2F44 , 'BER) = -(THPU)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

A SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF APPLICATIONS OF EARTH ORBITAL SPACE TECHNOLOGY TO SELECTED CASES IN WATER MANAGEMENT AND AGRICULTURE Volume II - Technical Report r4:produced by NTONA5 TECHNICAL 1NFORMATIONSEVCp"rgfild, Va 22151 PLANNING RESEARCH CORPORATION L ANGQRELES.OCALIMFORN1IA WAINGTO D C = (ACCES .2f44 , 'BER) = -(THPU) orEj (CODE) A SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF APPLICATIONS OF EARTH ORBITAL SPACE TECHNOLOGY TO SELECTED CASES IN WATER MANAGEMENT AND AGRICULTURE Volume II - Technical Report PRC R-1224 Revised November 1969 Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Admimstration Washington, D C Under Contract NASw-1816 By Planning Research Corporation gti)nNMNG PAGE BLANK NOT FITMBU FOREWORD This study has been completed in partial fulfillment of a request by the Bureau of the Budget to the National Aeronautics and Space Adnrnis­ tration (NASA) for a systems analysis of several specific applications of satellite-based remote sensing to earthbound problems. The study was funded and managed by the NASA Office of Space Science and Applications (OSSA) and was coordinated and revewed by the interagency Earth Re­ sources Survey Program Revew Committee (ERSPRC). The committee is chaired by a NASA representative and currently includes representa­ tives from U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Interior, Commerce, and Navy. The prime contractor, Planning Research Corporation (PRC) was assisted by the Willow Run Laboratories of the University of Michigan under a subcontract to supply technical data and judgments on sensor capabilities. The focus of the study was formulation and evaluation of feasible future operational system concepts for applying satellite-based remote sensing to improve the management of specific water resource and agricultural activities. These future operational concepts were assumed to follow the present research and development time frame of the NASA­ user agency Earth Resources Survey Program. It was recognized at the outset that considerable research and development would be required before any such future operational concepts could be realized. it was, however, the principal purpose of the study to assess the position that future operational space-assisted ERS systems concepts were of suf­ ficient promise to warrant rapid development of experimental Earth Observations satellites known as Earth Resources Technology Satellites (ERTS) The scope of the present study required emphasis on concepts for using space technology rather than on improvements not requiring assis­ tance from space. However, it was clear that any satellite-assisted information system concept should be compared with improvements not using satellites. In addition, it was expected that any system using satellites would support and complement many of the existing or planned ill user agency systems and procedures. Thus, while specific alternatives to satellite-assisted information systems were evaluated, the scope of this study did not permit evaluation of integration with all user agency systems or of all alternative programs available to the user agencies. This study does present a concept for a satellite assisted information system, an estimate of the expected costs along with the expected bene­ fits, and a comparison with some selected alternatives. As prime contractor, PRC wishes to express its appreciation to the organizations associated with ERSPRC for assistance through ready access to knowledgeable personnel who provided data and guidance vital to the success of the study. In the final phase of the work, ERSPRC (and its Benefits Studies Subcommittee) participated in a detailed review and criticism of the complete final report. This review, however, does not imply endorsement of the system configuration details or cost­ benefit dollar values. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are those of the contractor. The NASA Project Officers were Mr. J. Robert Porter and R. Robert A. Summers. The PRC Project Managers were Dr. Allen H. Muir and Mr. John F. Magnotti, Jr. The final report on this study is presented in two volumes. The full description of the work is contained in Volume II, Technical Report, and is supported by nine appendixes and a bibliography. The appendixes are the following Appendix A-User Sensor Model-Hydrology Appendix B-Hydrological Models Appendix C-System Operation and Benefits Appendix D-Satellite System Description and Costs Appendix E-Alternative Information Systems Appendix F-Noninformation Alternatives Appendix G-User Sensor Model-Agriculture Appendix H-Wheat Production Management Appendix I -Wheat Rust Control Volume I, Technical Summary, is a much briefer description of the significant aspects of the work Detailed descriptions of the calculations and procedures referred to in Volume I will be found in Volume II iv ABSTRACT A systems analysis of three of the many uses of space technology for earth applications was undertaken by the Planning Research Corpora­ tion The work followed a uniform methodology developed in an earlier report, PRC Technical Report R-1218 The case studies related to * The management of the regional demand and supply of water (emphasizing the generation of hydroelectric power, flood control, irrigation, and recreation) * The management of the world wheat crop (emphasizing the impact of fluctuations on the United States as the major exporter) o The control of wheat rust, a principal cause of wheat losses in the United States and abroad A conceptual system was designed that links user information needs to the specifications of satellite-borne sensors and the interpreta­ tion and dissemination of results to the users The satellite, sensors, communications, data processing, and dis­ semination system required will have to be supported by developmental research, however, it appears that no significant basic research in the hardware state-of-the-art will be necessary Proof of operational effec­ tiveness of the multispectral scanner, the multispectral television, and the synthetic aperture radar at satellite altitudes and the incorporation of the relevant earth science models into the integrated system must be undertaken The estimated total system costs, including R&D, investment, and 20 years' annual operating costs total $1 34 billion The United States' benefits from the three cases were estimated at 10 5 billion for the 1970­ 90 period, and world benefits were estimated at $50 billion The bene­ fits accrue to power users, residents of flood plains, farmers, other in­ dividuals, and the general public The four-satellite system proposed in the report could be deployed solely for wheat production management alone, but the benefits could be v realized with fewer satellites and no radar The satellite system makes it possible to monitor world wheat production to permit optimal United States adjustments The wheat rust case requires more frequent monitoring (every 12 hours) and the use of radar Aircraft overflights offer a lower cost alter­ native than a satellite system used solely for wheat rust control The water management case requires 6-hour coverage and the full use of the satellite system The cost-benefit ratios are substantial, and the satellite is superior to aircraft and other alternatives if a major por­ tion of the United States' river basins are covered Viewed in another perspective, however, the multipurpose satellite system requiring 6-hour observations, the multispectral scanner, TV, and radar can be supported by the water management case alone That system could then generate, as by-products, the benefits from the wheat management and wheat rust cases v3 -TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 I WATER MANAGEMENT CASE 7 A Information User Survey 8 B User-Sensor Model 16 1 Principal Observations Required 17 2 Selected Sensors 18 C Hydrological Models 32 1 Subbasin Forecasting Model 32 2 River User Decision Mode] 73 D System Operation and Benefits 82 1 Hydroelectric Power Benefits 82 2 Irrigation - 99 3 Flood Control 107 4 Navigation 114 5 Recreation . 115 E Satellite Constellation Analysis 1z0 1 Definition of Geographical Areas 120 2 Requirements Analysis 120 F Information System Configuration 1Z8 G System Costs 138 1 Satellite Program 1970-1990 System 138 2 Spacecraft System Satellite Program R&D 138 3 Launch Vehicle 141 4 Interpretation and Analysis Center 141 5 Communications 141 6 Sensitivity Analysis 143 H Summary of Water Management Costs and Benefits in the Pacific Northwest, 1970-1989 149 I Extrapolation of Water Management Benefits From the Pacific Northwest to the United States 154 1 The Extrapolation Model 154 2 Results of the Model 158 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Page J Information Alternatives 160 K Noninformation Alternatives 164 III AGRICULTURE CASES 169 A Information User Survey ....... 169 B User-Sensor Model .. 176 C Wheat Inventory/Yield Management 180 1 Wheat Inventory/Yield User Decision Model . 180 2 Benefits 2.....05 3 Total Costs o 220 4 Sensitivity 220 5 Noninformation Alternatives 222 D Wheat Rust Control . 226 1 User Decision Model . .. 226 2 Total Benefits . 244 3 Total Costs . 250 4 Sensitivity 250 5 Information Alternatives 253 6 Noninformation Alternatives . 255 IV TECHNOLOGICAL PHASING 259 V CONCLUSIONS .... 269 BIBLIOGRAPHY 275 viii LIST OF EXHIBITS Page I-I Abbreviated Methodological Flow Diagram. 3 11-1 Columbia River Basin Hydro Information-Decision System 9 U1-2 Summary of Major Findings of Information User Survey 12 11-3 Potential Sensings From Satellite 20 11-4 Major Hydrologic Parameters and Sensor Capabilities 21 II-5 Regional Water Management
Recommended publications
  • Dry Falls Visitor Center Due to the Fact That Many Travelers Saw These Unusual Landforms in the Landscape As They Drove the Coulee Corridor

    Dry Falls Visitor Center Due to the Fact That Many Travelers Saw These Unusual Landforms in the Landscape As They Drove the Coulee Corridor

    Interactive Design Approach IMMERSIVE Theater Topo Model The design approach for the exhibits is closely integrated with the Seating architecture. The layering of massive, linear building walls pro- for 50-60 EXHIBIT vides a direction for the design and layout of exhibit components. Gallery Real ‘Today’ erratic OUTDOOR Terrace Building walls are cut open at strategic points to accommodate WITH EXhibits specific exhibits and to allow for circulation. Smaller, wall-panel exhibits are used for supports and dividers. Equipment ‘Volcanic ‘Ice Age Floods’ Room Period’ Approaching the center, visitors are forced to walk around a mas- sive erratic – these huge boulders are seemingly deposited directly Gallery Animal Modelled erratic Lava flow overhead Freestanding time line animal cutouts on the path to the front door. The displaced rock serves as a strong Welcome in floor icon of the violent events that occurred during the Ice Age Floods. Through the Visitor Center’s front doors, visitors are startled to see another massive erratic precariously wedged overhead between W M Retail / cafe the two parallel building walls. Just out of reach it makes an un- usual photo opportunity for visitors who puzzle over how the rock terrace stays in place. From an interpretive standpoint, it is important to Outdoor Classroom realize no actual erratics are present in the Sun Lakes-Dry Falls with Amphitheater State Park landscape. During the floods, water was moving too quickly for erratics to be deposited at Dry Falls - they were car- ried downstream and deposited in the Quincy and Pasco basins many miles away. However, the results of the visioning workshop determined that erratics are an important and exciting flood fea- ture to display at the Dry Falls Visitor Center due to the fact that many travelers saw these unusual landforms in the landscape as they drove the Coulee Corridor.
  • Millersylvania State Park

    Millersylvania State Park

    STEAMBOAT ROCK STATE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN November 2010 Washington State Parks’ Mission: The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acquires, operates, enhances, and protects a diverse system of recreational, cultural, and natural sites. The Commission fosters outdoor recreation and education statewide to provide enjoyment and enrichment for all and a valued legacy to future generations. Steamboat Rock State Park Management Plan Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND CONTACTS The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission gratefully acknowledges the many stakeholders and the staff of Steamboat Rock State Park who participated in public meetings, reviewed voluminous materials, and made this a better plan because of it. Plan Author Andrew Fielding, Environmental Planner, Eastern Region Steamboat Rock State Park Area Management Planning Team Tom Poplawski, Steamboat Rock State Park Manager Jim Harris, Eastern Region Director Tom Ernsberger, Eastern Region Operations Manager Brian Hovis, Administrator, Policy and Governmental Affairs, Olympia Headquarters Bill Fraser, Parks Planner, Eastern Region Andrew Fielding, Environmental Planner, Eastern Region Washington State Park and Recreation Commission 1111 Israel Road SW, Olympia, WA 98504 Tel: (360) 902-8500 Fax: (360) 753-1591 TDD: (360) 664-3133 Commissioners (at time of land classification adoption): Fred Olson, Chair Joe Taller, Vice Chair Rodger Schmitt, Secretary Eliot Scull Lucinda S. Whaley Patricia T. Lantz Cecilia Vogt Rex Derr, Director Steamboat Rock State Park Management Plan
  • Top 35 Fishing Waters of Grant County

    Top 35 Fishing Waters of Grant County

    TOP35 FISHING WATERS In Grant County, Washington For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 TourGrantCounty.com CONTENTS Grant County Tourism Commission The Top 35 Fishing Waters In Grant County, Washington PO Box 37 1. Potholes Reservoir (28,000 acres) .................................................1 Ephrata, Washington 98837 2. Banks Lake (24,900 acres) .......................................................2 TOP 3. Moses Lake (6,800 acres) .......................................................3 No part of this book may be reproduced in any 4. Blue Lake (534 acres) ...........................................................4 3 form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other 5. Park Lake (338 acres) ...........................................................5 5 means, without permission in writing from the 6. Burke Lake (69 acres) ...........................................................6 Grant County Tourism Commission. 7. Martha Lake (15 acres) ..........................................................7 FISHING 8. Corral Lake (70 acres) ...........................................................8 © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Fifth printing, 10m 9. Priest Lake Pool (below Wanapum Dam) ...........................................8 WATERS 10. Hanford Reach (below Priest Rapids Dam) .........................................10 11. Rocky Ford Creek .............................................................11 In Grant County, Washington
  • John W. Keys III Pump-Generating Plant

    John W. Keys III Pump-Generating Plant

    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation John W. Keys III Pump-Generating Plant The John W. Keys III Pump-Generating Plant pumps for irrigation and also provides important recreational water uphill 280 feet from Franklin D. Roosevelt Lake benefits to the region. to Banks Lake. This water is used to irrigate approxi- The pump-generating plant began operation in 1951. mately 670,000 acres of farmland in the Columbia Basin From 1951 to 1953, six pumping units, each rated at Project. More than 60 crops are grown in the basin and 65,000 horsepower and with a capacity to pump 1,600 distributed across the nation. cubic feet per second, were installed in the plant. Congress authorized Grand Coulee Dam in 1935, with In the early 1960s, investigations revealed the potential its primary purpose to provide water for irrigation. for power generation. Reversible pumps were installed to When the United States entered World War II in 1941, allow water from Banks Lake to flow back through the the focus of the dam shifted from irrigation to power units to generate power during periods of peak demand. production. It was not until 1943 that Congress autho- The first three generating pumps came online in 1973. rized the Columbia Basin Project to deliver water to the Two more generating pumps were installed in 1983; the farmers of central Washington State. final generating pump was installed in January 1984. Construction of the irrigation facilities began in 1948. The total generating capacity of the plant is now Components of the project include the pump-generating 314,000 kilowatts.
  • Wvter Action

    WVTER TO ACTION GRAND COULEE DAM AND LAKE ROOSEVELT U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION- BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION -U.S. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ake Roosevelt has steadily gained in popularity as a summer tourist attraction. t High reservoir levels most years provide visitors with a rich variety of recreational opportunities. But many people are not aware of the full story behind Grand Coulee Dam and the great lake it created. This brochure explains the origin of Lake Roosevelt, why it was built and how it serves the people of the Pacific Northwest. It represents a unified effort on the part of the three federal agencies most involved in management and oversight of Lake Roosevelt and Grand Coulee Dam: the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, the Bonneville Power Administration, and the U.S. National Park Service. Who's responsible for what? The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation built and operates the Columbia Basin Project including Grand Coulee Dam. While many parties with diverse needs and interests provide input in the pro­ ject's operation, Reclamation makes the final decisions. To contact a repre­ sentative of Reclamation, call (509) 638-1360 or write to Grand Coulee Project Office, Attention: Code 140, Grand Coulee, Washington 99133. The Bonneville Power Administration markets and distributes power gener­ ated at federal dams on the Columbia River and its tributaries. In 1980, a new federal law charged BPA with ensuring that the Northwest has an adequate sup­ ply of power, whether from hydroelectric dams or other generating resources. BPA schedules power generation at Grand Coulee Dam within constraints established by Reclamation that provide for the project's multipurpose benefits.
  • Banks Lake Drawdown Environmental Impact Statement

    Banks Lake Drawdown Environmental Impact Statement

    Banks Lake Drawdown Final Environmental Impact Statement U.S. Department of the Interior Upper Columbia Area Office Bureau of Reclamation Ephrata Field Office Pacific Northwest Region Ephrata, Washington Boise, Idaho May 2004 MISSION STATEMENTS The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Final Environmental Impact Statement Banks Lake Drawdown Douglas and Grant Counties, Washington Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation For further information contact: Jim Blanchard Special Projects Officer Ephrata Field Office Bureau of Reclamation Box 815 Ephrata, WA 98823 (509) 754-0226 The Action Alternative describes the resource conditions that would occur with Banks Lake water surface elevations between 1570 feet and 1560 feet, while the No Action Alternative describes the conditions that would occur without the action, with water surface elevation between 1570 feet and 1565 feet. Both the No Action and Action Alternatives include four potential operational scenarios that could occur annually within their respective ranges, depending upon the hydrology of any given year. Both alternatives include refilling the reservoir to elevation 1570 feet by September 22. The No Action Alternative is the preferred alternative. The draft environmental impact statement provided Reclamation’s determination that the Action Alternative “may affect but is not likely to adversely affect” the federally listed bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and would have no effect on the federally listed pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) or Ute ladies’-tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis).
  • Carlson-Duncan-Johnson Grand Coulee 2004

    Carlson-Duncan-Johnson Grand Coulee 2004

    PNNL-14998 Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 TJ Carlson JP Duncan RL Johnson FINAL REPORT March 31, 2005 Prepared for the Bonneville Power Administration under a Related Services Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S.
  • Mars Pathfinder Landing Site Workshop Ii: Characteristics of the Ares Vallis Region and Field Trips in the Channeled Scabland, Washington

    Mars Pathfinder Landing Site Workshop Ii: Characteristics of the Ares Vallis Region and Field Trips in the Channeled Scabland, Washington

    /, NASA-CR-200508 L / MARS PATHFINDER LANDING SITE WORKSHOP II: CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ARES VALLIS REGION AND FIELD TRIPS IN THE CHANNELED SCABLAND, WASHINGTON LPI Technical Report Number 95-01, Part 1 Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI/TR--95-01, Part 1 "lp MARS PATHFINDER LANDING SITE WORKSHOP II: CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ARES VALLIS REGION AND FIELD TRIPS IN THE CHANNELED SCABLAND, WASHINGTON Edited by M. P. Golombek, K. S. Edgett, and J. W. Rice Jr. Held at Spokane, Washington September 24-30, 1995 Sponsored by Arizona State University Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Technical Report Number 95-01, Part 1 LPI/TR--95-01, Part 1 Compiled in 1995 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the University Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may he copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. This report may he cited as Golomhek M. P., Edger K. S., and Rice J. W. Jr., eds. ( 1992)Mars Pathfinder Landing Site Workshop 11: Characteristics of the Ares Vallis Region and Field Trips to the Channeled Scabland, Washington. LPI Tech. Rpt. 95-01, Part 1, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. 63 pp.
  • Coumbia Basin JUN 29 2016 Banks Lake App.Pdf

    Coumbia Basin JUN 29 2016 Banks Lake App.Pdf

    Generation from Irrigation 457 1st Avenue NW Bus: (509) 754-2227 P.O. Box 219 Fax: (509) 754-2425 Ephrata, WA 98823 June 29, 2016 ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N. E. Washington, D. C. 20426 Re: Banks Lake Pumped Storage Project FERC No. 14329-000, Application for Extension of the Preliminary Permit and Sixth Six-month Progress Report Dear Secretary Bose: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued the preliminary permit for Columbia Basin Hydropower’s1 (CBHP) Banks Lake Pumped Storage Project, FERC No. 14329 (Project) on August 22, 2013 with an effective date of August 01, 2016. The current preliminary permit expires on July 31, 2016. CBHP requests a two-year extension of the preliminary Permit to July 31, 2018. Supporting information is provided below, as well as within the attached Preliminary Permit Amendment Application as required under 18CFR §4.82. This Application for Extension of the Preliminary Permit serves also as the Sixth Six-month progress report. Background Six-month progress reports for this proposed hydroelectric project were submitted on January 9, 2014; July 18, 2014; January 22, 2015; July 8, 2015 and January 15, 2016. Each of these progress reports, along with this filing, details CBHP’s studies and consultations necessary to determine the feasibility of the project and to support an application for a license. Preferred Alternative for Analysis The preliminary permit identifies two potential alternatives for development at Banks Lake. Through investigations already completed and as reported in the Fourth and Fifth progress reports, July 8, 2015 and January 15, 2016 respectively, CBHP determined that Alternative 2 was not practical for a pumped storage project.
  • Banks Lake Pumped Storage Project (North Dam Site) FERC Project No

    Banks Lake Pumped Storage Project (North Dam Site) FERC Project No

    Phil Rockefeller W. Bill Booth Chair Vice Chair Washington Idaho Tom Karier James Yost Washington Idaho Henry Lorenzen Pat Smith Oregon Montana Bill Bradbury Jennifer Anders Oregon Montana September 9, 2015 MEMORANDUM TO: Council Members FROM: Elizabeth Osborne and Gillian Charles SUBJECT: Proposed Pump Storage Project at Banks Lake BACKGROUND: Presenter: Tim Culbertson, Manager, Columbia Basin Hydropower Summary: Tim Culbertson will brief the Council on a potential pumped storage project at Banks Lake and Lake Roosevelt being studied by Columbia Basin Hydropower and other partners. He will discuss the purpose of the project, preliminary costs, current status and expected timeline. Columbia Basin Hydropower, formally the Grand Coulee Project Hydroelectric Authority, is the result of an agreement between the East Columbia Basin Irrigation District, Quincy Columbia Basin Irrigation District, and South Columbia Basin Irrigation District, to develop, operate, and maintain hydroelectric generating facilities on the irrigation systems of the Columbia Basin Project. To date, Columbia Basin Hydropower operates and maintains five power developments and provides Federal Energy Regulatory Commission liaison support for two power developments. In April 2015, Columbia Basin Hydropower concluded a pre-feasibility study for a pumped storage project at Banks Lake, near Grand Coulee Dam, which would provide up to 1,000 MW generating capacity. The study included a preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the project. 851 S.W. Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100 Steve Crow 503-222-5161 Portland, Oregon 97204-1348 Executive Director 800-452-5161 www.nwcouncil.org Fax: 503-820-2370 Overall, the project could provide greater value than other similarly-sized pumped storage projects because of its large reservoir sizes and because the project would not require construction of new dams or reservoirs, but could also have higher installation costs.
  • Lake Roosevelt and the Case of the Channeled Scablands

    Lake Roosevelt and the Case of the Channeled Scablands

    Lake Roosevelt and the Case of the Channeled Scablands Lake Roosevelt National Park Service National Recreation Area U.S. Department of the Interior As you drive toward your summer camping destination at Lake Roosevelt, you spot a giant house-sized, granite rock sitting in the middle of a wheat field. You wonder, “How did that get there?” Later you notice the landscape is dotted with patches of barren black rock and in some areas long deep channels, called coulees, slice through that basalt rock. You find it odd. “What caused that?” How’d that get there? You have just stumbled upon the Case of the Channeled Scab- lands. The deep coulees, barren scablands, the dry falls and the other unusual formations are all a part of the geologic mystery of Lake Roosevelt: a mystery that has puzzled geologists for ages. In the early 20th century, geologists pieced together clues from the rocks in Eastern Washington and came up with two possible explana- Puzzle Piece: Glacial erratic. tions for the curious geologic formations in the area. One group of geo- (Image: National Park Service) sleuths believed that glaciers had created the curiosities, while the other group thought a giant river had carved the landscape. Both groups believed that the scabland case had been wrapped up. Like all good detectives, the geo-sleuths based their investigation on some Words to Know established principles: Igneous rock - Geologic Principle One: Uniformitarianism. Geologic solidified molten change is gradual. It takes millions of years to change the material. Volcanic rocks landscape except when volocanos, earthquakes or floods are involved.
  • Appendix E Shoreline Characterization, City of Grand Coulee

    Appendix E Shoreline Characterization, City of Grand Coulee

    APPENDIX E SHORELINE CHARACTERIZATION, CITY OF GRAND COULEE Appendix E The City of Grand Coulee Shoreline Master Program Update Shoreline Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization Report 1 SHORELINE INVENTORY Appendix E contains the Inventory, Analysis, and Characterization results for the City of Grand Coulee (City). Section 1 describes the land use patterns of the City, specifically detailing: Existing land use Planned land use based on the City’s Comprehensive Plan Preferred use for shoreline areas based on the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) Existing shoreline environment designations based on the City’s current Shoreline Master Program (SMP), if one exists Section 2 summarizes the land-capacity analysis results. Section 3 summarizes the characterization of each shoreline reach within Grand Coulee. The following reaches are included: Banks Lake Crescent Bay Lake Roosevelt 1.1 Land Use Patterns 1.1.1 Existing Land Use The City and the Urban Growth Area (UGA) have about 81 acres of shoreline along Banks Lake, Crescent Bay, and Lake Roosevelt. Most of the shoreline is open space and owned by federal, state, or local governments. Public ownership includes the following: National Parks Service (NPS) U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) Existing uses include roads, single-family residences, and trail and recreational activities in open spaces. Final Draft Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report June 2013 Grant County Shoreline Master Program Update 1 110827-01.01 Appendix E 1.1.2 Planned Land Use The City's Comprehensive Plan (plan) provides a 20-year growth plan for the City. It guides the growth and development of the community. The Land Use Element of the plan is intended to provide land for planned growth of the community.