To Discontinue the Wakeman School and Arts College, Shrewsbury

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

To Discontinue the Wakeman School and Arts College, Shrewsbury DETERMINATION Case reference: STP/000558 Proposal: To discontinue The Wakeman School and Arts College, Shrewsbury Proposer: Shropshire County Council Date of decision: 28 November 2011 Determination Under the powers conferred on me by Schedule 2 to the Education and Inspections Act 2006, I hereby approve the proposal to discontinue the st Wakeman School and Arts College, Shrewsbury on 31 August 2013. The referral 1. On 27th September, 2011, Shropshire Council (“the Council”) wrote to the Office of the Schools Adjudicator, referring its proposal made under section15 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 (“the Act”) for consideration under Schedule 2 of the Act. Its proposal to close the Wakeman School and Arts College, Shrewsbury (“Wakeman”), a community secondary school, on 31st August 2013 was published on 1st July 2011 (the notice replacing an earlier one that had given an erroneous prospective closure date) and was approved by the Council’s Cabinet on 7th September 2011. Jurisdiction 2. The proposal has been referred to me for a decision to be made because of a request by the Diocese of Lichfield (“the Diocese”), in its letters to the Council of September 2011 (undated) and of 27th September 2011 for the matter to be referred to the Adjudicator under paragraph 14 of Schedule 2 to the Act. 3. I am satisfied that I have jurisdiction to determine the proposal in accordance with the Act and the Regulations made thereunder, namely The School Organisation (Establishment and Discontinuance of Schools) (England) Regulations 2007. Procedures 4. In considering this matter I have had regard to all relevant legislation and guidance. 5. I have considered all the papers put before me including: 1 the Council’s referral letter with prescribed information as set out in the relevant regulations; the Diocese’s letters to the Council requesting referral to the Adjudicator, its explanatory letter to me of 18th October 2011, and a further letter of 7th November 2011; the Council’s consultation document, papers recording the Council’s processes of consultation and decision making, a summary of the written responses to the consultation, the Council’s analysis of these responses, and further submissions of 10th, 15th and 17th November 2011; a copy of the published notice, and a copy of a previous erroneous notice which has been superseded; representations from Wakeman, together with a record of correspondence with the Council and with the Local Government Ombudsman, and a further submission from Wakeman of 9th November 2011; Ofsted reports for Wakeman and for Meole Brace School Science College (“Meole Brace”), and the Department for Education’s (“DfE”) Performance Table for both schools; the Net Capacity Assessments for Wakeman and Meole Brace; a letter from the chair of governors of Meole Brace of 23rd October 2011; and a large number of representations from people with an interest in the outcome of the proposal, largely from parents and others, opposing it, but with some, largely from educational professionals, supporting it. 6. I visited Wakeman and Meole Brace on 4th November to view at first hand the accommodation at both schools and their environs. I held a roundtable meeting on the same day, to gain a clearer understanding of various points from representatives of the Council, the Diocese, Wakeman and Meole Brace. I held a public meeting also on the same day, attended by representatives of the Council, the Diocese, Wakeman and Meole Brace, the local Member of Parliament and around 400 parents, pupils, governors, staff and local residents and others with an interest in the proposal. I have considered the information and representations put to me at those meetings, and the representations sent to me before and after the meetings. The Proposal 7. Wakeman has, for several years, been considerably undersubscribed, and the Council believes that it is in the interests of the education of children at Wakeman and across the County that Wakeman should close from 31st August 2013, with places being provided for most pupils at Meole Brace, with 2 no pupils being admitted to Years 7 or 10 in September 2012 and with places being offered at Meole Brace to Year 9 pupils in 2012 and Years 8 and 9 in 2013. Views on the Proposals 8. The Diocese’s request for referral to the Adjudicator was based on a resolution by the Diocesan Board of Education at its meeting on 21st June 2011 and its concerns: a. that the case for closing Wakeman appeared exclusively financial; b. that Wakeman is a good school, with some excellent facilities and results, and that the case for closure had not been adequately made; and c. that alternatives such as federation, strategic partnerships and other forms of collaboration had not been sufficiently investigated. 9. The Diocese has outlined the evidence for its assessment of Wakeman as good and improving, believes that recruitment has been blighted by rumours of closure and that Wakeman’s capacity will be needed in Shrewsbury in ten years’ time, and has expressed concern at the Council’s approach to school organisation. The Diocese has acknowledged that it would like to develop links with Wakeman if it remains open, but has stated that this prospect is incidental to its decision to cause referral to the Adjudicator. 10. In its response to the Diocese’s case, the Council has drawn attention to the following factors. a. The financial case for closure is predicated on demography. Shrewsbury secondary schools have seen a fall of 613 pupils between 2003 and 2011; numbers are expected to continue to fall until 2015, before a limited recovery to the 2011 levels by 2019. Wakeman has steadily lost pupils since 2002-03, and now has fewer than 250 pupils, who could be accommodated in other Shrewsbury schools. Wakeman is forecast to have a deficit of £103,000 in 2011-12, rising to a cumulative amount of around £640,000 by 2012-13 on the basis of around 240 pupils. The Council estimates that the cost per pupil place at Wakeman would be around £6,947 in 2011-12 and around £10,347 in 2012-13, compared with a Dedicated Schools Grant (“DSG”) allocation of £4,611 and compared with a cost of £4,131 at Meole Brace. b. The educational case for closure is not based upon unsatisfactory standards at Wakeman, but upon the effect of depleting the funds available for all schools in the County by continuing to maintain Wakeman. Of the criteria set by the County for reviewing the position of individual secondary schools, Wakeman was found to meet those relating to: 3 i. concern of performance over a three year period; ii. significant surplus capacity; iii. small school size; iv. the accessibility of alternative provision; and v. the availability of alternative capacity. c. The Council has considered alternative proposals, to enable Wakeman to remain viable, but has not found them to be feasible. 11. Wakeman has responded to the proposal by drawing attention to the disturbance to current pupils’ education that closure would entail, and the reduction of choice of schools that would result. It believes that rumours of closure and the consultation process itself have led to the diminution of pupil numbers on which the Council’s proposal rests. It has drawn attention to what it believes has been unfair practice on the part of the Council in allowing other secondary schools to expand at Wakeman’s expense. The March 2011 Ofsted report categorised Wakeman as ‘good with outstanding features’ and the 2011 GCSE results show it to be now above the county average for quality of provision. Wakeman has excellent accommodation, and has suggested a number of ‘dual use’ options that the Council has deemed impractical. The current surplus of secondary school places in Shrewsbury is a temporary phenomenon, and substitute provision would in due course need to be provided if Wakeman should close. Wakeman submits that data provided by the Council has been misleading or inaccurate. 12. The Meole Brace chair of governors, in his letter to me, has referred to the growing popularity and success of that school, its links with the local church, and the governors’ general support on financial grounds for the Council’s reorganisation intentions. 13. All of the 31 individual speakers at the public meeting I held spoke against the Council’s proposal to close Wakeman. They spoke of, among other issues: the ethos and quality of provision at Wakeman, particularly in relation to special educational needs (“SEN”); the importance of retaining a school at the heart of the town; the contribution to art that Wakeman makes in Shrewsbury; allegedly faulty data and reasoning about future demand for secondary places and about school finances; alleged lack of consultation with pupils; and the importance of ‘a system shaped by parents’. I am considering these issues carefully in the course of this adjudication. Most of the numerous representations that I received after my visit also offered reasons for retaining Wakeman, often from parents, former parents, pupils, former pupils and staff who value particular aspects of Wakeman’s character. However, a representative of the Shropshire School Governors Council expressed general support for the proposal. Consideration of Factors 14. I have considered carefully the processes followed by the Council prior 4 to and since the publication of the proposal to close Wakeman. The reports and minutes of Council decisions during 2010 and 2011 that have been supplied to me are in the public domain, and I do not intend to summarise them here. I will simply note that there is evidence that the issue of school finance, along with that of pupil numbers, was prominent as a cause for concern and action, together with concern to promote school improvement generally through the organisation of schools, including various kinds of collaboration.
Recommended publications
  • Development Centres – May to June 2018
    SHROPSHIRE HOCKEY ASSOCIATION Development Centres – May to June 2018 PLAYER INFORMATION Development Centres will now run in June and again in September to October, at various sites throughout the County. The Academy Centres will follow the October Development Centres. For boys and girls, near beginners through to county players. Concentrating on core skill coaching and game play. Players will be grouped based on experience. Players should bring a stick, shin pads, gum shield, a drink and appropriate clothing for the weather. All players are required to register with England Hockey at www.ehbplayersystem.co.uk. Where possible this should be done before the first session. If you are already registered please update your details. WELLINGTON: Wrekin College SHREWSBURY: Meole Brace School BOYS & GIRLS BOYS & GIRLS Year of birth: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06,07 Year of birth: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06,07 Cost £42 Cost £42 Wednesdays: 6pm-8pm Thursdays 6pm – 8pm 2nd May, 9th May , 16th May 7th June, 14th June, 21st June TELFORD: St Georges WHITCHURCH: Sir John Talbot School BOYS & GIRLS BOYS & GIRLS Year of birth: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06,07 Year of birth: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06,07 Cost £42 Cost £42 Sundays: 11am-1pm Thursdays 6pm – 8pm 10th June, 17th June, 24th June 7th June, 14th June, 21st June MUCH WENLOCK: William Brookes School OSWESTRY: Oswestry School BOYS & GIRLS BOYS & GIRLS Year of birth: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06,07 Year of birth: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06,07 Cost £42 Cost £42 Sundays: 11am-1pm Wednesdays 6pm – 8pm 6th May, 13th May, 20th May 6th June, 13th June, 20th June Payment: This can be made at the first session, please bring a cheque made payable to ‘Shropshire Hockey Association’.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Shropshire Academy Trust
    Registered number: 11552742 CENTRAL SHROPSHIRE ACADEMY TRUST TRUSTEES' REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 AUGUST 2020 CENTRAL SHROPSHIRE ACADEMY TRUST (A company limited by guarantee) CONTENTS Page Reference and administrative details 1 Trustees' report 2 - 11 Governance statement 12 - 15 Statement on regularity, propriety and compliance 16 Statement of Trustees' responsibilities 17 Independent auditors' report on the financial statements 18 - 20 Independent reporting accountant's report on regularity 21 - 22 Statement of financial activities incorporating income and expenditure account 23 Balance sheet 24 - 25 Statement of cash flows 26 Notes to the financial statements 27 - 53 CENTRAL SHROPSHIRE ACADEMY TRUST (A company limited by guarantee) REFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS Members W Dowell S Holgate J Walton Trustees C Benson (resigned 18 October 2020) J Bryans (appointed 5 June 2020) M Cribb OBE M Kilby D Pender (appointed 5 June 2020) C Perry (resigned 16 July 2020) C Mathews M Mortimer (resigned 21 August 2020) W Strachan (appointed 5 June 2020) A Sutton M C Wigley (appointed 16 July 2020) J Woodall Company registered number 11552742 Company name Central Shropshire Academy Trust Principal and registered Mary Webb School and Science College office Bogey Lane Pontesbury Shrewsbury Shropshire SY5 0TG Chief executive officer Mr P Johnstone Senior management team Pete Johnstone, Executive Principal, Belvidere School Headteacher (to 31 December 2019) and Accounting Officer Alan Doust, Meole Brace Headteacher, Meole
    [Show full text]
  • Committee and Date Cabinet 4 May 2011 10 Am
    , Committee and date Item No Cabinet 4 May 2011 8D 10 am Public Proposals to Close Wakeman Secondary School – Report on DfE Stage 1 (Pre- Statutory) Consultation Responsible Officer David Taylor Corporate Director – People’s Services Email: [email protected] Telephone: (01743) 252402 Summary On 15 February 2011, Cabinet commissioned pre-statutory consultation on proposals for the closure of The Wakeman School. This report details the outcomes from the consultation; the recommendation of the Corporate Director for People’s Services and asks Members to consider whether to proceed with formal (statutory) proposals. Recommendations Cabinet is recommended to: (1) note the outcomes from the pre-statutory consultation; (2) proceed to formal proposals to close The Wakeman School with effect from 31 August 2013 and offer places to pupils on roll at the school at Meole Brace School Science College in line with the recommendation of the Corporate Director - People’s Services. No pupils would be admitted to year 7 or year 10 in September 2012. Pupils in Year 9 would be offered places in July 2012 in Meole Brace School Science College. Cabinet: 4 May 2011 – Wakeman Secondary 1. Background On 15 February 2011, Cabinet considered a report on the future organisation of Shropshire schools. At the meeting, Cabinet resolved to consult on 10 proposals to alter the organisation of schools in Shropshire. The consultation period ran from 28 February to 8 April 2011. A number of strategies were used to inform stakeholders and collect views. The outcomes are attached to this report. The report followed an extensive consultation on the vision and criteria which were to underpin school organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Parents' Guide to Education in Shropshire 2021/22
    Parents’ Guide to Education in Shropshire 2021/22 Closing Date: PRIMARY applications 15 January 2021 Closing Date: SECONDARY applications 31 October 2020 Apply online at www.shropshire.gov.uk/schooladmissions Apply online at www.shropshire.gov.uk/schooladmissions Apply online at www.shropshire.gov.uk/schooladmissions Apply online at www.shropshire.gov.uk/schooladmissions Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Making an Application ......................................................................................................................... 5 Early Years The Application Process ....................................................................................................................... 6 Early Education..................................................................................................................................... 7 Primary Schools .................................................................................................................................... 9 Primary Oversubscription Criteria for Shropshire Community & Voluntary Controlled Primary Schools ...... 12 Admissions Flow Chart – Primary ...................................................................................................... 14 Oversubscription Criteria for Own Admission Authority Primary Schools ........................................ 15 Maps and Lists of Primary Schools in Shropshire .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minsterley Eisteddfod Mary Webb Singers 1 Saturday 18Th March, 2017 Head Teacher Update 2
    Webberzine Inside this issue... Minsterley Eisteddfod Mary Webb Singers 1 Saturday 18th March, 2017 Head Teacher Update 2 The Big Bang 3 STEM Curriculum Day 4-7 The Winter’s Tale 8 Accelerated Reader 9 Library News 10 Music at Mary Webb 11 Battlefield & Trenches 12 Sport at Mary Webb/ 13 The Mary Webb Singers came 2nd in this years’ Minsterley Eisteddfod. Junior Scientist/ 14-15 We all had a good time and performed really well. The competition was challenging this year with 5 choirs competing. Severndale @ Mary 16 Next year we will be aiming for 1st place. by Megan Richards 9S Webb Shropshire Youth 17 Our singers are Isobel Raven, Melody Cooke, Megan Allen-Brown, Inspirational Sparks 18 Megan Richards, Estelle Mole, Savannah Male, Katie Heath, Chloe Price, Cerys Jones, Rob Hanmer, Abi Marshall, Alice Downes, Meta Personal 19 Shiner, Lucy Wagstaff and Jack Lucas. (Missing from the line-up is Jack Thompson, Kate Heathorn, Millie Holloway and Owen Evenson who 100% Attendance 20 were unable to attend due to other commitments and Annie Morris who was taking the photo!) Charity 21 Sponsors/adverts 22-23 The feedback from the adjudicator was very positive mentioning … ”a confident performance that was well prepared with clear words and crisp Summer Term Dates 24 diction. A well prepared and enjoyable programme!” Further to Mary Webb School Choir doing so well, we have more congratulations to offer other student participants. See our Music Department news items on page 11 Page 1 SPRING 2017 Head Teacher Update Charity Fund Raising This time last year I was thanking students, staff and parents for their collective effort in raising money for Sport Relief and Pontesbury Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Your School
    URN DFE School Name Does your Does your Is your Number school school meet our school our attainment eligible? Ever6FSM criteria? 137377 8734603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ncriteria? N N 137083 3835400 Abbey Grange Church of England Academy N N N 131969 8654000 Abbeyfield School N N N 138858 9284069 Abbeyfield School N Y Y 139067 8034113 Abbeywood Community School N Y Y 124449 8604500 Abbot Beyne School N Y Y 102449 3125409 Abbotsfield School N Y Y 136663 3115401 Abbs Cross Academy and Arts College N N N 135582 8946906 Abraham Darby Academy Y Y Y 137210 3594001 Abraham Guest Academy N Y Y 105560 3524271 Abraham Moss Community School Y Y Y 135622 3946905 Academy 360 Y Y Y 139290 8884140 Academy@Worden N Y Y 135649 8886905 Accrington Academy N Y Y 137421 8884630 Accrington St Christopher's Church of England High School N N N 111751 8064136 Acklam Grange School A Specialist Technology College for Maths and Computing N Y Y 100053 2024285 Acland Burghley School Y Y Y 138758 9265405 Acle Academy N N Y 101932 3074035 Acton High School Y Y Y 137446 8945400 Adams' Grammar School N N N 100748 2094600 Addey and Stanhope School Y Y Y 139074 3064042 Addington High School Y Y Y 117512 9194029 Adeyfield School N Y Y 140697 8514320 Admiral Lord Nelson School N N N 136613 3844026 Airedale Academy N Y Y 121691 8154208 Aireville School N N Y 138544 8884403 Albany Academy N N N 137172 9374240 Alcester Academy N N N 136622 9375407 Alcester Grammar School N N N 124819 9354059 Alde Valley School N N Y 134283 3574006 Alder Community High School N Y Y 119722 8884030
    [Show full text]
  • Meole Brace School URN: 123573 Longden Road Shrewsbury Shro
    Existing academy: Meole Brace School URN: 146146 Predecessor school: Meole Brace School URN: 123573 Longden Road Shrewsbury Shropshire SY3 9DW Academy conversion and predecessor schools Under the Academies Act 2010, schools may apply to the Secretary of State to convert to academy status. Such schools are known as academy converters. Upon conversion to academy status the existing school closes and a new school opens in its place. Although little may have changed, the academy converter is a new legal entity. Most academy converters have yet to have a section 5 inspection. However, to assist parents and other interested parties, information about, and the inspection history of the school which preceded the new academy are available here. The link to the predecessor school will be removed when the school has been closed for either three or five years depending on the date of closure, and removed from the Ofsted website. Information about when closed providers are removed from the website is online at http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/about-us/faqs It is important to note that, as the academy converter is a new school, which may not yet have been inspected, the inspection judgements of the predecessor school are not those of the new academy. However, the most recent inspection judgements of the predecessor school are taken into account by Ofsted for the purpose of scheduling the first inspection of the new academy converter. Some academy converters have replaced schools which were judged to be outstanding at their most recent Ofsted inspection. Under the Education Act 2011, most schools previously judged to be outstanding will be exempt from routine inspection.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee and Date Cabinet 7 September 2011 Item No Public Proposals to Close Wakeman School and Arts College – Report On
    Cabinet, 7 September 2011: Proposals to Close Wakeman School and Arts College – Report on DfE Stage 3 Statutory Period for Representations Committee and date Item No Cabinet 7 September 2011 6 Public Proposals to Close Wakeman School and Arts College – Report on DfE Stage 3 Statutory Period for Representations Responsible Officer David Taylor Corporate Director – People’s Services Email: [email protected] Telephone: (01743) 252402 Summary This paper reports the outcomes from the Statutory Period of Representations on the proposal to close Wakeman School and Arts College and offer continuing pupils places at Meole Brace School Science College. This paper follows an extensive period of consultation on school organisation in Shropshire. The recommendations brought forward follow significant efforts on the part of the Local Authority, the schools and their communities, to find alternative long term and viable solutions to the challenges faced. The report also sets out the statement of case and information for decision makers. Recommendations That Cabinet: (1) note the recommendation of the Corporate Director - People's Services that Cabinet should determine to close Wakeman School and Arts College, and offer continuing pupils a place in Meole Brace School and Science College; (2) approve the proposal to discontinue Wakeman School and Arts College, Abbey Foregate, Shrewsbury on 31 August 2013 in accordance with the proposals published by a Notice of Discontinuance dated 1 July 2011. 1 Cabinet, 7 September 2011: Proposals to Close Wakeman School and Arts College – Report on DfE Stage 3 Statutory Period for Representations 1. Background Over the past two years Shropshire Council has worked with schools, governors, Elected Members and local communities to review education provision for Shropshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Admission Arrangements 2022-2023
    Committee and Date Item Cabinet 8 February 2021 Public DETERMINATION OF ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS 2022-2023 Responsible Officer Karen Bradshaw - Executive Director of Children's Services e-mail: [email protected] Tel: (01743) 254201 1. Summary 1.1 In accordance with the School Admissions Code, consultation for 2022/23 must be completed by 31 January 2021 and arrangements must be determined before 28 February 2021. The admission arrangements are therefore brought to this Cabinet. 1.2 The School Admissions Code 2014 requires consultation on admission arrangements every 7 years where no changes are proposed. Shropshire Council, the admission authority for community and voluntary controlled schools in Shropshire, carried out a consultation on its admission arrangements last year for 2021/22 and these were determined by Cabinet on 12 February 2020. 1.3 In addition to minor changes linked to the designated catchment area for the new Bowbrook Primary School, the only other proposed change to Shropshire Council’s admission arrangements for 2022/23 is a change to the published admission number (PAN) of Stiperstones CE Primary School, now co-located with Norbury Primary School. Governors proposed a reduction to their PAN from 8 to 7 to ensure that numbers in Key Stage 1 remain within the infant class size legislation. The proposal was initiated by governors and Shropshire Council is the admission authority for the school, but the local authority is in agreement to the proposal. 1.4 Consultation on Shropshire Council’s admission arrangements for 2022/23 took place between Friday 11 December 2020 and Monday 25 January 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondaryschoolspendinganaly
    www.tutor2u.net Analysis of Resources Spend by School Total Spending Per Pupil Learning Learning ICT Learning Resources (not ICT Learning Resources (not School Resources ICT) Total Resources ICT) Total Pupils (FTE) £000 £000 £000 £/pupil £/pupil £/pupil 000 Swanlea School 651 482 1,133 £599.2 £443.9 £1,043.1 1,086 Staunton Community Sports College 234 192 426 £478.3 £393.6 £871.9 489 The Skinners' Company's School for Girls 143 324 468 £465.0 £1,053.5 £1,518.6 308 The Charter School 482 462 944 £444.6 £425.6 £870.2 1,085 PEMBEC High School 135 341 476 £441.8 £1,117.6 £1,559.4 305 Cumberland School 578 611 1,189 £430.9 £455.1 £885.9 1,342 St John Bosco Arts College 434 230 664 £420.0 £222.2 £642.2 1,034 Deansfield Community School, Specialists In Media Arts 258 430 688 £395.9 £660.4 £1,056.4 651 South Shields Community School 285 253 538 £361.9 £321.7 £683.6 787 Babington Community Technology College 268 290 558 £350.2 £378.9 £729.1 765 Queensbridge School 225 225 450 £344.3 £343.9 £688.2 654 Pent Valley Technology College 452 285 737 £339.2 £214.1 £553.3 1,332 Kemnal Technology College 366 110 477 £330.4 £99.6 £430.0 1,109 The Maplesden Noakes School 337 173 510 £326.5 £167.8 £494.3 1,032 The Folkestone School for Girls 325 309 635 £310.9 £295.4 £606.3 1,047 Abbot Beyne School 260 134 394 £305.9 £157.6 £463.6 851 South Bromsgrove Community High School 403 245 649 £303.8 £184.9 £488.8 1,327 George Green's School 338 757 1,096 £299.7 £670.7 £970.4 1,129 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys 211 309 520 £297.0 £435.7 £732.7 709 Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Historical Society
    ISSN 0143-5175 Shropshire History and Archaeology Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Historical Society (incorporating the Shropshire Parish Register Society) VOLUME LXXXVII edited by D. T. W. Price SHREWSBURY 2012 (ISSUED IN 2014) © Shropshire Archaeological and Historical Society 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the Shropshire Archaeological and Historical Society. Produced and printed by 4word Ltd., Bristol COUNCIL AND OFFICERS 1 APRIL 2014 President SIR NEIL COSSONS, O.B.E., M.A., F.S.A. Vice-Presidents ERNIE JENKS MADGE MORAN, F.S.A. M. UNA REES, B.A., PH.D. B. S. TRINDER, M.A., PH.D., F.S.A. Elected Members NIGEL BAKER, B.A., PH.D., F.S.A., M.I.F.A. MARY F. MCKENZIE, M.A., M.AR.AD. NEIL CLARKE, B.A. MARTIN SPEIGHT, B.A., PH.D. ROBERT CROMARTY, B.A. ROGER WHITE, B.A., PH.D., M.I.F.A. HUGH HANNAFORD, M.I.F.A. ANDYWIGLEY, B.SC., M.A., PH.D., F.S.A., P.C.H.E. W. F. HODGES Chairman JAMES LawsON, M.A., Westcott Farm, Habberley, Shrewsbury SY5 0SQ Hon. Secretary and Hon. Publications Secretary G. C. BAUGH, M.A., F.S.A., Glebe House, Vicarage Road, Shrewsbury SY3 9EZ Hon. Treasurer FRANCESCA BUMPUS, M.A., PH.D., 9 Alexandra Avenue, Meole Brace, Shrewsbury SY3 9HT Hon. Membership Secretary PENNY WARD, M.A., M.I.F.A., 1 Crewe Street, Shrewsbury SY3 9QF Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • EDUCATION, C.1600–2000 Introduction Private Schools
    Judith Everard March 2017 EDUCATION, c.1600–2000 Introduction The Royal Free Grammar School was founded in 1552 by and for the benefit of the townspeople and under its original statutes was to offer free places to the sons of burgesses. This obligation, long redundant due to the lapse of burgess status, was abolished in 1868, with most pupils historically coming from outside the borough.1 Small numbers of those admitted as freemen of the borough in this period were designated ‘schoolmaster’. The frankpledge list for 1668 contains two schoolmasters, and those for 1709 and 1731 name four each (from 1650 to 1775, no more than one ‘schoolmaster’ was admitted in each 25- year period).2 In 1690, Edward Griffiths, churchwarden of St Alkmund, was cited before the bishop’s court ‘for teaching school without license’.3 In fact, as befitted the county town, Shrewsbury had a whole range of schools and educational provision before the 17th century, most of it informal and hard to trace in the records; the first systematic census dates from 1817.4 But there was a developing range of endowed schools which offered education to the sons and daughters of townspeople. This chapter commences with a brief account of the private educational provision from the 17th century before returning to the education of ‘the poor’ and the population at large. Private Schools By the late 17th century there was at least one well regarded private school for girls: a finishing school run by Esther Chambre and Barbery Saxfield ‘in the more fashionable part of Castle Ward near St Mary’s Church’.
    [Show full text]