DOCSLIB.ORG

Dinner Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dinner Journal Inauguration of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court and Dinner in Honor of Judge Conner onn . C er C I m N a N i l o l f i C W o . u N r O t H I P N e 8 w 00 York 2 January 15, 2009 The Union League Club of New York Dinner in Honor of Judge William C. Conner January 15, 2009 The Union League Club, Manhattan Mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court The mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court is to promote excellence in professionalism, ethics, civility, and legal skills for judges, lawyers, academicians, and students of law and to advance the education of the members of the Inn, the members of the bench and bar, and the public in the fields of intellectual property law. Program Cocktail Reception • 6:00 pm Dinner • 7:00 pm Presentations Welcome Anthony Giaccio Remarks Chief Judge Paul R. Michel, Federal Circuit Presentation of Charter Judge Richard Linn, Federal Circuit Tribute to Judge Conner Judge Barbara S. Jones and Judge Colleen McMahon, Southern District of New York t t t Dinner Committee Chair Thomas Meloro Commemorative Journal Chair Dale Carlson Message from Conner Inn Executive Committee Chair t is a great pleasure for me to welcome ev- I also want to thank the other members of I eryone this evening to this Inauguration of the Executive Committee of the Conner Inn, the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court and Melvin Garner, John Lane, and Thomas Meloro, Dinner in Honor of Judge Conner. It is both for their support and selfless dedication of professionally and personally rewarding to time and energy in establishing this new Inn of see the overwhelming enthusiastic response Court in a few short months; Dale Carlson for within our IP community in New York to the putting together this commemorative journal; formation of this intellectual property focused the leadership of the Linn Inn Alliance and of American Inn of Court. the six other intellectual property focused Inns The easiest task in setting up this new Inn of Court around the country for their encour- of Court was finding the right name. Judge agement and support; the NYIPLA for its co- Conner has been a friend and mentor to the sponsorship of this event; and the American intellectual property community and has gen- Inns of Court Foundation, particularly Execu- erously shared his talents and passion for tive Director BG David Carey, USA (Ret.) (a.k.a. Intellectual Property Law over the years as a “the General”) and Director of Chapter Rela- practicing patent attorney, as a President of tions for the Northeast Region, Lisa Chapin, the New York Intellectual Property Law Asso- for making the formation of a new American ciation (1972-73), and as a United States Dis- Inn of Court as painless as possible. trict Court Judge (since Jan. 1974). We greatly As you turn the pages of this commemora- appreciate his agreeing to allow us to use his tive journal, I hope that you will enjoy the trib- name for our new Inn of Court. utes to Judge Conner and will take note of the We also greatly appreciate the efforts and sense of community, both locally and nation- support of several other members of the judi- ally, that he has fostered over his career. We ciary who helped make this Conner Inn a real- look forward to advancing the values of civil- ity: Judge Richard Linn of the Federal Circuit ity, ethics, and professionalism, which Judge for his vision, leadership and dedication to Conner exemplifies, in the IP community for spreading the Inn of Court experience across many years to come. the country; Judge Barbara Jones of the South- By Anthony Giaccio, ern District of New York for her dedication to Executive Committee Chair the Inn of Court experience and her commit- ment to making the Conner Inn a success as its first President; Judges Richard Berman, Colleen McMahon, Stephen Robinson and retired Mag- istrate Judge Mark Fox of the Southern District of New York for their interest in participating in our Conner Inn; Chief Judge Paul Michel and Judges Timothy Dyk, Richard Linn, and Pau- line Newman of the Federal Circuit for their interest in participating as visiting members of the judiciary; and each of the Judges from the Southern District of New York and the Second Circuit for joining us this evening to celebrate the formation of the Conner Inn and to honor Judge Conner. The Conner Inn Leadership Officers and Executive Committee Officers President Hon. Barbara S. Jones Southern District of New York Counselor Hon. Colleen McMahon Southern District of New York Secretary/Treasurer Anthony Giaccio Executive Committee Chair Anthony Giaccio Members Melvin Garner John Lane Thomas Meloro Distinguished Judicial Members of the Inn Hon. William C. Conner, Southern District of New York Judicial Members of the Inn Hon. Richard M. Berman, Southern District of New York Hon. Barbara S. Jones, Southern District of New York Hon. Colleen McMahon, Southern District of New York Hon. Stephen C. Robinson, Southern District of New York Hon. Mark Fox, Magistrate Judge (Ret.), Southern District of New York Visiting Judicial Members of the Inn Hon. Paul R. Michel, Chief, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Hon. Timothy B. Dyk, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Hon. Richard Linn, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Hon. Pauline Newman, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Message from Chief Judge Paul R. Michel, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit our Honoree tonight, Judge William C. Conner, gives your new Inn its Y distinctive name. He is himself an attorney and judge of great distinc- tion. In at least one respect this distinction is unique. As far as I can de- termine, Judge Conner is the only District Judge of the 650 in the United States who previously worked as a patent litigator. Before his appointment in December 1973, he practiced patent litigation for 27 years here in New York City. In addition to nearly three decades of distinguished service to cli- ents of the firm of Curtis, Morris & Safford, Judge Conner led the patent bar here, serving immediately before his judicial appointment as the President of the New York Patent Law Association. His tenure on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York exceeds even that of his private practice and will soon reach 36 years. When combined with his World War II naval service in the South Pacific, he has served the country for nearly 40 years – a record of distinguished achievement, generosity, leadership, and steadfastness. Although he was duly recognized in 1973 with the Jefferson Medal and in 2003 with the first Outstanding Public Service Award by the New York Intellectual Property Association, I doubt anything else tops having an Inn of the Court named in your honor. His career as litigator and judge has spanned the technology revo- lution in America. In 1941, he completed his degree in electrical engineer- ing, followed by a law degree in 1942, both at the University of Texas. He immediately put the first discipline to use as an electronics officer aboard the aircraft carriers USS Enterprise and USS Lexington, and the second, starting in 1946, in private patent practice. Such cross-training in technol- ogy and law recently has become common, but in the 1940’s, it was virtu- ally unknown. Judge Conner was a pioneer. One wonders if any classmate in his public school in Arlington, Texas in the 1930’s could have imagined Bill Conner would relocate to New York City and become a famous lawyer and then a revered judge. They certainly could not have guessed he would have an association of distin- guished intellectual property lawyers’ named in his honor. Like all true leaders, he quietly goes about doing his work with high standards and high skill as if that were nothing special. Tellingly, he never talks about himself, but often about the law. He has influenced countless lawyers and judges in his modest, but powerful fashion including Yours Truly. In an age of shallow celebrities and fake leaders, he is the true item, the real McCoy. He leads not with words, but actions, talking not with bra- vado, but care, frankness and humor. He shares what he knows, which is plenty, and inspires others to go and do likewise. I can think of few law professors who can teach as Judge Conner does, in his unassuming way, about how law works and justice is administered. What better personification of the ideals behind every American Inn of Court. How fortunate the Conner Inn is to have his example, and how fitting for him to receive this well-deserved recognition. Congratulations to Judge Conner and to your new Inn! Paul R. Michel Chief Judge United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit January 15, 2009. Honored Guests SPECIAL GUESTS OF HONOR Hon. William C. Conner Mrs. Janice F. Conner UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEAL Federal Circuit Hon. Paul R. Michel, Chief Judge Hon. Timothy B. Dyk, Circuit Judge Hon. Richard Linn, Circuit Judge Hon. Pauline Newman, Circuit Judge Second Circuit Hon. Dennis Jacobs, Chief Judge Hon. Wilfred Feinberg, Senior Circuit Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS Southern District of New York Hon. Kimba M. Wood, Chief Judge Hon. Harold Baer, Jr., Senior District Judge Hon. Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, Senior District Judge Hon. Denny Chin, District Judge, Southern District Hon. William C. Conner, Senior District Judge Hon. Thomas P. Griesa, Senior District Judge Hon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019-2020 Linn Inn Handbook V2.Pdf
    Contains Confidential Information. Do Not Distribute. The Richard Linn American Inn of Court 2019-2020 Membership Handbook www.linninn.org © 2019 Richard Linn American Inn of Court. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Message From The President ..................................................................................... 1 Meeting Dates and Logistics ...................................................................................... 3 Member Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 6 Officers and Administrators ....................................................................................... 8 2019-2020 Program Schedule .................................................................................... 9 The Richard Linn American Inn of Court ...............................................................10 2019-2020 Membership & Dues Form ...............................................................10 Origins of the Mark T. Banner Scholarship .........................................................16 Diversity ...................................................................................................................17 Background ..............................................................................................................19 The American Inns of Court .................................................................................19 The Richard Linn American Inn of Court ............................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Web 2007-2008 Greenbook.Indd
    2007/2008 GREENBOOK THE NEW YORK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION, INC. HE ASSOCIATION IS ESTABLISHED TO MAINTAIN THE HONOR AND DIGNITY OF THE LAW OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS“T AND COPYRIGHTS; TO PROMOTE THE DEVEL- OPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION THEREOF; TO ADVANCE THE EDUCATION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BAR AND THE PUBLIC IN THOSE FIELDS OF LAW, AND TO COOPERATE WITH FOREIGN ASSOCIATIONS IN HARMONIZING THE SUBSTANCE AND INTERPRETATION OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.” - BYLAWS, ARTICLE II MEMBER NATIONAL COUNCIL OF PATENT LAW ASSOCIATIONS i The GREENBOOK constitutes a review of the period from June 2006 through December 1, 2007. The closing date for inclusion of new members was February 1, 2008, and for changes to membership contact information was December 1, 2007. If any member wishes to update his or her contact information, please e-mail the Association at [email protected] with the updated information, and designate the subject line as “Contact Information”. © 2008 by The New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Inc. All rights reserved. ii EDITORIAL STAFF • EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Ashe P. Puri GREENBOOK EDITOR Stephen J. Quigley THE ASSOCIATION’S SECRETARY Charles R. Hoffmann • Executive Office of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Inc. 485 Kinderkamack Road, 2nd Floor Oradell, New Jersey 07649 Phone: 201-634-1870 Fax: 201-634-1871 General e-mail: [email protected] iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PAGE Section 1 Officers; Board of Directors ..........................................3 Section
    [Show full text]
  • Are Storylines Patentable? Testing the Boundaries of Patentable Subject Matter
    Fordham Law Review Volume 76 Issue 6 Article 13 2008 Are Storylines Patentable? Testing the Boundaries of Patentable Subject Matter Anu R. Sawkar Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anu R. Sawkar, Are Storylines Patentable? Testing the Boundaries of Patentable Subject Matter, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 3001 (2008). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol76/iss6/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Are Storylines Patentable? Testing the Boundaries of Patentable Subject Matter Cover Page Footnote J.D. Candidate, 2009, Fordham University School of Law; Ph.D., 2005, The Scripps Institute; B.A., 2000, Northwestern University. I would like to thank Professor Jeanne C. Fromer and Raymond C. Woodring for their invaluable support and comments. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol76/iss6/13 ARE STORYLINES PATENTABLE? TESTING THE BOUNDARIES OF PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER Anu R. Sawkar* This Note examines doctrinal issues relating to the patentability of nonphysical inventions by assessing a proposal to patent storylinesfor use in books and movies. Analyzing recent and historical case law regarding the limits of patentable subject matter, this Note identifies four points of doctrinal tension whose resolution will determine the extent to which nonphysical inventions, such as the storyline proposal, arepatentable.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipil/Houston
    SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO, summer home of IPIL’s annual National Conference IPIL/HOUSTON HOUSTON, TEXAS, home base of the Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Dean’s Message ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 RaspBerry ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 A Learning Center at an International Crossroads ................................................................. 2 Degree Offerings ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Principal Faculty ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Affiliated Faculty ................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Adjunct Faculty ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 IPIL Courses Typically Offered .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Reform, Then and Now
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Southern Methodist University PATENT REFORM, THEN AND NOW David O. Taylor* 2019 MICH. ST. L. REV. 431 ABSTRACT One of the most significant legislative reforms of the U.S. patent system occurred in 1952. Prior to 1952, the patent system found itself languishing, undermined by a confusing nonstatutory patentability requirement called the “invention” requirement. In 1952, Congress and the President eliminated it. Today we find ourselves in a situation surprisingly similar to the one prior to 1952. The patent system again finds itself languishing, undermined by a new confusing nonstatutory patentability requirement, this one called the “inventive concept” requirement. Today, just like in 1952, there are ongoing calls for Congress and the President to eliminate it. Given the striking parallels between these two eras—and the success of legislative reform efforts in 1952—I have studied the forces behind the reform of 1952: the problems with the law of the day, the people and groups of people involved in reform efforts, and the circumstances and strategies they used to their advantage to create change. This study has led me to identify various factors that led to the success of those efforts in 1952. In parallel with the study of the history behind the Patent Act of 1952, I highlight the problems with the law today, the people and groups of people involved today in reform efforts, and the circumstances and strategies they might use to their advantage to create change. Moreover, drawing from the factors that led to the success of legislative reform efforts in 1952, I analyze how those same factors may contribute to the success of current legislative reform efforts—or hinder it.
    [Show full text]
  • PANEL I: the End of Equivalents? Examining the Fallout from Festo
    Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 13 Volume XIII Number 3 Volume XIII Book 3 Article 1 2003 PANEL I: The End of Equivalents? Examining the Fallout from Festo J. Michael Jakes Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner Herbert Michael Schwartz Fish & Neave Harold C. Wegner Foley & Lardner Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation J. Michael Jakes, Herbert Michael Schwartz, and Harold C. Wegner, PANEL I: The End of Equivalents? Examining the Fallout from Festo, 13 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 727 (2003). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol13/iss3/1 This Transcript is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 4 - PANEL I FORMAT 5/30/03 7:56 AM PANEL I: The End of Equivalents? Examining the Fallout from Festo Moderator: John Richards* Panelists: J. Michael Jakes† Herbert Schwartz‡ Harold C. Wegner§ PROFESSOR RICHARDS: Thank you, Dean Treanor. What we are going to do first is have opening statements from each of our panelists here. They are going to talk for ten minutes or so on their views of the Festo situation, and then we are going to open up into a general discussion, and those in the audience who feel they want to contribute are heartily encouraged to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge William C
    Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court Reception and Dinner onn . C er C I m N a N i l o l f i C W o . u N r O t H I P N e 8 w 00 York 2 January 17, 2018 The Union League Club of New York Judge William C. Conner Mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court The mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court is to promote excellence in professionalism, ethics, civility, and legal skills for judges, lawyers, academicians, and students of law and to advance the education of the members of the Inn, the members of the bench and bar, and the public in the fields of intellectual property law. At our Inaugural Dinner in 2009, we presented Mrs. Conner with a bouquet of her favorite flowers - yellow roses. Honorable William C. Conner passed away on July 9, 2009. His wife, Janice Files Conner, passed away on September 12, 2011. We continue to commemorate Mrs. Conner every year with yellow roses on the tables at our Annual Dinner. Program Reception • 6:00 pm Dinner • 7:00 pm Presentations 2018 Conner Inn Justice Awards to Distingished Senior Judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and U.S. District for the Southern District of New York 2018 Conner Inn Excellence Award to Hon. Pierre N. Leval Senior Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Presented by Hon. J. Paul Oetken District Judge, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Patenting Nature: a Problem of History Christopher Beauchamp Brooklyn Law School, [email protected]
    Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks Faculty Scholarship Winter 2013 Patenting Nature: A Problem of History Christopher Beauchamp Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation 16 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 257 (2013) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BrooklynWorks. STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2 WINTER 2013 PATENTING NATURE: A PROBLEM OF HISTORY Christopher Beauchamp* CITE AS: 16 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 257 (2013) http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/patentingnature.pdf ABSTRACT The practice of patenting genetic material is currently under sharp attack. Recent litigation has forced the courts to grapple with the doctrinal basis for patenting DNA sequences identical to those found in nature. Faced with conflicting authorities and difficult policy questions, courts have leaned heavily on history to guide—or at least to justify—their decisions. This article explores the history in question. It traces the patent law’s changing treatment of “products of nature” in an attempt to untangle the origins of present-day patentability arguments. The evidence suggests that the historical foundations of the bar on patenting products of nature are surprisingly shaky. The article also reveals how isolated biological materials first came to be patented. This task, I argue, requires looking not only to court decisions, but also to the history of patent practice. My principal vehicle for doing so is the case of Parke-Davis & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Linn Inn Alliance
    Contains Confidential Information. Do Not Distribute. The Richard Linn American Inn of Court 2020-2021 Membership Handbook www.linninn.org © 2020 Richard Linn American Inn of Court. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Message From The President ..................................................................................... 1 Meeting Dates and Logistics ...................................................................................... 3 Member Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 6 Officers and Administrators ....................................................................................... 8 2020-2021 Program Schedule .................................................................................... 9 The Richard Linn American Inn of Court ...............................................................10 2020-2021 Membership & Dues Form ...............................................................10 Mark T. Banner Scholarship ....................................................................................13 Origins of the Mark T. Banner Scholarship .........................................................16 Diversity ...................................................................................................................17 Hon. Arlander Keys Scholarship .............................................................................19 Background ..............................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Dinner Journal
    Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court Reception and Dinner January 18, 2011 The Union League Club of New York Judge William C. Conner Mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court The mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court is to promote excellence in professionalism, ethics, civility, and legal skills for judges, lawyers, academicians, and students of law and to advance the education of the members of the Inn, the members of the bench and bar, and the public in the fields of intellectual property law. Program w w w Cocktail Reception • 6:00 pm w w w w w w Dinner • 7:00 pm w w w w w w Welcome w w w Anthony Giaccio w w w Presentation w w w Conner Inn Excellence Award to Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit by Judge Barbara S. Jones United States District Court, Southern District of New York w w w Remarks w w w by Judge Richard Linn United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit w w w Dinner Committee Chairperson Jeffrey M. Butler Commemorative Journal Chairperson Jeffrey M. Butler Message from Conner Inn Executive Committee Chair elcome to the annual Reception and Dinner of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of WCourt. We are joined this evening at the Union League Club of New York by many honored guests, including distinguished members of the bench and bar. This evening, we will be presenting Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with the 2011 Conner Inn Excellence Award.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Circuit Justice
    Incorporating amendments to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 35 and 40. Updated to incorporate emergency amendment language for Fed. R. Cir. 15(f). United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Circuit Justice Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. Chief Judge Sharon Prost Circuit and Senior Circuit Judges Pauline Newman Kimberly A. Moore Haldane Robert Mayer Kathleen M. O’Malley S. Jay Plager Jimmie V. Reyna Alan D. Lourie Evan J. Wallach Raymond C. Clevenger, III Richard G. Taranto Alvin A. Schall Raymond T. Chen William C. Bryson Todd M. Hughes Richard Linn Kara F. Stoll Timothy B. Dyk Federal Circuit Rules of Practice (December 1, 2020) – UPDATE Page i Officers of the Court and Senior Staff Peter R. Marksteiner CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE AND CLERK OF COURT Jeffrey Goldberg Jarrett B. Perlow GENERAL COUNSEL CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Marilyn Wennes Patrick Barnwell SENIOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANT CHIEF DEPUTY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Jessica Perovich Riley Toussaint CIRCUIT LIBRARIAN DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Advisory Council Members Carter G. Phillips, Chair Matthias Kamber Leonard Davis (Ret.) Thomas W. Krause Tara D. Elliott Deanna Tanner Okun Michael R. Franzinger Kevin Parton Arthur J. Gajarsa (Ret.) Adam R. Shartzer Martin F. Hockey, Jr. Robert L. Stoll James F. Holderman (Ret.) David O. Taylor ex officio Peter R. Marksteiner George F. Hutchinson Jeffrey Goldberg Scott M. McCaleb Deborah M. Miron Michael J. Schaengold Sonal N. Mehta Jamie D. Underwood Federal Circuit Rules of Practice (December 1, 2020) – UPDATE Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ....................................................................................................................... xi Title I — Applicability of Rules ..................................................................................... 1 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 1 ...................................................................... 1 Scope of Rules; Definition; Title Federal Circuit Rule 1 ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Circuit Rules of Practice
    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit FEDERAL CIRCUIT RULES OF PRACTICE with Practice Notes and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure March 2016 Washington, DC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Circuit Justice The Chief Justice Chief Judge Hon. Sharon Prost Circuit and Senior Circuit Judges Hon. Pauline Newman Hon. Haldane Robert Mayer Hon. S. Jay Plager Hon. Alan D. Lourie Hon. Raymond C. Clevenger, III Hon. Alvin A. Schall Hon. William C. Bryson Hon. Richard Linn Hon. Timothy B. Dyk Hon. Kimberly A. Moore Hon. Kathleen M. O’Malley Hon. Jimmie V. Reyna Hon. Evan J. Wallach Hon. Richard G. Taranto Hon. Raymond T. Chen Hon. Todd M. Hughes Hon. Kara F. Stoll Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court Daniel E. O’Toole Officers of the Court & Senior Staff Senior Staff Attorney, J. Douglas Steere Senior Technical Attorney, Marilyn Wennes Circuit Librarian, John D. Moore Operations and Administrative Services, Dale Bosley Director of Information Technology and Chief Deputy Clerk of Court, Mona Harrington United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Rules of Practice, Revised: March 2016 1 Advisory Council Carter G. Phillips, Chair Tina M. Chappell The Honorable Leonard Davis (Retired) Tara D. Elliott David Folsom Susan Tsui Grundmann The Honorable James F. Holderman (Retired) Martin F. Hockey, Jr. Matthias Kamber Nathan K. Kelley Kevin Parton Robert L. Stoll Deanna Tanner Okun David O. Taylor John M. Whealan United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Rules of Practice, Revised: March 2016 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ............................................................................ 1 AMENDMENTS AND REVISIONS CONTAINED IN THIS EDITION ..................
    [Show full text]