discharge, North Branch Park River__________________---_---_ 50 39. Storage required to maintain flows, North Brapch Park River____________________ 51 40. Duration curve of daily flow, South Branch Park River. _ 52 41-43. Graphs showing: 41. Magnitude and frequency of annual low flows, South Branch Park River..________- 53 42. Maximum period of deficient discharge, South Branch Park River_________________- 53 43. Storage required to maintain flows, South Branch Park River___________________ 54 44-46. Graphs showing magnitude and frequency of floods: 44. Park River____________.____..__... 54 45. North Branch Park River____.___________------ 55 46. South Branch Park River..._________...- 55 47. Duration curve of daily flow, Hockanum River._.-___.- 56 48-51. Graphs showing: 48. Magnitude and frequency of annual low flows, Hockanum River_______________ ._.-_ 57 49. Maximum period of deficient discharge, Hockanum River________________________ 57 50. Storage required to maintain flows, Honkanum River__ r ______________________ 58 51. Magnitude and frequency of floods, Hookanum River__________________________ 58 52. Cumulative frequency curves of yield of wells in sedi­ mentary bedrock.__.____________.___.___-- 68 VI CONTENTS Page FIGURE 53. Flow chart of water-supply system of Metropolitan District...__________________________ H76 54. Graph showing use distribution in percent of total use of water of the Metropolitan District for 1957._________ 77 55. Flow chart of water-supply system, New Britain._______ 78 56-57. Graphs showing: 56. Use of water in the Hartford-New Britair area, 1957.._________________._.____ 80 57. Average annual use and per capita use of water supplied by the Metropolitan District, 1947-57. 82 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Suggested water-quality tolerances.___-___-_-_--___-__ H7 2. Suggested water-quality tolerance for boiler-feed vater. _ 8 3. Classification of surface waters according to suitability of use.__________________________________________ 10 4. Summary of streamflow data, Hartford-New Britain area..___________________________________________ 14 5. Usable storage in Connecticut River basin above Middle- town____________________________________________ 16 6. Summary of chemical analyses, Connecticut River at Thompsonville, October 1955 to September 19">6____ 23 7. Chemical analyses of periodic water samples, Scantic River at Broad Brook___________ _____ 30 8. Duration table of daily sediment load, Scantic River at Broad Brook, 1953-58_________________ 31 9. Summary of chemical analyses, Farmington River at Rainbow, October 1957 to September 1958______ 38 10. Chemical analyses of periodic water samples, Park River at Hartford, Hockanum River at Shenipsit Lake, and Hockanum River near East Hartford.___________ 51 11. Partial chemical analyses by the Connecticut State Department of Health of water from wells in the Hart­ ford-New Britain area and vicinity._________________ 70 12. Chemical analyses of water from wells in the Hartford- New Britain area and vicinity_______________.____ 72 13. Public water supplies in the Hartford-New Britain area for the year ending December 31, 1957._____________ 79 14. Analysis of finished water, Water Bureau of the Metro­ politan District.__________________________________ 80 15. Analysis of finished water, New Britain Water E apart­ ment _ ___________________________________________ 80
Recommended publications
  • Connecticut River Watershed
    34-AC-2 CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED 2003 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS IAN BOWLES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAURIE BURT, COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: • On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); • Microfilmed retained at the State Library; • Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; • Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; • Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; • Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; • Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Winchendon can apply at their local library for loan of any MassDEP/DWM report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Watershed Modifications
    5 Watershed Modifications 5.1 Dams and Impoundments The North Branch Park River watershed includes a number of dams and reservoirs that were constructed for flood control, water supply, industrial power, and recreation. Some of the existing dams and reservoirs retain their original uses, while others now primarily provide recreation, habitat, and open space. The major flood control reservoirs in the watershed, several of which only impound water during large storms, are largely undeveloped and therefore provide valuable wildlife habitat and open space. Other impoundments in the watershed provide aquatic and wildlife habitat and recreational opportunities, but may also limit or impede fish migration. Table 5-1 lists the flood control reservoirs in the watershed, while Table 5-2 lists state-registered dams in the watershed. Figure 5-1 depicts the Monument at Blue Hills Reservoir (NEE, 2009). locations of the various dams and impoundments in the watershed. Table 5-1. Flood Control Reservoirs in the North Branch Park River Watershed Flood CTDEP Drainage Pool Control Name/ Flood Area Surface Location Pool Year Completed Control ID (square Area Volume No. miles) (acres) (acre-feet) Wintonbury Westerly branch of Reservoir/ Beamans Brook, 1.2 1 1.42 850 165 1963 miles northeast of *dam only Bloomfield Town Hall Easterly branch of Blue Hills Beamans Brook, 1.3 Reservoir/1964 2 1.9 700 175 miles northeast of *dam only Bloomfield Town Hall Wash Brook, 1.5 miles Bloomfield (Tunxis) north of Bloomfield Reservoir/1962 3 Town Hall, adjacent to 3.05
    [Show full text]
  • MMI 53 River Street Dam.Pdf
    TOWN OF ACTON JUNE 7, 2019 | ACTON, MA PROPOSAL Studies Related to the Dam Located at 53 River Street June 7, 2019 Mr. John Mangiaratti, Town Manager Town of Acton Town Manager’s Office 472 Main Street Acton, MA 01720 RE: River Street Dam Removal and Fort Pond Brook Restoration Acton, Massachusetts MMI #4458-02 Dear Mr. Mangiaratti: The Milone & MacBroom team of structural engineers, bridge scour experts, geotechnical engineers, and hydraulic engineers are uniquely qualified to design the dam removal, and evaluate the potential upstream and downstream infrastructure impacts associated with the removal of the Dam at River Street to improve ecological functions of the Fort Pond Brook. When reviewing our proposal, we ask that you consider the following: Our team brings expertise and a proven track record of success in dam removal projects throughout New England. Milone & MacBroom professionals have backgrounds in hydrology and hydraulics, engineering design, fisheries expertise, and wetland biology. Our staff also includes invasive species experts, fisheries biologists, and permitting specialists. We also integrate the creative innovation of our extensive in-house team of landscape architects and frequently include passive recreational park features at our dam removal sites. We have the ability to integrate dam removal with the natural site opportunities through careful analysis and planning so that your project is technically sound, environmentally sensitive, and aesthetically pleasing. Our team of experts has performed many dam removal projects throughout New England and the Northeast. Milone and MacBroom are pioneers in the field, having completed our first dam removals in the 1990s. With over 40 constructed dam removal projects, we have completed more than any other design firm in the Northeast.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Cycle 3 Grant Recipients
    2019 Cycle 3 Grant Recipients Name City State Read to Grow Branford CT Caroline House, Inc. Bridgeport CT Connecticut Zoological Society Bridgeport CT GBAPP, Inc. Bridgeport CT Habitat for Humantity of Coastal Fairfield County Bridgeport CT Hall Neighborhood House Bridgeport CT Housatonic Community College Foundation, Inc. Bridgeport CT Norma F. Pfriem Urban Outreach Initiatives, Inc. Bridgeport CT Supportive Housing Works Inc. Bridgeport CT Boys & Girls Club of Bristol Family Center Bristol CT Regional YMCA of Western CT Brookfield CT Kids in Crisis, Inc. Cos Cob CT Adelbrook Cromwell CT Shelter of the Cross, Inc. Danbury CT Shepherds Darien CT The Tiny Miracles Foundation (TTMF) Darien CT Futures-Ct Inc dba Woofgang & Co. Fairfield CT Horizons at Sacred Heart University Fairfield CT Wakeman Boys & Girls Club Fairfield CT Billings Forge Community Works Hartford CT Boys & Girls Clubs of Hartford, Inc. Hartford CT Capital Workforce Partners Hartford CT Oak Hill Hartford CT Connecticut Public Broadcasting, Inc. Hartford CT Corporation for Supportive Housing Hartford CT Covenant Preparatory School Hartford CT Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc. Hartford CT Hartford Promise Hartford CT International Hartford Ltd. Hartford CT Literacy Volunteers Of Greater Hartford Hartford CT Northside Institutions Neighborhood Alliance Hartford CT Partnership for Strong Communities Hartford CT Rebuilding Together Hartford Hartford CT South Park Inn Inc Hartford CT The Boys and Girls Club of Meriden, Inc. Meriden CT Human Resources Agency Of New Britain Inc New Britain CT Central Connecticut Coast YMCA New Haven CT Community Soup Kitchen New Haven CT FISH of Greater New Haven New Haven CT Habitat for Humanity of Greater New Haven New Haven CT Leadership, Education and Athletics in Partnership, New Haven CT Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Report: 5/06/02, Number 3
    FISHING REPORT NUMBER 20 9/1/2010 INLAND REPORT LARGEMOUTH BASS fishing was generally fair to good, with reports from Billings Lake, Candlewood Lake, East Twin Lake, Gardner Lake, Glasgo Pond, Mudge Pond (a 5 lb bass among the catches), Pattagansett Lake, Pickerel Lake (catches include a 6 lb bass), Lake Zoar (a tough place for some anglers, but fair action can be found, and recent catches do include a 5 lb largemouth), Bantam Lake, the Farmington River (Simsbury area), Moosup Pond, Roseland Lake, Park Pond, Black Pond (Woodstock) and Shenipsit Lake. Other areas reporting some bass action include Bishop Swamp, Silver Lake (Berlin), Burr Pond and West Hill Pond. SMALLMOUTH BASS action reported from Candlewood Lake (very good), Housatonic River (excellent), Rainbow Reservoir (good action in places, another drawdown begins next week), Lake Zoar (slow to fair), Lake McDonough (slow, and remember- the boat launch closes Labor Day), Coventry Lake (some being caught), Willimantic River, Colebrook Reservoir (some action), highland Lake (fair- to slow) and West Hill Pond (fair). NORTHERN PIKE catches have been reported from Bantam Lake, Mansfield Hollow Reservoir and Pachaug Pond. Few reports for WALLEYE this week, some action reported from Beach Pond. SUNFISH continue to provide excellent late summer action. Worms, grubs, jigs or small poppers all work. Small local ponds are often great places for sunnies, bigger places to try include Lower Moodus Reservoir (drawdown begins next week), Twin Brooks Park Pond, Batterson Park Pond, Red Cedar Lake, Bishop Pond, Dog Pond, Hatch Pond, Leonard Pond, Gardner Lake, Coventry Lake and Tyler Lake. CONNECTICUT RIVER – CATFISH (including some 10 lb plus cats) are providing some great late summer action on cut bait (chunking) in brush piles near deeper holes.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshirestate Parks M New Hampshire State Parks M
    New Hampshire State Parks Map Parks State State Parks State Magic of NH Experience theExperience nhstateparks.org nhstateparks.org Experience theExperience Magic of NH State Parks State State Parks Map Parks State New Hampshire nhstateparks.org A Mountain Great North Woods Region 19. Franconia Notch State Park 35. Governor Wentworth 50. Hannah Duston Memorial of 9 Franconia Notch Parkway, Franconia Historic Site Historic Site 1. Androscoggin Wayside Possibilities 823-8800 Rich in history and natural wonders; 56 Wentworth Farm Rd, Wolfeboro 271-3556 298 US Route 4 West, Boscawen 271-3556 The timeless and dramatic beauty of the 1607 Berlin Rd, Errol 538-6707 home of Cannon Mountain Aerial Tramway, Explore a pre-Revolutionary Northern Memorial commemorating the escape of Presidential Range and the Northeast’s highest Relax and picnic along the Androscoggin River Flume Gorge, and Old Man of the Mountain plantation. Hannah Duston, captured in 1697 during peak is yours to enjoy! Drive your own car or take a within Thirteen Mile Woods. Profile Plaza. the French & Indian War. comfortable, two-hour guided tour on the 36. Madison Boulder Natural Area , which includes an hour Mt. Washington Auto Road 2. Beaver Brook Falls Wayside 20. Lake Tarleton State Park 473 Boulder Rd, Madison 227-8745 51. Northwood Meadows State Park to explore the summit buildings and environment. 432 Route 145, Colebrook 538-6707 949 Route 25C, Piermont 227-8745 One of the largest glacial erratics in the world; Best of all, your entertaining guide will share the A hidden scenic gem with a beautiful waterfall Undeveloped park with beautiful views a National Natural Landmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioscienceenterprisezone 700.Pdf
    J U B E N LITTLE LEAGUE FIELDS SS IP R E E I X C Farmington River State Access Area R Second Natural Pond Last Natural Pond C V K T D A T R Y C D A Y N R R R S E WBER C A D D L R O I D D R R O U A O I R W D N T R N G S D R T T O V R A E D G D Y E R R N R C H ROM D I O L A D T R F D U D B E R W X E D N L E I R O Y O D I R R W N R V D O A R D M D L R R D N N R I E A E A I L Z T R G M A R Y N B R G A W Great Brook E N W A FARM BUILDING E E F R I G E N D F N E D O E I T R GR T N DR W R R L TO U G U O N B A N R I T D W H N T KE B X Poplar Swamp Brook NT R I L O AI S A W LE V Y D I G R C LL L T AG E G TUNXIS MEAD PARK E N N E I A R G P S L E M N 460301 S O I U A D N T R T A N ARKIN IN U L S W O AY L T A M D D O F R EN R WICK K E A D W R L O E L WHIT I T A V L R C N E O O T T T L A D N W O M T O R C O D H C U O E R R D N F P TUNXIS MEAD PARK S D T P E O A R RK R Great Brook M A I I L P N NE R T W D E S RE R M O D F Great Brook E D R S D TUNXIS MEAD PARK A T E M TOWN OF FARMINGTON R Pope Brook E S H D I O X Great Brook A N K U A H T IL L R HARTFORD COUNTY, R D TF L B RD P UN HILL E GALOW V A D TUNXIS MEAD PARK RD N HILL T O L VINE T CONNECTICUT E A G O I CT N BYRNE L I F M C R E OAK ESC FA O LA R N ND A R EN T V C T E T A 0 B P V G E 1 L D ¬« E RD EN PHEASANT HILL C H R S D M T APLE A South Reservoir V-FARM Oakland Gardens DG South Reservoir Dam R I E R D OAKLAND GARDENS FIRE STATION BIOSCIENCE A IL RD R L A GE D O U T E E ID IMBE LI N N Q R V E R L South Reservoir A T T R N O ES I C ER A R L ENTERPRISE ZONE V T A A O A T I U I D L D T O R N N R D R R B N D H L A I G T I L R C W L L D N I D R L I N E L H N D I R O N I H P T N N S S A L U I N U I A D T M A N S D I T R R T D N S U E SEWER TREATMENT PLANT S S R O O T D F .
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2011 Volume 23 Number 4
    HE ABITAT TA newsletter of the Connecticut H Association of Conservation and Inland Wetlands Commissions, Inc. winter 2011 volume 23 number 4 VERNON CONSERVATION COMMISSION IMPLEMENTS TOWN-WIDE INVASIVE AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM by Thomas Ouellette, Vernon Conservation Commission he Town of Vernon, led by the Conservation the Town’s Water Pollution Treatment Facility, and Commission and the Department of Parks then flows more than four miles south to Manchester. Tand Recreation, has been engaged since 2008 Within Vernon, the Hockanum River, which transits in a program to proactively identify, monitor, and industrial, commercial, residential and natural control populations of non-native invasive aquatic environments, is designated by the Connecticut plants within two principal Department of Energy and watersheds, and to plan for their Environmental Protection (DEEP) removal. Concerns relate to as impaired for recreation and for the exclusion of native aquatic habitat for fish, other aquatic life vegetation by proliferating and wildlife. non-native species, and to the resulting oxygen depletion and The Tankerhoosen River is a elimination of fish and wildlife tributary of the Hockanum River, habitat in surface waters. with headwaters in Tolland. Impairment of recreational From Walker Reservoir East activities, i.e., swimming, near I-84 Exit 67 in Vernon, boating, and fishing, are the Tankerhoosen extends also of concern. The town’s approximately five miles to its coordinated effort, which confluence with the Hockanum includes both professional field River at the Manchester town investigations and volunteer line. It is fed by a number of surveys as described below, streams, including Railroad may be instructive to other Brook, which originates at Bolton communities striving to protect Notch Pond in Bolton and flows the health of their rivers Hockanum River and Tankerhoosen River Watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Tolland, Connecticut Conservation Commission Shafran Conservation Area Management Plan Eaton Road, Tolland, CT
    Town of Tolland, Connecticut Conservation Commission Shafran Conservation Area Management Plan Eaton Road, Tolland, CT A Passive Recreation Open Space Conservation Area Adopted by Commission 2/12/2009; Revised 1/9/2014; Use change 3/13/2014 Adopted by Council 2/24/2009 Town of Tolland Conservation Commission Property Management Plan Shafran Conservation Area – 104 Eaton Road Background – The Tolland Conservation Commission is responsible for overseeing properties purchased by the Town of Tolland for conservation purposes and to prepare a management plan for each property. The management plans are based upon the environmental characteristics and outline the opportunities for public use. Each plan includes a property description, an analysis of the unique characteristics and acceptable uses of the property, and a management program. The management program outlines the property management and improvement needs; the individuals and organizations to manage the property; and resource capabilities and protection needs related to the site. Each management plan is developed under the Commission’s management planning process. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, RESOURCES, POTENTIAL, AND PROBLEMS Property Description – The Shafran Conservation area is a 65.3 acre parcel of land on the northerly side of Eaton Road in the northwest section of Tolland. It was purchased on June 24, 2002 from Raja Peggy and Dimitry Shafran with a combination of Town funds and a grant from the State of Connecticut Open Space and Watershed Land Acquisition program administered by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. The parcel abuts land owned and preserved by the Connecticut Water Company as part of the Shenipsit Lake Watershed. The lake serves as a public drinking water supply for Vernon, a portion of Tolland, the University of Connecticut and nearby towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Arts Landscape Study 2019
    GREATER HARTFORD Arts Landscape Study 2019 Greater Hartford Arts Landscape Study June 10, 2019 Prepared by Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 2 Report Structure .......................................................................................................................... 3 Benefits of the Arts ...................................................................................................... 4 Ecosystem ................................................................................................................... 6 Creative vitality in Greater Hartford higher than U.S. average .................................................. 6 Majority of Greater Hartford residents do not attend frequently ................................................ 8 But, they do attend more than the national average .................................................................... 9 Artists ........................................................................................................................ 10 Mixed experiences for Greater Hartford artists by discipline and role ..................................... 10 Greater Hartford lagging in artist job growth ........................................................................... 11 Organizations ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Connecticut Valley--A Highway for Bird Migration
    256 •A•, TheConnecticut Valley. [AAp•rril 2. An Adriatic-Tunisian route, along the coastsof the Adri- atic, Sicily to Tunis. ByLaridae (Larusridibundus); Scolopacidae; Gruidae;many small songbirds. 3. An Italian-Spanish route from Austria-Hungary via North Italy, Po Valley to Corsica,Sardinia, Baleuric Islands to South France and Spain:By Larldae; Charadriidae;Scolopacidae, etc. From 1903-1919, 7,778 birds were banded at Rossitten and, besides 123,569 bands were distributed to outsiders. Of these 7,778 banded birds, 2,011 have been accountedfor by reports received at the station. Observationsnow extending over 19 years have provedconclusively, that bandingis not injuriousto the birds and that it doesnot disturb or changetheir habits. All attacks made upon scienceby over-conscientiousbird protectors have been disprovenas based either upon misapprehensionor upon wilful misrepresentation. Berlin, Germany THE CONNECTICUT VALLEY--A HIG/-15VAY FOR BIRD MIGRATION. 1 BY AARON C. BAGG. Plates. XVI-XVII TrtAILSare perpetuallyfascinating. From the dawn of history the wanderingsof men and later, certain of their trade routes continuallyattract our attention. Justhow a groupbecame estab- lished in a given locality; by what route various hordespoured over a mountain-barrieror acrossa body of water; why another tribe did not remainsettled or stationarybut persistedin continual travel--all theseare problemswhich the studentof history likes to puzzleover. Soin the studyof ornithologythe routestraversed by birds of passageequally charm the studentor the layman. Long beforewhite men bravedthe mad Atlantic to explorea new world or the warriors of the Six Nations established the now • Paper read before the Allen Bird Club of Springfield, Mass., Feb. 6, 1922. My grateful acknowledgments are due Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire Granite State Ambassadors Great North Woods
    New Hampshire Granite State Ambassadors www.NHGraniteStateAmbassadors.org Regional Resource & Referral Guide: Great North Woods Region Use this document filled with local referrals from Granite State Ambassadors & State Welcome Center attendants as an informational starting point for guest referrals. For business referrals, please reference your local brochures & guides. Hidden Gems: ● Baby Flume Gorge, 1212 NH 26 West, Dixville Notch – short walk inside Dixville Notch State Park to a waterfall within a small, narrow gorge. The Cascade Brook Falls are across the road about ¼ mile. (https://www.nhstateparks.org/visit/state-parks/dixville-notch-state- park) ● Beaver Brook Falls, NH 145, Colebrook – About 2.5 miles north of Colebrook on the right- hand side of the road. (https://www.chamberofthenorthcountry.com/blog/best-bets-north- country-waterfalls) ● Pondcherry Wildlife Refuge, Airport Rd., Whitefield – Off NH 115, hiking trails, owned and managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in partnership with NH Audubon and NH Department of Fish and Game. (http://www.nhaudubon.org/pondicherry-wildlife-refuge/) ● Lake Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge and NH 16 North along the Thirteen Mile Woods for moose watching and beautiful landscapes. (https://www.fws.gov/refuge/umbagog/) Curiosity: ● North Hill Cemetery, off NH 145, Stewartstown Hollow in Stewartstown – Grave of Metallak was the last Indian living in NH who had not gone to Canada or assimilated into early 19th century American culture. https://www.chamberofthenorthcountry.com/historical- attractions.html) ● 45th Parallel, NH 145, Clarksville – Located in triangular plot at junction of NH 145 and Clarksville Pond Road. At this point you stand at longitude 71 degrees, 24 degrees west from Greenwich, England and half-way between the equator and the north pole.
    [Show full text]