ED034800.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
:rT DOCUMENT RESUME ED 034 800 TE 500 483 AUTHOR Nardin, James T. TITLE Modern Criticism and the Closet Drama Approach. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Champaign, Ill. PUP DATE May 65 NOTE 7p.; Paper read at the National Council of Teachers of English Convention, Cleveland, Ohio, November, 1964 JOURNAL CIT College English; v26 n8 p591-597 May 1965 7DRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-50.25 HC-$0.45 DESCRIPTORS Acting, *College Students, Creative Dramatics, Creative Reading, Directed Reading Activity, Discussion Groups, *Drama, Dramatics, *Educational Objectives, *English Instruction, Group Reading, Imagination, *Literary Analysis, Literary Criticism, Literary Genres, Literature Appreciation, Reading Development, Teaching Methods, Teaching Techniques, Theoretical Criticism ABSTRACT Modern drama criticism is rebuked for taking the "closet drama approach" which reduces the theater to yet another type of philosophical and content-oriented literary genre. Group participation and discussion are suggested as means by which the student is encouraged to stage an imaginary performance leading to intelligibility and appreciation of the theatrical nature of drama. Special problems encountered by students in reading the drama are examined. (RL) fromCollege English, May,1965 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION 8 WELFARE OFFICE Of EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROMTHE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS Of VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OfEDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY. Modern Criticism and theCloset Drama Approach JAMEST. NARDIN IN THE YEARS that I've been teachingas retreatment ofearlier material. When drama, the commonest and most disheart-I was an undergraduate, I had a course ening comment I've met with regularityin Shakespeare, and because I took Greek is "I can't read a play." This comes fromand Latin, I also read some classical dra- my students; it comesfrom my friends;ma. But Greek drama was anexercise in it comes from my colleagues on occasion.translation; it was not the study of a And a good bit of the reason for thisplay. The Shakespeare professor lectured failure can be attributed to the kind ofon sources and indicated inthe early criticism we have been faced with in theplays the characters to be developed dramaa criticism which in a sense apolo-more fully later and thenreminded us in gizes for and tries to explain away thethe later plays that we had seen earlier drama, or at least to treat it as if it wereViolas, Launcelots, and Iagos. So he something else more respectable. devoted five lectures to Two Gentlemen of Verona and a total of three to Hamlet, This is not strange. Drama has beenLear, Macbeth, Othello, and Antony and suspect in the classroom for a long time, largely, I fear, because it is popular. We Cleopatra. who teach tend to mistrust literature Then along came Brooks and Warren people like. Indeed, I doubt that dramawith their new approach to teaching po- would ever have made it into the class-etry and fiction, and this newapproach room and the learned journa!s if it hadwas extended to the drama.More plays not been for Shakespeare. His poeticwere introduced intothe classroom, and genius was so great that he could not bethat was all to the good. Also, the time ignored, and after all, the main body ofin class was devoted largely to the text tihis work was in dramatic form. So theof the play instead of merely to Holins- play had to be reckoned with. hed or Plutarch and theadaptation But it could be explained away asShakespeare made of these sources. something elseas a philosophical discus- But the orientation of that approach to 14.sion, as imaginative poetry, as imagery,the drama text was still fundamentally the approach to the poem, an approach Modern drama is the special field of Mr.to a piece of literature designed tobe Nardin, professor of English at Louisiana Stateread by one person alone, to be analyzed University. This paper was read at the NCTE Convention session on Teaching Drama, inclosely in terms of imagery and philo- November, 1964. sophical content. It simply ignores the J1 ..earuage 592 COLLEGE ENGLISH elements that make a play distinctive. It there, but he often talks as if this were turns all plays into closet drama. And to trueas if, because he wrote for the make Hamlet or Hedda Gabler or Oedi- theater, Shakespeare were restricted by .-apacities of the ordinary theater-goer pus Rex closet drama is disastrous both (as conjectured by a twentieth-century critically and pedagogically. scholar)....2 After all, most of us did not get in- terested in closet drama to begin with, These two passages seem to me to lay if, indeed, we ever got interested in it.bare the heart of the problem of trying We saw plays; we acted in them. Onlyto make use of modern criticism in teach- after considerable experience with whating drama. Though both imply that dra- plays looked like and sounded like werematic necessity and dramatic elements are we able to read them and approximate ainvolved, the idea of concentrating on theatrical experience in our imaginations.what comes over in a theater before one But most modern criticism would leadexplores any additionalpossibilityis us away from the theatrical phase ofpassed over by calling the "first-night" the drama and take it directly into theapproach a fallacy and referring to those of us who like to begin there as "victims" closet for careful scrutiny. of it. The emphasis on "reading" a play In This Great Stage (1947), his bookas it appears in these passages suggests on King Lear, Robert B. Heilman (and itthat a reading and a viewing are the same is his text Understanding Drama whichthing. They are not. has been perhaps as influential as any Let me turn back briefly to these pas- single work on the direction recentsages and to what seems to be fundamen- teaching of the drama has taken) indi-tally wrong in their approach. The ref- cates this prejudice against the theatrical: erence to the play as a philosophical es- But it seems safer to assume, as a work-say seems to me like the statement of ing hypothesis, that, when there is re-teachersand I have heard manywho peated speculation upon nature, the playstart to deal with a short story by saying is to that extent an essay upon nature"Now the story is not important." They an essay necessarily broken up into partscut off what gets the reader interested in which are apportioned according to, and finding out what more may be offered. probably modified by, dramatic neces-If the author chooses to write a story, he sity does so because he thinks he can embody A decade later, in Magic in the Web, hehis idea more forcefully in story form or is more strongly opposed to any but thebecause he thinks stories make more t closet study of the drama as poem: money than philosophical essays. In either The printed play is somewhat like theevent, itis important and a necessary symphonic score which the music critic,starting point. imagining the performance, may study Similarly, if we tell the student that rigorously to see how it is "composed."Oedipus and Lear are interesting because All this is hardly a new and bright idea,they both deal with a similar theme of but it seems necessary to say it to counterparadoxical blindness and sight and that an argument that keeps popping upthethe play as play is not important, we are Fallacy of the First Night or the Fallacydenying the very elements which make of the Single Reading. The victim of this fallacy can hardly believe that what thethem distinctive and exciting worksthat auditor would not get from the perform-they are plays which embody ideas in a ance, or the reader from such a readingform designed to reach an audience in as he would accord to a relativelya theater and move that audience, that straight-forward work of prose, is notmuch of what moves us depends on what s This Great Stage, p. 11. s Magic in the Web (1956), p. 13. ti MODERN CRITICISM AND THE CLOSET DRAMA APPROACH 593 we see and hear, and that the failure toprevious close study of the text are of consider these theatrical elements is tono great significance to the student learn- make these plays simply one more pair ofing to overcome his inability to "read long poems for private reading in thea play." closet. Professor Heilman's other statement So let us turn to what the student which I have quoted about the play'sfinds his greatest problems in reading a being a symphonic score for study andplay. The novel is designed to be read; analysis one finds echoed in many ofthe poem is designed to be read. Both the most recent texts of the drama. Butcan be taken in in solitude. The play the statement appears again to me tois designed to be seen and heard by a go at the play from the wrong end. Letgroup of people assembled in a the- me repeat his phrase again"the printedater (or more recently before a TV set). play is somewhat like a symphonic scoreWhen the student picks up a play with which the music critic, imagining thespeeches and character names and little performance, may study rigorously toelse, he finds himself far more on his own see how itis 'composed.' " True, butthat he is in the novel, where the author there is admittedly no purpose to anal-is in general more explicit in telling him ysis of a symphonic score if the readerwhat he is seeing and what he is hearing does not imagine the performance.