SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL
9 Report for Central Community Assembly
REPORT OF Central Community Assembly Performance & Planning officer; and Transport & Highways link manager
DATE 9th June 2011 Highways schemes in the Central Community Assembly Area – SUBJECT priorities for 2011/12 Andy Shallice Ian Wheeldon AUTHOR OF REPORT: [email protected] [email protected] Telephone: 0114 205 3049 Telephone: 0114 273 6368 To seek members recommendation on the allocation of funds for SUMMARY 2011/12. That this Community Assembly meeting, RECOMMENDATIONS: a) Approves the schemes for feasibility design from the devolved Highways budget for 2011/12 in paragraph (4.6), Central Walkley traffic assessment; Harcourt Rd/Crookes Valley Rd junction re-modelling; and Taptonville, Winn Gardens, Hanover/Exeter Drive and Harcourt 20mph works and approves the construction of the Wisewood 20 mph zone subject to the final scheme costs not exceeding the £30,000 allocation. b) Approves an allocation of up to £40,000 for the smaller Highway Scheme budget, paragraphs (5.2.1 – 5.2.5); and either approve (5.12) or (5.13) c) Notes the progress on the schemes approved for construction in 2010/11, paragraphs (3.1 – 3.5)
BACKGROUND PAPERS
CATEGORY OF OPEN REPORT: OPEN/CLOSED
Financial Implications
YES Cleared by:
1 Legal Implications
YES Cleared by: Julian Ward
Equality of Opportunity Implications YES
Tackling Health Inequalities Implications
NO
Human rights Implications
NO
Environmental and Sustainability implications
YES
Economic impact
NO
Community safety implications
NO
Human resources implications
YES
Property implications
NO
Area(s) affected
Central Assembly – Central, Broomhill, Walkley, Hillsborough wards
Relevant Cabinet Portfolio Leader
Relevant Scrutiny Committee if decision called in
Economic and Environmental Wellbeing
Is the item a matter which is reserved for approval by the City Council? NO
Press release
NO
1.0 Outcomes and Sustainability
2 1.1 The Cabinet meeting shortly will approve the 2011/12 Local Transport Plan (LTP) capital programme which included an allocation for highway works within each Assembly area. The indication is that this year the allocation will be £131,000.
1.2 Central Community Assembly will have devolved responsibility for spending their allocation in 2011/12.
1.3 This devolved budget to the Community Assemblies contributes to the Council’s principles as indicated in the Corporate Plan. In particular - Residents and communities having voice and control over services and budgets Protecting and enhancing the environment Streets to be proud of Public transport that is easier to use Safer roads
2.0 Report Summary
2.1 To seek members recommendation on the prioritisation of schemes for more detailed feasibility (and costings) leading to possible construction in 2011/12 for larger1 projects. And to agree that for 2011/12 an allocation of £40,000 is set aside for smaller scheme works.
2.2 Note the completion of a variety of highway schemes constructed in 2010/11.
3.0 2010/11 Scheme progress
3.1 Lowfield School controlled crossing is now complete. The new zebra and London Road triangle pedestrian improvements are now completed.
3.2 Heavygate Road scheme is now complete.
3.3 Work to the signals at Crookesmoor Road and Barber Road is now complete.
3.4 The new zebra on Whitehouse Lane had received objections to the associated Traffic Regulation Order (TRO). These objections have now been considered by Cabinet Highways and over-ruled; the works are now programmed to be on site now.
3.5 Minor works completed include:
Broomhill Purchase and installation of two Speed Indication Devices (‘smiley SID’) Clarkehouse Rd and Westbourne Rd - new Zebrite beacons Dropped kerbs Durham Rd, Clarkson St, Glossop Rd Tapton Crescent Rd
Central
1 Larger schemes include footways and crossings; school entrances and danger reduction schemes, and any other scheme costed at more than £10,000 3 Dropped kerbs Alderson Rd Woodhead Rd Club Garden Rd Mount St St Wilfrid’s Rd Pinstone St Sheaf St (by railway station) Washington Rd Contribution to Convent Walk closure
Hillsborough Handrails – Wadsley Lane, Walders Ave, Wisewood Lane Dropped kerbs Bickerton Rd Bradfield Rd Eskdale Close Vainor Rd Penistone Rd North Worrall Rd
Walkley Handrails – Wellbeck Rd Bollards – South Rd Dropped kerbs South Rd, and junctions off
4.0 Summary of larger Highways schemes approved to date within Central Community Assembly; and for preliminary design and possible construction 2011/12
4.1 The last Central CA business meeting (24th March 2011) agreed that the following larger schemes should be carried out in 2011/12: (a) a contribution to the major highway improvement proposal for Wisewood (£30,000) (b) public realm enhancements associated with a larger LTP scheme to provide controlled pedestrian crossing points at Fulwood Road/Crookes Road (£30,000) (c) provision of a 20mph speed limit zone on Winn Gardens and 20mph limit works to Hanover Estate (£10,000 - £12,000) (d) 20mph limit works in the Taptonville Road area and Harcourt Road/Harcourt Crescent (£20,000 - £28,000) (e) a contribution to enhancement works to public realm at Fulwood Road associated with the LTP funded scheme at Crookes Road signals (£30,000) (f) traffic management review for Central Walkley (£30,000 - £40,000) (g) improvement works to help pedestrians at the junction of Harcourt Road with Crookes Valley Road (£50,000 - £60,000) (h) an allocation of £40,000 for minor highways schemes (costing less than £10,000)
4 4.2 It is now clear that the level of funding allocated to the Assembly for the present financial year, will not be sufficient to allow all the above schemes to proceed. To try and bring the programme back in line with the finance available, it is suggested that the following changes to the works programme are agreed.
4.3 With the significant funding reduction to the LTP programme that has occurred, the major corridor scheme for Manchester Road which included controlled pedestrian crossing facilities to Fulwood Road/Crookes Road has been removed from the programme, and is not now likely to receive funding for a number of years. It is therefore suggested that the monies set aside for associated enhancements are used elsewhere. An assessment has been made as to whether the public realm works could be progressed independent of the pedestrian crossing improvements. This might be possible but the costs would be very high, as joint costs for the two elements of the scheme would not have to be borne solely by the public realm works.
4.4 It is suggested that for the central Walkley traffic management assessment scheme, this year’s work be confined to the review and consultation exercise, and so start to undertake specific works in the following financial year. This should reduce this budget item to below £20,000.
4.5 Officers expect the costs of the Harcourt Rd/Crookes Valley Rd junction re- modelling to be less than the present estimate.
4.6 Based on the above suggested changes, together with anticipated savings to the Harcourt Road junction, once the detailed design has been completed and fully costed, it may be possible to ensure that the remaining programme is completed within the present financial year, subject to confirmation of the funding levels available. It is proposed that the following schemes are now progressed to feasibility design and a Street Force detailed cost estimate. The Assembly will then be able to balance the detailed estimates against its allocated budget, to prioritise the schemes for construction in 2011/12.
Scheme Present estimate Wisewood estate 20 mph £30,000 Central Walkley traffic assessment “Less than £20,000” Harcourt Rd/Crookes Valley Rd “Less than £50,000” Taptonville, Winn, Hanover, Harcourt 20 mph £20,000 - £28,000
5. Small Highways schemes for construction 2011/12
5.1 The information in this report is produced from the list of requests submitted by members of the public, and occasionally community groups and businesses, which outline their view of a particular problem on the highway, and their suggestion(s) as to what the solution could be. The latest (April 2011) ‘register of requests’ for small schemes is attached with this report. Outstanding small highways requests are estimated at over £114,000.
5.2 The assembly have previously agreed that £40,000 should be allocated for the construction of these small schemes. As with the larger Highways schemes, the
5 Assembly has previously made decisions on some of these requests, totalling £25,008.
5.2.1 Tactile paved crossings at Crookesmoor Road/Barber Road junction (£6,000).
5.2.2 Two Speed Indication Devices (‘Smiley SIDs’) for display around the Assembly area. They are currently displayed at Abbeydale Rd. These sites will include:
Howard Rd, Walkley Loxley Rd, Malin Bridge Walkley Bank Rd, Walkley Oxford St, Crookesmoor Neepsend Lane (Percy St/Ball St) Brocco Bank Crookes Rd Cemetery Rd
SIDs can be displayed together or singly. Members are invited to suggest further sites for SID locations. It is proposed to allocate £10,768 to upgrade the SIDs for solar power and installation and maintenance at eight sites in the Assembly area.
5.2.3 The Assembly have already agreed a request (with the consent of the Chair) to install four dropped kerbs on Loxley Rd as recent repairs by Street Force to the pavement had made Loxley Rd inaccessible to a resident who uses a wheelchair. It was confirmed that this was a priority, as she’d become a prisoner! The cost has been £1,240.
5.2.4 An additional traffic signal on Langsett Rd/junction with Forbes Rd has been previously agreed. The cost for this is estimated at £3,000.
5.2.5 The Assembly had previously agreed to carry out re-modelling works at the junction of Ecclesall Rd/Renton St (the old Wards’ brewery site). This work has not been designed in time to be carried out in 2010/11 and so has slipped into the highways schemes for 2011/12 (£4,000).
5.3 Cycling schemes
No cycling schemes were supported in 2010/11. Due to the number of requests received from cyclists, or about cycling safety, we have requested road safety to provide a map of all accidents involving cyclists in the Central Assembly area. This should help to guide a prioritisation of requests – like the recent proposals along the Walkley Active Travel Corridor, and could form the basis of a dialogue with local cycling groups.
5.4 Verge protection – Dykes Lane
No verge protection schemes were supported in 2010/11. The suggestion that Dykes Lane verge protection be included in the Pennine Wisewood programme was rejected as the investment was targeted purely on the streets of the estate that gave rise to the VAT shelter funding; there is insufficient funding to do all that is needed on Wisewood and any further diminution would be problematic.
6 Bearing in mind the investment that the Assembly has made in developing the 20 mph zone in Wisewood alongside the Pennine Streetscene programme, the Assembly could consider asking colleagues from Transport & Highways to work alongside staff from the Assembly team and residents on Dykes Lane to explore the variety of local issues – protection of the grass verges, need for off road parking, existing road width, traffic flows and speeds – and to report back to the Assembly in spring 2012 with a view to a local scheme for construction via LTP funding in 2012/13.
5.5 Hanover estate/Ecclesall Rd entrance
The Ecclesall Rd entrance to Hanover estate is owned by a private individual who has recently fenced off (some of) the entrance to the estate. It is suggested that any scheme by delayed until the current matters are resolved.
5.6 Traffic Regulation orders
Of the 12 Traffic Regulation Orders received within the Assembly area, two might be particularly relevant for members as they have been requested by local businesses. A large part of the estimated £3,000 cost of any TRO is the advert; this can be reduced if proposed TROs are advertised in batches. Lancaster St (A&CT) Burton St (Barkers)
5.7 Box junctions – Inner Ring Road, Alma St, Corporation St, Russell St
It is important to make sure that the problem raised isn't a fault with the operation of the traffic signals, or even a misunderstanding of the new Puffin style crossings. With regard to yellow boxes, Urban Traffic Control (UTC) has made recent adjustments to the signal timings at peak times at the junctions around Bridgehouses and Corporation Street, to reduce some of the congestion in the area, or at least better manage the queues. The Assembly should be advised of these recent changes and therefore might want to review their request in response to these changes, especially in the clockwise direction of the Inner Ring Road. UTC are hoping to do further timing reviews in the near future, subject to resources.
5.8 Napier St/Summerfield St
There have been 14 accidents at the Napier Street/Summerfield Street. It might be beneficial to investigate the provision of a small scheme including some minor resurfacing to enable new give way line markings to be provided at the junction and possible more visible Give Way Signage.
5.9 Blake Street
The removal of the guardrails on Blake Street has been referred to the “Sign Off” initiative. However, the first report of items on the Sign-Off were submitted on 8th March. The list did not have Blake Street on it. But even if it had got it on the list, it was unlikely to have been actioned for two reasons. First, it is not pedestrian guardrail it is a handrail; handrails were not covered by the Cabinet report. Secondly, there is an outstanding Assembly 'small' scheme request that wants the existing handrail taking down and replacing at the back of footway. It would be
7 difficult to consider the handrail redundant. Indeed, in this instance, it is suggested that the rail is helpful/essential to pedestrians. The cost of replacing the handrail to the rear of the footway would place this proposal into the large scheme budget, it is therefore suggested that this proposal is placed on the large scheme list for consideration in future years.
5.10 Upperthorpe precinct
2011/12 funds for parking permit zones are about half the initial figure for 2010/11, so currently no funds are allocated for Upperthorpe. An officer in the Transport & Highways team is about to pick up the baton for project management of schemes in Hillsborough, as well as the Hillsborough and Upperthorpe PP schemes. There is a current request to explore the scope for an "Invest to Save" bid for the two PP schemes but with no guarantees. This would not cover any further LTP work at the precinct. Such work could only be supported as a request for Assembly funds.
5.11 Members are advised either to:
5.12 allocate the remaining £15,000 funds for supporting small schemes to support Dykes Lane consultation Napier St/Summerfield St junction works Upperthorpe precinct improvements
5.13 Or, to delegate to the Chair of the Assembly and the Community Assembly manager, in consultation with the three local ward councillors, the allocation of: £4,000 in each ward to support agreed small highways schemes
6. Mitigation of Risk
The risks relating to the allocation and implementation of the devolved Highways budget have been considered by the Central Community Assembly Team on advice from Transport & Highways service. These risks will be regularly reviewed and monitored by the relevant officers and reported to the Community Assembly. The main risk is that there will be insufficient funds to support the construction of all the prioritised schemes in 2011/12. It is therefore proposed that further reports be considered at future Central CA meetings in 2011 to approve which schemes – with more precise estimates – will be constructed in 2011/12, taken into account existing approvals and agreements.
7. Financial Implications
The proposals for the spend will utilise the devolved Highways budget for 2011/12.
8. Legal Implications
The Council, as the highways authority for Sheffield, has the powers under Part V of the Highways Act 1980 to implement the improvements requested in this report.
This funding is allocated from the Local Transport Plan budget and as such all projects using this funding will need to comply with the aims and objectives of the Local Transport Plan.
8
9. Human Resources
There are no additional human resource implications.
10. Environment and Sustainability Implications
All schemes funded through the Local Transport Plan are designed to improve access for pedestrians.
11. Economic Impact
Schemes which emphasise access to, and use of, local facilities and services have been prioritised.
12. Community Safety Implications
There are no specific Community Safety implications of this report.
13. Equality of Opportunity Implications
Highway schemes that address access for some disabled people have been prioritised as part of this package.
14. Recommendations
That this Central Community Assembly meeting
a) Approves the schemes for feasibility design from the devolved Highways budget for 2011/12 in paragraph (4.6), Central Walkley traffic assessment; Harcourt Rd/Crookes Valley Rd junction re-modelling; and Taptonville, Winn Gardens, Hanover/Exeter Drive and Harcourt 20mph works and approves the construction of the Wisewood 20mph zone subject to the final scheme costs not exceeding the £30,000 allocation. b) Approves an allocation of up to £40,000 for the smaller Highway Scheme budget, paragraphs (5.2.1 – 5.2.5); and either approve (5.12) or (5.13) c) Notes the progress on the schemes approved for construction in 2010/11, paragraphs (3.1 – 3.5)
9 REQUESTS 2011 / 2012 Date sent for Feasibility SCHEME TITLE REQUEST FOR £ Check Date Back Broomhill
Birkendale Road, approaching narrow section No Through Road sign (sign £160, pole £110, stats check £30, fees £300, total = £600) 600.00 25.02.11 25.02.11 Bruce Road, proposed one-way, see under Eastwood Road to be one-way northbound, Eastwood Road to Neill Road Chesterwood Drive, even numbered side Double Yellow lines on even no. side to improve access and prevent parking on footway (TRO = £3500, lines 3,600.00 26.11.10 26.11.10 = £100) Commonside, parking lay-bys either side of Pelican crossing (especially Introduce limited waiting (TRO £3500, Signs and Lines £300), revoke urban clearways, agree measures with outside Commonside News) SW CA as east side of road is in Central CA and west side is in SW CA, Crookes Ward
Crookes Valley Road, from Harcourt Road, on approach to junction with Crookesmoor Road Provision of Cycle Lane and Advanced Stop Line (ASL) Crookes Valley Road, either side of Zebra Crossing near Harcourt Road 2 'Pedestrian Crossing' signs to alert drivers to presence of crossing (2 Signs = £600, Fees = £300) 900.00 28.01.11 28.01.11 (there is a request under Large schemes for this Zebra crossing to be upgraded to a Puffin) Eastwood Road, Bruce Road, Neill Road, one-way system Eastwood Road to be one-way eastbound between Hickmott Road and Bruce Road Neill Road to be one- way eastbound between Hickmott Road and Bruce Road. Bruce Road to be one-way northbound between Eastwood Road and Neill Road. Intended to resolve vehicle conflicts on narrow roads
Glebe Road, outside no. 46 Extend existing single yellow line by 0.4m towards no. 44 to resolve visibility and access problems caused by 3,600.00 parked cars (TRO £3500, Line £100) Glossop Road, at its junction with Fulwood Road, Broomhill Extra signage and / or a speaking sign to prevent pedestrians crossing Glossop Road when the Pelican is on red to pedestrians Neill Road, proposed one-way, see under Eastwood Road to be one-way eastbound, Hickmott Road to Bruce Road Oxford Street Traffic Calming or Smiley SID (Smiley SID = £8250) 01.04.10 Roebuck Road, either side of car park entrance at no. 2a Northfield Nursing Ho2 Lowered kerbs, no tactiles 620.00 02.12.10 02.12.10 Sydney Street, north side, across driveway for 19A Commonside vehicular 'H' marking 75.00 Sydney Street, south (The Dram Shop) side, full length Double Yellow Lines because road is narrow (TRO = £3500, Lines = £300) 3,800.00 Westbourne Road, conversion of 10 unrestricted parking spaces outside and Residents Only Permit Parking scheme (TRO = £3500, signs & lines = £1250, plus ongoing annual 4,750.00 23.02.11 23.02.11 opposite no. 63 to Permit Parking scheme administration costs)
Central
Arundel Gate to Surrey Street cycle route Cycle symbols on red tarmac / brick 09.04.10 Asher Road / South View Road junction Time Limited Waiting outside no. 99 South View Road and at side of premises on Asher Road (TRO £3500, 3,800.00 14.01.11 14.01.11 Signs and Lines £300) Asher Road / Vincent Road junction Double Yellow lines around both sides of junction to keep footways clear for pedestrians and to keep junction 3,700.00 14.01.11 14.01.11 clear (TRO £3500, Yellow Lines £200)
Bramall Lane, at island at its junction with Asline Road 2 Lowered kerbs with tactiles 946.00 Broomhall Street, footway and cycleway on west side of Hanover Way Re-design footway and cycleway so that they do not cross and re-cross each other, which causes pedestrian / cycle conflicts and / or improve lighting and remove JC Decaux advertising board to improve visibility
Broomspring Lane (west), car park on the north side of its junction with Upper Hanover Street Convert free car park into pay and display: TRO, ticket machine, signing and lining Broom Walk (footpath between Broomhall Street and Headford Street, near HeRelocate central section of chicane barrier further north to improve access for cyclists (approx. £330) or, as 29.07.10 29.07.10 existing barrier is old, remove it and install a new, slightly shorter section further north (approx. £530) both £ incl. Stats checks
Brown Street junction with Sidney Street outside Access Space some Sheffield cycle stands (£225 each + £30 stats check) 18.03.10 Cavendish Court, outside block nos. 2 - 12 1 existing Lowered kerb with tactiles - lowered kerb needs re-laying as it is not low enough for easy 310.00 24.01.11 24.01.11 wheelchair access Cemetery Road Double bend warning sign (£300), Slow sign (£300), SLOW carriageway markings (Slow marking = £350, 2,250.00 16.03.10 traffic control = £300), possible red surfacing (£900-£1000) Cemetery Road, southwest bound, approaching Washington Road junction 3 Alto Grenadier bollards (£675 + £30 Stats check = £705) along edge of footway to stop left turning traffic 705.00 11.01.11 17.02.11 from driving along footway, to pass straight ahead queuing traffic, in order to access left turn filter lane
Charter Row / Rockingham Street junction - north side Bollards / knee rail at back edge of footway to protect grassed area, Stats check 07.05.10 07.05.10 Glossop Road, near 'New Roots' shop - no. 347 1 or 2 Sheffield cycle stands (£255 or £480) 03.06.10 Grange Crescent, driveway outside no. 44 replace existing Single Yellow line with Double Yellow lines (£1150, or £1550 if objectiopns received) to 1,150.00 10.03.11 10.03.11 resolve access problems Holberry Gardens at the closure on the west side of Brunswick Street 1. Two lowered kerbs, no tactiles, one on either side of closure. 2. Provision of cycle path - red surfacing with white edging and provision of a white cycle symbol at either end of path. 3. Existing planter - this may need to be relocated but must be retained on site. 4. One or two of the existing bollards on the west side of the closure may have to be moved in order to create a large enough gap for cyclists to get through.
Lancaster Street, outside Aircraft & Commercial Tools premises Double Yellow lines to stop on-street parking blocking access (TRO £3500, Lines £250) 3,750.00 17.11.10 17.11.10
Lancaster Street, at vehicular entrance to Kelham Mills flats (at junction with Double Yellow Lines either side of entrance to stop on-street parking blocking sight lines for vehicles exiting 3,700.00 Neepsend Lane, opposite Percy Street) Kelham Mills (TRO £3500, Lines £200) London Road, east side, on the south side of the Pelican crossing located 11m Pedestrian Guardrail (£1485) and Stats check (£30) or 6 Alto bollards (£1380) on south side of Pelican 04.08.10 south of Boston Street junction (outside Greggs, Love Your Hair and Subway) to stop motorists using lowered kerbs at Pelican to drive onto footway and park London Road / Boston Street junction, Pedestrian Guardrails Re-paint the corroded Pedestrian Guardrails in this general area, in order to make the area look better
London Road, east side, south of Woodhead Road junction extending existing guardrail by 10m southwards to deter illegal parking (£1350), Stats check (£30) NB - will 1,380.00 18.10.10 07.03.11 require consultation with frontagers (shops) Love Street, outside no. 33 (Employment Service Building) 1 Lowered kerb, no tactiles, for disabled (wheelchair) access 310.00 14.01.11 19.01.11 Napier Street / Summerfield Street crossroads Resurface carriageway, new 'Give Way' markings on carriageways on both sides of Napier Street and more conspicuous 'Give Way' signs Neepsend Lane, immediately east of its junction with Lancaster Street Double Yellow Lines to stop on-street parking blocking sight lines for vehicles exiting Lancaster Street (TRO 3,700.00 £3500, Lines £200) Northbank (Wicker Riverside, access off Willey Street) Double Yellow lines to resolve access problems (£1150, or £1550 if objections received) 1,150.00 15.03.11 25.03.11 North Church Street, opposite junction with St Peter's Close Double yellow lines to keep junction clear (TRO = £3500, Lines = £50) 3,550.00 17.11.10 17.11.10 Pinstone Street, opposite the bus stops on cycle lane Cycle symbols on red tarmac / brick 200.00 09.04.10 Sharrow Lane - junctions between Smeaton Street and London Road (see emaFive 'raised tables' at junctions (SENT FOR PAID FEAS CHECK) 12.05.10 Sheaf Street opposite station, cycle route Cycle symbols on red tarmac / brick 09.04.10 Shoreham Street, between Charlotte Road and St Mary's Road Feasibility study to identify safety improvements for cyclists 400.00 17.02.11 17.02.11 The Moor, outside Sainsburys exit some Sheffield cycle stands (£225 each + £30 Stats check) Wicker Riverside, see Northbank Double Yellow lines Willey Street, see Northbank Double Yellow lines
Hillsborough
Bankfield Road, junction with Dykes Lane Double Yellow lines to prevent parked cars obscuring visibility (TRO £3500, Lines £200) / speed bumps on 08.06.10 Dykes Lane - latter would be a Large Scheme
Dykes Hall Road one way system Additional road signs - people ignoring one way sign Dykes Lane, between Wisewood Avenue and Ben Lane Measures to prevent damaged verges 07.04.10 Dykes Lane / Hibberd Place junction 9 Alto Grenadier bollards to prevent parking on footway at lowered kerbs (£225 x 9 = £2025 + 2 Stats checks 2,085.00 £60 = £2085) Findon Road outside no. 29 Alto Grenadier bollards to prevent parking on grass verge (MH- no better/ worse than others. See email 15.03.10 15.03.10)
Hibberd Place / Dykes Lane junction - see under Dykes Lane Loxley Road, at vehicle accesses at and near no. 353 3 Lowered kerbs, no tactiles 930.00 30.03.11 30.03.11 Loxley Road, directly opposite no. 374 1 Lowered kerb, no tactiles 310.00 30.03.11 30.03.11 Middlewood Road from Co-op car park, right turn Sign to warn drivers of ped crossing (Sign £160, Pole £110, Stats £30, Fees £300 ) 600.00 24.03.10 Owlings Road, opposite the driveway to no. 27 Double Yellow lines to improve access to drive (TRO £3500, Lines £100) 3,600.00 09.07.10 09.07.10 Sevenfields Lane, at its junction with Ben Lane 2 Lowered kerbs with tactiles 946.00 21.06.10 21.06.10 Well Lane, Wadsley One way / road closure / point closure (TRO £3500, signs etc £2000 - £3000) 14.02.11 14.02.11 William Sutton Estate: Balmain Drive, Balmain Rd, Ben Lane (Far Lane - Measures (e.g. bollards, parking bays, residents only parking) to resolve problem of parking on grass verges Collin Ave), Braemore Road, Collin Avenue, Dunella Drive, Dunella Place, NB - This will be a Major Scheme Dunella Road Dykes Hall Place Dykes Hall Road (Far Lane Wadsley Lane) Walkley
Blake Street, full length Remove existing handrail from front edge of footway (est. cost £3000), install approx 180m of new Handrail at 13,830.00 23.08.10 23.08.10 back edge of footway (£60 x 180 = £10,800), Stats checks (£30 - £60). Total cost = approx £13,830 Bole Hill Road, cobbled area fronting no. 2 [to be considered with Compton STarmac over existing cobbles to assist users of mobility scooters and pushchairs (15m2 x £32 = £480 - 31.01.11 31.01.11 possibly less?) Burton Street at its junctions with Langsett Road and Bliston Street Double Yellow lines (Traffic Regs to confirm with Barkers what restrictions are wanted and where, if 4,500.00 approved) Carr Road, north side of its junction with South Road Reduce gradient of footway slope down to Carr Road - may not be feasible, add tactiles (£163) Carr Road, south side of its junction with South Road 1 new Lowered kerb with tactiles (replace existing but poor) 473.00 Compton Street, on footway outside no. 10 [to be considered with Bole Hill R 11m Handrail (£660), Stats check (£30) 690.00 31.01.11 31.01.11 Compton Street, outside no. 10 [to be considered with Bole Hill Road request2 Lowered kerbs with tactiles 946.00 31.01.11 31.01.11 Crookes Valley Road outside no. 207 - Beanies 1 Sheffield cycle stand (£225 + £30 stats check = £255) 255.00 Fern Street, at its junction with Welbeck Road Double Yellow lines on inside of hairpin bend (TRO = £3500, Lines = £100) 3,600.00 10.12.10 10.12.10 Footpath, Walkley Road to Parsonage Street at its junction with Walkley Bank RResurface steep, cobbled footpath with a more slip-resistant surface (already has a handrail along its full 5,525.00 25.11.10 13.12.10 length)
Forbes Road Provision of a taxi rank (TRO £3500, Signs and Lines £200) 3,700.00 Heavygate Avenue, at verge outside no. 12 Tradesman's Path with lowered kerb from footway to 'disabled' parking bay on road (will need to line up with 1,255.00 17.11.10 17.11.10 top end of parking bay) Heavygate Avenue, outside no. 14 1 Lowered kerb, no tactiles, for wheelchair access 310.00 11.02.11 Heavygate Avenue, at steps in verge outside no. 95 H marking to prevent steps being blocked by local resident 54.00 Industry Street residents only parking scheme / measures to resolve parking problems Langsett Road, pointing up Burgoyne Road Pedestrian Finger Post sign (with post) 'Ruskin Park' 850.00 Langsett Road, at its junction with Forbes Road Install an additional traffic signal at this junction 3,000.00 02.02.11 02.02.11 Langsett Rise, cul-de-sac outside no. 15 Road realignment, Double Yellow lines, or removal of greenery Martin Street, end of road (cul-de-sac), east of "The White Rails" pub New footway provided between existing pavements with lowered kerb (no tactiles) midway along the new footway. See email 16.03.10 AS Oxford Street Traffic Calming or Smiley SID (Smiley SID = £8250) 01.04.10 Palm Street / Palm Lane junction Double Yellow lines round corners to keep junction clear (TRO £3500, Lines £200) 3,700.00 Parsonage Crescent (top) facing on to Walkley Road Warning sign: "Cycle route ahead" (Sign £160, Pole £110, Stats £30, Fees £300) 600.00 Portland Court Double Yellow Lines in turning area and 'No Parking 8.00 - 6.30, Monday to Saturday' on north east side of 3,800.00 08.02.11 08.02.11 road (opposite side to houses) to prevent obstruction by all day commuter parking (a lot of residents are disabled) (TRO £3500, Signs and Lines £300)
South Road, Walkley, pointing down Fulton Road Pedestrian Finger Post sign 'Ruskin Park' (sign £160, post £110, stats £30, fees £300) 600.00 South Road, Walkley, pointing down Hadfield Street Pedestrian Finger Post sign 'Ruskin Park' (sign £160, post £110, stats £30, fees £300) 600.00 South Road, Walkley, from 'Freedom' public house, on aproach to junction withProvision of Cycle Lane and Advanced Stop Line (ASL) South Road, Walkley outside Walkley Library 2 Sheffield cycle stands 480.00 11.06.10 Walkley Bank Road, Morley Street - Walkley Bank Close Smiley SID 8,250.00 Walkley Lane, opposite junction with Walkley Road (rear of 3 Woodview Rd) Bollards to prevent cars mounting pavement when overtaking others and a possible SLOW sign. Could be 08.04.10 large scheme - potential double kerb needed. Walkley Library - see under South Road Welbeck Road - see Fern Road Whitehouse Lane 2 Lowered kerbs with tactiles (£946) and 'H' marking (£54) or 2 Alto bollards (£480) Winter Street (into city) Provision of cyclists' right turn lane into University grounds - Large Scheme