Times Square Strategies and Contingencies of Preserving Sonic Art

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Times Square Strategies and Contingencies of Preserving Sonic Art Times Square Strategies and Contingencies of Preserving Sonic Art C h a r l e s e p p l e y The author traces the artistic and institutional complexities of preserving t could not provide long-term support. Liaising with agencies C sonic art. He situates these problems in an analysis of the iconic public like the NYC Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) and sound installation Times Square (1977–1992; 2002–present), which the Department of Transportation (DOT) allowed Neuhaus was constructed in an abandoned subway ventilation chamber by sonic ABSTRA artist Max Neuhaus (1939–2009). Next, the author describes how it to create innovative public works like Times Square. How- aided a revitalization of the Times Square district but fell into disrepair ever, the lack of permanent institutional support—prior to and was dismantled in 1992. The author then describes a 2002 the work’s acquisition by the Dia Art Foundation (DAF) in reconstruction that incorporated long-term speculative self-preservation 2002—repeatedly threatened its preservation. Constructed strategies. Finally, the author discusses the acquisition of Times Square in an urban center, Times Square is tethered to a site prone by the Dia Art Foundation, highlighting challenges that circumscribe to—perhaps defined by—change. Indeed, Åsa Stjerna argues preserving sonic art. that Times Square is inscribed with “new codes and mean- ings” that reflect environmental changes to an artwork “in- Max Neuhaus (1939–2009) was a leading figure in the fields tended to be permanent” [7]. This article shows how artistic of postwar experimental music and sonic art, specifically in instability informed Times Square from the outset, discusses the formation of sound installation [1]. Unlike a performed original and subsequent preservation strategies and high- composition that organizes sound in linear time, sound in- lights the complications of producing sonic art in public stallation positions sound in continuous nonlinear space space circumscribed by conflicting institutional authorities with no beginning or ending [2]. Neuhaus—a virtuoso per- and ideologies. cussionist who toured with Karlheinz Stockhausen, Pierre Boulez and John Cage—investigated artistic sound beyond TimeS Square: music following his departure from the concert hall in 1968 ConstruCting an invisible MonuMent (abandoning a “proscenium situation” that organizes people Public monuments typically have a strong visual and physi- into a fixed hierarchy: composer, performer and audience) cal presence. Whether figurative or abstract, a monument [3]. Neuhaus’s live electroacoustic improvisations, antimusi- represents memories or concepts that relate the structure to cal situations and postmusical sound environments negated its location, community or society [8]. Times Square is made such divisions, articulating a sonic practice that invited of sound and has no obvious visual reference, no particular listeners to “listen in [their] own time” [4]. In 1974—while meaning and no plaque (as seen in Fig. 1). The work oper- planning his iconic Midtown Manhattan installation Times ates similarly to other experiments in monumental sculpture Square (1977–1992; 2002–present)—Neuhaus said: “I’m not of the 1970s (e.g. the architectural interventions of Gordon interested in making music exclusively for musicians or mu- Matta-Clark, colossal icons of Claes Oldenburg, barren steel sically initiated audiences. I am interested in making music plates of Richard Serra or sprawling social sculptures of for people” [5]. Christo and Jeanne-Claude) [9]. Times Square complicates However, Neuhaus often spoke of fighting with the “insti- these boundaries further by defining place with an ephem- tutional beast” [6]. His phrase refers to complications derived eral medium [10]. However, sound is a physical process that from interacting with institutions—artistic, municipal and challenges preconceptions of sculptural materiality. Indeed, corporate—on which he relied to produce artworks but that music critic John Rockwell once described Neuhaus’s instal- Charles Eppley (art historian, curator), Department of Art, 2224 Staller Center lations as the “aural equivalent of a visual-arts earthwork” [11]. for the Arts, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5400, U.S.A. Email: <[email protected]>. In this sense, Times Square is a monument to the emergence of sound as a sculptural medium and an anti- monument that See <www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/lmj/-/27> for supplemental files associated with this issue. memorializes its enduring presence. ©2017 ISAST doi:10.1162/LMJ_a_01003 LEONARDO MUSIC JOURNAL, Vol. 27, pp. 21–26, 2017 21 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01003 by guest on 27 September 2021 very special. It is roughly triangular in shape, with a series of tunnels of different lengths leading off one side and [a] small chamber at one end. My preliminary underground survey of the location indicates these chambers have dis- tinctive sound resonances. I find these particular sound qualities extremely interesting [16]. Neuhaus conducted acoustic experiments in the chamber, observing how “each sound inserted into the piece is multi- plied as it circles the loop,” and introduced and manipulated electronic sounds to intensify this acoustic effect: acoustic resonance [17]. Acoustic resonance is a phenomenon whereby a geometri- cal object made from a medium (solid or fluid) amplifies specific natural frequencies when excited by exterior sound or vibration [18]. Every physical material that is able to store energy is resonant once delimited by a geometrical shape (e.g. air in a triangular chamber) and a medium density that de- termines sound wave propagation speed. When Neuhaus’s electronic tones enter the chamber, they pass over hard con- crete surfaces and multiply, amplify and intensify (“circles the loop”), producing an audible rumble at the surface. One hears not simply the sound of oscillators but a combination of tones propagated, amplified and resonated through the chamber. Sound is not amplified on the site but is generated in the site (and is physically, rather than rhetorically, site spe- Fig. 1. Max Neuhaus, Times Square, sound installation at Broadway cific). However, Neuhaus also claimed that his sounds were between 45th and 46th Streets, New York City, 1976. (Photo © Estate of Max Neuhaus) less important than their psychoacoustical and social func- tions: “My focus is not on making sound works which are ex- hibited to people’s ears, but on affecting the way they perceive Times Square is absorbed into its surrounding site, one of a space by adjusting or shifting its sound” [19]. Neuhaus’s the busiest, loudest and most public of spaces in the United States. Its low-pitched droning hum is amplified from a loud- speaker placed in a chamber beneath a nondescript patch of ventilation grates (as seen in Fig. 2) and heard by listeners who walk across its surface. In 1984, Neuhaus described how Times Square “can be walked through and not noticed. The [sonic] threshold . is a crucial factor. I try to find a point . where the [sounds] are at the threshold of being there and not there” [12]. However, the piece is not undetectable. Neuhaus wanted listeners to find his sounds without “making them so obvious that they are forced to find them” [13]. He prompted listeners to engage the site dialectically: Constant electronic drones are contrasted with stilted sounds of traffic, pedestrian banter and industrial noise to enact a dialogue between artistic and nonartistic sound. Neuhaus described Times Square as an “invisible unmarked block of sound” and “an impossibility within its context” [14]. Neuhaus highlighted how the work both affirms and evades material and perceptive boundaries by being present but not seen, heard but not known, underscoring its dualistic physical and psychoacoustical structure. Neuhaus eventually viewed the soundscape—or the preexisting sounds of the lo- cation—as part of the work [15]. However, he was originally interested in the chamber’s unique acoustic space: Fig. 2. Max Neuhaus, Times Square, sound installation at The ventilation chamber itself, where the loudspeakers Broadway between 45th and 46th Streets, New York City, and generating electronics will be located, is acoustically 1976. (Photo © Estate of Max Neuhaus) 22 Eppley, Times Square Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/LMJ_a_01003 by guest on 27 September 2021 primary goal was to affect how space is perceived through the Arts grant, but one council member argued it was “not a sound, not to present sound-in-itself (i.e. subjective listening responsible way to spend the public’s money” [28]. Indeed, rather than objective audition). Neuhaus was mocked publicly as a “Schubert of the subways” [29]. The work was completed in September of 1977 (despite TimeS Square, 1977–1992 mounting pressure from the Rockefeller Foundation to ac- Neuhaus completed Times Square in 1977, but the work was count for expenses) [30]. conceived as early as 1973 [20]. He exhausted financial and Despite Neuhaus’s initial success in producing the work, social capital to conceive, design and implement the project Times Square quickly fell into disrepair and was permanently over four years. Although sometimes characterized as a guer- turned off in 1992. The work endured two recurring problems: rilla artwork, Neuhaus received funding from private and The analog oscillators drifted out of tune, and power was fre- federal grants: $300 from the Creative Artists Public Service quently disconnected by construction, subway vibrations or Program, $4,000 from the National Endowment for the Arts weather phenomena [31]. Neuhaus attempted to purchase a and $4,525 from the Rockefeller Foundation [21]. There were direct power line to the chamber but was rebuked by Con also corporate donations: the New York Telephone Com- Edison, which refused to work on city property. Accordingly, pany (NYTC) provided a service truck (seen in Fig. 3) from which Neuhaus worked. The MTA gave explicit, though inconsistent, approval and offered lim- ited support: a $950 stipend and free rental of the abandoned chamber [22].
Recommended publications
  • For Immediate Release
    For immediate release WARHOL: Monumental Series Make Premiere in Asia Yuz Museum Presents in Shanghai ANDY WARHOL, SHADOWS In collaboration with Dia Art Foundation, New York “I had seen Andy Warhol shows,but I was shocked when seeing more than a hundred of large paintings ! I felt so much respect for Warhol then and I was totally emotional in front of these Shadows: the first time shown as a complete piece as the original concept of Warhol. ” - Budi Tek, founder of Yuz Museum and Yuz Foundation -- -“a monument to impermanence” made by the “King of Pop”; - the most mysterious work of Warhol that offers profound and immersive experiences; - another ground-breaking one-piece work after the Rain Room at Yuz Museum; an important work from the collection of Dia Art Foundation; - Asian premiere after touring world’s top museums New York Dia: Beacon, Paris Museum of Modern Art and Bilbao Guggenheim; - a conversation between 1970s’Shadows and young artists of OVERPOP after 2010 -- Yuz Museum is proud to organize for the first time in Asia, the Chinese premiere of Shadows by Andy Warhol: “a monument to impermanence” (Holland Cotter, New-York Times). Shadows is valued as the most mysterious work by Andy Warhol, the most influential artist of the 20th century, “the King of Pop”, that shows the unknown side of the artist. The exhibition is presented in collaboration with the globally acclaimed Dia Art Foundation, New York. It opens at Yuz Museum, Shanghai on Saturday, 29th October, 2016. In 1978, at age 50, Andy Warhol embarked upon the production of a monumental body of work titled Shadows with the assistance of his entourage at the Factory.
    [Show full text]
  • Blinky Palermo.Pdf
    Blinky Palermo To the People of New York City September 15, 2018–March 9, 2019 Dia:Chelsea 545 West 22nd Street New York City www.diaart.org Blinky Palermo To the People of New York City To the People of New York City is Blinky Palermo’s last work. It was completed in 1976 upon the artist’s return to Germany, following a three-year stay in New York City. The title for this painting in multiple parts is derived from a simple dedication, “To the people of N.Y.C.,” inscribed on the backs of the work’s forty aluminum panels. In scale, size, chromatic variation, and structure, To the People of New York City is unparalleled in the artist’s oeuvre. Palermo died suddenly in 1977 and was never able to oversee a public installation of this work. However, he left detailed instructions for To the People of New York City’s arrangement in the form of sixteen preparatory studies (presented here in an adjacent gallery). The last of these sketches illustrates each of the painted panels in sequential order, providing a codex for this immersive installation. Each of To the People of New York City’s fifteen sections consists of one to four rectilinear metal panels with variable space between the set, such that the distance between the panels of the groupings must be equal to their respective width. Part VI is the only exception to this rule. It includes two panels that directly abut each other to form the illusion of a single panel. The dimensions of the panels fluctuate from about 8¼ by 6¼ inches to 49¼ by 43¼ inches to 39½ by 78¾ inches, so that the installation can be expanded or contracted to be shown in different spaces while maintaining its internal logic.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Neuhaus, R. Murray Schafer, and the Challenges of Noise
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Music Music 2018 MAX NEUHAUS, R. MURRAY SCHAFER, AND THE CHALLENGES OF NOISE Megan Elizabeth Murph University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2018.233 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Murph, Megan Elizabeth, "MAX NEUHAUS, R. MURRAY SCHAFER, AND THE CHALLENGES OF NOISE" (2018). Theses and Dissertations--Music. 118. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/music_etds/118 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Music at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Music by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Primordial Beginnings December 1, 2020 – January 9, 2021
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Robert Smithson Primordial Beginnings December 1, 2020 – January 9, 2021 Galerie Marian Goodman, Paris and Holt/Smithson Foundation are pleased to announce the first exhibition of Robert Smithson at the Gallery, open from December 1, 2020 to January 9, 2021. Born in Passaic, New Jersey, Robert Smithson (1938-73) recalibrated the possibilities of art. For over fifty years his work and ideas have influenced artists and thinkers, building the ground from which contemporary art has grown. Primordial Beginnings will investigate Smithson’s exploration of, as he said in 1972, “origins and primordial beginnings, […] the archetypal nature of things.” This careful selection of works on paper will demonstrate how Smithson worked as, to use his words, a geological agent. He presciently explored the impact of human beings on the surface of our planet. The earliest works are fantastical science-fiction landscape paintings embedded in geological thinking. These rarely seen paintings from 1961 point to his later earthworks and proposals for collaborations with industry. Between 1961 and 1963 Smithson developed a series of collages showing evolving amphibians and dinosaurs. Paris in the Spring (1963) depicts a winged boy atop a Triceratops beside the Eiffel Tower, while Algae Algae (ca. 1961-63) combines paint and collage turtles in a dark green sea of words. For Smithson, landscape and its inhabitants were always undergoing change. In 1969 he started working with temporal sculptures made from gravitational flows and pours, thinking through these alluvial ideas in drawings. The first realized flow was Asphalt Rundown, in October 1969 in Rome, and the last, Partially Buried Woodshed, on the campus of Kent State University in Ohio in January 1970.
    [Show full text]
  • 5X the Impact
    5X THE IMPACT 5X THE AMENITIES 5X THE VIEWS EMBLEMATIC FLAGSHIP OPPORTUNITY FOR A BRAND CROWN LOOKING TO ESTABLISH ITS PRESENCE AT THE MOST ROBUST CROSSROADS BLADE IN NEW YORK CITY OFFICE LOBBY STREET LEVEL FACADE TIMES THE TIMES THE TIMES THE IMPACT POSSIBILITIES EXPERIENCE 1. Over 18,500 sf of high- 1. One million square feet of first- 1. Design will include concourse impact signage and branding class, state-of-the-art office, level subway access allowing for opportunities retail, and hospitality space with a seamless commute from train brand new capital improvements to desk 2. Top of building illuminated underway including first- signage with prominent midtown class arrival sequence, fully 2. Ability to build open and airy visibility redeveloped lobby and best-in- spaces with double and triple class operating efficiencies height ceilings which foster 3. 85ft high-profile blade signage collaboration and innovation visible to high-density pedestrian 2. Flexibility to create multiple and vehicle traffic distinct points of entry 3. Multi-purpose environments to host tenant and public 4. New digital signage interface 3. Fully redesigned and redeveloped programming in order to create along 42nd Street and 7th signage podium, conducive to community across user groups Avenue generating 600,000 streamlined high-impact brand impressions per week experience 4. Proposed rotating art programs to keep spaces engaging, 5. Ultra high-profile corner signage 4. Brand new direct MTA access to spurring inspiration and stretching 75 ft in height N, Q, R, W, S, 1, 2, 3, 7 lines - as conversation well as close walking proximity to Port Authority and additional 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Holt, Sun Tunnels .Pdf
    Nancy Holt Sun Tunnels, 1973–76 Internationally recognized as a pioneering work of Land art, Nancy Holt’s “The idea for Sun Tunnels became clear to me while I was in the desert watching notes Sun Tunnels (1973–76) is situated within a 40-acre plot in the Great Basin the sun rising and setting, keeping the time of the earth. Sun Tunnels can exist 1. Nancy Holt, “Sun Tunnels,” Artforum 15, no. 8 (April 1977), p. 37. 2. Ibid., p. 35. Desert in northwestern Utah. Composed of four concrete cylinders that are only in that particular place—the work evolved out of its site,” said Holt in a 3. Ibid. 18 feet in length and 9 feet in diameter, Sun Tunnels is arranged on the desert personal essay on the work, which was published in Artforum in 1977.1 She floor in an “x” pattern. During the summer and winter solstices, the four tunnels began working on Sun Tunnels in 1973 while in Amarillo, Texas. As her ideas Nancy Holt was born in 1938 in Worcester, Massachusetts, and was raised align with the angles of the rising and setting sun. Each tunnel has a different for the work developed, Holt began to search for a site in Arizona, New Mexico, in New Jersey. In 1960 she graduated from Tufts University in Medford, configuration of holes, corresponding to stars in the constellations Capricorn, and Utah. She was specifically looking for a flat desert surrounded by low Massachusetts. Shortly after, she moved to New York City and worked as an Columba, Draco, and Perseus.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Changing: on Artists, Institutions, and the Social Environment
    i CLIMATE CHANGING CLIMATE WHY CAN’T YOU TELL ME SCORE WHAT YOU NEED Somewhere our body needs party favors attending sick and resting temperatures times hot unevens twice I ask myself all the time too ward draw pop left under right Just try and squeeze me. Pause. What would you do? Fall down off my feet and try waking tired ex muses Like, you either know I can and work on it with me Or know I can’t and wouldn’t want your baby to go through what I have to go through Over prepared for three nights. Over it all scared for three nights. Tell me the unwell of never been better. Are we still good? Are we still good? TABLE OF CONTENTS Director’s Foreword 4 Johanna Burton A Climate for Changing 6 Lucy I. Zimmerman On Chris Burden’s Wexner Castle 10 Lucy I. Zimmerman Notes on Chris Burden’s Through the Night Softly 15 Pope.L WE LEFT THEM NOTHING 17 Demian DinéYazhi´ Untitled 21 Jibade-Khalil Huffman Scores 1, 3, 13, 23, 27, 50 Park McArthur and Constantina Zavitsanos Questioning Access 25 Advisory Committee Roundtable Discussion Artists in the Exhibition 29 Acknowledgments 47 3 BLANKET (STATEMENT) SCORE Why can’t you just tell me what you need DIRECTOR’S FOREWORD 4 Johanna Burton, Executive Director Opening in the first month of 2021 (or at least set to committee’s roundtable discussion further explores, open then at the time of this writing), Climate Changing: the exhibition intends not to inventory nor propose On Artists, Institutions, and the Social Environment solutions for these considerable challenges, but rather comes at a time of great uncertainty for cultural or- to provide artists a forum for bringing the issues into ganizations.
    [Show full text]
  • From Music to Sound: Being As Time in the Sonic Arts Christoph Cox
    From Music to Sound: Being as Time in the Sonic Arts Christoph Cox In the summer of 1979, The Kitchen, New York’s center for the experimental arts, mounted a festival titled “New Music, New York.” 1 The week-long program presented performances by Philip Glass, Meredith Monk, Tony Conrad, George Lewis, Michael Nyman and others, and marked the coming-of-age of minimalist and experimental music.2 In the Spring of 2004, The Kitchen and a host of other New York arts institutions celebrated the 25th anniversary of that event with a festival titled “New Sound, New York,” billed as “a citywide festival of performances, installations and public dialogues featuring new works by sound artists who are exploring fresh connections among music, architecture and the visual arts.”3 The shift in title—from music to sound—is emblematic. For, over the past quarter century, “sound” has gradually displaced “music” as an object of cultural fascination. Not only has “sound art” become a prominent field of practice and exhibition, embraced by museums and galleries across the globe. The academy has also witnessed an explosion of interest in auditory history and anthropology led by social scientists who have turned their attention to sound as a marker of temporal and cultural difference.4 Within the field of music itself, composers, producers, and improvisers have become increasingly attracted to the broader sonic domains against which music has always defined itself: noise, silence, and non- musical sound. It is common to think of music as a subcategory of sound. According to this view, sound encompasses the entire domain of auditory phenomena, while music is a narrower domain delimited by some selection and organization of sounds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966-1976 David Allen Chapman Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) Spring 4-27-2013 Collaboration, Presence, and Community: The Philip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966-1976 David Allen Chapman Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Part of the Music Commons Recommended Citation Chapman, David Allen, "Collaboration, Presence, and Community: The hiP lip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966-1976" (2013). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 1098. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1098 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Music Dissertation Examination Committee: Peter Schmelz, Chair Patrick Burke Pannill Camp Mary-Jean Cowell Craig Monson Paul Steinbeck Collaboration, Presence, and Community: The Philip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966–1976 by David Allen Chapman, Jr. A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 St. Louis, Missouri © Copyright 2013 by David Allen Chapman, Jr. All rights reserved. CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In 1979, the Museum of Modern Art in New York Presented a Modest
    In 1979, the Museum of Modern Art in New York presented a modest exhibition called “Sound Art.” The museum’s small media art gallery could only accommodate one artwork at a time, so the three works in the show, by Maggi Payne, Connie Beckley, and Julia Heyward, took turns on display. “‘Sound art’ pieces are more closely allied to art than to music, and are usually presented in the museum, gallery, or alternative space,” the exhibition’s curator, Barbara London, said in a statement at the time. In essence, London had helped define a medium that was newly emergent back then, but her explanation offered few parameters—which was exactly the point. Anything aural— radio art, spoken word poetry, the chiming of clocks, even silence itself—was game. The 1983 show “Sound/Art” at the SculptureCenter in New York City helped expand the canon of sound artists, and since then, new technologies have brought in new artists, who have helped make the medium one of the defining ones for right now. Below, a look back at 11 essential sound artworks. Luigi Russolo, Gran Concerto Futuristico (1917) Luigi Russolo is may be best known as a painter associated with the Futurist movement in Italy, but he’s also considered one of the first experimental noise artists, if not the very first one altogether. He invented and built acoustic noise-generating devices called Intonarumori (meaning “noise makers” in Italian) inspired by the factory clatter and the booming of guns from World War I. In 1913, he released the manifesto The Art of Noises, in which he argued that the evolution of the urban industrial soundscape has necessitated new approaches to music.
    [Show full text]
  • New Year's Eve 2012
    New Year’s Eve 2012 A guide what to do and all the hottest places to go! As 2012, the New Year, is quickly approaching, many of you probably want to get a head start on planning your night out in NYC. Spending your New Year's Eve in New York is more than just as celebration or a party, it's a longstanding tradition that links you with the million plus people who come to celebrate New Year's Eve in the City That Never Sleeps. Schedule of Events in Time Square On New Years Eve 4:00 p.m. The Revelers Revelers start arriving late in the afternoon on New Year's Eve. By approximately 4:00 p.m., the Bow Tie of Times Square (42nd to 47th Sts. between Broadway & 7th Ave.) is fully closed to traffic. Revelers are directed by the NYPD to gather in separate viewing sections. As one section fills up, the revelers are directed by police to the next viewing section. As the evening progresses, revelers continue to fill the Times Square neighborhood along Broadway and Seventh Avenue moving uptown from 43rd Street to as far as Central Park. 6:00 p.m. to 6:03 p.m. Opening Ceremonies - Lighting and Raising the Times Square New Year’s Eve Ball The celebration begins with the lighting and raising of the New Year’s Eve Ball atop One Times Square. The Event Organizers, Tim Tompkins and Jeffrey Straus will be joined by representatives of the Philips Lighting Company to flip the giant switch which lights the New Year’s Eve Ball and begins its ascent accompanied by special pyrotechnic effects atop One Times Square.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Square Park: Struggles and Debates Over Urban Public Space
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2017 Washington Square Park: Struggles and Debates over Urban Public Space Anna Rascovar The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2019 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] WASHINGTON SQUARE PARK: STRUGGLES AND DEBATES OVER URBAN PUBLIC SPACE by ANNA RASCOVAR A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2017 © 2017 ANNA RASCOVAR All Rights Reserved ii Washington Square Park: Struggles and Debates over Urban Public Space by Anna Rascovar This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Date David Humphries Thesis Advisor Date Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Washington Square Park: Struggles and Debates over Urban Public Space by Anna Rascovar Advisor: David Humphries Public space is often perceived as a space that is open to everyone and is meant for gatherings and interaction; however, there is often a great competition over the use and control of public places in contemporary cities. This master’s thesis uses as an example Washington Square Park, which has become a center of contention due to the interplay of public and private interests.
    [Show full text]