DOCSLIB.ORG

Accounting History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accounting History Accounting History http://ach.sagepub.com/ Book review: Double Entry: How the Merchants of Venice Shaped the Modern World and How their Invention could Make or Break the Planet Alan Sangster Accounting History 2012 17: 501 DOI: 10.1177/1032373212450161 The online version of this article can be found at: http://ach.sagepub.com/content/17/3-4/501 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: The Accounting History Special Interest Group of the Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand Additional services and information for Accounting History can be found at: Email Alerts: http://ach.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://ach.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Aug 16, 2012 What is This? Downloaded from ach.sagepub.com at Griffith University on August 17, 2012 ACH173-410.1177/1032373212450161Book reviewAccounting History 4501612012 Accounting History Accounting History 17(3-4) 501 –510 Book review © The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav ach.sagepub.com J Gleeson-White Double Entry: How the Merchants of Venice Shaped the Modern World and How their Invention could Make or Break the Planet, Allen & Unwin: Sydney, 2011, 294 + viii pp.: ISBN: 9781741757552 Reviewed by: Alan Sangster, Griffith University, Australia DOI: 10.117/1032373212450161 This is a very interesting and easy to read book from which I gained a great deal of pleasure. The author should be commended on her courage and her success in absorbing and then retelling the history of a subject that those more equipped to do so have generally not done for the simple reason that the sum is greater than the parts – finding evidence is one thing, putting it all together in a coherent and internally consistent manner, is another. The Contents List is a challenging mixture of accounting history, economic history, and accounting - the art, the science, and the profession. The opening focus on the inability of account- ing, as we know it, to present in financial statements items other than those that can be expressed in monetary terms is both surprising and refreshing. The call made later in the book for a reinven- tion or redesign of an accounting which embraces such factors as the impact upon the environment is well written and argued, and extremely timely. Professor Rob Gray’s “elephant in the room” (2010, 2013) has rarely had such an outing in public, even if his writings and those of many others on the subject are strangely absent from this book. It is a difficult enough task to understand sufficiently well the treatise on bookkeeping contained in Luca Pacioli’s Summa Arithmetica of 1494, without attempting to also understand the activities and processes of accounting in the previous 200 and subsequent 500+ years – a modernised transla- tion of the treatise was sufficient to warrant a PhD (Cripps, 1995). This is not a minor task that Jane Gleeson-White set herself. In its fullness, it is nothing less than the work of an entire lifetime, and Jane Gleeson-White did it all in three years. Could this be possible? Today, with the freedom of the “library on your desktop” (Sangster, 1995: 3) finally realised, possibly, but it is still an enormous task requiring the reading of hundreds of articles, books, and websites. This was a challenge indeed and Jane Gleeson-White emerges from her travail with honour and achievement. Yet, speed is not the mother of all invention. Rather, it is the inevitable creator of shortcuts and assumptions arising from limited time to follow things through that are destined to leave questions only partially answered. Nevertheless, in this case, the flaws are not sufficient to devalue the whole. This is a very well-constructed book. I found some chapters particularly interesting: • The Preface is a superb, short, yet very informative introduction to the book. • Chapter 7 (“Double entry and capitalism – chicken and egg?”) which, while by no means covering the literature on this topic, nevertheless presents some worthy insights to the topic for those who have not encountered it previously. More from Basil Yamey would certainly Downloaded from ach.sagepub.com at Griffith University on August 17, 2012 502 Accounting History 17(3-4) not have gone amiss, as would the inclusion of material on capitalism and accounting in The Netherlands in the sixteenth century, where Funnell and Robertson (2011) suggest book- keeping practice derived not from Pacioli but from German business practices. • Chapter 8 (“John Maynard Keynes, double entry and the wealth of nations”) opens up a debate much needed to support and understand the Conclusion to the book. The material is brief and well-written, however, I do find the tenuous link to double entry bookkeeping something of a stretch. I seriously doubt if John Maynard Keynes had, as is implied on p.179, any great interest in, or more than a passing knowledge of the principles of double entry bookkeeping, if that. He will, however, have understood how to construct economic financial models of the economy using the principles of algebra, upon which the duality of double entry is based. The marvel of balance in an accounting system based upon double entry is a mathematical one, nothing more and nothing less, and Y = C + I is an algebraic equation, as is the accountant’s Capital = Assets – Liabilities. This wish of Jane Gleeson- White to brand everything under the umbrella of “double entry bookkeeping” is admirable, but, I would suggest, misplaced. • Chapter 9 (“The rise and scandalous rise of a profession”) is one of the highlights of the book. Some of the history recounted is incomplete and some of the statements made are misleading due to their inaccuracy, but the overall message of this chapter is strong and, I believe, appropriate. The author clearly believes that accounting scandals create more work for accountants, more demand for accounting services, and more jobs for accountants, and, in short, that accounting scandals are “good” for the accounting profession, and no one else. Accounting creates the image the decision makers wish it to create; accountants cannot agree on what is a “correct” interpretation of the data they have – and, much more. The man- ner in which the discussion towards the end of the chapter moves from accounting scandals to the $200 Big Mac and then to a very brief discussion of the flaws of GDP is very well done and a very good lead-in to Chapter 10. • Chapter 10 (“Gross Domestic Product and how accounting could make or break the planet”) and the Epilogue chapter are thought provoking and a wonderful climax to this excellent book. Among specific criticisms I have of the choice of content of the book, the “rules versus princi- ples” distinction is introduced too briefly on pp.156–157, and the not very convincing link to the “is accounting a science?” debate is one of the low points of this book. The computerisation of accounting is barely mentioned (p.204): surely something ought to have been included concerning how auditors responded? And, surely more could have been made of the changing world of accounting arising from eBusiness and eCommerce, and, not least, the far higher profile today of forensic accounting. Furthermore, surely something ought to have been included on the beginnings of accounting standards in the US in the 1930s and the UK in the 1940s. In the history of the dis- cipline, these were important steps and it is disappointing that Ms Gleeson-White seems to think that these initiatives originated in 1970 (p.206). While these appear to be small points and not so much strong negatives as an indication of how coverage of topics could be enlarged in subsequent editions, it is fair to say that the book is not “all good”. The first six chapters are a curate’s egg of under-researched and, sometimes, misunderstood analysis, accompanied by wonderful clarity and exposition of a seriously complicated story: the history of double entry bookkeeping. I compiled a long list of inaccuracies – 41 of them – while reading through these 160 pages. One incorrect statement every four pages is an exceptionally high error ratio if a book is to be taken seriously, and that is before consideration is taken of the virtual Downloaded from ach.sagepub.com at Griffith University on August 17, 2012 Book review 503 absence of a number of topics, not least charge and discharge accounting and the manner in which it survived for hundreds of years after the emergence of double entry bookkeeping. Double entry had a serious rival and yet Ms Gleeson-White gives the impression that as soon as Pacioli’s treatise was published in 1494, everyone adopted double entry and that businesses thrived and prospered as a result; neither is the case. As an accounting historian and specialist in Pacioli and the birth of double entry bookkeeping, I found the author’s approach to citation exceedingly odd and unhelpful. In 1942, R. Emmett Taylor produced his wonderful biography of Luca Pacioli, No Royal Road. The dust jacket reveals that the typists who worked on his manuscript found it humorous and pre-publication reviewers commented upon his success in recreating the life of the times of Pacioli, but that book has one serious flaw noted by every historian who has ever used it as a source of information: you often cannot tell or identify which of Taylor’s sources is related to which of his “facts”. This was the style of academic writing evident in early Anglo-Saxon articles on accounting and accounting history (as seen for example, in the Accounting Review in the 1920s) but, by the 1940s, the style was no longer in vogue and was certainly not considered helpful to either serious researchers or students.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Accounting Development
    Journal of History Culture and Art Research (ISSN: 2147-0626) Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi Vol. 6, No. 4, September 2017 Revue des Recherches en Histoire Culture et Art Copyright © Karabuk University http://kutaksam.karabuk.edu.tr ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔ DOI: 10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1163 Citation: Mukhametzyanov, R., Nugaev, F., & Muhametzyanova, L. (2017). History of Accounting Development. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), 1227-1236. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1163 History of Accounting Development Rinaz Z. Mukhametzyanov1, Fatih Sh. Nugaev2 Lyaisan Z. Muhametzyanova3 Abstract Everyone is well aware that accounting is one of the most important areas of economy, which has become so widespread in our lives today that it is impossible to imagine modern business and economy without this component. Accounting is a well thought out system that reflects the movement of various facts of economic life, no matter how different they are, and leads them into a common logical system. We can talk a lot about the features and possibilities of this science, but how often do we think about the ways this system arose, the ways of its development and becoming a separate science? During the study of this problem, an attempt was made to systematize various points of view regarding the origin and the development of accounting. After the result of the analysis, the authors identified regularities in the development of accounting and its methodical apparatus associated with the periodization of history on technological structures. Keywords: History of accounting development, Sources of accounting, Accounting, Techno- economic paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • ACCOUNTING and AUDITING in ROMAN SOCIETY Lance Elliot
    ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING IN ROMAN SOCIETY Lance Elliot LaGroue A dissertation thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2014 Approved by: Richard Talbert Fred Naiden Howard Aldrich Terrence McIntosh © 2014 Lance Elliot LaGroue ALL RIGHTS RESERVED II ABSTRACT Lance LaGroue: Accounting and Auditing in Roman Society (Under the direction of Richard Talbert) This dissertation approaches its topic from the pathbreaking dual perspective of a historian and of an accountant. It contributes to our understanding of Roman accounting in several notable ways. The style and approach of Roman documents are now categorized to reflect differing levels of complexity and sophistication. With the aid of this delineation, and by comparison with the practices of various other premodern societies, we can now more readily appreciate the distinct attributes present at each level in Roman accounting practices. Additionally, due to the greater accessibility of Roman accounting documents in recent years – in particular, through John Matthews’ work on the Journey of Theophanes, Dominic Rathbone’s study of the Heroninos archive, and the reading of the Vindolanda tablets -- it becomes easier to appreciate such differences among the few larger caches of accounting documents. Moreover, the dissertation seeks to distinguish varying grades of accountant. Above all, it emphasizes the need to separate the functions of accounting and auditing, and to gauge the essential characteristics and roles of both. In both regards, it is claimed, the Roman method showed competency. The dissertation further shows how economic and accounting theory has influenced perceptions about Roman accounting practices.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Genesis of Double Entry Bookkeeping Alan Sangster, Griffith University, Aust
    The Genesis of Double Entry Bookkeeping Alan Sangster, Griffith University, Australia ABSTRACT This study investigates the emergence in Italy early in the 13th century, if not before, of a new form of single entry bookkeeping which, thereafter, gave rise to the variant form we know as double entry bookkeeping. In doing so, it considers both primary and secondary sources and the language of bookkeeping at that time, along with its suitability for the purpose to which it was being put; and compares the new form of single entry to that of double entry, pinpointing the single factor necessary to convert the former into the latter. Contrary to the findings of previous investigations and the assumptions made in the literature concerning its origins linked to trade, both of which indicate that double entry was an invention of merchants, this paper concludes that the most likely form of enterprise where bookkeeping of this form would have started is a bank. And, as the one form of business for which knowing your debtors and creditors is fundamental to survival, it is the obvious and by far the most likely activity from which detailed single and then double entry bookkeeping emerged. Key words: single entry bookkeeping; double entry bookkeeping; bank accounts; merchant accounts; medieval accounting practice. BACKGROUND This study was prompted by the recent publication of a best-selling book which has popularized the history of double entry bookkeeping (Gleeson-White, 2011). In its title – Double Entry: How the Merchants of Venice Shaped the Modern World and How their Invention could Make or Break the Planet – the author tells us that merchants invented double entry bookkeeping.
    [Show full text]
  • New Business Combinations Accounting Rules and the Mergers and Acquisitions Activity
    NEW BUSINESS COMBINATIONS ACCOUNTING RULES AND THE MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS ACTIVITY HUMBERTO NUNO RITO RIBEIRO Doctor of Philosophy DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY LEICESTER BUSINESS SCHOOL November 2009 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. Leicester Business School, De Montfort University New Business Combinations Accounting Rules and the Mergers and Acquisitions Activity Humberto Nuno Rito Ribeiro Doctor of Philosophy 2009 Thesis Summary The perennial controversy in business combinations accounting and its dialectic with stakeholders’ interests under the complexity of the Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activity is the centrepiece of analysis in this thesis. It is argued here that the accounting regulation should be as neutral as possible for the economic activity, although it is recognised that accounting changes may result in economic effects. In the case of the changes for business combinations accounting in the USA, lobbying was so fierce that in order to achieve the abolition of accounting choice in M&A accounting, it forced the standard-setter to compromise and to change substantially some of its earlier proposals. Such fierce lobbying cast doubts about whether it was effectively possible to mitigate such economic effects, resulting in a possible impact of the accounting changes on the M&A activity. The occurrence of M&A in waves is yet to be fully theorised. Nevertheless, existing literature established relationships between M&A activity and some key economic and financial factors, and has provided several interesting theories and other meaningful contributions for this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting in Ancient Times: a Review of Classic References
    Accounting in Ancient Times: A Review of Classic References (*) Assist. Prof. Dr. Roberta Provasi University of Milan, Italy Prof. Dr. Shawki Farag The American University in Cairo, Egypt Abstract European accounting scholars have made significant contributions to the history of accounting. Some of these contributions were not translated into English and as such were not integrated in the evolving comprehensive coverage of the evolution of the accounting function. The purpose of this research is to review the works of those scholars in the context of the ancient history of civilizations. The research starts with the oldest texts known which are dated to the end of the fourth millennium BC (3200-3100). These were sequences of pictographic signs, which represent the antecedents of the direct cuneiform writing, engraved on clay tablets found in the monumental temple district dell’Eanna of the city of Uruk, in southern Iraq. The content of these textsare of a primarily administrative: lists of goods in and out of rations distributed to employees, etc.. The writing is in response to the demands of an administrative system, developed in a centralized economy with strong redistributive character.It was governed by an elite priesthood, (*) Bu bildiri, 19-22 Haziran 2013 tarihlerinde İstanbul’da organize edilen III. Balkanlar ve Ortadoğu Ülkeleri Muhasebe ve Muhasebe Tarihi Konferansı’nda sunulmuştur. 68 which was formed in southern Mesopotamiaas a resultofthe so-called “urban revolution”. The system of signsengraved on the tablets (about 1200) was already fully formed, and, as such, has no direct antecedents. In a broader sense, however, it represents the end of a long process of developing accounting systems and management of there serves,the beginnings of which date back to Neolithic period and there for eat the time of the first agriculturel villages.This acounting systems prehistoric werw based essentially on two instruments:accounting tokens and theseals.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Accounting; Some Perspectives on the Nigerian
    HISTORY OF ACCOUNTING: SOME PERSPECTIVES ON THE NIGERIAN SITUATION Loveday A. Nwanyanwu Abstract This paper discusses the history of accounting, it traces the methods adopted for recording business and financial activities from the ancient era through the periods of the Merchants of Venice in 1370, the Sumerian civilization of 5.000 years ago to the period of industrial revolution which sprang up in England between 1700 and 1785. Some developing countries including Nigeria are covered. It is discovered that modern bookkeeping developed in 1494. when Luca Pacioli, an Italian mathematician and friar published a treatise on double entry bookkeeping. Pacioli's work marked a turning point in the history of accountancy. It led to early education in accountancy and within the first century of its publication, the book was translated into five different languages. The growth in business and commercial activities between IS1'1 and 21st century has brought challenges to practitioners, scholars and philosophers in the field of accountancy. Contemporary thinking in accountancy is on mechanized procedure, adopting the use of computers for efficiency, accuracy, and timeliness in the production of information for business decisions. Introduction "Man's records, if any of his early undertakings are vague and often remote: a broken piece of cla\ \\ith inscriptions, a picture on the wall of a cave, or a partially destroyed skin. Interpreting these findings is frtquenlly as troublesome as discovering them in the first place (George Jr. 1972, P.I), Accounting is a branch of management science that is concerned with recording, analysing and interpreting financial transactions to users and other interested parties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Companion to Accounting History Historiography
    This article was downloaded by: 10.3.98.104 On: 24 Sep 2021 Access details: subscription number Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG, UK The Routledge Companion to Accounting History John Richard Edwards, Stephen P. Walker Historiography Publication details https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203871928.ch2 Christopher J. Napier Published online on: 21 Jul 2008 How to cite :- Christopher J. Napier. 21 Jul 2008, Historiography from: The Routledge Companion to Accounting History Routledge Accessed on: 24 Sep 2021 https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203871928.ch2 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR DOCUMENT Full terms and conditions of use: https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/legal-notices/terms This Document PDF may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproductions, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The publisher shall not be liable for an loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. Downloaded By: 10.3.98.104 At: 03:19 24 Sep 2021; For: 9780203871928, chapter2, 10.4324/9780203871928.ch2 First published 2009 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor and Francis Group, an informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting and Auditing History
    2 Accounting and Auditing History: Major Developments in England and the United States from Ancient Roots Through the Mid-Twentieth Century1 Howard Stettler Professor Emeritus, University of Kansas Summary The history of accounting and auditing, as inextricably entwined disciplines concerned with the communication of information about economic events affecting governmental or private entities, is traced from the beginning of recorded history to recent times. Both disciplines have developed as a response to emerging needs of the times, and both have facilitated the development of capital markets that have supplied the tremendous amounts of capital to satisfy the demand that was an outgrowth of the Industrial Revolution. Closely associated with the development of the two disciplines has been the emergence of the accounting profession, playing a key role in more recent times in advancing the state of the art in both professional practice and in the development of accounting and auditing standards. The following chronological synopsis of major developments in accounting and auditing constitutes the framework for the more extensive treatment the paper gives to the evolution of the two disciplines. The rationale underlying these developments is likewise considered. Major Developments Principal Causes Means of communication Communal activities Writing Need for a record of economic goods Accounting and auditing Accountability for tribute exacted by ruling authority Accounts of transactions with others Economic benefits of trading activity and
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 the History and Development Of
    CHAPTER 2 THE HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING 2.1 INTRODUCTION The previous chapter defined the research problem and stated the main hypothesis for the study, namely that management accountants may not be able to contribute fully to the strategic management process in the future, as the skills required and displayed by management accountants do not meet the needs of the changing business environment. This hypothesis also indicates a growing gap between current tertiary management accounting education and the future requirements of management accounting practice. A thorough understanding of the history and development of management accounting is required before the gap between education and practice can be investigated. Moreover, knowledge of the history of management accounting will facilitate an understanding of the future of this profession. As Plato said in 370 AD: … and thus, the tale (history) was preserved, and did not perish; and it may also preserve us, if we will listen to its warnings; in which case we shall pass prosperously across the river … and during the journey of a thousand years which we have described we may never cease to prosper (Plato 370AD) This chapter firstly highlights the difference as well as the interdependence between management accounting and financial accounting. The focus then shifts to historical developments in both these fields. Thirdly, the professional status of the management accountant is addressed as the study is relevant to practising management accountants. Finally, as the research for this study revolves around 10 the current status of management accounting in South Africa, its history and development -- although limited -- will be investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the History of Accounting
    STUDIES ‘IN THE HISTORY OF ACCOUNTING Studies in the History of Accounting Edited on behalf of The Association of University Teachers of Accounting and the American Accounting Association by A. C. LITTLETON, Ph.D. Emeritus Professor of Accounting, University of Illinois and B. S. YAMEY, B.Com. Reader in Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London 1956 RICHARD D. IRWIN, INC. HOMEWOOD, ILLINOIS Published in the United States of America (©) 1956 by Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Published in Great Britain by Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. of 2 & 3 Chancery Lane London — Law Publishers Printed in Great Britain by The Eastern Press Ltd. of London and Reading Preface MODERN accountancy differs from most branches of professional activity in that one of its major techniques—double-entry book- keeping—goes back as far as the fourteenth, perhaps even the thirteenth, century. This technique has proved to be serviceable and effective in the changing circumstances and with the changing business requirements of over five centuries. It has also had an intellectual interest sufficient to attract the active attention down the centuries of distinguished mathematicians and scientists such as Luca Pacioli, Simon Stevin, Charles Hutton and Augustus de Morgan. It is one of the objectives of this book to iJumine some aspects of the long history of double entry. Its early origins as revealed in surviving accounting records; some of its earliest expositors, their eminence and achievements in wider fields, and their treatises on accounting; the evolution of particular practices associated with double entry; the methods of teaching double entry and the emergence of theories of accounting; the spread of the practice—these are among the subjects considered in this collection of studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Luca Pacioli's Double-Entry System of Accounting
    Research Journal of Finance and Accounting www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1697 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2847 (Online) Vol.6, No.18, 2015 Luca Pacioli’s Double-Entry System of Accounting: A Critique. Adum Smith Ovunda Rivers State University of Science and Technology, P. M. B. 5080 Nkpolu Oroworukwo, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Abstract What we know today as double entry bookkeeping is traceable to a man called Luca Pacioli, the author of the world’s first printed book-keeping treatise. As the origin of all subsequent book-keeping treatises throughout Europe, Luca Pacioli’s book-keeping tract is not only the source of modern accounting, but also ensured that the medieval Venetian method itself survived into our times. However, this study is aimed at critically examining the emergence of the double entry system of accounting by reviewing what past scholars and researchers have done in relation to the subject matter. This is to say that a comprehensive review of accounting literature in relation to double entry system of accounting was carried out to do justice to this study. And it was gathered that double entry bookkeeping existed amongst the early Italian merchants before Pacioli came into the scene. But the practice prior to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries was rather crude because there were no formally documented principles to be followed. So the outburst of Pacioli in the fifteenth century recorded a landmark in the development of this all-embracing accounting system. The first ever published treatise about double entry bookkeeping was that of Luca Pacioli in his book titled “Summa de Arithmetica, Geometria, Proportioni et Proportionalita”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Accounting Through the History
    ISSN: 2278-3369 International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics Available online at www.managementjournal.info REVIEW ARTICLE The Development of Accounting through the History Mohamud Ambashe1, Hikmat A Alrawi2* 1Al-Itahad University, United Arab Emirate, UAE. 2Dept. Chair Finance and Accounting,City University College of Ajman, UAE. *Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper seeks to further advance our increasing knowledge of the history of accounting outside English-speaking countries in periods earlier than the modern era. It also contests de Ste. Croix's claim (1981) that "there seems to have been no really efficient method of accounting, by double or even single entry, before the thirteenth century". Analysis of medieval bookkeeping systems in Muslim society throws doubt on this assertion Keywords: Accounting history, Accounting development, Double entry accounting. Introduction Accounting is an information system that centralize the religion of Babylonia in the temple identifies records communicates the economic of Merodach at Babylon, and while he had thus events of an organization to interested users. The alienated the local priesthoods, the military party writing of accounting history is increasingly despised him on account of his antiquarian tastes. dominated by writers in English discussing He seemed to have left the defense of his kingdom private-sector accounting in English speaking to others, occupying himself with large chanks of countries of the 19th and 20th centuries the land covering more than 2000 hectors of land scope of accounting history is much wider than where he controlled and governed for period this . This paper seeks to further advance our between 2017- 2035 BC, the said land was used increasing knowledge of the history of accounting for agriculture by use of river Mesopotamia [2].
    [Show full text]