DOCSLIB.ORG

San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Management Plan Final Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Management Plan Final Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Management Plan Final Environmental Assessment Forest Service Angeles National Forest Los Angeles County, California April 2018 For More Information Contact: Rachel Smith Angeles National Forest 701 N. Santa Anita Ave. Arcadia, CA 91006 Phone: (626) 574-5215 Fax: (626) 574-5235 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.htmland at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Final Environmental Assessment Contents Chapter 1. Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 Management Direction ........................................................................................................ 1 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 2 Transportation and Access ................................................................................................... 3 Sustainable Recreation ........................................................................................................ 3 Heritage Resources .............................................................................................................. 4 Biological Resources ........................................................................................................... 4 Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................... 4 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 4 Scoping ............................................................................................................................... 5 Draft EA Opportunity for Public Comment.......................................................................... 6 Tribal Consultation ................................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 2. Proposed Action and Alternative Development ........................................................ 11 Monument Planning Location ............................................................................................... 11 Alternatives Development ..................................................................................................... 13 Alternatives Analyzed in Detail ............................................................................................ 13 Alternative 1 ..................................................................................................................... 13 Alternative 2 ..................................................................................................................... 13 Alternative 3 ..................................................................................................................... 26 Alternatives Considered, but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis from Scoping ................. 39 Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ......................................... 40 Analysis Area ....................................................................................................................... 40 Analysis Assumptions ........................................................................................................... 40 Heritage Resources ............................................................................................................... 41 Affected Environment ....................................................................................................... 41 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................ 46 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................ 49 Affected Environment ....................................................................................................... 49 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................ 62 Recreation ............................................................................................................................ 66 Affected Environment ....................................................................................................... 66 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................ 78 Scenery ................................................................................................................................. 85 Affected Environment ....................................................................................................... 85 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................ 90 Socioeconomics .................................................................................................................... 92 Affected Environment ....................................................................................................... 92 Environmental Consequences ............................................................................................ 96 Environmental Justice ........................................................................................................... 99 Affected Environment ....................................................................................................... 99 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 102 Mineral Resources .............................................................................................................. 104 Affected Environment ..................................................................................................... 104 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 106 Angeles National Forest iii San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Final Environmental Assessment Aquatic Wildlife Species .................................................................................................... 109 Affected Environment ..................................................................................................... 109 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 111 Terrestrial Wildlife Species ................................................................................................. 119 Affected Environment ..................................................................................................... 119 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 127 Botanical Resources ............................................................................................................ 132 Affected Environment ..................................................................................................... 132 Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 142 Transportation ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Clara River Conservancy Sespe Cienega Restoration and Pubilc Access Project
    Santa Clara River Conservancy Sespe Cienega Restoration and Pubilc Access Project About Santa Clara River Conservancy Vision Vision The Santa Clara River Conservancy (SCRC) is a Public Access non-profit, collaborative land trust focusing on restoring The surrounding communities are currently isolated native habitat to one of California’s most dynamic water- from the river and have asked for increased public sheds. SCRC encourages the community to join the access to the river for some time. SCRC and organization’s mission through various outreach, educa- CDFW hope to address some of that demand in tion, recreation events, activities, and volunteer efforts. the envisioned public access improvements on this Project Description property. The plans for public access improve- ments will include design of interpretative displays The goal of this planning effort at Sespe Cienega is to and walking trails that will allow for public access develop working plans to restore riparian and wetland to and along the Santa Clara River, ultimately habitats and natural river function to this property under increasing the public access footprint along the permanent protection by CDFW, and to provide public Santa Clara River that is the Santa Clara River access to the river for the communities of Fillmore, Santa Parkway vision. Paula, and Piru. Restoring the river to its natural and historical functions has additional benefits to the surrounding area by providing a space for sustainable Restoration agriculture, land conservation, and climate resilience. The SCRC, in coordination with UCSB, CDFW, and Still planning process will be a joint effort among the Santa Water Sciences will develop working plans to Clara River Conservancy (SCRC), the California Depart- guide restoration of riparian and wetland habitats ment of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and the University of and natural river function on the property to its California, Santa Barbara (UCSB).
    [Show full text]
  • Three Chumash-Style Pictograph Sites in Fernandeño Territory
    THREE CHUMASH-STYLE PICTOGRAPH SITES IN FERNANDEÑO TERRITORY ALBERT KNIGHT SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY There are three significant archaeology sites in the eastern Simi Hills that have an elaborate polychrome pictograph component. Numerous additional small loci of rock art and major midden deposits that are rich in artifacts also characterize these three sites. One of these sites, the “Burro Flats” site, has the most colorful, elaborate, and well-preserved pictographs in the region south of the Santa Clara River and west of the Los Angeles Basin and the San Fernando Valley. Almost all other painted rock art in this region consists of red-only paintings. During the pre-contact era, the eastern Simi Hills/west San Fernando Valley area was inhabited by a mix of Eastern Coastal Chumash and Fernandeño. The style of the paintings at the three sites (CA-VEN-1072, VEN-149, and LAN-357) is clearly the same as that found in Chumash territory. If the quantity and the quality of rock art are good indicators, then it is probable that these three sites were some of the most important ceremonial sites for the region. An examination of these sites has the potential to help us better understand this area of cultural interaction. This article discusses the polychrome rock art at the Burro Flats site (VEN-1072), the Lake Manor site (VEN-148/149), and the Chatsworth site (LAN-357). All three of these sites are located in rock shelters in the eastern Simi Hills. The Simi Hills are mostly located in southeast Ventura County, although the eastern end is in Los Angeles County (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Disasters, Past and Impending, in the Eastern San Gabriel
    April 18, 2009 Field Trip #4: Natural Hazards, Past and Impending, in the Eastern San Gabriel Mountains Jonathan A. Nourse Department of Geological Sciences California State Polytechnic University 3801 West Temple Avenue Pomona, CA 91768 Introduction The eastern San Gabriel Mountains present a spectacular outdoor laboratory for studying the causes and consequences of natural hazards that include earthquakes, floods, landslides, and fires. Since 1991 I have utilized the San Antonio Canyon region as a convenient place to educate Cal Poly Pomona students enrolled in my Natural Disasters, Engineering Geology, Structural Geology, Tectonics, Groundwater Geology and Optical Mineralogy courses. The area has also provided world-class field trip sites for the Geological Society of America, the Thomas W. Dibblee Foundation and NAGT. This guidebook includes excerpts from several previous field trip guides for which I have been principle or contributing author (Nourse, et al., 1998; Trent and Nourse, 2001; Trent et al., 2001, Nourse, 2003). The oblique aerial view of Figure 1 highlights the San Gabriel Mountains block, uplifted along the Sierra Madre-Cucamonga frontal thrust system and dissected by left-lateral and right-lateral strike slip faults. Our plan for today is to begin the trip at San Antonio Dam near the intersection of the Cucamonga, San Jose and San Antonio Canyon faults. Working our way up the Mt. Baldy Road, we shall view field evidence of floods, landslides and debris flows that have resulted from interplay between steep topography, severe weather conditions, and major earthquakes. Effects of the devastating fire of 2003 are also prominent. We will discuss impacts of the floods of 1938, 1969, and 2005 on human structures such as dams, roads and buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Debris Flow Erosion in the San Gabriel Mountains, CA
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE POST-FIRE DEBRIS FLOW EROSION IN THE SAN GABRIEL MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA: EVIDENCE FROM THE STATION FIRE, 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science in Geology By Martha M. Ahlstrom August, 2013 The thesis of Martha M. Ahlstrom is approved: _________________________________ ________________ Dr. Matthew d'Alessio Date _________________________________ ________________ Dr. Julie Laity Date _________________________________ ________________ Dr. Richard Heermance, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Acknowledgments I most heartily thank Dr. Richard Heermance for his exceptional guidance, advice, patience, knowledge, support, and willingness in allowing me to conduct a study on debris flows. My other committee members, Dr. Julie Laity and Dr. Matthew d’Alessio, made heroic efforts in editing my thesis. I appreciate all their efforts to ensure the scientific integrity of this project. I also thank all the professors in the CSUN Geological Sciences Department for their support. I especially thank Dr. Vicki Pedone for her guidance and encouragement. Mrs. Marilyn Hanna and the Geological Sciences Scholarship Committee funded this thesis project. I am grateful for their support, grants, and scholarships. This project would have not been completed in such a timely manner without the awesome field assistants who trekked all over the San Gabriel Mountains to help conduct the field work. My field assistants included CSUN undergraduate geology students, CSUN graduate students, Morning Star Christian Academy students, LA Valley College students, and family members. I value all their time and efforts. I thank all my family members for their patience, graciousness, and support while I completed this project.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Sespe Creek Comprehensive Wild and Scenic River Management Plan, Los Padres National Forest
    Comprehensive River United States Department of Management Plan Agriculture Forest Service Sespe Creek Pacific Southwest Region R5-MB-038 Los Padres National Forest November 2003 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Description of River Setting and Resource Values .................................................................................... 4 Regional River Setting ............................................................................................................................ 4 Free-flowing values and impacts ............................................................................................................. 4 Outstandingly
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Wilderness
    INTERNATIONAL Journal of Wilderness DECEMBER 2005 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3 FEATURES SCIENCE AND RESEARCH 3 Is Eastern Wilderness ”Real”? PERSPECTIVES FROM THE ALDO LEOPOLD WILDERNESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE BY REBECCA ORESKES 30 Social and Institutional Influences on SOUL OF THE WILDERNESS Wilderness Fire Stewardship 4 Florida Wilderness BY KATIE KNOTEK Working with Traditional Tools after a Hurricane BY SUSAN JENKINS 31 Wilderness In Whose Backyard? BY GARY T. GREEN, MICHAEL A. TARRANT, UTTIYO STEWARDSHIP RAYCHAUDHURI, and YANGJIAN ZHANG 7 A Truly National Wilderness Preservation System BY DOUGLAS W. SCOTT EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION 39 Changes in the Aftermath of Natural Disasters 13 Keeping the Wild in Wilderness When Is Too Much Change Unacceptable to Visitors? Minimizing Nonconforming Uses in the National Wilderness Preservation System BY JOSEPH FLOOD and CRAIG COLISTRA BY GEORGE NICKAS and KEVIN PROESCHOLDT 19 Developing Wilderness Indicators on the INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES White Mountain National Forest 42 Wilderness Conservation in a Biodiversity Hotspot BY DAVE NEELY BY RUSSELL A. MITTERMEIER, FRANK HAWKINS, SERGE RAJAOBELINA, and OLIVIER LANGRAND 22 Understanding the Cultural, Existence, and Bequest Values of Wilderness BY RUDY M. SCHUSTER, H. KEN CORDELL, and WILDERNESS DIGEST BRAD PHILLIPS 46 Announcements and Wilderness Calendar 26 8th World Wilderness Congress Generates Book Review Conservation Results 48 How Should America’s Wilderness Be Managed? BY VANCE G. MARTIN edited by Stuart A. Kallen REVIEWED BY JOHN SHULTIS FRONT COVER The magnificent El Carmen escaprment, one of the the “sky islands” of Coahuilo, Mexico. Photo by Patricio Robles Gil/Sierra Madre. INSET Ancient grain grinding site, Maderas del Carmen, Coahuilo, Mexico. Photo by Vance G.
    [Show full text]
  • Consensus Comments on the San Gabriel National Monument Plan and Draft Environmental Analysis (October 31, 2016)
    SAN GABRIEL MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE Comments to the Angeles National Forest Contents San Gabriel Mountains Community Collaborative Unified Comments (August 11, 2015) .................................................................................... 2 San Gabriel Mountains Community Collaborative Consensus Comments on the San Gabriel National Monument Plan and Draft Environmental Analysis (October 31, 2016) .................................................................. 11 Press Release on Consensus Comments (November 2, 2016)............... 60 San Gabriel Mountains Community Collaborative Unified Comments August 11, 2015 Angeles National Forest ATTN: Justin Seastrand 701 North Santa Anita Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 Dear Mr. Seastrand, The San Gabriel Mountains Community Collaborative (SGMCC) is pleased to provide to the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) our joint comments regarding the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument (Monument) “Need to Change” Analysis. The SGMCC consists of approximately 45 members representing a full range of interests (academic, business, civil rights, community, conservancies, cultural, environmental, environmental justice, ethnic diversity, education, youth, state and local government, Native American, public safety, recreation, special use permit holders, land lease holders, transportation, utilities, and water rights holders) associated with the Monument. The mission of the SGMCC is to: “Represent the general public by integrating diverse perspectives to identify, analyze, prioritize and advocate
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Building Descriptions and Climate Zones
    Appendix D Building Descriptions and Climate Zones APPENDIX D: Building Descriptions The purpose of the Building Descriptions is to assist the user in selecting an appropriate type of building when using the Air Conditioning estimating tools. The selected building type should be the one that most closely matches the actual project. These summaries provide the user with the inputs for the typical buildings. Minor variations from these inputs will occur based on differences in building vintage and climate zone. The Building Descriptions are referenced from the 2004-2005 Database for Energy Efficiency Resources (DEER) Update Study. It should be noted that the user is required to provide certain inputs for the user’s specific building (e.g. actual conditioned area, city, operating hours, economy cycle, new AC system and new AC system efficiency). The remaining inputs are approximations of the building and are deemed acceptable to the user. If none of the typical building models are determined to be a fair approximation then the user has the option to use the Custom Building approach. The Custom Building option instructs the user how to initiate the Engage Software. The Engage Software is a stand-alone, DOE2 based modeling program. July 16, 2013 D-1 Version 5.0 Prototype Source Activity Area Type Area % Area Simulation Model Notes 1. Assembly DEER Auditorium 33,235 97.8 Thermal Zoning: One zone per activity area. Office 765 2.2 Total 34,000 Model Configuration: Matches 1994 DEER prototype HVAC Systems: The prototype uses Rooftop DX systems, which are changed to Rooftop HP systems for the heat pump efficiency measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study U.S
    National Park Service Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study U.S. Department of the Interior Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter #4 • Spring 2015 Oat Mountain area in the Santa Susana Mountains. Photo: Steve Matsuda. See Page 2 for Draft Special Resource Study & Environmental Public Meeting Assessment Report Available for Review Schedule! Dear Friends, About the National Park Service The National Park Service preserves It is with great pleasure that the National Park Service (NPS) offers the Rim of unimpaired the natural and cultural the Valley Draft Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment to you resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, for review and comment. This newsletter contains the executive summary of education, and inspiration of this and the draft study report and information about how to submit comments and future generations. The NPS cooperates with partners to extend the benefits participate in public meetings to learn more about the draft study report. of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation The NPS initiated this special resource study in 2010 and published preliminary throughout this country and the world. management alternatives in late 2012. This study report reflects your initial involvement and input into the planning process. The study alternatives and Newsletter Contents their concepts reflect your concerns and ideas. How to Obtain a Copy of the Draft Report ......................... 2 The full draft report is posted on the study website at: http://www.nps.gov/ How to Provide Comments ............. 2 pwro/rimofthevalley, and limited printed copies are available from the National Public Meeting Schedule ................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.12 Hydrology and Water Quality
    3.12 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section describes the drainage features, stormwater quality, flooding hazards, and flood-protection improvements within the City’s Planning Area. Regulatory agencies governing stormwater quality and flooding hazards are also discussed. The City’s Planning Area is comprised of the City’s boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is outside the City’s boundaries and adopted SOI. Together the City and County Planning Areas comprise the OVOV Planning Area. With implementation of the proposed General Plan goals, objectives, and policies potential impacts on hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. EXISTING CONDITIONS Surface Water Drainage Patterns within City’s Planning Area Surface water drainage patterns are dependent on topography, the amount and location of impervious surfaces, and the type of flood control that is located in an area. The size, or magnitude, of a flood is described by a term called a “recurrence interval.” By studying a long period of flow record for a stream, hydrologists estimate the size of a flood that would have a likelihood of occurring during various intervals. For example, a five-year flood event would occur, on the average, once every five years (and would have a 20 percent chance of occurring in any one year). Although a 100-year flood event is expected to happen only once in a century, there is a 1 percent chance that a flood of that size could happen during any year.
    [Show full text]