agronomy

Article Investigation of Seed transmission in belbahrii the Causal Agent of Basil

Lidan Falach-Block, Yariv Ben-Naim and Yigal Cohen * Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel; [email protected] (L.F.-B.); [email protected] (Y.B.-N.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +972-35318251

 Received: 9 April 2019; Accepted: 20 April 2019; Published: 23 April 2019 

Abstract: Downy mildew in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) caused by the pathogen Peronospora belbahrii Thines was first recorded in Israel in 2011. Within one year, the pathogen has spread all over the country, causing devastating economic damage to basil crops. Similar outbreaks were reported in Europe, the USA, and Asia. Seed transmission and seedling trade were suggested as possible explanations for this rapid spread. Here, we show that P. belbahrii can develop systemically in artificially inoculated basil plants in growth chambers. It may reach remote un-inoculated parts of the plant including the axillary buds but not the roots or seeds. To verify whether transmission of the disease occurs via seeds, we harvested seeds from severely infected, field-grown basil plants. Harvests were done in four seasons, from several basil cultivars growing in three locations in Israel. Microscopic examinations revealed external contamination with sporangia of P. belbahrii of untreated seeds, but not of surface-sterilized seeds. Pathogen-specific PCR assays confirmed the occurrence of the pathogen in untreated seeds, but not in surface-sterilized seeds. Contaminated seeds were grown (without disinfection) in pasteurized soil in growth chambers until the four–six leaf stage. None of several thousand plants showed any symptom or sporulation of downy mildew. PCR assays conducted with several hundred plants grown from contaminated seeds proved no latent infection in plants developed from such seeds. The results confirmed that (i) P. belbahrii can spread systemically in basil plants, but does not reach their roots or seeds; (ii) sporangia of P. belbahrii may contaminate the surface, but not the internal parts, of seeds produced by infected basil plants in the field: and (iii) contaminated seeds produce healthy plants, which carry no latent infection. The data suggest that P. belbahrii in Israel is seed-borne, but not seed-transmitted.

Keywords: basil downy mildew; epidemiology; ; over-seasoning; systemic infection

1. Introduction Sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum) is an economically important herb due to its pleasant aroma and taste. Basil downy mildew (BDM) caused by the oomycete Peronospora belbahrii is currently the most destructive disease of sweet basil worldwide [1]. It was first reported in Uganda in 1932 [2], then emerging in Switzerland in 2001 [3], USA in 2009 [4], and in Israel in 2011 [5]. Typically, the disease appears in the field as chlorotic lesions on leaves, which gradually turn necrotic and abscise. Under favorable humid conditions, a characteristic purplish, furry growth of sporangiophores, and sporangia is evident on the lower epidermis of infected leaves. Oospores were erratically seen inside the mesophyll of infected leaves [5]. The reasons for the sudden appearance and quick global spread of the pathogen are not known. They may be related to infected seeds and/or trade of basil cuttings [1,3,6]. Another reason may be related to latent infection of P. belbahrii in basil plants [7]. Latent infection is known to occur in other downy mildews such as Peronospora halstedii in sunflowers [8] and Peronospora effusa in spinach [9].

Agronomy 2019, 9, 205; doi:10.3390/agronomy9040205 www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 2 of 11

Garibaldi et al. [6] and Farahani-Kofoet et al. [7] reported on systemic infection of this pathogen and its transmission by seeds. Garibaldi et al. [6] tested basil seeds samples from various sources in two locations in Italy and observed downy mildew in 4 out of 16 samples at 0.33%–0.66% incidence of infected plants. Farahani-Kofoet et al. [7] detected P. belbahrii by PCR in 80%–90% of randomly investigated commercial seed stock samples. Wick (see Wyenandt et al. [10]) recovered sporangiophores and sporangia in wash water of basil seeds (previously tested positive for BDM by PCR). Gilardi et al. [11] and Pintore et al. [12] used isolates of P. belbahrii that were originated from infected basil seeds. Wyenandt et al. [13] demonstrated that basil seeds, regardless of basil species and whether symptoms are visible on foliage or the plant is immune or resistant to downy mildew, can test positive for the presence of P. belbahrii using a real-time PCR assay following exposure of plants to the pathogen during the natural development of downy mildew under field conditions. Wyenandt et al. [13] did not germinate the seeds to follow whether or not downy mildew develops on the seedlings. None of the above studies, however, reported on the occurrence of P. belbahrii inside the seed/embryo of basil. The downy mildews constitute a distinct fungal-like group due to their molecular, morphological and epidemiological characteristics. Some cause local lesions only (e.g., Pseusoperonospora cubensis in cucurbits, Bremia lactuca in lettuce, Peronospora manshurica in ), while others cause systemic infection (e.g., Scleropora sorghi in maize, Pseudoperonospora humuli in hop, P. halsdedii in sunflower) [14]. Seed transmission is known to occur in systemic downy mildews such as sunflower downy mildew caused by P. halstedii [15] as well as in non-systemic downy mildews such as cucurbit downy mildew caused by P. cubensis [16]. The aim of the present study was to examine the ability of P. belbahrii to spread systemically in basil plants, with the premise that systemic spread may allow the pathogen to reach the seeds and thus enables seed infection and transmission of the disease. We also examined the ability of P. belbahrii to cause latent infection in basil plants. Latent infection may explain the rapid global spread of the disease. We used symptoms, sporulation, microscopy and PCR to follow the presence of the pathogen in seeds and plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Pathogen The systemic spread of the pathogen in basil plants was studied with isolate Knafo-3 of P. belbahrii. This isolate was collected in 2013 from infected basil plants on the farm of A. Knafo in Ein-Tamar, Southern Jordan Valley, Israel. It is resistant to mefenoxam, but sensitive to mandipropamid, dimethomorph, and oxathiapiprolin. This isolate is very aggressive to all sweet basil varieties grown in the country but avirulent to varieties carrying the Pb1 resistance gene [17]. We maintained it by repeated inoculations of Sweet Basil plants in growth chambers at 25 ◦C.

2.2. Plants The systemic spread of the pathogen was studied with the susceptible Ocimum basilicum ‘Sweet Basil’ (Genovese type, Genesis Seeds Ltd., Ashalim, Israel). Plants were grown in 250 mL pots filled with peat/perlite, 1:1, v/v, one plant per pot. Sowing was done at weekly intervals in order to obtain plants of different ages. Plants were grown in the greenhouse and used when reached the desired age. Seeds were always stored in aluminum bags at 4 ◦C.

2.3. Inoculation Sporangia of P. belbahrii were washed from freshly sporulating leaves into cold distilled water and the suspension was adjusted to 1 104 sporangia/mL. One 10 µL droplet of spore suspension was × inoculated onto the upper surface of each cotyledon or leaf of plants of different ages as demonstrated in Figure1. Control plants were similarly treated with tap water. The control and inoculated plants were placed overnight in a dew chamber at 18 ◦C in the dark to ensure infection. Care was taken to Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 3 of 11

Agronomy 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 11 avoid any contact between the plants. The plants were then placed in a growth chamber at 25 ◦C µ 2 1 (60%–70%(60%–70% RH) under RH) undercontinuous continuous illumination illumination (60 (60 µmolmol m 2 ss−−1) to allowallow for for symptom symptom production. production. At At 7–14 days post inoculation (dpi), symptoms were recorded and the plants were placed overnight at 7–14 days post inoculation (dpi), symptoms were recorded and the plants were placed overnight at 100%RH at 20 ◦C in darkness to allow for sporulation of the pathogen. 100%RH at 20 °C in darkness to allow for sporulation of the pathogen.

Figure 1.Figure Experimental 1. Experimental design design for fortesting testing the the systemic systemic spreadspread of ofPeronospora Peronospora belbahrii belbahriiin basil in plants. basil plants. Plants of various ages, from the cotyledons stage to the 12-leaf stage, were inoculated on two leaves Plants of various ages, from the cotyledons stage to the 12-leaf stage, were inoculated on two leaves per plant with two 10 µL droplets (orange dots) each containing 100 sporangia of the pathogen.

per plantThe with inoculated two 10 pair µL of droplets leaves were (orange located dots) above theeach red containing ring on the stem.100 sporangia The inoculated of the plants pathogen. were The

inoculatedincubated pair of in leaves a dew chamber were located to allow above infection the and red thereafter ring on at 25the◦C stem. to develop The systemicinoculated infection. plants were incubatedWater-inoculated in a dew chamber plants servedto allow as controls. infection and thereafter at 25 °C to develop systemic infection. Water-inoculated2.4. Disease Assessment plants served as controls. Disease symptoms and sporulation were visually estimated at 7, 10, or 14 dpi, as described 2.4. Diseasebefore Assessment [18], depending on plant age at time of inoculation.

Disease2.5. Microscopy symptoms and sporulation were visually estimated at 7, 10, or 14 dpi, as described before [18], depending on plant age at time of inoculation. Stem internodes were excised from the inoculated plants and processed as described before [19]. Briefly, stem internodes (1 cm long) were sectioned longitudinally with a razor blade into thin (about 2.5. Microscopy0.5 mm) slices. They were clarified in boiling ethanol, placed in aniline blue solution (0.05% aniline blue Stemin internodes 0.05 M K2HPO were4, pH excised 8.9) at 4 ◦fromC for 24the h, inoculat stained withed plants 0.01% calcofluor and processed (Sigma) andas described examined with before [19]. an Olympus A70 epi-fluorescent microscope. Fungal structures inside the stem showed green-yellow Briefly, stemfluorescence. internodes To observe (1 cm thelong) pathogen were sectioned on seeds, untreated longitudinally seeds were with placed a razor (5 seeds blade per into group, thin (about 0.5 mm)10 slices. groups They per seed were batch) clarified on a glass in slide,boiling 20 µ Lethanol, sterile water placed were in added aniline per group, blue andsolution seeds were(0.05% to aniline blue in 0.05covered M K with2HPO a glass4, pH cover 8.9) slip.at 4 Seeds°C for were 24 h, examined stained at with 30 min 0.01% after preparationcalcofluor with(Sigma) a dissecting and examined microscope at 400 magnification. with an Olympus A70× epi-fluorescent microscope. Fungal structures inside the stem showed green- yellow fluorescence.2.6. DNA Extraction To observe the pathogen on seeds, untreated seeds were placed (5 seeds per group, 10 groups per seed batch) on a glass slide, 20 µL sterile water were added per group, and DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB-protocol [20]. Stem internodes, hypocotyls, roots, seeds wereaxillary to covered buds, apices, with whole a glass seedlings cover orslip. seeds Seed weres were placed examined in aluminum at 30 foil min and after frozen preparation in liquid with a dissectingnitrogen. microscope Special precautions at x400 magnification. (changing gloves and disinfesting cutting tools) were taken to prevent cross-contamination of samples. The samples were groundto powder with a mortar and pestle and 2.6. DNAcollected Extraction into 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. CTAB extraction buffer (600 µL, 100 mM Tris pH 8, 1.4 M DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB-protocol [20]. Stem internodes, hypocotyls, roots, axillary buds, apices, whole seedlings or seeds were placed in aluminum foil and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Special precautions (changing gloves and disinfesting cutting tools) were taken to prevent cross-contamination of samples. The samples were groundto powder with a mortar and pestle and collected into 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. CTAB extraction buffer (600 µL, 100 mM Tris pH 8, 1.4 M sodium chloride, 20 mM EDTA, 2% CTAB, 0.5% mercaptoethanol) was added, and the tubes were vortexed and incubated at 65 °C for 60 min. Chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (400 µL, 24: 1) was added, the tubes were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 11,200 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred into a new 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, 500 µL of chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24: 1) and 400 µL of CTAB extraction buffer were added, the tubes were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 11,200 rpm for 15 min for the second time. The supernatant was transferred into a new 1.5 mL Eppendorf

Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 4 of 11 sodium chloride, 20 mM EDTA, 2% CTAB, 0.5% mercaptoethanol) was added, and the tubes were vortexed and incubated at 65 ◦C for 60 min. Chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (400 µL, 24: 1) was added, the tubes were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 11,200 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred into a new 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, 500 µL of chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24: 1) and 400 µL of CTAB extraction buffer were added, the tubes were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 11,200 rpm for 15 min for the second time. The supernatant was transferred into a new 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube, 500 µL of isopropanol was added, the tubes were vortexed and placed in 20 C overnight. The tubes − ◦ were centrifuged at 11,200 rpm for 15 min, and the DNA pellet was rinsed with 500 µL ice-cold 70% ethanol for 5 min in room temperature. The tubes were centrifuged at 11,200 rpm for 15 min, and the DNA pellet was dissolved in 50-µL HPLC water, incubated at 65 C for 5 min and placed in 20 C. ◦ − ◦ DNA was similarly extracted from sporangia of P. belbahrii.

2.7. PCR Detection of the pathogen was done with the following specific primers of the genomic ribosomal DNA (ITS1) of P. belbahrii [3]:

Bas-F: CCGTACAACCCAATAATTTGGGGGTTAAT Bas-R: TTCAATTAGCTACTTGTTCAGACAAAG)

This pair produces a single DNA band of approximately 134 base pairs in size. The total volume of the reaction mixture was 15 µL and contained 7.5 µL Hy-Taq Ready Mix (2 ), 0.3 µl of each Bas × primer, 5.9 µL of nuclease-free water, and 1 µL of DNA sample (80–100ng/µL) or HPLC water for negative controls. PCR amplification was performed in the MultiGeneTM OptiMax Thermal Cycler (Labnet International Inc., Edison, NJ, USA) with the following cycle parameters: Initial denaturation at 95 ◦C for 5 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 ◦C foe 30 sec, annealing at 63 ◦C for 30 sec, extension at 72 ◦C for 30 sec and termination at 72 ◦C for 5 min. The PCR products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in TBE buffer (40 mM of Tris-borat, pH 8.0, 1 mM of EDTA) at 130 V for 40 min and stained with ethidium bromide. The Gene Direx (Taoyuan, Taiwan) 100 bp DNA ladder was run on the same gel. The gel was placed under UV light in order to identify the DNA bands.

2.8. Direct Inoculation of Seeds and Roots To examine the ability of sporangia to cause infection of seeds, commercial seeds (‘Sweet Basil’) were sown in pots containing moistened pasteurized potting mixture, 10 seeds per pot. Seeds were inoculated by placing a 50 µL droplet of fresh sporangial suspension (1 104 sporangia/mL) on each × seed before covering with the potting mixture. To examine the ability of sporangia to cause infection of roots, 10 mL of fresh sporangial suspension (1 104 sporangia/mL) were drenched onto the soil surface × of potted basil plants at the cotyledon or 2-leaf stage (2–5 plants per 250 mL pot). Pots and plants were 2 1 incubated in a growth chamber at 20 ◦C (60%–70% RH, 14h light/day, 60 µmol m s− ) and seedlings were examined visually for disease symptoms during 4 weeks after inoculation. Thereafter, PCR assays were performed to determine whether the pathogen is present in the plants in a latent form.

2.9. Seed Infection and Transmission Multiple experiments were conducted to study seed infection and disease transmission via basil seeds. Three cultivars of basil were studied during 2012–2017: ‘Peri’ (Genovese cutting type, Volcani Center for Agricultural Research, Israel), ‘Sweet Basil‘ (Genovese type, Genesis Ltd., Ashalim, Israel), and ’Genoveser’ (broad Italian leaf type, Ball Straathof, South Africa). Two seed samples (Peri) were obtained in summer 2012 from Hishtil Nurseries Ltd. (Petach Tikva, Israel). The first sample was harvested from healthy basil plants and the other from BDM-infected basil plants. Seed samples were assayed by PCR (3 50 seeds per sample) for the presence of P. belbahrii and × other seeds (~1000 seeds per sample) were grown in pasteurized soil in growth chambers to the 4-leaf stage, and examined for symptoms of BDM and for the presence of P. belbahrii by PCR. Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 5 of 11

In Mid-March of 2016 and 2017, about five hundred 12-leaf basil plants (‘Sweet Basil’) were planted in a 6 50 m net houses (covered with a 50 mesh white plastic net) located at BIU farm on × campus. The plants were spray inoculated with spore suspension of isolate Knafo 3 of P. belbahrii in early April in both years, after they had reached the 18–20 leaf stage. Symptoms including sporulation were first observed at 7 and 9 days post inoculation in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Temperature was favorable for disease development [21] in both years. The disease reached the top of the plants in mid-June at about flowering time. To examine seed infection and BDM transmission, seeds (including the petals and calyx) were harvested in July of both years. In 2016, about 5000 seeds were collected from about 100 infected plants. The floral parts were removed and two subsamples of 150 seeds were taken for DNA extraction. The other seeds (about 4700) were sown in pasteurized soil in pots, 10 seeds per pot. About 1000 commercial seeds (Sweet Basil and Peri) were similarly sown as controls. Plants were grown in a 2 1 growth chamber at 22 ◦C (60%–70% RH, 14 h light a day, 60 µmole.m− s− ). When they reached the 4-leaf stage, plants were examined for symptoms of BDM and then assayed by PCR, 15 samples of 10 plants per sample from each seed batch, for the presence of pathogen in their tissues. In 2017, about 13,700 seeds were harvested from about 200 infected plants. They were divided into two batches: seeds of one batch (~9400 seeds) were separated from their floral parts (petals and calyx) and sown in pasteurized potting mixture without disinfection, 10 seeds per pot. Seeds of the other batch (~4300) were similarly sown, but with their petal and calyx (carrying sporangia) attached. About 1000 commercial seeds (Sweet Basil and Peri) were similarly sown as controls. Plants were grown as above and when reached the 4–6 leaf stage they were examined for symptoms and sporulation of BDM and then taken for PCR assays, 5–22 samples of 10 plants per sample from each seed batch. In 2018, seeds were collected from the following five basil cultivars growing at Ashalim in southern Israel: Emily 42, Emily 47, Emily 201, Edwina 5 (broaden Italian leaf), and an experimental line 1241 (Genovese type). Plants were all heavily infected with an isolate called “M” of P. belbahrii at time of harvest. Unlike isolate Knafo 3, isolate M was pathogenic to also line 1241, which carries the Pb1 gene for resistance. To detect P. belbahrii in contaminated seeds (seeds collected from infected plants), two samples of 150 from each cultivar in each year were taken for DNA extraction. Seeds of one sample were disinfected to remove sporangia attached to their surface (one min soaking in 3% hypochlorite followed by washing with sterile water) before extraction. Disinfection did not affect seed germination. Seeds of the other sample were extracted with no previous treatment.

3. Results

3.1. Systemic Infection Systemically infected plants were those that exhibit chlorosis and sporulation of the pathogen in their top leaves including the apex. The results showed a negative correlation (R2 = 0.9653) − between plant age (leaf number) at time of inoculation and systemic infection by the pathogen (Table1). Almost all plants (97.3%) inoculated at the cotyledon stage became systemically infected at 7dpi. A gradual decrease in the proportion of systemically infected plants occurred in older plants. Thus, inoculation at the 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12-leaf stage produced about 96, 88, 70, 62, 32, and 27% systemically infected plants, respectively (Table1). Neither disease symptoms, nor sporulation was seen on the control plants inoculated with water. All plants that were inoculated at the 2–4 leaf stage also showed systemic infection in their cotyledons at 7 dpi. Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 6 of 11

Table 1. The relationships between plant age and systemic spread of Peronospora belbahrii in basil plants. For the method of inoculation, see Figure1.

Plant Age at Time Number of Assessment Number of Systemically % Systemically of Inoculation Inoculated Plants Time Infected Plants Infected Plants Cotyledons 147 7 dpi 143 97.28 2 leaves 156 7 dpi 149 95.51 4 leaves 159 7 dpi 140 88.05 6 leaves 113 10 dpi 79 69.91 8 leaves 117 10 dpi 72 61.54 10 leaves 229 14 dpi 73 31.88 Agronomy 2018, 8,12 x leavesFOR PEER REVIEW 117 14 dpi 31 26.50 6 of 11

3.2. Microscopy3.2. Microscopy MicroscopicMicroscopic examination examination of of free-hand stem stem sections sections revealed revealed the presence the of myceliapresence and haustoriaof mycelia and haustoriaof ofP. belbahriiP. belbahriiin the in systemically the systemically infected plants. infected The myceliumplants. The colonized mycelium the intercellular colonized spaces the of intercellular the vascular parenchyma adjacent to the xylem and the phloem vessels, and produced haustoria inside the spaces ofparenchyma the vascular cells (Figureparenchyma2). adjacent to the xylem and the phloem vessels, and produced haustoria inside the parenchyma cells (Figure 2).

Figure 2.Figure A photomicrograph 2. A photomicrograph showing showing mycelium mycelium with haustoriahaustoria (arrow) (arrow) of P. of belbahrii P. belbahriiinside the inside stem the stem of a systemically infected basil plant. Bar = 50 µm. of a systemically infected basil plant. Bar = 50 µm. 3.3. PCR 3.3. PCR DNA was extracted from the apex, stem, petiole and hypocotyl of eight systemically infected plants, which were inoculated at the of 4-leaf stage. The specific DNA fragment 134bp (3) was detected DNAin allwas four extracted organs of allfrom eight the plants apex, (Figure stem,3). Nopetiole such bandand hypocotyl was detected of in eight the water-inoculated, systemically infected plants, whichhealthy were control inoculated plants. The presenceat the of of P.4-leaf belbahrii stage.in the The apex, specific and surprisingly, DNA fragment in the hypocotyl, 134bp (3) was detectedsuggested in all four that organs the pathogen of al grewl eight systemically plants (Figure in both directions, 3). No such acropetal band and was basipetal. detected We failed in the to water- inoculated,detect healthy the pathogen control in theplants. root of The systemically presence infected of P. plantsbelbahrii by either in the microscopy apex, and orPCR. surprisingly, in the hypocotyl, suggested that the pathogen grew systemically in both directions, acropetal and basipetal. We failed to detect the pathogen in the root of systemically infected plants by either microscopy or PCR.

Figure 3. Detection of P. belbahrii in various organs of systemically infected basil plants that were inoculated at the 4-leaf stage. P1–P4: plant number. M—molecular markers (100–1500 bp). Lanes 1, 2, 3 and 4: PCR amplification products obtained from the apex, stem, petiole and hypocotyl, respectively. PC-positive control, amplification product (134bp) obtained from sporangia of P. belbahrii. NC1-negative control, amplification product obtained from leaves of control healthy basil plants. NC2-negative control-water.

Agronomy 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 11

3.2. Microscopy Microscopic examination of free-hand stem sections revealed the presence of mycelia and haustoria of P. belbahrii in the systemically infected plants. The mycelium colonized the intercellular spaces of the vascular parenchyma adjacent to the xylem and the phloem vessels, and produced haustoria inside the parenchyma cells (Figure 2).

Figure 2. A photomicrograph showing mycelium with haustoria (arrow) of P. belbahrii inside the stem of a systemically infected basil plant. Bar = 50 µm.

3.3. PCR DNA was extracted from the apex, stem, petiole and hypocotyl of eight systemically infected plants, which were inoculated at the of 4-leaf stage. The specific DNA fragment 134bp (3) was detected in all four organs of all eight plants (Figure 3). No such band was detected in the water- inoculated, healthy control plants. The presence of P. belbahrii in the apex, and surprisingly, in the hypocotyl,Agronomy 2019 suggested, 9, 205 that the pathogen grew systemically in both directions, acropetal and basipetal.7 of 11 We failed to detect the pathogen in the root of systemically infected plants by either microscopy or PCR.

FigureFigure 3. 3. DetectionDetection of of P.P. belbahrii belbahrii inin various various organs organs of of systemically systemically infected infected basil basil plants plants that that were were inoculatedinoculated at at the the 4-leaf 4-leaf stage. stage. P1–P4: P1–P4: plant plant number. number. M—molecular M—molecular markers markers (100–1500 (100–1500 bp). bp). Lanes Lanes 1, 2, 1, 32, and 3 and 4: 4:PCR PCR amplification amplification products products obtained obtained from from the the apex, apex, stem, stem, petiole petiole and and hypocotyl, hypocotyl, respectively.respectively. PC-positivePC-positive control,control, amplification amplificatio productn product (134bp) (134bp) obtained obtained from sporangiafrom sporangia of P. belbahrii. of P. belbahrii.NC1-negative NC1-negative control, control, amplification amplification product product obtained ob fromtained leaves from ofleaves control of control healthy healthy basil plants. basil plants.NC2-negative NC2-negative control-water. control-water. Agronomy 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 11 3.4. Axillary Bud Infection 3.4. Axillary Bud Infection Plants that were inoculated at the 4–12 leaf stage and became systemically infected, produced Plants that were inoculated at the 4–12 leaf stage and became systemically infected, produced systemic infection in the axillary buds sprouting either below (Figure4) or above (not shown) the systemic infection in the axillary buds sprouting either below (Figure 4) or above (not shown) the inoculated leaves. Plants that were inoculated at cotyledon or the 2-leaf stage were severely stunted inoculated leaves. Plants that were inoculated at cotyledon or the 2-leaf stage were severely stunted and failedand failed to produce to produce axillary axillary buds. buds.

FigureFigure 4. Symptoms 4. Symptoms of downyof downy mildew mildew in in axillary axillary budsbuds of of a a basil basil plant. plant. 1—Originally 1—Originally inoculated inoculated leaf leaf (the other(the other leaf wasleaf was abscised). abscised). The The red red ring ringindicates indicates the the location location of of the the origin originallyally inoculated inoculated leaves. leaves. 2—An infected axillary bud. 3—Infected apex. 4—Mild symptom on a leaf below the axillary bud. 2—An infected axillary bud. 3—Infected apex. 4—Mild symptom on a leaf below the axillary bud.

3.5. Root3.5. Root Infection Infection Seeds or plants inoculated via the soil failed to produce BDM-symptomatic plants, nor did they Seeds or plants inoculated via the soil failed to produce BDM-symptomatic plants, nor did they exhibit, after disinfection with hypochlorite and washing with sterile water, the 134 bp DNA band of exhibit, after disinfection with hypochlorite and washing with sterile water, the 134 bp DNA band of the pathogen, suggesting that the root system does not serve as an entrance court for the pathogen. the pathogen, suggesting that the root system does not serve as an entrance court for the pathogen. 3.6. Seed Infection and Seed Transmission Systemically infected plants failed to flower, and therefore produced no seeds (Figure 5). Hence, we studied seed infection and seed transmission in plants that grew from contaminated seeds. We harvested such seeds from BDM-infected plants growing in the field during the summer season of 2012–2018 (Table 2, Figure 6). Microscopic observations revealed many sporangia embedded in the mucin secreted by contaminated seeds upon instant imbibition in water. The DNA extracted from such contaminated seeds exhibited PCR amplification products of P. belbahrii (Figure 7). No such amplification products were produced by the DNA extracted from seeds harvested from healthy plants (Figure 7). Disinfection of contaminated seeds with 3% hypochlorite solution followed by washing with sterile water removed the sporangia attached to the contaminated seeds. The DNA extracted from such disinfected seeds exhibited no PCR amplification products of P. belbahrii. Contaminated seeds (not disinfected) were sown in pasteurized soil and grown for about 4 weeks in growth chambers until the 4-6 leaf stage in an environment conducive for colonization but not for infection or sporulation of P. belbahrii (1). Mean germination rate of these seeds exceeded 90%. None of the 900 contaminated seeds sown in 2012 produced plants with symptoms of BDM nor did these plants showed sporulation of P. belbahrii upon incubation in a dew chamber at 20 °C (Table 3). Similar results were obtained with 4700, 9400, 4300, and 2500 seeds sown in 2016, 2017, 2017 (sown with floral parts attached), and 2018, respectively (Table 3). From the 21,800 contaminated seeds sown, 19,620 plants developed. No plant show symptoms of BDM or sporulation of P. belbahrii (Table

Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 8 of 11

3.6. Seed Infection and Seed Transmission

AgronomySystemically 2018, 8, x FOR infected PEER REVIEW plants failed to flower, and therefore produced no seeds (Figure5). Hence,8 of 11 we studied seed infection and seed transmission in plants that grew from contaminated seeds. Agronomy 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 11 Weband harvested specific suchto the seeds pathogen from BDM-infected (Table 3), suggesting plants growing that seed in the transmission field during theof P. summer belbahrii season, either of symptomatic2012–2018band specific (Table or latent,to2, Figurethe doespathogen6). not occur(Table in 3) basil, suggesting under Israeli that seedconditions. transmission of P. belbahrii, either symptomatic or latent, does not occur in basil under Israeli conditions. Table 2. The origin of basil seeds used in this study.

ExperimentExperiment Year Cultivar CultivarTable 2. The Supplier Supplierorigin of basil seeds Production Production used in this study. Harvest Harvest Isolate Isolate Calyx Calyx

Experiment11 2012Year Cultivar Peri Peri Volcani Volcani Supplier center center Petah Petah Production Tikva,Tikva, ILIL Harvest healthy healthy Isolate Calyx 22 1 2012 2012 Peri Peri Peri Volcani Volcani Volcani center centercenter Petah Petah Tikva, Tikva, IL ILIL healthy infected infected Unknown Unknown removed removed 33 2 2016 2012 Sweet Sweet Peri Basil Basil Volcani Genesis Genesis center Bar Petah Ilan University, Tikva, IL ILIL infectedinfected infected Unknown Knafo Knafo 33 removed removed removed

44 3 2016 2016 Sweet Peri Peri Basil Volcani Volcani Genesis center center Bar NeweIlan Newe University, Yaar, ILIL IL infected healthy healthy Knafo 3 removed

55 4 2016 2016 Sweet Sweet Peri Basil Basil Volcani Genesis Genesis center Newe Ashalim, Ashalim, Yaar, ILIL IL healthy healthy healthy 66 5 2017 2016 Sweet Sweet Sweet Basil BasilBasil Genesis Genesis Genesis Bar Ilan Ashalim, University, IL ILIL healthyinfected infected Knafo Knafo 33 removed removed 77 6 2017 2017 Sweet Sweet Sweet Basil BasilBasil Genesis Genesis Genesis Bar Bar Ilan University, University, IL ILIL infectedinfected infected Knafo Knafo Knafo 3 33 removed attached attached 88 7 2017 2017 Sweet Peri Peri Basil Volcani Volcani Genesis center center Bar NeweIlan Newe University, Yaar, ILIL IL infected healthy healthy Knafo 3 attached 99 8 2017 2017 Sweet Sweet Peri Basil Basil Volcani Genesis Genesis center Newe Ashalim, Ashalim, Yaar, ILIL IL healthy healthy healthy

1010 9 2017 2017 Genoveser Genoveser Sweet Basil Ball Ball GenesisStraathof Straathof South South Ashalim, AfricaAfrica IL healthy healthy healthy

1111 10 2018 2017 FiveFive Genoveser cultivars cultivars * * Ball GenesisGenesis Straathof SouthAshalim, Ashalim, Africa ILIL healthy infected infected M M removed removed 11 2018 Five cultivars * Genesis Ashalim, IL infected M removed * Emily* Emily 42, 42, Emily Emily 47, 47, Emily Emily 201,201, Edwina Edwina 5 and5 and 1241. 1241. * Emily 42, Emily 47, Emily 201, Edwina 5 and 1241.

FigureFigure 5. 5.The The effect eff effectect of of systemic systemic infectioninfection infection with withwith P. P.P. belbahrii belbahriion onon growth growthgrowth ofof of basilbasil basil plants. plants. A ( AA—Systemically)—Systemically—Systemically infectedinfected plantsplants plants that that that were were were inoculated inoculated inoculated at the atat 4-leaf thethe stage4-leaf4-leaf remained stage remainedremained stunted. stunted. (Bstunted.)—Healthy, B B—Healthy,—Healthy, water-inoculated water- water- inoculatedcontrolinoculated plants. control control (C)—Sporulation plants. plants. C C—Sporulation—Sporulation of P. belbahrii ofof P.P. onbelbahriibelbahrii the lower on thethe leaf lowerlower surfaces leaf leaf surfaces surfaces of top of leaves of top top leaves takenleaves taken from taken a fromsystemicallyfrom a systemically a systemically infected infected plantinfected shown plant plant shown inshown (A). Theinin AA. photos. TheThe photos were werewere taken taken taken at two at at two weeks two weeks weeks after after inoculation.after inoculation. inoculation.

(A) (B) (A) (B) FigureFigure 6. 6.The The appearance appearance of of downy downy mildewmildew in floweringflowering ba basilsil plants plants in in the the field. field. Seeds Seeds were were harvested harvested Figurefromfrom such 6. such The plants plants appearance to to examine examine of downy seed seed infection infectionmildew andin and flowering transmission transmission basil of plants P. of belbahrii.P. in belbahrii the A field.—A.(A flowering Seeds)—A were flowering basil harvested plant basil plantfrominfected such infected plantswith with downy to downyexamine mildew. mildew. seed B infection—A (B )—Aclose-up and close-up transmissionphoto photo of the of ofapex, the P. belbahrii. apex, showing showing A heavy—A heavyflowering sporulation sporulation basil of plant P. of P.infected belbahrii.belbahrii. with downy mildew. B—A close-up photo of the apex, showing heavy sporulation of P. belbahrii.

Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 9 of 11

Microscopic observations revealed many sporangia embedded in the mucin secreted by contaminated seeds upon instant imbibition in water. The DNA extracted from such contaminated seeds exhibited PCR amplification products of P. belbahrii (Figure7). No such amplification products were produced by the DNA extracted from seeds harvested from healthy plants (Figure7). Disinfection of contaminated seeds with 3% hypochlorite solution followed by washing with sterile water removed the sporangia attached to the contaminated seeds. The DNA extracted from such disinfected seeds exhibited no PCR amplification products of P. belbahrii. Agronomy 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 11

FigureFigure 7. Detection 7. Detection of P. of belbahrii P. belbahriiin in contaminated contaminated basil basil seeds. seeds. M—Molecular M—Molecular markers markers (100–1500 (100–1500 bp). bp). Lanes 1–8:Lanes PCR1–8: PCR amplification amplification products products obtainedobtained fr from:om: Lane Lane 1—Seeds 1—Seeds from fromhealthy healthy plants (Peri) plants (Peri) harvested in 2012. Lane 2—Seeds from infected plants (Peri) harvested in 2012. Lane 3—Seeds from harvested in 2012. Lane 2—Seeds from infected plants (Peri) harvested in 2012. Lane 3—Seeds from infected plants (Sweet Basil) harvested in 2016. Lane 4—Seeds from infected plants (Sweet Basil) infectedharvested plants in (Sweet 2017. Lane Basil) 5—Seeds harvested from healthy in 2016. plants Lane (Sweet 4—Seeds Basil) harvested from infected in 2016. plantsLane 6- Seeds (Sweet Basil) harvestedfrom in healthy 2017. plants Lane 5—Seeds(Sweet Basil) from harvested healthy in plants2017. Lane (Sweet 7—Positive Basil) harvested control, PCR in 2016.amplification Lane 6- Seeds from healthyproduct plants(134 bp, (Sweetarrow) obtained Basil) harvestedfrom sporangia in 2017.of P. belbahrii. Lane 7—PositiveNC—negative control,control, water. PCR amplification product (134 bp, arrow) obtained from sporangia of P. belbahrii. NC—negative control, water. Table 3. Seed transmission of downy mildew caused by Peronospora belbahrii in basil plants.

Contaminated seeds (not disinfected)Disease were Transmission sown in pasteurized Plants soil Assayed and grown by PCR for about 4 weeks Experiment Year in growth chambers until the 4-6Seeds leaf stageSown in an Infected environment Plants conducive Total * for PCR colonization Positive but not for infection or sporulation1 of 2012P. belbahrii 1000(1). Mean germination 0 rate of these50 seeds exceeded 0 90%. None of the 900 contaminated2 seeds2012 sown in 2012900 produced plants 0 with symptoms 50 of BDM 0 nor did these plants 3 2016 4700 0 150 0 showed sporulation of P. belbahrii upon incubation in a dew chamber at 20 ◦C (Table3). Similar results 4 2016 1000 0 50 0 were obtained with5 4700, 9400,2016 4300,1000 and 2500 seeds 0sown in 2016, 50 2017, 2017 (sown 0 with floral parts attached), and 2018,6 respectively2017 (Table94003 ). From the 0 21,800 contaminated 220 seeds 0 sown, 19,620 plants developed. No plant7 show2017 symptoms 4300 of BDM or sporulation 0 of 150P. belbahrii (Table 0 3). Furthermore, none of the plant8 samples 2017 assayed with1000 PCR at the 4–6 0 leaf stage showed50 the DNA 0 band specific to the pathogen (Table9 3), suggesting2017 that1000 seed transmission 0 of P. belbahrii 50 , either symptomatic 0 or latent, 10 2017 900 0 20 0 does not occur in basil under Israeli conditions. 11 2018 500/cultivar 0 50/cultivar 0 Table 3. Seed transmission of downy* Ten mildew plants per caused sample. by Peronospora belbahrii in basil plants.

4. Discussion Disease Transmission Plants Assayed by PCR Experiment Year The major purposes of the presentSeeds study Sown were Infected to examine Plants the ability Total of downy * mildew PCR Positive pathogen Peronospora1 belbahrii to: 2012(i) Spread systemically 1000 in basil 0 plants, (ii) reach 50 the seeds, and 0 (iii) be transferred 2by seeds. With 2012 some downy 900 mildews, systemically 0 infected plants 50 may produce 0 infected seeds [8,15].3 Seed infection 2016 may also occur 4700 in plants showing 0 latent infection 150 [15]. Pseudoperonopora 0 cubensis, the4 downy mildew 2016 agent of cucurbits, 1000 is seed transmitted 0 without 50 being systemic 0 [16]. Its court of entrance5 is the pistil. 2016 Specific 1000PCR primers and microscopy 0 revealed 50 its presence 0 inside the embryo. A low6 proportion 2017 of the infected 9400 seeds produced 0 infected plants 220 [16]. 0 7 2017 4300 0 150 0 Systemic infection with BDM was rarely seen in the field [1]. Here, we show that systemic 8 2017 1000 0 50 0 infection can9 be readily 2017 produced in 1000 artificially inoculated 0 basil plants 50 under growth 0 chamber conditions.10 When P. belbahrii 2017 was inoculated 900 on a pair of 0 young leaves 20of 2 or 12-leaf basil 0 plants about 97% 11and 27% of the 2018 inoculated 500 plants/cultivar became systemically 0 infected 50/cultivar within 7 and 14 0 days after inoculation, respectively. Microscopic observations* Ten plants per made sample. with such plants detected the mycelium in the vascular parenchyma of the stem. PCR assays confirmed its growth from the inoculated leaf lamina to the petiole and then to the stem. In the stem, the mycelium could grow acropetally to the apex, basipetally to the cotyledons and hypocotyl below the inoculated leaves, and laterally to the axillary buds. Unlike Plasmopara halstedii in sunflower, P. belbahrii never reached the roots.

Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 10 of 11

4. Discussion The major purposes of the present study were to examine the ability of downy mildew pathogen Peronospora belbahrii to: (i) Spread systemically in basil plants, (ii) reach the seeds, and (iii) be transferred by seeds. With some downy mildews, systemically infected plants may produce infected seeds [8,15]. Seed infection may also occur in plants showing latent infection [15]. Pseudoperonopora cubensis, the downy mildew agent of cucurbits, is seed transmitted without being systemic [16]. Its court of entrance is the pistil. Specific PCR primers and microscopy revealed its presence inside the embryo. A low proportion of the infected seeds produced infected plants [16]. Systemic infection with BDM was rarely seen in the field [1]. Here, we show that systemic infection can be readily produced in artificially inoculated basil plants under growth chamber conditions. When P. belbahrii was inoculated on a pair of young leaves of 2 or 12-leaf basil plants about 97% and 27% of the inoculated plants became systemically infected within 7 and 14 days after inoculation, respectively. Microscopic observations made with such plants detected the mycelium in the vascular parenchyma of the stem. PCR assays confirmed its growth from the inoculated leaf lamina to the petiole and then to the stem. In the stem, the mycelium could grow acropetally to the apex, basipetally to the cotyledons and hypocotyl below the inoculated leaves, and laterally to the axillary buds. Unlike Plasmopara halstedii in sunflower, P. belbahrii never reached the roots. P. belbahrii can develop systemic infection in young basil plants. Systemically infected plants remained stunted (probably due to hormonal imbalance) [22]) and produced no seeds. Hence, no seed transmission could be studied with such plants. To study seed transmission, we used seeds of heavily infected plants growing in the field in various locations of the country. We found neither molecular nor phenotypic evidence for the occurrence of P. belbahrii in such seeds. The DNA that was extracted from such contaminated seeds exhibited the 134bp fragment of P. belbahrii. This was confirmed by microscopic examinations, which revealed sporangia embedded in the surface of such seeds. However, the likelihood that sporangia on seed surface retain viability is null due to the very low survivability of detached sporangia [21]. Of thousands of contaminated seeds (including seeds that were externally- contaminated with fresh sporangia of P.belbahrii) that were sown in pasteurized soil in growth chambers, all developed healthy plants. Furthermore, the DNA extracted from hundreds such plants proved no latent infection with P. belbahrii. These results corroborate with Wyenandt et al. [13] who showed by rqPCR the occurrence of P. belbahrii on seeds that were collected from infected basil plants in the field. The data we present here do not corroborate with previous studies from Europe [6,7] that claimed seed transmission of P. belbahrii in basil. Our study showed that seed transmission does not occur under the dry summer conditions of Israel. It is logical to assume that seed infection/transmission may happen in Europe and other locations where conditions are wetter during summer. Exposure of basil plants to prolonged wetness periods at time of flowering and seed production may facilitate seed infection. Taken together, this study proves that P. belbahrii can spread systemically in basil plants. Systemically infected plants fail to produce seeds. Seeds collected from heavily infected plants in Israeli fields exhibit the pathogen on their surface, but never produced BDM-infected plants.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, Y.C., L.F.-B., Y.B.-N.; Methodology, Y.C., L.F.-B., Y.B.-N.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, Y.C.; Project Administration, Y.C. Funding: This research was funded by BARD, Project US-4947-16 R. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Cohen, Y.; Ben Naim, Y.; Falach, L.; Rubin, A.E. Epidemiology of basil downy mildew. Phytopathology 2017, 107, 1149–1160. [CrossRef][PubMed] 2. Hansford, C.G. Annual report of the mycologist. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 1933, 12, 421–422. Agronomy 2019, 9, 205 11 of 11

3. Belbahri, L.; Calmin, G.; Pawlowski, J.; Lefort, F. Phylogenetic analysis and real time PCR detection of a presumbably undescribed Peronospora species on sweet basil and sage. Mycol. Res. 2005, 109, 1276–1287. [CrossRef][PubMed] 4. Roberts, P.D.; Raid, R.N.; Harmon, P.F.; Jordan, S.A.; Palmateer, A.J. First report of downy mildew caused by a Peronospora sp on basil in Florida and the United States. Plant Dis. 2009, 93, 199. [CrossRef][PubMed] 5. Cohen, Y.; Vaknin, M.; Ben-Naim, Y.; Rubin, A.E.; Galperin, M.; Silverman, D.; Bitton, S.; Adler, U. First report of the occurrence and resistance to mefenoxam of Peronospora belbahrii, causal agent of downy mildew of basil (Ocimum basilicum) in Israel. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 692. [CrossRef][PubMed] 6. Garibaldi, A.; Minuto, G.; Bertetti, D.; Gullino, M.L. Seed transmission of Peronospora sp. of basil. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2004, 111, 465–469. 7. Farahani-Kofoet, R.D.; Roemer, P.; Grosch, R. Systemic spread of downy mildew in basil plants and detection of the pathogen in seed and plant samples. Mycol. Progress 2012, 11, 961–966. [CrossRef] 8. Cohen, Y.; Sackston, W.E. Factors affecting infection of sunflowers by Plasmopara halstedii. Can. J. Bot. 1973, 51, 15–22. [CrossRef] 9. Subbarao, C.S.; Anchieta, A.; Ochoa, L.; Dhar, N.; Kunjeti, S.G.; Subbarao, K.; Klosterman, S.J. Detection of latent infections of Peronospora effusa in spinach. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1766–1771. [CrossRef][PubMed] 10. Wyenandt, C.A.; Simon, J.E.; Pyne, R.M.; Homa, K.; McGrath, M.T.; Zhang, S.A.; Raid, R.N.; Ma, L.J.; Wick, R.; Guo, L.; et al. Basil downy mildew (Peronospora belbahrii): Discoveries and challenges relative to its control. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 885–894. [CrossRef] 11. Gilardi, G.; Pintore, I.; Demarchi, S.; Gullino, M.L.; Garibaldi, A. Seed dressing to control downy mildew of basil. Phytoparasitica 2015, 43, 531–539. [CrossRef] 12. Pintore, I.; Gilardi, G.; Gullino, M.L.; Garibaldi, A. Detection of mefenoxam-resistant strains of Peronospora belbahrii, the causal agent of basil downy mildew, transmitted through infected seeds. Phytoparasitica 2016, 44, 563–569. [CrossRef] 13. Wyenandt, C.A.; Maimone, L.R.; Homa, K.; Madeiras, A.M.; Wick, R.L.; Simon, J.E. Detection of the downy mildew pathogen on seed of basil following field infection in Southern New Jersey. Horttechnology 2018, 28, 637–641. [CrossRef] 14. Spenser, D.M.E. The Downy Mildews; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1981. 15. Cohen, Y.; Sackston, W.E. Seed infection and latent infection of sunflowers by Plasmopara halstedii. Can. J. Bot. 1974, 52, 231–238. [CrossRef] 16. Cohen, Y.; Rubin, A.E.; Galperin, M.; Ploch, S.; Runge, F.; Thines, M. Seed transmission of Pseudoperonospora cubensis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109766. [CrossRef][PubMed] 17. Ben-Naim, Y.; Falach, L.; Cohen, Y. Transfer of downy mildew resistance from wild basil (Ocimum americanum) to sweet basil (O. basilicum). Phytopathology 2018, 108, 114–123. [CrossRef][PubMed] 18. Ben-Naim, Y.; Falach, L.; Cohen, Y. Resistance against basil downy mildew in Ocimum species. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 778–785. [CrossRef][PubMed] 19. Cohen, Y.; Eyal, H.; Hanania, J. Ultrastructure, autofluorescence, callose deposition and lignification in susceptible and resistant muskmelon leaves infected with the powdery mildew fungus Sphaerotheca fuliginea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1990, 36, 191–204. [CrossRef] 20. Doyle, J.J. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. 21. Cohen, Y.; Rubin, A.E. Daytime solar heating controls downy mildew Peronospora belbahrii in sweet basil. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126103. [CrossRef] 22. Cohen, Y.; Sackston, W.E. Disappearance of IAA in presence of tissues of sunflowers infected by Plasmopara halstedii. Can. J. Bot. 1974, 52, 861–866. [CrossRef]

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).