Liberty Magazine January 2005
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters SUPRC Field
Suffolk University Virginia General Election Voters AREA N= 600 100% DC Area ........................................ 1 ( 1/ 98) 164 27% West ........................................... 2 51 9% Piedmont Valley ................................ 3 134 22% Richmond South ................................. 4 104 17% East ........................................... 5 147 25% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. We are calling Virginia households statewide. Would you be willing to spend three minutes answering some brief questions? <ROTATE> or someone in that household). N= 600 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/105) 600 100% GEND RECORD GENDER N= 600 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/106) 275 46% Female ......................................... 2 325 54% S2 S2. Thank You. How likely are you to vote in the Presidential Election on November 4th? N= 600 100% Very likely .................................... 1 ( 1/107) 583 97% Somewhat likely ................................ 2 17 3% Not very/Not at all likely ..................... 3 0 0% Other/Undecided/Refused ........................ 4 0 0% Q1 Q1. Which political party do you feel closest to - Democrat, Republican, or Independent? N= 600 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/110) 269 45% Republican ..................................... 2 188 31% Independent/Unaffiliated/Other ................. 3 141 24% Not registered -
December 2020 Edition
The Search for Brave Candidates While many people in the party were thrilled about having a by Amber Jewell candidate like Jo Jorgensen, many others were extremely disappointed. They believed her to be a cookie cutter Libertarians often candidate, put into place as a safe option – and several ridicule those who believed that she wasn’t even the best option with which to support the two-party play it safe. On the flip side, her running mate Spike Cohen system. They strongly was seen as a force to be reckoned with. His presence showed oppose the idea of a certain amount of strength through his passion and choosing “the lesser of communication that made him a great candidate. two evils” and use the oppositional argument As a third party, Libertarians have to work harder than the old against everyone who parties in order to be taken seriously. This has created a claims that a binary challenge in choosing candidates. Many candidates want to be choice is the only way. seen as boisterous so that they can draw attention to the LP in For example, in this past an effort to bring in more members. Others may only want to election, most people be “paper candidates,” not actively involved in campaigning, seemed to despise the just to get names on ballots. But choosing a serious candidate choices of Donald that does not reflect that same boring tactics as the Trump and Joe Biden; so, Libertarians tried vehemently to Republicans and Democrats can be tough. remind others that there are other options. -
A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936 -
September 2005 a Brief Schedule of Conference Is Grass Roots Activist Training Events the Main Track at the Week- Ceive a CD-ROM Resource Book
Lone Star Liberty The Official Monthly Newsletter of the Libertarian Party of Texas September 2005 A Brief Schedule of Conference is Grass Roots Activist Training Events The main track at the Week- ceive a CD-ROM resource book. end For Winners Conference is the In order to help keep the costs The Weekend for Winners will Grassroots Activist Training being pro- down in bringing the training to Texas, kickoff 6 p.m Friday, September 16 vided by the Leadership Institute. The it will be open to anyone, regardless with a reception at host hotel, Radisson Institute is providing professional train- of Party affiliation. As a result we are Town Lake in Austin. (Registration ers to come to Austin and provide two able to offer professional services for will open at 4 p.m.) The reception will full days of workshops for anyone in- just $100. feature light snacks and the live music terested in effective politics. Because candidates need pic- of Too Blue. (www.tooblue-austin- The training covers all aspects tures, we have arranged for Jayne band.com) of campaigning including fundraising, Allen, of Quintessence Photography, to Saturday's events begin bright outreach, issue development, presen- offer onsite non-copyright digital pho- and early at 8:30 a.m. You can choose tations, etc. Participants will also re- tographs. Track 1, Track 2, or if you are under 12 you can choose the Children's Pro- Track 2 Focus: Training, Issues & Outreach gram. See the neighboring articles and The professional activist train- On Sunday, Wes will host a page 2 for information. -
The Retriever, Issue 7, Volume 39
8 Opinion October 12, 2004 THE RETRIEVER Point Counterpoint Your ballot: Change or principle? The lesser of two evils is still evil JON BERNHARDT winning. PETER BESSMAN date you consider to be evil, regardless of the fact that Retriever Guest Writer In the real world, it would be nice if voting for Retriever Guest Writer that candidate isn’t as bad as his alternative, you are Ralph Nader would change things. I’m sure that’s still voting for a candidate that you don’t want in It’s a very simple question: when you vote at what he wants you to think. But that’s not what’s Voters disillusioned with the major party candi- office, but merely see as lesser form of evil. The effect the beginning of November, a few weeks from now, going to happen. This is a very important election. dates face an interesting paradox in third-party repre- is that you doom yourself to a perpetually evil leader- are you voting to make a point, or are you voting to We are in the middle of a global war. We cannot sentatives. On one hand, it’s not terribly uncommon ship. To truly vote tactically, you need to consider the make a change? afford to waste our votes. Does it sound like I’m try- to find people agree with a particular third party’s plat- time factor and remember that four years is too short I’ve heard a lot from people around campus ing to scare you back into line? Well, I am. -
In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Western Division
Case 3:04-cv-07724-JGC Document 14-1 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ______________________________ ) ANITA RIOS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 3:04-CV-7724 ) The Honorable James G. Carr J. KENNETH BLACKWELL, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiffs, seven of whom voted in Ohio for president of the United States, two of whom were presidential candidates in 2004, and one of which is a non-partisan, non- profit organization in Ohio committed to free and fair elections, respectfully oppose defendant Blackwell’s December 29, 2004 motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs request the Court to defer consideration of such motion until a determination is made whether the recount litigation now pending in the Southern District of Ohio, State Ex. Rel. Yost v. National Voting Rights Institute, Civ. No. C2-04-1139 (ES/TK) (hereinafter “Yost” case), should be transferred to this Court and consolidated with this action. Secretary Blackwell has on at least four occasions suggested in papers filed in the Yost case that the case should be Case 3:04-cv-07724-JGC Document 14-1 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 2 of 10 transferred to this Court and consolidated with this case, which was the first recount case filed.1 Moreover, as plaintiffs establish below, they have standing to pursue their constitutional right to a recount, and the issues raised in their complaint are not moot. In addition, plaintiffs have not abandoned their claims. -
2018 Awards Committee Report
2018 AWARDS COMMITTEE REPORT Submitted to: Libertarian National Committee, Apr. 17, 2018 Submitted by: James W. Lark, III Region 5 Representative, Libertarian National Committee Member, 2018 Awards Committee The members of the 2018 Awards Committee are Tim Hagan, Daniel Hayes, and Jim Lark; these members were elected by the LNC during the December 2017 meeting. It is likely two additional members will be elected during the upcoming LNC meeting in Denver. An article soliciting nominations for the 2018 awards appeared on LP.org on Mar. 30; the article is available at www.lp.org/call-nominations-2018-libertarian-party-awards/. A similar article will appear in the next issue of LP News. In addition, solicitations for nominations will be sent to the LP e-mail list; such a solicitation was sent on Apr. 12. Submissions should be sent to [email protected]. The deadline for submissions is 5:00 p.m. EDT on May 31. Please note that the committee has already received several nominations. Two awards ceremonies are scheduled to take place during the LP national convention. At this moment we are uncertain of the dates and times for the ceremonies. APPENDIX: Libertarian Party national award recipients and Hall of Liberty members 1996: Samuel Adams Award: Don Ernsberger Thomas Paine Award: Jacob Hornberger Thomas Jefferson Award: David Nolan 1998: Samuel Adams Award: Steve Dasbach Thomas Paine Award: Harry Browne Thomas Jefferson Award: David Bergland 2000: Samuel Adams Award: Richard Rider Thomas Paine Award: Michael Cloud Thomas Jefferson Award: Ed Clark -
The BG News October 27, 2004
Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU BG News (Student Newspaper) University Publications 10-27-2004 The BG News October 27, 2004 Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news Recommended Citation Bowling Green State University, "The BG News October 27, 2004" (2004). BG News (Student Newspaper). 7343. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news/7343 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in BG News (Student Newspaper) by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. State University WEDNESDAY October 27, 2004 NOT NEWS: Who is the better choice: Matt or PM SHOWERS HIGH 60 LOW: 44 Josh? Read our humor columns and decide; www.bgnews.com PAGE 5 dependent student press VOLUME 99 ISSUE 55 UAO hosts debate between parties Laura Collins question. During the course that and let their voices be heard. REPORTER of the debate, the crowd, made During the debate, the College it all started when UAO decid- up of mostly college students, Republicans said that the ed ID show 'Fahrenheit 9/11' a cheered, booed, applauded and Democrats arc running more of a week before the elections," said laughed. They were also asked to blame Bush first campaign, rath- David Scharfeld, a member of the settle down a few times by UAO er dian actually coming up with College Republicans. moderator, Bernard little, whose solutions themselves. They said UAO organized a debate joking comments seemed to ease Democrats are trying to scare between the College Democrats the tension in die room, at times. -
Shapiro Arato LLP ' O.Tiq ! R,
500 Fifth Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10110 tel: 212-257-48B0 tax:212-202r6417 •Jr.. sa Shapiro Arato LLP ' www.shapiroarato.com O.Tiq ! r, .- . r,-, Alexandra A.E. Shapiro 1 r: / [email protected] Direct; 212-257-4881 ClrPICr June 18,2015 VIA HAND DELIVERY Office of the General Counsel Federal Election Commission 999 E Street, N.W. MUR# Washington, D.C. 20463 Re: MUR 6869, In the Matter of the Commission on Presidential Debates, et al. To Whom It May Concern: We represent the Libertarian National Committee, Inc., which controls and manages the affairs of the United States Libertarian Party (the "Libertarian Party"). On its behalf, we respectfully request to join the Complaint against the Commissiori on Presidential Debates and certain of its directors, filed on behalf of Level the Playing Field and Peter Ackeiman In the Matter of the Commission on Presidential Debates, et al, MUR 6869. The Libertarian Party shares the views of Level the Playing Field and Dr. Ackerman that the Commission on Presidential Debates ("CPD") and certain of its directors (the "Named Directors") have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act and the Commission's regulations in connection with the CPD's hosting of general election presidential debates. The Libertarian Party asserts no new allegations, and instead incorporates fully the allegations against the CPD and the Named Directors set forth in the Complaint in MUR 6869. Accordingly, the Commission should permit the Libertarian Party to join the Complaint in MUR 6869 rather than initiating a new MUR and treating the Libertarian Party's request to join as a new administrative complaint. -
Professional Memo
LNC Meeting Minutes, February 26-27, 2005, Portland, OR To: Libertarian National Committee From: Bob Sullentrup CC: Joe Seehusen Date: 2/27/2005 Version last updated March 1, 2005. Attendance Attending the February 26-27, 2005 LNC meeting in Portland, OR were Officers: Michael Dixon, Lee Wrights, Mark Nelson, Bob Sullentrup At-Large Representatives: BetteRose Ryan, Adm. Michael Colley, Mark Rutherford, Rick McGinnis, Bill Redpath Regional Representatives: Dan Karlan, Ed Hock, Aaron Starr, M Carling, Dena Bruedigam, Jim Lark, George Squyres Regional Alternates: Tony Ryan filling in for Jeremy Keil; Chris Farris filling in for Michael Gilson deLemos; Emily Salvette, Scott Lieberman Executive Director Joe Seehusen. Also attending were Sean Haugh, Adam Mayer, Jessica Neno-Wilson, George Getz, Richard Burke, Phil Schmitt (OR), Glenn Tatum, Shane Cory, Rene Kimbal and her mother. The meeting commenced at 8:33. Moment of Reflection Chair Michael Dixon called for a moment of reflection which has been our practice at LNC meetings. 1 Public Comment Oregon’s chair Adam Mayer chair welcomed the LNC to Portland and noted that this was the first time the LNC visited the state. Oregon Executive Director Richard Burke welcomed the LNC to attend the evening’s festivities including dinner with locals and a reception at the home of Frank and Margie Dane. Credentials Report Secretary Bob Sullentrup confirmed the attendance of the members and alternates listed above. For completeness, the following table lists the composition of the current LNC as accepted -
Libertarians
Show Me FreedomTM The official publication of the Missouri Libertarian Party, The Party of Principle® Page 2 Page 4 Page 6 Page 10 Opinions on Fundamental La Sección History of the Voting Beliefs Española Libertarian Party Paid for by the Missouri Libertarian Party, Sean O’Toole Treasurer. www.lpmo.org Libertarians: None of the Above By Rick Vandeven reason that I joined the Libertarian Party, and ran three times (2010, 2012, There have been countless 2014) for US Representative (MO-8) words written attempting to on the Libertarian Party ticket. The describe what it means to be title of “candidate” afforded me “libertarian”. Some of these writings unique opportunities to advance the were composed by deep thinking cause of individual liberty. That is an philosophers who possessed such unfortunate reflection of a society great intellect and knowledge on the which places undeserved significance subject that newcomers approaching on those who hold titles, but it is also libertarianism are left feeling reality. frustrated in their honest attempt to An excellent reference as to grapple the concept. Other formal the nature of the Libertarian Party works authored by “experts” are so can be found in our Statement of right of others to live in whatever their consent. contradictory to libertarianism that the Principles... manner they choose. We, on the contrary, deny student reverts back to supporting the “We, the members of the Governments throughout the right of any government to duopoly establishment, or apathy. Libertarian Party, challenge the cult of history have regularly operated on do these things, and hold that By no means am I going the omnipotent state and defend the the opposite principle, that the State where governments exist, they to attempt to grab the mantle of rights of the individual. -
Frequently Asked Questions
Libertarian Party Presidential Nominating Convention Atlanta 2004 M I N U T E S Geoff Neale gaveled the Libertarian Party Presidential Nominating Convention to order at 10:12 on Friday, May 28, 2004 in Atlanta at the Marriott Marquis hotel following the keynote address by Dr. Mary Ruwart. Geoff introduced Gary Johnson, chair of the credentials committee. Credentials Committee Gary Johnson introduced the members of the committee, which included: Gary Johnson, chair Emily Salvette, secretary BetteRose Ryan Dena Brudigam Jack Tanner Rock Howard Chris Ferris James Hudler Ray Acosta Rich Maroney He then reviewed the criteria for validating delegates as outlined in the Party bylaws. On hand for this session were 465 delegates. Gerhard Langguth of Arkansas moved to postpone convention order of business item #4, retention of planks from the previous platform, until after order of business item #7, the platform committee report. Gerhard offered this as a means of allowing additional time for delegates to complete (and tabulate) their platform plank ballots. Libertarian Party Presidential Nominating Convention Minutes, Atlanta 2004 Page 1 of 41 The motion failed. Aaron Starr of California moved to suspend the rules eliminating order of business item #4 and accept all platform planks ratified in Indianapolis in 2002. The motion failed. A next motion proposed to accept all platform planks en masse by a voice vote. The motion failed. Ken Bisson of Virginia moved to accept the agenda as printed in the convention binder. This motion passed. Treasurer’s report Bill Redpath discussed the improving financial position of the Libertarian Party. Regrettably, at the end of 2003 liabilities exceeded assets by $200k.