Jansenism Between Thomism and Calvinism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jansenism Between Thomism and Calvinism chapter 12 ‘The World Is Content with Words’: Jansenism between Thomism and Calvinism Eric J. DeMeuse The controversies on grace which dominated theological discussion in the 17th century evidenced more confessional overlap than has often been recognized. Two loci classici of these controversies were, on the Catholic side, the unre- solved Congregatio de auxiliis between the Dominicans and Jesuits, and, on the Reformed side, the Synod of Dordt (1618– 19), which upheld the position of the Counter- Remonstrants over that of the Arminians. In the aftermath of these two events, a number of theologians on all sides recognized certain congruities between the various positions. The philosopher Gottfried Leibniz (1646– 1716) noted in 1688 that many Catholics consider Dordt’s position on predestination to be very close to that of Thomas Aquinas (d. 1274)—a judgment confirmed by the other articles in this volume.1 The French philosopher Pierre Bayle (1647– 1706), in his famous Dictionnaire, likewise argued that the position of the “Geneva confession” on grace was identical to that of the Thomists, but to this number he added a third party, the Jansenists.2 Despite admitting in 1684 that “Jansenism is a species of heresy that no one can define,”3 Bayle asserted that “the physical predetermination of the Thomists, the necessity of St. Augustin, that of the Jansenists, and that of Calvin, are all at the bottom exactly the same thing,” and expressed incredulity that the Thomists and the “Court of 1 Leibniz to Landgrave, July or August 1688, cited in Jean Orcibal, Jansénius d’Ypres (1585–1638) (Paris: 1989), 99 n. 24. 2 Pierre Bayle, A General Dictionary, Historical and Critical, eds John Peter Bernard et al., 10 vols (London: James Bettenham, 1734– 41), 6:362. 3 Pierre Bayle, Recueil de quelques pièces curieuses concernant la philosophie de Monsieur Des- cartes (Amsterdam: Desbordes, 1684), 23, translated in Tad M. Schmaltz, “What Has Carte- sianism to Do with Jansenism?” Journal of the History of Ideas 60, no. 1 (1999): 37– 56, here 42. In Bayle’s defense, Jansenism as a movement proved theologically and geographically diffuse, made more difficult to pinpoint by the liberality with which its opponents wielded the accusation of “Jansenist.” As Ephraim Radner writes, “[F.] Strowski’s judgment that there is no such thing as ‘Jansenism,’ but only individual ‘jansenists,’ is too extreme, but nonethe- less suggestive, given the heterogeneity of Jansenist commitments and their uneven embrace (Strowski, 1910).” “Early Modern Jansenism,” in The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theolo- gy 1600– 1800, eds Ulrich L. Lehner, Richard A. Muller, and A.G. Roeber (Oxford: 2016), 436–50. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2019 | DOI:10.1163/9789004409309_013 246 DeMeuse Rome” could disavow Cornelius Jansen (1585– 1638) yet laud Augustine.4 Such sentiments were hardly unique to Leibniz and Bayle.5 This essay investigates Bayle’s claim from the perspective of the Jansenists themselves— or, as they preferred to be called, the “Disciples of St. Augustine.”6 How did Jansen and his later defenders view their theology of grace in com- parison with that of the Thomists and the Calvinists, and, correlatively, what importance did the Congregatio de auxiliis and the Synod of Dordt hold for their self- understanding? Scholars have recognized for a long time now a tendency toward Thomism in “second stage” Jansenism— something the works of E.D. James and Sylvio De Franceschi, to which parts of the present study are very much indebted, have highlighted and deepened.7 There is a question, however, 4 Bayle, A General Dictionary, 2:479. 5 Pierre Jurieu, discussed below, also elides the doctrines de gratia of the Thomists, Calvinists, and Jansenists. Richard Baxter, A Key for Catholicks (London: R.W., 1659), 366, wrote, “How neer come the Dominicans and Jansenians to us in the points of Predestination, Grace and Free- will? For my own part, I scarce know a Protestant that my thoughts in these do more concur with, then they do with Jansenius, (that is indeed, with Augustine himself.)” John Owen identified Jansen’s “System of Doctrines concerning the Grace of God, and the wills of men” as reviving the same Augustinian principles of “one whole Order of their Fryers [Do- minicans].” Owen, Preface to Theophilus Gale, The True Idea of Jansenisme, both Historick and Dogmatick (London: Th. Gilbert, 1669), a4r- a5r. Owen also lauded “the more learned school- men,” like the Dominican Diego Álvarez, who “stoutly maintain the truth herein against the innovating Jesuits.” A Display of Arminianism (London: R. Edwards, 1809), 244. Cf. Sebastian Rehnman, Divine Discourse: The Theological Methodology of John Owen (Grand Rapids: 2002), 43; Carl R. Trueman, John Owen: Reformed Catholic, Renaissance Man (Aldershot: 2007), 23– 26. See also Richard Parr, The life of the Most Reverend Father in God, James Usher, late Lord Arch- Bishop of Armagh (London: Nathanael Ranew, 1686), 32. Goudriaan’s contribution to the present volume provides additional examples. 6 Brian Strayer notes that Jansenists hardly accepted the label, preferring “true Catholics” or “disciples of Saint Augustine.” See Brian E. Strayer, Suffering Saints: Jansenists and Con- vulsionnaires in France, 1640– 1799 (Brighton: 2008), 16. He also notes that Antoine Arnauld deemed “Thomist” an acceptable name, but I do not see how this conclusion can be drawn from the source he cites. Strayer cites Arnauld’s Seconde lettre à un Duc et Pair de France (Paris: 1655), in which Arnauld responds to those who call him and his friends “Jansenists,” writing that this is done with derision and not in the same spirit that those who follow the thought of Thomas Aquinas are called “Thomists.” Oeuvres de Messire Antoine Arnauld, eds Gabriel du Pac de Bellegarde and Jean Hautefage, 43 vols (Paris and Lousanne: Sigismond d’Arnay, 1775– 83), 19:394. 7 Nigel Abercrombie, The Origins of Jansenism (Oxford: 1936), 118. See E.D. James, Pierre Nicole, Jansenist and Humanist: A Study of His Thought (The Hague: 1972), 7–44; E.D. James, “The Problem of Sufficient Grace and the Lettres Provinciales,” French Studies 21, no. 3 (1967): 205– 19; Sylvio Hermann De Franceschi, Entre saint Augustin et saint Thomas. Les jansénistes et le refuge thomiste (1653– 1663): à propos des 1re, 2e et 18e Provinciales (Paris: 2009); Sylvio Hermann De Franceschi, “Le jansénisme face à la tentation thomiste. Antoine Arnauld et le thomisme de gratia après les cinq Articles de 1663,” Revue Thomiste 109, no. 1 (2009): 5– 54; .
Recommended publications
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Jenkins, Clare Helen Elizabeth Title: Jansenism as literature : a study into the influence of Augustinian theology on seventeenth-century French literature General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Jansenism as Literature: A Study into the Influence of Augustinian Theology on Seventeenth-Century French Literature Clare Helen Elizabeth Jenkins A Dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and The
    Awkward Objects: Relics, the Making of Religious Meaning, and the Limits of Control in the Information Age Jan W Geisbusch University College London Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Anthropology. 15 September 2008 UMI Number: U591518 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U591518 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration of authorship: I, Jan W Geisbusch, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature: London, 15.09.2008 Acknowledgments A thesis involving several years of research will always be indebted to the input and advise of numerous people, not all of whom the author will be able to recall. However, my thanks must go, firstly, to my supervisor, Prof Michael Rowlands, who patiently and smoothly steered the thesis round a fair few cliffs, and, secondly, to my informants in Rome and on the Internet. Research was made possible by a grant from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download How to Read Church History
    HOW TO READ CHURCH HISTORY: FROM THE BEGINNINGS TO THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY V. 1 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jean Comby, J. Bowden | 202 pages | 08 Sep 2011 | SCM PRESS | 9780334020509 | English | London, United Kingdom How to Read Church History: From the Beginnings to the Fifteenth Century v. 1 PDF Book A theologian of Louvain, Cornelius jansen — , and a French ecclesiastic, Jean duvergier de hauranne — , dreamed of a revival of patristic theology and practice beginning with the doctrine of grace. The Church in the High Middle Ages Moral decline The rise of the popes as secular princes was matched by the moral decline of the Church in western Europe. For a discussion of the religious doctrine, see Protestantism. Under henry viii the English Church was separated from Rome, but Catholic practice and doctrine were retained almost without alteration. Project Gutenberg 0 editions. Only in Russia did the society survive until its restoration in Such anachronistic gestures as the attempted deposition of Elizabeth I of England, however, were ultimately harmful. By the popes seemed to be more Renaissance princelings than spiritual fathers of Christendom. Followers embrace the sacraments of baptism and holy communion. If the work of these men, often quite unappreciated in its time, in defending Catholic doctrine was flawed by anything, it was that they were speaking as individuals without the authority of the entire Church. On his arrival in Worms in April , crowds gathered to see the man who embodied the struggle against the seemingly all-powerful Catholic Church. Dry, dry, sand paper dry. Church Universal and Triumphant. Many other satirized the community.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVRES ET BIBLIOPHILIE Jeudi 26 & VENDREDI 27 Octobre 2017 VENTE AUX ENCHÈRES PUBLIQUES
    LIVRES ET BIBLIOPHILIE JEUDI 26 & VENDREDI 27 OCtobre 2017 VENTE AUX ENCHÈRES PUBLIQUES Provenances : 1ère Vente Jeudi 26 octobre à 10h00 et 14h30 Bibliothèque Janséniste du Professeur Jean Mesnard (1921-2016). 2ème Vente Vendredi 27 octobre à 10h00 et 14h30 Bibliothèque d'un château en Armagnac. Diverses successions et collections de Bordeaux et d'Aquitaine. Lot 951 Photo de couverture lot 705 3 HÔTEL DES VENTES BORDEAUX SAINTE - CROIX 12-14, rue Peyronnet - 33800 Bordeaux S.A.S. BRISCADIEU BORDEAUX (Agrément 2002 304) ContaCT Photos SUPPLÉMentaires EXPERT DE LA VENTE T : 33 (0)5 56 31 32 33 www.briscadieu-bordeaux.com M. Michel CONVERT F : 33 (0)5 56 31 32 00 www.interencheres.com 06 30 36 96 13 M : [email protected] www.auction.fr [email protected] assisté de Jean Luc BOISSEAU RENSEIGNEMents partiCIPER À LA VENTE EN LIVE pour la bibliothèque du Professeur Mesnard. Antoine Briscadieu www.interencheres-live.com Thomas Nicolet ORDRES D'ACHAT ET TÉLÉPHONES Exposition DE LA VENTE Anne Courtois Briscadieu Mercredi 25 octobre : [email protected] de 10h à 12h00 et de 14h30 à 19h00 SOMMAIRE 1ère Vente : 2ème Vente : Jeudi 26 octobre à 10h et 14h30 Vendredi 27 octobre à 10h et 14h30 Une trentaine de lots intégrés tardivement dans la vente figureront en Bis de numéros mais ne figurent pas dans le catalogue. L'ensemble du catalogue (avec les bis) est consultable sur le site interencheres (ou interencheres Live). Détail lot 945 4 5 1ère VENTE : JEUDI 26 OCtobre 2017 À 10H & 14H30 6 - AMELOT DE LA HOUSSAYE (Abraham-Nicolas) ANCIENS Histoire du gouvernement de Venise.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornelius Jansen
    BIBLIOTECA UNIVERSITARIA DI GENOVA – PERCORSI TEMATICI UNIVERSALITAS & PERVASIVITAS il costituirsi e diffondersi della S.J. e suoi echi (1540 - 1773) di A. Pisani Schede autori Sotto attacco Cornelius Jansen Jansenius and Jansenism Cornelius Jansen, Bishop of Ypres ( Cornelius Jansenius Yprensis ), from whom Jansenism derives its origin and name, must not be confounded with another writer and bishop of the same name Cornelius Jansenius Gandavensis (1510-1576), of whom we possess several books on Scripture and a valuable "Concordia Evangelica." The subject of this article lived three-quarters of a century later than his namesake. He was born 28 October, 1585, of a Catholic family, in the village of Accoi, near Leerdam, Holland ; died at Ypres, 6 May, 1638. His parents, although in moderate circumstances, secured for him an excellent education. They sent him first to Utrecht. In 1602 we find him at the University of Louvain , where he entered the College du Faucon to take up the study of philosophy. Here he passed two years, and at the solemn promotion of 1604 was proclaimed first of 118 competitors. To begin his theological studies he entered the College du Pape Adrien VI, whose president, Jacques Janson, imbued with the errors of Baius and eager to spread them, was to exert an influence on the subsequent course of his ideas and works. Having hitherto been on amicable terms with the Jesuits, he had even sought admission into their order. The refusal he experienced, the motives of which are unknown to us, seems not to be altogether unrelated to the aversion he subsequently manifested for the celebrated society, and for the theories and practices it championed.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS of ST. PIUS X's DECREE on FREQUENT COMMUNION JOHN A
    HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS OF ST. PIUS X's DECREE ON FREQUENT COMMUNION JOHN A. HARDON, SJ. West Baden College HPHE highest tribute to the apostolic genius of St. Pius X was paid by * his successor on the day he raised him to the honors of the altar: "in the profound vision which he had of the Church as a society, Pius X recognized that it was the Blessed Sacrament which had the power to nourish its intimate life substantially, and to elevate it high above all other human societies." To this end "he overcame the prejudices springing from an erroneous practice and resolutely promoted frequent, even daily, Communion among the faithful," thereby leading "the spouse of Christ into a new era of Euchari^tic life."1 In order to appreciate the benefits which Pius X conferred on the Church by his decree on frequent Communion, we might profitably examine the past half-century to see how the practice which he advo­ cated has revitalized the spiritual life of millions of the faithful. Another way is to go back in history over the centuries preceding St. Pius and show that the discipline which he promulgated in 1905 is at once a vindication of the Church's fidelity to her ancient traditions and a proof of her vitality to be rid of whatever threatens to destroy her divine mission as the sanctifier of souls. The present study will follow the latter method, with an effort to cover all the principal factors in this Eucharistic development which had its roots in the apostolic age but was not destined to bear full fruit until the present time.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary's Report the Forty-Third Annual Convention
    SECRETARY'S REPORT THE FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL CONVENTION The Catholic Theological Society of America held its forty-third annual con- vention June 15-18, 1988, at the Sheraton Centre Hotel in Toronto. The theme of the convention was "The Sources of Theology." In the opening session, Wednes- day evening, June 15, G. Emmett Cardinal Carter, Archbishop of Toronto, and E. James Reed, Director of the Toronto School of Theology, welcomed the con- vention participants to Toronto. The first plenary address followed. The evening concluded with a reception sponsored by the University of St. Michael's College, Regis College, St. Augustine Seminary, and the Toronto School of Theology. The convention's Eucharistic liturgy was celebrated in the late afternoon of Thursday, June 16, in St. Basil's Church on the campus of the University of St. Michael's College. Bishop Richard Sklba, a CTSA member and recipient this year of the John Courtney Murray Award, was the celebrant and homilist. The con- vention reception and banquet followed the liturgy. At the end of the banquet President Michael Scanlon read the citation for the John Courtney Murray Award and presented the plaque and the medal to Bishop Richard Sklba. Thursday evening, after the convention banquet, the Resolutions Committee held a "hearing" for a discussion of several resolutions which were submitted for consideration and action at the annual business meeting. Friday evening there was a Special Session in which J. Bryan Hehir, of Georgetown University and the United States Catholic Conference, spoke about "Sollicitudo Rei Socialis and the Social Teaching of Pope John Paul II." The schedule of the convention program, with its plenary sessions, work- shops, and seminars, follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Spring 2010 Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Jason Skirry University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Skirry, Jason, "Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 179. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Abstract This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is based on his Augustinian theory of the mind’s perfection, which consists in maximizing the mind’s ability to successfully access, comprehend, and follow God’s Order through practices that purify and cognitively enhance the mind’s attention. I argue that the mind’s perfection figures centrally in Malebranche’s philosophy and is the main hub that connects and reconciles the three fundamental principles of his system, namely, his occasionalism, divine illumination, and freedom. To demonstrate this, I first present, in chapter one, Malebranche’s philosophy within the historical and intellectual context of his membership in the French Oratory, arguing that the Oratory’s particular brand of Augustinianism, initiated by Cardinal Bérulle and propagated by Oratorians such as Andre Martin, is at the core of his philosophy and informs his theory of perfection. Next, in chapter two, I explicate Augustine’s own theory of perfection in order to provide an outline, and a basis of comparison, for Malebranche’s own theory of perfection.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Épreuves De L'incertain 30 Et 31 Mai 2017
    Danna Kostroun, histoire, Indiana University, Purdue University-Indianapolis, Etats- Unis et résidente 2016-2017 à l’IEA de Nantes Action against Uncertainty : The Case of Port-Royal This paper examines the relationship between action and uncertainty at Port Royal. The Cistercian convent of Port-Royal-des-Champs became famous in the 17th century as the center of a Catholic reform movement known as Jansenism. The community at Port-Royal was made up of the nuns who lived in the convent and a group of lay men and women who lived on the convent farm in pious retreat. The community is famous not only for its role in religious reform, but for the intellectual work of its members, who published philosophical and polemical treatises on a number of subjects. Port-Royal was an institution designed to confront uncertainty. Its members recognized many forms of uncertainty and developed different responses to them. The first form of uncertainty dealt with the relationship between humans and God. To confront this uncertainty, Port-Royal adhered to tradition (St. Augustine’s writings on grace) and performed acts of routine, ritual, and repetition (i.e. Blaise Pascal’s human “machine” behavior). The next source of uncertainty dealt with the natural universe and human institutions. To confront this uncertainty, they produced treatises on logic, education, grammar, medicine, and other fields, through which they sought to establish a normative order through reason. A third source of uncertainty was that created by human passions. Humans generated uncertainty when they allowed passions (such as a desire for wealth, domination, or power) to obscure, blind, or otherwise obstruct reason.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Old Catholicism
    The Origins of Old Catholicism By Jarek Kubacki and Łukasz Liniewicz On September 24th 1889, the Old Catholic bishops of the Netherlands, Switzerland and Germany signed a common declaration. This event is considered to be the beginning of the Union of Utrecht of the Old Catholic Churches, federation of several independent national Churches united on the basis of the faith of the undivided Church of the first ten centuries. They are Catholic in faith, order and worship but reject the Papal claims of infallibility and supremacy. The Archbishop of Utrecht a holds primacy of honor among the Old Catholic Churches not dissimilar to that accorded in the Anglican Communion to the Archbishop of Canterbury. Since the year 2000 this ministry belongs to Archbishop JorisVercammen. The following churches are members of the Union of Utrecht: the Old Catholic Church of the Netherlands, the Catholic Diocese of the Old Catholics in Germany, Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, the Old Catholic Church of Austria, the Old Catholic Church of the Czech Republic, the Polish-Catholic Church and apart from them there are also not independent communities in Croatia, France, Sweden, Denmark and Italy. Besides the Anglican churches, also the Philippine Independent Church is in full communion with the Old Catholics. The establishment of the Old Catholic churches is usually being related to the aftermath of the First Vatican Council. The Old Catholic were those Catholics that refused to accept the doctrine of Papal Infallibility and the Universal Jurisdiction. One has to remember, however, that the origins of Old Catholicism lay much earlier. We shouldn’t forget, above all, that every church which really deserves to be called by that name has its roots in the church of the first centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Catholic View Ii
    These Living Waters: Common Agreement on Mutual Recognition of Baptism A Report of the Catholic Reformed Dialogue in United States 2003 - 2007 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Common Agreement on Mutual Recognition of Baptism 3. Historical overview: sacraments and sacramentality a. Sacramentality i. Roman Catholic view ii. Reformed view b. Sacraments i. Roman Catholic view ii. Reformed view c. Summary 4. Baptismal rites a. Our Common Early History b. Historical Developments: The Reformation c. Historical Developments: Roman Catholic d. [comparative chart of pre and post-Tridentine Baptismal Rites – appendix?] e. Development of Baptismal Rite after the Reformation i. Reformed ii. Roman Catholic f. Twentieth Century Convergence in Scholarship and Ritual i. Reformed ii. Roman Catholic g. Critical Comparison of Roman Catholic and Reformed Rites h. Conclusion: Similar Rites with Different Hermeneutics 5. Theology of Baptism: Roman Catholic, Reformed, and Common Perspectives a. What is baptism? b. Why does the church baptize? c. What does Baptism effect or signify? d. How is Christian Baptism related to the Biblical Economy of Salvation? e. What is the Relationship between Baptism, Faith and Discipleship? f. What implications does Baptism have for the church? g. Who may baptize and with what means and Formula ? h. Why do people need to be baptized? i. Who can receive baptism? j. Why do we baptize children? k. Why should someone be baptized only once? l. What is the relationship between baptism and confirmation and/or profession of faith? m. What is the relationship between baptism and election? n. What is the relationship between baptism and grace? 1 o.
    [Show full text]
  • Antoine Arnauld | Encyclopedia.Com
    encyclopedia.com Antoine Arnauld | Encyclopedia.com Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography COPYRIGHT 2008 Charles Scribner's Sons 4-5 minutes (b. Paris, France, 1612; d. Brussels, Belgium, 6 August 1694) mathematics, linguistics. Arnauld was the youngest of the twenty children of Antoine Arnauld, a lawyer who defended the University of Paris against the Jesuits in 1594. He was ordained a priest and received the doctorate in theology in 1641, and entered the Sorbonne in 1643, after the death of Richelieu. In 1656 he was expelled from the Sorbonne for his Jansenist views, and spent a good part of the rest of his life in more or less violent theological dispute. He died in self-imposed exile. Although in many of his nontheological writings Arnauld is identified with the Port-Royal school, his voluminous correspondence—with Descartes and Leibniz, among others—bears witness to his own influence and acumen. His philosophical contributions are to be found in his objections to Descartes’s Méditations, in his dispute with Malebranche, and in the Port-Royal Logic, which he wrote with Pierre Nicole. The latter, a text developed from Descartes’s Regulae, elaborates the theory of “clear and distinct” ideas and gives the first account of Pascal’s Méthode. It had an enormous influence as a textbook until comparatively recent times. The profound influence of the Regulae is shown in both the Logic and the Port-Royal Grammar, where it is assumed that linguistic and mental processes are virtually identical, that language is thus to be studied in its “inner” and “outer” aspects. This point of view underlies the project for a universal grammar and the notion of the “transparency” of language: mental processes are common to all human beings, although there are many languages.
    [Show full text]