DOCSLIB.ORG

ED378096.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 378 096 SO 024 387 TITLE Honor Systems and Sexual Harassment at the Service Academies. 'Tearing before the Committee on Armed Services. United States Senate, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, P.C. Senate Committee on Armed Services. REPORT NO ISBN-0-16-044394-6; Senate-Hrg-103-550 PUB DATE 3 Feb 94 NOTE 260p.; Some pages contain very small print. AVAILABLE FROMU.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cheating; *Codes of Ethics; Females; Higher Education; Military Personnel; *Military Schools; Military Training; Sex Bias; *Sexual Harassment IDENTIFIERS Air Force Academy CO; Military Academy (West Point) NY; Naval Academy MD ABSTRACT The U.S. Senate held a hearing to address two issues facing the nation's armed service academies--honor systems and sexual harassment. Th.:. was the first of several oversight hearings to be held regarding the service academies. Two events prompted the Senate to hold these hearings: (1) a cheating scandal at the U.S. Naval Academy that began in 1992; and (2) the publication of a U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) report in 1994 entitled "DOD Service Academies: More Action Needed to Eliminate Sexual Harassment." The Hearing consisted of the presentations of three panels to the Subcommittee on Force Requirements and Personnel. The first panel, consisting of U.S. Ambassador Richard Armitage and Vice Admiral David M. Bennett, discussed the cheating scandal at the U.S. Naval Academy. The second panel, made up of GAO personnel, summarized the findings of their 1994 report on sexual harassment. The superintendents-of the three service academies comprised the final panel. They discussed honor systems and sexual harassment at their institutions and the steps the academies had made to address these issues. The hearing document includes the presentations of all three panels as well as text from the GAO report and the "Report of the Honor Review Committee to the Secretary of the Navy On Honor at the United States Naval Academy." (CK) ******************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** S. HR0. 103-550 ca. HONOR SYSTEMS AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT AT THE SERVICE ACADEMIES co O HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRD CONGRESS SECOND SFSSION FEBRUARY 3, 1994 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services U.S. DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION OrtKe of Educational Reaearch and inipeownwnt OUCARONALRESOURCESiNFORMATION CENTER(ER ICI ha document has been reproduced as received Iron, the person or orconozabon originating it Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction Quality Pcnnts of view or opinions stated in the docu ment do not necessarily represent official OE RI position or policy U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 77-698 CC WASii.NCTON : 1994 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office,Washington. DC 20402 ISBN 0-16-044394-6 71 2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE COMMIT CEE ON ARMED SERVICES SAM NUNN, Georgia, Chairman J. JAMES EXON, Nebraska STROM THURMOND, South Carolina CARL LEVIN, Michigan JOHN W. WARNER, Virginia EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts WILLIAM S. COHEN, Maine JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico JOHN McCAIN, Arizenk JOHN GLENN, Ohio TRENT Low, Mississippi RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama DAN COATS, Indiana ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia BOB SMITH, New Hampshire BOB GRAHAM, Florida DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Idaho CHARLES C. ROBB, Virginia LAUCH FAIRCLOTH, North Carolina JOESEPH I. LIEBEFtMAN, Connecticut KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD H. BRYAN, Nevada ARNOLD L. PUNARO, Staff Director RICHARD L. REYNARD, Staff Director for the Minority 'is10"! T7:111 CONTENTS CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF WITNESSES FEBRUARY 3, 1994 Pap Armitage, Ambassador Richard L., Chairman, U.S. Naval Academy, Board of Visitors Committee To Examine the Honor Concept 3 Bennett, Vice Adm. David M., USN, Inspector General, Department of the Navy 65 . Gebicke, Mark E., Director of Military Operations and Capability Issues of the General Accounting Office 180 Graves, Lt. Gen. Howard D., USA, Superintendent, U.S. Military Academy 192 Roamer, Lt. Gen. Bradley C., USAF, Superintendent, U.S. Air Force Acad- emy 197 Lynch, Rear Adm. Thomas C., USN, Superintendent, U.S. Naval Academy 200 4 HONOR SYSTEMS AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT AT THE SERVICE ACADEMIES THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1994 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON FORCE REQUIREMENT'S AND PERSONNEL, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:37 a.m. in room SD-106, Dirksen Senate Office Building Senator Richard C. Shel- by (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Committee members present: Senators Shelby, Nunn, Byrd, and Coats. Committee staff members present: Arnold L. Punaro, staff direc- tor: and Richard D. DeBobes, counsel. Professional staff members present: Patrick T. Henry and Frank Norton. Minority staff members present: Richard L. Reynard, minority staff director; and Charles S. Abell, professional staff member. Staff assistants present: Cindy Pearson and Christina D. Still. Committee members' assistants present: Philip P. Upschulte, as- sistant to Senator Glenn; Terence M. Lynch, assistant to Senator Shelby; C. Richard D'Amato and Lisa W. Tuite, assistants to Sen- ator Byrd; Randall A. Schieber, assistant to SenatorBryan; Chris- topher J. Paul, assistant to Senator McCain; Richard F. Schwab, assistant to Senatot Coats. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR RICHARD C. SHELBY, CHAIRMAN Senator SHELBY. The committee will come to order. We have a number of members that are not here yet, but they will be coming in from time to time. Z. e Subcommittee on Force Requirements and Personnel meets today to receive testimony on the Honor Sys- tems, and on Sexual Harassment at the Service Academies. This is the first of at least two oversight hearings the subcommit- tee is planning for this year, regarding the service academies. The timing and selection of the subject matter for today's hearing is the result of two events: The recent completion of important reviews of the honor concept at the United States Naval Academy; and the re- lease of the General Accounting Office Report, entitled "DOD Serv- ice Academies: More Actions Needed to Eliminate Sexual Harass- ment." The integrity of the honor systems of the Nation's servile acad- emies has long been viewed by the Armed Services Committee and (I) 0 2 its subcommittees as a matter of serious national concern. These academies are national institutions, and we have a responsibili'y to the people of America to exercise on their behalf appropriate oversight of these institutions. Today, the U.S. Naval Academy is embroiled in a cheating scan- dal of major proportions that stems from the alleged compromise of an electrical engineering exam. This scandal began in December 1992. It has been an albatross around the neck of the Academy, its leadership, and the brigade for almost 14 months. The results of this scandal have the potential of dramatically af- fecting the careers of over 10 percent of the class scheduled to graduate this spring. I say this to emphasize just how seriously this matter is viewed within the committee, and just how impor- tant it is that we take the time today to address the facts of this very unfortunate and disappointing event. In addition to receiving testimony on the honor systems, the sub- committee will also receive testimony on the progress of actions taken to eliminate sexual harassment at the service academies. The fact that the subcommittee will address these two issues in the same hearing should, in no way, be interpreted that we see one or the other issue as being of lesser importance. Quite the contrary. We are addressing both issues today, because they are both so very important. We will hear witnesses on three panels today. The first panel consists of Ambassador Richard Armitage and Vice Adm. David M. Bennett, U.S. Navy. Ambassador Armitage recently served as the Chairman of the Committee of the Naval Academy Board of Visitors. This was charged to review the honor concept at the Academy, in light of the December 1992 compromise. Vice Admiral Bennett is Inspector General of the Department of the Navy. He recently completed a 7-month investigation of the cheating scandal. It is the subcommittee's hope that this panel will be able to help us understand the systemic problems that contributed to a climate in which such a large number of Midshipmen would find it accept- able to engage in activities at variance with the Academy's honor concept. In the second panel, Mr. Mark Gebicke and Mr. William Beusse of the General Accounting Office will present the report of the GAO's review of the issue of sexual harassment. In the third and final panel today, we will receive testimony on both of these issues from the three superintendents of our service academies: Army Lt. Gen. Howard Graves, Rear Adm. Thomas Lynch and Air Force Lt. Gen. Bradley Hosmer. At the outset, regarding these issi- es in general and the Naval Academy cheating scandal in particular, I would like to be very clear on several points. First, this subcommittee needs to get to the bottom of a very seri- ous, complicated matter. To do this, this subcommittee must under- stand the underlying or systemic causes of this scandal, and the evolution of events following the initial reports of a compromise. The subcommittee is not in any way involved in a witch hunt here. Nonetheless, I fully expect that our witnesses today will be asked some very tough, very direct, but very fair questions. 6 3 Second, I would note that the Department of theNavy is in the process right now of adjudicatingthe cases of those Midshipmen implicated in the cheating scandal.
Recommended publications
  • THE NAVAL SERVICE.Tif

    THE NAVAL SERVICE.Tif

    CHAPTER TWELVE THE NAVAL SERVICE Ninety percent of the world's commerce travels by sea; the vast majority of the world's population lives within a few hundred miles of the oceans; nearly three quarters of the planet is covered by water. Seapower protects the American way of life. -A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower Every danger of a military character to which the United States is exposed can be met best outside her own territory-at sea. -Rear Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan n 2007 the U.S. Coast Guard, Marine Corps, and Navy issued A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower, representing the first time the three services I jointly crafted a maritime strategy. The document stresses the naval services' mutual commitment to protecting the homeland and winning and preventing wars. Proliferation of weapons and information technology to transnational threats and rogue states poses an increasing range of threats to U.S. security interests. In addition to threats from kinetic weapons, hybrid warfare threats (e.g., financial, cyber) pose new challenges for the sea services, demanding a coordinated strategy and response. To better understand how responsibility for security in the maritime domain is shared among the sea services, this chapter describes organization, mis­ sion, and capabilities of each. 157 158 Naval Officer's Guide The Department of the Navy The Department of the Navy (DON) is to "be organized, trained, and equipped primarily for prompt and sustained combat incident to operations at sea'' (Navy Regulations art. 0202). The National Security Act of i947, as amended in i949, gov­ erns the role of the Navy in national defense.
  • Annual Report

    Annual Report

    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.

  • Teen Stabbing Questions Still Unanswered What Motivated 14-Year-Old Boy to Attack Family?

    Save $86.25 with coupons in today’s paper Penn State holds The Kirby at 30 off late Honoring the Center’s charge rich history and its to beat Temple impact on the region SPORTS • 1C SPECIAL SECTION Sunday, September 18, 2016 BREAKING NEWS AT TIMESLEADER.COM '365/=[+<</M /88=C6@+83+sǍL Teen stabbing questions still unanswered What motivated 14-year-old boy to attack family? By Bill O’Boyle Sinoracki in the chest, causing Sinoracki’s wife, Bobbi Jo, 36, ,9,9C6/Ľ>37/=6/+./<L-97 his death. and the couple’s 17-year-old Investigators say Hocken- daughter. KINGSTON TWP. — Specu- berry, 14, of 145 S. Lehigh A preliminary hearing lation has been rampant since St. — located adjacent to the for Hockenberry, originally last Sunday when a 14-year-old Sinoracki home — entered 7 scheduled for Sept. 22, has boy entered his neighbors’ Orchard St. and stabbed three been continued at the request house in the middle of the day members of the Sinoracki fam- of his attorney, Frank Nocito. and stabbed three people, kill- According to the office of ing one. ily. Hockenberry is charged Magisterial District Justice Everyone connected to the James Tupper and Kingston case and the general public with homicide, aggravated assault, simple assault, reck- Township Police Chief Michael have been wondering what Moravec, the hearing will be lessly endangering another Photo courtesy of GoFundMe could have motivated the held at 9:30 a.m. Nov. 7 at person and burglary in connec- In this photo taken from the GoFundMe account page set up for the Sinoracki accused, Zachary Hocken- Tupper’s office, 11 Carverton family, David Sinoracki is shown with his wife, Bobbi Jo, and their three children, berry, to walk into a home on tion with the death of David Megan 17; Madison, 14; and David Jr., 11.
  • Shakespeare on Film, Video & Stage

    Shakespeare on Film, Video & Stage

    William Shakespeare on Film, Video and Stage Titles in bold red font with an asterisk (*) represent the crème de la crème – first choice titles in each category. These are the titles you’ll probably want to explore first. Titles in bold black font are the second- tier – outstanding films that are the next level of artistry and craftsmanship. Once you have experienced the top tier, these are where you should go next. They may not represent the highest achievement in each genre, but they are definitely a cut above the rest. Finally, the titles which are in a regular black font constitute the rest of the films within the genre. I would be the first to admit that some of these may actually be worthy of being “ranked” more highly, but it is a ridiculously subjective matter. Bibliography Shakespeare on Silent Film Robert Hamilton Ball, Theatre Arts Books, 1968. (Reissued by Routledge, 2016.) Shakespeare and the Film Roger Manvell, Praeger, 1971. Shakespeare on Film Jack J. Jorgens, Indiana University Press, 1977. Shakespeare on Television: An Anthology of Essays and Reviews J.C. Bulman, H.R. Coursen, eds., UPNE, 1988. The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon Susan Willis, The University of North Carolina Press, 1991. Shakespeare on Screen: An International Filmography and Videography Kenneth S. Rothwell, Neil Schuman Pub., 1991. Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen Lorne M. Buchman, Oxford University Press, 1991. Shakespeare Observed: Studies in Performance on Stage and Screen Samuel Crowl, Ohio University Press, 1992. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television Anthony Davies & Stanley Wells, eds., Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 2017 Navy Football Media Guide Was Prepared to Assist the Media in Its Coverage of Navy Football

    2017 Navy Football Media Guide Was Prepared to Assist the Media in Its Coverage of Navy Football

    2017 NAVY FOOTBALL SCHEDULES 2017 Schedule Date Opponent Time Series Record TV Location Sept. 1 at Florida Atlantic 8:00 PM Navy leads, 1-0 ESPNU Boca Raton, Fla. Sept. 9 Tulane + 3:30 PM Navy leads, 12-8-1 CBS Sports Network Annapolis, Md. Sept. 23 Cincinnati + 3:30 PM Navy leads, 2-0 CBS Sports Network Annapolis, Md. Sept. 30 at Tulsa + TBA Navy leads, 3-1 TBA Tulsa, Okla. Oct. 7 Air Force 3:30 PM Air Force leads, 29-20 CBS Sports Network Annapolis, Md. Oct. 14 at Memphis + TBA Navy leads, 2-0 TBA Memphis, Tenn. Oct. 21 UCF + 3:30 PM First Meeting CBS Sports Network Annapolis, Md. Nov. 3 at Temple + 7:30 or 8:00 PM Series tied, 6-6 ESPN Philadelphia, Pa. Nov. 11 SMU + 3:30 PM Navy leads, 11-7 CBS Sports Network Annapolis, Md. Nov. 18 at Notre Dame 3:30 PM Notre Dame leads, 75-13-1 NBC South Bend, Ind. Nov. 24 at Houston + TBA Houston leads, 2-1 ABC or ESPN Family of Networks Houston, Texas Dec. 2 AAC Championship Game TBA N/A ABC or ESPN TBA Dec. 9 vs. Army 3:00 PM Navy leads, 60-50-7 CBS Philadelphia, Pa. + American Athletic Conference game All Times Eastern 2016 In Review Date Opponent Result Attendance TV Location Sept. 3 Fordham Won, 52-16 28,238 CBS Sports Network Annapolis, Md. Sept. 10 UConn + Won, 28-24 31,501 CBS Sports Network Annapolis, Md. Sept. 17 at Tulane + Won, 21-14 21,503 American Sports Network/ESPN3 New Orleans, La.
  • Georgette Heyer Sylvester

    Georgette Heyer Sylvester

    CLASSIC FICTION Georgette Heyer Sylvester Read by Richard Armitage NA492512D 1 Chapter 1 5:18 2 Leaving the breakfast parlour... 4:16 3 Chapter 2 4:29 4 ‘Edifying!’ remarked Sylvester... 5:50 5 Chapter 3 6:25 6 He left her with no clue to his sentiments... 3:29 7 Chapter 4 7:35 8 Phoebe fled back to the schoolroom... 7:40 9 Chapter 5 4:29 10 It was very cold when Lord Marlow... 7:11 11 Chapter 6 8:09 12 Chapter 7 5:24 13 His valet, Swale, a very correct gentleman’s gentleman… 3:51 14 Chapter 8 4:23 15 Mrs Scaling’s best bedchamber... 6:18 16 They left the room together... 5:31 17 Chapter 9 5:01 18 A welcome interruption was provided... 6:13 19 Tom drew a long breath... 4:27 20 Chapter 10 3:59 2 21 An hour later, Sylvester, beautiful to behold... 6:49 22 Mrs Scaling having unearthed from the recesses… 3:51 23 Chapter 11 5:33 24 The thaw soon set in... 3:04 25 Chapter 12 6:11 26 Fearing that at any moment... 7:38 27 Chapter 13 5:15 28 She then (to Phoebe’s alarm) sank back... 5:09 29 Chapter 14 4:27 30 The season had not begun... 4:23 31 Chapter 15 7:28 32 Sent out two days later... 3:54 33 When Phoebe left Albermarle Street... 4:14 34 Chapter 16 4:38 35 Phoebe looked instead at her, and in wonder. 3:37 36 Chapter 17 4:41 37 She thought there could be little fear of it… 7:03 38 Chapter 18 3:23 39 He led her onto the floor..
  • Report No. DODIG-2019-044 for OFFICIAL USE ONLY

    Report No. DODIG-2019-044 for OFFICIAL USE ONLY

    Report No. DODIG-2019-044 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY U.S. Department of Defense InspectorJANUARY 9, 2019 General Summary of Reports Issued Regarding Department of Defense Cybersecurity From July 1, 2017, Through June 30, 2018 INTEGRITY INDEPENDENCE EXCELLENCE The document contains information that may be exempt from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Summary of Reports Issued Regarding Department of Defense ResultsCybersecurity in From Brief July 1, 2017, Through June 30, 2018 January 9, 2019 Background Objective On February 12, 2013, the President issued Executive Order 13636, “Improving Critical Infrastructure Our objective was to (1) summarize Cybersecurity.” Executive Order 13636 calls for the unclassified and classified reports development of a voluntary cybersecurity framework issued and testimonies made from for Federal and non-Federal entities that provides a the DoD oversight community and the prioritized, flexible, repeatable, performance-based, and Government Accountability Office (GAO) cost effective approach to help owners and operators between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018, of critical infrastructure identify, assess, and manage that included DoD cybersecurity issues; cyber risk. The resulting NIST Cybersecurity Framework (2) identify cybersecurity risk areas for was established through collaboration between the DoD management to address based on the Government and private sector entities. The framework five functions of the National Institute has five functions, representing high-level cybersecurity of Standards and Technology (NIST), activities that provide a strategic view of the risk management “Framework for Improving Critical lifecycle—Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover.
  • Richard Armitage's Q&A on Twitter

    Richard Armitage's Q&A on Twitter

    Richard Armitage’s Q&A on Twitter 1- Q : Do you have any plans to do more theatre ? #AskThorin A : Yes, I met Yael Farber in New York, we have some projects…It will be a surprise. #AskThorin 2 - Q : Who’s your favourite band ? #AskThorin A : Today, it’s @bastilledan (Bastille) and @samsmithworld (Sam Smith) #AskThorin 3 - Q : What are your next projects ? #AskThorin A : “Pilgrimage”, a film in which my character is speaking 11th century French. 4 - Q : Do you actually speak French ? It would be cool ! #AskThorin A : A bit, like in “un peu de vin” #AskThorin 5 - Q : Who’s the naughtiest on set ? Martin Freeman or Ian McKellen ? #AskThorin A : As much as the other. #AskThorin 6 - Q : What are your favourite books, ones that you can read again & again ? #AskThorin A : I read “The Lord of The Rings” many times. I just finished “The Goldfinch” & it’s great. #AskThorin 7 - Q : How do you see yourself in ten years ? #AskThorin A : With ten more years & with Thorin’s face. 8 - Q : How heavy was it to wear this outfit ? #AskThorin A : It was the lightest of all the costumes but in order to wear it, it was necessary to use an electric drill. #AskThorin 9 - Q : What was the most useful, or bizarre, acting note Peter Jackson gave you ? #AskThorin A : Stop throwing up, get up & continue to fight. #AskThorin 10 - Q : What would Thorin say to French fellows ? #AskThorin A : “Allez-y !” (“Go for it”) #AskThorin 11 - Q : Take a Thorin selfie #AskThorin A : #Ask Thorin 12 - Q : If you were able to rewrite the ending of Tolkien’s book, how would you change Thorin’s fate ? #AskThorin A : I would ensure that he would pay more attention to his nephews on the battlefield.
  • Annapolis Guide

    Annapolis Guide

    ANNAPOLIS UNOFFICIAL DIRECTORY AND GUIDE. This is an unofficial publication by Military Publishers, Inc., a private firm in no way connected with the Department of the Navy. Opinions expressed by the publisher herein are their own and are not to be considered an official expression of the U.S. Naval Academy or the Department of the Navy. The appearance of the advertisements in this publication does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S. Naval Academy or the Department of the Navy, of the products or services advertised. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES RICHARD NIXON Rear Admiral James Calvert, U.S. Navy Youngest Admiral to become Superintendent of the U.S. Naval Academy in its 123-year history... A highly-decorated submarine officer who attracted world-wide attention in February, 1959, as commanding officer of the nuclear-powered submarine USS SKATE, the first submarine to break through the Arctic ice and surface at the North Pole. Author, graduate of the National War College, recipient of an honorary Doctor of Science degree from Oberlin College, which heattended beforeentering theAcademy... This is Rear Admiral James Calvert, USN, a native of Cleveland, Ohio, and a member of the Naval Academy’s Class of 1943. At the age of 47, he assumed command in July, 1968, as 46th Superintendent of the Naval Academy. While Admiral Calvert commanded the SKATE, she established an Atlantic crossing record for submarines and another mark for endurance submerged. Rear Admiral Calvert has written three books: SUR- FACE AT THE POLE, the story of the SKATE’s polar ad- ventures; THE NAVAL PROFESSION, a succinct description of the naval officer’s life, and A PROMISE TO OUR COUNTRY, a book of guidance and hope tailored for youngsters.
  • Oversight of Intelligence Activities with the Department of the Navy

    Oversight of Intelligence Activities with the Department of the Navy

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 1000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-1000 SECNAVINST 3820.3E NAVINSGEN-N2 21 Sep 2005 SECNAV INSTRUCTION 3820.3E From: Secretary of the Navy Subj: OVERSIGHT OF INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY (DON) Ref: (a) Executive Order 12333 (b) DOD Directive 5240.1 of 25 Apr 88 (c) DOD Regulation 5240.1-R of Dec 82 (d) SECNAVINST 5000.34B (e) DOD Directive 5148.11 (f) SECNAVINST 5510.30A (g) US Navy Regulations, 1990 (h) SECNAVINST 5215.1D Encl: (1) Naval Inspector General Intelligence Oversight Inspection Checklist (2) Naval Inspector General Intelligence Oversight Report Format and Content (3) Memorandum of Understanding: Reporting of Information Concerning Federal Crimes, August 1995 1. Purpose. To implement policies, procedures, and governing regulations regarding the conduct of intelligence activities, and a system of program reviews, inspections, and reporting requirements of those activities. This instruction has been substantially revised and should be reviewed in its entirety. Highlights of significant changes from previous instruction are as follows: a. Updated definition of DON intelligence components, to include new and reorganized DON intelligence organizations and describe revised responsibilities under this instruction, b. Further definition of the term “Questionable intelligence activity” and resultant reporting requirements (i.e. Procedure 15 reporting), c. Inclusion of a sample Intelligence Oversight inspection checklist, which may be used by components or elements as a guideline for administering an effective Intelligence Oversight program, (enclosure (1)), and d. Inclusion of a standard format for quarterly reports from DON intelligence components to the Office of the Naval SECNAVINST 3820.3E 21 Sep 2005 Inspector General (NAVINSGEN) (enclosure (2)).
  • Military Law Review

    Military Law Review

    Volume 139 Winter 1993 MILITARY LAW REVIEW 0 ? P JAG SCHOOL w W ARTICLES AUG 1 1993 MILITARY DEPARTMENT GENERAL 7 COUNSEL AS “CHIEF LEGAL OFFICERS”: IMPACT ON LIBRARY DELIVERY OF IMPARTIAL LEGAL ADVICE AT HEADQUARTERS AND IN THE FIELD.. ..............Lieutenant Commander Kurt A. Johnson REASON, RETALIATION, AND RHETORIC: JEFFERSON AND THE QUEST FOR HUMANIW IN WAR.. .........Burrus M. Carnahan JURY NULLIFICATION: A CALL FOR JUSTICE OR AN INVITATION TO ANARCHY? .............................. Lieutenant Commander Robert E. Korroch Major Michael J. Davidson THE TWENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY sU 2 OF MY LAI: A TIME TO E INCULCATE THE LESSONS. ................Major Jeffrey F. Addicott M Major William A. Hudson, Jr. P w W BOOK REVIEWS Charlottesville, Virginia Pamphlet HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY NO. 27-100-139 Washington, D. C., Winter 1993 MILITARY LAW REVIEW-VOLUME 139 The Military Law Review has been published quarterly at The Judge Advocate General's School, U.S. Army, Charlottesville, Virginia, since 1958. The Review provides a forum for those interested in military law to share the products of their experiences and research and is designed for use by military attorneys in connection with their official duties. Writings offered for publica- tion should be of direct concern and import in this area of scholarship, and preference will be given to writings that have lasting value as reference materials for the military lawyer. The Review encourages frank discussion of relevant legislative, admin- istrative, and judicial developments. EDITORIAL STAFF MAJOR DANIEL P. SHAVER, Editor MS. EVA F. SKINNER, Editorial Assistant SUBSCRIPTIONS: Private subscriptions may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
  • NAVAL ACADEMY PREPARATORY SCHOOL Information Brochure and Required Pre-Reporting Check Lists

    NAVAL ACADEMY PREPARATORY SCHOOL Information Brochure and Required Pre-Reporting Check Lists

    ACADEMIC YEAR 2019 - 2020 Information Brochure NAVAL ACADEMY PREPARATORY And SCHOOL Required Pre-reporting Check lists Table of Contents Subject Page Mission of NAPS 1 An Officer’s Career 1 Introduction 1 History of NAPS 2 Admission to NAPS 2 General Requirements 2 Medical & Physical Requirements 2 Academics 3 English Composition 3 Mathematics 3 Physics 3 Chemistry 4 Study Skills Development 4 Military 4 Honor Concept 4 Indoctrination 5 Character Development and Military Instruction 5 Athletics & Physical Education 6 NAPS Sports Program Schedule 6 NAPS Club Opportunities 6 Command Services and Support 7 Admin 7 Logistics 7 Information Technology 7 Appointment to the U. S. Naval Academy 8 Nomination Requirements 8 Post-Graduation Transfer 8 Table of Contents Subject Page Arrival and Checking Aboard 8 Newport, Rhode Island 8 Naval Station Newport 9 Transportation to NAPS 9 Arrival by Automobile 10 Required Arrival Times 10 Arrival Events and Guidance 11 Maps and Directions 12 Map of Naval Station Newport 13 Arrival Protocol 14 Checking-In 14 Civilian Clothes 14 Baggage 14 Medical Advisories, Information and Services 15 DoDMERB Advisory 15 Medical In-Processing 15 Dental In-Processing 15 Immunizations 16 Medical Care or Seriously Ill or Injured 17 Medications 17 Optometry 17 Injury Prevention 18 Health Insurance 19 Tattoos, Brands, Body Piercings 19 Alcohol and Drug Screening 20 Contact Information 20 Admissions & Enrollment 20 Medical 20 Pre-Arrival Checklists 21 Administrative Checklist 22 Financial Checklist 24 Miscellaneous Checklist 25 Personal Items Checklist 27 Academic Supplies Checklist 28 Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) Checklist 29 Immunization Record 30 Base Access Form 31 ii Mission of NAPS The ten-month course of instruction at NAPS, lasting from July to May, emphasizes To enhance midshipman and cadet preparation in English, mathematics, candidates’ moral, mental, and physical chemistry, and physics.