DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Application 2/2014/0582

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Application 2/2014/0582 Planning Application 2/2014/0582 Proposed Installation of a single wind turbine with a hub height of 24.8m and tip Development: height of 34.5m. Location: Oughterside Mill Oughterside Wigton Applicant: Mr J P Lister Recommendation Re fused Summar y/Key Issues Issue Conclusion Principle of Paragraph 93 of the NPPF makes clear that the provision of Development renewable energy infrastructure is central to the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainable development. Landscape and It is considered that the proposal has the potential for significantly Visual Impact harmful cumulative impacts on the character of the landscape and the visual amenities of the locality. Residential Amenity The proposed turbine is within 800m of a number of residential properties. The proposal is likely to have an adverse impact on the amenity of the residents of these properties, and there is no evidence of support from the local community for a separation distance of less than 800m in this case. Heritage and The proposal will not have a significant adverse impact on any conservation designated heritage assets or nature conservation interests Operational Subject to conditions relating to construction operations the proposed requirements development would not have an adverse impact on the highway network. Potential benefits The proposal will make a contribution to renewable energy deployment nationally. It would also make a contribution to the running costs of the farm by creating an alternative source of income, supporting rural enterprise and economic activity. Site The turbine is proposed to be located within an existing agricultural field that is on a raised hillside. The land is associated with Oughterside Mill which aligns the river Ellen to the south west. The village of Oughterside is located approximately 570m to the north east of the site. The larger settlement of Aspatria is also located to the north east, approximately 3.5m from the site. Gilcrux, is located approximately 1km to the south. The area is predominantly rural in character comprising a mixture of small to medium scale fields bounded by hedgerows, stone walls and fences. The landscape is undulating in character and the site itself sits at approximately 64m AOD and therefore is relatively prominent. The nearest neighbouring properties are in Beech Hill which is located approximately 428m east of the turbine site. Other residential properties are located in the wider area, with a concentration at Oughterside and Prospect to the north. Relevant Policies National Planning Policy Framework Meeting the challenge of climate change, flooding and coastal change Conserving and enhancing the natural environment Conserving and enhancing the historic environment Supporting a prosperous rural economy Planning Practice Guidance for Renewable and Low Carbon Energy July 2013 Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1) Adopted July 2014 Policy S1 – Presumption in favour of sustainable development, Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1) Policy S14 – Rural economy, Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1) Policy S19 – Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Technologies Policy S27 – Heritage Assets Policy S32 – Safeguarding amenity, Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1) Policy S33 – Landscape Policy S35 – Protecting and enhancing biodiversity and geodiversity, Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1). Policy S36 – Air, water and soil quality, Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1) Policy S4 – Design principles, Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1) Policy DM17 – Trees, hedgerows and woodland, Allerdale Local Plan (Part 1). Relevant Planning History A screening opinion has been issued by the Local Planning Authority which stated that the proposal Did Not constitute EIA development. Scr/2014/0020 – Screening opinion for wind turbine 24.8m to hub height and 34.5m to tip – An EIA is NOT required. Representations Cumbria County Council – Highways. Make the following comments : - During the construction phase no vehicle shall leave the site in a condition that would give rise to the deposit of mud, dust or debris on the public highway. - The applicant shall submit a Traffic and Construction Management Plan for approval, all identified highway works shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority in consultation with the Highway Authority prior to the works commencing on site. Cumbria County Council – Landscape and Countryside. Advise that they will not be responding from a strategic planning perspective as they do not consider the proposal to be a Category 1 Application. Natural England – Make the following comments : a) Statutory nature conservation sites – No objection. b) Protected species – Natural England has published ‘Standing Advice’. c) Impact Risk Zones for SSSI ’s – Natural England has recently published a set of mapped Impact Risk Zones (IRZs) for Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Arqiva – No objection. NATS – Advise that the development is likely to impact on their electronic infrastructure. However, they have no safeguarding objection to the proposal. Ministry of Defence – No objection. Stobart Air – No objection. Electricity North West – No objection. Environmental Health – Comment that : The supporting information states that noise emissions are unlikely to present a concern in this case. However, no predictions of noise levels at the nearest properties have been provided. Therefore if permission is granted two specific Conditions regarding noise will be required to be attached to any planning approval. FORCE – Object and make the following comments : a) Height and Scale – At 34.5m to the blade tip and standing at 64m AOD, the wind turbine would be well in excess of ‘small scale’ as defined by the Governments Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). There can be no question that the proposed turbine would dominate the immediate vicinity and would be visible from a considerable distance in the surrounding countryside. b) Landscape Impact – The application site is situated within Lowland landscape category subtype 5a ‘Ridge and Valley’ according to the Cumbria Landscape Character Guidance and Toolkit (2011).This subtype is considered to have a moderate capacity for wind energy development which is defined as a small group of 3 to 5 wind turbines or, in exceptional circumstances, a larger group of 6 to 9. The reality is, however, that the area around the application site already contains a considerable amount of wind energy development and therefore we would argue that its ‘moderate’ capacity to absorb turbines without detriment to the overall character of the landscape has already been stretched to the limit. c) Energy requirements of the farm – Although it is stated in the Design and Access Statement that the electricity produced by the proposed wind turbine would offset the applicant’s energy costs, it is not actually confirmed that the turbine would supply power to the premises before any excess is sold to the National Grid. If the intention is for the turbine to meet the power requirements of the farm, then a much smaller machine is likely to be adequate and therefore the need for a 34.5m structure at this location in the open countryside cannot be demonstrated. d) Proximity to Houses/Amenity – The turbine would be situated just 442m from the non associated residential properties at Beech Hill and approximately 550m from the settlement at Oughterside. e) Noise – Some site specific measurements are necessary in this case for the protection of local residential amenity. f) Cumulative Impact – The agent has not carried out a satisfactory cumulative impact assessment. The map at paragraph 4.12 shows the wind farms at Wharrels Hill and Tallentire. Nothing further has been done to realistically examine the cumulative impact that the turbine would have in combination with others in the area. Part of the justification for the turbine is the fact that there are numerous other wind energy schemes in the area. FORCE feel that the existence of other wind turbines should not be used as a reason to add more in the same area. Also, the agent has failed to provide an accurate account of the number and location of the turbines which are already operational or which have planning permission. The application site is within very close proximity to the wind turbines at Hall Bank and Broom Hill, with 2 more further along the A596 at Bullgill where the Council is currently considering an application for an additional machine. More wind turbines have recently received planning permission at Crookdake, High Scales, Firs Farm and Leesrigg. There is an application pending at Arkleby House Farm which is also in the near vicinity. The wind farms at Tallentire, Hellrigg, Westnewton and High Pow are all either visible from the application site itself or from nearby. This is far from an exhaustive list of local wind energy developments. g) Policy – The development is contrary to policy S19 of the newly adopted Local Plan. Policy S19 contains a separation distance of 800m between wind turbines over 25m to the blade tip and residential properties. As discussed earlier, there are a number of properties which would fall well within the separation distance. It is also contrary to policies S32 and S33 which seek to protect residential amenity and also the character of Allerdale’s valued landscapes. West Newton Action Group – Object and make the following comments : a) Size – This is not a small scale turbine as defined in the DECC’s categorisation of such, and certainly is not either ‘modest size’ or ‘small scale’ as suggested by the developer. As such it would present a dominating presence to the residents of Oughterside and surrounding area. It is approximately equidistant between Oughterside Mill itself and Oughterside village. However, being due south of Oughterside it will have much more of an impact on the village than on its owners. This is due to the prevailing wind direction and any resulting potential noise problems, and the probability of shadow flicker. b) Public consultation – The Action Group note that the applicant’s letters make much of the amount of electricity used by the farm and their need to offset the overall variability of the farms electricity costs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ALLERDALE DISTRICT WARDS REVIEW 2016 an Initial Submission
    ALLERDALE DISTRICT WARDS REVIEW 2016 An initial submission on behalf of the Labour Group of Allerdale Councillors. A. Methodology for Area allocations The starting point for this submission to the review process is that the Allerdale District is made up of seven Areas, each centred on a town as service centre and its hinterland. These areas were first defined by the County Council as part of its initiation of the “Neighbourhood Forms” concept in the late 1980s and have evolved since into the pattern now used by Allerdale Council for engagement with members and localities, shown in this map: The map was originally based on school catchment areas. Following a review of “natural communities” by the Health service in 2000, it began to be used to define primary care boundaries. Under localism and devolution policy in the 2000s it was also used to define neighbourhood policing areas, community regeneration areas, childrens centre areas, parish council groupings, and planning policy areas, amongst others. Although some organisations, under budget pressures, have resiled from earlier commitments to use these Areas for organisation and service planning, they remain the most appropriate basis for any division of Allerdale into smaller areas. Accordingly it is suggested that these Areas should be the starting point for consideration of ward boundaries – following the pattern of the parliamentary boundary review which uses counties within the Region as its starting point. The first step is therefore to define the quota, making an assumption of 48 members as the size of the Council based a) on the actual electorate in 2016 (a quota of 1576 electors); and b) on the forecast electorate in 2022 as estimated by the Elections Officer at the Council (a quota of 1622 electors).
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Oughterside and Allerby Parish Council
    MINUTES OF OUGHTERSIDE AND ALLERBY PARISH COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY 9TH MAY 2017 AT 7.20PM IN PROSPECT VILLAGE HALL Present O&A Parish Councillors Mrs L Preston-Miller (acting chairman) Mrs P Lukeman Mrs L Milton Mr J Cowan. Parish Clerk Mr M Milner Allerdale Borough Councillor Mr J Lister ABC Cumbria County Councillor Hugo Martin CCC Members of the Public 2 members of the public present Bob Scott. O&A Lengthsman Meeting Opened: The chairman declared the meeting open at 7.20pm. 166.00 Apologises Mr P Milton (chairman) 167.00 Declaration of interests None 168.00 To approve and accept the minutes of the last meeting held on Tuesday 11th April, as a true record. 168.01. The minutes were proposed for acceptance by Cllr L P-M and seconded by Cllr L.M and unanimously accepted by the council. Chairman signed as a true record. Page 57 (1 of 5) Chairman’s signature………………………………………...…13th June 2017 169.00 Public Participation Session. 15 minutes allowed. 169.01 The clerk had 2 outstanding items, minute 155.05 concerning the traffic survey, Highways have advised that O&A are on the list but it could be a few weeks yet. Minute 155.09 Highways ref W171435027, pot hole opposite 3/5 Moorside is still being assessed. 169.02 The problems with driveway at Greenway are still under review and clerk to chase again and advise property owner of the job number. 169.03 Clerk, asked about the flag Pole and bus stop flag at Temple Bank, he was unable to give a time for its replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Allerdale Borough Council 2/2008/0261
    Allerdale Borough Council 2/2008/0261 Reference No: 2/2008/0261 Received: 12 March 2008 Proposed Construction of six wind turbines and associated Development: infrastructure designed to enable site access, wind monitoring and the generation of electricity for export to the Local Electricity Distribution Network Drawing Numbers: Location: Hill Farm Tallentire Cockermouth Applicant: Renewable Energy Systems UK and Ireland Ltd Constraints: Radon Assessment National Park Boundary Allerdale Flood Zone 1 British Coal Area ASCA Area ASCA Area ASCA Area ASCA Area Policies: National Planning Statements (Draft) EN-1 – National Policy Statement for Energy EN-3 – Energy Infrastructure National Planning Policies PPS22 – Renewable Energy (and the Companion Guide) PPS1 – Delivering Sustainable Development (Annexe on Climate Change) The Government has recently deleted the North West of England Plan Regional Spatial Strategy to 2021, therefore its planning policies are no longer a material planning consideration. Cumbria and Lake District Joint Structure Plan 2001- 2016 (Saved) Policy ST4 – Not applicable as the scheme constitutes a ‘small group’. Policy R44 - Renewable energy outside the Lake District National Park and AONBs Policy E34 – Areas and features of natioanl and international conservation importance. Policy E35 – Areas and features of nature conservation interest other than those of national and international conservation importance. Policy E37 - Landscape character Allerdale Local Plan, Adopted 1999 (Saved) Policy CO22 - Protection of archaeological
    [Show full text]
  • (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
    Status: Point in time view as at 23/05/2017. Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2015 No. 596 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ENGLAND The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 Made - - - - 18th March 2015 Laid before Parliament 24th March 2015 Coming into force - - 15th April 2015 The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 59, 60, 61, 74 and 333(7) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 F1 and section 54 of the Coal Industry Act 1994 F2, makes the following Order: F1 1990 c. 8. Section 59 was amended by section 1 of, and Schedule 1 to, the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 (c. 27); section 60 was amended by section 4(1) of the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013; section 74 was amended by section 121 of, and Schedule 12 to, the Localism Act 2011 (c. 20), sections 19(1) and 32 of, and Schedule 7 to, the Planning and Compensation Act 1991 (c. 34) and section 344 of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (c. 29). F2 1994 c. 21, to which there is an amendment not relevant to this Order. Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Order modified (23.2.2017) by High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Act 2017 (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Group
    FAO [email protected] Allerdale Boundary Commission Review Part 2 Submission of the Independent Group Introduction The Independent Group met on Thursday 1st December to consider the proposals tabled by Officers at the Group Leaders' Meeting the preceding Monday 28th November. Being a group not affiliated with any political party, the group's six members main concern is to properly represent the views of their respective electorates specifically in: • Dalton Ward • Broughton St Bridgets Ward • Harrington Workington Ward • All Saints Cockermouth Ward • Keswick Ward • Aspatria Ward In relation to the boundary review process Part 2, its nature is such that members of the group have engaged in general discussion within e.g. local parish councils on the matter, but have not until the week commencing 28th November been in a position to consider the implications both locally or more widely arising from the work of the Officer group which was not made available until that date. The three major Groups in Allerdale – Labour, Conservatives and Independent – have all shared thoughts as the process has advanced over recent weeks, both through the Leaders' Group but also informally between those councillors who have taken the lead within each group for 'number-crunching' and map-making. Much common ground has emerged, but there are of course differences which in large part are probably conditioned by the fact that in most wards political representation tends to be the monopoly of a single party. This in turn both enhances the ability of winning parties to articulate the needs and perceptions of those communities, but simultaneously diminishes their ability to speak with equal authority on the needs and perceptions of communities they have little experience of representing.
    [Show full text]
  • Allerdale Below Derwent Ward
    DO BE CAUTIOUS ABOUT INTERPRETATION OF THESE FIGURES. See The Introduction statement POPULATION INDICATORS ALLERDALE BELOW DERWENT WARD Heysham Census Heysham Census National Ecclesiastical Ecclesiastical Returns Households Population Protestation Returns Population data Diocese Census Denton Population Census National Census National Census National Multipliers 4.75 3.6 4.75 DATE 1563 1642 1676 1688 1750 1781 1801 1891 2001 2011 STATUS R E R R R R E R R R R R R R TOWNSHIP ITEM H P H P P H P H H P P P P H Key: R = Recorded; E = Estimated H = Households P = people ND No data Ancient Parish Allhallows Allhallows 20 95 43 155 194 30 143 ND ND ND 173 832 548 273 Aspatria and Brayton Aspatria and Brayton 140 665 ND ND 354 126 599 ND ND ND 943 4435 4121 1742 Bassenthwaite Bassenthwaite 60 285 ND ND 154 106 504 ND ND ND 450 ND 412 218 Bolton(s) Bolton(s) 111 527 ND ND 163 126 599 142 154 ND 695 936 585 291 Bridekirk Bridekirk 140 665 311 1120 642 204 969 275 284 ND 1410 3498 3495 1623 Bromfield Bromfield 200 950 288 1037 416 222 1055 ND ND ND 1947 1515 1239 615 Caldbeck Caldbeck 182 865 339 1220 670 191 907 205 236 ND 1171 1127 714 369 Camerton Camerton 58 276 78 281 ND 68 323 ND ND ND 633 3474 5033 2243 Cross Canonby Cross Canonby 31 147 76 274 98 42 200 50 355 ND 3252 9196 12329 5195 Dearham Dearham 70 333 80 288 203 110 523 ND 120 ND 874 7069 2028 915 Flimby Flimby (49) (233) ND ND ND 70 333 ND ND ND 273 2415 ND 780 Gilcrux Gilcrux 35 166 58 209 173 44 209 39 41 189 249 872 303 148 Holme Cultram Holme Cultram 300 1425 646 2326 ND 469 2218
    [Show full text]
  • The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2015 No. 596 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ENGLAND The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 Made - - - - 18th March 2015 Laid before Parliament 24th March 2015 Coming into force - - 15th April 2015 CONTENTS 1. Citation, commencement and application 2 2. Interpretation 2 3. Permitted development 7 4. Directions restricting permitted development 9 5. Directions restricting certain minerals permitted development 10 6. Directions: general 11 7. Prior approval applications: time periods for decision 11 8. Revocations and saving 11 SCHEDULE 1 13 PART 1 — Article 2(3) land 13 PART 2 — Article 2(4) land 13 PART 3 — Article 2(5) land 14 SCHEDULE 2 — Permitted development rights 16 PART 1 — Development within the curtilage of a dwellinghouse 16 PART 2 — Minor operations 24 PART 3 — Changes of use 27 PART 4 — Temporary buildings and uses 50 PART 5 — Caravan sites and recreational campsites 57 PART 6 — Agricultural and forestry 58 PART 7 — Non-domestic extensions, alterations etc 67 PART 8 — Transport related development 80 PART 9 — Development relating to roads 85 PART 10 — Repairs to services 89 PART 11 — Heritage and demolition 89 PART 12 — Development by local authorities 93 PART 13 — Water and sewerage 94 PART 14 — Renewable energy 98 PART 15 — Power related development 109 PART 16 — Communications 112 PART 17 — Mining and mineral exploration 124 PART 18 — Miscellaneous development 138 PART 19 — Development by the Crown or for national security purposes 139 SCHEDULE 3 — Procedures for Article 4 directions 152 SCHEDULE 4 — Statutory Instruments revoked in so far as they apply to England 156 The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 59, 60, 61, 74 and 333(7) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990( a) and section 54 of the Coal Industry Act 1994( b), makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkbride, Kirkland • And- Blencarne, Kirklinton Middle
    5924 Kirkbride, Kirkland • and- Blencarne, Kirklinton Torpenhow and Whitrigg, Uldale, Ulpha, Under- Middle, Kirkoswald, Lamonby,: Lazonby, Linstock, skiddaw Wabberthwaite, Wei^diker, Westward^ Longwathy, Longburgh, Matterdale, Melmerby, Wbicham, Whinfell, Wbitbeck, Whitehaven* Middleseeugh and Braithwaite, Moorhouse, Winscales,. Workington,1 Wythorp; and the place Mosedale, Mungrisdale, Newbiggen, Newton, of election to be at Carlisle, in the said county, Nicholforest, Northsceugh, Orton, Oughterby, for the Eastern Division, and at Cockermouth,' in Oulton, Ousby, Parton and Micklethwaite the said county, for the-Western Division; and the Penrith, Plumpton Wall, Renwick, Rickerby, said justices further represent that the reasons'oa Rickergate, RocklifF, Salkeld Great, . Salkeld which such petition is founded are, that any in- Little, Scaleby, Scotby, Scotch-street, Sebergham, terference of one coroner with another will be =Skelton, Shirwith, Solport, Soulby, Staffield, thereby prevented, that .the expense to the county Stainton (Dacre), Stainton (Stanwix), Stanwix, of holding inquests will be thereby lessened, that Stapletpn, Talkin, Tarraby, Thomas-close, the election.of coroners in future will be attended Threlkeld, Thursby, Trough, Unthank, Upperby, with less inconvenience, and the costs and expense Walton High, "Walton Low, Warwick, Waterhead, of such elections diminished : Watermillockj Waverton High and Low, West- Now, therefore^ Her Majesty; having taken the linson, Wetheral, Wigton, Woodside, Wreay; said petition into consideration,
    [Show full text]
  • Examples and Case Studies on Shared Services
    Examples and Case Studies on Shared Services Adopted by Smaller Councils Committee – 27 January 2015 1. Buckinghamshire County Council - a new ‘clusters’ initiative ............................................... 2 2. Joint Working Examples of Lincolnshire County Council & Saltfleetby Parish Council Liaison .................................................................................................................................. 2 3. Working Together in Dorset .................................................................................................. 3 4. Parish Partnership fund boosted by SAM road safety funds with Town and Parish Councils in Norfolk ............................................................................................................... 7 5. Parishes Working Together (Nottinghamshire) ..................................................................... 8 6. Parish Clusters in Essex ........................................................................................................ 12 7. Other Clustering examples for smaller councils .................................................................. 14 Examples and Case Studies on Shared Services.docx Page 1 of 20 1. Buckinghamshire County Council - a new ‘clusters’ initiative Buckinghamshire County Council (BCC) is proposing to give parish councils greater powers as part of a new ‘clusters’ initiative it plans to implement. The parish council clusters – of between five and 20 authorities – would manage services in each parish, rather than through
    [Show full text]
  • Private 2.04.9012
    DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATION COMMITTEE 21 July 2004 A Report by the Head of Environment _________________________________________________________________________________________ ___ Application No. 2/04/9012 District Allerdale Applicant United Utilities Parish Oughterside and Allerby Great Sankey Warrington Date of Receipt 11 June 2004 _________________________________________________________________________________________ ___ PROPOSAL Erection of a control building and a blower building; Wastewater Treatment Works, Allerby, Maryport _________________________________________________________________________________________ ___ 1.0 RECOMMENDATION 1.1 That planning permission is GRANTED for the reasons set out in Appendix 1 subject to the following conditions, providing that no adverse comments that would warrant reconsidering this application are received by 12 July 2004: 1. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved scheme. Any variations to the approved scheme shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority prior to being carried out. Reason: To ensure the development is carried out to an approved appropriate standard. 2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 Planning permission was granted in August 2003 for an extension to the existing WwTW site to contain a new wastewater plant with control and blower buildings in order to improve treated water quality to meet more stringent discharge consents. 2.2 This application proposes to increase the size of the control building from 6.4m x 3.1m x 3.4 high to 9.5 x 3.5 x 3.8m high in order to accommodate additional equipment, and the blower building from 3.4m x 2.7m x 3.3m high to 6.0x x 2.7m x 3.7m high. They would have natural slate roofs, rough cast/wet render walls and grey steel powder coated doors and frames as previously approved.
    [Show full text]
  • AGM Draft Minutes of 17Th September 2020
    Cumbria Association of Local Councils Allerdale District Minutes of the annual meeting of the Allerdale district of the Cumbria Association of Local Councils and three tier meeting 17th September 2020 The Meeting was held remotely on the Zoom platform PRESENT:- Mike Milner (Oughterside and Allerby PC)( Lorton PC) (Loweswater PC)(Buttermere PC) Trevor Gear (Allhallows PC Geoff Davies (Above Derwent PC) Joanne Collins (Plumbland PC) Marian Fitzgerald (ABC) Ray McCreadie (Thursby PC) Don Thoburn (Above Derwent PC) Helen Barlow (Thursby PC) David Wilson (Brigham PC) Joy Pemberton –Pigott (Above Derwent PC) Samantha Bagshaw (Calc) Becx Carter (Embleton PC)(Broughton PC)(St John’s Castlerigg and Wythburn) (Underskiddaw PC)(Borrowdale PC) Freda Chapman (Borrowdale PC) Lizzie Shaw (CCC) Chris Shaw (Calc Allerdale Liaison Officer) Welcome and Apologies Chris Shaw said h would chair the Calc AGM and Marion Fitzgerald asked that he chair the 3 tier section given that he was the host and held the Zoom controls This was agreed. There was an apology from Ian Hinde (Allerdale BC) 1. Minutes of the Allerdale association annual meeting October 2020 meeting The minutes had been circulated earlier and were agreed. Matters arising. The liaison officer said that the issue of the Transparency Regulations had been covered at the October 2019 meeting and whilst there were very many councils who were compliant there remained some problems. He said that only in the last week he had looked at a parish council website in Allerdale when the last minutes on the website were from June 2019. He also referred to the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) Accessibility Regulations 2018 which aim to ensure reasonable adjustments to websites are made, so they are accessible to people with various disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • OUGHTERSIDE and ALLERBY PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting Held on Tuesday 11Th Dec’ 2018
    OUGHTERSIDE AND ALLERBY PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the parish council meeting held on Tuesday 11th Dec’ 2018 Meeting Opened: The chairman declared the meeting open at 7.03pm. Present: Cllrs Mrs L Preston-Miller (chair), J Cowan, A Morris Allerdale Borough and Cumbria County Councillors: None present Clerk: Mike Milner Members of the public: 2 408.00 Apologises for absence: Mrs P Lukeman (O&A) 409.00 Declaration of interests: None 410.00 To read and approve the minutes of the last meeting held on Tuesday 13th November 2018. 410.01. Resolved to approve the minutes as a true and accurate record. 411.00 Public Participation Session. 15 minutes allowed. Clerk advised: - 411.01 minute 395.02 refers No Through Road post still not repaired at Oughterside, but member of public advised workmen were seen there on Monday. 411.02 Well Road sign still saying Well Lane, clerk to chase 411.03 Cllr J.C had advised clerk River Ellen bank being repaired. 411.04 Cllr J.C had also advised clerk trees had been pollarded along Well Road. 411.05 Oughterside street lights No8 and No20 reported to Highway’s for repair, but not their responsibility so clerk had reported to Allerdale B.C and assured they would be repaired. 411.06 Cllr A.M had advised about glass in Pond Green play area, Cllr J.C had cleared up. 411.07 Clerk advised that although River Ellen had been repaired, concerns at another area. Cllr J.C would try and photograph the area for clerk, but Cllr felt the river was a long way from concerns about the road.
    [Show full text]