Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules 23619

without change to http:// authorization. If authorization to enter, Participation and Request for www.regulations.gov and will include transit through, anchor in, or remain Comments’’ portion of the any personal information you have within the regulated area is granted by SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for provided. For more about privacy and the Captain of the Port Charleston or a further instructions on submitting the docket, visit http:// designated representative, all persons comments. www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. and vessels receiving such authorization FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If Documents mentioned in this NPRM must comply with the instructions of you have questions about this proposed as being available in the docket, and all the Captain of the Port Charleston or a rulemaking, call or email MST1 Kristina public comments, will be in our online designated representative. Pundt, Sector Waterways docket at http://www.regulations.gov (3) The Coast Guard will provide Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone and can be viewed by following that notice of the regulated area by local 718–354–4352, email Kristina.H.Pundt@ website’s instructions. Additionally, if notice to mariners, broadcast notice to uscg.mil. you go to the online docket and sign up mariners, and on-scene designated SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: for email alerts, you will be notified representatives. when comments are posted or a final (d) Enforcement Period. This rule will I. Table of Abbreviations rule is published. be enforced on July 4, 2018 from 8:45 CFR Code of Federal Regulations List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 p.m. until 10.15 p.m. DHS Department of Homeland Security Dated: May 16, 2018. FR Federal Register Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking J.W. Reed, (water), Reporting and recordkeeping § Section requirements, Security measures, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the U.S.C. United States Code Waterways. Port, Charleston. [FR Doc. 2018–10931 Filed 5–21–18; 8:45 am] II. Background, Purpose, and Legal For the reasons discussed in the Basis preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to BILLING CODE 9110–04–P amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: On September 29, 2014, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Proposed PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Rulemaking (NPRM) with a request for AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS SECURITY comments entitled, ‘‘Security Zones; Dignitary Arrival/Departure and United ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Coast Guard Nations Meetings, New York, NY’’ in continues to read as follows: the Federal Register (79 FR 58298). This 33 CFR Part 165 Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; NPRM proposed to disestablish three 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; [Docket Number USCG–2017–1081] regulated navigation areas (RNAs) and Department of Homeland Security Delegation replace each with a security zone. No No. 0170.1. RIN 1625–AA87 comments nor requests for a public meeting were received. On December ■ 2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0203 to Security Zones; Dignitary Arrival/ 30, 2014 the Coast Guard published a read as follows: Departure and United Nations Final Rule titled, ‘‘Security Zones; Meetings, New York, NY § 165.T07–0203 Safety Zone; Marshwalk Dignitary Arrival/Departure and United Group Independence Day Fireworks, AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. Nations Meetings, New York, NY’’ in Murrells Inlet, SC. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. the Federal Register (79 FR 78308). This (a) Location. The following is a safety final rule disestablished the RNAs and zone: Certain waters of the Atlantic SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to replaced each with a security zone. One Ocean at Murrells Inlet, South Carolina modify the Marine Air Terminal, of the security zones established was the within a 500-yard radius of Veterans LaGuardia Airport Security Zone. The Marine Air Terminal, LaGuardia Airport Fishing Pier. modification of the security zone would security zone. (b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated expand the existing security zone The purpose of this rulemaking is to representative’’ means Coast Guard boundary north along the modify the existing Marine Air Patrol Commanders, including Coast Bridge to the intersecting point on the Terminal, LaGuardia Airport security Guard coxswains, petty officers, and southern tip of Rikers Island then east zone. Due to location adjustments of other officers operating Coast Guard to the western end of LaGuardia Airport. security staging areas, the Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local This expanded security zone is has determined that modification of the officers designated by or assisting the necessary to protect the port, waterfront existing security zone is necessary to Captain of the Port Charleston in the facilities, and waters of the United safeguard the port, waterfront facilities, enforcement of the regulated areas. States from terrorism, sabotage, or other and waters of the United States from (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and subversive acts and incidents of a terrorism, sabotage, or other subversive vessels are prohibited from entering, similar nature during visits to New York acts and incidents of a similar nature transiting through, anchoring in, or City by various dignitaries. We invite during visits by various dignitaries to remaining within the regulated area your comments on this proposed . unless authorized by the Captain of the rulemaking. The Coast Guard proposes this Port Charleston or a designated rulemaking under the authority in 33 representative. DATES: Comments and related material U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR (2) Persons and vessels desiring to must be received by the Coast Guard on 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; and enter, transit through, anchor in, or or before July 23, 2018. Department of Homeland Security remain within the regulated area may ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Delegation No. 0170.1. contact the Captain of the Port identified by docket number USCG– Charleston by telephone at 843–740– 2017–1081 using the Federal III. Discussion of Proposed Rule 7050, or a designated representative via eRulemaking Portal at http:// The Coast Guard proposes to amend VHF radio on channel 16, to request www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public 33 CFR 165.164 by modifying the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 21, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM 22MYP1 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1 23620 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules

existing Marine Air Terminal, B. Impact on Small Entities federalism principles and preemption LaGuardia Airport security zone. The The Regulatory Flexibility Act of requirements described in Executive modification of the security zone would 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have expand the existing security zone requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive boundary north along the Rikers Island the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and Bridge to the intersecting point on the small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal southern tip of Rikers Island then east term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have to the western end of LaGuardia Airport. businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or Due to location adjustments of security that are independently owned and staging areas, the Coast Guard has more Indian tribes, on the relationship operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and determined that the existing security fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of zone does not provide an adequate level with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the of security. The proposed modification The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes. will allow enforcement of a security 605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has zone that will minimize threat exposure. have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian The regulatory text we are proposing a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed While some owners or operators of appears at the end of this document. in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION vessels intending to transit the security CONTACT section. IV. Regulatory Analyses zone may be small entities, for the E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act We developed this proposed rule after reasons stated in section IV.A above, considering numerous statutes and this proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Executive orders related to rulemaking. significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Below we summarize our analyses vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of based on a number of these statutes and If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In organization, or governmental Executive orders and we discuss First particular, the Act addresses actions jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity Amendment rights of protestors. that may result in the expenditure by a and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the A. Regulatory Planning and Review significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of please submit a comment (see $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this direct agencies to assess the costs and qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such benefits of available regulatory this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the alternatives and, if regulation is Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this necessary, to select regulatory Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble. approaches that maximize net benefits. Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), Executive Order 13771 directs agencies we want to assist small entities in F. Environment to control regulatory costs through a understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule budgeting process. This NPRM has not rule would affect your small business, under Department of Homeland been designated a ‘‘significant organization, or governmental Security Directive 023–01, which guides regulatory action,’’ under Executive jurisdiction and you have questions the Coast Guard in complying with the Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM concerning its provisions or options for National Environmental Policy Act of has not been reviewed by the Office of compliance, please contact the person 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have Management and Budget (OMB), and listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION made a preliminary determination that pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will this action is one of a category of actions from the requirements of Executive not retaliate against small entities that that do not individually or cumulatively Order 13771. question or complain about this have a significant effect on the human This regulatory action determination proposed rule or any policy or action of environment. This proposed rule is based on the limited size and the Coast Guard. involves the modification of a security zone that would prohibit entry into enforcement of the proposed security C. Collection of Information for a limited duration and zone. Although expanding upon the This proposed rule would not call for for a limited number of instances each current security zone, the proposed a new collection of information under year. Normally such actions are modification only encompasses a small the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 categorically excluded from further designated area of Bowery Bay. (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). review under paragraph L60(a) of Additionally, the proposed security Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction zone will only be enforced during the D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 01. A infrequent visits of domestic and foreign draft Record of Environmental dignitaries for as limited duration as A rule has implications for federalism Consideration supporting this necessary to safeguard against under Executive Order 13132, determination is available in the docket destruction, loss, or injury from Federalism, if it has a substantial direct where indicated under ADDRESSES. We sabotage or other subversive acts, effect on the States, on the relationship seek any comments or information that accidents, or other causes of a similar between the national government and may lead to the discovery of a nature. Moreover, the Coast Guard will the States, or on the distribution of significant environmental impact from issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via power and responsibilities among the this proposed rule. VHF–FM marine channel 16 prior to various levels of government. We have periods of enforcement. Lastly, the rule analyzed this proposed rule under that G. Protest Activities would continue to allow vessels to seek Order and have determined that it is The Coast Guard respects the First permission to transit the zone. consistent with the fundamental Amendment rights of protesters.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 21, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM 22MYP1 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 22, 2018 / Proposed Rules 23621

Protesters are asked to contact the ■ 2. In § 165.164, revise paragraph (a)(3) • Instructions: Comments will not be person listed in the FOR FURTHER to read as follows: accepted by fax, email, or in any way INFORMATION CONTACT section to (a) * * * other than those specified above. All coordinate protest activities so that your (3) Marine Air Terminal, LaGuardia submissions received must include the message can be received without Airport Security Zone: All waters of words ‘‘’’ or jeopardizing the safety or security of Bowery Bay, , New York, inside ‘‘NPS’’ and must include the docket people, places, or vessels. of a line drawn from the start of the number or RIN (1024–AE38) for this Rikers Island Bridge in Queens at rulemaking. Comments received will be V. Public Participation and Request for approximate position 40°46′37″ N, posted without change to http:// Comments 073°53′30″ W to the intersecting point www.regulations.gov, including any We view public participation as on the southern side of Rikers Island at personal information provided. essential to effective rulemaking, and approximate position 40°47′12″ N, • Docket: For access to the docket to will consider all comments and material 073°53′06″ W, then a line drawn east to read background documents or received during the comment period. the western end of LaGuardia Airport at comments received, go to http:// Your comment can help shape the approximate position 40°47′00″ N, www.regulations.gov. 073°52′44″ W, then a line drawn south outcome of this rulemaking. If you FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: following the shoreline back to the point submit a comment, please include the Herbert C. Frost, Regional Director, of origin at 40°46′37″ N, 073°53′30″ W docket number for this rulemaking, Alaska Regional Office, 240 West 5th (NAD 1983). indicate the specific section of this Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501. Phone document to which each comment Dated: May 7, 2018. (907) 644–3510. Email: AKR_ applies, and provide a reason for each M.H. Day, [email protected]. suggestion or recommendation. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We encourage you to submit Port New York. comments through the Federal [FR Doc. 2018–10899 Filed 5–21–18; 8:45 am] Background eRulemaking Portal at http:// BILLING CODE 9110–04–P On October 23, 2015, the National www.regulations.gov. If your material Park Service (NPS) published a final cannot be submitted using http:// rule (Final Rule) to amend its www.regulations.gov, contact the person DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR regulations for sport hunting and in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION trapping in national preserves in Alaska CONTACT section of this document for National Park Service (80 FR 64325). The Final Rule codified alternate instructions. prohibitions on certain types of harvest We accept anonymous comments. All 36 CFR Part 13 practices that are otherwise permitted comments received will be posted [NPS–AKRO–25579; PPAKAKROZ5, by the State of Alaska. The practices are: without change to http:// PPMPRLE1Y.L00000] Taking any black bear, including cubs www.regulations.gov and will include and sows with cubs, with artificial light any personal information you have RIN 1024–AE38 at den sites; harvesting brown bears over provided. For more about privacy and bait; taking wolves and coyotes Alaska; Hunting and Trapping in the docket, visit http:// (including pups) during the denning National Preserves www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice. season (between May 1 and August 9); Documents mentioned in this NPRM AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. taking swimming caribou; taking as being available in the docket, and all ACTION: Proposed rule. caribou from motorboats under power; public comments, will be in our online taking black bears over bait; and using docket at http://www.regulations.gov SUMMARY: The National Park Service dogs to hunt black bears. This rule is and can be viewed by following that proposes to amend its regulations for inconsistent with State of Alaska’s website’s instructions. Additionally, if sport hunting and trapping in national hunting regulations found at 5 AAC Part you go to the online docket and sign up preserves in Alaska. This proposed rule 85. for email alerts, you will be notified would remove a regulatory provision Since the publication of the Final when comments are posted or a final issued by the National Park Service in Rule, the Secretary of the Interior issued rule is published. 2015 that prohibited certain sport two Secretarial Orders regarding how hunting practices that are otherwise the Department of the Interior should List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 permitted by the State of Alaska. These manage recreational hunting and Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation proposed changes are consistent with trapping in the lands and waters it (water), Reporting and recordkeeping Secretary of the Interior Orders 3347 administers, and directing greater requirements, Security measures, and 3356. collaboration with state, tribe, and Waterways. DATES: Comments on the proposed rule territorial partners in doing so. For the reasons discussed in the must be received by 11:59 p.m. EST on On March 2, 2017, Secretary Zinke preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to July 23, 2018. signed Secretarial Order 3347, amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, Conservation Stewardship and Outdoor identified by Regulation Identifier Recreation. Part of the stated purpose of PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION Number (RIN) 1024–AE38, by either of Secretarial Order 3347 is to increase AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS the following methods: outdoor recreation and improve the • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// management of game species and their ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 www.regulations.gov. Follow the habitat. Secretarial Order 3347 directs continues to read as follows: instructions for submitting comments. the Department of the Interior to • Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Mail or hand deliver to: National identify specific actions to (1) expand 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Park Service, Regional Director, Alaska access significantly for recreational Department of Homeland Security Delegation Regional Office, 240 West 5th Ave., hunting and fishing on public lands; No. 0170.1. Anchorage, AK 99501. and (2) improve recreational hunting

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 May 21, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM 22MYP1 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1