Rain Or Shine
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
15Gardner's Equation for Water Movement To
PRINCIPLES OF SOIL AND PLANT WATER RELATIONS This Page Intentionally Left Blank PRINCIPLES OF SOIL AND PLANT WATER RELATIONS M.B. KIRKHAM Kansas State University AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Publisher: Dana Dreibelbis Editorial Coordinator: Kelly Sonnack Project Manager: Kristin Macek Marketing Manager: Linda Beattie Cover Design: Eric DeCicco Composition: Kolam Text Printer: Vail Ballou Cover Printer: Phoenix Color Elsevier Academic Press 200 Wheeler Road, 6th Floor, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, California 92101-4495, USA 84 Theobald’s Road, London WC1X 8RR, UK This book is printed on acid-free paper. ϱ Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone: (+44) 1865 843830, fax: (+44) 1865 853333, e-mail: [email protected]. You may also complete your request on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://elsevier.com), by selecting “Customer Support” and then “Obtaining Permissions.” Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kirkham, M. B. Principles of soil and plant water relations / M. B. Kirkham. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references -
Least Limiting Water and Matric Potential Ranges of Agricultural Soils with T Calculated Physical Restriction Thresholds Renato P
Agricultural Water Management 240 (2020) 106299 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Agricultural Water Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat Least limiting water and matric potential ranges of agricultural soils with T calculated physical restriction thresholds Renato P. de Limaa,*, Cássio A. Tormenab, Getulio C. Figueiredoc, Anderson R. da Silvad, Mário M. Rolima a Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, 52171-900, Recife, PE, Brazil b Department of Agronomy, State University of Maringá, Av. Colombo, 5790, 87020-900, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil c Department of Soil Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 7712, 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil d Agronomy Department, Goiano Federal Institute, Geraldo Silva Nascimento Road, km 2.5, 75790-000, Urutai, GO, Brazil ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The least limiting water range (LLWR) is a modern and widely used soil physical quality indicator based on Agricultural water management predefined limits of water availability, aeration, and penetration resistance, providing a range ofsoilwater Soil physical restrictions contents in which their limitations for plant growth are minimized. However, to set up the upper and lower Water availability limits for a range of soil physical properties is a challenge for LLWR computation and hence for adequate water management. Moreover, the usual LLWR is given in terms of the soil water content in which only for field capacity and permanent wilting point, the matric potential range is known. In this paper, we present a procedure for calculating LLWR using Genuchten’s water retention curve parameters and introducing the least limiting matric potential ranges of agricultural soils, which we named LLMPR, defined as the range of matric potential for which soil aeration, water availability, and mechanical resistance would not be restrictive to plant growth. -
Quantification of Available Water Content Comparing Standard Methods and the Pedostructure Concept on Four Different Soils A
QUANTIFICATION OF AVAILABLE WATER CONTENT COMPARING STANDARD METHODS AND THE PEDOSTRUCTURE CONCEPT ON FOUR DIFFERENT SOILS A Thesis by JOHN K BLAKE Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Rabi Mohtar Committee Members, Cristine Morgan Ralph Wurbs Erik Braudeau Amjad Assi Head of Department, Robin Autenrieth December 2016 Major Subject: Civil Engineering Copyright 2016 John K Blake ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the pedostructure soil concept to determine the available water within soil. Specifically, the hydro-structural behavior of the soil in the pedostructure is compared to standard methods of determining field capacity and permanent wilting point. The standard methods evaluated are: the FAO texture estimate, Saxon and Rawls’ pedotransfer functions, and the pressure plate method. Additionally, there are two pedostructure methods that are assessed: the water retention curve (WRC) and the soil shrinkage curve (ShC) methods. Three different types of soils were used: 1) Loamy Fine Sand: Undisturbed cores: Millican, Texas, USA; 2) Silty Loam: Reconstituted cores: Versailles soil, France; and 3) Silty clay loam: Reconstituted cores, Rodah Soils, Qatar. The results showed that the water contents at specific water potentials, empirically suggested values, of 330 hPa and 15,000 hPa for estimating the field capacity and permanent wilting point, respectively the three standards methods and the pedostructure WRC method were in relative agreement. On the other hand, the ShC method used transition characteristic points in the shrinkage curve to estimate the field capacity and permanent wilting point and was significantly higher. -
Evaluating Traditional and Modern Laboratory Techniques for Determining Permanent Wilting Point
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports Volume 7 Issue 5 Kansas Field Research Article 10 2021 Evaluating Traditional and Modern Laboratory Techniques for Determining Permanent Wilting Point N. Parker Kansas State University, [email protected] A. Patrignani Kansas State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/kaesrr Part of the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Parker, N. and Patrignani, A. (2021) "Evaluating Traditional and Modern Laboratory Techniques for Determining Permanent Wilting Point," Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports: Vol. 7: Iss. 5. https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.8080 This report is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. Copyright 2021 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. Contents of this publication may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. Brand names appearing in this publication are for product identification purposes only. No endorsement is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products not mentioned. K-State Research and Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Evaluating Traditional and Modern Laboratory Techniques for Determining Permanent Wilting Point Abstract The permanent wilting point is often considered the lower limit for plant available water and can be measured in the laboratory using a pressure plate apparatus (traditional method) or a dewpoint water potential meter (modern method). However, recent evidence suggests substantial discrepancy between the soil moisture at the permanent wilting points derived from these two laboratory techniques. -
The Availability of Soil Moisture to Plants
Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1964 The va ailability of soil moisture to plants Dwane Jay Sykes Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Sykes, Dwane Jay, "The va ailability of soil moisture to plants " (1964). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 3011. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/3011 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64—9288 microfilmed exactly as received SYKES, Dwane Jay, 1938- THE AVAILABILITY OF SOIL MOISTURE TO PLANTS. Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ph.D., 1964 Agriculture, plant culture University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE AVAILABILITY OF SOIL MOISTURE TO PLANTS by Dwane Jay Sykes A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Plant Physiology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. Iowa State University