DOCSLIB.ORG

MPCA Air Quality Permits Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MPCA Air Quality Permits Guide MPCA Air Quality Permits Guide Part 1 Defining Your Facility Prepared by: Air Quality Staff Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 March 1994 Revised September 1998 Printed on paper containing at least 20 percent fibers from paper recycled from consumers. Part 1 Acknowledgments March 1994 version: Author: Barbara Conti Contributors: Lori Bartels Leo Raudys Dick Cordes Kathy Seeburger Bernadette Halverson Toni Stevens Julie Hendricks Mark Strange Mary Hoffman Phyllis Strong Barb Loida Neesha Wolf MPCA Air Quality Division Minnesota Office of the Attorney General Project Manager: Leo Raudys Editor: Valerie Williams, VKW Consulting Graphic Design and Layout: Dick Garrison, Garrison Design (March 1994 version only) Additional assistance provided Rust Environment & Infrastructure by: 1998 revision: Coordinator: Toni Volkmeier Contributors: Peggy Bartz Bonnie Nelson The MPCA would also like to thank the following individuals and organizations for provided advice and assistance during initial development of this document: MPCA Small Business Compliance Advisory Council William R. McMurtry, Honeywell, Inc. Tim Casey, HDR Engineering, Inc. Mike Medina, Unisys Karl DeWahl, Minnesota Technical Assistance Program Craig Moody, University of Minnesota Duane Dittberner, Unisys Mark Sytsma, Woodcraft Industries, Inc. James N. Friedman, Interpoll Laboratories, Inc. Mike Valentine, Braun Intertec Stephen F. Haselmann, Waldorf Corporation Lee Walz, DeZurik Elizabeth Henderson, Wenck Associates, Inc. Richard Svanda, Jostens Gary Kaziukewicz, Waldorf Corporation Paul Kramer, Rahr Malting Company Richard T. Kennealy, Jr., United Defense, L.P. Ahto Niemioja, Braun Intertec Allan Kremer, Hennepin Energy Resource Company Mary Sands, DPRA Incorporated Mary Kruger, Department of Trade and Economic Development Richard D. Lowe, American Engineering Testing, Inc. Gary J. Nierengarten, Frigidaire Company - Freezer Products Michael K. Vennewitz, Capsule Environmental Engineering, Inc. Bill Wall, ENSR Consulting and Engineering Table of Contents Preface To The Guide......................................................................................v Focus Of Part 1 .............................................................................................vii 1.0 What Is A Permit?....................................................................................1-1 2.0 What Air Pollutants Are Regulated By The MPCA?..............................2-1 2.1 Criteria pollutants................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) .......................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Other regulated pollutants ...................................................................................... 2-4 3.0 Steps For Completing A Permit Application .........................................3-1 4.0 How Is Your Facility Defined? ................................................................4-1 4.1 What are your emission points? ............................................................................. 4-1 4.2 What are your emission units? ............................................................................... 4-2 4.3 How should you describe your operations?............................................................ 4-3 5.0 What Is Potential To Emit (PTE)?...........................................................5-1 5.1 How do you calculate Potential to Emit (PTE)? .................................................... 5-1 5.1.1 What references can you use to calculate PTE?......................................... 5-2 5.1.2 Examples of potential emissions calculations............................................ 5-3 5.1.3 What is the next step after calculating the PTE of your emission units? ... 5-8 5.1.4 What about fugitive emissions? ................................................................. 5-9 5.1.5 What if your PTE is below the thresholds?................................................ 5-10 5.2 Do you need any other emissions data? ................................................................. 5-11 5.2.1 What are your actual emissions?................................................................ 5-11 5.3 How can you limit your Potential to Emit (PTE)? ................................................. 5-12 5.3.1 What about your air pollution control equipment? .................................... 5-12 5.3.2 What if you do not want to be subject to federal regulations? ................... 5-12 5.3.2.1 What are acceptable options for synthetic minor limits? ............... 5-13 6.0 What Rules And Regulations Apply To You? ........................................6-1 6.1 What are the federal regulations?........................................................................... 6-1 6.1.1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).................................. 6-1 6.1.1.1 State Implementation Plan ............................................................. 6-2 6.1.2 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs)............................................................................... 6-2 6.1.3 New Source Review (NSR)........................................................................ 6-3 6.1.3.1 Does NSR apply to your facility?................................................... 6-4 6.1.3.2 What is required for NSR?............................................................. 6-5 6.1.4 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)............................................. 6-6 6.1.4.1 An example of an NSPS................................................................. 6-7 MPCA Air Quality Permits Guide Part 1: Defining Your Facility -- Revision 1, September 1998 Page i 6.1.5 Acid rain..................................................................................................... 6-7 6.1.6 Stratospheric ozone protection................................................................... 6-7 6.1.7 Compliance assurance monitoring ............................................................. 6-8 6.2 What are the Minnesota rules?............................................................................... 6-8 6.2.1 Air Quality permit rule............................................................................... 6-9 6.2.2 Environmental review program.................................................................. 6-9 6.2.3 Standards of performance for stationary sources ....................................... 6-10 6.2.4 Emission inventory and air quality emission fees ...................................... 6-10 6.2.5 Performance testing for emissions ............................................................. 6-11 7.0 How Do You Maintain Flexibility In Your Operations?.........................7-1 7.1 What is operational flexibility?.............................................................................. 7-1 7.1.1 Alternative operating scenarios.................................................................. 7-1 7.1.2 Emission trading......................................................................................... 7-2 8.0 What If You Have Confidential Material In An Application? ................8-1 9.0 What Is In A Complete Permit Application?..........................................9-1 9.1 Why is a "complete" application important?.......................................................... 9-1 9.2 When were complete permit applications due?...................................................... 9-2 9.3 What happens to your application at the MPCA? .................................................. 9-3 10.0 Case Study -- Blue Ox Woodworks........................................................10-1 10.1 History of Blue Ox Woodworks............................................................................. 10-1 10.2 Blue Ox Woodworks Emission Unit Information.................................................. 10-2 10.2.1 Boilers ........................................................................................................ 10-2 10.2.2 Milling operations ...................................................................................... 10-3 10.2.3 Painting operations..................................................................................... 10-6 10.2.4 Diesel generator.......................................................................................... 10-7 10.2.5 Fugitive dust emissions .............................................................................. 10-7 10.2.6 Insignificant activities ................................................................................ 10-7 10.3 Blue Ox Woodworks emission calculations........................................................... 10-7 10.3.1 Wood boiler #1 calculations....................................................................... 10-8 10.3.2 New boiler #2 calculations......................................................................... 10-9 10.3.3 Milling equipment calculations.................................................................. 10-11 10.3.4 Painting equipment calculations................................................................. 10-11 10.3.5 Diesel generator calculations...................................................................... 10-19 10.3.6 Summary of all potential to emit calculations...........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enagás' CH4 Emissions Reporting, Mitigation and Commitment
    Enagás’ CH4 emissions reporting, mitigation and commitment Initial condition Enagás is a midstream company. It is a leading natural gas infrastructure company in Spain and the Technical Manager of the Spanish gas system. The company's activities include the management, operation and maintenance of gas infrastructure. In Spain Enagás has approximately 12,000 km of gas pipelines, 19 compressor stations, 493 regulation and metering stations, and 3 underground storage facilities. It also owns 4 LNG regasification plants, and it is the main shareholder of other two. Traditionally, Enagás managed methane emissions predominantly from the safety requirements perspective. However, as energy efficiency and GHG emissions reduction have become strategic priorities for the company, emissions of methane, being a potent short-lived climate pollutant, came to the forefront. The most relevant aspects addressed by Enagás in its climate change management model are: public commitment and the setting of targets, emissions reduction and compensation measures, as well as reporting on performance and results, following TCFD1 recommendations. Since 2013, the company voluntarily started to annually calculate and verify its Carbon Footprint, which constitutes the base for its emission reduction strategy. Quantification of methane emissions is a part of that process, which is subject to an independent third-party verification in accordance with standard ISO 14064. Process: the role of leaks detection and repair Methane emissions account for approximately 20% of Enagás’ greenhouse gas emissions (scope 1 and 2). 70% of these are fugitive methane emissions while the remainder (30%) is primary caused by safety precautions, or by design of equipment (vents). Due to the relatively large share of fugitive emissions, in 2013 Enagás started to carry out leak detection and repair campaigns (LDAR).
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 2. Lesson 5. Noise Pollution
    ACOUSTICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Unit 2. Lesson 5. Noise Pollution Objectives: Upon completion of this unit, students will understand that noise pollution is more than loud noises. They will also learn what causes hearing damage and that animals, as well as humans, are subject to hearing loss. Vocabulary words: litter, pollution, loudness-related hearing loss, blast trauma What is Noise Pollution? Litter on the side of the road, is thought to be a sound so junk floating in the water, and intense that it could shatter smokes spewing into the glass, or crack plaster in rooms atmosphere from factory or on buildings. That is not so. smokestacks are obvious forms It can come from sources such of pollution. There are other as jet airplanes, constant types of pollution that are not droning of traffic, motorcycles, as obvious. Noise pollution is high-power equipment, or loud one form. What is noise music. pollution? It is defined as sounds, or noises, that are loud, annoying and harmful to the ear. Often, sound pollution How is Noise Pollution Harmful? Sound energy is transferred When sound reaches the through compressions and human ear, it causes structures rarefactions. to vibrate. Intense vibrations (Reference can rupture the eardrum, but lesson 1, if more often, loudness-related necessary.) hearing loss usually develops If the over time. When sound enters intensity is the ear, it is transferred to the very large, it can harm human brain as a nerve impulse. Each and animal ears, and do nerve is composed of tiny nerve damage to physical structures. fibers, surrounded by special fluid within the ear.
    [Show full text]
  • Epact Complementary Program Unconventional Resources Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
    EPAct Complementary Program Unconventional Resources Technical Advisory Committee Meeting Alexandra Hakala Shale Gas Technical Coordinator, NETL-ORD September 19, 2013 National Energy Technology Laboratory Tech Transfer to Date: www.edx.netl.doe.gov/ucr 31 Conference Presentations 7 Published Articles & Reports • Additional manuscripts undergoing internal and external peer review 2 Datasets released via EDX 2 Data-driven tool/app via EDX Complementary Program Portfolio – UCR Fugitive Emission Factors and Air Emissions – Fugitive Air Emissions Field Data (2011 to present) – Greenhouse Gas Life Cycle Methane Emission Factor Assessment (2011 to 2012 -- completed) Produced Water and Waste Management – Predicting Compositions and Volumes of Produced Water (2011 to present) – Evaluation of the Geochemical and Microbiological Composition of Shale Gas Produced Water and Solid Wastes (2011 to present) – Biogeochemical Factors that Affect the Composition of Produced Waters and the Utility of Geochemical Tracer Tools (2011 to present) Subsurface Fluid and Gas Migration – Integrated Field Monitoring – Gas/Fluid Migration (2011 to present) – Gas Flow from Shallow Gas Formations (2012 to present) – Approach for Assessing Spatial Trends & Potential Risks with UCR Systems (2011 to present) – Impacts of Shale Gas Development on Shallow Groundwater (2012 to present) – Subsurface Gas and Fluid Migration Assessment (2011 to 2012 -- completed) – Develop a Suite of Naturally Occurring Geochemical Tracer Tools that Verify the Sources of Fluids in Complex Geologic
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring the Acoustic Performance of Low- Noise Pavements
    Monitoring the acoustic performance of low- noise pavements Carlos Ribeiro Bruitparif, France. Fanny Mietlicki Bruitparif, France. Matthieu Sineau Bruitparif, France. Jérôme Lefebvre City of Paris, France. Kevin Ibtaten City of Paris, France. Summary In 2012, the City of Paris began an experiment on a 200 m section of the Paris ring road to test the use of low-noise pavement surfaces and their acoustic and mechanical durability over time, in a context of heavy road traffic. At the end of the HARMONICA project supported by the European LIFE project, Bruitparif maintained a permanent noise measurement station in order to monitor the acoustic efficiency of the pavement over several years. Similar follow-ups have recently been implemented by Bruitparif in the vicinity of dwellings near major road infrastructures crossing Ile- de-France territory, such as the A4 and A6 motorways. The operation of the permanent measurement stations will allow the acoustic performance of the new pavements to be monitored over time. Bruitparif is a partner in the European LIFE "COOL AND LOW NOISE ASPHALT" project led by the City of Paris. The aim of this project is to test three innovative asphalt pavement formulas to fight against noise pollution and global warming at three sites in Paris that are heavily exposed to road noise. Asphalt mixes combine sound, thermal and mechanical properties, in particular durability. 1. Introduction than 1.2 million vehicles with up to 270,000 vehicles per day in some places): Reducing noise generated by road traffic in urban x the publication by Bruitparif of the results of areas involves a combination of several actions.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does Science Tell Us About Fugitive Methane Emissions from Unconventional Gas?
    www.csiro.au Fugitive emissions from unconventional gas What the latest scientific research is telling us about fugitive methane emissions from unconventional gas. July 2019 What does science tell us about fugitive methane emissions from unconventional gas? This factsheet sets out what the KEY POINTS science tells us about methane • Fugitive emissions are losses, leaks and other releases of methane to the atmosphere that emission sources from coal seam gas are associated with industries producing natural gas, oil and coal. They also include CO2 (CSG) wells, pipelines, compressors emissions associated with flaring of excess gas to the atmosphere. and other infrastructure associated • In Australia, fugitive emissions from oil and gas with CSG production; and their production are estimated to account for about 6.0% of greenhouse gas emissions. importance in contributing to • To accurately measure fugitive emissions, natural background biological and geological warming of the earth’s climate. sources must be separated from human sources. CSIRO studies aim to separate these sources. • CSIRO has a range of research programs What is methane and where does it come from? underway in Queensland, New South Wales, Methane, a colourless, odourless, non-toxic gas, originates from Western Australia and the Northern Territory two sources: using measuring and monitoring techniques, life-cycle analysis methods and industry activity • the decomposition of organic matter, such as in lakes, rivers, data to provide accurate and comprehensive wetlands and soils, or estimates of natural and and fugitive emissions • from deep beneath the earth’s surface where gaseous methane in Australia. has formed geochemically under elevated temperature and • A recent CSIRO study on GHG emissions from pressure conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the Cardiovascular System: Part II –A Focus on Non-Air R Related Pollutants
    Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 29 (2019) 274–282 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tcm Ecology of the cardiovascular system: Part II –A focus on non-air R related pollutants ∗ J.F. Argacha, MD, PhD a, , T. Mizukami a, T. Bourdrel b, M-A Bind c a Cardiology Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, VUB, Belgium b Radiology Department, Imaging Medical Center Etoile-Neudorf, Strasbourg, France c Department of Statistics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Keywords: An integrated exposomic view of the relation between environment and cardiovascular health should Noise consider the effects of both air and non-air related environmental stressors. Cardiovascular impacts of Bisphenol ambient air temperature, indoor and outdoor air pollution were recently reviewed. We aim, in this second Pesticides part, to address the cardiovascular effects of noise, food pollutants, radiation, and some other emerging Dioxins Radiation environmental factors. Electromagnetic field Road traffic noise exposure is associated with increased risk of premature arteriosclerosis, coronary Endothelium artery disease, and stroke. Numerous studies report an increased prevalence of hypertension in people Oxidative stress exposed to noise, especially while sleeping. Sleep disturbances generated by nocturnal noise are followed Hypertension by a neuroendocrine stress response. Some oxidative and inflammatory endothelial reactions are observed Coronary artery disease during experimental session of noise exposure. Moreover, throughout the alimentation, the cardiovascular Stroke system is exposed to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) as dioxins or pesticides, and plastic associated chemicals (PACs), such as bisphenol A.
    [Show full text]
  • Air and Noise Pollution Abatement Services: an Examination of U.S
    U.S. International Trade Commission COMMISSIONERS Stephen Koplan, Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun, Vice Chairman Marcia E. Miller Jennifer A. Hillman Charlotte R. Lane Daniel R. Pearson Robert A. Rogowsky Director of Operations Karen Laney-Cummings Director of Industries Address all communications to Secretary to the Commission United States International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 U.S. International Trade Commission Washington, DC 20436 www.usitc.gov Air and Noise Pollution Abatement Services: An Examination of U.S. and Foreign Markets Investigation No. 332-461 Publication 3761 April 2005 This report was principally prepared by the Office of Industries Project Team Jennifer Baumert, Project Leader [email protected] Eric Forden, Deputy Project Leader [email protected] Judith Dean, Economist Staff assigned: William Chadwick, Lisa Ferens, David Ingersoll, Dennis Luther, Christopher Mapes, Erick Oh, Robert Randall, and Ben Randol Office of Operations Peg MacKnight With special assistance from: Lynette Gabourel and Cynthia Payne Primary Reviewers Alan Fox and Mark Paulson under the direction of Richard Brown, Chief Services and Investment Division ABSTRACT As requested by the United States Trade Representative (USTR), this report examines global markets for air and noise pollution abatement services and trade in these services markets for the purpose of providing information that would be useful in conducting trade negotiations and environmental reviews. The report indicates that demand for air and noise pollution abatement services is driven largely by government regulation and enforcement efforts, and to a lesser extent, by international treaty obligations, public sentiment, and private-sector financial resources. The majority of air pollution abatement services are reportedly delivered in conjunction with air pollution control equipment, with European, Japanese, and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Pollution Ocean 409, University of Washington
    MARINE POLLUTION OCEAN 409, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Syllabus for Spring 2022 Time, Location, Zoom, and Course Website M-W-F 11:30-12:20pm PST The course materials will be posted through UW Canvas. Course Overview Marine Pollution explores anthropogenic impacts on the oceans and marine organisms. Marine pollution occurs when harmful effects result from the entry into the ocean of chemicals, particles, industrial or residential waste, noise, light, or the spread of invasive organisms. In this course, students examine how scientific understanding of marine pollution informs environmental management, thereby linking science and society. Students will develop a detailed understanding of six maJor categories of anthropogenic impacts on marine systems. Each theme will be explored from a variety of angles including pollution source(s), mechanisms of action, delirious effects and mitigation thereof, management of the issue, and some likely futures for the issue/theme. Learning Goals Students successfully completing this course will be able to • Understand a set of core facts about anthropogenic change to the oceans, including key aspects of ocean acidification, deoxygenation, chemical pollution, and deleterious impacts on fish and plankton. • Be able to communicate the effects of marine pollution on global climate. • Develop or enhance skills in team work, inductive reasoning, interpretation of complex data, and the sharing of complex scientific data and interpretations with non-technical audiences. Instructor Contact Information and Office Hours Rick Keil Professor of Chemical Oceanography Ocean Sciences Building, Room 517 [email protected] Randie Bundy Professor of Chemical Oceanography Ocean Sciences Building, Room 411 [email protected] Randie and Rick’s office hours are for one hour immediately following class periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Fugitive Emissions Calculations
    Guidelines for Fugitive Emissions Calculations June 2003 Office of Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources South Coast Air Quality Management District TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 COMPONENT IDENTIFICATION AND SCREENING ILLUSTRATION 2 METHOD 1…AVERAGE EMISSION FACTORS 5 DISTRICT’S DEFAULT EMISSION FACTORS 6 METHOD 2…CORRELATION EQUATIONS 7 TABLE IV-3a : CAPCOA-REVISED 1995 EPA CORRELATION EQUATIONS AND FACTORS FOR REFINERIES AND MARKETING TERMINALS 10 METHOD 3…SCREENING VALUE RANGE 11 TABLE IV-2a : 1995 EPA PROTOCOL REFINERY SCREENING VALUE EMISSION FACTORS 14 TABLE IV-2b : 1995 EPA PROTOCOL MARKETING TERMINAL SCREENING VALUE EMISSION FACTORS 15 TABLE IV-2c : CAPCOA OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION SCREENING VALUE EMISSION FACTORS 16 SCREENING DATA REPORTING FILE FORMAT 17 EXAMPLE OF DATA FILE FORMAT 18 EXAMPLE OF SUMMARY REPORT OF EMISSIONS 19 EXAMPLE OF PROCESS UNITS AND CODES 19 SAMPLE OF AER FORM P1 20 SAMPLE OF AER FORM P1U 21 SAMPLE OF AER FORM R3 22 SAMPLE OF AER FORM T1 23 PREFACE The South Coast Air Quality Management District (District) Rule 301 (e) requires facilities operating under District permit to annually report their emissions from all equipment (permitted and non-permitted) to the District. This guidelines document represents a revision to the District’s “Guidelines for Fugitive Emission Calculations – Petroleum Industry”, dated June 1999 to reflect the latest amendments to Rule 1173. This guidelines document provides calculation methods for estimating fugitive emissions (component leaks) from the petroleum industry (i.e.,
    [Show full text]
  • Did Noise Pollution Really Improve During COVID-19? Evidence from Taiwan
    sustainability Communication Did Noise Pollution Really Improve during COVID-19? Evidence from Taiwan Rezzy Eko Caraka 1,2,3,* , Yusra Yusra 4, Toni Toharudin 5, Rung-Ching Chen 2,* , Mohammad Basyuni 6,* , Vilzati Juned 4, Prana Ugiana Gio 7 and Bens Pardamean 3,8 1 Faculty of Economics and Business, Campus UI Depok, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java 16426, Indonesia 2 Department of Information Management, College of Informatics, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 41349, Taiwan 3 Bioinformatics and Data Science Research Center, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia; [email protected] 4 Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE), Sabang, Banda Aceh 24415, Indonesia; [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (V.J.) 5 Department of Statistics, Padjadjaran University, West Java, Bandung 45363, Indonesia; [email protected] 6 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia 7 Department of Mathematics, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia; [email protected] 8 Computer Science Department, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.E.C.); [email protected] (R.-C.C.); [email protected] (M.B.) Abstract: Background and objectives: The impacts of COVID-19 are like two sides of one coin. During 2020, there were many research papers that proved our environmental and climate conditions were improving due to lockdown or large-scale restriction regulations. In contrast, the economic Citation: Caraka, R.E.; Yusra, Y.; conditions deteriorated due to disruption in industry business activities and most people stayed Toharudin, T.; Chen, R.-C.; Basyuni, at home and worked from home, which probably reduced the noise pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions, Activity Data, and Emission Factors of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases (F-Gases) in Germany 1995-2002
    Texte Emissions, Activity Data, 15 and Emission Factors of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases 05 (F-Gases) in Germany ISSN 0722-186X 1995-2002 TEXTE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH OF THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, NATURE CONSERVATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY Research Report 201 41 261/01 UBA-FB 000811/e Texte Emissions, Activity Data, and Emission Factors of 15 Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases (F-Gases) in Germany 05 1995-2002 ISSN 0722-186X Adaptation to the Requirements of International Reporting and Implementation of Data into the Centralised System of Emissions (ZSE) by Dr. Winfried Schwarz Öko-Recherche Büro für Umweltforschung und –beratung GmbH, Frankfurt/Main On behalf of the Federal Environmental Agency UMWELTBUNDESAMT This Publication is only available as Download under http://www.umweltbundesamt.de The publisher does not accept responsibility for the correctness, accuracy or completeness of the information, or for the observance of the private rights of third parties. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the official opinions. Publisher: Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt) P.O.B. 14 06 06844 Dessau Tel.: +49-340-2103-0 Telefax: +49-340-2103 2285 Internet: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de Edited by: Section III 1.4 Katja Schwaab Berlin, June 2005 Report Cover Sheet 1. Report No. 2. 3. UBA-FB 4. Report Title Emissions, Activity Data, and Emission Factors of Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases (F-Gases) in Germany 1995-2002. Adaptation to the Requirements of International Reporting und Implementation of Data into the Centralised System of Emissions (ZSE) (In German) 5. Authors, Family Names, First Names 8. Report Date 08.06, 2004 Dr. Winfried Schwarz 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Pollution and Marine Mammals
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECS/ASCOBANS/ACCOBAMS JOINT WORKSHOP ON CHEMICAL POLLUTION AND MARINE MAMMALS Held at the European Cetacean Society’s 25th Annual Conference Cádiz, Spain, 20th March 2011 Editor: Peter G.H. Evans ECS SPECIAL PUBLICATION SERIES NO. 55 Cover photo credits: Right: © Ron Wooten/Marine Photobank Left: © Peter G.H. Evans PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECS/ASCOBANS/ACCOBAMS JOINT WORKSHOP ON CHEMICAL POLLUTION AND MARINE MAMMALS Held at the European Cetacean Society’s 25th Annual Conference Cádiz, Spain, 20th March 2011 Editor: Peter G.H. Evans1, 2 1Sea Watch Foundation, Ewyn y Don, Bull Bay, Amlwch, Isle of Anglesey LL68 9SD 2 School of Ocean Sciences, University of Bangor, Menai Bridge, Isle of Anglesey, LL59 5AB, UK ECS SPECIAL PUBLICATION SERIES NO. 55 AUG 2013 a a CONTENTS Reijnders, Peter.J.H. Foreword: Some encouraging successes despite the never ending story ........... 2 Evans, Peter G.H. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Simmonds, Mark P. European cetaceans and pollutants: an historical perspective ........................... 4 Insights from long-term datasets Law, Robin and Barry, Jon. Long-term time-trends in organohalogen concentrations in blubber of porpoises from the UK .................................................................................................................. 9 Jepson, Paul D., Deaville, Rob, Barnett, James, Davison, Nick J., Paterson, Ian A.P., Penrose, Rod, S., Perkins, M.P., Reid, Robert J., and Law, Robin J. Persisent
    [Show full text]