Parkdale Community Planning Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Parkdale Community Full Report Economic Development (PCED) 2016 Planning Project Parkdale Community Planning Study Building a foundation for decent work, shared wealth, and equitable development in Parkdale Table of Contents Acknowledgements 02 1 Introduction 04 1–1 Why community planning in Parkdale now? 05 1–2 Four overarching Parkdale values that guide community plan- 05 ning and action 1–3 The purpose and organization of the study report 06 2 Why Community Economic Development? 07 3 Participatory Planning Process and Research Methods 10 3–1 PCED steering committee 10 3–2 Three rounds of participatory planning workshops 11 3–3 Research methods 12 4 Parkdale in Relation to Toronto and Beyond 14 5 Parkdale Neighbourhood Wellbeing Indicators 21 6 Seven Key Areas for Community Action and Policy Option 24 6–1 Social infrastructure 25 6–2 Affordable housing and land use 30 6–3 Decent work and inclusive economic opportunities 35 6–4 Food security 44 6–5 Community financing 46 6–6 Local participatory democracy 48 6–7 Cultural development 51 7 Directions for Decent Work, Shared Wealth, 52 and Equitable Development 8 Moving Forward 88 9 References 90 Acknowledgements 2 We wish to thank a number of people and organizations for supporting the Parkdale Community Economic Development Planning project. Firstly, great thanks go to the Atkinson Foundation for making this project possible through leadership, inspiration, and financial support. Special thanks also go to all community members, agency staff and community leaders who took the time to participate in interviews, surveys, focus groups and participatory planning workshops. The PCED project has been supported by existing collaborative initiatives funded by the Metcalf Foundation, the Ontario Trillium Foundation, the Echo Foundation, and the Catharine Donnelly Foundation. We are also grateful to Richard Maaranen from the University of Toronto’s Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership (NCRP) project and Heath Priston from the City of Toronto’s Social Development Finance and Administration for providing data for the project. Acknowledgements 3 The PCED Steering Committee Members Project Contributors and Advisors Anna Bartula (Parkdale Village BIA) Catalyst Centre Alexander Gopen (York FES Student Intern) Daniel Liadsky (Consultant) Ayal Dinner (Greenest City) Greg Sutter (Wellesley Institute) Bob Rose (PARC) Matthew Adams (Consultant) Cassandra Wong Sally Miller (Consultant) (Parkdale Community Information Centre) PNLT Board & Research Committee Dennis Long (Breakaway Addiction Services) Flordeliz Dandal (Kababayan Multicultural Centre) Interpreter Ibrahim Absiye (CultureLink) Sonam Wangmo Jason Mckinney (Jeremiah Community) Joshua Barndt (Parkdale Neighbourhood Land Trust) Report Reviewers Joshua Walters (Jeremiah Community) Emily Paradis (University of Toronto, NCRP) Joyce Brown (Working for Change) Joshua Bardnt (PNLT) Julia Barnett (Parkdale Community Health Centre) Joyce Brown (Working for Change) Karen Prosper (Arrabon House) Leslie McDonald (Habitat Services) Kate Declerck (Parkdale Project Read) Maureen Fair (West Neighbourhood House) Lisa King (Toronto Public Health) Victor Willis (PARC) Leslie McDonald (Habitat Services) Maureen Fair (West Neighbourhood House) Report Editors Michael Burtt (Making Room) Aviva Coopersmith Mike Creek (Working for Change) Brendan Ouellette Miranda Huska (Toronto Public Library) James MacNevin Nancy Henderson (Parkdale Community Legal Services) Nancy Henderson (Parkdale Community Legal Services) Nancy Steckley (Parkdale Community Health Centre) Noel Simpson (Regeneration Community Services) Designer Paolo Staffieri (City of Toronto) Joshua Barndt Pat Baranek (Centre for Mindfulness Studies) JP King Patricia O’Connell (Sistering) Kyosuke Nishida Paul Bruce (COTA) Natsumi Saito Rick Eagan (West Neighbourhood House) Sarosh Anwar (City of Toronto) Report Author Shirley Roberts (Parkdale Community Health Centre) Kuni Kamizaki (PARC, PNLT) Stan Chase (Parkdale Project Read) Susanna Redekop (West End Food Coop) To learn more about this report or to get involved contact: Tita Ang-angco (Centre for Mindfulness Studies) Kuni Kamizaki (Report Author | Lead Planner) Tsering N Thonsur (Parkdale Intercultural Association) [email protected] Veronica Feihl (Roncesvalles Village BIA) Victor Willis (PARC) Walter Rojenko (St. Joseph’s Health Centre) Student Interns and Community Volunteers Alexander Gopen Andrew Winchur Francis Yoo Julia Bahen Lynn Sky Katie Plaizier Mercedes Sharpe Zayas Monica Da Ponte Myia Daver Introduction 4 01 Introduction The Parkdale Community Economic Development (PCED) Planning Project is an 18-month neighbourhood- wide planning initiative for Parkdale. Supported by the Atkinson Foundation, the PCED project is led by Parkdale Activity-Recreation Centre (PARC), with extensive collaboration among over 25 organizations working in Parkdale. The project combines community action research, stakeholder engagement, and participatory planning to develop future visions of Parkdale, and community strategies to realize them. The project goal is to create a Parkdale Neighbourhood Plan for decent work, shared wealth building, and equitable development. Introduction 5 1–1 Why community planning in Parkdale now? public infrastructure by the federal government is another opening. In addition to these political opportunities, there is Parkdale is changing rapidly. This comes as little surprise to a growing movement in alternative approaches to community those living and working in Parkdale. Neighbourhood economic development (CED) in and beyond Toronto. The change is not new to Parkdale. Indeed, Parkdale has been growing socio-spatial inequality, precarious work, and under constant pressure of neighbourhood change – from the displacement are imperatives to rethink the local economy. Gardiner Expressway construction in the 1960s, to There is a pressing need to explore ways to promote shared deinstitutionalization in the 1970s, to the influx of artists wealth, decent work, and equitable development. This emerging and higher-income residents starting in the 1990s (Slater CED movement encourages us not only to respond to 2004a). And yet, for the past decade, the pace and degree of neighbourhood change, but also to proactively build more gentrification has intensified. For example, Parkdale’s main equitable local economies. Taken together, the PCED project commercial street, Queen Street West, has seen a growing furnishes timely opportunities for participatory planning and number of new restaurants and bars that cater to outside and community engagement to envision the future of Parkdale high-end clientele, pushing out local-serving businesses. that we want to create together. Pressures on the affordability of high-rise rental apartments in South Parkdale have increased rapidly after corporate 1–2 Four overarching Parkdale values that guide landlords started to raise rents higher than provincial rent community planning and action guidelines, resulting in intense eviction pressures. These are only two examples that aptly demonstrate the rapid changes The PCED project has been informed by four core and displacement pressures underway in Parkdale. neighbourhood values that emerged from the community Increasing pressures from gentrification and real estate planning process: diversity, affordability, inclusion, and reinvestment have endangered local community assets, equity (see p. 10 for more details on the planning process). assets that have kept Parkdale diverse, affordable, and Firstly, Parkdale is a socially, culturally, and economically accessible to diverse community members, particularly for diverse neighbourhood. This diversity attracts a wide range low-income and marginalized community members. of community members who choose to live, stay, and socialize in Parkdale. The second value is affordability, What is at stake now is the future of Parkdale. The effects which makes it possible for diverse community members – of neighbourhood change are a shared concern. We know regardless of different socio-economic and cultural that change happens, but we also know that how change backgrounds – to call Parkdale their home. This combination happens is not inevitable. Strategies and policy tools to of diversity and affordability creates a neighbourhood guide neighbourhood change and local economies do exist. condition for the third value, inclusion. The fourth value – In fact, Parkdale is already building those strategies, such although more implicit in our planning process – is equity. as the Parkdale Neighbourhood Land Trust, Toronto’s first Equity is an important lens when we think of a question of community land trust that aims to acquire and hold land “differences” in Parkdale. for community benefits, or the Co-op Cred program that offers decent supportive work opportunities. A unique and Our community needs and assets mapping process remarkable strength of Parkdale lies in the diversity of the demonstrated diverse community members have an unequal neighbourhood’s community-led initiatives. What is needed, access to and a varying degree of dependence on community then, is to explore how we can align those strategies and work assets. For example, community assets for one community together to address growing inequality and poverty, and group – a range of fresh food options in Parkdale – are not build a more equitable neighbourhood. This is why this accessible for other community groups. For some, a local community planning initiative is vital now to building