Parkdale Community Planning Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parkdale Community Planning Study Parkdale Community Full Report Economic Development (PCED) 2016 Planning Project Parkdale Community Planning Study Building a foundation for decent work, shared wealth, and equitable development in Parkdale Table of Contents Acknowledgements 02 1 Introduction 04 1–1 Why community planning in Parkdale now? 05 1–2 Four overarching Parkdale values that guide community plan- 05 ning and action 1–3 The purpose and organization of the study report 06 2 Why Community Economic Development? 07 3 Participatory Planning Process and Research Methods 10 3–1 PCED steering committee 10 3–2 Three rounds of participatory planning workshops 11 3–3 Research methods 12 4 Parkdale in Relation to Toronto and Beyond 14 5 Parkdale Neighbourhood Wellbeing Indicators 21 6 Seven Key Areas for Community Action and Policy Option 24 6–1 Social infrastructure 25 6–2 Affordable housing and land use 30 6–3 Decent work and inclusive economic opportunities 35 6–4 Food security 44 6–5 Community financing 46 6–6 Local participatory democracy 48 6–7 Cultural development 51 7 Directions for Decent Work, Shared Wealth, 52 and Equitable Development 8 Moving Forward 88 9 References 90 Acknowledgements 2 We wish to thank a number of people and organizations for supporting the Parkdale Community Economic Development Planning project. Firstly, great thanks go to the Atkinson Foundation for making this project possible through leadership, inspiration, and financial support. Special thanks also go to all community members, agency staff and community leaders who took the time to participate in interviews, surveys, focus groups and participatory planning workshops. The PCED project has been supported by existing collaborative initiatives funded by the Metcalf Foundation, the Ontario Trillium Foundation, the Echo Foundation, and the Catharine Donnelly Foundation. We are also grateful to Richard Maaranen from the University of Toronto’s Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership (NCRP) project and Heath Priston from the City of Toronto’s Social Development Finance and Administration for providing data for the project. Acknowledgements 3 The PCED Steering Committee Members Project Contributors and Advisors Anna Bartula (Parkdale Village BIA) Catalyst Centre Alexander Gopen (York FES Student Intern) Daniel Liadsky (Consultant) Ayal Dinner (Greenest City) Greg Sutter (Wellesley Institute) Bob Rose (PARC) Matthew Adams (Consultant) Cassandra Wong Sally Miller (Consultant) (Parkdale Community Information Centre) PNLT Board & Research Committee Dennis Long (Breakaway Addiction Services) Flordeliz Dandal (Kababayan Multicultural Centre) Interpreter Ibrahim Absiye (CultureLink) Sonam Wangmo Jason Mckinney (Jeremiah Community) Joshua Barndt (Parkdale Neighbourhood Land Trust) Report Reviewers Joshua Walters (Jeremiah Community) Emily Paradis (University of Toronto, NCRP) Joyce Brown (Working for Change) Joshua Bardnt (PNLT) Julia Barnett (Parkdale Community Health Centre) Joyce Brown (Working for Change) Karen Prosper (Arrabon House) Leslie McDonald (Habitat Services) Kate Declerck (Parkdale Project Read) Maureen Fair (West Neighbourhood House) Lisa King (Toronto Public Health) Victor Willis (PARC) Leslie McDonald (Habitat Services) Maureen Fair (West Neighbourhood House) Report Editors Michael Burtt (Making Room) Aviva Coopersmith Mike Creek (Working for Change) Brendan Ouellette Miranda Huska (Toronto Public Library) James MacNevin Nancy Henderson (Parkdale Community Legal Services) Nancy Henderson (Parkdale Community Legal Services) Nancy Steckley (Parkdale Community Health Centre) Noel Simpson (Regeneration Community Services) Designer Paolo Staffieri (City of Toronto) Joshua Barndt Pat Baranek (Centre for Mindfulness Studies) JP King Patricia O’Connell (Sistering) Kyosuke Nishida Paul Bruce (COTA) Natsumi Saito Rick Eagan (West Neighbourhood House) Sarosh Anwar (City of Toronto) Report Author Shirley Roberts (Parkdale Community Health Centre) Kuni Kamizaki (PARC, PNLT) Stan Chase (Parkdale Project Read) Susanna Redekop (West End Food Coop) To learn more about this report or to get involved contact: Tita Ang-angco (Centre for Mindfulness Studies) Kuni Kamizaki (Report Author | Lead Planner) Tsering N Thonsur (Parkdale Intercultural Association) [email protected] Veronica Feihl (Roncesvalles Village BIA) Victor Willis (PARC) Walter Rojenko (St. Joseph’s Health Centre) Student Interns and Community Volunteers Alexander Gopen Andrew Winchur Francis Yoo Julia Bahen Lynn Sky Katie Plaizier Mercedes Sharpe Zayas Monica Da Ponte Myia Daver Introduction 4 01 Introduction The Parkdale Community Economic Development (PCED) Planning Project is an 18-month neighbourhood- wide planning initiative for Parkdale. Supported by the Atkinson Foundation, the PCED project is led by Parkdale Activity-Recreation Centre (PARC), with extensive collaboration among over 25 organizations working in Parkdale. The project combines community action research, stakeholder engagement, and participatory planning to develop future visions of Parkdale, and community strategies to realize them. The project goal is to create a Parkdale Neighbourhood Plan for decent work, shared wealth building, and equitable development. Introduction 5 1–1 Why community planning in Parkdale now? public infrastructure by the federal government is another opening. In addition to these political opportunities, there is Parkdale is changing rapidly. This comes as little surprise to a growing movement in alternative approaches to community those living and working in Parkdale. Neighbourhood economic development (CED) in and beyond Toronto. The change is not new to Parkdale. Indeed, Parkdale has been growing socio-spatial inequality, precarious work, and under constant pressure of neighbourhood change – from the displacement are imperatives to rethink the local economy. Gardiner Expressway construction in the 1960s, to There is a pressing need to explore ways to promote shared deinstitutionalization in the 1970s, to the influx of artists wealth, decent work, and equitable development. This emerging and higher-income residents starting in the 1990s (Slater CED movement encourages us not only to respond to 2004a). And yet, for the past decade, the pace and degree of neighbourhood change, but also to proactively build more gentrification has intensified. For example, Parkdale’s main equitable local economies. Taken together, the PCED project commercial street, Queen Street West, has seen a growing furnishes timely opportunities for participatory planning and number of new restaurants and bars that cater to outside and community engagement to envision the future of Parkdale high-end clientele, pushing out local-serving businesses. that we want to create together. Pressures on the affordability of high-rise rental apartments in South Parkdale have increased rapidly after corporate 1–2 Four overarching Parkdale values that guide landlords started to raise rents higher than provincial rent community planning and action guidelines, resulting in intense eviction pressures. These are only two examples that aptly demonstrate the rapid changes The PCED project has been informed by four core and displacement pressures underway in Parkdale. neighbourhood values that emerged from the community Increasing pressures from gentrification and real estate planning process: diversity, affordability, inclusion, and reinvestment have endangered local community assets, equity (see p. 10 for more details on the planning process). assets that have kept Parkdale diverse, affordable, and Firstly, Parkdale is a socially, culturally, and economically accessible to diverse community members, particularly for diverse neighbourhood. This diversity attracts a wide range low-income and marginalized community members. of community members who choose to live, stay, and socialize in Parkdale. The second value is affordability, What is at stake now is the future of Parkdale. The effects which makes it possible for diverse community members – of neighbourhood change are a shared concern. We know regardless of different socio-economic and cultural that change happens, but we also know that how change backgrounds – to call Parkdale their home. This combination happens is not inevitable. Strategies and policy tools to of diversity and affordability creates a neighbourhood guide neighbourhood change and local economies do exist. condition for the third value, inclusion. The fourth value – In fact, Parkdale is already building those strategies, such although more implicit in our planning process – is equity. as the Parkdale Neighbourhood Land Trust, Toronto’s first Equity is an important lens when we think of a question of community land trust that aims to acquire and hold land “differences” in Parkdale. for community benefits, or the Co-op Cred program that offers decent supportive work opportunities. A unique and Our community needs and assets mapping process remarkable strength of Parkdale lies in the diversity of the demonstrated diverse community members have an unequal neighbourhood’s community-led initiatives. What is needed, access to and a varying degree of dependence on community then, is to explore how we can align those strategies and work assets. For example, community assets for one community together to address growing inequality and poverty, and group – a range of fresh food options in Parkdale – are not build a more equitable neighbourhood. This is why this accessible for other community groups. For some, a local community planning initiative is vital now to building
Recommended publications
  • A Profile of an East Hamilton Neighbourhood: the Foundation for Service Planning
    A Profile of an East Hamilton Neighbourhood: The Foundation for Service Planning September 2007 Prepared by: Mark Fraser, M.S.W. Senior Social Planner 162 King William Street, Suite 103, Hamilton, Ontario L8R 3N9 Tel: (905)522 1148 Fax: (905)522-9124 Email: [email protected] Website: www.sprc.hamilton.on.ca A United Way Agency TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... i AGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION .......................................................... 4 LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS ............................................................................ 6 CONNECTION TO THE LABOUR MARKET ............................................................ 8 PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ........................................................................... 9 IMMIGRANT AND VISIBLE MINORITY POPULATION ............................................... 10 LEVEL OF EDUCATION ..................................................................................... 11 COMMUNITY SUPPORTS AND SERVICES............................................................ 12 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………..13 APPENDIX A: PROGRAMS AND SERVICES CURRENTLY OPERATING IN THE MISSION SERVICES TARGET AREA ................................................................................ 14 INTRODUCTION The Social Planning and Research Council of Hamilton (SPRC) is a non-profit, registered charitable organization governed by a community-based Board of Directors. Our goal is to
    [Show full text]
  • Program Brochure Fall & Winter 2020 - 2021
    CITY OF CHARLOTTETOWN PARKS anD RECREATION DEPARTMENT Program Brochure Fall & Winter 2020 - 2021 www.charlOttetOwn .ca GREETINGS FROM MAYOR PHILIP BROWN Another season is soon to end and we will now enter into a whole new program of activities to keep you active during the Fall and Winter months. The City’s mission statement challenges City Council to deliver services to all citizens, enhancing the quality of life for all. The Parks and Recreation Department strives to operate and maintain a variety of programs both educational and recreational all year long, for all ages. The goal of this guide is to update residents on recreation and leisure opportunities offered by the City of Charlottetown and provides important information on community groups, local events and services offered throughout the City. Members of City Council believe that being involved with the community makes for a more active lifestyle and higher quality of life for individuals and helps us all to build a stronger community. No matter what the remainder of the year brings during these uncertain times, I encourage you to stay active, register for programs, and enjoy a healthy lifestyle. Stay safe and stay healthy! Sincerely yours, Mayor Philip Brown [email protected] PhilipBrownPEI CharlottetownMayor PhilipBrownPEI Front Cover Photograph by Brian McInnis MESSAGE FROM THE PARKS, RECREATION AND LEISURE ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE The Parks, Recreation and Leisure Activities Committee is pleased to present the 2020 / 2021 edition of our Fall and Winter program brochure. The Parks and Recreation Department consists of a management team that oversees direct delivery programs, facility operations and park management of approximately 400 acres of parkland and green space.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Site and Area Specific Official Plan Policies 9, 21, 22, 265, 305 For
    CHAPTER 7 SITE AND AREA SPECIFIC OFFICIAL PLAN POLICIES 9, 21, 22, 265, 305 FOR THE COMMUNITY OF NEW TORONTO Policy 9. Lake Shore Boulevard West, South of Birmingham Street, East of Fourteenth Street, and West of Ninth Street a) A mix of residential, commercial, light industrial and park uses are permitted. A variety of housing forms will be provided, with retail space and office uses integrated into residential development along Lake Shore Boulevard West. b) Alternative parkland dedication for residential development will be a minimum of 0.5 hectares per 300 units. Parkland dedication may consist of both land dedication and cash payment as well as other considerations. Policy 21. Lake Shore Boulevard Between Etobicoke Creek and Dwight Avenue a) Buildings should be built to the Lake Shore Boulevard West street line with a discretionary setback zone of 1.5 metres. Development blocks should provide a continuous building face for at least 70 per cent of the frontage on Lake Shore Boulevard West. Building heights should not exceed four storeys, except: 1 i) between Twenty Second Street and Twenty Third Street, where a six storey building is permitted if the extra height is stepped back from the street; and ii) for the area between Twenty Third Street and 3829 Lake Shore Boulevard West (one block west of Fortieth Street), where a six storey building is permitted; however, in areas where lot depths exceed 35 metres, higher building height may be considered. Building height should not exceed a 45-degree angular plane from the property line of the adjacent low-scale residential properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report
    Acknowledgments The site of Exhibition Place has had a long tradition as a gathering place. Given its location on the water, these lands would have attracted Indigenous populations before recorded history. We acknowledge that the land occupied by Exhibition Place is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Figure 1. Moccasin Identifier engraving at Toronto Trillium Park The study team would like to thank City Planning Division Study Team Exhibition Place Lynda Macdonald, Director Don Boyle, Chief Executive Officer Nasim Adab Gilles Bouchard Tamara Anson-Cartwright Catherine de Nobriga Juliana Azem Ribeiro de Almeida Mark Goss Bryan Bowen Hardat Persaud David Brutto Tony Porter Brent Fairbairn Laura Purdy Christian Giles Debbie Sanderson Kevin Lee Kelvin Seow Liz McFarland Svetlana Lavrentieva Board of Governors Melanie Melnyk Tenants, Clients and Operators Dan Nicholson James Parakh David Stonehouse Brad Sunderland Nigel Tahair Alison Torrie-Lapaire 4 - PHASE 1 PROPOSALS REPORT FOR EXHIBITION PLACE Local Advisory Committee Technical Advisory Committee Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Association Michelle Berquist - Transportation Planning The Bentway Swinzle Chauhan – Transportation Services
    [Show full text]
  • 171 EAST LIBERTY STREET Toronto, on Highlights
    Retail For Lease 171 EAST LIBERTY STREET Toronto, ON Highlights • Renovated mixed-use campus in the heart of Liberty Village Property Summary • Total complex comprised of over 295,000 SF of office and retail space • Ceiling heights of 15 Ft Set in the heart of one of Toronto’s fastest-growing • Tenants include LOCAL Public Eatery, BMO, Tim Hortons, Home neighbourhoods, The Liberty Market Building offers Hardware, Brazen Head, and Bulk Barn retail tenants the opportunity to capitalize on a steady • Excellent TTC and GO Station access stream of both local and visiting clientele. This location • Parking: provides an ideal opportunity for retailers, with the • Sister building, Liberty Market Lofts, provides below grade neighbourhood’s local demographic of young urban commercial parking professionals and the building’s close proximity to • Green ‘P’ surface parking immediately west of the property downtown. With more than 100,000 SF of main level retail space, The Liberty Market Building, a neighbourhood landmark, provides a unique retail mix. Featuring prominent exposure, beautiful character space, and over 50 office tenants, The Liberty Market Building offers a one-of-a-kind venue. Details UNIT 111 970 SF UNIT 122 3,655 SF UNIT 137 3,720 SF (Divisible) AVAILABLE Immediate TERM 5 - 10 Years NET RENT Negotiable ADDITIONAL RENT $19.18 PSF (EST. 2019) Site Map Retail Map QWT UNIT 100 LOCAL Public Eatery UNIT 116 Salon Tocci UNIT 127B Pizzaville 1 Subway Sandwich KING HIGHLINE UNIT 101 Condo Store UNIT 117 For the Love of Cake UNIT 130 COTY 2 Vogue Supper Club NEW RETAIL UNDER DEVELOPMENT APPROX.
    [Show full text]
  • Parkdale Community Benefits Framework Guide for Development Without Displacement
    Parkdale People's Economy Full Report Parkdale Community Economy November 2018 Development (PCED) Planning Project Parkdale Community Benefits Framework Guide for Development without Displacement Equitable targets for policymakers, political representatives, developers, investors, and community advocates. Version 1 Table of Contents 2 Acknowledgments 3 1. Introduction 6 1.1. What's in it for Parkdale? 6 1.2. What is the Purpose of this Framework? 8 1.3. What are Community Benefits? 8 1.4. What is Our Vision? 9 1.5. How was this Framework Created? 10 1.6. What is the Parkdale People's Economy? 12 1.7. How to Use this Framework? 12 2. Community Benefits Demands: Summary 15 2.1. Community Benefits Demands and Targets 15 3. Equitable Process 20 3.1. Accessible Consultations 21 3.2. Equity Impact Assessment 21 3.3. Community Planning Board 22 3.4. Community Benefits Agreements 22 4. Affordable Housing 24 4.1. Building Shared Language 25 4.2. Affordable Housing Targets 26 4.3. Adequacy and Accessibility 30 4.4. How to Achieve Targets: Community 31 4.5. How to Achieve Targets: Policy 31 5. Affordable Commercial 34 5.1. Affordable Commercial Targets 35 5.2. How to Achieve Targets: Policy 36 5.3. How to Achieve Targets: Community 38 6. Decent Work 40 6.1. Construction, Renovation, and Retrofit 41 6.2. Housing Operations 42 6.3. Business Operations 42 6.4. Wraparound Supports 43 6.5. Mandating Social Procurement 44 6.6. Employment and Industrial Lands 44 6.7. Promoting a Cultural Shift around Decent Work 44 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Downsview Growth Districts + Bombardier Lands
    5 Downsview Growth Districts + Former Bombardier Lands The Canada Lands Company and City of Toronto are The Keeley planning for 42 thousand new jobs and residents within these five new districts surrounding Downsview Park. On top of that is the redevelopment potential for the Downsview Airport seen here in Yellow (the former Bombardier Lands). The Future Of The Downsview Area The current approved plan has 42,000 new jobs and residents as part of the 5 new districts These will consist of mid-rise buildings, green and public space This is with the airport height restriction This is without the development of the Bombardier Lands Create T.O. is one of the main land owners. They’re part of the City of Toronto and their mandate is to get highest and best value out of land sales for the benefit of the City Canada Lands Company is a property manager, stewarding the development of the lands to fund the further development of the park Land sales proceeds go to the City of Toronto and to the further development of the park Downsview Lands Site Plan The Keeley The 9 Acre Pond – “The Lake” The Stanley Greene District The Keeley This is where Mattamy’s Condos, Apartments and TH Developments are The Keeley is uniquely located across “The Lake” and will forever have unobstructed views to the east over the park, and to the west over a large ravine system. TAS is also dedicating a park to the south of The Keeley. The north is a low- rise neighbourhood. The Keeley’s location has the benefit of having a minimum of 42,000 new jobs and residences within walking distance, which will put upward pressure on real estate values in the area, without being in the middle of a construction zone which will happen on the outer boundaries of the park.
    [Show full text]
  • 171 East Liberty Street LIBERTY MARKET BUILDING
    RETAIL FOR LEASE 171 East Liberty Street LIBERTY MARKET BUILDING INCREDIBLE RETAIL OPPORTUNITY IN THE LIBERTY MARKET BUILDING For more information, please contact: BRANDON GORMAN* CARMEN SIEGEL Cushman & Wakefield ULC, Brokerage Vice President Sales Representative 161 Bay Street, Suite 1500 416 359 2452 416 359 2365 Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 [email protected] [email protected] cushmanwakefield.com RETAIL FOR LEASE 171 East Liberty Street | Liberty Market Building HIGHLIGHTS • Exposure to streetfront and interior galleria • Renovated mixed-use campus in the heart of Liberty Village • Total complex comprised of over 295,000 sf of office and retail space • Retail units feature 13+ foot ceiling heights and natural light • Strong retail tenant anchors include LOCAL Public Eatery, BMO, Tim Hortons, Home Hardware, Brazen Head and Bulk Barn • Excellent shipping and receiving access • Potential for podium signage • Excellent TTC and GO Station access • Parking: - Onsite surface parking dedicated to retail visitors - Sister building, Liberty Market Lofts, provides additional below grade commercial parking PROPERTY SUMMARY - Green ‘P’ surface parking immediately west of the property Set in the heart of one of Toronto’s fastest-growing neighbourhoods, The Liberty Market Building offers retail tenants the opportunity to capitalize on a steady stream of both local and visiting clientele. With an expected 30,000 new residents, the neighbourhood’s local DETAILS demographic of young urban professionals, as well as the building’s NET RENT Negotiable close proximity to downtown, provides an ideal opportunity for ADDITIONAL RENT $19.18 PSF (est. 2019) retailers. OCCUPANCY Immediate With more than 100,000 sf of main level retail space, The Liberty TERM 5–10 years Market Building, a neighbourhood landmark, provides a unique retail AVAILABLE SPACE mix.
    [Show full text]
  • City Planning Division - Study Work Program Update
    PH20.2 REPORT FOR ACTION City Planning Division - Study Work Program Update Date: January 5, 2021 To: Planning and Housing Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Wards: All SUMMARY This report provides the City Planning Division's annual update on its Study Work Program. It outlines the Division's 58 completions and approvals in 2020, highlighting a remarkable variety of city building work. The report also provides a forecast for the Division's 2021 Study Work Program. Although this past year has not been business as usual given COVID-19 impacts, the collaborative effort with divisions across the Toronto Public Service, external agencies and community partners enabled City Planning to advance studies and initiatives in support of the City's 2019 Corporate Strategic Plan and its four Strategic Priorities on affordable housing, mobility, quality of life, and climate change and resiliency. These include affordable housing policy and programs, such as inclusionary zoning and Housing Now; new planning frameworks to guide longer term investment and growth, for example, the Golden Mile and Keele Finch Plus secondary plans; zoning initiatives including expanding permissions for outdoor patios to support bars and restaurants as part of Toronto's recovery efforts; environmental initiatives such as the Ravine Implementation Strategy; and guidelines, including the Retail Design Manual, to influence better design and development outcomes across the city. Looking ahead, the 2021 Study Work Program reflects Council's direction
    [Show full text]
  • 25-Unit Apartment Building Downtown Toronto
    FOR SALE AVISON YOUNG MULTI-RESIDENTIAL GROUP FOR SALE | 25 Units 5 & 7 Thorburn Avenue | Toronto, ON 25-Unit Apartment Building Downtown Toronto Victorian walk-up apartment building Located nearby popular Liberty Village Neighbourhood Professionally managed Nearby Exhibition GO Station Victorian Walk-Up Apartment Building 5&7 THORBURN AVENUE | TORONTO, ON Property Details Opportunity Avison Young has been mandated to advise and manage Municipal Address 5 & 7 Thorburn Avenue, Toronto, ON the sale of 5 & 7 Thorburn Avenue (the “Property” Victorian Walk-Up apartment or the “Site”). This is a unique opportunity to acquire a Description building professionally managed boutique apartment building nearby the popular Liberty Village neighbourhood. Site Area 5,005 sf Suite Mix Type Units Highlights Bachelor 21 Location | Located in downtown Toronto adjacent One-Bedroom 4 to the popular Liberty Village neighbourhood. Total 25 It is conveniently located just south of Toronto’s trendiest shopping street, Queen St W, and Hydro Bulk meter – Landlord pays minutes from the Entertainment district. Financing Treat as clear Public Transportation | Nearby Exhibition GO Station and proximity to the Gardiner Expressway and King Street streetcar. A short Financial Summary 10-minute commute via streetcar to the Entertainment District and a few minutes walk to Year 1 Projected NOI the Fashion District or the Lakeshore. Total Revenue $ 313,678 Total Operating Expenses $ 101,159 Amenities | Mix of cafes, restaurants and trendy shops, as well as gyms, art galleries, yoga Net Operating Income $ 212,519 studios and proximity to all downtown Toronto infrastructure. Victorian Walk-Up Apartment Building 5&7 THORBURN AVENUE | TORONTO, ON The Property Victorian Walk-Up Apartment Building 5&7 THORBURN AVENUE | TORONTO, ON LIBERTY VILLAGE WEST QUEEN WEST Adelaide St W Shank St King St W STANLEY PARK FASHION DISTRICT Wellington St Liberty St.
    [Show full text]
  • Inc., Urbancorp (St
    Twenty-Eighth Report to Court of July 20, 2018 KSV Kofman Inc. as CCAA Monitor of Urbancorp Toronto Management Inc., Urbancorp (St. Clair Village) Inc., Urbancorp (Patricia) Inc., Urbancorp (Mallow) Inc., Urbancorp (Lawrence) Inc., Urbancorp Downsview Park Development Inc., Urbancorp (952 Queen West) Inc., King Residential Inc., Urbancorp 60 St. Clair Inc., High Res. Inc., Bridge On King Inc. and the Affiliated Entities Listed in Schedule “A” Hereto and Seventeenth Report to Court of KSV Kofman Inc. as CCAA Monitor of Urbancorp (Woodbine) Inc., Urbancorp (Bridlepath) Inc., The Townhouses of Hogg’s Hollow Inc., King Towns Inc., Newtowns at Kingtowns Inc., Deaja Partner (Bay) Inc., and TCC/Urbancorp (Bay) Limited Partnership Contents Page 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Purposes of this Report ............................................................................. 3 1.2 Currency .................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Restrictions................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Background ........................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Urbancorp Inc. ........................................................................................... 4 3.0 Update on CCAA Proceedings.............................................................................. 4
    [Show full text]
  • Spatiality and Environmental Justice in Parkdale (Toronto) Cheryl Teelucksingh
    Document generated on 09/28/2021 10:08 a.m. Ethnologies Spatiality and Environmental Justice in Parkdale (Toronto) Cheryl Teelucksingh Espace Article abstract Space As part of the project to name environmental injustices in Canada, this article Volume 24, Number 1, 2002 explores the significance of a critical analysis of social space to understand environmental justice problems in an urban Canadian community. URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/006533ar Environmental injustices that impact on particular geographical locations have DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/006533ar a readily apparent, fixed spatial aspect. However, I argue that a broader view to the politics of how space is produced and reproduced is necessary to explain the way in which the spatial manifestations of political economic See table of contents transformations can create new and dynamic environmental injustices (Massey 1993). I at first outline some of the key components of the environmental justice perspective. Then, by drawing on critical work in the Publisher(s) area of human geography, in particular Edward Soja’s (1996) and Henri Lefebvre’s (1991) work, I review the limitations of the dominant approach to Association Canadienne d’Ethnologie et de Folklore spatiality in the American environmental justice literature. I then present my arguments in favour of a critical view to social space through a consideration ISSN of my field research findings in the Toronto community of Parkdale. 1481-5974 (print) 1708-0401 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Teelucksingh, C. (2002). Spatiality and Environmental Justice in Parkdale (Toronto). Ethnologies, 24(1), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.7202/006533ar Tous droits réservés © Ethnologies, Université Laval, 2002 This document is protected by copyright law.
    [Show full text]