DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Illegally Built Objects and Illegal Development in Montenegro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dr Chrysi Potsiou Surveying Engineer ASSISTANT PROFESSOR NTUA Email:[email protected] Study on Illegally Built Objects and Illegal Development in Montenegro by Dr Chrysi Potsiou January 31, 2012 Illegally Built Objects and Illegal Development Chrysi Potsiou 2 Illegally Built Objects and Illegal Development Chrysi Potsiou TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………….. 4 1. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………… 21 2. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ……………………………………………. 23 3. ILLEGAL DEVELOPMENT IN MONTENEGRO ………………………… 24 3.1 Country Background and State-of-the-art of Illegal Development …….. 24 3.1.1 General Information …………………………………………….. 24 3.1.2 Illegal Urban Development – History, Causes, Statistics, Types 30 3.2 Brief historic Review of Land Administration, Real Property Taxation and Planning Regulatory framework …...……………………………… 46 3.2.1 Security of tenure and Property registration ……………………. 46 3.2.2 Real property taxation …………………………………………... 52 3.2.3 Real Estate Market and illegal buildings ……………………….. 53 3.2.4 Spatial Planning and construction permitting …………………... 55 3.3 Impact of Illegal Development on the Society, the Environment and the Economy ……………………………………………………………….. 62 3.3.1 Social and Environmental impact ………………………………. 62 3.3.2 Economic impact ……………………………………………….. 67 4 CURRENT TRENDS AND TOOLS FOR ADDRESSING ILLEGAL DEVELOPMENT ……………………………………………………………. 69 4.1 The case of Albania ……………………………………………………. 75 4.2 The case of Greece ………………………………………………........... 78 4.3 The case of the FY Republic of Macedonia ……………………………. 84 4.4 The case of Cyprus ………………………………………………........... 90 4.5 Seismic vulnerability controls ………………………………….............. 94 4.6 Experience from urban integration in areas with Roma settlements …... 101 4.6.1 European Policies ……………………………………………….. 102 4.6.2 Experience from Roma in Greece ………………………………. 104 5 LEGALIZATION OPTIONS CONSIDERED BY THE RELEVANT AUTHORITIES OF MONTENEGRO – COMMENTS AND PROPOSALS 107 REFERENCES ……………………………………………………………… 119 APPENDIX A ……………………………………………………………….. 123 APPENDIX B ……………………………………………………………….. 128 3 Illegally Built Objects and Illegal Development Chrysi Potsiou EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The current Study on Illegally Built Objects and Illegal Development in Montenegro is compiled for the Statens Kartwerk. The objectives of the study are to: 1. Provide an in-depth analysis of the situation (origin, causes, impacts, size of the problem, type) of informal development in Montenegro. 2. Investigate the policy framework and the strategies (housing policies, access to land and ownership) and tools (property registration and planning systems, legislation for legalization / upgrading) used for the legal integration and the environmental upgrading of informal urban development, and practices (citizen participation, penalties, fees, demolition, monitoring of environmentally sensitive areas) to improve transparency and prevent future informal development, eliminate the impacts and improve the livelihood of urban poor and low income people living in informal houses. 3. Give recommendations for improvements and solutions, in order to facilitate growth through the operation of efficient, transparent, and formal land market and safeguard the environment. This activity should develop public and transparent policy and directions on improvement of the legislation and the current situation in relation to the process of identification and the process of legalization/treatment of the illegal buildings in Montenegro, and should provide other countries with useful knowledge and better understanding of the complex informal development issues. In brief, the research has identified the following: Montenegro is a country of special natural beauty that is recognized by its Constitution as an “ecological” country. Natural and cultural beauty of Montenegro attracts tourism and international real estate market interest. In the territory of Montenegro, destructive earthquakes were often related to large movements of rocks (land-slides, erosion of rocks), floods, avalanches, regional fires and other natural hazards. The various ethnic groups of Montenegro are: Montenegrins (Crnogorci) 43%, Serbs (Srbi) 32%, Bosniaks (Bošnjaci) 8%, Albanians (Albanci - Shqiptarët) 5%, and other 12% which include Muslims (Muslimani), Croats (Hrvati), and Roma; according to UN reports, Roma are the most marginalized ethnic minority in Montenegro. Improving the plight of Roma is one of the toughest challenges faced by the country. During 1993, two thirds of the Montenegrin population lived below the poverty line. Currently, the economy of Montenegro is service-based and is in late transition to a market economy. Tourism is an important contributor to Montenegrin economy and government expenditures on infrastructure improvements are largely targeted towards that goal. Montenegro has experienced a real estate boom in 2006 and 2007, with wealthy Russians, Britons and others buying property on Montenegrin coast. Montenegro received, as of 2008, more foreign investment per capita than any other nation in Europe. However, there are significant differences in the extent of poverty in the region between the northern and other parts of the country. 4 Illegally Built Objects and Illegal Development Chrysi Potsiou The “first generation” of informal development in the area is dated since the era of socialism. In the former Yugoslavia land was under state control. Despite the ambitious social housing projects there has always been a lack of state funds for housing purposes. This need was increased due to the natural disasters that happened in the region. Since mid-90’s huge changes have had an impact on the urban development of Montenegro. After the independence a combination of major reasons, such as poverty, internal and external migration as an impact of wars and sanctions on the state economy, no clear property rights, no credit system, and the out-dated centrally driven and bureaucratic planning (with no public participation), created a boost of illegal settlements in Montenegro. Displaced people and refugees have moved in. The “self-made” housing solution, built on state land, acted as the only alternative to inadequate state social and/or affordable housing. According to the UN ECE report of 2006, single-family houses are predominant in Montenegro; apartment buildings are generally considered to be problematic in terms of management and maintenance; over 6000 households, many of which are Roma, live in substandard dwellings (slums). Most of the new housing is illegally constructed. Informal settlements in Montenegro are a dominant feature of urban development; more than 80% of the houses and apartments in Montenegro fall under the term “illegal”, either constructed completely without a building permit on state land and/or beyond the specifications of the permit. Illegal objects are located in all types of land (private or state land); they vary in terms of standard (from slums to luxurious residences), location (from suburbs to city cores and protected areas), use (from residential, mixed, or commercial) and size (from several small units to over 70 ha settlements; from small guesthouses to large hotels). There are no reliable estimates available about the total number of illegally built objects in the country. According to unofficial data the number of informal structures is 130,000 (source: UNDP) and they are mainly concentrated in small and medium settlements all over the territory. The identified causes of illegally built objects in Montenegro vary but in general they are a result of one of the following conditions: 1. internal and external migration as an impact of wars and sanctions on the state economy, poverty and inadequacy of the social housing; lack of access to affordable land and housing; 2. emergency response to housing needs due to natural disasters (earthquake); 3. inability and unwillingness to pay communal taxes; 4. complicated procedure for refugees and the various minorities to obtain citizenship and land use/ownership rights on land; 5. inefficient administration; 6. unclear situation for privatization of land to the citizens and delay in the restitution of property rights; 7. incomplete cadastral maps, no available information about the registered private property rights; 8. lack of affordable housing policy; 9. out-dated centrally driven and bureaucratic planning (with no public participation and no respect of existing private property rights); lack of detailed city plans; lack of serviced urban land; state controlled and extremely bureaucratic planning that aims to “control” development through numerous 5 Illegally Built Objects and Illegal Development Chrysi Potsiou field inspections instead of purely facilitating growth; lack of funds; lack of personnel; expensive and cumbersome procedures for building permits; 10. weak professional ethics; 11. misuse of power; speculation and corruption; 12. ignorance of existing regulations; 13. local and international market pressure. Land Administration The fiscal Inventory Cadastre, established in the 1950’s, provided records of self- declared information -about parcel area- by the “current possessors”, not accompanied by any documentation or map and not checked by the authorities for correctness. Since 1958, the state nationalized all urban lands; the state took ownership rights from the owners and offered them rights to use the houses. The Land Cadastre, in 1976, provided improved information about parcels and their owners and users/social owners related
Recommended publications
  • A Case Study on Stopping Illegal Construction in Kosovo

    A Case Study on Stopping Illegal Construction in Kosovo

    How to Clean Up a City – a Case Study on Stopping Illegal Construction in Kosovo Commandment number 2 in promising to combat corruption in a small, developing country is to have a long-term, strategic plan. But perhaps that was not important because the newly elected Mayor of Prishtina, Shpend Ahmeti, might have not thought of commandment number 1, which is that there is a possibility that someone will kill you for undertaking this endeavor. In 2000, just after the war in Kosovo ended, Rexhep Luci, the city planning director working for the UN, was shot six times and killed because he was trying to stop the illegal constructions that had already become a problem in the capital city.[1] This murder case has still not been resolved. 15 years later, Mayor Ahmeti campaigned for mayor by promising to restore the faith of the residents of Prishtina in local governance and rule of law. Among his promises, including 24/7 water supply and a modern urban transport that would replace the old buses of former Yugoslavia, the soon-to-be Mayor pledged to deal with the illegal construction that had overtaken Kosovo’s capital city’s landscape. Five months into his mandate, an assassination plan against him was exposed; his plans to regulate construction in the capital city did not fit well with large companies that had been profiting off this unregulated landscape mess. That did not stop Mayor Ahmeti from waging a war against the illegal construction, as he had promised during the campaign. Overbuilding in Peace After the war in 1999, construction became the most profitable business of choice by large businesses.
  • Prijedlog Odluke O Osnivanju Biznis Zona U Opštini Bijelo Polje

    Prijedlog Odluke O Osnivanju Biznis Zona U Opštini Bijelo Polje

    CRNA GORA KOMISIJA ZA KONTROLU DRŽAVNE POMOĆI Broj: 01 – 21/3 Podgorica, 07. maj 2018. Godine Na osnovu člana 41 Zakon o kontroli državne pomoći ("Službeni list CG", br. 12/18), a u vezi člana 10 stav 1, tačka 1 i člana 19 stav 3 Zakon o kontroli državne pomoći ("Službeni list CG" br. 74/09 i 54/11) i člana 18 stav 2 ZUP-a ("Službeni list CG", br. 56/14, 20/15, 10/16 i 37/17), Komisija za kontrolu državne pomoći, na sjednici održanoj 07. maja 2018. godine, donijela je RJEŠENJE Predlog Odluke o osnivanju biznis zona “Nedakusi”, “Cerovo”, “Vraneška dolina”, “Bistrička dolina”, “Rakonje – Ravna Rijeka” i “Ribarevine – Poda” u Opštini Bijelo Polje, ocijenjen je kao usklađen sa Zakonom o kontroli državne pomoći. OBRAZLOŽENJE Opština Bijelo Polje (Služba menadžera biznis zona) je, u cilju usklađivanja Odluke o proglašenju biznis zona “Nedakusi”, “Cerovo”, “Vraneška dolina” i “Bistrička dolina”, (“Službeni list CG” – opštinski propisi, br. 32/13 i 04/15) i Odluke o olakšicama za privredne društva i preduzetnike koji posluju u okvitu biznis zona “Nedakusi”, “Cerovo”, “Vraneška dolina” i “Bistrička dolina”, (“Službeni list CG” – opštinski propisi, br. 28/15), sa novom Uredbom o biznis zonama (“Službeni list CG”, br. 77/16 i 38/17), svojim dopisom broj 16- 3516 od 11.04.2018. godine, dostavila Komisiji za kontrolu državne pomoći (u daljem tekstu: Komisija), potpuno novi Predlog Odluke (kojom je pored navedenih biznis zona predloženo osnivanje još dvije nove biznis zone i to: “Rakonje – Ravna Rijeka” i “Ribarevine – Poda”), na ocjenu usklađenosti sa pravilima državne pomoći. Nakon dobijanja predmetnog dokumenta, Komisija je svojim dopisom 01-21/2 od 13.
  • Maloprodajni Objekti Izbrisani Iz Evidencije

    Maloprodajni Objekti Izbrisani Iz Evidencije

    Broj rješenja pod Naziv privrednog društva Sjedište Naziv maloprodajnog objekta Adresa maloprodajnog objekta Sjedište Datum do kojeg kojim je izdato privrednog maloprodajnog je važilo odobrenje društva objekta odobrenje 1-50/3/1-1 D.O.O.LEMIKO - IMPEX Ulcinj Restoran - Miško desna obala rijeke Bojane Ulcinj 14.11.2020. 1-50/4-1 D.O.O.Gitanes - export Nikšić Prodavnica Podgorički put bb - Straševina Nikšić 10.04.2016. 1-50/4/1-1 D.O.O.J.A.Z. Berane Kiosk Mojsija Zečevića bb Berane 14.04.2018. 1-50/5-1 D.O.O. Trio trade company Podgorica Kiosk - Trio 1 Vasa Raičkovića bb (objekat br.21, lok.br.21) Podgorica 10.04.2010. 1-50/5/1-1 D.O.O.Francesković Tivat Lounge bar - Restoran VOLAT Šetalište Iva Vizina br. 15 Tivat 12.03.2015. 1-50/5-2 D.O.O. Trio trade company Podgorica Kiosk - Trio 2 Vasa Raičkovića bb (objekat br.21,lok.br.21) Podgorica 10.04.2010. 1-50/6-1 D.O.O. Mamić Nikšić Prodavnica Duklo bb Nikšić 10.04.2012. 1-50/6/1-1 D.O.O.Sikkim Podgorica Restoran - kafe bar Mantra Ivana Milutinovića br. 21 Podgorica 13.03.2015. 1-50/7-1 A.D.Beamax Berane Prodavnica M.Zečevića br. 1 Berane 04.07.2011. 1-50/7/1-1 D.O.O.Rastoder company Podgorica Prodavnica Isidora Sekulića br.45 Podgorica 14.03.2015. 04-1-300/1-19 "HUGO" d.o.o. Podgorica Kafe bar HUGO Bokeška ulica br.10 Podgorica 29.05.2021.
  • Poglavlje a • PRIRODNA SREDINA

    Poglavlje a • PRIRODNA SREDINA

    GENERALNI URBANISTIČKI PLAN BIJELO POLJE IZMJENE I DOPUNE S A D R Ž A J TEKSTUALNI DIO PLANA 1. POSTOJEĆE STANJE 07 PRIRODNA SREDINA ............................................................................................................... 07 ZELENILO I ZELENE POVRŠINE.............................................................................................. 11 SAOBRAĆAJ – POSTOJEĆE STANJE................................................................................................... 12 HIDROTEHNIČKA INFRASTRUKTURA - POSTOJEĆE STANJE.......................................... 12 KANALIZACIJA ZA OTPADNE VODE - POSTOJEĆE STANJE.............................................. 12 KANALIZACIJA ZA ATMOSFERSKE VODE - POSTOJEĆE STANJE.................................... 13 ELEKTROENERGETSKA MREŽA - POSTOJEĆE STANJE.................................................... 13 TELEFONSKA MREŽA - POSTOJEĆE STANJE ..................................................................... 14 2. EKONOMSKO-DEMOGRAFSKA ANALIZA 15 STANOVNIŠTVO ....................................................................................................................... 15 EKONOMSKA STRUKTURA STANOVNIŠTVA........................................................................ 18 3. RAZVOJ NASELJA 22 RAZVOJ DO XIX VJEKA............................................................................................................ 22 RAZVOJ NASELJA U XIX VJEKU I NA POČETKU XX VJEKA................................................. 22 RAZVOJ NASELJA IZMEĐU DVA RATA.................................................................................
  • Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at Its 37Th Session (Phnom Penh, 2013)

    Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at Its 37Th Session (Phnom Penh, 2013)

    World Heritage 37 COM WHC-13/37.COM/20 Paris, 5 July 2013 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE World Heritage Committee Thirty-seventh session Phnom Penh, Cambodia 16 - 27 June 2013 DECISIONS ADOPTED BY THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE AT ITS 37TH SESSION (PHNOM PENH, 2013) Table of content 2. Requests for Observer status ................................................................................ 3 3A. Provisional Agenda of the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee (Phnom Penh, 2013) ......................................................................................................... 3 3B. Provisional Timetable of the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee (Phnom Penh, 2013) ......................................................................................................... 3 5A. Report of the World Heritage Centre on its activities and the implementation of the World Heritage Committee’s Decisions ................................................................... 4 5B. Reports of the Advisory Bodies ................................................................................. 5 5C. Summary and Follow-up of the Director General’s meeting on “The World Heritage Convention: Thinking Ahead” (UNESCO HQs, 2-3 October 2012) ............................. 5 5D. Revised PACT Initiative Strategy............................................................................ 6 5E. Report on
  • Cover Page RZS.Cdr

    Cover Page RZS.Cdr

    REPUBLIKA CRNA GORA Zavod za statistiku REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO Statistical Office Popis stanovništva, domaæinstava i stanova u 2003. S T A N O V N I Š T V O NACIONALNA ILI ETNIÈKA PRIPADNOST Podaci po naseljima i opštinama Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2003 P O P U L A T I O N NATIONAL OR ETHNIC AFFILIATION Data by settlements and municipalities 11 Podgorica, septembar 2004. REPUBLIKA CRNA GORA REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO Zavod za statistiku Statistical Office Popis stanovništva, domaćinstava i stanova u 2003. S T A N O V N I Š T V O NACIONALNA ILI ETNIČKA PRIPADNOST Podaci po naseljima i opštinama Census of Population, Households and Dwellings 2003 P O P U L A T I O N NATIONAL OR ETHNIC AFFILIATION Data by settlements and municipalities 11 Podgorica, septembar 2004. Izdaje: Published by: Zavod za statistiku Statistical Office of the Republic of Republike Crne Gore Montenegro IV Proleterske 2, Podgorica IV Proleterske 2, Podgorica Za izdavača: For the publisher: Ilija Stanišić, Director Ilija Stanišić, Director Glavni i odgovorni urednik: Editor-in-chief: Rajko Laković Rajko Laković Štampa: Printed by: Štamparija: Printing firm: Tiraž: Copies printed: 400 primjeraka 400 P R E D G O V O R U ovoj knjizi Zavod za statistiku Crne Gore objavljuje konačne rezultate popisa o nacionalnoj ili etničkoj pripadnosti stalnog stanovništva Republike Crne Gore, prema stanju na dan 31.oktobra 2003.godine. Podaci su iskazani po opštinama i naseljima, i to prema važećem administrativno-teritorijalnom stanju na dan 1.januar 2003.godine. U okviru Republike navedene su opštine prema azbučnom redosledu i tipu naselja, a u okviru svake opštine sva njena naselja prema azbučnom redosledu.
  • CBCGDF's Efforts in Biodiversity Conservation CONNENTS

    CBCGDF's Efforts in Biodiversity Conservation CONNENTS

    China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation: Efforts to Conserve Biodiversity (a draft on Mar 2019) CBCGDF’s Efforts in Biodiversity Conservation CONNENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Sustainable communities: Community Conservation Area for (CCAfa) ...................................................................... 3 2. Conserve Biodiversity Via Environmental Public Interest Litigations (EPIL) ............................................................... 4 Typical Case: Acer Pentaphyllum – China’s first EPIL to protected an Endangered Plant ................................ 4 Typical Case: Environmental Public Interest Litigation filed by CBCGDF to Safeguard General Public's Free Passage and Rights of Enjoying Beautiful Environment" Accepted by Local Court ........................................... 5 Typical Case: Tengger Desert Pollution ...................................................................................................................................... 6 XINHUA News Report: China's desert pollution case settled by mediation .............................................. 6 ELI’s news report: A Key Victory for Citizen Suits in China ................................................................................ 7 ChinaDaily Reports: Tengger case shows even big firms can't escape penalty for polluting .............
  • Faa Section 119 Biodiversity Assessement Update for Serbia And

    Faa Section 119 Biodiversity Assessement Update for Serbia And

    FAA SECTION 119 BIODIVERSITY ASSESSEMENT UPDATE FOR SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Prepared by: Alicia P. Grimes USAID Bureau for Economic Growth Agriculture and Trade/Office of Natural Resources Management/Forestry Team/Natural Resources Management Specialist and E&E Liaison, Washington, D.C. Mohammad A. Latif, P.E. REA USAID Europe and Eurasia Bureau (E&E)/Regional Environmental Officer, Washington, D.C. Jelena Vujadinovic-Colic ACDI/VOCA /Environmental Officer; Biodiversity Specialist-Serbia Vasilije Buskovic, M.Sc. Institute for Nature Protection and Consultant Biodiversity Specialist, Montenegro Submitted to: Michelle Stern, Program Office (Copies to: Mark Pickett, Vladan Raznatovic, & Michael Boyd) USAID/Serbia-Montenegro September 8, 2005 Biodiversity 119 Assessment 2005 Update: Serbia/Montenegro Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 PART I. REPUBLIC OF SERBIA A. Importance of Biodiversity and Actions Necessary for Conservation 2 1. Importance of Biodiversity and Critical Habitats 2 2. Threats to Biodiversity 3 a. direct threats/impacts b. threats due to institutional /legal and socio-economic factors 3. Conservation Actions undertaken by Host Country, Civil Society, Donors 6 4. Conclusion: Actions Necessary To Conserve Biodiversity 10 PART II. REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO A. Importance of Biodiversity and Actions Necessary for Conservation 13 1. Importance of Biodiversity and Critical Habitats 13 2. Threats to Biodiversity 13 a. direct threats/impacts b. threats due to institutional /legal and socio-economic factors 3. Conservation Actions undertaken by Host Country, Civil Society, Donors 17 4. Conclusion: Actions Necessary To Conserve Biodiversity 20 PART III. EXTENT TO WHICH USAID ACTIONS CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEEDS IDENTIFIED IN SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO A. Current/On Going Programs 23 B. Future Programming 25 C.
  • Eating up the Amazon

    Eating up the Amazon

    GREENPEACE EATING UP THE AMAZON April 6, 2006 An ongoing investigation by Netherlands-based Greenpeace International of Brazil’s booming soy industry uncovers new evidence linking U.S. multinationals to deforestation, land theft, and slavery in the Amazon. By building soy silos and terminals at the rainforest edge, funding the paving of illegal roads, and buying soy from illegally cleared and operated farms, including farms with a documented record of slave labor, Cargill, ADM and Bunge are both spurring and profiting from the soy plunder of the Amazon. Executive Summary The Amazon rainforest is one of the richest and most biologically diverse regions on the planet—home to nearly ten percent of all known mammals and fifteen percent of terrestrial plants. It is also among the world’s most threatened ecosystems, vanishing at a rate of nearly 7,000 mi2 per year. In the last 25 years, an area of ancient forest larger than California has been lost forever from the Amazon. In recent years, the Brazilian Government has taken important steps to combat illegal logging and other causes of Amazon deforestation. At the same time, a significant new threat has emerged at the forefront of Amazon destruction: the soybean. Massive investments by U.S. agribusiness have made the Amazon forest Brazil’s newest agricultural frontier. By 2004, nearly three million acres of rainforest had been converted to soy agriculture. Although this represents only five percent of the total area currently under soy production in Brazil, and many older soy plantations were converted from already deforested ranchlands, new investments in roads, silos and frontier ports by Cargill and others are making it more profitable to burn virgin forest than buy already cleared land, and driving soy’s expansion into the Amazon at an ever faster pace.
  • (OGM 5/16 and 51/17), Article 7 of Th

    (OGM 5/16 and 51/17), Article 7 of Th

    Montenegro Energy Regulatory Agency Pursuant to Article 68 paragraph 1 of the Energy Law (OGM 5/16 and 51/17), Article 7 of the Rules on Certification of Transmission System Operators (OGM 50/2016) and Article 12 paragraph 1 item 6 of the Statute of the Energy Regulatory Agency (OGM 15/16), acting in the decision-making procedure in respect of the Request for certification of the Crnogorski Elektroprenosni Sistem AD Podgorica (Montenegro Electrical Transmission System JSC Podgorica), number 6788 dated 20 June 2017, the Board of the Agency, at its session held on 20 October 2017, adopted an interim D E C I S I O N 1. Joint stock company Crnogorski Elektroprenosni Sistem, with registered office in Podgorica, Bulevar Sv. Petra Cetinjskog no. 18, registration number with the Central Registry of Business Entities 4-0008972, TIN (ID registration number): 02751372, is issued a certification as an electricity transmission system operator. 2. This Decision is delivered to the Energy Community Secretariat to provide its opinion thereon. 3. Following the receipt of the opinion from the Energy Community Secretariat, the Agency shall render a decision in respect of the request for certification and publish it along with the opinion of the Secretariat in the Official Gazette of Montenegro and on the website of the Agency. Reasoned Statement 1. Legal Grounds for Rendering the Certification Decision The Law on Cross-Border Exchange of Electricity and Natural Gas (OGM 42/16) envisages that cross-border transmission of electricity may be carried out solely by a certified transmission system operator that has international system cooperation established and provides conditions for operations in energy interconnection.
  • Urban Villages in China: Issues from Rapid Urbanization and Society

    Urban Villages in China: Issues from Rapid Urbanization and Society

    Urban Villages in China: Issues from Rapid Urbanization and Society Transformation A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Community Planning in the School of Planning of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, & Planning By Yuqiong Cheng Bachelor of Architecture, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China, June 2006 Chair: Menelaos Triantafillou Committee Member: Jay Chatterjee 2 ABSTRACT Urban villages have emerged as a unique phenomenon in China, resulting from rapid urbanization, and then they affect the development of Chinese cities. This thesis analyzes urban villages in China, their characteristics and existing renewal efforts, and tries to investigate proposed solutions to improve their physical renewal, housing provisions, management regulations, and socio-cultural conditions. The city of Shenzhen is used as a major case study to illustrate the issues with urban villages. Through the analysis of several data and physical conditions, the problem of urban villages in the city is assessed as well as the current need for solutions. The review of literature and policy analysis showed that current policy makes urban village reform more difficult, while current renewal patterns can work for different conditions of urban villages. Through case studies, lessons from history and successful cases are used to improve the quality of life for the needs of the innovations of urban villages. Based on the above findings, a recommended concept design is proposed and is applied to a real urban village in the city of Shenzhen. The key words Urban Village, Land Use, Urbanization, Urban Renewal 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank my Chair, Professor Menelaos Triantafillou, who as my advisor helped me progress, diligently read all my drafts, and guided me through the development of my thesis.
  • “Zoning Reconciliation” in Local Governments “İmar Barışı” Düzenlemesinin Yerel Yönetimler Düzeyinde Etkilerinin Analizi

    “Zoning Reconciliation” in Local Governments “İmar Barışı” Düzenlemesinin Yerel Yönetimler Düzeyinde Etkilerinin Analizi

    202 Planlama 2019;29(3):202–209 | doi: 10.14744/planlama.2019.04796 ARTICLE / ARAŞTIRMA Analysis of the Regulation of “Zoning Reconciliation” in Local Governments “İmar Barışı” Düzenlemesinin Yerel Yönetimler Düzeyinde Etkilerinin Analizi Zeynel Abidin Polat Department of Geomatics Engineering, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, İzmir, Turkey ABSTRACT ÖZ Urbanisation has emerged with the increase of migration from Kırsal alandan kentsel alanlara göçlerin artmasıyla birlikte kent- rural areas to cities. As a result of increasing urbanisation, the leşme olgusu ortaya çıkmıştır. Artan kentleşmenin neticesinde demand for housing has grown, and consequently, housing pro- konut ihtiyacı da artmış ve sonuçta konut üretimi de hızlan- duction has accelerated. In beginning of 2000s rapid population mıştır. 2000’li yılların başına kadar hızlı nüfus artışına rağmen growth and the lack of housing inventory have forced those aynı oranda artmayan konut stoku, kırdan kente göçen nüfusun migrating from the city to meet their own needs for housing kendi barınma ihtiyacını büyük ölçüde kent çeperinde hazine to a large extent by constructing illegal houses on Treasury veya özel araziler üzerine yasadışı konutlar inşa ederek karşı- or private land within the city limits. However, there are also lamaya itmiştir. Bununla birlikte yasal olarak yapılmasına engel housing projects that cannot be completed or inspected due bulunmayan fakat çeşitli sebeplerden dolayı tamamlanamayan to various reasons. Despite some precautionary measures, the veya kontrolden geçemeyen konut projeleri de bulunmakta- number of illegal settlements and slums in our city grew rap- dır. Alınan tedbirlere rağmen kentlerimizdeki kaçak yapılaşma idly. Local government responsibility for the management of ve gecekondu üretimi olanca hızıyla devam etmiştir.