2008 Report Relies on the Same Assessment Data As That Used to Report on Status in 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2008 Report Relies on the Same Assessment Data As That Used to Report on Status in 2006 State of Maine Department of Environmental Protection Kennebunk River, Maine 2008 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report Document Number: DEPLW0895 2008 Maine Integrated Water Quality Report Table of Contents Chapter 1 Preface.................................................................................................9 Data Sources and Acknowledgements .....................................................10 Sources of River and Stream Assessment Data.............................................. 10 Sources of Lake Assessment Data.................................................................. 10 Sources of Marine Assessment Data............................................................... 11 Sources of Wetlands Assessment Data........................................................... 11 Chapter 2 Executive Summary and Response to Comments .............................12 Executive Summary ..................................................................................12 Surface Waters................................................................................................. 12 Wetlands .......................................................................................................... 14 Ground Water................................................................................................... 14 Response to Comments ...........................................................................16 Process to Solicit Public Comments ................................................................ 16 Summary of Public Comments and Responses .............................................. 19 Chapter 3 Background ........................................................................................28 State Atlas and Water Quality Standards .................................................28 Water Quality Standards Program ................................................................... 31 Highlights for Point Source Pollution Control Programs............................31 Technical Assistance / Pollution Prevention Program ..................................... 31 Construction of Wastewater Treatment Facilities ............................................ 32 Maine Combined Sewer Overflow Program..................................................... 32 Small Community Facilities Program ............................................................... 33 Licensing of Wastewater Discharges............................................................... 34 Overboard Discharge Grant Program .............................................................. 34 Compliance Evaluation..................................................................................... 36 Enforcement of Water Quality Laws................................................................. 37 Nature & Extent of Nonpoint Sources of Pollutants and Program Recommendations ....................................................................................37 The Maine NPS Water Pollution Control Program........................................... 37 Coastal Nonpoint Source Priority Watersheds................................................. 38 Watershed Management for Stormwater Programs ........................................ 39 Land Use and Growth Management ................................................................ 40 Education and Outreach ...........................................................................41 The Environmental Impact and Economic & Social Costs/Benefits of Effective Water Quality Programs.............................................................42 Nonpoint Source Management ........................................................................ 42 Economic Contribution of Maine Great Ponds................................................. 43 The Pollution Prevention (P2) Program ........................................................... 43 Chapter 4 Surface Water Monitoring & Assessments.........................................45 Assessment Methodology.........................................................................45 Listing Methodology for the 2008 305b / 303d Integrated Report List ............. 45 Assessment Criteria..................................................................................50 Rivers and Streams.......................................................................................... 50 Lakes and Ponds.............................................................................................. 51 Estuarine and Marine Waters........................................................................... 51 Data Interpretation............................................................................................ 52 Integrated Report Lists of Categories 1 Through 5...................................54 Rivers / Streams .......................................................................................59 Water Classification Program........................................................................... 59 Summary of Statewide River and Stream Attainment Status .......................... 61 Main Stems of Major Rivers ............................................................................. 64 Toxics ............................................................................................................... 64 Maine DEP 2008 305(b) Report and 303(d) List 2 2008 Maine Integrated Water Quality Report Aquatic Life Monitoring..................................................................................... 64 Reports of Fish Kills ......................................................................................... 65 Achieving Comprehensive Assessment of All Streams: Probability-based Design Monitoring ............................................................................................ 65 Lakes / Ponds ...........................................................................................65 Attainment of Classification.............................................................................. 66 Invasive Aquatic Plants .................................................................................... 70 Estuaries / Ocean .....................................................................................70 Background ...................................................................................................... 71 Sources of Monitoring Data.............................................................................. 72 Summary of Statewide Status.......................................................................... 73 Protection of Marine Life (Designated use: Habitat for fish and estuarine / marine life)........................................................................................................ 75 Casco Bay Estuary Partnership ....................................................................... 75 Chapter 5 Wetlands ............................................................................................77 Background...............................................................................................77 Federal Regulation........................................................................................... 77 Wetlands Regulatory Program in Maine’s Organized Towns .......................... 77 Wetlands Regulatory Program in Unorganized Territories .............................. 78 Development of Wetland Water Quality Standards...................................78 Integrity of Wetland Resources.................................................................79 Wetland Monitoring and Assessment............................................................... 79 Extent of Wetland Resources ...................................................................80 Wetland Loss Tracking in Maine’s Organized Towns...................................... 80 Wetland Loss Tracking in Maine’s Unorganized Territories............................. 82 Chapter 6 Groundwater Monitoring & Assessments ..........................................83 Overview ...................................................................................................83 Background...............................................................................................83 Assessment of Ground Water Quality.......................................................84 Aquifer Characterization Activities ................................................................... 84 Overview of Ground Water Contamination Sources ........................................ 84 Petroleum Storage Tanks and Product Spills ...........................................85 Underground Tanks.......................................................................................... 85 Above Ground Storage Tanks.......................................................................... 86 Oil or Hazardous Materials Spills..............................................................87 Agriculture.................................................................................................88 Maine's Nutrient Management Law.................................................................. 88 Pesticides ......................................................................................................... 88 Landfills.....................................................................................................89 Active Landfills ................................................................................................. 89 Inactive
Recommended publications
  • Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary
    Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance: Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary WHY IS THIS AREA SIGNIFICANT? The Kennebec Estuary Focus Area contains more than 20 percent of Maine’s tidal marshes, a significant percentage of Maine’s sandy beach and associated dune Biophysical Region habitats, and globally rare pitch pine • Central Maine Embayment woodland communities. More than two • Cacso Bay Coast dozen rare plant species inhabit the area’s diverse natural communities. Numerous imperiled species of animals have been documented in the Focus Area, and it contains some of the state’s best habitat for bald eagles. OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION » Work with willing landowners to permanently protect remaining undeveloped areas. » Encourage town planners to improve approaches to development that may impact Focus Area functions. » Educate recreational users about the ecological and economic benefits provided by the Focus Area. » Monitor invasive plants to detect problems early. » Find ways to mitigate past and future contamination of the watershed. For more conservation opportunities, visit the Beginning with Habitat Online Toolbox: www.beginningwithhabitat.org/ toolbox/about_toolbox.html. Rare Animals Rare Plants Natural Communities Bald Eagle Lilaeopsis Estuary Bur-marigold Coastal Dune-marsh Ecosystem Spotted Turtle Mudwort Long-leaved Bluet Maritime Spruce–Fir Forest Harlequin Duck Dwarf Bulrush Estuary Monkeyflower Pitch Pine Dune Woodland Tidewater Mucket Marsh Bulrush Smooth Sandwort
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Articles.Pdf
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
    [Show full text]
  • Mainedot Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 2-2019 MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021" (2019). Transportation Documents. 124. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/124 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 February 2019 February 21, 2019 MaineDOT Customers and Partners: On behalf of the 2,000 valued employees of the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), I am privileged to present this 2019 Edition of our Work Plan for the three Calendar Years 2019, 2020 and 2021. Implementation of this plan allows us to achieve our mission of responsibly providing our customers with the safest and most reliable transportation system possible, given available resources. Like all recent editions, this Work Plan includes all capital projects and programs, maintenance and operations activities, planning initiatives, and administrative functions. This plan contains 2,193 individual work items with a total value of $2.44 billion, consisting principally of work to be delivered or coordinated through MaineDOT, but also including funding and work delivered by other transportation agencies that receive federal funds directly including airports and transit agencies. Although I have the pleasure of presenting this plan, it is really the product of staff efforts dating back to the summer of last year.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 CCSWCD Royal River Water Quality Management Plan
    " . ROYAL RIV£~ WATERSHED: A W1AT£R QUALITY .'l ·MANA6£M£NT PLAN 1 I I J \ ] ( J J J J j J Cumberland County SWCD Project Staff & Report Production Forrest Bell, Project Manager Alison Kisch, Conservation Technician Linda Johnson, Research Assistant ACKNOW'LED6.MENTS The Royal River Watershed Project and this report would not have been possible without the assistance of many individuals, groups and agencies. We would like to recognize and thank the following contributors: Royal River Watershed Advisory Committee Charlie Chandler, resident, New Gloucester Bill Ecyleshymer, resident, Yarmouth Judith Ecyleshymer, resident, Yarmouth Dottie Laber, public relations advisor, Orono Edwin Springer, resident, Brunswick Ted Teidemann, resident, North Yarmouth Royal River Watershed Technical Advisory Committee and Report Review Team Deb Aja, Maine DEP Susan Beede, US EPA John Boland, ME Inland Fish & Wildlife Lenny Brooks, New Gloucester David Chiapetta, USDA NRCS Ross Cudlitz, CCSWCD Chris Curtis, Yarmouth Water District Cliff Curtis, Maine DOT Lee Doggett, Maine DEP Betty Farley, CCSWCD Melissa Gormley Florence Grosvenor, Maine DEP Katherine Groves, Casco Bay Est. Project Sherry Hanson, Casco Bay Est. Proj. Phoebe Hardesty, Andy Valley SWCD Mary Holman, Friends of Royal River Bob Houston, North Yarmouth resident John Jemison, UMaine Coop. Exten. Don Kale, Maine DEP Steve Linnell, Greater Portland COG Greg & Lisa Taylor Lord, Americorps Janet Mclaughlin, Town of Yarmouth Wayne Munroe, USDA NRCS Steve Ranney, City of Auburn Diane Switzer, US EPA Leon Tsomides, Maine DEP Peter Wagner, UMaine Coop. Extension Lois Winter, US Fish & Wildlife Serv. Don Witherill, Maine DEP Diane Yorke, US Forest Service Project sponsors/partners and their roles • Cumberland County Soil and Water Conservation District (CCSWCD) is the main sponsor of the Royal River Watershed 104(b)(3) Planning Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Expressions of Legislative Sentiment Recognizing
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from electronic originals (may include minor formatting differences from printed original) Senate Legislative Record One Hundred and Twenty-Sixth Legislature State of Maine Daily Edition First Regular Session December 5, 2012 - July 9, 2013 First Special Session August 29, 2013 Second Regular Session January 8, 2014 - May 1, 2014 First Confirmation Session July 31, 2014 Second Confirmation Session September 30, 2014 pages 1 - 2435 SENATE LEGISLATIVE RECORD Senate Legislative Sentiment Appendix Cheryl DiCara, of Brunswick, on her retirement from the extend our appreciation to Mr. Seitzinger for his commitment to Department of Health and Human Services after 29 years of the citizens of Augusta and congratulate him on his receiving this service. During her career at the department, Ms. DiCara award; (SLS 7) provided direction and leadership for state initiatives concerning The Family Violence Project, of Augusta, which is the the prevention of injury and suicide. She helped to establish recipient of the 2012 Kennebec Valley Chamber of Commerce Maine as a national leader in the effort to prevent youth suicide Community Service Award. The Family Violence Project provides and has been fundamental in uniting public and private entities to support and services for survivors of domestic violence in assist in this important work. We send our appreciation to Ms. Kennebec County and Somerset County. Under the leadership of DiCara for her dedicated service and commitment to and Deborah Shephard, the Family Violence Project each year compassion for the people of Maine, and we extend our handles 4,000 calls and nearly 3,000 face to face visits with congratulations and best wishes to her on her retirement; (SLS 1) victims at its 3 outreach offices and provides 5,000 nights of Wild Oats Bakery and Cafe, of Brunswick, on its being safety for victims at its shelters.
    [Show full text]
  • 308 Harbor Waterfront and Boat Ordinance
    CHAPTER 308 HARBOR, WATERFRONT AND BOAT ORDINANCE Town of Yarmouth, Maine Recodified: 1/15/98 Repealed and Replaced: 2/15/01 Amended: 4/19/01 Amended: 5/17/01 Repealed and Replaced: 2/20/03 Amended: 11/20/03 Repealed and Replaced: 2/17/05 Amended: 4/20/06 Amended: 8/17/06 Revised with Corrections: 7/1/08 Amended: 1/15/09 Amended: 4/15/10 Amended: 8/21/14 Amended: 3/21/19 Amended: 5/20/21 CHAPTER 308 HARBOR, WATERFRONT AND BOAT ORDINANCE Table of Contents ARTICLE I ..................................................................................................................................... 1 A. TITLE ................................................................................................................................... 1 B. PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 1 C. AUTHORITY ....................................................................................................................... 1 D. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED ................................................................................... 1 ARTICLE II .................................................................................................................................... 3 A. APPOINTMENT OF HARBOR MASTER ...................................................................... 3 B. TERM OF OFFICE............................................................................................................. 3 C. APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download
    Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance: Kennebec Estuary Focus Areas of Statewide Ecological Significance Kennebec Estuary Focus Area Municipalities Arrowsic Bath Bowdoinham Brunswick Dresden Gardiner Georgetown Perkins Twp Swan Island Phippsburg Pittston Richmond Topsham West Bath Westport Island Wiscasset Woolwich WHY IS THIS AREA SIGNIFICANT? Rare Animals The Kennebec Estuary Focus Area contains Bald Eagle Piping Plover Spotted Turtle Least Tern more than 20 percent of Maine’s tidal marshes, a Harlequin Duck Roseate Tern significant percentage of Maine’s sandy beach and Tidewater Mucket Arctic Tern associated dune habitats, and globally rare pitch Ribbon Snake Short-nosed Sturgeon Redfin Pickerel Saltmarsh Sharp-tailed pine woodland communities. More than two dozen Atlantic Salmon Sparrow rare plant species inhabit the area’s diverse natural communities. Eight imperiled species of animals have Rare Plants Lilaeopsis Eaton’s Bur-marigold been documented in the Focus Area, and it contains Mudwort Estuary Bur-marigold some of the state’s best habitat for bald eagles. Dwarf Bulrush Long-leaved Bluet Marsh Bulrush Estuary Monkeyflower Dry Land Sedge Smooth Sandwort OPPORTUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION Yellow Pond-lily Beaked Spikerush » Work with willing landowners to permanently Clammy Azalea Long’s Bitter-cress Pygmyweed Spongy Arrow-head protect remaining undeveloped areas. Tidal Spikerush Narrow-leaf Arrowhead » Encourage town planners to improve approaches Stiff Arrow-head Sweet Pepper-bush to development that may impact Focus Area Parker’s Pipewort Small Salt-marsh Aster Mountain-laurel Horned Pondweed functions. Marsh-elder Saltmarsh False-foxglove » Educate recreational users about the ecological and Water Pimpernel Large-purple False Foxglove economic benefits provided by the Focus Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Metamorphism in Sothwestern Casco Bay
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository New England Intercollegiate Geological NEIGC Trips Excursion Collection 1-1-1965 Stratigraphy and Metamorphism in Sothwestern Casco Bay Marc W. Bodine, Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips Recommended Citation Marc W. Bodine, Jr., "Stratigraphy and Metamorphism in Sothwestern Casco Bay" (1965). NEIGC Trips. 74. https://scholars.unh.edu/neigc_trips/74 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the New England Intercollegiate Geological Excursion Collection at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NEIGC Trips by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRIP F Leader: Marc W. Bodine, Jr. State University of New York at Binghamton Objectives of Trip • ® m This excursion will visit the area in Cape Elizabeth where the several formations of the Casco Bay Group as originally defined by Katz (1917) and the older Cushing Formation are exposed with meta­ morphic grade ranging from the chlorite subfacies through the almandine subfacies of the greenschist facies using the Eskola facies classification as modified by Fyfe, Turner, and Verhoogen (1958). Additional stops will be made in Falmouth where the lowest unit of the Casco Bay Group is exposed exhibiting lower almandine amphibolite facies metamorphism in contact with the Pejepscot Forma­ tion (Fisher, 1941), a highly migmatized quartz-biotite-plagioclase schistose paragneiss of the sillimanite subfacies of the almandine- amphibotite facies. The evidence for interpreting this contact as a fault contact is the abrupt change in metamorphic grade and the abrupt appearance of pegmatites, granites, and migmatites.
    [Show full text]
  • Shellfish Conservation Committee Minutes DATE: 6/4/2019 TIME: 7:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: COMMUNITY ROOM
    Shellfish Conservation Committee Minutes DATE: 6/4/2019 TIME: 7:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: COMMUNITY ROOM Commission Members: Attendance: A for absent, P for present Attendance Name Town Term P Harold Hibbard III North Yarmouth June 30, 2020 P Kevin Oliver North Yarmouth June 30, 2021 A Clifford Small North Yarmouth June 30, 2019 P Judy Colby-George Yarmouth December 31, 2020 P Dillon Hough Yarmouth December 31, 2019 P Ben Tupper Yarmouth December 31, 2020 Staff Members: Attendance Name Title/Role P Will Owen Shellfish Warden A Richard Plourde Town Council Liaison A Pete Thayer Dept. of Marine Resources Guests/Diggers Amanda Moeser, Jessica Joyce Minutes Votes/Quorum: All final votes of the commission shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of those members present and voting provided a quorum is present. A quorum shall be deemed present if a minimum of four (4) members are present. A CHAPTER 305 10 quorum shall be required for the transaction of all business except that a smaller number can adjourn to another time. Reviewed Minutes for May, a motion was made and seconded to accept the minutes as amended – note that Will Owen and Richard Plourde were in attendance at the May meeting . Vote taken, 4 for, 0 against, 0 abstain. Agenda topics 1. DISCUSSION Warden’s Report See attached report PERSON ACTION ITEMS DEADLINE RESPONSIBLE 2. DISCUSSION Grant Proposal Judy has done nothing more on the project this month. The fields she is currently gathering include: MapLot Status (active, removed, remediated, question) Problem (description from DMR or field observation) ObserveDate (Date of Observation) Action (recommended action or next steps) ActionDate (Date action taken) Comments PERSON ACTION ITEMS DEADLINE RESPONSIBLE Judy will continue to work on developing a process for collecting the data and which parcels we need to Judy July 15 collect data for.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level Rise and Casco Bay's Wetlands
    Sea Level Rise and Casco Bay’s Wetlands: A Look at Potential Impacts FREEPORT EDITION Muskie School of Public Service University of Southern Maine www.cascobayestuary.org PO Box 9300 Portland, ME 04104-9300 207.780.4820 (phone) 207.228.8460 (fax) Sea Level Rise and Casco Bay’s Wetlands: A Look at Potential Impacts • Curtis Bohlen • Marla Stelk • Matthew Craig • Caitlin Gerber This report is one of a series of ten reports focusing on the following Casco Bay municipalities: Brunswick Phippsburg Cape Elizabeth Portland Falmouth South Portland Freeport West Bath Harpswell Yarmouth Assistance with field work and other data collection provided by Melissa Anson and Melissa Smith. GIS analysis provided by Lauren Redmond and Caitlin Gerber. These reports were funded in whole or in part by the Maine Coastal Program under NOAA award no. NA10N0S4190188 and the US EPA under grant #CE 9614191. The report does not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring agencies, and no official endorsement should be inferred. Casco Bay Estuary Partnership 2013 Overview The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a report in 2007 documenting a rise in average global temperatures, ocean temperatures and sea level rise. The sea level off Maine’s 3,478 miles of coastline, as measured by the Portland, Maine tide gauge, has been rising at a rate of 1.8 + 0.1mm/yr since 1912. This is markedly similar to the global average sea level rise determined by the IPCC. The most likely impacts of sea level rise in Maine will be inland migration of beaches, dunes and tidal wetlands over the next century.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of LIDAR for Simulating Existing and Potential Future Marsh Conditions in Casco Bay
    Assessment of LIDAR for Simulating Existing and Potential Future Marsh Conditions in Casco Bay Peter A. Slovinsky, Coastal Geologist Stephen M. Dickson, Marine Geologist Maine Geological Survey, Department of Conservation The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the Casco Bay Estuary Partnership under U.S. EPA assistance agreement CE 97134601 to the University of Southern Maine. TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND..........................................................................................................................................1 2006 FEMA LIDAR DATA ...............................................................................1 PROJECT PURPOSE.................................................................................................................................2 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................2 REAL TIME KINEMATIC GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM SURVEYS ...................................2 Cousins River, Yarmouth ..........................................................................3 Back Cove, Portland ................................................................................4 Thomas Bay, Brunswick ...........................................................................6 FEMA LIDAR DATA PROCESSING.......................................................................6 Bare Earth XYZ files ................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The Dirty History of Portland Harbor
    Reprinted from a 1994 publication The Dirty History of Portland Harbor hen scientists began looking closely at the sediments and at W the bottom of Casco Bay beginning in the early 1980s, they confronted a pollution puzzle. Sediments taken from various locations throughout the Bay, and especially in Portland Harbor, held a wide variety of potentially toxic chemicals. Until we know more about how these heavy metals, pesticides and other compounds affect marine life, it’s hard to know what lasting impact the pollution in Casco Bay may have. But it was decided that the more we know about where those pollutants came from, the better chances we will have in preventing future problems. The Casco Bay Estuary Project (now Casco Bay Early industry was limited by natural energy sources, like this tidal mill at Estuary Partnership) commissioned environmental Stroudwater. (courtesy: Sullivan Train & Photo) historian Edward Hawes to do some detective work, hoping that he could turn up some puzzle pieces from the Casco Bay. Lead, cadmium and mercury concentrations were watersheds that feed the Bay. The industrial legacy he found comparatively high in Back Cove, as were lead and mercury was a surprise to almost anyone who thinks they know the in the inner Fore River. Lead was also relatively high in the Portland area. Presumpscot River estuary. Additional metals — nickel, silver, arsenic, chromium A Pollution Problem and zinc — were evident in lesser concentrations. This widespread contamination was a little mystifying. In this age hen investigators began sampling Casco Bay’s of environmental regulation, how could so much pollution sediments in the 1980s, levels of pollution have landed in the Bay? W were found that merited additional attention.
    [Show full text]