DOCSLIB.ORG

Parabola Error Evaluation Based on Geometry Optimizing Approxima- Tion Algorithm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parabola Error Evaluation Based on Geometry Optimizing Approxima- Tion Algorithm Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] The Open Automation and Control Systems Journal, 2014, 6, 277-282 277 Open Access Parabola Error Evaluation Based on Geometry Optimizing Approxima- tion Algorithm Lei Xianqing1,*, Gao Zuobin1, Wang Haiyang2 and Cui Jingwei3 1Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003, China 2Heavy Industries Co., Ltd, Luoyang, 471003, China 3Luoyang Bearing Science &Technology Co. Ltd, Luoyang, 471003, China Abstract: A more accurate evaluation for parabola errors based on Geometry Optimizing Approximation Algorithm (GOAA) is presented in this paper. Firstly, according to the least squares method, two parabola characteristic points are determined as reference points to form a series of auxiliary points according to a certain geometry shape, and then, as- sumption ideal auxiliary parabolas are reversed by the parabola geometric characteristic. The range distance of all given points to the assumption ideal parabolas are calculated by the auxiliary parabolas as supposed ideal parabolas, and the ref- erence points, the auxiliary points, reference parabola and auxiliary parabolas are reconstructed by comparing the range distances, the evaluation for parabola error is finally obtained after repeating this entire process. On the basis of 0.1 mm of a group of simulative metrical data, compared with the least square method, while the criteria of stop searching is 0.00001 mm, the parabola error value from this algorithm can be reduced by 77 µm. The result shows this algorithm realizes the evaluation of parabola with minimum zone, accurately and stably. Keywords: Error evaluation, geometry approximation, minimum zone, parabola error. 1. INTRODUCTION squares techniques, but the iterations of the calculations is relatively complex. Ahn's method [3] improved the efficien- In the Image Processing or the Computer Graphics, the cy of iteration by processing the weighted fitting coefficient fitting of conic plays a foundational and important role in the matrix. Zhang [4] and Strum [5] proposed the objective func- curve profile matching [1]. Now that, parabola is difficult to tion based on the bias of geometry distance. But, the compu- fit as its geometry has conic feature. In recent years, parabola tation process contains a 4th order equation. It is not stable to is applied in many fields of Mechanical design and parts construct an ideal conic in some conditions. Liu [1] used six measurement algorithm. For example, among the aviation different constraints to get six basic conics, and generate the and aerospace industry, the parabola type of radial flow im- best conic by adding certain weights to the coefficients of the peller is adopted widely in the radial flow impeller machine six basic conics. Different fitting methods with constrain of propulsion system in order to enhance the aerodynamic matrices were listed for specific types of conic in Harker’s performance and strength of the impeller [2]. At present, a paper [6]. Chernov [7] posted a weighted gradient fitting mature and representative algorithm to evaluate parabola method to the scattered data points, and pointed out that the profile error is not used in most of coordinate measuring method can relieve the complexity in some conditions. Gao machine (CMM). Therefore, to evaluate parabola profile [8] combined the Genetic Algorithm and least square method error accurately has important application value for design together to solve the conic fitting problems. Li [9] mainly and processing of aerospace parts and precision measure- talks about how to select the coordinate system and the con- ment methods. straints to make the fitting curve approximately closer with the implicit conic equation. But her method is needed to So far, there is not a unified standard for parabola profile transfer the coordinate system first. error at home and broad. GB/T 1184-1996 does not have a specialized criterion to judge parabola profile error. Parabola All in all, the works just mentioned discussed the objec- fitting methods can be divided into two types: the methods tive functions and the different constraints after transferring based on algebraic distance and the methods based on geo- the coordinates. In this paper, we discuss two important metric distance. In 2001, the parabola fitting of least-squares problems. The one is to fit parabola in optional position of orthogonal distance (LOD) method was presented by Sung rectangular coordinate system, another is to evaluate the pro- Joon Ahn, and the method measured better than the least file error of given data. 2. THE PRINCIPLE OF THE GOAA Firstly, we can obtain two feature points (focus and inter- section between axis and directrix) and initial profile error d0 1874-4443/14 2014 Bentham Open 278 The Open Automation and Control Systems Journal, 2014, Volume 6 Xianqing et al. Y The least squares parabola Assumption ideal parabola Real measurement parabola Auxiliary focus Measurement point Nj(xnj,ynj) Wt(xt,yt) Reference focus Auxiliary vertex N0(xn.yn) Mi(xmi,ymi) Reference point M0(xm,ym) 0 X Fig. (1). The evaluation principle. by least squares method (LSM) with constraints [10]. Then, directrix point N0 (xn, yn ) ) of parabola as initial reference the two feature points are treated as initial reference points, points according to plane analytic geometry knowledge. The and then, 4 auxiliary points (vertexes of searching square) length of searching square is LSM error or estimated para- are arranged around them respectively (see Fig. 1), so we can get 16 groups of auxiliary feature points. If we assume arbi- bolic error d0 . The precision parameter can be changed ac- trary groups of auxiliary feature points are ideal feature cording to the effective number of measurement data, preci- points of ideal parabola 16, assuming ideal parabolas are sion of instrument and accuracy requirement of measuring reserved with geometry knowledge. Afterwards, calculating object, when the precision parameter is under micron level, the shortest distances between given points and assuming δ = 0.0001 mm. ideal parabolas, the minimum distance is named d1. If d0 ≤ d1, then the reference feature points remain and the length of 3.2. Constructing Auxiliary Feature Points searching square is reduced by half. Meanwhile, the new auxiliary feature points are reconstructed and repeat the pro- Two searching squares are constructed whose lengths l cess of solving d1. If d0 > d1, the feature points of assuming have initial error d0 . At same time, their centers are initial ideal parabola corresponding to d1 are the new reference fea- ture points and the length of searching square is remains the reference points (that are feature points) M0 (xm, ym ) and same, 16 groups of new auxiliary feature points are N (x , y ) (see Fig. 1). The vertexes of searching squares achieved. Repeating above processing, when the length of 0 n n searching square reduces a certain value, we could consider are named auxiliary points Mi (xmi , ymi ) and N j (xnj , ynj ) that the assuming ideal parabola approach ideal parabola (i = j = 1,2,3,4) , they are calculated below: very closely and stop the searching process. So the minimum between d0 and d1 is the profile error of parabola. "x = x = x + l / 2 m1 m2 m "xn1 = xn2 = xn + l / 2 $ $ x = x = x ! l / 2 3. THE STEPS OF THE GOAA $ m3 m4 m $xn3 = xn4 = xn ! l / 2 # # (1) y y y l / 2 y y y l / 2 $ m1 = m4 = m + $ n1 = n4 = n + 3.1. Selecting the Initial Reference Points, Initial Length $y = y = y ! l / 2 $y = y = y ! l / 2 and Accuracy Parameter % m2 m3 m % n2 n3 n Assuming the measurement points are expressed by 3.3. Constructing Auxiliary Parabolas Wt (xt , yt )(t =1,2,3,...,N). In order to reserve 6 parameters of parabola expressed by conic equation, we set LSM feature The 16 groups of auxiliary feature points are obtained points (focus M (x , y ) and intersection between axis and from auxiliary points M (x , y )(i = 1,2,3,4) and 0 m m i mi mi Parabola Error Evaluation Based on Geometry Optimizing The Open Automation and Control Systems Journal, 2014, Volume 6 279 N (x , y )( j = 1,2,3,4) according to permutation and com- The minimum range distance is named d1 with equation j nj nj (7). bination knowledge. Next, the 16 groups of main parameters of parabolas are achieved by the equation (2). d = min(d ) (7) 1 ij # p = M ! N % ij i j 3.5. Approximation Searching Method % xc x + x / 2 % ij ( mi nj ) If d ! d , searching squares are reconstructed with con- $ = (2) 0 1 yc y y / 2 % ij ( mi + nj ) stant reference feature points and half of length, repeat steps % 3.3-2.5, If d ! d , the feature points of assuming ideal pa- %tan " = y ! y / x ! x 0 1 ( ij ) ( mi nj ) ( mi nj ) & rabola corresponding to d1 are the new reference feature points and the length of searching square is the error right Where, p are focal length, are vertexes, ! ij xcij , ycij ij ( ) now l = d1, repeating steps 3.3-3.5, when the length of are the rotation angles of assuming ideal parabolas. searching square reduces a certain value (general condition l ! 0.0001 mm ), we could consider that the assuming ideal The measured parabola in any position of plane can be 2 2 parabola approaches ideal parabola very closely and stop the expressed by Ax + Bxy + Cy + Dx + Ey + F = 0 . The coef- searching process. So the minimum value between d0 and d1 ficients of the equation are gained with equation (3). is the profile error of parabola Δd . #A = cos2 ! % ij ij Δd = min(d0,d1) (8) %B = 2sin! cos! % ij ij ij 2 4. EXAMPLE %Cij = sin !ij % % 2 There is a series of measurement points belonging to the $Dij = 2( pij sin!ij " xcij cos !ij " ycij sin!ij cos!ij ) (3) % optional position parabola in the plane, added some noise E 2(xc sin cos yc sin2 p cos ) % ij = " ij !ij !ij + ij !ij + ij !ij points whose pre-set error is 0.1mm and are then simulated % 2 to test the algorithm in Table 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploding the Ellipse Arnold Good
    Exploding the Ellipse Arnold Good Mathematics Teacher, March 1999, Volume 92, Number 3, pp. 186–188 Mathematics Teacher is a publication of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). More than 200 books, videos, software, posters, and research reports are available through NCTM’S publication program. Individual members receive a 20% reduction off the list price. For more information on membership in the NCTM, please call or write: NCTM Headquarters Office 1906 Association Drive Reston, Virginia 20191-9988 Phone: (703) 620-9840 Fax: (703) 476-2970 Internet: http://www.nctm.org E-mail: [email protected] Article reprinted with permission from Mathematics Teacher, copyright May 1991 by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. All rights reserved. Arnold Good, Framingham State College, Framingham, MA 01701, is experimenting with a new approach to teaching second-year calculus that stresses sequences and series over integration techniques. eaders are advised to proceed with caution. Those with a weak heart may wish to consult a physician first. What we are about to do is explode an ellipse. This Rrisky business is not often undertaken by the professional mathematician, whose polytechnic endeavors are usually limited to encounters with administrators. Ellipses of the standard form of x2 y2 1 5 1, a2 b2 where a > b, are not suitable for exploding because they just move out of view as they explode. Hence, before the ellipse explodes, we must secure it in the neighborhood of the origin by translating the left vertex to the origin and anchoring the left focus to a point on the x-axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Analytic Geometry
    Chapter 10 Analytic Geometry Section 10.1 13. (e); the graph has vertex ()()hk,1,1= and opens to the right. Therefore, the equation of the graph Not applicable has the form ()yax−=142 () − 1. Section 10.2 14. (d); the graph has vertex ()()hk,0,0= and ()()−+−22 1. xx21 yy 21 opens down. Therefore, the equation of the graph has the form xay2 =−4 . The graph passes 2 −4 through the point ()−−2, 1 so we have 2. = 4 2 2 ()−=−−241a () 2 = 3. ()x +=49 44a = x +=±43 a 1 2 xx+=43 or +=− 4 3 Thus, the equation of the graph is xy=−4 . xx=−1 or =− 7 15. (h); the graph has vertex ()(hk,1,1=− − ) and The solution set is {7,1}−−. opens down. Therefore, the equation of the graph 2 4. (2,5)−− has the form ()xay+=−+141 (). 5. 3, up 16. (a); the graph has vertex ()()hk,0,0= and 6. parabola opens to the right. Therefore, the equation of the graph has the form yax2 = 4 . The graph passes 7. c through the point ()1, 2 so we have 8. (3, 2) ()2412 = a () 44= a 9. (3,6) 1 = a 2 10. y =−2 Thus, the equation of the graph is yx= 4 . 11. (b); the graph has a vertex ()()hk,0,0= and 17. (c); the graph has vertex ()()hk,0,0= and opens up. Therefore, the equation of the graph opens to the left. Therefore, the equation of the 2 has the form xay2 = 4 . The graph passes graph has the form yax=−4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • Apollonius of Pergaconics. Books One - Seven
    APOLLONIUS OF PERGACONICS. BOOKS ONE - SEVEN INTRODUCTION A. Apollonius at Perga Apollonius was born at Perga (Περγα) on the Southern coast of Asia Mi- nor, near the modern Turkish city of Bursa. Little is known about his life before he arrived in Alexandria, where he studied. Certain information about Apollonius’ life in Asia Minor can be obtained from his preface to Book 2 of Conics. The name “Apollonius”(Apollonius) means “devoted to Apollo”, similarly to “Artemius” or “Demetrius” meaning “devoted to Artemis or Demeter”. In the mentioned preface Apollonius writes to Eudemus of Pergamum that he sends him one of the books of Conics via his son also named Apollonius. The coincidence shows that this name was traditional in the family, and in all prob- ability Apollonius’ ancestors were priests of Apollo. Asia Minor during many centuries was for Indo-European tribes a bridge to Europe from their pre-fatherland south of the Caspian Sea. The Indo-European nation living in Asia Minor in 2nd and the beginning of the 1st millennia B.C. was usually called Hittites. Hittites are mentioned in the Bible and in Egyptian papyri. A military leader serving under the Biblical king David was the Hittite Uriah. His wife Bath- sheba, after his death, became the wife of king David and the mother of king Solomon. Hittites had a cuneiform writing analogous to the Babylonian one and hi- eroglyphs analogous to Egyptian ones. The Czech historian Bedrich Hrozny (1879-1952) who has deciphered Hittite cuneiform writing had established that the Hittite language belonged to the Western group of Indo-European languages [Hro].
    [Show full text]
  • Lines, Circles, and Parabolas 9
    4100 AWL/Thomas_ch01p001-072 8/19/04 10:49 AM Page 9 1.2 Lines, Circles, and Parabolas 9 1.2 Lines, Circles, and Parabolas This section reviews coordinates, lines, distance, circles, and parabolas in the plane. The notion of increment is also discussed. y b P(a, b) Cartesian Coordinates in the Plane Positive y-axis In the previous section we identified the points on the line with real numbers by assigning 3 them coordinates. Points in the plane can be identified with ordered pairs of real numbers. 2 To begin, we draw two perpendicular coordinate lines that intersect at the 0-point of each line. These lines are called coordinate axes in the plane. On the horizontal x-axis, num- 1 Negative x-axis Origin bers are denoted by x and increase to the right. On the vertical y-axis, numbers are denoted x by y and increase upward (Figure 1.5). Thus “upward” and “to the right” are positive direc- –3–2 –1 01 2a 3 tions, whereas “downward” and “to the left” are considered as negative. The origin O, also –1 labeled 0, of the coordinate system is the point in the plane where x and y are both zero. Positive x-axis Negative y-axis If P is any point in the plane, it can be located by exactly one ordered pair of real num- –2 bers in the following way. Draw lines through P perpendicular to the two coordinate axes. These lines intersect the axes at points with coordinates a and b (Figure 1.5).
    [Show full text]
  • 14. Mathematics for Orbits: Ellipses, Parabolas, Hyperbolas Michael Fowler
    14. Mathematics for Orbits: Ellipses, Parabolas, Hyperbolas Michael Fowler Preliminaries: Conic Sections Ellipses, parabolas and hyperbolas can all be generated by cutting a cone with a plane (see diagrams, from Wikimedia Commons). Taking the cone to be xyz222+=, and substituting the z in that equation from the planar equation rp⋅= p, where p is the vector perpendicular to the plane from the origin to the plane, gives a quadratic equation in xy,. This translates into a quadratic equation in the plane—take the line of intersection of the cutting plane with the xy, plane as the y axis in both, then one is related to the other by a scaling xx′ = λ . To identify the conic, diagonalized the form, and look at the coefficients of xy22,. If they are the same sign, it is an ellipse, opposite, a hyperbola. The parabola is the exceptional case where one is zero, the other equates to a linear term. It is instructive to see how an important property of the ellipse follows immediately from this construction. The slanting plane in the figure cuts the cone in an ellipse. Two spheres inside the cone, having circles of contact with the cone CC, ′, are adjusted in size so that they both just touch the plane, at points FF, ′ respectively. It is easy to see that such spheres exist, for example start with a tiny sphere inside the cone near the point, and gradually inflate it, keeping it spherical and touching the cone, until it touches the plane. Now consider a point P on the ellipse.
    [Show full text]
  • Parabola Equations - Mathbitsnotebook(Geo - CCSS Math)
    Parabola Equations - MathBitsNotebook(Geo - CCSS Math) https://mathbitsnotebook.com/Geometry/Equations/EQParabola.html Parabola Equations MathBitsNotebook.com Topical Outline | Geometry Outline | MathBits' Teacher Resources Terms of Use Contact Person: Donna Roberts A parabola is a conic section. It is a slice of a right cone parallel to one side (a generating line) of the cone. Like the circle, the parabola is a quadratic relation, but unlike the circle, either x will be squared or y will be squared, but not both. You worked with parabolas in Algebra 1 when you graphed quadratic equations. We will now be investigating the conic form of the parabola equation to learn more about the parabola's graph. A parabola is defined as the set (locus) of points that are equidistant from both the directrix (a fixed straight line) and the focus (a fixed point). This definition may be hard to visualize. Let's take a look. For ANY point on a parabola, the distance from that point to the focus is the same as the distance from that point to the directrix. (Looks like hairy spider legs!) Notice that the "distance" being measured to the directrix is always the shortest distance (the perpendicular distance). The focus is a point which lies "inside" the The specific distance from the vertex (the turning parabola on the axis of symmetry. The point of the parabola) to the focus is traditionally directrix is a line that is ⊥ to the axis of labeled "p". Thus, the distance from the vertex to the symmetry and lies "outside" the parabola directrix is also "p".
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2 Archimedes' Quadrature of the Parabola
    3.2 Archimedes’ Quadrature of the Parabola 111 mere points for other functions to be defined on, a metalevel analysis with applications in quantum physics. At the close of the twentieth century, one of the hottest new fields in analysis is “wavelet theory,” emerging from such applications as edge de- tection or texture analysis in computer vision, data compression in signal analysis or image processing, turbulence, layering of underground earth sed- iments, and computer-aided design. Wavelets are an extension of Fourier’s idea of representing functions by superimposing waves given by sines or cosines. Since many oscillatory phenomena evolve in an unpredictable way over short intervals of time or space, the phenomenon is often better repre- sented by superimposing waves of only short duration, christened wavelets. This tight interplay between current applications and a new field of math- ematics is evolving so quickly that it is hard to see where it will lead even in the very near future [92]. We will conclude this chapter with an extraordinary modern twist to our long story. Recall that the infinitesimals of Leibniz, which had never been properly defined and were denigrated as fictional, had finally been banished from analysis by the successors of Cauchy in the nineteenth century, using a rigorous foundation for the real numbers. How surprising, then, that in 1960 deep methods of modern mathematical logic revived infinitesimals and gave them a new stature and role. In our final section we will read a few passages from the book Non-Standard Analysis [140] by Abraham Robinson (1918– 1974), who discovered how to place infinitesimals on a firm foundation, and we will consider the possible consequences of his discovery for the future as well as for our evaluation of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 11. Apollonius and Conic Sections
    Lecture 11. Apollonius and Conic Sections Figure 11.1 Apollonius of Perga Apollonius of Perga Apollonius (262 B.C.-190 B.C.) was born in the Greek city of Perga, close to the southeast coast of Asia Minor. He was a Greek geometer and astronomer. His major mathematical work on the theory of conic sections had a very great influence on the development of mathematics and his famous book Conics introduced the terms parabola, ellipse and hyperbola. Apollonius' theory of conics was so admired that it was he, rather than Euclid, who in antiquity earned the title the Great Geometer. He also made contribution to the study of the Moon. The Apollonius crater on the Moon was named in his honor. Apollonius came to Alexandria in his youth and learned mathematics from Euclid's successors. As far as we know he remained in Alexandria and became an associate among the great mathematicians who worked there. We do not know much details about his life. His chief work was on the conic sections but he also wrote on other subjects. His mathematical powers were so extraordinary that he became known in his time. His reputation as an astronomer was also great. Apollonius' mathematical works Apollonius is famous for his work, the Conic, which was spread out over eight books and contained 389 propositions. The first four books were 69 in the original Greek language, the next three are preserved in Arabic translations, while the last one is lost. Even though seven of the eight books of the Conics have survived, most of his mathematical work is known today only by titles and summaries in works of later authors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parabola and the Circle
    Math 0303 The Parabola and the Circle The following are several terms and definitions to aid in the understanding of parabolas. 1.) Parabola - A parabola is the set of all points (h, k) that are equidistant from a fixed line called the directrix and a fixed point called the focus (not on the line.) 2.) Axis of symmetry - A line passing through the focus and being perpendicular to the directrix. 3.) The standard equation of a parabola (with the vertex at the origin). a.) If the Y axis is the axis of symmetry. x2 = 4py; p ≠ 0 FOCUS: (0, p) DIRECTRIX: y = – p b.) If the X axis is the axis of symmetry. y2 = 4px; p ≠ 0 FOCUS: (p, 0) DIRECTRIX: x = – p Student Learning Assistance Center - San Antonio College 1 Math 0303 Example 1: Find the focus and directrix and graph the parabola whose equation is y = -2x2. Solution: Step 1: Analyze the problem. Since the quadratic term involves x, the axis is vertical and the standard form x2 = 4py is used. Step 2: Apply the formula. The given equation must be converted into the standard form. y =−2x2 y = x2 −2 1 x2 =− y 2 1 1 This means that 4 p = − or p = − . 2 8 ⎛⎞1 Therefore the focus (0, p) is and the directrix is ⎜⎟0, − 8 ⎝⎠ y =−p ⎛⎞1 y =−⎜⎟ − 8 ⎝⎠ 1 y = 8 Step 3: Graph. Student Learning Assistance Center - San Antonio College 2 Math 0303 There exists a line parallel to the directrix and passing through the focus called the primary focal chord, |4p|.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Section 11.2 the Parabola Definition 1.1. a Parabola Is the Set
    1. Section 11.2 The Parabola Definition 1.1. A parabola is the set of all points, P = (x; y), that are equidistant from a fixed point called the focus and a fixed line called the directrix. Theorem 1.1. (a > 0) If a parabola has vertex at the origin and. (1) focus at (0; a) and directrix at y = −a, then the equation for the parabola is x2 = 4ay (2) focus at (0; −a) and directrix at y = a, then the equation for the parabola is x2 = −4ay (3) focus at (a; 0) and directrix at x = −a, then the equation for the parabola is y2 = 4ax (4) focus at (−a; 0) and directrix at x = a, then the equation for the parabola is y2 = −4ax 1 Section 11.2 The Parabola 2 Example 1.1. (a) Make a rough sketch of the graph of the parabola with focus at (0; 3) and directrix at y = −3. (b) What if the focus is at (0; −3) and the directrix is at y = 3? Example 1.2. (a) Make a rough sketch of the graph of the parabola with focus at (3; 0) and directrix at x = −3. (b) What if the focus is at (−3; 0) and the directrix is at x = 3? Remark 1.1. The vertex and the focus lie on the axis of symmetry. The distance, a, from the vertex to the focus equals the distance from the vertex to the directrix. The vertex is midway between the focus and the directrix. Example 1.3. Find the directrix of the parabola given by y2 = 6x (A) x = 3=2 (B) x = −3=2 (C) y = 3=2 (D) y = −3=2 Section 11.2 The Parabola 3 Definition 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflection Property of a Parabola
    Reflection Property of a Parabola Reflection Property: Lines perpendicular to the directrix of a parabola reflect off the surface of the parabola and meet at its focus. The diagram at right illustrates this. In the diagram, the red lines approach the parabola from the right, reflect off its surface and meet at the focus. This is how satellite dishes and parabolic antennas work. A paraboloid (a 3D version of the parabola) provides a wide area from which to collect signals. The signals reflect off the paraboloid surface and meet at a receiver placed at its focus, thus significantly amplifying the signal. Similarly, the red lines could begin at the focus, radiate outward, reflect off the parabola to produce a wider signal. This is how headlights work. If you place a light source at the focus of a paraboloid, it will radiate outward in all directions, reflect off the paraboloid and produce a wide beam of light. Proof: Let’s prove the reflection property of a parabola. Part 1: We will use coordinate geometry for the first portion of the proof. We are free to place the parabola anywhere in the coordinate plane, so we set its vertex at the Origin and orient it to the right. This results in a parabola of the general form: . The diagram at right provides coordinates for key points relating to this parabola. For a parabola of this form, the focus is units to the right of the vertex and the Directrix is units to the left of the vertex. We construct a triangle (in red) with the following vertices: , the focus; , a point anywhere on the parabola; and , the point on the Directrix that makes perpendicular to the Directrix.
    [Show full text]