DOCSLIB.ORG

Highest and Best Use and Property Rights—Does It Make a Difference? by Stephen F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highest and Best Use and Property Rights—Does It Make a Difference? by Stephen F The Appraisal SUMMER 2018 Journal Volume LXXXVI, Number 3 F Highest and Best Use and Property Rights—Does It Make a Difference? by Stephen F. Fanning, MAI, AI-GRS, Larry T. Wright, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, and Rick J. Muenks, JD, MAI PAGE 171 Land Value Differentials Resulting from Variability between the Sales Comparison and Income Approaches in Timberland Valuation by Austin B. Harris, Christopher N. Singleton, MAI, and Thomas J. Straka, PhD PAGE 192 Market Value: What Does It Really Mean? by Michael V. Sanders, MAI, SRA PAGE 206 Contents The Appraisal Journal | Summer 2018 | Volume LXXXVI, Number 3 ii Mission Statement iv Annual Conference Announcement v A Message from the Editor-in-Chief COLUMNS & DEPARTMENTS 161 Cases in Brief Recent Court Decisions on Real Estate and Valuation by Scott B. Mueller, JD 219 Resource Center Self-Storage and Eminent Domain Resources for Appraisal Institute Professionals by Dan L. Swango, PhD, MAI, SRA 233 Letters to the Editor PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES 171 Highest and Best Use and Property Rights—Does It Make a Difference? by Stephen F. Fanning, MAI, AI-GRS, Larry T. Wright, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, and Rick J. Muenks, JD, MAI 192 Land Value Differentials Resulting from Variability between the Sales Comparison and Income Approaches in Timberland Valuation by Austin B. Harris, Christopher N. Singleton, MAI, and Thomas J. Straka, PhD 206 Market Value: What Does It Really Mean? by Michael V. Sanders, MAI, SRA ANNOUNCEMENTS 235 Appraisal Institute Publications 237 Appraisal Institute Continuing Education 239 Article Topics in Need of Authors 241 Manuscript Guide 242 Appraisal Journal Order Form Cover Photo: Shutterstock.com www.appraisalinstitute.org Summer 2018 • The Appraisal Journal i The Appraisal Journal Published by the Appraisal Institute James L. Murrett, MAI, SRA, President Stephen S. Wagner, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, President-Elect Jefferson L. Sherman, MAI, AI-GRS, Vice President Jim Amorin, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, Chief Executive Officer Stephen T. Crosson, MAI, SRA, Editor-in-Chief Ken Chitester, APR, Director of Communications Nancy K. Bannon, Managing Editor Justin Richards, Senior Communications Coordinator The Appraisal Journal (ISSN 0003-7087) is published quarterly (Winter, Spring, Summer, and Fall). © 2018 by the Appraisal Institute, an Illinois Not-for-Profit Corporation at 200 W. Madison, Suite 1500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. www.appraisalinstitute.org. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, modified, rewritten, or distributed, electronically or by any other means, without the expressed written permission of the Appraisal Institute. Periodical postage paid at Chicago, Illinois, and at additional mailing offices. Annual Subscription Rates: Domestic—$48 standard rate, $100 library rate, $38 AI rate, $20 student rate, $25 single copy. International—$95 standard rate, $145 library rate, $65 student rate. Telephone orders: 312-335-4437. Online orders: http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/store/periodicals/the-appraisal-journal/ Postmaster: Send address changes to Order Fulfillment Department, The Appraisal Journal, 200 W. Madison, Suite 1500, Chicago, Illinois 60606. Allow six weeks for changes. To opt out of print copy delivery, email [email protected] Design and production services provided by Grayton Integrated Publishing. www.graytonpub.com Mission Statement: The Appraisal Journal is published to provide a peer-reviewed forum for information and ideas on the practice and theory of valuation and analyses of real estate and related interests. The Appraisal Journal presents ideas, concepts, and possible appraisal and analytical techniques to be considered; some articles are for the development and expansion of appraisal theory while others are useful in the evolution of practice. Disclaimer: The materials presented in this publication represent the opinions and views of the authors. Although these materials may have been reviewed by members of the Appraisal Institute, the views and opinions expressed herein are not endorsed or approved by the Appraisal Institute as policy unless adopted by the Board of Directors pursuant to the Bylaws of the Appraisal Institute. While substantial care has been taken to provide accurate and current data and information, the Appraisal Institute does not warrant the accuracy or timeliness of the data and information contained herein. Further, any principles and conclusions presented in this publication are subject to court decisions and to local, state, and federal laws and regulations and any revisions of such laws and regulations. This publication is for educational and informational purposes only with the understanding that the Appraisal Institute is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice or services. Nothing in these materials is to be construed as the offering of such advice or services. If expert advice or services are required, readers are responsible for obtaining such advice or services from appropriate professionals. Nondiscrimination Policy: Organized in 1932, the Appraisal Institute advocates equal opportunity and nondiscrimination in the appraisal profession and conducts its activities in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws. The Appraisal Institute advances professionalism and ethics, global standards, methodologies, and practices through the professional development of property economics worldwide. ii The Appraisal Journal • Summer 2018 www.appraisalinstitute.org The Appraisal Journal Editorial Board Stephen T. Crosson, MAI, SRA,* Chair, Dallas, Texas Joseph F. Consoli, MAI, Baltimore, Maryland Karl P. Finkelstein, MAI, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina Julie Friess, SRA, Sedona, Arizona Walter E. Gardiner, SRA, AI-RRS, Hammond, Louisiana James H. Martin, MAI, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina Heather M. Placer, MAI, SRA, Midlothian, Virginia Stephen D. Roach, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, San Diego, California Larry T. Wright, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, Houston, Texas The Appraisal Journal Review Panel Gregory J. Accetta, MAI, AI-GRS, Providence, Rhode Island Melanie Sieger, MAI, AI-GRS, Chevy Chase, Maryland Anthony C. Barna, MAI, SRA, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Dan L. Swango, PhD, MAI, SRA, Tucson, Arizona C. Kevin Bokoske, MAI, AI-GRS, AI-RRS, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida James D. Vernor, PhD, MAI, Atlanta, Georgia Robert C. Clark, MAI, Chevy Chase, Maryland George Dell, MAI, SRA,* San Diego, California The Appraisal Journal Academic Review Panel Larry O. Dybvig, MAI, Vancouver, British Columbia Tim Allen, PhD, Florida Gulf Coast University Timothy A. Eisenbraun, MAI, SRA, Southfield, Michigan Anjelita Cadena, PhD, University of North Texas Stephen F. Fanning, MAI, AI-GRS,* Denton, Texas Peter F. Colwell, PhD, University of Illinois Kenneth G. Foltz, MAI, SRA, Wilmington, North Carolina François Des Rosiers, PhD, Laval University Jack P. Friedman, PhD, MAI, SRA, Chicago, Illinois Barry A. Diskin, PhD, MAI, AI-GRS, Florida State University Brian L. Goodheim, MAI, SRA, Boulder, Colorado Donald R. Epley, PhD, MAI, SRA, University of South Alabama Robert M. Greene, PhD, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, Olympia, Washington Jeffrey D. Fisher, PhD, Indiana University Thomas O. Jackson, PhD, MAI,* College Station, Texas Terry V. Grissom, PhD,* University of Missouri–Kansas City John A. Kilpatrick, PhD, MAI, Seattle, Washington Thomas W. Hamilton, PhD, MAI,* Roosevelt University S. Warren Klutz III, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, Bristol, Tennessee William G. Hardin III, PhD, Florida International University Douglas M. Laney, MAI, Tucson, Arizona Mark Lee Levine, PhD, JD, MAI, University of Denver Calvin M. Lassere, MAI, Atlanta, Georgia Kenneth M. Lusht, PhD, MAI, SRA,* Florida Gulf Coast University, David C. Lennhoff, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, Darnestown, Maryland Penn State University Mark R. Linné, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, Lakewood, Colorado Barrett A. Slade, PhD, MAI, Brigham Young University Mark E. Mitchell, MAI, Louisville, Kentucky Brent C Smith, PhD, Virginia Commonwealth University Dan P. Mueller, MAI, St. Paul, Minnesota Mark A. Sunderman, PhD, University of Memphis Nathan Pomerantz, MAI, Rehovot, Israel Grant I. Thrall, PhD, University of Florida Rudy R. Robinson III, MAI, Austin, Texas Alan Tidwell, PhD, University of Alabama Dennis P. Ryan, PhD, MAI, New York, New York H. Shelton Weeks, PhD, Florida Gulf Coast University David J. Sangree, MAI, Cleveland, Ohio John E. Williams, PhD, Morehouse College John A. Schwartz, MAI, Aurora, Colorado Elaine M. Worzala, PhD, College of Charleston *Statistics Work Group member www.appraisalinstitute.org Summer 2018 • The Appraisal Journal iii From the Editor-in-Chief Stephen T. Crosson, MAI, SRA A New Look at the Basics Dear Readers: Welcome to the latest issue of The Appraisal Jour- The third article, “Market Value: What Does It nal. In this issue, you will find three feature arti- Really Mean?” by Michael V. Sanders, MAI, cles that take a new look at some basic elements SRA, reviews the market value concept and how in the valuation process. it has evolved into differing definitions. The dis- cussion illustrates how highest price and most The first article, “Highest and Best Use and probable price differ and how assumptions about Property Rights—Does It Make a Difference?” the market may affect the valuation. by Stephen F. Fanning, MAI, AI-GRS, Larry T. Wright, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS, and Rick J. In this issue you will also find the Journal’s Muenks, JD, MAI, suggests that a supported and ever-popular “Resource Center” column by Dan reasoned highest and best use analysis should Swango, PhD, MAI, SRA. In the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Real Estate Policy Priorities for the Biden-Harris Administration
    Real Estate Policy Priorities for the Biden-Harris Administration December 16, 2020 I. COVID-19 Relief for Families, State/Local Governments, and Businesses a. Direct relief to workers and families The CARES Act helped to mitigate the immediate negative economic consequences of the COVID-19 recession, “[b]y many measures the worst since the Great Depression,” according to the Congressional Research Service. The sharp declines in GDP and employment numbers last spring and summer would have been even worse without the direct relief Congress provided in March to America’s families and workers. Today, the federal government must do more. Recent data on employment and GDP growth are positive, but the economic recovery will continue to stall until the health crisis is under control. Pending manufacture and distribution of a widely available vaccine that engenders the public’s trust, we urge further direct assistance to lessen the financial pain that America’s workers will continue to feel into the holiday season and beyond Inauguration Day. New rounds of stimulus checks are needed to help families put food on the table and cover essential costs like health care and childcare, while also boosting aggregate demand throughout the economy. Also, supplemental unemployment insurance for Americans, including self-employed individuals, who have been displaced from their jobs or lost their businesses, must be a priority. A compromise is reachable to provide further jobless benefits along the lines of CARES Act assistance in a manner that does not incentivize chronic unemployment. b. Rental assistance for residential and business tenants Rents paid by residential and business tenants provide a revenue stream that redounds to the entire economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Leases: Rent Reset Analysis
    Peer-Reviewed Article Long-Term Leases: Rent Reset Analysis by Tony Sevelka, MAI, SRA, AI-GRS Abstract A provision for resetting rent is often found in long-term leases, with the objective being to periodically analyze the value attributed to the leased real estate. The property rights to be valued at each rent reset depend on the language of the lease, especially the rent reset clause. The lack of specificity associated with use of the term market value has led to questionable application of the term in rent resets. Inconsistent interpretations of a lease can lead to divergent opin- ions of value. Sometimes rent resetting provisions have no connection to the terms of the lease or the actual property rights; this may result in situations where it is difficult to apply conventional appraisal methods. This article summarizes and discusses a sample of rent reset cases and explores creative valuation solutions to rent reset valuation challenges. Introduction rent reset is dictated by the provisions of the lease, and the lease usually calls for arbitration if Rent reset clauses are typically found in long- the landlord and tenant are unable to negotiate a term leases for land (unimproved or improved).1 new rent within a specified time frame. A lease is “a contract in which the rights to use A rent reset analysis for a land lease has the and occupy land, space, or structures are trans- same objective as for a space lease—quantifying ferred by the owner to another for a specified a new rent—unless the land lease only calls for a period of time
    [Show full text]
  • APB Valuation Advisory #8 Voluntary Guidance on Recognized Valuation Methods and Techniques
    APB Valuation Advisory #8 Voluntary Guidance on Recognized Valuation Methods and Techniques: Collection and Verification of Residential Data in the Sales Comparison Approach This communication is for the purpose of issuing voluntary guidance on recognized valuation methods and techniques. Date Issued: 11/1/2016 Application: Residential Real Property, One to Four Unit Issue: As part of its ongoing responsibilities, the Appraisal Practices Board (APB) is tasked with identifying where appraisers and appraisal users believe additional guidance would be helpful. One issue identified by the APB is the Collection and Verification of Residential Data in the Sales Comparison Approach. The purpose of this document is to provide guidance to appraisers who are collecting and verifying data to be used in the sales comparison approach for residential properties. This Valuation Advisory (Advisory) is one of two that will be issued by the APB on collecting and verifying data. The APB is in the process of developing a companion advisory on the Collection and Verification of Data used in the Sales Comparison Approach for Non-Residential Properties. Subject Matter Experts: The APB established a Subject Matter Expert (SME) Panel to assist on this topic. The APB members express their sincere gratitude to the following SMEs for volunteering their time and expertise in contributing to this document: Roy F. Beery, III Houston, TX Joe McGrath Denver, CO Shari Green Roubinek Kalispell, MT Timothy O’Brien Bloomington, MN Brian Seemann Northridge, CA Shawn Telford Oxford, MS APB Valuation Advisory #8 – Collection and Verification of Residential Data in the Sales Comparison Approach © 2016 The Appraisal Foundation 1 APB Liaisons: Lisa Desmarais, Shawn Wilson, and John S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal Oversight: the Regulatory Impact on Consumers and Businesses
    Appraisal Oversight: The Regulatory Impact on Consumers and Businesses Testimony of Sara W. Stephens, MAI, CRE Before the Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Community Opportunity House Committee on Financial Services June 28, 2012 1 June 28, 2012 Madam Chairman Biggert, Ranking Member Gutierrez, and members of the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, thank you for the opportunity to share our concerns regarding “Appraisal Oversight: The Regulatory Impact on Consumer and Businesses” on behalf of the more than 23,000 members of the Appraisal Institute, the largest professional association of real estate appraisers in the United States. Today, residential appraisers face ever-mounting challenges that place the future of residential appraisal at risk. The appraisal regulatory structure has become almost entirely a “rules-based,” as opposed to a “principles- based,” system. As such, it has become a burden to appraisers and, in our view, has failed to improve overall appraisal quality or appraiser oversight and enforcement. While appraising arguably is the most heavily regulated activity within the mortgage and real estate sectors, we warn Congress that a new and excessive regulatory regime is on the cusp of being enacted by appraiser regulatory agencies without Congressional review or authorization. This is a dangerous and unjustified move that risks hamstringing and jeopardizing the real estate appraisal profession altogether. At a very basic level, the appraiser regulatory structure lacks fundamental accountability measures. In its report to Congress, the Government Accountability Office identified significant violations of internal control standards by entities that claimed such standards were designed to promote effectiveness and efficiency, and to promote accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Rent Appraisal
    MARKET RENT APPRAISAL Keyhole Reservoir Trailer Sites Crook County, Wyoming SUBMITTED TO Cindy Larom, Natural Resource Specialist Bureau of Reclamation 515 9th St., Rm. 101 Rapid City, SD 57701 IVIS: PROJECT / CASE NUMBERS R14027 / 00065192 EFFECTIVE DATE OF SURVEY December 3, 2014 DATE OF REPORT June 1, 2015 SUBMITTED BY James T. Green, MAI Adam Bradshaw Department of the Interior Office of Valuation Services 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 380 Sacramento, CA 95815 June 1, 2015 Cindy Larom, Natural Resource Specialist Bureau of Reclamation 515 9th St., Rm. 101 Rapid City, SD 57701 Re: Market Rent Appraisal Keyhole Reservoir Trailer Sites Crook County, WY Dear Ms. Larom: Per the request of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), the Office of Valuation Services has prepared this market rent appraisal. The purpose of this appraisal was to estimate the annual market rent for the trailer1 sites located along Keyhole Reservoir in Crook County, Wyoming. The intended use is to assist Reclamation in establishing the necessary fee for issuing annual license permits for use of the individual sites. The trailer sites are rented annually and the mobile home may remain on site the entire year, but full time occupancy and use is restricted to seasonal use, between May 1st & October 31st (6- months). Furthermore, BOR at their sole discretion may cancel the permit at any time. The client is the Bureau of Reclamation, US Department of the Interior. The intended user is the Bureau of Reclamation on behalf of the United States of America. There are no other authorized users of this report. This report conforms to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as well as the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Note 16 1 Arbitration
    Guide Note 16 1 Arbitration Introduction Real estate valuation professionals (“Valuer” or “Valuers”) are administrative aspects of the resolution dispute procedure than often retained to provide services in arbitration matters2 either if they had gone to trial, arbitrations are frequently less expensive as arbitrators or expert witnesses3. Arbitration is a process and produce more timely results than litigation, and issues in which the parties to a dispute agree to present their case to arbitrated do not use time on crowded Court calendars. one or more arbitrators who render a final decision to resolve Arbitration is similar to a trial, but is a somewhat more flexible the dispute. process where the parties can agree on procedure and on which When parties have a dispute, they often find themselves in issues to arbitrate. Arbitration hearings, which are conducted in litigation after one party sues the other. Parties and their conference rooms and not courtrooms, are less formal than a attorneys are increasingly using methods to resolve disputes trial in that the rules of evidence may be considered but are not without going to trial. The Courts have encouraged the use of mandatory. As in a trial, written and oral evidence is presented, these alternate processes and have upheld arbitration awards. depositions are permissible, and experts typically review and The use of arbitration is accepted by the parties to the dispute, comment on the opposing expert’s report (this is typically labelled their attorneys and the Courts because arbitration permits a “rebuttal” report in litigation and arbitration). Arbitration awards the parties to have more control over some procedural and generally are binding and final, and can be vacated (overturned) GUIDE NOTE 16 Introduction (continued) by a court only on narrow grounds which are typically limited to lack of appropriate disclosure of conflicts by an arbitrator and awards made by the arbitrator(s) that go beyond the jurisdiction of the arbitrators.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Note 13 Performing Evaluations of Real Property Collateral for Lenders
    Guide Note 13 Performing Evaluations of Real Property Collateral for Lenders Introduction Federally insured lending institutions in the United States An evaluation provides a market value of the real estate are subject to regulations regarding real estate appraisals. collateral. The preparer must be appropriately qualified and For lending transactions involving real estate, a lender must sufficiently independent from the transaction, but need not be obtain an appraisal from a state licensed or certified a state licensed or certified appraiser. Even so, appraisers are appraiser. There are fourteen exemptions from this often called upon to provide them. requirement. For three of these exemptions, in lieu of an How can an appraiser prepare an evaluation for a lender and appraisal by a licensed/certified appraiser, the comply with the Standards of Valuation Practice (SVP) or lender may obtain an evaluation1. Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP)? GUIDE NOTE 13 Basis for Proper Practice The Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2010/fil10082a.pdf issued by the federal agencies 2 in December 2010 provide full details about when appraisals and evaluations are required, who can provide them, and how they must be performed. Section V (pp. 3-5) addresses the independence requirements for both appraisals and evaluations. Section VI (pp. 5-6) addresses the selection, evaluation and monitoring the performance of those providing these services. Section XI (pp. 11-12) addresses when evaluations are required. Section XII (pp. 12-13) addresses the development process for an evaluation, and Section XIII (pp. 13-14) addresses the required content of an evaluation report.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Credit Candidate Guidebook
    Experience Credit Candidate Guidebook Effective May 11, 2018 Copyright © 2019 Appraisal Institute. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the publisher. EXPERIENCE CREDIT CANDIDATE GUIDEBOOK Table of Contents Experience Credit Criteria and Procedures ............................................................................................. 3 Standards of Professional Practice ........................................................................................................ 4 When do the Standards of Professional Practice apply? Always. .................................................... 4 Financial Reporting ..................................................................................................................... 5 Valuation Reports: Level of detail ................................................................................................. 5 Restricted Appraisal Reports ........................................................................................................ 5 Experience Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 6 What Qualifies for Specialized or Residential Experience? ..................................................................... 7 Other Requirements .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, 6Th Edition (“AI Dictionary”)
    200 W. Madison St. T 312-335-4100 Suite 1500 F 312-335-4400 Chicago, IL 60606 www.appraisalinstitute.org March 31, 2020 Ms. Amy Rasmussen, RES, AAS, FIAAO President IAAO 314 West 10th Street Kansas City, MO 64105 Re: Appraisal Institute Response to IAAO White Paper Dear Ms. Rasmussen: In August 2019, the IAAO published a white paper titled “Setting the Record Straight on Fee Simple.” As this document purports to address concepts and theories that are basic to the real property appraisal profession, the Appraisal Institute’s leadership has carefully analyzed this paper and finds that it is conceptually flawed and factually inaccurate. Our concerns are set forth specifically below. We found four overarching conceptual flaws; each will be described and then supported with examples from the IAAO white paper (the “Paper”). 1. It is foundational that each appraisal assignment starts with the appraiser identifying the problem the client needs to have solved. USPAP1 and appraisal education and guidance identify six elements to be identified in order to properly identify the problem. One of those elements is “the subject of the assignment” which includes property rights being valued2. However, the first two elements listed in USPAP are the identification of the intended users and the intended use of the assignment. The Paper addresses only the ownership rights to be valued and several conclusions drawn may be inaccurate depending on the intended use and/or intended users identified in the assignment. 2. Appraisers and those attorneys whose practice includes real property appraisal issues are generally aware that different professions define “fee simple” differently and that the definitional differences may be substantive.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgments
    Acknowledgments The following contributors deserve recognition for their efforts in developing this material: Seminar developer: Mark V. Smeltzer, SRA Reviewers: Gary T. Crabtree, SRA George R. Mann, MAI, SRA George N. Vann, Jr., SRA Danny K. Wiley, SRA The following Educational Resources Department staff of the Appraisal Institute also contributed to the completion of these materials: Sue Siradas, Director; Anne Calek, Senior Manager, Classroom Education Program Development and Production; Francine Rosenstein, Manager, Seminar Development; Dawn Martin, Managing Editor, Classroom & Technology-Based Education; Patricia McKibbin, Senior Technical Writer-Editor, Classroom & Technology-Based Education; Brian Blevins, Production Specialist, Classroom Education; and Whitney Youngs, Classroom Education Project Specialist- Editor. Appraisal Institute REO Appraisal i ii Appraisal Institute REO Appraisal Table of Contents Overview................................................................................................................. v Seminar Schedule ................................................................................................... ix SECTION 1 Part 1. Background on Real Estate Owned (REO) Learning Objectives Part 1 ............................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................... 3 Foreclosure Procedure ................................................................................... 5 Parties Involved
    [Show full text]
  • Relocation & Destination Appraisals
    Relocation & Destination Appraisals: Making the Most of a Corporate Transfer Relocation & Destination Appraisals: Making the Most of a Corporate Transfer Just how much is your house worth? Congratulations—you’ve been promoted, but it means relocating to another city! Some of your first thoughts after accepting the new position probably concerned the sale of your present home, and even the purchase of a new home in your next location. When it comes to the sale and purchase of a home, you and your employer will benefit from the services of a professional real estate appraiser. Before you purchase your next home, you’ll want to get the best price for your present home. A detailed relocation appraisal by a qualified real estate appraiser can help you estimate your home’s current market value and determine what price your home will bring on the open market, a move which could greatly improve your chances for a timely, profitable sale. What is a Relocation Appraisal? The value of your home never remains the same. Its value today is probably not the same as when you bought it, and it probably won’t be the same a year from now. As a result, your employer or a relocation company may obtain one or more appraisals to assess the anticipated sales price of your home in connection with your move. Sometimes an average of two or more appraised values is utilized (depending on the company’s policy) and an additional appraisal might be undertaken if there is any significant discrepancy. A relocation appraisal is an estimate of the anticipated sales price at which your home will sell in the current market within a reasonable length of time, based on what appraisers call the sales comparison analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Residential Green and Energy Efficient Addendum
    A Guide to the Residential Green and Energy Efficient Addendum By Sandra K. Adomatis, SRA, LEED Green Associate, NAR GREEN May 2018 Reviewed by Ben Hoen of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 © Appraisal Institute 2018. All Rights Reserved. INTRODUCTION Target Audience The target audience for the Residential Green and Energy Efficient Addendum and this guide includes appraisers, real estate agents, energy and green raters, lenders, builders, the secondary mortgage market, and green/energy organizations. Purpose The Residential Green and Energy Efficient Addendum is gaining market share as a tool to communicate the high performance features of a home. The Addendum is an extension of the new construction builder’s specification sheet and the Uniform Residential Appraisal Report (URAR) Form, Fannie Mae Form 1004/Freddie Mac Form 70, used by the mortgage lending industry. The Addendum is mapped to the Real Estate Standards Organization (RESO) and the Mortgage Industry Standards Maintenance Organization (MISMO) to allow the data to be transferred to the MLS and secondary mortgage market portal. The Addendum may be used as the existing homeowner’s “brag sheet” or description of hidden features that are often overlooked by real estate professionals when documentation like the Addendum is not available. Many new construction specifications do not communicate the high performance features in a meaningful way to appraisers, real estate agents, or the lending world. Completing the Addendum on existing, proposed, or new construction structures and giving it to all parties involved in the transaction, including attaching it to the MLS to enhance marketing, is important. If this data were readily available to all parties, it would result in a smoother transaction, better marketing, and a more credible appraised value.
    [Show full text]