DOCSLIB.ORG

Durst-Fed-Supress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Durst-Fed-Supress Case 2:15-cr-00091-HGB-SS Document 52-1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 55 CRIMINAL DOCKET NO. 15-CR-091 SECTION: “C” 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS. ROBERT DURST __________________________________________________________________ DEFENDANT ROBERT DURST’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO SUPPRESS __________________________________________________________________ Dick DeGuerin William P. Gibbens, 27225 Admitted Pro Hac Vice Ian Atkinson, 31605 DeGuerin, Dickson, Hennessy & Ward Schonekas, Evans, McGoey & 1018 Preston, 7th Floor McEachin, LLC Houston, Texas 77002 909 Poydras Street, Suite 1600 Telephone (713) 223-5959 New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 Facsimile (713) 223-9231 Telephone (504) 680-6050 [email protected] Facsimile (504) 680-6051 [email protected] [email protected] Chip B. Lewis David Z. Chesnoff Admitted Pro Hac Vice Admitted Pro Hac Vice Law Offices of Chip B. Lewis Chesnoff & Schonfeld 1207 S. Shepherd 520 S. Fourth Street Houston, Texas 77019 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone (713) 523-7878 Telephone (702) 384-5563 Facsimile (713) 523-7887 Facsimile (702) 598-1425 [email protected] [email protected] Case 2:15-cr-00091-HGB-SS Document 52-1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 2 of 55 TABLE OF CONTENTS Index of Authorities .........................................................................................................................v List of Exhibits ............................................................................................................................... ix Motion to Suppress ..........................................................................................................................1 I. Factual Background. ............................................................................................................2 A. Los Angeles Officers Obtained a Warrant for Durst’s Arrest in Response to an HBO Miniseries ..........................................................................2 B. The FBI Arrested Durst on the Ramey Warrant in a New Orleans Hotel Lobby .............................................................................................................5 C. The FBI Searched Durst’s Hotel Room Without a Warrant ....................................7 D. The Los Angeles Officers Sought a Louisiana Search Warrant to Try to Cleanse the Taint of the FBI’s Warrantless Search of the Hotel Room ..............................................................................................................8 II. Durst’s Arrest on the Ramey Warrant Violated the Fourth Amendment………………….9 A. The Franks v. Delaware Standard………………………………………………...9 B. Evidence from Durst’s Arrest Must Be Suppressed Because the Ramey Warrant Affidavit was Fatally Flawed under Franks ................................10 1. The Los Angeles officers omitted the fact that a handwriting expert had identified another person—someone who had failed a polygraph—as the author of the critical “cadaver” note .........................10 2. In addition to omitting material information about the handwriting comparisons, Detective Romero presented facts designed to mislead the magistrate ............................................................12 3. The omissions and misleading statements were material ..........................13 4. The affidavit for the Ramey warrant failed to state probable cause as written ..........................................................................................15 III. The FBI’s Failure to Mirandize Durst Mandates Exclusion of His Post-Arrest Statements ............................................................................................18 ii Case 2:15-cr-00091-HGB-SS Document 52-1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 3 of 55 A. Miranda Bars Admission of Unwarned Statements Obtained During Custodial Interrogation ..............................................................................18 B. The FBI Interrogated Durst While in Custody without Miranda Warnings ................................................................................................................19 IV. The Warrantless Search of Durst’s Hotel Room Violated the Fourth Amendment ..........21 A. Durst Had a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in His Hotel Room ....................21 B. The Warrantless Search of Durst’s Hotel Room Was Presumptively Unreasonable .................................................................................21 C. No Exception to the Warrant Requirement Applies ..............................................23 1. The search of Durst’s hotel room was not incident to the arrest that occurred in the lobby twenty-three floors below ............23 2. Durst did not consent to a search of his hotel room ...................................26 3. The warrantless search of Durst’s hotel room was not a valid inventory search .............................................................................27 D. The Inevitable Discovery Doctrine Cannot Cure the Constitutional Violations ...............................................................................................................30 V. The After-the-Fact Search Warrant Did Not Cure the Unconstitutional Arrest, Interrogation, and Warrantless Search ...................................................................33 A. There Was No Reason to Believe that Room 2303 Contained Evidence of Any Crime ........................................................................33 1. The information used to obtain the warrant was stale ...............................33 2. There was no nexus between Room 2303 and any possible evidence relating to the California murder or any other crime ......................................................................................34 B. The Hotel Room Search Warrant Was Tainted by the Preceding Arrest, Interrogation, and Warrantless Search .......................................................36 C. The Independent Source Doctrine Does Not Apply in this Case ...........................36 1. The independent source rule applies only to genuinely independent police effort. ..........................................................................37 iii Case 2:15-cr-00091-HGB-SS Document 52-1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 4 of 55 2. Information and evidence obtained by the FBI before a warrant was sought ..................................................................................................38 3. The places to be searched and the items sought by the search warrant .......................................................................................................39 4. Chart ...........................................................................................................40 5. The government cannot sustain its burden to establish that the search warrant provided a completely independent source of the evidence found in Durst’s hotel room .............................................41 VI. Conclusion .........................................................................................................................44 iv Case 2:15-cr-00091-HGB-SS Document 52-1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 5 of 55 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES United States Supreme Court Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009) ...........................................................................................22 Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968) .....................................................................26,27 Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971) .......................................................................22 Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) ...............................................................................24,25 Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1 (1990) ...............................................................................................27 Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) ................................................................1,9,10,13,14,17 Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) ......................................................................................12,17 Illinois v. Lafayette, 462 U.S. 640 (1983) ......................................................................................27 Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 (1948) ...............................................................................22 Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) ...................................................................................22 Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001) ....................................................................................28 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) ......................................................1,6,18,19,20,27,41,44 Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533 (1988) ...............................................................30,36,37,42 Nat’l Treasury Emps. Union v. Von Raab, 489 U.S. 656 (1989)...................................................22 New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981) ......................................................................................23 Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984) ............................................................................................37 Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996) ...........................................................................................26 Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928) ...........................................................................21 Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291 (1980) ...................................................................................19
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to the Lee Hancock Collection
    A Guide to the Lee Hancock Collection, 1975 – 2004, Bulk: 1993-2000 Collection 099 Descriptive Summary Creator: Hancock, Lee Title: Lee Hancock Collection Dates: 1975 – 2004, Bulk: 1993-2000 Abstract: Documents, clippings, videos, and other research materials represent journalist Lee Hancock’s research into the events of the Branch Davidian standoff near Waco in 1993. The materials are arranged into the following five series: Non-Branch Davidian Incidents, Media Coverage, Investigations, House of Representatives Hearings, and Lawsuits. Identification: Collection 099 Extent: 20 boxes (10 linear feet) Language: Materials are written in English Repository: Southwestern Writers Collection, Special Collections, Alkek Library, Texas State University-San Marcos Lee Hancock Collection SWWC Collection 099 Historical Sketch On February 28, 1993 the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) attempted to issue an arrest warrant for Vernon Wayne Howell and a search warrant for the Mount Carmel Center near Waco, Texas on the basis of illegal weapons possession. The Branch Davidians in Mount Carmel and the ATF began a shootout that ended in the deaths of four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians. The occupants of Mount Carmel and government agencies remained in a standoff for fifty-one days until the FBI launched CS gas into the compound in an effort to make the Branch Davidians exit. The CS gas assault on April 19, 1993 ended in a fire in which seventy-six people inside Mount Carmel died, including twenty-three children. After the fire a series of lawsuits and investigations began, including the 1994 criminal trial of the Branch Davidians, the 1995 congressional hearings, and a wrongful-death civil trial in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin
    NUMBER 55 WINTER 2007 THE BULLETIN 56th ANNUAL MEETING A RESOUNDING SUCCESS First to London 9/14-17 then Dublin 9/17-20, 2006 F rom in Dublin, the spirited Republic of musical greeting Ireland. It has of a uniformed band become a tradition of welcoming them to stately the College periodically to Kensington Palace, the former home return to London, to the roots of of Diana, Princess of Wales, to an impromptu a the legal profession in the common law world, and capella rendition of Danny Boy by a Nobel Laureate to visit another country in Europe afterwards. at the end of the last evening in Dublin Castle, the 56th Annual Meeting of the American College of Trial The Board of Regents, including the past presidents, Lawyers in London and the follow-up conference in meeting in advance of the Fellows’ London meeting, Dublin were memorable events. had represented the United States at an evensong service at Westminster Abbey, commemorating the More than 1,200 Fellows and their spouses attended fifth anniversary of 9/11. After the service, President the London meeting, the fifth the College has held Michael A. Cooper laid a wreath on the memorial in that city and the first since 1998. And 510 of to The Innocent Victims, located in the courtyard them continued to the College’s first ever meeting outside the West Door of the Abbey. The Regents LONDON-DUBLIN, con’t on page 37 This Issue: 88 PAGES Profile: SYLVIA WALBOLT p. 17 NOTABLE QUOTE FROM the LONDON-DUBLIN MEETING ““Let us pray.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jinx, the Imposter, and Re-Enacting the Digital Thriller in True Crime Documentaries
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 3-23-2017 "You want it all to happen now!": The inxJ , The Imposter, and Re-enacting the Digital Thriller in True Crime Documentaries Brett ichM ael Phillips University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Other Film and Media Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Phillips, Brett ichM ael, ""You want it all to happen now!": The inxJ , The mposI ter, and Re-enacting the Digital Thriller in True Crime Documentaries" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6743 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “You want it all to happen now!”: The Jinx, The Imposter, and Re-enacting the Digital Thriller in True Crime Documentaries by Brett Phillips A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Film Studies Department of Humanities and Cultural Studies College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Amy Rust, Ph.D. Maria Cizmic, Ph.D. Andrew Berish, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 10, 2017 Keywords: True crime, Documentary, Digital, Thriller, Reenactment, Affect Copyright © 2017, Brett Phillips ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, thank you to Amy, Maria, and Andrew for not only helping me shape this thesis—with both tiny chisel and sledgehammer—but for guiding me through an entire discipline with kindness and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Texans for Public Justice Amicus Curiae Brief
    NO. PD-1465-13 IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS THOMAS DALE DELAY APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE TEXANS FOR PUBLIC JUSTICE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Case No. 03-11-00087-CR KEITH S. HAMPTON Attorney at Law 1103 Nueces Street Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 476-8484 (office) (512) 477-3580 (fax) [email protected] State Bar No. 08873230 ATTORNEY FOR AMICUS CURIAE IDENTITIES OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL Pursuant to the provisions of Rules 38.1(a), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, a complete list of the names of all parties to this action are as follows: Thomas Dale DeLay — Appellant State of Texas — Appellee Appellant’s Appellate Counsel Brian Wice Adele Hedges Attorney at Law Attorney at Law The Lyric Center 2719 Colquitt 440 Louisiana, Suite 900 Houston, Texas 77098 Houston, Texas 77002-1635 Appellant’s Trial Counsel Dick DeGuerin, Matt Hennessy, Catherine Baen 1018 Preston 7th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 Attorneys for State Holly Taylor (on appeal) Gary Cobb, Steve Brand, and Beverly Matthews (at trial) Travis County District Attorney’s Office 509 West 11th Street Austin, Texas 78767 DISCLOSURE REGARDING FEES: Pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, counsel for amicus curiae states that the source of any fee paid or expected is Texans for Public Justice. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS IDENTITIES OF ALL PARTIES. ii DISCLOSURE REGARDING FEES. ii INDEX OF AUTHORITIES. iv STATEMENT OF THE CASE. 1 ISSUES PRESENTED. 2 SUMMARY OF FACTS.. 3 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT.
    [Show full text]
  • Huck Finn, the River & Trying Your Case
    HUCK FINN, THE RIVER AND TRYING YOUR CASE Sponsor: KBA Criminal Law Section CLE Credit: 1.0 Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:25 p.m. - 3:25 p.m. Exhibit Hall I Northern Kentucky Convention Center Covington, Kentucky A NOTE CONCERNING THE PROGRAM MATERIALS The materials included in this Kentucky Bar Association Continuing Legal Education handbook are intended to provide current and accurate information about the subject matter covered. No representation or warranty is made concerning the application of the legal or other principles discussed by the instructors to any specific fact situation, nor is any prediction made concerning how any particular judge or jury will interpret or apply such principles. The proper interpretation or application of the principles discussed is a matter for the considered judgment of the individual legal practitioner. The faculty and staff of this Kentucky Bar Association CLE program disclaim liability therefore. Attorneys using these materials, or information otherwise conveyed during the program, in dealing with a specific legal matter have a duty to research original and current sources of authority. Printed by: Evolution Creative Solutions 7107 Shona Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45237 Kentucky Bar Association TABLE OF CONTENTS The Presenter .................................................................................................................. i Item One: Terry Nichols ................................................................................................. 1 Items Two and Three – From the Case of Orlando Cordia Hall ..................................... 63 THE PRESENTER Professor Michael E. Tigar Duke University School of Law Post Office Box 528 Oriental, North Carolina 28571 MICHAEL E. TIGAR is the Emeritus Professor of the Practice of Law at Duke University School of Law and Washington College of Law, American University, Washington, D.C. He received his B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Chronological Table of Events
    APPENDIX C CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE OF EVENTS DATE/TIME1 EVENT SOURCE Spring 1992 Mark England and Darlene McCormick, reporters for the Waco Administrative Review Interview of Waco Waco Tribune-Herald, begin inquiry into the activities of Tribune-Herald Reporter Mark England dated the residents at Mt. Carmel, particularly Vernon Howell 7/20/93 (SCSL01-08505000) (TAB 1) (also known as David Koresh); receive information that Waco Administrative Review Interview of Waco firearms and ammunition were being delivered to Mt. Tribune-Herald Reporter Darlene McCormick dated Carmel 7/21/93 (SCSL01-08505222) (TAB 2) 5/92 McLennan County Sheriff’s Department refers Waco Administrative Review Interview of ATF information regarding suspected criminal activity at Mt. Agent Charles Meyer dated 6/2/93 (SCSL01- Carmel to Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms 15309830) (TAB 3) (“ATF”) 6/4/92 ATF Agent Davy Aguilera meets with Assistant United Waco Administrative Review Interview of ATF States Attorney William Johnston; Johnston informs him Agent Davy Aguilera dated 6/8/93 - 6/9/93 he is glad someone is going to do something with the (SCSL01-01805484) (TAB 4) information and in his opinion it is going to be a big case 1All times are Central Standard Time and are approximate 1 6/4/92 Lt. Gene Barber of the McLennan County Sheriff’s Report of Investigation by ATF Agent Aguilera Department meets with ATF Agent Aguilera and provides dated 6/8/92 (SCSL02-06400073) (TAB 5) additional background information regarding suspected Waco Administrative Review Interview of ATF criminal activities of Koresh Agent Aguilera dated 6/8-9/93 (SCSL01-01805484) (TAB 4) Chronology of Events Leading up to the Search Warrant by ATF Agent Aguilera (SCSL01- 01900951) (TAB 6) 6/5/92 ATF Agent Aguilera begins tracking United Parcel Waco Administrative Review Interview of ATF Service (“UPS”) shipments, interviews former residents Agent Aguilera dated 6/8-9/93 (SCSL01-01805484) of the Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Durst: an Id Murder Mystery”
    HOW THE MIGHTY HAVE FALLEN: ID EXPLORES THE BIZARRE LIFE OF INFAMOUS REAL ESTATE TYCOON IN LIMITED SERIES “ROBERT DURST: AN ID MURDER MYSTERY” - Two-Part Special Event Premieres Monday, January 21 at 9/8c, Exclusively on Investigation Discovery- (Silver Spring, MD) – Money, privilege and power – millionaire Robert Durst had it all. But behind closed doors, Durst was more than a mogul… he was wanted for murder. The latest installment in the top- rated ID Murder Mystery franchise from America’s leading true crime network, Investigation Discovery (ID), ROBERT DURST: AN ID MURDER MYSTERY, delves into the twisted truth behind one of New York’s most infamous real estate heirs. From the suspicious disappearance of Durst’s wife, Kathleen, to the execution-style murder of his confidant, Susan Berman, and finally the brutal killing of his neighbor, Morris Black, this two-part special event pulls the curtain back on this 40-year saga. ROBERT DURST: AN ID MURDER MYSTERY premieres Monday, January 21 at 9/8c and Tuesday, January 22 at 9/8c, only on Investigation Discovery. “Truth is stranger than fiction, and there are few stories as bizarre – and, frankly, disturbing – as the one currently unraveling, today, around Robert Durst,” said Henry Schleiff, Group President of Investigation Discovery, Travel Channel, American Heroes Channel and Destination America. “The adage that money can’t buy happiness rings especially true in the epic tale of Robert Durst – and, perhaps, in this case, we’ll learn that it also can’t buy freedom.” ROBERT DURST: AN ID MURDER MYSTERY is an unabridged look into the investigation of Robert Durst for the murder of Susan Berman, Durst’s close friend, who was found shot execution-style nearly two decades ago.
    [Show full text]
  • 15-091 Rober
    Case 2:15-cr-00091-HGB-SS Document 136 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER: 15-091 ROBERT DURST SECTION C (1) ORDER and REASONS Before this Court is Robert Durst's Motion to Suppress filed on June 4, 2015. Rec. Doc. 52. Mr. Durst seeks to suppress evidence from: (1) his arrest; (2) the subsequent interrogation; (3) the warrantless search of his hotel room; and (4) the subsequent execution of a search warrant of the same hotel room. The government has filed an opposition on September 4, 2015. Rec. Doc. 115. Mr. Durst was granted leave to file a reply which he did on September 16, 2015. Rec. Doc. 129. The Court issued an order for supplemental briefing regarding the issue of whether an evidentiary hearing was warranted. Rec. Doc. 124. Mr. Durst and the government each filed a memorandum on the issue. Rec. Docs. 126 and 127. After reviewing the extensive pleadings and exhibits submitted, including the requested supplemental memoranda, the court finds that the Motion to Suppress can be resolved without an evidentiary hearing. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED. I. Background Defendant, Robert Durst is currently under indictment for allegedly violating 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Rec. Doc. 9. The indictment stems from events occurring on March 14, 2015 at the J.W. Marriott Hotel in New Orleans. While at the hotel to execute a probable cause arrest warrant for Durst issued by California authorities, federal agents arrested Durst.
    [Show full text]
  • Guilty Pleasure: a Case Study of True Crime's Resurgence in a Binge
    A Case Study of True Crime’s Resurgence in a Binge Consumption Era by Rachel Tinker — 95 Guilty Pleasure: A Case Study of True Crime’s Resurgence in a Binge Consumption Era Rachel Tinker Strategic Communications Elon University Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in an undergraduate senior capstone course in communications Abstract While the fascination of the true crime genre can be traced to the 16th century, it has grown in widespread popularity in the last three years. This study explored potential causes for why the genre has become popular through a narrative rhetorical analysis of three popular pieces of true crime media – season one of the podcast Serial, The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst, and Making a Murderer. The study found that the true crime genre has grown due to a variety of circumstances, largely because of the resurgence of the binge-consumption era, which allows the audience to get more instant gratification for the program’s cliffhangers. It can also be deduced that true crime shows with certain rhetorical consistencies are more likely to take off in today’s media landscape. I. Introduction Humans’ bloody fascination with crime and murder has been linked to primitive needs for safety and security, in addition to the desire for certainty and justice.1 Within the last three years, the “true crime” genre has experienced a cultural revolution of sorts, and can be found across a variety of media platforms, from Netflix and HBO to podcasts and magazines. True crime, as it is referred to throughout the remainder of this paper, is broadly defined by Oxford Dictionary as “a genre of writing, film, etc., in which real crimes are examined or portrayed.”2 What used to be relegated to a specific corner of media is now stretching into the likes of CBS and NBC; as cable channels like the Oxygen Network focus solely on true crime, it gains additional coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Dismisses Charges Against Sen. Hutchison Mammoth Discovery
    TCU Daily Skiff Wednesday, October 27, 1993 Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas 9lst Year, No. 35 Founding Judge dismisses Brothers come charges against home Sen. Hutchison By SCOTT ROTHSCHILD missed because of the improperly Associated Press seated grand juror. Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle had AUSTIN — Indictments charging agreed. U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison with But on Monday. Hutchison's official misconduct were dismissed defense team surprised State District by a state judge Tuesday, but the sen- Judge Mike Lynch by asking that the ator remained under investigation. charges stand so that Hutchison's The indictments were dropped trial could start as initial K scheduled after Hutchison's lawyers discovered Nov. 29. that the grand jury which handed Instead of the grand jury charges. them up included a juror who was Hutchison's attorney Dick DeGuerin ineligible because of a charge pend- said she could face charges, called an ing against him since 19X8 for a S20 information, issued directly b\ the hot check. district attorney's office. A second grand jury has already But Earle called the move a legal resumed the investigation into trick to make it appear Hutchison Hutchison, prosecutors said. A for- wanted a speedy resolution of the "Brothers," the statue commemorating TCU founders Addison mer aide to Hutchison when she was case, while her attorneys delayed and Randolph Clark, is installed in the mall outside Winton-Scott state treasurer was subpoenaed Tues- proceedings with other motions chal- day. lenging the way the grand jury gath- Hall Tuesday morning. The statue will be dedicated Saturday at 10 Hutchison, a Republican, was ered evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • OF CRIMINAL LAW Published at the University of Texas School of Law
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW Published at The University of Texas School of Law MASS INCARCERATION AND THE DEATH PENALTY SYMPOSIUM ISSUE ARTICLES Law and Loss: Notes on the Legal Construction of Pain Meredith Martin Rountree Texas Ain't Tuscany: How a Truism Might Further Invigorate Contemporary "Cost Arguments" for Death-Penalty Abolition Gretchen Sween The Death Penalty and Mass Incarceration: Convergences and Divergences Carol S. Steiker & JordanM. Steiker VOLUME 41 SPRING 2014 NUMBER 2 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW Mass Incarceration and the Death Penalty Symposium Issue VOLUME 41 SPRING 2014 NUMBER 2 I Published at The University of Texas School of Law Copyright AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW 2014 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW Published at The University of Texas School of Law VOLUME 41 REBECA OJEDA Editor in Chief GRACE WITSIL Managing Editor SAMANTHA JARVIS SARA SCHAEFER PATRICK PRICE ChiefArticles Editor Executive Editors TIM EMMONS Editor-at-Large KATHERINE JORDAN JAMIE FELL Chief Manuscript Editor Articles Editor MAX AFRICK REBECCA MATA-LASKY JAMES BABIKIAN JACK YEH LISA ELIZONDO NEGAD ZAKY CHRISTOPHER LARSON Manuscript Editors Manuscript Editors Staff Jenna Al-Malawi Jessica Johnson Michael Redden Michael Borofsky Bryan Jones Poorav Rohatgi Worth Carroll Paul Knowlton Maritza Sanchez AnneMarie Chiarello Deanna Markowitz Theanna Sedlock Ryan Delgado Trevor Melvin Emily Schomburger Elena Esparza Michael Morehead Chris Soper Brad Estes Colleen Mulholland Alethea Anne Swift Julia Gonzalez Will Odum Nafisa Teague Jeffrey Guidry Ryan Pate Sarah Valenzuela Stancell Haigwood Rebecca Piller Russell Welch Johnathan Hinders Ethan Ranis Adam Whiteside Julia Wilson Jennifer Laurin Paul Goldman Faculty Advisor Business Manager ii SUBSCRIPTIONS The American Journal of Criminal Law (ISSN 0092-2315) is published triannually (Winter, Spring, Summer) under license by The University of Texas School of Law Publications, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Anderson Dual Citizen (American-Canadian) SAG, AFTRA, ACTRA, AEA, UBCP *Comedy Website (Demo)
    Marina Anderson Dual citizen (American-Canadian) SAG, AFTRA, ACTRA, AEA, UBCP *comedy Website (demo): www.MarinaAnderson.com FILM: (includes Starring/supporting) THE RED MAPLE LEAF AOF award winner Ambassador's mistress Frank D'Angelo In Your Ear Prods. LICENSE TO WED * Susan Ken Kwapis Warner Bros. STEP BROS * Executive Adam McKay Columbia Picts LEGACY The Motion Picture Academy Award and The Carl E. David Award Starring Michael Rohrbaugh Indue THE IDEA OF GROWING OLD Supporting Alyssa Stratton Scotty K Films IN HONOR OF Supporting Ben Mears Wishbone Films DERAILED HEART Supporting Brent Roske Company 9 WHEATFIELD WITH CROWS * Supporting Brent Roske Film Federation NAKED MOVIE * Cameo Sam Henry Kass Joe Head Prods. THE GOOD LIFE * Cameo Matthew Harrison FM Ent. – Frank Stallone SEX & MRS 'X' * Supporting Arthur Seidelman Lifetime/Hearst Ent ZOO * Cameo Alex King Pilgrim 5 Prods. DANGEROUS CURVES Co-Lead Jeremiah Cullinane Concorde/New Horizons NATURAL SELECTION * Supporting Mark Bristol 24-36 Prods. THE PUZZLE IN THE AIR Cameo Gino Cabanas TRLT Prods. AMERICAN REEL * Supporting Mark Archer Alexander Cohen THE GIVER/Donor/LA DONNEUSE Starring Jean-Marie Pallardy Tropic Films KISS OF A STRANGER Supporting Sam Irvin Regent Entertainment SHEPHERD Co-lead Peter Hayman Producers Network MACON COUNTY JAIL Co-lead Victoria Muspratt Concorde/New Horizons SHATTERED ILLUSIONS Principal Becky Best World Wide Films 32 SHORT FILMS ABOUT GLENN GOULD Mother Francois Girard Rombus Media 4 Genie Awards including Best Picture and director - Canada SCALES
    [Show full text]