DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex 3 Specifications for the Royal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex 3 Specifications for the Royal Edinburgh Research Explorer Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications Citation for published version: Fowler, D, Amann, M, Anderson, R, Ashmore, M, Cox, P, Depledge, M, Derwent, D, Grennfelt, P, Hewitt, N, Hov, O, Jenkin, M, Kelly, F, Liss, P, Pilling, M, Pyle, J, Slingo, J & Stevenson, D 2008, Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications. Royal Society Policy Document 15/08, vol. 15/08, RS1276 edn, The Royal Society, London. <http://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2008/ground-level-ozone/> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications Science Policy REPORT 15/08 October 2008 Price £39 web royalsociety.org Cover image: Sunrise over the River Ganges in Varanasi, India showing a sunny and polluted sky, characteristic of photochemical smog. Courtesy of Dr Mhairi Coyle, CEH Edinburgh. Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications RS Policy document 15/08 Issued: October 2008 RS1276 ISBN: 978-0-85403-713-1 © The Royal Society, 2008 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: The Royal Society Science Policy 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG Tel 44 (0)20 7451 2500 Email [email protected] Web royalsociety.org Design by Franziska Hinz, London Copyedited and Typeset by Techset Composition Limited Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications Contents Membership of working group vii Executive summary ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is ground-level ozone and why does it matter? 2 1.2 Sources of ozone emissions and drivers of production now and in the future 2 1.3 Approaches to controlling ozone 3 1.4 Conduct of the study 4 2 The ground-level ozone policy context 5 2.1 Meeting the challenge – the current state of play 6 2.2 The effects of controls to date 7 2.3 International shipping and aviation 9 2.4 The role of science in meeting the ozone policy challenge 9 2.5 Conclusions 9 3 Ozone in the troposphere: processes of ozone production and destruction 11 3.1 Introduction 11 3.2 The lifetime and atmospheric budget of tropospheric ozone 11 3.3 Ozone atmospheric chemistry 11 3.4 Surface ozone destruction processes – dry deposition to the land and ocean 17 3.5 Effects of weather and topography on ground-level ozone 18 3.6 Trends in ground-level ozone 20 3.7 Conclusions 21 4 Natural and anthropogenic emissions of ozone precursor compounds 23 4.1 Introduction 23 4.2 Sources of ozone precursors 23 4.3 Future emissions analysis 23 4.4 Gaps and uncertainties 39 4.5 Conclusions 39 5 Model projections of future ground-level ozone at global, regional and urban scales 41 5.1 Introduction 41 5.2 Global modelling 41 The Royal Society Ground-level ozone in the 21st century I October 2008 I iii 5.3 Regional modelling 50 5.4 Urban modelling 52 5.5 Uncertainties in model projections 54 5.6 Conclusions 54 6 Climate–ozone interactions 57 6.1 Introduction 57 6.2 Effects of weather and climate on background ozone levels 57 6.3 Effects of changes in weather on peak ozone episodes 60 6.4 Tropospheric ozone changes as a driver of climate change 64 6.5 Gaps and uncertainties 64 6.6 Conclusions 65 7 The effects of ozone on human health 67 7.1 Introduction 67 7.2 Mechanisms of ozone effects – how does ozone cause damage to human health? 67 7.3 Measuring and assessing the effects of ozone on human health 67 7.4 Current human health impacts 69 7.5 Future human health impacts: how significant will the effects of ozone on human health be over the next century? 73 7.6 Conclusion 74 8 Impacts of ozone on the environment 75 8.1 Introduction 75 8.2 Mechanisms and assessment of ozone effects on vegetation 75 8.3 The impacts of ozone on vegetation 77 8.4 How significant will the global impacts of ozone be on the environment over the next century? 81 8.5 Conclusions 84 9 The policy implications of projected changes in ozone concentrations over the 21st century 85 9.1 Emission controls 85 9.2 The implications of climate change for future ozone 86 9.3 Implications of future ozone projections for food security 86 9.4 Improving policy integration 87 9.5 Capacity building 90 9.6 Conclusions 90 10 Research and development 93 10.1 Ozone precursor emissions 93 10.2 Modelling 94 10.3 Evaluating human health impacts 95 10.4 Evaluating environmental impacts 95 10.5 Other research requirements 96 iv I October 2008 I Ground-level ozone in the 21st century The Royal Society 11 Conclusions and recommendations 99 11.1 Ground-level ozone as a global pollutant 99 11.2 Ground-level ozone chemistry – relevance to ozone control 99 11.3 Ground-level ozone in the future 99 11.4 The effects of climate change on future ozone concentrations 100 11.5 Impacts of ozone on human health 101 11.6 The environmental impacts of ozone 102 11.7 Improving ozone policy 102 11.8 Science and research needs 103 Acknowledgements 105 References 107 Annex 1 Glossary and abbreviations 119 Annex 2 Call for evidence response and workshop attendees 123 Annex 3 Specifications for the Royal Society 2050 chemistry–climate simulations 127 The Royal Society Ground-level ozone in the 21st century I October 2008 I v vi I October 2008 I Ground-level ozone in the 21st century The Royal Society Membership of working group The members of the working group involved in producing this report were as follows: Chair Professor David Fowler CBE FRS UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK Members Dr Markus Amann Head of the Atmospheric Pollution and Economic Development Program at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria Professor Ross Anderson FMedSci Professor of Epidemiology and Public Health and Honorary Consultant in Public Health Medicine, St George’s Hospital University of London, UK Professor Mike Ashmore Professor of Environmental Science, Environment Department, University of York, UK Professor Peter Cox Met Office Chair in Climate System Dynamics, University of Exeter, UK Professor Michael Depledge DSc Chair of Environment and Human Health Peninsula Medical School (Universities of Exeter and Plymouth) and Member of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, UK Professor Dick Derwent OBE Director, rdscientific, Honorary Professor in School of Geography and Environmental Sciences at the University of Birmingham, Part-time Professor in the Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial College London and Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Life Sciences, King’s College London, UK Professor Peringe Grennfelt Scientific Director, IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd, Sweden Professor Nick Hewitt Professor of Atmospheric Chemistry, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, UK Professor Oystein Hov Director of Research, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway Dr Mike Jenkin Principle Research Fellow, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Centre for Environment Policy, Imperial College, London, UK Professor Frank Kelly Professor of Environmental Health, Kings College London, UK Professor Peter Liss CBE FRS Professor in the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK Professor Mike Pilling CBE Professor of Physical Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, UK Professor John Pyle FRS Co-Director, National Center for Atmospheric Science and Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, UK Professor Julia Slingo OBE Director of Climate Research, National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Walker Institute, University of Reading, UK Dr David Stevenson Senior Lecturer in Atmospheric Modelling, Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science, University of Edinburgh, UK Secretariat Ms Rachel Garthwaite Manager (Environment and Climate Change) Ms Rachel Newton Policy Officer (Environment and Climate Change) Ms Beverley Darkin Team Leader (Environment, Energy and Climate Change) The Royal Society Ground-level ozone in the 21st century I October 2008 I vii This report has been reviewed by an independent panel of experts and also approved by the Council of the Royal Society. Review Panel Sir David Read FRS Chair of Biological Secretary of the Royal Society and Emeritus Professor of Plant Sciences, Review Panel University of Sheffield Professor Ken Donaldson MRC and University of Edinburgh Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute Sir Brian Hoskins CBE FRS Director, Grantham Institute for Climate Change, Imperial College London Professor Ivar Isaksen Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo Professor Terry Keating Office of Air & Radiation (OAR/OPAR), US Environmental Protection Agency Professor Nino Kuenzli ICREA Research
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weathering Heights 08 July 2020 James Hansen
    Weathering Heights 08 July 2020 James Hansen In 2007 Bill McKibben asked me whether 450 ppm would be a reasonable target for atmospheric CO2, if we wished to maintain a hospitable climate for future generations. 450 ppm seemed clearly too high, based on several lines of evidence, but especially based on paleoclimate data for climate change. We were just then working on a paper,1 Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric carbon dioxide, 2 that included consideration of CO2 changes over the Cenozoic era, the past 65 million years, since the end of the Cretaceous era. The natural source of atmospheric CO2 is volcanic emissions that occur mainly at continental margins due to plate tectonics (“continental drift”). The natural sink is the weathering process, which ultimately deposits carbon on the ocean floor as limestone. David Beerling, an expert in trace gas biogeochemistry at the University of Sheffield, was an organizer of the meeting at which I presented the above referenced paper. Soon thereafter I enlisted David and other paleoclimate experts to help answer Bill’s question about a safe level of atmospheric CO2, which we concluded was somewhere south of 350 ppm.3 Since then, my group at Climate Science, Awareness and Solutions (CSAS), has continued to cooperate with David’s group at the University of Sheffield. One of the objectives is to investigate the potential for drawdown of atmospheric CO2 by speeding up the weathering process. In the most recent paper, which will be published in Nature tomorrow, David and co-authors report on progress in testing the potential for large-scale CO2 removal via application of rock dust on croplands.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert A. Berner 1935–2015
    Robert A. Berner 1935–2015 A Biographical Memoir by Donald E. Canfield ©2019 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. ROBERT ARBUCKLE BERNER November 25, 1935–January 10, 2015 Elected to the NAS, 1987 Bob Berner passed away on January 10, 2015, closing the final chapter of one of the most influential and colorful geochemists of all time. I had the pleasure of working as a Ph.D. student with Bob from 1982 to 1988, a period of particular innovation and transformation in his scientific career. In what follows, I will provide some brief recol- lections of Bob as a person and mentor, while taking full account of his contributions to science. The reader is also directed to Bob’s excellent autobiography (Berner 2013 ). Bob as a Person Bob Berner, walking down the hall, his grey turtle neck half untucked at the back, with a big toothy grin; that’s the way I will remember him. Especially the grin. Bob was, of By Donald E. Canfield course, a scientific legend. We’ll get to that in a moment. But, he was also very much more than that. Bob was fun, and he loved a party. He also loved a good meal and good glass of wine. Bob was a decided Francophile and learned the basics of the French language. He had a favorite Parisian café where he knew the chef personally, and they knew Bob’s favorite meal and wine.
    [Show full text]
  • Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?
    Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim? James Hansen,1,2* Makiko Sato,1,2 Pushker Kharecha,1,2 David Beerling,3 Valerie Masson-Delmotte,4 Mark Pagani,5 Maureen Raymo,6 Dana L. Royer,7 James C. Zachos8 Paleoclimate data show that climate sensitivity is ~3°C for doubled CO2, including only fast feedback processes. Equilibrium sensitivity, including slower surface albedo feedbacks, is ~6°C for doubled CO2 for the range of climate states between glacial conditions and ice- free Antarctica. Decreasing CO2 was the main cause of a cooling trend that began 50 million years ago, large scale glaciation occurring when CO2 fell to 425±75 ppm, a level that will be exceeded within decades, barring prompt policy changes. If humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on Earth is adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change suggest that CO2 will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm. The largest uncertainty in the target arises from possible changes of non-CO2 forcings. An initial 350 ppm CO2 target may be achievable by phasing out coal use except where CO2 is captured and adopting agricultural and forestry practices that sequester carbon. If the present overshoot of this target CO2 is not brief, there is a possibility of seeding irreversible catastrophic effects. Human activities are altering Earth’s atmospheric composition. Concern about global warming due to long-lived human-made greenhouse gases (GHGs) led to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1) with the objective of stabilizing GHGs in the atmosphere at a level preventing “dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2) and others (3) used several “reasons for concern” to estimate that global warming of more than 2-3°C may be dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Society: Greenhouse Gas Removal (Report)
    Greenhouse gas removal In 2017 the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering were asked by the UK Government to consider scientific and engineering views on greenhouse gas removal. This report draws on a breadth of expertise including that of the Fellowships of the two academies to identify the range of available greenhouse gas removal methods, the factors that will affect their use and consider how they may be deployed together to meet climate targets, both in the UK and globally. The Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering would like to acknowledge the European Academies’ Science Advisory Council report on negative emission technologies (easac.eu/publications/details/easac-net), which provided a valuable contribution to a number of discussions throughout this project. Greenhouse gas removal Issued: September 2018 DES5563_1 ISBN: 978-1-78252-349-9 The text of this work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. The license is available at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Images are not covered by this license. This report can be viewed online at: royalsociety.org/greenhouse-gas-removal Erratum: The first edition of this report raeng.org.uk/greenhousegasremoval incorrectly listed the area of saltmarsh in the UK as 0.45 Mha, which is instead 0.045 Mha. This error has been corrected in the UK Cover image Visualisation of global atmospheric carbon dioxide scenario on p96 and the corresponding surface concentration by Cameron Beccario, earth.nullschool.net, GGR for habitat restoration adjusted. The using GEOS-5 data provided by the Global Modeling and Assimilation conclusions of this report and the UK net-zero Office (GMAO) at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Number 85
    The Palaeontology Newsletter Contents 85 Editorial 2 Association Business 3 Association Meetings 16 From our correspondents 28,000 leagues across the sea 20 R for palaeontologists: Introduction 28 Future meetings of other bodies 39 Meeting Reports 46 Obituary Richard Aldridge 66 Sylvester-Bradley reports 69 Publicity Officer: Old Fossils, New Media 82 Book Reviews 85 Books available to review 92 Palaeontology vol 57 parts 1 & 2 93–94 Reminder: The deadline for copy for Issue no 86 is 9th June 2014. On the Web: <http://www.palass.org/> ISSN: 0954-9900 Newsletter 85 2 Editorial The role of Newsletter Reporter is becoming part of the portfolio of responsibilities of the PalAss Publicity Officer, which is Liam Herringshaw’s new post on Council. This reflects a broader re-organization of posts on Council that are aimed at enhancing the efforts of the Association. Council now includes the posts of Education Officer and Outreach Officer, who will, along with the Publicity Officer, develop strategies to engage with different target audiences. The Association has done what it can to stay abreast of developments in social media, through the establishment of the Palass Twitter Feed (@ThePalAss), the development of Palaeontology [online] and the work of Palaeocast, which is a project that has received support from the Association. Progressive Palaeontology has more or less migrated to Facebook. Such methods of delivery have overtaken the Newsletter, the News side-boxes on the Pal Ass website and … However, our real asset in the publicity sphere is you, the members. As palaeontologists, we hold the subject-specific knowledge and the links among the different spheres of knowledge in the other sciences that contribute to our understanding of the history of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Climate Action Agenda
    THE Women’s EARTH AND CLIMATE ActION NEtwORK IS PROUD TO PRESENT THE 2014–2015 WOMEN’S CLIMATE ACTION AGENDA WOMEN’S CLIMATE ActION AgENDA WOMEN OF THE WORLD: URGE OUR LEADERS TO HALT GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE; DEMAND A JUST AND NECESSARY TRANSITION TO GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY AND; PRESENT A PLAN FOR OUR COLLEctIVE FUTURE. AUTHORED BY MEMBERS AND ALLIES OF THE Women’s EARTH AND CLIMATE ActION NEtwORK WOMEN ARE LIVING ON THE FRONT LINES OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND ARE READY TO BE ACTIVE PARTNERS IN DEALING WITH CLIMATE CHANGE. IF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY IS SERIOUS ABOUT ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE, IT MUST RECOGNIZE WOMEN AS A FUNDAMENTAL PART OF THE CLIMATE SOLUTION. PROFESSOR WANGARI MAATHAI NOBEL PEACE PRIZE LAUREATE 1940-2011 P rinted on recycled paper. on recycled rinted WECAN WOMEN’S CLIMATE ACTION AGENDA 2 Women’s Climate Action Agenda The views and statements in the Women’s Climate Action Agenda (WCAA) are those of WECAN’s Core Team, Members, and Allies. The views and state- ments were derived from the collective efforts of participants of the 2013 International Women’s Earth and Climate Summit, held in New York. The WCAA does not necessarily reflect the views of all summit participants. LEAD AUTHORS Osprey Orielle Lake, Claire Greensfelder and Elaine Colligan WECAN Women’s Climate Action Agenda © Women’s Earth and Climate Caucus and eraGlobal Alliance RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD Wagner_ClimateShock_FINAL.indd 3 12/30/14 8:32 AM Copyright © 2015 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW press.princeton.edu All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wagner, Gernot, 1980– Climate shock : the economic consequences of a hotter planet / Gernot Wagner and Martin L. Weitzman. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-15947-8 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Climatic changes— Economic aspects. I. Weitzman, Martin L., 1942– II. Title. QC903.W34 2015 363.738’74—dc23 2014028540 British Library Cataloging- in- Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Sabon Next LT Pro, DINPro Printed on acid- free paper. ∞ Printed in the United States of America 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Wagner_ClimateShock_FINAL.indd 4 12/30/14 8:32 AM Contents Preface: Pop Quiz ix Chapter 1. 911 1 Chapter 2. 411 30 Chapter 3. Fat Tails 48 Chapter 4. Willful Blindness 80 Chapter 5. Bailing Out the Planet 92 Chapter 6. 007 116 Chapter 7. What You Can Do 128 Epilogue: A Different Kind of Optimism 148 Acknowledgments 153 Notes 155 Bibliography 207 Index 243 Wagner_ClimateShock_FINAL.indd 7 12/30/14 8:32 AM Notes PREFACE: POP QUIZ Page ix— Two quick questions: Princeton’s Robert Socolow has started many a presentation with a version of this quiz, asking audiences whether they consider climate change “an urgent matter” and fos- sil fuels “hard to displace.” He groups the resulting views into four broad buckets, reproduced here with permission, and with slight modifications: Is getting the world off fossil fuels difficult? No Yes No A low- carbon world Perhaps most of the unmotivated by general public, and climate parts of the energy Is climate considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • 14.6 Books MH
    Vol 447|14 June 2007 BOOKS & ARTS Dirt cheap soil Precious few societies have taken care of their most fundamental resource. Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations By David R. Montgomery University of California Press: 2007. 295 pp. $24.95, £15.95 Eric A. Davidson B. FORSTER/GETTY IMAGES B. FORSTER/GETTY If everyday expressions offer clues to what we value, then the common use of ‘dirt-cheap’ to describe anything inexpensive speaks poorly of our appreciation for soil. Like water and air, soil is not efficiently traded and priced in the marketplace, and yet we could not live without it. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that food security and human well- being depend on fertile soil. That expression implies admiration for the intelligence of rocket scientists, and similar praise is due to Earth scientist David Montgomery, whose new book insightfully chronicles the rise of agricul- tural technology and the concomitant fall of soil depth just about everywhere in the world, from prehistoric to modern times. The topic could not be more timely, as recent large-scale Dust in the wind: civilizations collapse when their soil runs out. expansion of maize (corn) in the United States and sugar cane in Brazil for biofuel produc- Not all is gloomy. A precious few exam- but Montgomery argues that soil has become tion signals a new era of competition between ples of good soil management are described. a scarce resource. More than a history lesson the energy and food sectors for the globally Montgomery also cites philosophers, agrono- of the legacies of past civilizations, the book finite resource of arable land and the remain- mists, and soil scientists from ancient Greece raises a critical concern for modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem CO2 Starvation and Terrestrial Silicate Weathering: Mechanisms and Global-Scale Quantification During the Late Miocene
    Journal of Ecology 2012, 100, 31–41 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01905.x CENTENARY SYMPOSIUM SPECIAL FEATURE Ecosystem CO2 starvation and terrestrial silicate weathering: mechanisms and global-scale quantification during the late Miocene David J. Beerling1*, Lyla L. Taylor1, Catherine D. C. Bradshaw2, Daniel J. Lunt2, Paul J. Valdes2, Steven A. Banwart3, Mark Pagani4 and Jonathan R. Leake1 1Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK; 2School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK; 3Cell-Mineral Research Centre, Kroto Research Institute, Univer- sity of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 7HQ, UK; and 4Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA Summary 1. The relative constancy of the lower limit on Earth’s atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]a) during major tectonic episodes over the final 24 million years (Ma) of the Cenozoic is surprising because they are expected to draw-down [CO2]a by enhancing chemical weathering and carbonate deposition on the seafloor. That [CO2]a did not drop to extremely low values suggests the existence of feedback mechanisms that slow silicate weathering as [CO2]a declines. One proposed mechanism is a negative feedback mediated through CO2 starvation of land plants in active orogenic regions compromising the efficiency of the primary carboxylating enzyme in C3 plants (Rubisco) and dimin- ishing productivity and terrestrial weathering. 2. The CO2 starvation hypothesis is developed further by identifying four key related mechanisms:
    [Show full text]
  • Plants As a Force of Nature the Emerald Planet: How Plants Changed Earth's History by David Beerling
    TREE-888; No of Pages 2 ART CLE N PRESS Update Cel I Book Review Plants as a force of nature The Emerald Planet: How Plants Changed Earth's History by David Beerling. Oxford University Press, 2007. $29.95 (307 pages) ISBN 978-0-19-280602-4 William A. DiMichele Department of Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20560, USA Many of the chapters present syntheses quite different Just how exciting is it to be a scientist? from those we learned in class or commonly encounter in Colleagues and I occasionally talk about text books. Take the origin of leaves (chapter 2). Beerling whether we would recommend this career argues that large, planate leaves could not exist in an to our children in light of the modern atmosphere high in CO2. High levels of this gas suppress pressures on scholarly pursuit and the the abundance of stomata, thus reducing the ability of a evaluation thereof [1] - about the hours planate surface to stay cool by the transpiration of water spent writing and answering emails, vapor to the atmosphere as the leaf is heated by sunlight. applying for grants, serving on commit- Remarkably, the genetic machinery that underlies leaf tees. But, occasionally, we do get that development is almost the same in all vascular plants - feeling of being stars in our own movie. this is true even for lineages that separated in the Early A paleobotanical scene: an SUV sweeps down a steep ramp Devonian, long before planate leaves appeared - implying into an active coal pit. The car does a 180 in a cloud of dust.
    [Show full text]
  • Tipping Points for Abrupt Climate Change the Shadow That Haunts Climate Policy IGSD/INECE∗ Climate Briefing Note: 27 October 2008
    Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development e Montreal Tipping Points for Abrupt Climate Change The Shadow That Haunts Climate Policy IGSD/INECE∗ Climate Briefing Note: 27 October 2008 The paleoclimate records show that past climate changes have included both steady, linear changes as well as abrupt, non-linear changes, where small increases in global warming produced large and irreversible impacts once tipping points were passed. Climate scientists now warn that anthropogenic emissions are pushing the planet’s climate system toward such tipping points sooner than previously expected, and that impacts could be catastrophic. Among potential impacts of passing climate tipping points are the disappearance of Arctic summer sea ice, disintegration of the Greenland Ice Sheet, collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, shutdown of the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation, and dieback of Amazonian and boreal forests.1 The catastrophic impacts from these events would include many meters of sea level rise, water shortages, megadroughts, and famine, and could lead to political instability and resource wars.2 Other impacts include release of methane and other global warming gases from permafrost and ocean hydrates, which could set off runaway feedbacks. In a recent study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, V. Ramanathan and Y. Feng from Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, calculate that greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions as of 2005 have committed the planet to warming of “2.4˚C above the preindustrial surface temperatures,”3 which is within the range of predicted tipping points. See Figure. “Probability distribution for the committed warming by GHG between 1750 and 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 163/2
    THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF GLASGOW Registered Scottish Charity No. SC007013 President: Dr. Neil Clark www.geologyglasgow.org.uk December 2020 163/2 The discovery of a new fossil bird skull in 2018 dates to the very end of the Cretaceous Period—the final 700 thousand years of the Age of Dinosaurs. It gives us an important glimpse of how birds looked 66.7 million years ago, during the narrow interval of time just before a giant asteroid struck the Earth. Come online on the 10th December to hear Daniel Field’s talk on the ‘Wonderchicken’ In this newsletter: • Lecture details for December, January and Febrary 2021 • AGM Information 1 Lecture Programme 2020-21 (Session 163) This session continues to be different. The Covid-19 pandemic means we have to organise our lectures on-line. We aim to keep to the usual dates of the second Thursdays of each month. The programme is organised for the next few months, but is subject to change. All lectures this session will be held online using Zoom. Invites will be emailed to members a few days prior to the meeting. The lectures will commence at 7.30 pm. Lectures will last about an hour plus there will be time afterwards for questions and a vote of thanks. If you have access to an email address but have not given it to the Society and wish to view these lectures please contact [email protected] The speakers may grant permission for the lecture to be recorded. In these cases it will be posted on Youtube and a link emailed to members.
    [Show full text]