DOCSLIB.ORG

Gun-Involved Violence Elimination) Initiative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE MAGAZINE OF THE CENTER FOR EVIDENCE-BASED CRIME POLICY, GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY Translational FALL 2014 Criminology Promoting knowledge exchange to shape criminal justice research, practice, and policy Inside this issue… Around the CEBCP Modeling Successful Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships The St. Louis Public Safety Partnership Realizing the Potential of Technology for Policing Integrating Evidence to Stop Shootings The CEBCP 2014 Award Winners Reflections on the Value of Evidence-Based Practices in Policing The Distinguished Achievement Award in Evidence-Based Crime Policy Practical Research to Address School Safety Developing and Sustaining an International Researcher-Practitioner Partnership Translating Research through the Documentary Film Lost for Life Where Social Science Goes Wrong CEBCP Mission Statement The Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy (CEBCP), housed within the Department of Criminology, Law and Society at George Mason University, seeks to make scientific research a key component in decisions about crime and justice policies by advancing rigorous studies in criminal justice and criminology through research–practice collaborations and proactively serving as an informational link to practitioners and the policy community. Translational Criminology advances this mission by illustrating examples of how research is converted into criminal justice practice. Staff Executive Director: David Weisburd Director: Cynthia Lum Deputy Director: Charlotte Gill Fellows: James Bueermann, Christopher Koper, Stephen Mastrofski, Linda Merola, Laurie Robinson, James Translational Willis, Nigel Waters, Sue-Ming Yang Research Assistants: Breanne Cave, Julie Grieco, Stephen Happeny, William Johnson, Matthew Nelson, Jordan Criminology FALL 2014 Nichols, Sang Jun Park, Zoe Vitter, Heather Vovak, Alese Wooditch, Xiaoyun Wu Promoting knowledge exchange to shape criminal justice research, Executive Assistant and Office Manager:Naida Kuruvilla practice, and policy Fulbright Visiting Scholars: Richard Adams (Police From the Directors ............................................1 Scotland), Victoria Garnett (Metropolitan Police Service, London) Around the CEBCP ...........................................2 Affiliated Scholars: Elizabeth Groff (Temple University), Julie Hibdon (Southern Illinois University), Joshua Modeling Successful Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships: Hinkle (Georgia State University), Brian Lawton The International Association of Chiefs of Police (CUNY, John Jay), Travis Taniguchi (The Police Research Advisory Committee ..................................4 Foundation), Cody Telep (Arizona State University) The St. Louis Public Safety Partnership ...........................6 Research Programs Crime and Place Realizing the Potential of Technology for Policing ...................9 Evidence-Based Policing Integrating Evidence to Stop Shootings: New York’s GIVE Systematic Reviews Criminal Justice Policy (Gun-Involved Violence Elimination) Initiative ......................11 The CEBCP 2014 Award Winners ...............................14 Advisory Board Chair: Peter Neyroud, Cambridge University Looking Forward, Looking Back: Reflections on the Value Robert Boruch, University of Pennsylvania of Evidence-Based Practices in Policing..........................16 Gerben Bruinsma, Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement The Distinguished Achievement Award James Bueermann, The Police Foundation in Evidence-Based Crime Policy ................................18 Cathy Lanier, Metropolitan Police Department, Washington, D.C. Practical Research to Address School Safety: Jerry Lee, Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, University The Secret Service-U.S. Department of Education of Pennsylvania Safe Schools Initiative ........................................20 Friedrich Lösel, Emeritus, Cambridge University Bernard Melekian, Former Director of the Office Developing and Sustaining an International of Community Oriented Policing Services Researcher-Practitioner Partnership .............................23 Daniel Nagin, Carnegie Mellon University Kathleen O’Toole, Seattle Police Department Juvenile Lifers: Translating Research through the Documentary Carol Petrie, DSG Inc. Film Lost for Life ............................................25 Lawrence Sherman, University of Maryland and Cambridge University Where Social Science Goes Wrong..............................28 Darrel Stephens, Major City Chiefs Association CONTACT US Christy Visher, University of Delaware Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy Website: www.cebcp.org Hubert Williams (retired), The Police Foundation George Mason University Email: [email protected] Research Hall, Rooms 310-318 Twitter: @cebcp Photos by Alexis Glenn and Evan Cantwell 4400 University Drive, MS 6D12 YouTube: clsmason Fairfax, VA 22030 FROM THE DIRECTORS e want to begin by thanking everyone who participated Governor of New York, in our successful symposium this past June. With our and William Modzeleski, partners from the Inter-American Development Bank, formerly of the U.S. asW well as panelists who gave of their time and expertise, the 2014 Department of Education, and Anthony Petrosino and his colleagues CEBCP-IDB symposium covered a wide array of challenging issues at WestEd to continue these conversations in this issue. Buck in evidence-based crime policy including school safety, gun violence, discusses the importance of funding replications of studies to technology and law enforcement, crime analysis, community crime strengthen what we think we may know about justice programs and prevention, policing and deterrence, and the funding of science in practices. Abt writes about New York State’s GIVE (Gun-Involved Promoting knowledge exchange to shape criminal justice research, crime policy. We would especially like to thank our keynote speakers, Violence Elimination) Initiative and the role that states can play in practice, and policy Daniel Ortega of the Development Bank of Latin America (CAF) guiding evidence-based practices. And Modzeleski, Petrosino, and Daniel Nagin of Carnegie Mellon University, who capped off Guckenburg, and Fronius lend their thoughts on the role of research each day with provocative ideas for the future. in highly profiled and political issues such as school safety and Our next symposium takes place overseas, in partnership with the violence. Their expertise reflects a strong theme in the CEBCP—to Scottish Institute for Policing Research (SIPR). This event builds continue to question what is evidence-based crime policy, and what upon our 2013 symposium with SIPR, focusing on knowledge does it mean for science to impact justice-related decision making. exchange, translation, and research in policing. Supported by the Finally, we are pleased to present our readers with reflections from Scottish Police College and the Scottish government, we look two of our award winners, Jeremy Travis and Clark Kimerer. Travis’s forward to exchanging ideas with our colleagues in Tulliallan and thought-provoking speech that he gave upon accepting the Distin- Edinburgh, Scotland. Back in the United States, we invite everyone guished Achievement Award in Evidence-Based Crime Policy reflects to join us for our next Congressional Briefing on school safety and his years of experience in negotiating and fostering a relationship school violence in partnership with our colleagues at WestEd, between science and criminal justice practice. Kimerer’s Hall of Fame tentatively scheduled for February 2015. statement shows how both critical and careful thought as well as All these events reflect one of the CEBCP’s core values: engaging open-mindedness are key in developing leadership in evidence-based in strong partnerships with a variety of researchers, practitioners, and policy. Their wise words provide guidance to leaders who confront policy makers from around the globe. In this issue of Translational challenges every day about using, implementing, and translating Criminology, we highlight the importance of partnerships in both research in practice. generating research evidence and translating knowledge to practice. We hope you will continue to enjoy Translational Criminology as Ed Davis and Laurie Robinson discuss the IACP’s Research Advisory much as we enjoy creating it. We also invite scholars, practitioners, Committee as a model for institutionalizing police-researcher and policy makers to collaborate for future submissions. partnerships. Richard Rosenfeld, Geoff Alpert, and Peter Martin focus on specific partnerships in policing in the United States and David Weisburd, Executive Director Australia and what makes them successful. Rosenfeld reflects on his Cynthia Lum, Director work with the St. Louis Police Department and offers advice to younger scholars seeking to work with practitioners. Alpert and Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy Martin discuss the challenges and possibilities of international George Mason University relationships. And Christopher Koper, Cynthia Lum, and James Willis provide results from a partnership with two police agencies to evaluate the impact of technology on policing. During the symposium, we also had lively discussion and debate about the role of science in policy and practice. Keeping with this theme, we asked three of the symposium’s speakers, Stuart Buck from the Arnold Foundation, Thomas Abt from the Office of the Fall 2014 | TRANSLATIONAL CRIMINOLOGY 1 Around the CEBCP The Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy (CEBCP) is housed within the Depart-
Recommended publications
  • Download JULY 1933.Pdf

    Download JULY 1933.Pdf

    lituttfll tatf.a 1!lurfau nf ]Utlflittgatinu 3Jn4u 1Ellgar llInunrr. itrrrtor l'lali4iugfnu. 13. or . ., " . There is toQ..ay a -most encouraging .. indication of increased publ ic in­ terest in crlme probŅems . Thi s interest lS,being manifested by civic groups, -'institutes of goyhrnment, the press, and organizations of ' different types, as • well as more frequent activņty on the part.oŇ individual citizens . This is a , reflection of a condition precedent 'to the fuňlreʼnliŊation of the American ,.' people of their responsibiU ty in connectibJ? 'wltlf' such problems . We, the law enforcement officials and agencies of the,natŋon, qan and should exert every effort to stimulate the interest now being shown and to direct this interest ' : toward the cotisummati6n of the desired obj ective, namely, a recognition of the fact that the law enfotceŌent offigers are thō nati9n 's peace-time soldiers always on actŎve duty aŏq tpat tŐe citiőens,of the.countrY are allies of these officers . Certainly, no citizhn, in time of war or national danger, would be worthy of his trust if he·concealed information of value to our armed forces, or if he concealed information concerning the activities or whereabouts of enemy spies. Obviously, the same responsioility exists in the warfare against crime and criminal s. The criminal is a public enemy., CQmfort, solace , and aid are' given this enemy when a·citizen does'not promptly report the commission of a crime, or the' whereabouts and activity 'of violator or a fugitive . The responsibil ity of course goes even further, and'extends to the duty of serving as a witness or as a juror, without fear or favor.
  • Capital Punishment

    Capital Punishment

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY S~NATOR BILL LOCKYER, CHAIRMAN Special Hearing on THE PROCESS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT MARCH 19, 1985 111137 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated l' in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily 1'1 represent the official position or pOlicies of the National !l1stitute of ........ Justice . ....... ...... ....... r p. 0:::«z -<C Z to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). ~~ Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ [J,J '--J.U sion of the copyright owner. 0:= oe= O~ ::J ::><C l­ -:>J: CI}:C « e= to -I zC: t:f) Cl)CrJ CO Ql (/) offi r: 0"1,........ ?Z ..... "'-I .... &) Q;:) lad .. C<Q 0 -c.9 UJr 0"1 'f:" fa Z ,........ ~ [J,J UJ~ C» U as r -I (---4U .., Q :: O;J :r: I""'l (3)""'" « (-0_ -I I'!~ IG U U >- ;:J -z -0"" ~~ 0:: < 2:-1 U ~ ~ 0 0:= <» « ::Ed ,..J ~ 0 o 00 e- ~ ~ 0 el) -I--- '-U~ « uO:=o U LLll­ :ct: (-<C ~~ ZllJ«Z W{/) ~ en U SPECIAL HEARING ON THE PROCESS OF CAPITAL PUNISFlMENl' CASES March 19, 1985 Senate Judiciary Committee Bill Lockyer, Chairman Ed Davis Nicholas C. Pettis Jolm Doolittle Robert Presley Barry Keene Art Torres Mil ton Marks Diane Watson Senate Judiciary Ccmnittee Tuesday, March 19, 1985 1 :30 p.m., Roan 4203 AGENDA: TI1E PROCESS OF A CAPITAL PUNISHMENT CASE 1 .
  • Floyd Kansas City Massacre

    Floyd Kansas City Massacre

    92. I I V I --->------ # CHARLES PRETTYBOY" FLOYD KANSAS CITYMASSACRE * 2-M115 SECTION 36 7 " _* ""7 Y" &#39;__W ~_77J &#39;_ &#39; &#39;:; -:7-2 ....:-_:1_~ -=1--...._, , _, .....___ .,-.-....._._....,.,~=-._..------}-..-_&#39;.;-- &#39; --. " 0 -7 I I - L i -- I T.1- -- - - .- . - ....-.. -.4 .-;.-_.... ...D_92 _ .,.- . CHARLES PRETTYBOY" FLOYD~ FRANK msu _ VERNE MILLER % 4-¢n1-L - -- -- ADAM RICHETTI _ KANSAS CITY MASSACRE L SUE>_1¬C6----_.------._..-_-___-_-.--. - File nc1mI&#39;5¬R_.é " V seczzsion numE>e*-:né1hi.____ I %RiALS @0229-92L pA§@s_I_=i__ pxées R¬L¬A56O p2-*,_¬3¬&#39;5 waténbenoQ ___ exemp*@i0n s! useo_b]_D__b_;_ &#39; _ _ii - . ,;==yv;:;L§ I 2, Hi--~ - . &#39; _~_. .&#39; _.: _ - J .._ -.*&#39;.&#39;- -c- _. - - .,hh - I 92 -. ._1 1 ..__-->,., &#39;=- .. > _->- > - , . ._ 1; -1; , &#39;-_ . _ -&#39;. " -- ¢ - .. -&#39; - -&#39;=&#39;-&#39; . "- &#39;".- . - V, .< 1&#39;-:&#39;--I. _~_ .. _,- In--.-.&#39; -."7. 92 - at-_¢|..;.. ~;_. _ _ &#39; , ,&#39;..;. -&#39; . -&#39; ._ I -_ - - . - ;_ .- , . -92-;.,,.- -_ _-»&#39;, ,,-_- --.,¢-.,-2-. " -. ,- , ~ -&#39;- -- &#39;_ . .-&#39;,- - 1 , -- -- -_ .3-.. _j_ &#39; . -».-=-.&#39;.|. ,- 1 -.1: .&#39;- 1, _-:1-. mu - -_-_.__.. ,-&#39;._ 1. -.&#39;._1.- _-, ";&#39;.»-..:.~ 1&#39; --&#39;.,I . ._ a. _.&#39; , ,; ,-,,-._ ~, ~. .. :1 . :..._~ .-.- _._-_ 92 &#39;;-".. -, ;__,-.___-_&#39;,¢.n __---_ --_-92___.:_,_:_. ,,~_"-; _. .,,. ..- . 1&#39;1. _, &#39; -.. -.&#39; . _&#39;.. .- 4 . :_;_ ..- <- = . 2 1:, ,;&#39; --.~-.:&#39;-,- 1-." -.:-. ,&#39; ~ ,,._-&#39;-&#39; ._.*:&#39;:1:-&#39;1&#39;.-.;:, &#39;- ~ &#39;=t92~_ --;_2_-;&#39;-»,-I , -&#39;- -~ .&#39;<*&#39;=,&#39;.&#39;-.-_.v -r:_:,,;-V I 4 r ~.
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS September 9, 1988 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS TRIBUTE to OHIO's GREAT Others-Diamond Oaks, Laurel Oaks and Tling a Diesel Engine

    EXTENSIONS of REMARKS September 9, 1988 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS TRIBUTE to OHIO's GREAT Others-Diamond Oaks, Laurel Oaks and Tling a Diesel Engine

    23400 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS September 9, 1988 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS TRIBUTE TO OHIO'S GREAT others-Diamond Oaks, Laurel Oaks and tling a diesel engine. They look up. One of OAKS VOCATIONAL EDUCA- Live Oaks-and here they practice vocation­ them, who seems to be in charge, says TION PROGRAM al education with a vengeance. "Good morning" and they all return to Jail. The awful dark, sooty place of old work. "That's the foreman for the day," ex­ brick with greasy antiquated machines and plains Tom Wyatt, the Scarlet Oaks princi­ HON. BOB McEWEN dank halls. That has long been the image of pal. "They take turns. It's important that OF OHIO the trade school. "If you don't shape up," they know from the start what it's like. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES the mythological schoolmaster's voice in­ They won't be foremen right away once tones, "you're going to go to... .'' Right. Friday, September 9, 1988 they're out in the real world, but they'll do The vocational school. The place for dead­ better work if they know what a foreman's Mr. McEWEN. Mr. Speaker, vocational edu­ enders. problems are firsthand.'' cation has a rich heritage in our Nation, and There has been an opposite way of think­ Wyatt goes on to explain that the school ing about vocational education, of course. we are proud of the many achievements and During the Lincoln Administration, the receives many visitors, often people from accomplishments of Ohio's vocational educa­ United States Government made a powerful local business and industry.
  • The Frisco Employes' Magazine, January 1930

    The Frisco Employes' Magazine, January 1930

    Ahea Whcn Father Timc gives the signal, down the rails you go . full of hopc . new ambitions . into a new ycar . for better or for worsc. Much will depend upon thc accuracy of your watch. You will do well to face the ncw ycar with complcte confidence in the time you carry. For schedules arc sacred obligations . .aid guessworlr is dangerous. Start right with a Hamilton 992 tucked away in your watch pocket, ready with the right time all the tirnc. It will go far to assurc you of "Clear Track Ahead'' on your schcdulcd runs during thc new year. Hamilton is made for such men as you-built to pcrform accurately under thc most dificult conditions of railroad lifq. As thc ycars roll by, you will come to look upon your Hamilton as the most dcpcnd- able of fricnds. Ask your jewelcr to tell you why IIamiIton holds that enviable position as "Thc Railroad Timekeeper of America" . to show you the latest Hamilton lnodcls for Railroad or dress wcar. And Ic t 11s scnd you,withou tchargc, a convcnicnt time book to rccord your time throughout the new ycar. Address Dcpartmcnt R., IIainilton Watch Company, Lancaster, Pa. Railroad Model No. 2-the famous 992. In case of special dustproof construction with non-pull-out stern. Availahlc in l4K filled whiteor grcwn gold or 10K filled yellow gold. We sngpest a sccond watch for drcss wear- the ncw Raleigh strap model shown llere ib as plainly 1,enutif'ol in design as it is dcperd- able in performarlcc. In lili filled yellow, green or whi~cgold, S5.5.00.
  • Punishment in Prison: Constituting the “Normal” and the “Atypical” in Solitary and Other Forms of Confinement

    Punishment in Prison: Constituting the “Normal” and the “Atypical” in Solitary and Other Forms of Confinement

    Copyright 2020 by Judith Resnik, Hirsa Amin, Sophie Angelis, Megan Hauptman, Laura Kokotailo, Aseem Mehta, Madeline Silva, Tor Tarantola & Meredith Wheeler Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 115, No. 1 PUNISHMENT IN PRISON: CONSTITUTING THE “NORMAL” AND THE “ATYPICAL” IN SOLITARY AND OTHER FORMS OF CONFINEMENT Judith Resnik, Hirsa Amin, Sophie Angelis, Megan Hauptman, Laura Kokotailo, Aseem Mehta, Madeline Silva, Tor Tarantola & Meredith Wheeler ABSTRACT—What aspects of human liberty does incarceration impinge? A remarkable group of Black and white prisoners, most of whom had little formal education and no resources, raised that question in the 1960s and 1970s. Incarcerated individuals asked judges for relief from corporal punishment; radical food deprivations; strip cells; solitary confinement in dark cells; prohibitions on bringing these claims to courts, on religious observance, and on receiving reading materials; and from transfers to long- term isolation and to higher security levels. Judges concluded that some facets of prison that were once ordinary features of incarceration, such as racial segregation, rampant violence, and filth, violated the Constitution. Today, even as implementation is erratic and at times abysmal, correctional departments no longer claim they have unfettered authority to do what they want inside prisons walls. And, even as the courts have continued to tolerate the punishment of solitary confinement in the last decade, a few lower courts have held unconstitutional the profound sensory deprivations such isolation has entailed.