DOCSLIB.ORG

Nordic Study of Classification Systems for Infrastructure & Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nordic Study of Classification Systems for Infrastructure & Transportation Nordic Study of Classification Systems for Infrastructure & Transportation Author: Phil Jackson Version 1.0 July 2020 bSI Document Number: IR-2020-1022-TR Practical Requirements for Classification of Information in Digital Engineering & BIM Report Key Contributors: Knowledge without understanding is meaningless. – Douglas Adams – ‘The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy’ We are stuck with technology when all we really want is just stuff that works. How do you recognize something that is still technology? A good clue is if it comes with a manual. – Douglas Adams – ‘The Salmon of Doubt: Hitchhiking the Galaxy One Last Time’ 2 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................ 6 2 Conclusions Summary ........................................................................... 6 3 Introduction ............................................................................................. 8 3.1 Background ....................................................................................... 8 3.2 Authors Note ..................................................................................... 9 3.3 Brief ................................................................................................... 9 4 Research ................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Desk Study of Classification Standards and History .................. 11 4.1.1 Related Standards...................................................................... 11 4.1.2 Classification System Implementations ...................................... 11 4.2 Meetings with Organisations ......................................................... 11 4.3 Conversations with Colleagues and Other Projects .................... 12 5 The Digital Information Challenge ....................................................... 13 5.1 Analogue to Digital ......................................................................... 13 5.2 Bridging the Gap ............................................................................. 13 5.3 Labelling Intelligence to Smart Sharing........................................ 14 6 Defining Classification .......................................................................... 16 6.1 What is Classification ..................................................................... 16 6.2 Is Classification Necessary ............................................................ 17 6.3 Classification Principles ................................................................ 17 6.3.1 Taxonomies ................................................................................ 17 6.3.2 Concepts .................................................................................... 18 6.3.3 Enumerated or Hierarchical Classification .................................. 18 6.3.4 Multi-Faceted Classification ....................................................... 18 6.3.5 Example Categorisation, Grouping & Facets ............................. 18 6.4 Critical Criteria for Classification .................................................. 20 6.4.1 Practical, Useable and Understandable ..................................... 20 6.4.2 Sector/Domain Neutral ............................................................... 20 6.4.3 Asset Centric .............................................................................. 20 6.4.4 Digital ......................................................................................... 21 6.4.5 Digital Twins ............................................................................... 21 6.4.6 Support a System of Systems .................................................... 22 6.4.7 Support Full Life Cycle of Assets ............................................... 23 6.4.8 Level of Information (LoX) .......................................................... 24 6.4.9 Consistent Modelling, Referencing and Naming in BIM Applications ............................................................................................. 25 6.4.10 Location & Recognising the Continuous Nature of Infrastructure 25 6.4.11 Discovery of Assets in Point Clouds and Photographs............... 26 6.4.12 Legacy Supporting ..................................................................... 26 6.4.13 Maintained and Freely Available at the Point of Use .................. 26 6.4.14 Global ......................................................................................... 27 6.4.15 Smart Infrastructure Enabling ..................................................... 28 6.5 Support for Cloud/Edge/Internet Semantically Linked Data ....... 30 6.6 Big Data Supporting ....................................................................... 30 7 Why Classify .......................................................................................... 32 3 7.1 Grouping things .............................................................................. 32 7.2 Adding Intelligence ......................................................................... 32 7.3 Intelligently tagging things ............................................................ 33 7.4 Where to find things ....................................................................... 33 7.5 Where things are stored ................................................................. 33 7.6 Naming things ................................................................................. 33 7.7 Uniquely Identifying at Instantiation ............................................. 33 7.8 Templating Properties to Collect ................................................... 33 7.9 Consistency .................................................................................... 33 7.10 Relating and Linking things ........................................................... 33 7.11 Advice on what to store about things ........................................... 35 7.12 Enabling analysis of things ........................................................... 35 7.13 Understanding things ..................................................................... 35 7.14 A holistic view ................................................................................. 37 8 Information Users .................................................................................. 39 8.1 Functional Stakeholders ................................................................ 39 8.1.1 Planners ..................................................................................... 39 8.1.2 Cost Consultants ........................................................................ 39 8.1.3 Designers ................................................................................... 40 8.1.4 Construction Users ..................................................................... 40 8.1.5 Programme and Project Managers............................................. 41 8.1.6 Asset Owners ............................................................................. 41 8.1.7 Asset Managers ......................................................................... 41 8.1.8 Asset Users ................................................................................ 41 8.2 Smart Infrastructure ....................................................................... 41 8.3 Social Interaction ............................................................................ 42 9 Classification Uses ............................................................................... 43 Functional Breakdown ....................................................................... 43 System Breakdown ............................................................................ 43 Component Breakdown ..................................................................... 43 Product Libraries ............................................................................... 43 Quantities ........................................................................................... 43 Cost ..................................................................................................... 43 Value ................................................................................................... 43 Work Breakdown ................................................................................ 43 Asset Maintenance ............................................................................. 43 Asset Operation ................................................................................. 43 Location .............................................................................................. 43 Relationships & Connectivity ........................................................... 43 Process ............................................................................................... 43 10 Classification for Data Modelling ...................................................... 44 10.1 Ontologies ....................................................................................... 44 10.2 Modelling Languages and Techniques ......................................... 44 10.3 Object Type Libraries ..................................................................... 45 10.4 Semantic Web ................................................................................. 46 10.5 Linked Data ..................................................................................... 46 10.6 Is infrastructure industry ready for semantically linked data? ... 47 10.7 Object Type Libraries
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building Information Modelling (BIM) Standardization
    Building Information Modelling (BIM) standardization Martin Poljanšek 2017 This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Martin Poljanšek Address: Via E. Fermi 2749, Ispra (VA) 21027, Italy Email: [email protected] Tel.: +32 39 0332 78 9021 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC109656 EUR 28977 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-77206-1 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/36471 Ispra: European Commission, 2017 © European Union, 2017 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. How to cite this report: Author(s), Title, EUR (where available), Publisher, Publisher City, Year of Publication, ISBN (where available), doi (where available), PUBSY No. Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 2 2 Building Information Modelling (BIM) ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Top-Level Ontologies to Inform the Ontological Choices for a Foundation Data Model
    A survey of Top-Level Ontologies To inform the ontological choices for a Foundation Data Model Version 1 Contents 1 Introduction and Purpose 3 F.13 FrameNet 92 2 Approach and contents 4 F.14 GFO – General Formal Ontology 94 2.1 Collect candidate top-level ontologies 4 F.15 gist 95 2.2 Develop assessment framework 4 F.16 HQDM – High Quality Data Models 97 2.3 Assessment of candidate top-level ontologies F.17 IDEAS – International Defence Enterprise against the framework 5 Architecture Specification 99 2.4 Terminological note 5 F.18 IEC 62541 100 3 Assessment framework – development basis 6 F.19 IEC 63088 100 3.1 General ontological requirements 6 F.20 ISO 12006-3 101 3.2 Overarching ontological architecture F.21 ISO 15926-2 102 framework 8 F.22 KKO: KBpedia Knowledge Ontology 103 4 Ontological commitment overview 11 F.23 KR Ontology – Knowledge Representation 4.1 General choices 11 Ontology 105 4.2 Formal structure – horizontal and vertical 14 F.24 MarineTLO: A Top-Level 4.3 Universal commitments 33 Ontology for the Marine Domain 106 5 Assessment Framework Results 37 F. 25 MIMOSA CCOM – (Common Conceptual 5.1 General choices 37 Object Model) 108 5.2 Formal structure: vertical aspects 38 F.26 OWL – Web Ontology Language 110 5.3 Formal structure: horizontal aspects 42 F.27 ProtOn – PROTo ONtology 111 5.4 Universal commitments 44 F.28 Schema.org 112 6 Summary 46 F.29 SENSUS 113 Appendix A F.30 SKOS 113 Pathway requirements for a Foundation Data F.31 SUMO 115 Model 48 F.32 TMRM/TMDM – Topic Map Reference/Data Appendix B Models 116 ISO IEC 21838-1:2019
    [Show full text]
  • Publicação Oficial De Fevereiro De 2020
    DOCUMENTOS normativos Publicação Oficial do IPQ enquanto Organismo Nacional de Normalização de 17 de fevereiro de 2020 Publicação oficial do IPQ, enquanto Organismo Nacional de Normalização Período de 16-01-2020 a 17-02-2020 A presente publicação tem por objetivo divulgar a atividade normativa desenvolvida a nível nacional, europeu e internacional no período acima referido. Conteúdo 1. Normas e outros Documentos Normativos Portugueses ................................................................................ 3 1.1 Normas Portuguesas editadas .................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Documentos Normativos Portugueses editados ................................................................................. 4 1.3 Documentos Normativos Portugueses anulados ................................................................................ 5 1.4 Normas Europeias adotadas ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.5 Normas Portuguesas em reexame ........................................................................................................ 16 1.6 Documentos Normativos Portugueses confirmados (após reexame) ........................................ 17 1.7 Documentos Normativos portugueses editados noutros idiomas ................................................ 18 2. Documentos Normativos Europeus Publicados ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Conceptual Mapping Standard to Link Building and Geospatial Information
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Development of a Conceptual Mapping Standard to Link Building and Geospatial Information Taewook Kang Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Ilsanseo-Gu Goyang-Si 10223, Korea; [email protected]; Tel.: +82-010-3008-5143 Received: 18 February 2018; Accepted: 19 April 2018; Published: 24 April 2018 Abstract: This study introduces the BIM (building information modeling)-GIS (geographic information system) conceptual mapping (B2GM) standard ISO N19166 and proposes a mapping mechanism. In addition, the major issues concerning BIM-GIS integration, and the considerations that it requires, are discussed. The B2GM is currently being standardized by the spatial-information international standardization organization TC211. Previous studies on BIM-GIS integration seem to focus on the integration of different types of model schemas and on the implementation of service interfaces. B2GM concerns the clear definition of the conditions and methods for mapping the object information required from the user’s use-case viewpoint for city-scale mapping. The benefits of the B2GM approach are that the user is able directly control the BIM-GIS linkage and integration process in order to acquire the necessary objection information. This can reveal cases of possibly unclear BIM-GIS integration outside the black box in an explicit and standard way, so that the user can distinctively predict the final output obtainable from the BIM-GIS integration. This study examined B2GM in terms of its development background, components, and several utilization examples, as well as the levels and considerations of the integration of different BIM-GIS models. Keywords: BIM; GIS; conceptual mapping; ISO 19166; BG-IL 1.
    [Show full text]
  • National Standardization Plan 2019-2022
    FINAL APRIL 2020 NATIONAL STANDARDIZATION PLAN 2019-2022 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 2 Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Economic Priorities (Economic Impact Strategy) ................................................................................ 5 3.2 Government Policy Priorities ............................................................................................................ 12 3.3 Non-Economic Priorities (Social Impact Strategy) ............................................................................ 14 3.4 Stakeholders requests (Stakeholder Engagement Strategy) ............................................................. 15 3.5 Selected Sectors of Standardization and Expected Benefits ............................................................. 16 3.5.2 Benefits of Selected Sectors and Sub-Sectors of Standardization ................................................ 17 4 Needed Human and Financial Resources and Work Items Implementation Plan............................................ 19 4.1 Human Resources by Type of Work Item and Category ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Data Management Plan (First Version)
    Open Sea Operating Experience to Reduce Wave Energy Costs Deliverable D8.5 Data Management Plan (first version) Lead Beneficiary TECNALIA Delivery date 2016-07-27 Dissemination level Public Status Approved Version 1.0 Keywords Open access, datasets, metadata, ZENODO This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 654444 D8.5 Data Management Plan (first version) Disclaimer This Deliverable reflects only the author’s views and the Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein Document Information Grant Agreement Number 654444 Project Acronym OPERA Work Package WP 8 Task(s) T8.2 Deliverable D8.5 Title Data Management Plan (first version) Author(s) Pablo Ruiz-Minguela (TECNALIA), Endika Aldaiturriaga (OCEANTEC) File Name OPERA_D8.5_Data management plan_TECNALIA_20160727_v1.0.docx Change Record Revision Date Description Reviewer 0.0 14-04-2016 Initial outline Pablo Ruiz-Minguela 0.5 21-06-2016 Full draft contents WP8 partners 0.9 15-07-2016 Version for peer review Sara Armstrong (UCC) 1.0 27-07-2016 Final deliverable to EC EC OPERA Deliverable, Grant Agreement No 654444 Page 2 | 30 D8.5 Data Management Plan (first version) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document, D8.5 Data Management Plan (DMP) is a deliverable of the OPERA project, which is funded by the European Union’s H2020 Programme under Grant Agreement #654444. OPERA’s main goal is to collect, analyse and share open sea operating data and experience to validate and de-risk four industrial innovations for wave energy opening the way to long term cost reduction of over 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements, Development, and Evaluation of a National Building Standard—A Swedish Case Study
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Requirements, Development, and Evaluation of A National Building Standard—A Swedish Case Study Helen Eriksson 1,2,*, Tim Johansson 3 , Per-Ola Olsson 2, Maria Andersson 1, Jakob Engvall 1, Isak Hast 1 and Lars Harrie 2 1 Lantmäteriet, Lantmäterigatan 2 C, SE- 801 82 Gävle, Sweden; [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (J.E.); [email protected] (I.H.) 2 Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden; [email protected] (P.-O.O.), [email protected] (L.H.) 3 Division of Resources, Energy and Infrastructure, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 December 2019; Accepted: 27 January 2020; Published: 31 January 2020 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present a proposal for a national building standard in Sweden. We define requirements for the proposed standard, e.g., it should support development of 3D city models, connect to building information models (BIM) and national registers and be based on a national classification system for the urban environment. Based on these requirements we develop an Application Domain Extension (ADE) of the building model in the proposed CityGML 3.0 standard denoted CityGML Sve-Test. CityGML 3.0 includes several new features of interest, e.g., the space concept, enhanced possibilities to convert data, and to link to other standards. In our study we create test data according to CityGML Sve-Test and evaluate it against the requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Use of Information in Geotechnics
    Work Package 1-194 Improved use of information in Geotechnics Final Report Part 1 - Overview and recommendations 19 April 2018 Version 2.0 Arup Aecom Consortium providing Highways England with road transport related technical consultancy services Document Control Document Title Work Package 1-194 - Improving the use of geotechnical information Part 1 - Overview and recommendations Owner Neil Chadwick Distribution Document Status ISSUE Revision History Version Date Description Authors 1.0 12/03/2018 Issue to client Neil Chadwick and Tony Daly 2.0 19/04/2018 Incorporated client comments Neil Chadwick and Tony Daly Reviewer List Name Role Savina Carluccio Arup Project Manager David Patterson Client Package Sponsor Signoff List Name Role David Patterson Client Package Sponsor This is a controlled document. This document is only valid on the day it was printed. Please contact the Document owner for location details or printing problems. On receipt of a new version, please destroy all previous versions. Task 1-194 Improved use of information in geotechnics Page 2 of 28 Table of contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Purpose and scope of study .......................................................................................... 4 1.2. Outputs .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Anticipated benefits ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture for OIIE & OGI Pilot
    Standardising Standards-based Interoperability: The Architecture of the OIIE and OGI Pilot Matt Selway and Markus Stumptner (Co-CTO MIMOSA) University of South Australia June 4, 2019 NIST Open Industrial Digital Ecosystem Summit AI and Software Engineering Group • About 20 people • AI + Software Engineering + Data Management • Major topics • Modelling and reasoning about system behaviour • Diagnostics, Configuration, Automated Debugging, Natural Language • Information and knowledge management in distributed ecosystems Projects in the Ecosystem Space • OT/IT Interoperability • Digital Information Energy Australia Gateway • OGI Pilot - OIIE • Genetic Data Curation • SOA for Future Combat Systems • Automated Modelling for Combat Simulation Ecosystems • Integrated Law Enforcement – Federated Data Platform AFP What is the OIIE? ▪ Open Industrial Interoperability Ecosystem ▪ Framework and architecture for defining and describing standardised and standards-based ways for how systems should interoperate ▪ Aims to support Digitalization, Supplier-neutral, and enable COTS & Open Source Plug ‘n Play Interoperability ▪ Refinement of concepts MIMOSA has been developing for ~15 years ▪ Includes several components: ➢Use Case Architecture ➢Connectivity and Services Architecture ➢Data and Message Models ➢Specifications for systems supporting Ecosystem Administration, e.g: • ws-ISBM, SDAIR, CIR, Services Registry © MIMOSA 2019 Supplier Neutral Industrial Digital Ecosystem Digital Ecosystem Concept Specialized For Process Industries Com- ponents EPC Supplier
    [Show full text]
  • Bim Understanding and Activities
    Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations II 3 BIM UNDERSTANDING AND ACTIVITIES EILIF HJELSETH Department of Civil Engineering and Energy Technology, Faculty of Technology, Art, and Design, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Norway ABSTRACT The AECOO (architects, engineers, contractors, operators, owners) industry is moving toward increased digitalization. This unstoppable process requires a clear understanding of the important elements required to reach the defined objectives. The change of process – how we work and interact – is often highlighted as one of the most important objectives for the AECOO industry. BIM, which can stand for building information model, modelling, or management, is one of the enablers and most highlighted initiatives in digitalisation, but there is no joint understanding of BIM. However, our understating of BIM, and especially the M, will directly influence our actions related to implementing BIM with objectives that can be documented. This study is based on a literature review of scientific papers, the buildingSMART Norway newsletter, an overview of BIM-related ISO standards and BIM guidance, and experiences with the digital implementation of BIM guidance. Integrated design and delivery solutions (IDDS) focus on the integration of collaboration between people, integrated processes, and interoperable technology. It has, therefore, been used as a framework for exploring the dominating understanding of BIM. The findings from this study indicate that BIM primary is understood as the use of software programs. Activities for implementation are related to solving the technical aspect of the development of software as well as the exchange of files. Software skills and the use of software are used as indicators of the degree of BIM implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Septembrie 2019 • Revista Organismului Naţional De
    Septembrie 2019 • www.asro.ro StandardizareaRevista Organismului Naţional de Standardizare STANDARDIZAREA ISSN 1220-2061 PUBLICAŢIE OFICIALĂ A ASOCIAŢIEI DE STANDARDIZARE DIN ROMÂNIA COLEGIUL DE REDACŢIE Prof. Dr. Ing. Mircea Bejan – Universitatea Tehnică Cluj Napoca Cuprins Prof. Dr. Ing. Constantin Militaru – UP Bucureşti EDITORIAL Standarde pentru o lume sustenabilă �����������������������������������������������������������������������1 REDACŢIE STANDARDIZAREA NAȚIONALĂ Andreea Tărpescu Adina Hațegan Noutăți din standardizare ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 Claudiu Baciu Speranţa Stomff ASRO/CT 397, Dezvoltarea sustenabilă a infrastructurilor inteligente din cadrul orașelor și comunităților ��������������������������������������������������������6 COPERTA ŞI TEHNOREDACTARE Obiectivul de dezvoltare durabilă 11 – Orașe și comunități durabile ���8 Ştefania Kraus Standardele – Calea spre viitor������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 Foto coperta Adobe Stock Conferință cu prilejul Zilei Mondiale a Standardizării �����������������������������������12 LEGISLAŢIE ŞI STANDARDIZARE Noutăţi legislative din luna august 2019 ��������������������������������������������������������������13 STANDARDIZAREA EUROPEANĂ Noutăți din standardizarea europeană CEN-CENELEC ���������������������������������16 Noua generație 112 – NG112 ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������18 ASRO – Editura STANDARDIZAREA
    [Show full text]
  • Uma Aplicação Em Placas Cerâmicas Para Revestimento
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA - UFSC PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUÇÃO EM ENGENHARIA CIVIL - PPGEC CLASSIFICAÇÃO DA INFORMAÇÃO NA INDÚSTRIA DA CONSTRUÇÃO CIVIL: uma aplicação em placas cerâmicas para revestimento ANA MARIA DELAZARI TRISTÃO Florianópolis 2005 2 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA - UFSC PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUÇÃO EM ENGENHARIA CIVIL - PPGEC CLASSIFICAÇÃO DA INFORMAÇÃO NA INDÚSTRIA DA CONSTRUÇÃO CIVIL: uma aplicação em placas cerâmicas para revestimento Tese submetida à Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina como requisito parcial exigido pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil - PPGEC, para a obtenção do Título de Doutor em Engenharia Civil. Orientação: Prof. Orestes Estevan Alarcon ANA MARIA DELAZARI TRISTÃO Florianópolis 2005 3 ANA MARIA DELAZARI TRISTÃO CLASSIFICAÇÃO DA INFORMAÇÃO NA INDÚSTRIA DA CONSTRUÇÃO CIVIL: uma aplicação em placas cerâmicas para revestimento Tese submetida à Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina como requisito parcial exigido pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil - PPGEC, para a obtenção do Título de Doutor em Engenharia Civil. Florianópolis, 01 de julho de 2005. _____________________________________ Dr. Glicério Trichês - Coordenador do PPGEC COMISSÃO EXAMINADORA: ________________________________________________ Dr. Orestes Estevan Alarcon – Orientador – PGMAT/UFSC ______________________________________________________ Dr. Roberto Lamberts – Co-orientador - Professor do PPGEC/UFSC __________________________________________________________________ Dr. José Octávio Armani
    [Show full text]