Contamination Control Assessment of the World's Largest Space

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Contamination Control Assessment of the World's Largest Space NASA/TM—2012-217823 Contamination Control Assessment of the World’s Largest Space Environment Simulation Chamber Aaron Snyder, Michael W. Henry, and Stanley P. Grisnik Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Stephen M. Sinclair Sierra Lobo, Inc., Fremont, Ohio December 2012 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientific and technical NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices technical, or historical information from of the Agency Chief Information Officer. It collects, NASA programs, projects, and missions, often organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates concerned with subjects having substantial NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access public interest. to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- Server, thus providing one of the largest collections language translations of foreign scientific and of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. Results are published in both non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Specialized services also include creating custom includes the following report types: thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of completed research or a major significant phase For more information about the NASA STI of research that present the results of NASA program, see the following: programs and include extensive data or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations of significant • Access the NASA STI program home page at scientific and technical data and information http://www.sti.nasa.gov deemed to be of continuing reference value. NASA counterpart of peer-reviewed formal • E-mail your question to [email protected] professional papers but has less stringent limitations on manuscript length and extent of • Fax your question to the NASA STI graphic presentations. Information Desk at 443–757–5803 • TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific • Phone the NASA STI Information Desk at and technical findings that are preliminary or 443–757–5802 of specialized interest, e.g., quick release reports, working papers, and bibliographies that • Write to: contain minimal annotation. Does not contain STI Information Desk extensive analysis. NASA Center for AeroSpace Information 7115 Standard Drive • CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and Hanover, MD 21076–1320 technical findings by NASA-sponsored contractors and grantees. NASA/TM—2012-217823 Contamination Control Assessment of the World’s Largest Space Environment Simulation Chamber Aaron Snyder, Michael W. Henry, and Stanley P. Grisnik Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Stephen M. Sinclair Sierra Lobo, Inc., Fremont, Ohio Prepared for the 27th Space Simulation Conference cosponsored by the IEST, NASA, CSA, AIAA, ASTM, and JHU/APL Annapolis, Maryland, November 5–8, 2012 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 December 2012 Trade names and trademarks are used in this report for identification only. Their usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Level of Review: This material has been technically reviewed by technical management. Available from NASA Center for Aerospace Information National Technical Information Service 7115 Standard Drive 5301 Shawnee Road Hanover, MD 21076–1320 Alexandria, VA 22312 Available electronically at http://www.sti.nasa.gov Contamination Control Assessment of the World’s Largest Space Environment Simulation Chamber Aaron Snyder, Michael W. Henry, and Stanley P. Grisnik National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135 Stephen M. Sinclair Sierra Lobo, Inc. Fremont, Ohio 43420 Abstract The Space Power Facility’s thermal vacuum test chamber is the largest chamber in the world capable of providing an environment for space simulation. To improve performance and meet stringent requirements of a wide customer base, significant modifications were made to the vacuum chamber. These include major changes to the vacuum system and numerous enhancements to the chamber’s unique polar crane, with a goal of providing high cleanliness levels. The significance of these changes and modifications are discussed in this paper. In addition, the composition and arrangement of the pumping system and its impact on molecular back-streaming are discussed in detail. Molecular contamination measurements obtained with a TQCM and witness wafers during two recent integrated system tests of the chamber are presented and discussed. Finally, a concluding remarks section is presented. Introduction This paper presents aspects of contamination control in the Space Power Facility (SPF) thermal vacuum test chamber. This test chamber is the largest chamber in the world capable of providing an environment for space simulation. SPF is located at the NASA Glenn Research Center’s Plum Brook Station near Sandusky, Ohio. The thermal vacuum chamber has a rich heritage, in large part by being able to accommodate a wide range of testing environments, ranging from ambient pressures and temperatures of launch, through ascent, to the extreme low pressures and widely fluctuating temperatures occurring in space. The facility was designed and constructed to test both nuclear and non-nuclear space hardware in a simulated low- Earth-orbit environment. Although the facility was designed for testing nuclear hardware, only non- nuclear tests have been performed throughout its history. Some of the test programs that have been performed at the facility include high-energy experiments, rocket-fairing separation tests, Mars Lander system tests, deployable Solar Sail tests and International Space Station hardware tests. The large chamber size accommodates both small and bulky test article configurations. With the additions of two new testing facilities within SPF, adding world-class vibration and acoustic capability, the thermal vacuum chamber is the cornerstone of a comprehensive facility for conducting a variety of ground- based tests. The SPF Facility layout, shown in Figure 1, is ideal for performing multiple test programs. The facility has two large high bay areas adjacent to either side of the vacuum chamber. The advantage of having both areas available is that it accommodates the undertaking of two complex test programs. For example, one test can be prepared in a high bay while another test is being conducted in the vacuum test chamber. Large chamber doors provide access to the test chamber from either high bay. The test chamber is enclosed inside a larger concrete vacuum chamber. NASA/TM—2012-217823 1 Figure 1.—Solid model view of SPF’s thermal-vacuum chamber. For thermal-vacuum testing, the SPF has a cryoshroud that is being structurally modified for use in a vertical configuration, as illustrated in Figure 2, rather than in a horizontal Quonset-hut like configuration as most recently deployed. The vertical orientation allows it to enclose tall test articles. In order to provide access in this orientation, it will be able to open and close at either end in a clam-shell fashion. The thermal environment range provided by the cryoshroud will be approximately –157 to 66 °C (–250 to 150 °F). Background contamination produced by the chamber can significantly degrade the inherent capability of even a well-designed and contaminant-free shroud to provide a clean environment. To minimize background contamination, significant changes and modifications were made to improve vacuum chamber performance. For many of these improvements, emphasis was placed on meeting requirements of a wider customer base, particularly those having stringent contamination control requirements. These alterations include major changes to the large and complex vacuum-pumping system and numerous enhancements to the chamber’s unique polar crane. In addition to hardware and material improvements, a thorough cleaning of the test chamber was performed in the year 2007 by a commercial vendor to remove existing contaminants such as diffusion pump oil. Diffusion pumps are not a component of the current pumping system. Recently, two system integration tests were conducted at high vacuum, which provided key opportunities to establish chamber background levels of molecular contamination. It was intended that contamination results obtained during these system integration tests serve not only as a basis to characterize empty chamber cleanliness but also to establish a reference characterization to judge contamination issues pertaining to testing with the cryoshroud in place. It should be emphasized that the test chamber results presented in this paper are for vacuum testing without the cryoshroud placed in the chamber. NASA/TM—2012-217823 2 Figure 2.—Solid model view of the thermal-vacuum chamber with cryoshroud in place. The main body of this paper is outlined as follows. First, brief descriptions of the concrete enclosure and test chamber are given. Second, the composition and arrangement of the current pumping systems are reviewed. This review
Recommended publications
  • Improving a Low-Cost Thermal-Vac Chamber for Testing Stratospheric
    Improving a Low-Cost Thermal-Vac Chamber for Testing Stratospheric Ballooning Payloads Jacob Meyer, Billy Straub, and James Flaten University of Minnesota – Twin Cities Keywords: thermal-vac, chamber, environmental, stratospheric, ballooning Abstract: Building “near-space” payloads and lofting them into the stratosphere on weather balloon flights is far less expensive than launching payloads into outer space using rockets. However, even weather balloon flights can feel costly and be time-consuming, especially in educational contexts. Hence it is best for payloads to be ground-tested as rigorously as possible before flight, to identify (and remedy) potential failures. One particularly useful device for simultaneously exposing payloads to the low temperatures and low pressures they will experience on a stratospheric balloon flight is a thermal-vacuum chamber (called a thermal-vac for short), such as the home-built “High Altitude Chamber” reported on by Howard Brooks of DePauw University. Using such a chamber, one can “bring the stratosphere (at least its low pressure and low temperature characteristics) into a lab or classroom” before deploying hardware and expending consumable resources on potentially- unsuccessful flight tests. This paper discusses our experiences constructing, then making various modifications to, Brooks’ thermal-vac chamber. While maintaining low cost, we were able to reach lower pressures and lower temperatures than Brooks reported, in part by using aluminum endplates (rather than Lexan) and by using dry-ice cooling (rather than deep-freezer cooling). We also used removable rubber gaskets for sealing the chamber and used simple metal feed-throughs to supply power to internal components from an external DC power supply to reduce the number of batteries depleted during thermal-vac testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Suit Portable Life Support System 2.0 Unmanned Vacuum Environment Testing
    47th International Conference on Environmental Systems ICES-2017-105 16-20 July 2017, Charleston, South Carolina Space Suit Portable Life Support System 2.0 Unmanned Vacuum Environment Testing Carly Meginnis,1 Ian Anchondo,2 Marlon Cox3, and David Westheimer4 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, 77058 and Matthew Vogel 5 HX5, LLC., Houston, TX, 77058 For the first time in more than 30 years, an advanced space suit Portable Life Support System (PLSS) design was operated inside a vacuum chamber representative of the flight operating environment. The test article, PLSS 2.0, was the second system-level integrated prototype of the advanced PLSS design, following the PLSS 1.0 Breadboard that was developed and tested throughout 2011. Whereas PLSS 1.0 included five technology development components with the balance of the system simulated using commercial off-the- shelf items, PLSS 2.0 featured first generation or later prototypes for all components, less instrumentation, tubing, and fittings. Developed throughout 2012, PLSS 2.0 was the first attempt to package the system into a flight representative volume. PLSS 2.0 testing included an extensive functional evaluation known as Pre-Installation Acceptance testing, Human-in- the-Loop testing in which the PLSS 2.0 prototype was integrated via umbilicals to a manned prototype space suit for 19 2-hour simulated extravehicular activities (EVAs), and unmanned vacuum environment testing. Unmanned vacuum environment testing took place from 1/9/15-7/9/15 with PLSS 2.0 located inside a vacuum chamber. Test sequences included performance mapping of several components, carbon dioxide removal evaluations at simulated intravehicular activity conditions, a regulator pressure schedule assessment, and culminated with 25 simulated EVAs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Leakage of Large-Diameter O-Ring Seals on Spacecraft Airlock Hatches
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19680008029 2020-03-23T23:45:28+00:00Z I CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NASA Technical Reports Server NASA TECHNICAL NOTE --NASA TN D-4394 cite , / d o* m mP AN INVESTIGATION OF LEAKAGE OF LARGE-DIMETER O-RING SEALS ON SPACECRAFT AIR-LOCK HATCHES , . ._,-.. by Otto F. Troutj Jre LangZey Research Center Langley Station, Hampton, Va* NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. MARCH 1968 TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM AN INVESTIGATION OF LEAKAGE OF LARGE-DIAMETER O-RING SEALS ON SPACECRAFT AIR-LOCK HATCHES By Otto F. Trout, Jr. Langley Research Center Langley Station, Hampton, Va. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ~ For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - CFSTI price $3.00 I 111- AN INVESTIGATION OF LEAKAGE OF LARGE-DIAMETER O-RING SEALS ON SPACECRAFT AIR-LOCK HATCHES By Otto F. Trout, Jr. Langley Research Center SUMMARY An investigation has been conducted to determine the leakage of large-diameter O-ring seals for operable hatch doors and static joints with a vacuum of 1.0 X torr (1.33 X lov2 N/m2) on one side and atmospheric pressure on the other. The measuring techniques employed made it possible to determine the leakage of any hatch component of an air-lock system. Tests of O-ring seals 28 to 30 inches (0.71 to 0.76 meter) in diameter have indicated that helium leakages of less than 1.0 X lom5cc/sec (STP) are attainable with butyl, viton, and neoprene elastomers for operable hatch doors and static seals.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Thermal and Vacuum Environment Simulation
    DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.73154 ProvisionalChapter chapter 2 Space Thermal and Vacuum Environment Simulation Roy Stevenson SolerSoler ChisabasChisabas,, Geilson Loureiro and Carlos de Oliveira Lino Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73154 Abstract The space simulation chambers are systems used to recreate as closely as possible the thermal environmental conditions that spacecraft experience in space, as well as also serve to space components qualification and material research used in spacecraft. These systems analyze spacecraft behavior, evaluating its thermal balance, and functionalities to ensure mission success and survivability. The objective of this chapter is to give a broad overview on space simulation chambers, describe which are the environmental parameters of space that can be simulated in this type of ground test facilities, types of the space environment simulators, class of phenomena generated inside, and the techno- logical evolution of these systems from its conception. This chapter describes the basic systems and devices that compose the space simulation chambers. Keywords: space environment simulation, space simulation chamber, thermal vacuum chamber 1. Introduction The spacecrafts are developed for various applications such as space science, navigation, communications, technology testing and verification, earth observation, weather observation, military applications, human space flight, planetary exploration, and others [1]. According to the type of mission destined to fulfill by the spacecraft, it is possible to classify them into sev- eral types such as Flyby spacecraft, Orbiter spacecraft, Atmospheric spacecraft, Lander space- craft, Rover spacecraft, Penetrator spacecraft, Observatory spacecraft, and Communications spacecraft [2]. © 2016 The Author(s). Licensee InTech.
    [Show full text]
  • Usi/Scientif I C 61 ~Eichnical Inf Omation Diviaioa Attention8 ~ I S E
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Wnm~roton,D.C. 20116 TO: uSI/Scientif ic 61 ~eichnicalInf omation Diviaioa Attention8 ~iseWinnia M. Morganc FROM: ~~/0fficeof Assi$tapt General Chsel for Patent Matters SUBJECT: Annouicement of NASA-Owned U. 8. Patents in STAR In accordance with the procedures agreed upon by Code GP and Code USI, the attached NASA-owned U. S,,,Patent is being forwarded for abstracting and announcement in NASA STAR. ' 0 me iollowing information &a 'I;~:~v&d=d~ U. S. Patent No. Government or Corporate Employee Supplementary Corporate Source (if applicable) t /Yng NASA Patent Case No. NOTE - If this patent covers an invention made by a corporate ; employee of a NASA Contractor, the following is applicable: yes 0 NO Pursuant to Section 30S(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act, the name of the Admninistrator of NASA appears on the first page of the patent; however, the name of the actual inventor (author) appears at the headirrg of Col\nan no, 1 of the Specification, following the word8 . -.. with reopect te ., - , ' - -- -- - - 8, - -- L" - -- - I Enclosuze C1 (CODE) t I Oct. 20, 1970 SPACE ENVIRONMENTAL WORK SIMULATOR Filed Feb. 23, 1968 3,534,485 United States Patent Ofice .=,,, ,,,, apparatus and method for simulating the hard vacuum 3,534,485 conditions of outer space in a terrestrial environment. G.ENvIR(dNlbaENTAE Simpson, WORKand HillSmULAToW Walker, This and other objects will become more apparent when Guntersviliie, assignors to the united statesof considering the detailed description of the invention which Amedca as represented by the Administrator of the 5 hereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Leakage of Large-Diameter O-Ring Seals on Spacecraft Airlock Hatches
    I NASA TECHNICAL NOTE --NASA TN D-4394 cite , / d o* m mP AN INVESTIGATION OF LEAKAGE OF LARGE-DIMETER O-RING SEALS ON SPACECRAFT AIR-LOCK HATCHES , . ._,-.. by Otto F. Troutj Jre LangZey Research Center Langley Station, Hampton, Va* NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D. C. MARCH 1968 TECH LIBRARY KAFB, NM AN INVESTIGATION OF LEAKAGE OF LARGE-DIAMETER O-RING SEALS ON SPACECRAFT AIR-LOCK HATCHES By Otto F. Trout, Jr. Langley Research Center Langley Station, Hampton, Va. NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ~ For sale by the Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information Springfield, Virginia 22151 - CFSTI price $3.00 I 111- AN INVESTIGATION OF LEAKAGE OF LARGE-DIAMETER O-RING SEALS ON SPACECRAFT AIR-LOCK HATCHES By Otto F. Trout, Jr. Langley Research Center SUMMARY An investigation has been conducted to determine the leakage of large-diameter O-ring seals for operable hatch doors and static joints with a vacuum of 1.0 X torr (1.33 X lov2 N/m2) on one side and atmospheric pressure on the other. The measuring techniques employed made it possible to determine the leakage of any hatch component of an air-lock system. Tests of O-ring seals 28 to 30 inches (0.71 to 0.76 meter) in diameter have indicated that helium leakages of less than 1.0 X lom5cc/sec (STP) are attainable with butyl, viton, and neoprene elastomers for operable hatch doors and static seals. Silicone elastomeric O-rings allowed considerably greater leakages. The results indicate that the leakage of O-ring seals is sufficiently low for atmospheric containment on manned spacecraft under the conditions of this investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Refurbished and 3D Modeled Thermal Vacuum Chamber
    REFURBISHED AND 3D MODELED THERMAL VACUUM CHAMBER A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering by Lauren M. Glenn March 2017 © 2017 Lauren M. Glenn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Refurbished and 3D Modeled Thermal Vacuum Chamber AUTHOR: Lauren M. Glenn DATE SUBMITTED: March 2017 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Kira Abercromby, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering COMMITTEE MEMBER: David Marshall, Ph.D. Professor of Aerospace Engineering COMMITTEE MEMBER: Jordi Puig-Suari, Ph.D Professor of Aerospace Engineering COMMITTEE MEMBER: Roland Coelho VP Launch Services, Tyvak NanoSatellite Systems iii ABSTRACT Refurbished and 3D Modeled Thermal Vacuum Chamber Lauren M. Glenn Spacecraft testing includes acoustics, vibrations, and thermal vacuum. Cal Poly’s Space Environments Lab is equipped with multiple vacuum chambers, but no thermal vacuum chamber. The purpose of this thesis is to incorporate an ATS Chiller system with the HVEC vacuum chamber so students are able to experiment with a thermal vacuum chamber. The ATS Chiller had leaky pipes that needed to be refurbished and a shroud was implemented to improve thermal capabilities of the system. The full system was able to reach temperatures as low as -38ºC and as high as 58ºC at a pressure of 10-6 Torr. The ATS Chiller was able to absorb up to 500W of heat dissipation from a component mounted to the platen inside of the vacuum chamber. Thermal modeling of the apparatus was performed in Thermal Desktop. The model was incorporated with the test data to extract interface resistance information between connected surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do We Really Need Pressure Suits?
    GRADES 5–12 Why Do We Really Need Pressure Suits? Physical Science Lessons on Temperature, Pressure, Density, and Human Survival at High Altitudes Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate Museum in a BO SerieXs www.nasa.gov MUSEUM IN A BOX About This Guide This curriculum guide is broken down into several sections in order to make it easier to use and easier to find lessons and activities you need for your classroom. Each lesson can be completed as a stand-alone lesson made up of several activities or can be combined with any or all of the other lessons within this guide. The background information applies to all les- sons and activities. Due to the interrelated nature of temperature, pressure, and density, some activities in one category explain several concepts simultaneously but were placed in the lesson that seemed to be most applicable to the concept being taught. Overall, in addition to the physical science nature of the lessons within this guide, there is an additional focus on human survival within temperature, pressure, and density parameters. Introduction Lessons are broken down as follows: • Pressure Lesson One: Survival in a Vacuum o Four activities • Pressure Lesson Two: Air Has Pressure o Three activities • Temperature Lesson: Can Water Boil Without Heat? o Four activities • Density Lesson: How To See Density o Two activities Table of Contents Background........................................................................................................................................................................ 2
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do We Really Need Pressure Suits?
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration GRADES 5-12 Why Do We Really Need Pressure Suits? Physical Science Lessons on Temperature, Pressure, Density, and Human Survival at High Altitudes Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate Museum in a BO SerieXs www.nasa.gov MUSEUM IN A BOX About This Guide This curriculum guide is broken down into several sections in order to make it easier to use and easier to find lessons and activities you need for your classroom. Each lesson can be completed as a stand-alone lesson made up of several activities or can be combined with any or all of the other lessons within this guide. The background information applies to all les- sons and activities. Due to the interrelated nature of temperature, pressure, and density, some activities in one category explain several concepts simultaneously but were placed in the lesson that seemed to be most applicable to the concept being taught. Overall, in addition to the physical science nature of the lessons within this guide, there is an additional focus on human survival within temperature, pressure, and density parameters. Introduction Lessons are broken down as follows: • Pressure Lesson One: Survival in a Vacuum - Four activities • Pressure Lesson Two: Air Has Pressure - Three activities • Temperature Lesson: Can Water Boil Without Heat? - Four activities • Density Lesson: How To See Density - Two activities structures and materials 2 Table of Contents Background ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]