DOCSLIB.ORG

Seismotectonic Study for Taskeech Dam and Reservoir Site, Upalco

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seismotectonic Study for Taskeech Dam and Reservoir Site, Upalco SEISMOTECTONIC STUDY FOR TASKEECH DAM AND RESERVOIR SITE UPALCO UNIT AND UPPER STILLWATER DAM AND RESERVOIR SITE BONNEVILLE UNIT CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT, UTAH Richard A. Martin, Jr. Alan R. Nel son Rodney R. ~eisserl J. Timothy Sullivan Sei smotectonic Report No. 85-22 Seismotectonic Section Geologic Services Branch Division of Geology Engineering and Research Center Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado l~resentl~at Bonnevi 11e Construction Office, Provo, Utah. 2~lthoughthis report was edited and revised slightly during the second half of 1984 and early 1985, the main body of this report, analysis methods, and conclusions were developed and written during 1981 and 1982. Prepared by: Richard A. Martin, Jr. Rodney R. Wei sser3 Seismologist Geologist Alan R. Nelson J. Timothy Sullivan Geologist Geologist Techni cal approval by: Reviewed by: Dean Ostenaa Robert B. MacDonald Head, Seismotectonic Section Chief, Geologic Services Branch Approved by: N. B. Bennett, I11 Date Chief, Division of Geology %resently at Bonnevi lle Construction Office, Provo, Utah. CONTENTS Page Summary of conclusions .................... vi ii 1. Introduction ....................... 1.1 Objectives ...................... 1.2 Scope ........................ 1.3 Acknowledgments ................... 2. Feature Description ................... 2.1 Taskeech Dam and Reservoir .............. 2.1.1 Location and physiography ............ 2.1.2 Proposed construction .............. 2.1.3 Hazard classification .............. 2.2 Upper Stillwater Dam and Reservoir .......... 2.2.1 Location and physiography ............ 2.2.2 Proposed constructi on .............. 2.2.3 Hazard classification .............. Geologic. sei smol ogi c. and tectoni c setting ....... 3.1 Regional geology ................... 3.1.1 Physiography .................. 3.1.2 Stratigraphy .................. 3.1.3 Structure .................... 3.1.3.1 Overthrust belt .............. 3.1.3.2 Uinta anticline .............. 3.1.3.3 Uinta Basin ................ 3.1.3.4 Mountain flank faulting .......... Uinta Basin fault ............ flank^............ 3.1.3.5 Neogene fnreactivat ion ......... 3.2 Site geology ..................... 3.2.1 Taskeech Dam and Reservoir ........... 3.2.1.1 Geologic setting .............. 3.2.1.2 Faulting .................. 3.2.1.3 Landslides ................. 3.2.2 Upper Stillwater Dam and Reservoir ....... 3.2.2.1 Geologic setting .............. 3.2.2.2 Faulting .................. 3.2.2.3 Landslides ................. 3.3 Hi storical sei smi city ................ 3.3.1 Regional sei smi city ............... 3.3.2 Local seismicity ................ 3.3.3 Earthquake focal depths ............. 3.3.4 Earthquake focal mechanisms ........... 3.4 Neotectonics ..................... 3.4.1 Crustal structure ................ 3.4.2 Basin and Range transition zone ......... 3.4.3 Colorado Plateau ................ iii CONTENTS .Continued Page 4 . Seismotectonic investigations .............. 35 4.1 Microseismic investigations ............. 35 4.1.1 Bear Wallow earthquakes ............. 35 4.1.2 Suspected South Flank fault events ....... 45 4.1.3 Southwest events ................ 45 4.1.4 Random events .................. 45 4.2 Geologic investigations ............... 46 4.2.1 Previous mappi ng ................ 46 4.2.2 Objectives ................... 46 4.2.3 Mountain flank faults .............. 47 4.2.3.1 South Flank fault ............. 47 East Grandaddy Mountai n ......... 48 pidge................ 48 enter Park ............... 48 Estimated= of most recent di spl acement 49 4.2.3.2 Uinta Basin fault- .= .......... 49 4.2.4 Faulting at Towanta Flat ............ 49 4.2.4.1 Resistivity survey ............. 50 4.2.4.2 Age of deposits at Towanta Flat ...... 51 4.2.4.3 Trenching of scarps and lineaments ..... 52 52 ..... 54 --- ..... 4.2.4.4 Scar~he1 qhts and recurrence intervals of surface-di spl acements .......... 4.2.4.5 Extent of faulting ............. 4.2.4.6 Other reported faulting along the "Towanta Lineament" ................ 4.2.4.7 Conclusions ................ 4.2.5 Bear Wall ow fault ................ 4.2.6 Other potential seismic source areas ...... 4.2.6.1 Strawberry and Stinking Springs faults ... 4.2.6.2 Little Valley fault ............ 4.2.6.3 Duchesne-Pleasant Valley fault system ... 4.2.6.4 Taskeech ground cracks ........... 5 . Maximum credible earthquakes ......... 5.1 Bear Wall ow fault ............ 5.2 Mountain flank faults .......... 5.3 Wasatch fault .............. 5.4 Strawberry and Stinking Springs faults . 5.5 Other seismic source zones ........ 5.5.1 Towanta Flat faults ......... 5.5.2 Duchesne-Pl easant Val 1ey fault system 5.6 Earthquake recurrence .......... CONTENTS .Continued Page 6 . Conclusions ................... 6.1 Site specific conclusions for Taskeech Dam and Reservoir ................. 6.1.1 Design earthquakes ........... 6.1.2 Slope stability ............. 6.1.3 Reservoir seiche ............ 6.1.4 Liquefaction .............. 6.1.5 Surface faulting ............ 6 .1.6 Reservoi r-i nduced seismicity ...... 6.2 Site specific conclusions for Upper Stillwater Dam and Reservoir ............. 6.2.1 Design earthquakes ........... 6.2.2 Slope stability ............. 6.2.3 Reservoir seiche ............ 6.2.4 Surface faulting ............ 6.2.5 Reservoi r-i nduced sei smi city ...... 7 . Recommendations ..................... 80 8 . References ........................ 81 9 . Appendices ........................ 95 TABLES 3.1 Largest earthquakes in the Utah region. 1850-1981 ... 4.1 Catal og of 1980 microearthquakes ........... 4.2 Stratigraphic units. soils. and fault events with estimated ages and displacements from Towanta Flat trench 1 ...................... 4.3 Scarp heights. estimated number of fault events. and average recurrence intervals for the Towanta Flat graben ................. 6.1 Design earthquakes for Taskeech Dam .......... 6.2 Design earthquakes for Upper Stillwater Dam ...... CONTENTS - Conti nued Page FIGURES Location map of the Taskeech and Upper Stillwater damsites . Geographic map of the Uinta Mountains and Uinta Basin . General ired geologic map of the Uinta Mountains and Uinta Basin in the vicinity of Taskeech and Upper St i11 water damsi tes . Geologic cross section (A-A'; fig. 3.2) of the south flank of the Uinta Mountains and northern Uinta Basin . Generalized tectonic map of the Uinta Mountains . Epicenter map of the largest historical earthquakes in the Utah region, 1850-1978 . Location map of the University of Utah telemetered seismic network as of June 1979 . Epicenter map of the Wasatch Front earthquakes, October 1974 to June 1978. ,. Study area location map and Utah earthquakes, October 1974 to June 1978 . .... Isoseismal map of the September 30, 1977 magnitude 4.5 earthquake near Moon Lake, Utah . Schematic summary of fault plane solutions (lower-hemi sphere projections) for the Utah Region . Composite focal mechanism solution No. 1 for 1980 Bear Wallow microearthquakes No. 58-63, 73, 74, 79-87 Composite focal mechanism solution No. 2 for 1980 Bear Wallow microearthquakes No. 58-63, 73, 74, 79-87 Composite focal mechanism solution for 1980 Bear Wallow microearthquakes No. 15, 21, 24, 42, 48, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 64, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77 . East-west hypocentral cross section (A-A') of selected Bear Wall ow events . Plot of scarp height versus maximum slope angle for scarp profiles . Earthquake magnitude versus frequency of occurrence for the Bear Wallow fault and surrounding area . PLATES Pl ate 1 Historical seismicity 1850-1981 ............in pocket 2 1980 microearthquake epicenters and seismograph station locations .....................,in pocket 3 Quaternary geology of Towanta Flat area ........in pocket 4 Trench log of trench No. 1 ...,...........in pocket 5 Trench log of trench No. 2 ...............in pocket 6 Trench log of trench No. 3 ...............in pocket 7 Geologic maps of portions of the South Flank fault ...in pocket SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS Taskeech and Upper Stillwater damsites are located along the south flank of the Uinta Mountains in north-eastern Utah on the Lake Fork River and Rock Creek, respectively. The proposed Taskeech Dam will be located about 40 km (25 mi) north of the city of Duchesne and is presently planned to be constructed of rolled earthfi 11 to a hei ght of about 68 m (223 ft). The proposed Upper Sti1 lwater Dam will be located about 23 km (14 mi ) west of Taskeech Dam and will be a gravity structure of roller- compacted concrete and be constructed to a height of 82 m (270 ft ). Taskeech and Upper Stillwater damsites lie within the eastern limits of the ISB (Intermountain seismic belt), a north-trending zone of diffuse but locally intense seismicity that extends for over 1300 km (800 mi) from southern Utah to northern Montana. The largest earthquake to have occurred within the ISB during historic times was the M 7.5 Heben Lake, Montana earthquake of 1959. Within Utah, earthquakes as large as M 6.6 have occurred since settlement in 1847. In the region of the damsites, two earthquakes in the magnitude range 4.5 to 5.0 have occurred within 7 km of Taskeech damsite, one in 1950 and another in 1977. The ISB is a1 so characterized by abundant geologic evidence for late Quaternary surface faulting. In central and northeastern Utah, this evidence can be found on the Wasatch, Strawberry, and Stinking Springs faults and on the faults on Towanta Flat near Taskeech damsite. The Wasatch, Strawberry, and Stinking Springs faults are believed to be capable of generating earthquakes in the 6.5 to 7.5 magnitude range with associated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wasatch Fault
    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Goat Unit Management Plan | Wasatch and Central Mountains
    MOUNTAIN GOAT UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Wasatch and Central Mountains Lone Peak / Box Elder Peak / Timpanogos / Provo Peak / Nebo August 2019 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS Lone Peak – Salt Lake County: Boundary begins at the junction of I-15 and I-80 in Salt Lake City; east on I-80 to the Salt Lake-Summit county line; south along this county line to the Salt Lake-Wasatch county line; southwest along this county line to the Salt Lake-Utah county line; southwest along this county line to I-15; north on I-15 to I-80 in Salt Lake City. Box Elder Peak – Utah County: Boundary begins at I-15 and the Salt Lake-Utah county line; east along this county line to the Utah-Wasatch county line; south along this county line to “Pole Line Pass” on the Snake Creek-North Fork American Fork Canyon road; west on this road to SR-92; west on SR-92 to I-15; north on I-15 to the Salt Lake-Utah county line. Timpanogos – Utah County: Boundary begins at the junction of SR-92 and SR-146; southeast on SR-92 to US-189; southwest on US-189 to SR-52; west on SR-52 to US-89; north on US-89 to SR-146; north on SR-146 to SR-92. Provo Peak – Utah County: Boundary begins at the junction of I-15 and US-6 at Spanish Fork; north on I-15 to SR-52; east on SR-52 to US-189; northeast on US-189 to the South Fork Drainage of Provo Canyon; east along this drainage bottom to the Berryport trail; south along this trail to the Left Fork of Hobble Creek road; south on this road to the Right Fork of Hobble Creek road; east on this road to Cedar Canyon; south along this canyon bottom to Wanrhodes Canyon; south along this canyon bottom to Diamond Fork Creek; southwest along this creek to US-6; northeast on US-6 to I-15.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasatch Fault
    WASATCH FAULT NORTHERN POI=ITION Raymond Lundgren WOODWARD· CLYDE ASSOCIATES George E.Hervert & B. A. Vallerga CONSULTING SOIL ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS SAN FRANCISCO - OAKLAND - SAN JOSE OFFICES Wm.T.Black Lloyd S. Cluff Edward Margeson 2730 Adeline Street Keshavan Nair Oakland, Ca 94607 Lewis L.Oriard (415) 444-1256 Mahmut OtU5 C.J.VanTiI P. O. Box 24075 Oaklllnd, ea 94623 July 17, 1970 Project G-12069 Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey 103 Utah Geological Survey Building University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 Attention: Dr. William P. Hewitt Director Gentlemen: WASATCH FAULT - NORTHERN PORTION EARTHQUAKE FAULT INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION The enclosed report and maps presents the results at our investigation and evaluation of the Wasatch fault from near Draper to Brigham City, Utah. The completion of this work marks another important step in Utah's forward-looking approach to minimizing the effects of earthquake and geologic hazards. We are proud to have been associated with the Utah Geological and Mineralogical Survey in completing this study, and we appreciate the opportunity of assisting you with such an inter­ esting and challenging problem. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, {4lJ~ Lloyd S. Cluff Vice President and Chief Engineering Geologist LSC: jh Enclosure LOS ANGELES-ORANGE' SAN DIEGO' NEW YORK-CLIFTON' DENVER' KANSAS CITY-ST. LOUIS' PHILADELPHIA-WASHINGTON Affiliated with MATERIALS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, INC. WASATCH FAULT NORTHERN PORTION EARTHBUAKE FAULT INVESTIGATION & EVALUATION av LLOYO S. CLUFF. GEORGE E. BROGAN & CARL E. GLASS PROPERll Of mAR GEOLOGICAL AND. MINfBAlOGICAL SURVEY A GUIDE·TO LAND USE PLANNING FOR UTAH GEOLOGICAL & MINERALOGICAL SURVEY WOODWARD- CLYDE & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS OAKLAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Tectonics of Utah with Emphasis on Earthquake-Hazard Characterization
    QUATERNARY TECTONICS OF UTAH WITH EMPHASIS ON EARTHQUAKE-HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION by Suzanne Hecker Utah Geologiral Survey BULLETIN 127 1993 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 0 STATE OF UTAH Michael 0. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGSBoard Member Representing Lynnelle G. Eckels ................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................. Civil Engineering Jo Brandt .................................................................................................................. Public-at-Large C. Williatn Berge ...................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Russell C. Babcock, Jr.............................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ............................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ............................................................................................... Economics-Business/Scientific Scott Hirschi, Director, Division of State Lands and Forestry .................................... Ex officio member UGS Editorial Staff J. Stringfellow .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for an Active Shear Zone in Southern Nevada Linking the Wasatch Fault to the Eastern California Shear Zone
    Evidence for an active shear zone in southern Nevada linking the Wasatch fault to the Eastern California shear zone Corné Kreemer, Geoffrey Blewitt, and William C. Hammond Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, and Nevada Seismological Laboratory, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0178, USA ABSTRACT In this study, our aim is to elucidate how present-day localized exten- Previous studies have shown that ~5% of the Pacifi c–North sion is transferred southward and westward from the Wasatch Fault zone America relative plate motion is accommodated in the eastern part by (1) analyzing data from continuous GPS stations, and (2) modeling of the Great Basin (western United States). Near the Wasatch fault the present-day strain rate tensor fi eld based on those GPS velocities and zone and other nearby faults, deformation is currently concentrated additional constraints from earthquake focal mechanisms. Considering the within a narrow zone of extension coincident with the eastern margin limited number of high-quality, long-running geodetic monuments, sig- of the northern Basin and Range. Farther south, the pattern of active nifi cant new insight can only be gained through integration of the comple- deformation implied by faulting and seismicity is more enigmatic. To mentary geodetic and moment tensor data sets. Our results provide new assess how present-day strain is accommodated farther south and insight into the question as to whether strain is being accommodated along how this relates to the regional kinematics, we analyze data from narrow zones separating rigid crustal blocks, such as farther to the north, continuous global positioning system (GPS) stations and model the or in a more diffuse manner, as it has over most of the history of the Basin strain rate tensor fi eld using the horizontal GPS velocities and earth- and Range.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Proceedings
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. ALPINE BIRD COMMUNITIES OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND RESEARcH!/ Clait E. Braun Wildlife Researcher Colorado Division of Wildlife, Research Center, 317 West Prospect Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 ABSTRACT The avifauna of alpine regions of western North America is notably depauperate. Average community size is normally 3 to 4 although 5 species may consistently breed and nest above treeline. Only 1 species is a year around resident and totally dependent upon alpine habitats. Seasonal habitat preferences of the breeding avifauna are identified and the complexity of the processes and factors influencing alpine regions are reviewed. Management problems are discussed and research opportunities are identified. KEYWORDS: alpine ecosystem, habitat, avifauna, management, western North America. INTRODUCTION Alpine ecosystems occur in most of the high mountain cordilleras of western North America. Alpine, as used in this paper, refers to the area above treeline where habitats are characterized by short growing seasons, low temperatures and high winds. The term "tundra" is frequently used to describe these habitats but is more properly used in connection with arctic areas north of the limit of forest growth (Hoffmann and Taber 1967). While use of the terms "alpine tundra" and "arctic tundra" is common in designating above treeline (alpine) and northern lowland areas (arctic), the terminology of Billings (1979) is preferred. Likewise, lumping of alpine and arctic ecosystems into the "tundra biome" (see Kendeigh 1961) is not really feasible because of the extreme differences in radiation, moisture, topography, photo­ period, presence or absence of permafrost, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy
    Old Spanish National Historic Trail Final Comprehensive Administrative Strategy Chama Crossing at Red Rock, New Mexico U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service - National Trails Intermountain Region Bureau of Land Management - Utah This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents i Table of Contents v Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 - Introduction 3 The National Trails System 4 Old Spanish National Historic Trail Feasibility Study 4 Legislative History of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Nature and Purpose of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail 5 Trail Period of Significance 5 Trail Significance Statement 7 Brief Description of the Trail Routes 9 Goal of the Comprehensive Administrative Strategy 10 Next Steps and Strategy Implementation 11 Chapter 2 - Approaches to Administration 13 Introduction 14 Administration and Management 17 Partners and Trail Resource Stewards 17 Resource Identification, Protection, and Monitoring 19 National Historic Trail Rights-of-Way 44 Mapping and Resource Inventory 44 Partnership Certification Program 45 Trail Use Experience 47 Interpretation/Education 47 Primary Interpretive Themes 48 Secondary Interpretive Themes 48 Recreational Opportunities 49 Local Tour Routes 49 Health and Safety 49 User Capacity 50 Costs 50 Operations i Table of Contents Old Spanish National Historic Trail - Final Comprehensive Administrative Stratagy Table of Contents 51 Funding 51 Gaps in Information and
    [Show full text]
  • Biotic Communities of the Southern Wasatch and Uinta Mountains, Utah C
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 6 Article 1 Number 1 – Number 4 11-15-1945 Biotic communities of the southern Wasatch and Uinta Mountains, Utah C. Lynn Hayward Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Hayward, C. Lynn (1945) "Biotic communities of the southern Wasatch and Uinta Mountains, Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 6 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol6/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. .. The Great Basin Naturalist Published by the Department of Zoology and Entomology Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah X'oi.iMK \'\ X()VP:MP.KR 15, 1945 Nos. 1-4 BTOTTC COMMUNITIES OF THE SOUTHERN WASATCH AND UINTA MOUNTAINS, UTAH"' C. T.YXN HAYWARD(^) Associate Professor of Zoology P.rijiham Young University Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2 A. Scope and Nature of Problem 2 B. Methods 4 C. Review of Previous Work 8 IP TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY 9 A. Location and General Topography 9 B. Geological Histor}- 11 C. Glaciation 13 III. CLIMATE 13 A. Gene^^l Climate of Wasatch Mountains 13 P>. Climate of Mt. Timpanogos and L'intas 15 1 Temperature 15 2. Precipitation Pt 3. Relative Humidity 1/ ' 4. Wind 18 5. General Discussion 18 IV. CONCEPTS OF BIOTTC COMMUNITIES 1c> \-.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Alpine Plant Communities Near King's Peak, Uinta Mountains, Utah
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 42 Number 1 Article 3 3-31-1982 Structure of alpine plant communities near King's Peak, Uinta Mountains, Utah George M. Briggs University of Montana, Missoula James A. MacMahon Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Briggs, George M. and MacMahon, James A. (1982) "Structure of alpine plant communities near King's Peak, Uinta Mountains, Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 42 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol42/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. STRUCTURE OF ALPINE PLANT COMMUNITIES NEAR KING'S PEAK, UINTA MOUNTAINS, UTAH George M. Briggs' and James A. MacMahon- Abstract.- a study was made at 18 sites with elevations between 3512 and 3768 m in the Uinta Mountains, Utah. Sites were small in extent but typified vegetation patterns found in the Uintas. Standing crop, species compo- sition (based on dry weight), and values for several physical parameters were determined at each site. Simple linear regressions performed between the various biotic and abiotic characters revealed significant relationships between the characteristics of rocks visible at the surface (the number, size, and variation in size) and vegetation cover. This relationship was probably due to the burial of rocks as a region became vegetated. Bray and Curtis ordinations per- formed on the indicated data that there were several factors which influenced the species composition but that no single factor dictated the vegetational pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoseismologic Investigations of the Hurricane Fault in Northwestern Arizona and Southwestern Utah
    Paleoseismologic Investigations of the Hurricane Fault in Northwestern Arizona and Southwestern Utah Heidi D. Stenner1,3, William R. Lund2, Philip A. Pearthree1, Benjamin L. Everitt4 Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-8 April 1999 Reformatted and revised, May, 2005 1Arizona Geological Survey, 416 W. Congress St. Tucson, AZ 85701 2Utah Geological Survey, Southern Utah Regional Office 3Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287 4Utah Department of Water Resources "Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award number (Arizona Geological Survey, 1434-HQ-97-GR-03047). The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government." TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 ABSTRACT 3 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 6 CHAPTER 2. RECONNAISSANCE PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT IN SOUTHWESTERN UTAH 45 CHAPTER 3. PALEOSEISMOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN ANDERSON JUNCTION SECTION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT, NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA AND SOUTHWESTERN UTAH 81 CHAPTER 4. LATE QUATERNARY FAULTING ON THE WHITMORE CANYON SECTION OF THE HURRICANE FAULT, NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA 99 REFERENCES CITED 106 APPENDICES 2 ABSTRACT We have completed initial paleoseismologic investigations to evaluate the recency and size of paleoearthquakes and long-term slip rates on the Hurricane fault in southern Utah and northern Arizona (SUNA). The Hurricane fault is a long, west-dipping normal fault with substantial late Cenozoic displacement within the structural and seismic transition between the Colorado Plateau and the Basin and Range province. Previous reconnaissance studies of the fault in northern Arizona and southern Utah had documented evidence of late Quaternary activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Areas on the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National
    Wilderness Areas On The Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forests “Wilderness is the land that was wild land beyond the frontier...land that shaped the growth of our nation and the character of its people. Wilderness is the land that is rare, wild places where one can retreat from civilization, reconnect with the Earth, and find healing, meaning and significance.” The United States was the first country to define and create designated wilderness areas. In 1964 the Wilderness Act was passed in congress. The Act describes wilderness as the following: "...lands designated for preservation and protection in their natural condition..." Section 2(a) "...an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man..." Section 2(c) "...an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvement or human habitation..." Section 2(c) "...generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable..." Section 2(c) "...has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation..." Section 2(c) "...shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreation, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation and historic use." Section 4(b) Within the Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forest there are 9 designated wilderness areas. These areas include: Mount Naomi Wilderness, Wellsville Mountain Wilderness, Mount Olympus Wilderness, Twin Peaks Wilderness, Lone Peak Wilderness, Mount Timpanogos Wilderness, Mount Nebo Wilderness, Deseret Peak Wilderness and the High Uinta Wilderness. Each of these areas offer unique wilderness opportunities and experiences. The Mount Naomi Wilderness was designated in 1984 and includes 44,523 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Rock Glaciers in the American West and Their Topography and Climate
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 12-30-2020 Inventory of Rock Glaciers in the American West and Their Topography and Climate Allison Reese Trcka Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Geology Commons, and the Geomorphology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Trcka, Allison Reese, "Inventory of Rock Glaciers in the American West and Their Topography and Climate" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5637. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7509 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Inventory of Rock Glaciers in the American West and Their Topography and Climate by Allison Reese Trcka A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology Thesis Committee: Andrew G. Fountain Chair Adam Booth Martin Lafrenz Portland State University 2020 Abstract Rock glaciers are flowing geomorphic landforms composed of an ice/debris mixture. A uniform rock glacier classification scheme was created for the western continental US, based on internationally recognized criteria, to merge the various regional published inventories. A total of 2249 rock glaciers (1564 active, 685 inactive) and 7852 features of interest were identified in 10 states (WA, OR, CA, ID, NV, UT, ID, MT, WY, CO, NM). Sulfur Creek rock glacier in Wyoming is the largest active rock glacier (2.39 km2).
    [Show full text]