Congressional Directory CALIFORNIA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Directory CALIFORNIA 26 Congressional Directory CALIFORNIA Chief of Staff.—Daniel Weiss. FAX: 225–5609 Executive Assistant / Scheduler.—Courtney Rochelle. 1333 Willow Pass Road, Suite 203, Concord, CA 94520 ........................................... (925) 602–1880 District Director.—Barbara Johnson. 3220 Blume Drive, Suite 160, Richmond, CA 94806 ................................................. (510) 262–6500 Field Representative.—Latressa Alford. 375 G Street, Suite 1, Vallejo, CA 94592 ................................................................... (707) 645–1888 Field Representative.—Kathy Hoffman. Counties: CONTRA COSTA (part), SOLANO (part). CITIES AND TOWNSHIPS: Alomo, Antioch, Bay Point, Blackhawk, Clayton, Concord, El Cerrito, El Sobrante, Kensington, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hil, Richmond, San Pablo, and Walnut Creek. (2013), 722,847. ZIP Codes: 92526, 94506–07, 94509, 94517–24, 94527–30, 94549, 94553, 94556–57, 94563, 94565, 94595–98, 94708, 94801–08, 94820, 94850 *** TWELFTH DISTRICT NANCY PELOSI, Democrat, of San Francisco, CA; born in Baltimore, MD, March 26, 1940; daughter of the late Representative Thomas D’Alesandro, Jr., of MD; education: graduated, In- stitute of Notre Dame High School, 1958; B.A., Trinity College, Washington, DC (major, polit- ical science; minor, history), 1962; northern chair, California Democratic Party, 1977–81; state chair, California Democratic Party, 1981–83; chair, 1984 Democratic National Convention Host Committee; finance chair, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, 1985–86; member: Democratic National Committee; California Democratic Party Executive Committee; San Fran- cisco Library Commission; Board of Trustees, LSB Leakey Foundation; married: Paul F. Pelosi, 1963; children: Nancy Corinne, Christine, Jacqueline, Paul, Jr., and Alexandra; 8 grandchildren; elected by special election, June 2, 1987, to the 100th Congress to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Representative Sala Burton; reelected to each succeeding Congress; elected Demo- cratic Whip in the 107th Congress; Democratic Leader in the 108th and 109th Congresses; elected Speaker of the House in the 110th and 111th Congresses; elected Democratic Leader in the 112th Congress and 113th Congress. Office Listings http://www.house.gov/pelosi twitter: @nancypelosi 235 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 .................................... (202) 225–4965 Chief of Staff.—Catlin O’Neill. FAX: 225–8259 90 7th Street, Suite 2–800, San Francisco, CA 94103 ................................................ (415) 556–4862 District Director.—Dan Bernal. County: SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY (part). CITY: San Francisco. Population (2010), 702,905. ZIP Codes: 94014, 94102–05, 94107–12, 94114–18, 94121–24, 94127, 94129–34, 94158, 94164 *** THIRTEENTH DISTRICT BARBARA LEE, Democrat, of Oakland, CA; born in El Paso, TX, July 16, 1946; education: graduated, San Fernando High School; B.A., Mills College, 1973; MSW, University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley, 1975; congressional aide and public servant; senior advisor and chief of staff to Congressman Ronald V. Dellums in Washington, DC, and Oakland, CA, 1975–87; California State Assembly, 1990–96; California State Senate, 1996–98; Assembly committees: Housing and Land Use; Appropriations; Business and Professions; Industrial Relations; Judiciary; Rev- enue and Taxation; board member, California State Coastal Conservancy, District Export Coun- cil, and California Defense Conversion Council; committees: Appropriations; Budget; elected to the 105th Congress on April 7, 1998, by special election, to fill the remaining term of retiring Representative Ronald V. Dellums; reelected to each succeeding Congress. Office Listings http://lee.house.gov twitter: @repbarbaralee 2267 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 ................................. (202) 225–2661 CALIFORNIA 113th Congress 27 Chief of Staff.—Julie Nickson. FAX: 225–9817 Scheduler.—Tatyana Kalinga. Communications Director.—Carrie E. Adams. Legislative Director.—Jirair Ratevosian. 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1000–N, Oakland, CA 94612 ................................................ (510) 763–0370 Counties: ALAMEDA COUNTY. CITIES: Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Kensington, Piedmont. OAKLAND COUNTY (part). Population (2010), 691,592. ZIP Codes: 94501–02, 94577–79, 94601–15, 94617–94621, 94623–27, 94643, 94649, 94660–62, 94666, 94701–10, 94712, 94720 *** FOURTEENTH DISTRICT JACKIE SPEIER, Democrat, of Hillsborough, CA; born in San Francisco, CA, May 14, 1950; education: B.A., University of California at Davis; J.D., University of California, Hastings College of the Law, 1976; legislative council, Congressman Leo J. Ryan; member, San Mateo County Board of Supervisors; member, California State Assembly; senator, California State Senate; married: Barry Dennis; two children: Jackson Sierra and Stephanie Sierra; committees: Armed Services; Oversight and Government Reform; elected in a special election, April 8, 2008, to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Representative Thomas P. Lantos; elected to the 111th Congress on November 4, 2008; reelected to each succeeding Congress. Office Listings http://speier.house.gov https://www.facebook.com/jackiespeier twitter: @repspeier http://www.youtube.com/user/jackiespeierCA12 211 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 .................................... (202) 225–3531 Chief of Staff.—Cookab Hashemi. FAX: 226–4183 Legislative Director.—Erin Ryan. 155 Bovet Road, Suite 780, San Mateo, CA 94402 .................................................... (650) 342–0300 District Representative.—Brian Perkins. FAX: 375–8270 Counties: SAN MATEO COUNTY (part). CITIES: Belmont, Brisbane, Burlingame, Colma, Daly City, East Palo Alto, Foster City, Half Moon Bay, Hillsborough, Menlo Park, Millbrae, Montara, Moss Beach, Pacifica, Redwood City, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Gregorio, San Mateo, South San Francisco, and Woodside. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY (part). CITIES; San Francisco. Population (2012), 726,958. ZIP Codes: 94002, 94005, 94010–11, 94013–15, 94019, 94025, 94030, 94038, 94044, 94061–66, 94070, 94074, 94080, 94083, 94099, 94112, 94116–17, 94127–28, 94131–32, 94134, 94143, 94303, 94401–04, 94497 *** FIFTEENTH DISTRICT ERIC SWALWELL, Democratic, of Dublin, CA; born in Sac City, IA, November 16, 1980; education: graduated, Dublin High School, Dublin, CA, 1999; B.A., University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, 2003; J.D., University of Maryland School of Law, Baltimore, MD, 2006; professional: former city councilman at City of Dublin City Council; former Deputy District Attorney at Alameda County District Attorney’s Office; Planning Commissioner at City of Dublin; Heritage & Cultural Arts Commissioner at City of Dublin; law clerk at Alameda County District Attorney’s Office; commission: Tom Lantos Human Rights; caucuses: Pro-Choice; Ad Hoc Committee for Irish Affairs; Anti-Bullying; Congressional Asian Pacific America; Congressional Dyslexia; Cyber Security; Democratic Whip’s Task Force on Poverty and Opportunity; Diabetes; Friends of Ireland; High Tech; India; International Religious Free- dom; Internet; LGBT Equality; Ports; Science and Labs; Sikh; Soccer; Victims’ Rights; Wine; committees: Homeland Security; Science, Space, and Technology; elected to the 113th Congress on November 6, 2012. Office Listings http://www.swalwell.house.gov twitter: @repswalwell 501 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 .................................... (202) 225–5065 Chief of Staff.—Ricky Le. FAX: 226–3805 5075 Hopyard Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588 ............................................................... (925) 460–5100 1260 B Street, Suite 150, Hayward, CA 94541 ........................................................... (510) 370–3322.
Recommended publications
  • New Congress
    Elected Officials for 117th Congress, 1st session Green = new; Yellow = seat changed party; AL = At large (single district) Uncalled races are highlighted in red and will be updated as results are finalized ALABAMA Sen. Alex Padilla (appt’d) D-CA NEW Sen. Tommy Tuberville R-AL NEW Doug LaMalfa (R-CA-01) Re-elected Sen Richard Shelby R-AL Incumbent Jared Huffman (D-CA-02) Re-elected Jerry Carl (R-AL-01) NEW John Garamendi (D-CA-03) Re-elected Barry Moore (R-AL-02) NEW Tom McClintock (R-CA-04) Re-elected Mike Rogers (R-AL-03) Re-elected Mike Thompson (D-CA-05) Re-elected Robert Aderholt (R-AL-04) Re-elected Doris Matsui (D-CA-06) Re-elected Mo Brooks (R-AL-05) Re-elected Ami Bera (D-CA-07) Re-elected Gary Palmer (R-AL-06) Re-elected Jay Obernolte (R-CA-08) NEW Terri Sewell (D-AL-07) Re-elected Jerry McNerney (D-CA-09) Re-elected Josh Harder (D-CA-10) Re-elected ALASKA Mark DeSaulnier (D-CA-11) Re-elected Sen. Lisa Murkowski R-AK Incumbent Nancy Pelosi (D-CA-12) Re-elected Sen. Dan Sullivan R-AK Re-elected Barbara Lee (D-CA-13) Re-elected Don Young (R-AK-AL) Re-elected Jackie Speier (D-CA-14) Re-elected Eric Swalwell (D-CA-15) Re-elected ARIZONA Jim Costa (D-CA-16) Re-elected Sen. Mark Kelly D-AZ NEW Ro Khanna (D-CA-17) Re-elected Sen. Krysten Sinema D-AZ Incumbent Anna Eshoo (D-CA-18) Re-elected Tom O’Halleran (D-AZ-01) Re-elected Zoe Lofgren (D-CA-19) Re-elected Ann Kirkpatrick (D-AZ-02) Re-elected Jimmy Panetta (D-CA-20) Re-elected Raul Grijalva (D-AZ-03) Re-elected David Valadao (*prev served) (R-CA-21) NEW* Paul Gosar (R-AZ-04) Re-elected Devin Nunes (R-CA-22) Re-elected Andy Biggs (R-AZ-05) Re-elected Kevin McCarthy (R-CA-23) Re-elected Dave Schweikert (R-AZ-06) Re-elected Salud Carbajal (D-CA-24) Re-elected Ruben Gallego (D-AZ-07) Re-elected Mike Garcia (R-CA-25) Re-elected Debbie Lesko (R-AZ-08) Re-elected Julia Brownley (D-CA-26) Re-elected Greg Stanton (D-AZ-09) Re-elected Judy Chu (D-CA-27) Re-elected Adam Schiff (D-CA-28) Re-elected ARKANSAS Tony Cardenas (D-CA-29) Re-elected Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • August 10, 2021 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi the Honorable Steny
    August 10, 2021 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Steny Hoyer Speaker Majority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Speaker Pelosi and Leader Hoyer, As we advance legislation to rebuild and renew America’s infrastructure, we encourage you to continue your commitment to combating the climate crisis by including critical clean energy, energy efficiency, and clean transportation tax incentives in the upcoming infrastructure package. These incentives will play a critical role in America’s economic recovery, alleviate some of the pollution impacts that have been borne by disadvantaged communities, and help the country build back better and cleaner. The clean energy sector was projected to add 175,000 jobs in 2020 but the COVID-19 pandemic upended the industry and roughly 300,000 clean energy workers were still out of work in the beginning of 2021.1 Clean energy, energy efficiency, and clean transportation tax incentives are an important part of bringing these workers back. It is critical that these policies support strong labor standards and domestic manufacturing. The importance of clean energy tax policy is made even more apparent and urgent with record- high temperatures in the Pacific Northwest, unprecedented drought across the West, and the impacts of tropical storms felt up and down the East Coast. We ask that the infrastructure package prioritize inclusion of a stable, predictable, and long-term tax platform that: Provides long-term extensions and expansions to the Production Tax Credit and Investment Tax Credit to meet President Biden’s goal of a carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035; Extends and modernizes tax incentives for commercial and residential energy efficiency improvements and residential electrification; Extends and modifies incentives for clean transportation options and alternative fuel infrastructure; and Supports domestic clean energy, energy efficiency, and clean transportation manufacturing.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Election Results Coastal Commission Legislative Report
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA—NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105- 2219 VOICE (415) 904- 5200 FAX (415) 904- 5400 TDD (415) 597-5885 W-19a LEGISLATIVE REPORT 2012 ELECTION—CALIFORNIA COASTAL DISTRICTS DATE: January 9, 2013 TO: California Coastal Commission and Interested Public Members FROM: Charles Lester, Executive Director Sarah Christie, Legislative Director Michelle Jesperson, Federal Programs Manager RE: 2012 Election Results in Coastal Districts This memo describes the results of the 2012 elections in California’s coastal districts. The November 2012 General Election in California was the first statewide election to feel the full effect of two significant new electoral policies. The first of these, the “Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act,” was approved by voters in 2010 (Proposition 14). Under the new system, all legislative, congressional and constitutional office candidates now appear on the same primary ballot, regardless of party affiliation. The two candidates receiving the most votes in the Primary advance to the General Election, regardless of party affiliation. The June 2012 primary was the first time voters utilized the new system, and the result was numerous intra-party competitions in the November election as described below. The other significant new factor in this election was the newly drawn political districts. The boundaries of legislative and congressional seats were redrawn last year as part of the decennial redistricting process, whereby voting districts are reconfigured based on updated U.S. Census population data. Until 2011, these maps have been redrawn by the majority party in the Legislature, with an emphasis on party registration.
    [Show full text]
  • April 23, 2019 April Omni B Survey, Data for Progress Items
    To: Data for Progress From: YouGov Blue Date: April 23, 2019 April Omni B survey, Data for Progress Items [primaryvote] Next year, there will be a presidential $state_election_text in [state] to select nominees for president for the Democratic and Republican parties. Will you... <1> Definitely [vote or participate] <2> Probably [vote or participate] <3> Maybe [vote or participate] <4> Probably not [vote or participate] <5> Definitely not [vote or participate] [partyvote] And if you were to [vote or participate], would you [vote or participate] in the... <1> Democratic [primary or caucus] <2> Republican [primary or caucus] <3 fixed> Not sure [CHOICE20] Thinking about the 2020 Democratic presidential [primary or caucus] in your state, which candidate or candidates are you considering voting for? Select all that apply. <1> Joe Biden <2> Bernie Sanders <3> Kamala Harris <4> Beto O’Rourke <5> Cory Booker <6> Amy Klobuchar <7> Elizabeth Warren <8> John Hickenlooper <9> Kirsten Gillibrand <10> John Delaney <11> Julián Castro <12> Stacey Abrams <13> Tammy Baldwin <14> Bill DeBlasio <15> Tulsi Gabbard <16> Pete Buttigieg <17> Jay Inslee <18> Tim Ryan <19> Seth Moulton <20> Eric Swalwell <21> Andrew Yang <22> Marianne Williamson <23> Mike Gravel <24> Steve Bullock <25> Michael Bennet <26> Wayne Messam <27 fixed> None of these [RANK20] And of those candidates, please ranK them from the candidate you most prefer to the candidate you would least prefer. <1 (if selected in CHOICE20)> Joe Biden <2 (if selected in CHOICE20)> > Bernie Sanders <3 (if selected
    [Show full text]
  • Schmuhl Enters Indem Chair Race “Jan
    V26, N24 Thursday, Feb. 11, 2021 Schmuhl enters INDem chair race “Jan. 6 really affected Forming a ticket me,” said Schmuhl, who has run campaigns for with Myra Eldridge, Joe Donnelly and Shelli Yoder. “The presidency Schmuhl has backing of Joe Biden is exciting. of Joe Donnelly The leadership of the DNC under Jaime Har- By BRIAN A. HOWEY rison, the former state INDIANAPOLIS – Less than a party chair from South year after running Pete Buttigieg’s mete- Carolina and a person oric $100 million presidential campaign I know, is also exciting. and three months after he appeared to Some of those bigger pass on a run pieces came together. for Indiana I also heard from a lot Democratic of Democrats from all Party chair, over the state who were Mike Schmuhl urging me to reconsider. officially kicked And I did.” off that cam- Schmuhl will face paign, running in tandem with off with long-time party Marion County Clerk Myra Eldridge. operative Trish Whitcomb, who told HPI Wednesday morn- Schmuhl told Howey Politics Indiana that the ing, “I continue to get people reaching out to me. I’m glad Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol and outreach from that we have such talented people who want to be Demo- scores of Hoosier Democrats convinced him to reconsider. Continued on page 3 The mob & Mike Pence By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – For those of us in Indiana who know Mike Pence, Wednesday’s video timeline was ab- solutely chilling. It is by chance that he survived the Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden 48, Trump 44 in Texas, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Democrats Say 2-1 O’Rourke Should Challenge Cornyn
    Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director (203) 535-6203 Rubenstein Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JUNE 5, 2019 BIDEN 48, TRUMP 44 IN TEXAS, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; DEMOCRATS SAY 2-1 O’ROURKE SHOULD CHALLENGE CORNYN President Donald Trump is locked in too-close-to-call races with any one of seven top Democratic challengers in the 2020 presidential race in Texas, where former Vice President Joseph Biden has 48 percent to President Trump with 44 percent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. Other matchups by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University Poll show: President Trump at 46 percent to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 45 percent; Trump at 47 percent to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders at 44 percent; Trump at 48 percent to former U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke with 45 percent; Trump with 46 percent to South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s 44 percent; Trump at 47 percent to California Sen. Kamala Harris at 43 percent; Trump with 46 percent and former San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro at 43 percent. In the Trump-Biden matchup, women back Biden 54 – 39 percent as men back Trump 50 – 42 percent. White voters back Trump 60 – 33 percent. Biden leads 86 – 7 percent among black voters and 59 – 33 percent among Hispanic voters. Republicans back Trump 90 – 8 percent. Biden leads 94 – 4 percent among Democrats and 55 – 33 percent among independent voters. “The numbers are good for Vice President Joseph Biden who dominates the field in a Democratic primary and has the best showing in a head-to-head match-up against President Donald Trump,” said Peter A.
    [Show full text]
  • State Delegations
    STATE DELEGATIONS Number before names designates Congressional district. Senate Republicans in roman; Senate Democrats in italic; Senate Independents in SMALL CAPS; House Democrats in roman; House Republicans in italic; House Libertarians in SMALL CAPS; Resident Commissioner and Delegates in boldface. ALABAMA SENATORS 3. Mike Rogers Richard C. Shelby 4. Robert B. Aderholt Doug Jones 5. Mo Brooks REPRESENTATIVES 6. Gary J. Palmer [Democrat 1, Republicans 6] 7. Terri A. Sewell 1. Bradley Byrne 2. Martha Roby ALASKA SENATORS REPRESENTATIVE Lisa Murkowski [Republican 1] Dan Sullivan At Large – Don Young ARIZONA SENATORS 3. Rau´l M. Grijalva Kyrsten Sinema 4. Paul A. Gosar Martha McSally 5. Andy Biggs REPRESENTATIVES 6. David Schweikert [Democrats 5, Republicans 4] 7. Ruben Gallego 1. Tom O’Halleran 8. Debbie Lesko 2. Ann Kirkpatrick 9. Greg Stanton ARKANSAS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES John Boozman [Republicans 4] Tom Cotton 1. Eric A. ‘‘Rick’’ Crawford 2. J. French Hill 3. Steve Womack 4. Bruce Westerman CALIFORNIA SENATORS 1. Doug LaMalfa Dianne Feinstein 2. Jared Huffman Kamala D. Harris 3. John Garamendi 4. Tom McClintock REPRESENTATIVES 5. Mike Thompson [Democrats 45, Republicans 7, 6. Doris O. Matsui Vacant 1] 7. Ami Bera 309 310 Congressional Directory 8. Paul Cook 31. Pete Aguilar 9. Jerry McNerney 32. Grace F. Napolitano 10. Josh Harder 33. Ted Lieu 11. Mark DeSaulnier 34. Jimmy Gomez 12. Nancy Pelosi 35. Norma J. Torres 13. Barbara Lee 36. Raul Ruiz 14. Jackie Speier 37. Karen Bass 15. Eric Swalwell 38. Linda T. Sa´nchez 16. Jim Costa 39. Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. 17. Ro Khanna 40. Lucille Roybal-Allard 18.
    [Show full text]
  • July 31, 2020
    July 31, 2020 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Mitch McConnell Speaker of the House Majority Leader United States House of Representatives United States Senate H-232, U.S. Capitol S-230, U.S. Capitol Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Kevin McCarthy The Honorable Charles Schumer Minority Leader Minority Leader United States House of Representatives United States Senate H-204, U.S. Capitol S-220, U.S. Capitol Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Speaker Pelosi, Leader McCarthy, Majority Leader McConnell and Minority Leader Schumer: As our country continues to experience a surge in gun sales correlated with the COVID-19 pandemic, it is increasingly evident that Congress must take action to ensure the integrity of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) and prevent firearms from getting into the hands of dangerous individuals. To do this, we urge the inclusion of the bicameral NICS Data Integrity Act in the next COVID-19 response package. While federal law allows a gun to be sold at a dealer’s discretion if an initiated background check has not been completed within three days, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) continues to investigate these open cases afterward. Should FBI determine through such investigation that an attempted purchaser is prohibited, these “delayed denials” are referred to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to retrieve transferred guns. However, FBI regulation requires NICS to purge incomplete firearm background checks from its systems if a final determination has not been made within 88 days. In 2018 alone, delayed background checks resulted in 3,960 weapons being sold to individuals legally prohibited from obtaining them.
    [Show full text]
  • August 5, 2020 Dr. Michael Drake, President University of California
    August 5, 2020 Dr. Michael Drake, President University of California Office of the President University of California 1111 Franklin St., 12th floor Oakland, CA 94607 [email protected] University of California Board of Regents Office of the Secretary and Chief of Staff to the Regents 1111 Franklin St., 12th floor Oakland, CA 94607 [email protected] Via email Re: Affiliations that Impose Religious Restrictions on UC Health Care Dear President Drake and Board of Regents: As members of the California congressional delegation, we have a deep commitment to protecting and advancing access to evidence-based health care for all, both in our state and around the nation. It is for this reason that we write to express our serious concerns over the University of California’s affiliations that impose religious restrictions on UC providers, students, and patients, limiting the kind of medically necessary care they can provide and receive. Restricted services include LGBTQ-inclusive care, abortion care, miscarriage management, tubal ligation, and contraception. The consequences of denying this care are serious and can even be life-threatening. Many of us were outspoken in our strong opposition to the Trump administration’s Refusal of Care Rule. This dangerous, discriminatory regulation was designed to allow health care institutions and providers to deny patients information and treatment based on personal religious or moral beliefs. Its most profound impacts would be in further limiting access to reproductive health care – disproportionately for
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Members by State
    OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS • OCTOBER 1, 2021 Compiled by CHERYL L. JOHNSON, Clerk of the House of Representatives https://clerk.house.gov Democrats in roman (220); Republicans in italic (212); vacancies (3) FL20, OH11, OH15; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member's district. ALABAMA 1 Jerry L. Carl ................................................ Mobile 2 Barry Moore ................................................. Enterprise 3 Mike Rogers ................................................. Anniston 4 Robert B. Aderholt ....................................... Haleyville 5 Mo Brooks .................................................... Huntsville 6 Gary J. Palmer ............................................ Hoover 7 Terri A. Sewell ............................................. Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young .................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Tom O'Halleran ........................................... Sedona 2 Ann Kirkpatrick .......................................... Tucson 3 Raúl M. Grijalva .......................................... Tucson 4 Paul A. Gosar ............................................... Prescott 5 Andy Biggs ................................................... Gilbert 6 David Schweikert ........................................ Fountain Hills 7 Ruben Gallego ............................................. Phoenix 8 Debbie Lesko ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • May 27, 2021 the Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker United States
    May 27, 2021 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker Republican Leader United States House of Representatives United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Speaker Pelosi and Leader McCarthy: We write to respectfully urge you to quickly replenish the Restaurants Revitalization Fund (RRF) program to appropriate funding levels to meet current demand. On May 26th Administrator Isabel Guzman of the Small Business Administration (SBA) appeared in a full House Small Business Committee hearing. She testified that as of May 24th, the date the RRF program application portal closed, the RRF had received more than 362,000 applications – with a total of $75 billion in funding requested. As of May 18th, the SBA reported that so far nearly 38,000 applicants have been approved for more than $6 billion. We commend the prior work of the House to make the RRF program a reality with an allocation of $28.6 billion. However, this program is in extremely high-demand and at current funding levels the SBA will not be able to assist a large portion of the applicants. We urge you to work together with House Small Business Committee leadership and the SBA to bring a bill to the floor that would allocate funds so every eligible applicant can receive assistance. Our economy is still emerging from the immense damage of the COVID-19 crisis and our hardest hit small businesses, such as restaurants, bars, and food trucks, are still navigating the impacts of over a year of lockdown orders and limits to capacity among other health requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Political Engagement Policy, Oversight, and Disclosure
    U.S. Political Engagement Policy, Oversight, and Disclosure April 2021 Policy Introduction Salesforce’s Government Affairs and Public Policy team works with governments and other stakeholders around the world on issues that impact the lives of our employees, our customers and our company, guided by our four core values: trust, customer success, innovation, and equality. Salesforce’s Government Affairs and Public Policy team is nonpartisan in our work, and we support policies, candidates, and eligible organizations of any party who share our priorities. Salesforce is transparent, publicly disclosing all contributions in the U.S. in reports filed with the Federal Election Commission and with various state campaign finance commissions. Salesforce also participates in a variety of industry organizations, coalitions, and trade associations to advance our public policy interests and business goals. We review these memberships on an ongoing basis. We are committed to complying with all laws, rules and regulations relevant to our political activity. Contribution Eligibility Salesforce is nonpartisan. We support candidates and eligible organizations of any party who share our priorities, even if we don’t agree on every issue. All political contributions are made to promote the interests of the Company, without regard for the private political preferences of individual employees. The Company does not use corporate funds or resources to support federal candidates and exclusively uses the Salesforce.com Inc Political Action Committee, as required by federal law. Where permissible by law, we contribute to state and local candidates and ballot measures through corporate expenditures. We also make corporate expenditures to support our membership in trade associations and contribute to other tax-exempt organizations, which may be used for political purposes.
    [Show full text]