Adapting to Protest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Adapting to Protest Inspecting policing in the public interest Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary – Adapting to Protest to – Adapting of Constabulary Inspectorate Her Majesty’s ADAPTING TO PROTEST The report is available in alternative languages and formats on request. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary Ashley House 2 Monck Street London SW1P 2BQ This report is also available from the HMIC website http://inspectorates.justice.gov.uk/hmic Published in July 2009. Printed by the Central Office of Information. © Crown copyright 2009 ISBN: 978-1-84726-943-0 Ref: 296834 CONTENTS Summary2 Chapter 1 Introduction 14 Chapter 2 Background 18 Chapter 3 Perceptions of protest at G20 26 Chapter 4 Police preparation and planning for G20 36 Chapter 5 Policing operation on 1st April 2009 48 Chapter 6 Use of force in public order situations 56 Chapter 7 Conclusion 64 AnnexA: Summaryofinterviewees 67 AnnexB: TermsofReference 68 AnnexC: LegalFrameworkforPolicingProtest 70 AnnexD: Timeline 76 AnnexE: IpsosMORISummaryofsurveyresults 81 AnnexF: NatureofDirectionandControlComplaints 91 AnnexG: SummaryofG20/G8summitsandothersignificant anti-globalisationprotests 95 AnnexH: G20ProtestEvents:28thMarch–2ndApril2009 99 AnnexI: Strengthsandconsiderations:Containment,Communication, UseofForce 102 Glossary 105 Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary – Adapting to Protest 1 We are in an age where consent cannot be assumed and policing, including public order policing, should be designed to win the consent of the public. WithkindpermissionofCityofLondonPolice 2 Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary – Adapting to Protest SUMMARY SUMMARY The 1st April 2009 was a unique day for the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and the policing operation that surrounded the G20 summit was highly effective in significant respects. However, tragic events on the day led to a focus on the police approach to protest, notably the use of containment and the manner in which force was used by police. The death of Ian Tomlinson and other individual complaints are being investigated by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). This review, conducted at the request of the Commissioner of the MPS, concerns the policing methods used on the day. There are lessons to be learnt and issues that merit early consideration for the policing of future public order events during the remainder of the summer. Context ProtestswereheldintheCityofLondonon the1standthe2ndApril2009tocoincidewith On the 18th December 2008, the MPS was the G20 summit. The scale of the policing askedtobeginplanningthepoliceoperation operationrequiredwasconsiderable–onthe todeliverasafeandsecureenvironmentfor 1stAprilalonetherewere10separate protests 1 the G20 summit that would take place in over seven sites in London, including the LondonattheExCelCentreinApril2009.The ExCel Centre itself. Ensuring the security of very nature and timing of the event meant the ExCel Centre as the main G20 summit thatthepoliceandotheragenciesonlyhad venue inevitably drew considerable police a limited amount of time to prepare the resourceandfocus. security arrangements where the safety of world leaders, including the President of On the 1st April violent confrontation the United States of America, and other between protesters and police occurred at dignitarieshadtobeassured.Thispresented theBankofEnglandandBishopsgate.Police a challenging timescale for planning an were in places required to react to serious operation of this magnitude. In comparison, violence,aswitnessedinvideofootageofan preparation for the G8 summit in 2013 is attackontheRoyalBankofScotland. alreadyunderway.2 1 TheGroupofTwenty(G20)wasestablishedin1999tobringtogetherWorldLeaders,FinanceMinistersandCentralBank Governors. 2 ThelocationoftheG8in2013willnotbedecideduntil2011sothereisnoleadforceyet. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary – Adapting to Protest 3 Theevolutionofcommunicationtechnology area. The police have statutory powers and usedtorecordandaccessimagesofviolent duties in relation to the policing of protest, confrontations between the police and including those set out in the Public Order protestersinfluencedemergingviewsofthe Act1986,theCriminalJusticeandPublicOrder policeoperationon1stApril.Thehighvolume Act 1994, the Criminal Law Act 1967, the ofpubliclysourcedfootageoftheprotests, Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, and including the events leading up to the common law powers and duties, including death of Ian Tomlinson, has demonstrated powers to prevent breaches of the peace. theinfluenceof‘citizenjournalists’–members The use of all police powers must be of the public who play an active role in considered in accordance with the Human collecting, analysing and distributing media Rights Act 1998. This requires all public themselves. Consequently, individual and authorities,3includingthepolice,toactina collectivepoliceactionsareunderenormous waywhichiscompatiblewiththerightsset public scrutiny. Following these events, outinSchedule1totheAct,whicharetaken Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary from the European Convention on Human (HMIC)wasrequestedbytheMPStoconduct Rights (ECHR), unless primary legislation a review of the policing operation and to requiresthemtoactotherwise.4 test the arguments for and against the use of police public order tactics from public, The ECHR rights incorporated into our legalandoperationalperspectives. domestic law which are relevant to the policing of protest include ECHR Article 2 In some significant respects, the police (the right to life), ECHR Article 3 (the planned and responded effectively to three prohibition on inhuman treatment), ECHR eventualities: security, notified protest Article5(therighttoliberty),ECHRArticle8 and disorder. The police succeeded in (therighttorespectforprivateandfamilylife providingasafeandsecureenvironmentfor andtoahome)andECHRArticles9,10and11 the G20 summit and the activities of the (freedomofreligion,expressionandassembly delegations attending. The ‘Stop the War’ respectively which, taken together, provide march and rally in London on the 1st April arightofprotest). involvingover1,000protesterswasfacilitated by police and passed off without incident. ECHR Article 11 places both negative and Damageanddisruptioncausedbyprotestsin positive obligations on the police. The the City of London to businesses, residents policemustnotpreventorrestrictpeaceful and the general public was also minimised. protest5 except to the extent allowed by In these respects, the police achieved ECHRArticle11(2)(seebelow).Inaddition,the their objectives as intended. Nevertheless police have a duty in certain circumstances the policing operation relating to the City tosafeguardtherighttopeacefulassembly.6 of London protests has been the subject In other words, public authorities, including ofcriticism. the police, are required to show a certain degree of tolerance towards peaceful LeGAL FrAmework For gatherings where demonstrators do not the PoLICInG oF ProteSt engage in acts of violence,7 even if these protests cause a level of obstruction or The majority of protests which take place disruption.Theleveloftolerancethatshould in densely populated cities like London will be extended is likely to be the subject of causesomelevelofobstructionordisruption extensivepublicandpoliticaldebate,which unless they are conducted in a controlled hasmeritinitsownright. 3 Apublicauthorityincludesanybodyexercisingfunctionsofapublicnature. 4 HumanRightsAct1998,ss.6(1)and6(2). 5 Cisse v France(2002)(AppNo.51346/99). 6 Bukta and Others v Hungary(2007)(App.No.25691/04). 7 Oya Ataman v Turkey(2006)(App.No.745452/01). 4 Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary – Adapting to Protest SUMMARY However,ECHRArticle11isaqualifiedright, ismeasuredbythesecuritythattheyhaveto which means that the police may impose go about their business free of interference lawful restrictions on the exercise of the fromprotestersoranybodyelse.Inthesame righttofreedomofassemblyprovidedsuch way, opinion is split about the rights and restrictionsareprescribedbylaw,pursueone dutiesofprotestersorthoseaffectedbythe ormorelegitimateaimsandarenecessaryina protestandtheroleofthepolice. democraticsociety(i.e.fulfilapressingsocial needandareproportionate).Thepolicehave Balancing the rights of protesters and other powersunderboththecommonlawandthe citizenswiththedutytoprotectpeopleand PublicOrderAct19868toimposeconditions property from the threat of harm or injury onpublicprocessionsandpublicassemblies. defines the policing dilemma in relation to publicprotest.Inademocraticsocietypoliced PeaceFUL ProteSt And byconsent,planningandactionateverylevel the PoLICInG dILemmA must be seen to reconcile all these factors, particularlywhenaminorityofpeoplemay We should remember that public protests be determined to cause disorder or havebeenpartofBritishpoliticallifeforavery worse. Peaceful protest requires careful long time. Protests are an important safety interpretation of the law. The law is an valveforstronglyheldviews.Inaddition,the important consideration in public order righttoprotestinpublicisasynthesisoficonic events but as Lord Scarman pointed out freedoms:freeassemblyandfreespeech. in relation to maintaining “The Queen’s Peace”, “it is well recognised that successful The preservation and facilitation of those policing depends on the exercise of rights is not new. In introducing the Public discretion on how the law is enforced.” OrderBillof1936SirJohnSimon,Secretaryof The debate on the impact of
Recommended publications
  • James Rowson Phd Thesis Politics and Putinism a Critical Examination
    Politics and Putinism: A Critical Examination of New Russian Drama James Rowson A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Royal Holloway, University of London Department of Drama, Theatre & Dance September 2017 1 Declaration of Authorship I James Rowson hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Abstract This thesis will contextualise and critically explore how New Drama (Novaya Drama) has been shaped by and adapted to the political, social, and cultural landscape under Putinism (from 2000). It draws on close analysis of a variety of plays written by a burgeoning collection of playwrights from across Russia, examining how this provocative and political artistic movement has emerged as one of the most vehement critics of the Putin regime. This study argues that the manifold New Drama repertoire addresses key facets of Putinism by performing suppressed and marginalised voices in public arenas. It contends that New Drama has challenged the established, normative discourses of Putinism presented in the Russian media and by Putin himself, and demonstrates how these productions have situated themselves in the context of the nascent opposition movement in Russia. By doing so, this thesis will offer a fresh perspective on how New Drama’s precarious engagement with Putinism provokes political debate in contemporary Russia, and challenges audience members to consider their own role in Putin’s autocracy. The first chapter surveys the theatrical and political landscape in Russia at the turn of the millennium, focusing on the political and historical contexts of New Drama in Russian theatre and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • CLP Policing Public Order
    MPA Civil Liberties Panel Responding to G20 DRAFT REPORT 16 March 2010 ‐ Final Draft Contents Chair’s Foreword 3 Executive Summary 4 Summary of Recommendations 6 Glossary 10 Introduction 12 What we did and how 13 Learning the lessons 15 Facilitating Public Protest 16 Training 17 Supervision 19 Event Planning 20 Command and Control 23 Engaging with the media 25 Tactics and Equipment 27 What Next? 33 Appendices 34 2 Chair’s Foreword CHAIR’S FOREWORD—TO BE INSERTED 3 Executive summary Following the policing of the protests in central London on 1 and 2 April 2009, which were timed to coincide with the meeting of the G20 heads of state in London, the police came in for significant criticism. The tragic death of Ian Tomlinson and media furore fol‐ lowing the G20 protests, prompted a fundamental questioning of the approach to polic‐ ing protest. Several scrutinies of how the demonstrations were policed have been con‐ ducted, including an inspection by Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary (HMCIC), at the request of the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). The panel’s review overlaps the findings of those reports. This was unavoidable, given the panel’s need to understand how the MPS are responding to the recommendations that were made. Where the Civil Liberties Panel felt there were gaps in those scrutinies, we have conducted our own investigations. The Panel acknowledges that the MPS po‐ lices thousands of public order events annually and that most of these pass without inci‐ dent. However, the impact on public confidence in policing caused by a small number of instances of poor policing cannot be overestimated and it is for this reason that the MPA’s Civil Liberties Panel chose this as their first topic for review.
    [Show full text]
  • What a Difference a Death Makes
    Edinburgh Research Explorer What a Difference a Death Makes Citation for published version: Rosie, M & Gorringe, H 2009, 'What a Difference a Death Makes: Protest, Policing and the Press at the G20', Sociological Research Online, vol. 14, no. 5. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2047 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.5153/sro.2047 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Sociological Research Online Publisher Rights Statement: With permission. © Rosie, M., & Gorringe, H. (2009). What a Difference a Death Makes: Protest, Policing and the Press at the G20. Sociological Research Online, 14(5), http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.2047 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 Michael Rosie & Hugo Gorringe What a difference a death makes: Protest, policing and the press at the G20 Abstract The casual observer of the controversy over policing at April 2009’s G20 summit in London might have been forgiven for imagining that Britain’s media serves as a bulwark against the abuse of power, fearlessly illuminating and condemning injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bank Restriction Act and the Regime Shift to Paper Money, 1797-1821
    European Historical Economics Society EHES WORKING PAPERS IN ECONOMIC HISTORY | NO. 100 Danger to the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street? The Bank Restriction Act and the regime shift to paper money, 1797-1821 Patrick K. O’Brien Department of Economic History, London School of Economics Nuno Palma Department of History and Civilization, European University Institute Department of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, University of Groningen JULY 2016 EHES Working Paper | No. 100 | July 2016 Danger to the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street? The Bank Restriction Act and the regime shift to paper money, 1797-1821* Patrick K. O’Brien Department of Economic History, London School of Economics Nuno Palma Department of History and Civilization, European University Institute Department of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, University of Groningen Abstract The Bank Restriction Act of 1797 suspended the convertibility of the Bank of England's notes into gold. The current historical consensus is that the suspension was a result of the state's need to finance the war, France’s remonetization, a loss of confidence in the English country banks, and a run on the Bank of England’s reserves following a landing of French troops in Wales. We argue that while these factors help us understand the timing of the Restriction period, they cannot explain its success. We deploy new long-term data which leads us to a complementary explanation: the policy succeeded thanks to the reputation of the Bank of England, achieved through a century of prudential collaboration between the Bank and the Treasury. JEL classification: N13, N23, N43 Keywords: Bank of England, financial revolution, fiat money, money supply, monetary policy commitment, reputation, and time-consistency, regime shift, financial sector growth * We are grateful to Mark Dincecco, Rui Esteves, Alex Green, Marjolein 't Hart, Phillip Hoffman, Alejandra Irigoin, Richard Kleer, Kevin O’Rourke, Jaime Reis, Rebecca Simson, Albrecht Ritschl, Joan R.
    [Show full text]
  • 861 Sq Ft Headquarters Office Building Your Own Front Door
    861 SQ FT HEADQUARTERS OFFICE BUILDING YOUR OWN FRONT DOOR This quite unique property forms part of the building known as Rotherwick House. The Curve comprises a self-contained building, part of which is Grade II Listed, which has been comprehensively refurbished to provide bright contemporary Grade A office space. The property — located immediately to the east of St Katharine’s Dock and adjoining Thomas More Square — benefits from the immediate area which boasts a wide variety of retail and restaurant facilities. SPECIFICATION • Self-contained building • Generous floor to ceiling heights • New fashionable refurbishment • Full-height windows • New air conditioning • Two entrances • Floor boxes • Grade II Listed building • LG7 lighting with indirect LED up-lighting • Fire and security system G R E A ET T THE TEA TRE E D S A BUILDING OL S T E R SHOREDITCH N S HOUSE OLD STREET T R E E T BOX PARK AD L RO NWEL SHOREDITCH CLERKE C I HIGH STREET T Y R G O O A S D W S F H A O E R L U A L R T AD T H I O R T R N A S STEPNEY D’ O O M AL G B N A GREEN P O D E D T H G O T O WHITECHAPEL A N N R R R O D BARBICAN W O CHANCERY E A FARRINGDON T N O LANE D T T E N H A E M C T N O C LBOR A D O HO M A IGH MOORGATE G B O H S R R U TOTTENHAM M L R LIVERPOOL P IC PE T LO E COURT ROAD NDON WA O K A LL R N R H STREET H C L C E E O S A I SPITALFIELDS I IT A A W B N H D L E W STE S R PNEY WAY T O J R U SALESFORCE A E HOLBORN B T D REE TOWER E ST N I D L XFOR E G T O W R E K G ES H ALDGATE I A H E N TE A O M LONDON MET.
    [Show full text]
  • Information, Archives and Financial History
    Information, Archives and Financial History The fifth Rothschild Archive Lecture was delivered by Emma Rothschild at the new premises of the London bank founded by Nathan Mayer Rothschild. Archives exist in a condition of continuing unrest, and the circumstances of public and private archives are now unusually insecure. Archives are at risk, in particular, for two opposing reasons – because of the loss or potential loss of information, and because of the excess of informa- tion. I shall return to these two perils. But let me start with celebration. Distinguished ladies and gentlemen of the City of London, as you entered this marvellous building earlier tonight, your eyes were captivated, I am sure, by the spectacular entrance way to your left, which the architectural critic of Le Monde rightly described as ‘brilliantissime’, or by the vista ahead of St Stephen Walbrook, which has been known, since the eighteenth century, as ‘the Master-piece of Sir Christopher Wren.’1 Some of you, perhaps, also looked to your right, at the Reading Room of The Rothschild Archive. It, too, is brilliantissimo. It is a marvellous space. And it is also the most visible new expression of the importance of archives to be found anywhere in the City, or in the financial world. I want to thank Rothschild in London for the opportunity to give the lecture tonight, and for their vision in providing this space for The Rothschild Archive; to The Rothschild Archive Trust, and its chairman Eric de Rothschild, for their stewardship of the archives; and to Melanie Aspey, to her predecessor Victor Gray, and to their exceptional staffs, for making the Archive what it is.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer of Rage? Climate Camp, Cake and Bunting G20 Protest Diary Police Violence May ‘09 - September ‘09
    issue 6 / May - Sep 09 / £1.80 In Memory of Steve Cohen the anti-Zionist Zionist Film Review Baader-Meinhof Complex Interviews Marina Pepper Whitechapel Anarchists Summer of rage? Climate Camp, cake and bunting G20 protest diary Police violence May ‘09 - September ‘09 Contents Shift Magazine Issue 6 4 In Memory of Steve Cohen An obituary by IONNEK of Indymedia London 5 Writing as a Jewish Traitor STEVE COHEN’S 2006 article on anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism 10 Interview with the Whitechapel Anarchist Group ...on their involvement in the G20 protests 12 Kettles, Cake and Bunting at the G20 ...were not enough, writes STEPH DAVIES 14 The G20 Diary JOHN ARCHER on his experiences in London and Strasbourg 18 Interview with Marina Pepper The G20 MELTDOWN organiser gives some insight into the group 21 Violence and Red-Green A philosophical essay by the FEARLESS THEORILLAS 23 Politics or Pathology: the Baader Meinhof Complex A film review by RAPHAEL SCHLEMBACH EDITED BY Lauren Wroe Raphael Schlembach PICTURE CREDIT Dan Egg (cover; p.15), pseudoliteral (pp.8/9), Charlotte Gilhooly (p.13), London IMC (p.14), Leon Neal (p.16), Lefteris Pitarakis (p.17) CONTACT SHIFT [email protected] www.shiftmag.co.uk EDITORIAL On 1 April, sometime after 7pm, we happened to walk unchallenged into the area around the Royal Exchange, which was eerily de- serted by protesters. A dozen or so policemen stood confused, almost dazed, at the corner of Cornhill and Birchin Lane – behind them the body of Ian Tomlinson. The death of a man at a protest that could hardly even be called a riot was certainly the most sobering aspect that we took away from that day.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, Hth February 1964 1251 B. W. Blydenstein &
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, HTH FEBRUARY 1964 1251 B. W. BLYDENSTEIN & CO. Persons of whom the Company or Partnership consists Name Residence Occupation Rein Adriaan Vreede . "Byways", Hazelwood Lane, Chipstead, Surrey Banker Hendrik Hendrikus Oerlemans . " The Cottage ", Havant Road, Emsworth, Hants Banker The Twentsche Bank (London) 54/55/56 Threadneedle Street, London E.C.2 . Holding Company Limited Netherlands Trading Society 54/55/56 Threadneedle Street, London E.G.2. Holding Company (London) Ltd. Name of Place where the Business is carried on 54/55/56 Threadneedle Street, London E.C.2. THE CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE Incorporated with limited liability in Canada Names of Places where the Business is carried on 2 Lombard Street, London E.C.3. 48 Berkeley Square, London W.I. THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK Incorporated in the State of New York, United States of America Names of Places where the Business is carried on 6 Lombard Street, London E.C.3. 46 Berkeley Square, London W.I THE COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF SYDNEY LIMITED Incorporated in New South Wales with Limited Liability Names of Places where the Business is carried on 27/32 Old Jewry, London E.C.2. 49/50 Berkeley Street, London W.I. THE COMMERCIAL BANK OF AUSTRALIA LIMITED Incorporated in Victoria, Australia Names of Places where the Business is carried on 12 Old Jewry, London E.C.2. 34 Piccadilly, London W.I COMMONWEALTH SAVINGS BANK OF AUSTRALIA Constituted under the laws of the Commonwealth of Australia by Act of Parliament cited as the Commonwealth Banks Act, 1959 Names of Places where the Business is carried on 8 Old Jewry, London E.C.2 Bush House, Aldwych, London W.C.2.
    [Show full text]
  • First Amended Complaint Alleges As Follows
    Case 1:20-cv-10541-CM Document 48 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In Re: New York City Policing During Summer 2020 Demonstrations No. 20-CV-8924 (CM) (GWG) WOOD FIRST AMENDED This filing is related to: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND Charles Henry Wood, on behalf of himself JURY DEMAND and all others similarly situated, v. City of New York et al., No. 20-CV-10541 Plaintiff Charles Henry Wood, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, for his First Amended Complaint alleges as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1.! When peaceful protesters took to the streets of New York City after the murder of George Floyd in the summer of 2020, the NYPD sought to suppress the protests with an organized campaign of police brutality. 2.! A peaceful protest in Mott Haven on June 4, 2020 stands as one of the most egregious examples of the NYPD’s excessive response. 3.! It also illustrates the direct responsibility that the leaders of the City and the NYPD bear for the NYPD’s conduct. 4.! Before curfew went into effect for the evening, police in riot gear surrounded peaceful protesters and did not give them an opportunity to disperse. 5.! The police then charged the protesters without warning; attacked them indiscriminately with shoves, blows, and baton strikes; handcuffed them with extremely tight plastic zip ties; and detained them overnight in crowded and unsanitary conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. 1 Case 1:20-cv-10541-CM Document 48 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 30 6.! The NYPD’s highest-ranking uniformed officer, Chief of Department Terence Monahan, was present at the protest and personally oversaw and directed the NYPD’s response.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Street Bus Station Closure
    Liverpool Street bus station closed - changes to routes 11, 23, 133, N11 and N133 The construction of the new Crossrail ticket hall in Liverpool Street is progressing well. In order to build a link between the new ticket hall and the Underground station, it will be necessary to extend the Crossrail hoardings across Old Broad Street. This will require the temporary closure of the bus station from Sunday 22 November until Spring 2016. Routes 11, 23 and N11 Buses will start from London Wall (stop ○U) outside All Hallows Church. Please walk down Old Broad Street and turn right at the traffic lights. The last stop for buses towards Liverpool Street will be in Eldon Street (stop ○V). From there it is 50 metres to the steps that lead down into the main National Rail concourse where you can also find the entrance to the Underground station. Buses in this direction will also be diverted via Princes Street and Moorgate, and will not serve Threadneedle Street or Old Broad Street. Routes 133 and N133 The nearest stop will be in Wormwood Street (stop ○Q). Please walk down Old Broad Street and turn left along Wormwood Street after using the crossing to get to the opposite side of the road. The last stop towards Liverpool Street will also be in Wormwood Street (stop ○P). Changes to routes 11, 23, 133, N11 & N133 Routes 11, 23, 133, N11 & N133 towards Liverpool Street Routes 11 & N11 towards Bank, Aldwych, Victoria and Fulham Route 23 towards Bank, Aldwych, Oxford Circus and Westbourne Park T E Routes 133 & N133 towards London Bridge, Elephant & Castle,
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER MAY 2017 Proof 08/05/2017 13:58 Page 1 NEWSLETTER
    BA NEWSLETTER MAY 2017_proof 08/05/2017 13:58 Page 1 NEWSLETTER www.barbicanassociation.com May 2017 Trafficam writing this shortly after “magic”our AGM – thank promised to take and up with London Transporthealthy the adjoining residential streets you to the many of you who came. Our poor state of Barbican Tube station and said he areas on Saturdays. speaker Christopher Hayward, chairman of would get the City to look at improving the Westminster has CHAIR’S the City’s Planning and Transportation cleanliness and design of the pavement in recently included a CORNER ICommittee, spoke with some passion about his Aldersgate Street outside. He was also urged to similar provision. It’s and the City’s desire to see “healthy” streets for put pressure on London Underground over tube particularly timely because the City is currently pedestrians; the continuing need for tall noise under the estate, to do something about consulting on its Code of Practice for buildings in the City; the impact of Crossrail; and light pollution in office blocks, and stop Deconstruction and Construction in the City – the Cultural Hub. developers building ugly buildings. which is the policy that governs construction Streets need to be safe but also healthy he One of the City’s major proposals to improve sites on all aspects, from hours of work, said, and he wanted the City’s streets to give the streets is its scheme to restrict access at pollution, and deliveries to archaeology and more priority to pedestrians – that linked with Bank junction: from 22 May only buses and wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Powers: Protests
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP5013, 15 February 2021 By Jennifer Brown Police powers: protests Contents: 1. Legislation 2. Police tactics 3. 2009: A landmark year for the policing of protests 4. A recent history of legislative reform 5. A new case for legislative reform? www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Police powers: protests Contents Summary 3 1. Legislation 4 1.1 Human rights 4 1.2 Police powers 5 1.3 Offences 7 1.4 Injunctions and orders 10 2. Police tactics 12 2.1 Planning 12 2.2 During a protest 13 2.3 Review 16 3. 2009: A landmark year for the policing of protests 17 3.1 Events at the G20 summit 17 3.2 Recommendations 21 4. A recent history of legislative reform 23 4.1 Decriminalising ‘insulting’ language 23 4.2 Amending ‘no suspicion’ stop and search powers in Terrorism Act 2000 24 4.3 Relaxing the rules for protests around Parliament 25 5. A new case for legislative reform? 26 5.1 Simultaneous protests 26 5.2 Difficulty moving protestors 28 5.3 Harassment and insulting language at protests 29 Cover page image copyright: Protest march London 2018 by David Holt. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 15 February 2021 Summary This briefing provides information for England and Wales only This briefing paper is part of a series which discuss police powers in England and Wales. The series is introduced by the briefing police powers: an introduction. Current Law The right to peacefully protest is protected under the European Convention of Human Rights.
    [Show full text]