Regular Meeting of Council Council Chambers February 10, 2015 at 7:00Pm

Regular Meeting of Council Council Chambers February 10, 2015 at 7:00pm

1. Call to Order Introduction of Art at 1.1 Verbal Report: Mayor Clay Council File: 7705-01

2. Public Input

3. General Matters Delegation – I AM 3.1 Delegation Application: Barb Henham, dated January 20, 2015 SOMEONE Ending File: 0230-01 Bullying Society

Pages 9-10

Delegation – Tamara 3.2 Delegation Application: Tamara Tedesco, dated January 20, 2015 Tedesco – File: 0230-01 Accessibility in Port Moody

Pages 11-12

Delegation – Blue 3.3 Delegation Application: Jennifer Rodriguez, dated January 28, 2015 Dot Movement – File: 0230-01 Right to a Healthy Environment

Pages 13-18

Council’s Vision: Port Moody, City of the Arts, is a unique, safe, vibrant waterfront city of strong neighbourhoods; a complete community that is sustainable and values its natural environment and heritage character.

Please note that Council meetings are filmed and streamed live to the City’s website. Any comments you make at the meeting as well as your image may appear on the City’s website. Document: 296636

4. Adoption of Minutes Minutes 4.1 File: 0550-05

Pages 19-32 Recommendations:

THAT the minutes of the Public Hearing held Tuesday, January 27, 2015 be adopted.

THAT the minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held Tuesday, January 27, 2015 be adopted.

5. Consent Agenda Note: Council may adopt in one motion all recommendations appearing on the Consent Agenda or, prior to the vote, request an item be removed from the Consent Agenda for debate or discussion, voting in opposition to a recommendation, or declaring a conflict of interest with an item.

Finance Committee 5.1 Recommendation: Resolutions for Ratification THAT the following recommendations from the Finance Committee meetings of January 20, 2015 and February 3, 2015 be ratified: Appleyard Centennial THAT additional funding in the amount of $25,000, as recommended in the House – Project Closeout report dated January 9, 2015 from Engineering and Parks Services and Additional Funding regarding Appleyard Centennial House – Project closeout and additional Request funding request, be approved. (FC15/001)

AND THAT the funding be allocated from the City Accumulated Surplus account.

2014 Projects Funding THAT $10,000 be reallocated from project CEN13103 ‘Overhead street Reallocation – Ioco Road name signs’ to project OEN06026 ‘Ioco Road Traffic Study’ as Traffic Study recommended in the report dated January 9, 2015 from Engineering (FC15/002) Services regarding 2014 Projects funding reallocation-Ioco Road Traffic Study;

AND THAT $5,000 be reallocated from project CEN14111 ‘MRN street name signs’ to project OEN06026 ‘Ioco Road traffic study’.

Budget Strategies THAT the proposed budget meeting calendar be endorsed with a Budget Presentation Town Hall Meeting scheduled on March 5, 2015. (FC15/006) THAT no budget-specific Ipsos Reid survey be conducted in 2015;

AND THAT the Ipsos Reid survey to be conducted in 2016 include the same budget related questions as were included in the previously conducted survey.

RDH Consultant Report THAT the method for determining which projects are to be included in the (FC15/010) 2015 Capital Plan be based on a hybrid approach where Council has the final decision be approved.

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - February 10, 2015 2

Project Pre-Approval THAT the Project Pre-Approval Submissions for Budget Year 2015 be Submissions for Budget approved with the following changes: Year 2015  Remove Item 3: Arts and Culture Master Plan - $45,000 (FC15/011, 012, 013)  Remove Item 1: New Community Events (Parade, Picnic and Fireworks) - $70,000

Public Communication and THAT staff proceed with the budget consultation process as Engagement Activities for recommended in the report dated February 3, 2015 from the Corporate Budget 2015 Services Department regarding Public Communication and Engagement (FC15/017) Activities for Budget 2015.

AND THAT staff proceed with developing the public communication and engagement material as recommended in the report dated February 3, 2015 from the Corporate Services Department regarding Public Communication and Engagement Activities for Budget 2015.

Coquitlam Search and THAT $10,000 in funding be allocated from the Council Contingency Rescue Request for Funds account carried forward from 2014, estimated to be $16,000, to Coquitlam (FC15/018) Search and Rescue Society for the replacement of the Society’s Mobile Command Centre as identified in the report dated January 6, 2015 from Financial Services Department.

Source of Funding for THAT $3,500 be allocated from the Council Contingency account carried Public Consultation on Tree forward from 2014, estimated to be $16,000, to cover the costs of Protection Bylaw and Tree implementing the Public Consultation Plan for the Tree Protection Bylaw Management on City and Tree Management on City Property Policy. Property Policy (FC15/019)

Moody Ales Brewery 5.2 Report: Development Services Department – Building, Bylaw and Lounge Licensing Division, dated January 26, 2015 Endorsement File: 09-4300-01

Pages 33-50 Recommendation:

THAT staff be directed to advise the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch that the City of Port Moody wishes to opt out of the public consultation process as recommended in the report dated January 26, 2015 from Development Services regarding Moody Ales Brewery’s application for Lounge Endorsement.

Annual Report on 5.3 Report: Corporate Services – Legislative Services Division, dated the Use of the February 3, 2015 Colonel Moody File: 2240-20/AG731 Heritage Costume Recommendation: Pages 51-54 THAT the report dated February 3, 2015 from Corporate Services – Legislative Services Division regarding the Annual Report on the Use of the Colonel Moody Heritage Costume be received for information.

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - February 10, 2015 3

Council Resolutions 5.4 Report: Corporate Services Department – Legislative Services on Burrard Division, dated February 3, 2015 Generating Station File: 0550-01

Pages 55-68 Recommendation:

THAT the report dated February 3, 2015 from the Corporate Services Department – Legislative Services Division regarding Council Resolutions on Burrard Generating Station be received for information.

Repairs to Ailsa Park 5.5 Report: Engineering and Parks Services, dated January 28, 2015 Waterpark File: 11-5240-01/Vol 01

Pages 69-80 Recommendation:

THAT the report dated January 28, 2015 from Engineering and Parks Services regarding Repairs to Ailsa Park Waterpark be received for information.

6. Items Removed From The Consent Agenda

7. Legislative Matters Officers Bylaw 7.1 File: 3900-02 Amendment City of Port Moody Officers Bylaw, 2013, No. 2951, Amendment Pages 81-82 Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2997, being a bylaw to amend City of Port Moody Officers Bylaw, 2013, No. 2951.

Recommendation:

THAT City of Port Moody Officers Bylaw, 2013, No. 2951, Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2997 be adopted.

Amendments to the 7.2 File: 3900-50 Council Procedure Bylaw City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998, being a bylaw to amend Pages 83-86 City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988.

Recommendation:

THAT the City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998 be adopted.

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - February 10, 2015 4

Zoning Bylaw Text 7.3 Report: Development Services – Planning Division, dated Amendment – February 2, 2015 Commercial Medical File: 6700-20-122 Marihuana Production and City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 1988, No. 1890, Amendment Testing – Prohibited Bylaw No. 228, 2015, No. 2999, being a bylaw to include a Use definition of “Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use” and, add that use to the list of prohibited uses in the Zoning Bylaw. Pages 87-94 Recommendations:

THAT Bylaw 2999, cited as City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 1988, No. 1890, Amendment Bylaw No. 228, 2015, No. 2999, be read a first and second time as recommended in the report dated February 2, 2015 from Development Services regarding Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment – Commercial Medical Marihuana Production and Testing – Prohibited Use;

AND THAT Bylaw No. 2999 be referred to a Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at City Hall, 100 Newport Drive, Port Moody.

8. Unfinished Business

9. New Business Municipal Service 9.1 Presentation: Fire Chief and Oxana Dexter, Consultant Assessment – Report: Municipal Service Assessment – Cultural Services Cultural Services File: 2737-03

Pages 95-114 Recommendation:

THAT the Municipal Service Assessment – Cultural Services be received for information.

Marine Fire 9.2 Presentation: Fire Chief Response Options Report: Fire-Rescue Department, dated January 6, 2015 File: 14-7200-05 Pages 115-146 Recommendations:

THAT Option 1 – Purchasing Marine Fire Response Service from the City of Vancouver, as recommended in the report from the Fire-Rescue Department regarding Marine Fire Response Options dated January 6, 2015, be approved;

AND THAT additional funds of $15,000 for Fire Boat operating costs be considered during budget deliberations.

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - February 10, 2015 5

Proposed 9.3 Report: Development Services – Planning Division, dated Amendments to February 2, 2015 Official Community File: 6430-08 Plan Bylaw No. 2955 Recommendations: Pages 147-170 THAT Bylaw No. 3001, cited as City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 4, 2015, No. 3001 be read a first time.

THAT Bylaw No. 3001 be read a second time.

THAT Bylaw No. 3001 be referred to the following agencies for comments:  City of Burnaby, City of Coquitlam, Village of Anmore, Village of Belcarra  First Nations including Musqueam Nation, Kwikwetlem First Nation, Sto:lo Nation, Sto:lo Tribal Council, Skawahlook First Nation, Soowahlie First Nation, Seabird Island Band, Shxw’owhamel First Nation, Lyackson First Nation, Penelakut Tribe, Hul’qumi’num Treaty Group, Stz’uminus First Nation, Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, Lake Cowichan First Nation, Squamish Nation, Tsleil-Waututh Nation and Katsie First Nation  School District 43  TransLink  Port Metro Vancouver  BC Ministry of Environment  Fisheries and Oceans Canada

AND THAT Bylaw No. 3001 be referred to a Public Hearing on Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at City Hall, 100 Newport Drive, Port Moody.

Transparency in 9.4 Report: Councillor Diana Dilworth, dated February 3, 2015 Reporting of Council File: 01-0530-01/2015 Expenses Recommendations: Pages 171-174 WHEREAS transparency of where and how tax dollars are spent is a priority defined within the City’s Long Term Strategic Financial Plan;

AND WHEREAS the formal Schedule of Council Remuneration and Expenses must be forwarded to the Province of British Columbia by June 30th of each year and made available to the public before that date;

AND WHEREAS all levels of government are moving to a higher level of transparency related to elected officials expenditures;

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - February 10, 2015 6 THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the annual Schedule of Council Remuneration and expenses be posted to the City’s website on an annual basis;

AND THAT detailed travel and expense claims be posted to the City’s website on a quarterly basis.

Declaration of the 9.5 Report: Councillor Rick Glumac, dated February 2, 2015 Right to a Healthy File: 0630-01 Environment Recommendations: Pages 175-180 THAT the Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment be endorsed as recommended in the report dated February 2, 2015 from Councillor Rick Glumac regarding Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment;

AND THAT this declaration be forwarded to the Lower Mainland Local Government Association, the Union of BC Municipalities, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and member local governments, requesting favourable consideration by local councils and by delegates at the 2015 annual general meetings of these associations.

10. Other Business Request for Support 10.1 Letter: Canadian Union of Postal Workers, dated January 15, 2015 to Save Canada Post File: 0510-01

Pages 181-184 Request:

THAT the Save Canada Post – Stop the Cuts resolution from the Canadian Union of Postal Workers be endorsed.

11. Reports from Council 11.1 Council Verbal Reports

11.2 Staff Verbal Reports

12. Information Items Committees, 12.1  Environmental Protection Committee Minutes – November 17, Commissions, and 2014 Boards – Minutes  Library Board Minutes – November 20, 2014

Page 185-190

Council 12.2  Letter from the Minister of Infrastructure, Communities and Correspondence for Intergovernmental Affairs, dated January 29, 2015 regarding Information the Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations; a copy of the letter sent by the Council of Port Moody to the Minister on Page 191-194 November 25, 2014 is also included

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - February 10, 2015 7

13. Public Input

14. Adjournment

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - February 10, 2015 8 01/20/2015 11:26AM 6049398795 DOMINION LENDING CEN PAGE 01/01 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 9 Attachment 3.1

Application for Delegation to Counoil

If you have any questions conearning this form, please contact Colleen Rohde, Gity Clerk, 46! -4506. You may fax the completed form to the: attention of the qity Clerk at 469-4550, drop it off at the Clerk's Department it City Hall, or mail it to City Hall. Council's delegation policy anc current meeting schedule are attached for your reference. Thiiank you for fully answering the questions below. It will greatly assist us in assisting you with your presentation to Council.

DATE: 5>-o;

name: REPRESENTING: (NAME df group or organization) $MUb I cPOMtesxCAcH i {-<¦

mailing address: STREET ADDRESS (IF Dl 'FERENT FROM MAILING ADDRESS) 4-)^ Cso q u 4-1 , & &

TELEPHONE NUMBER (DlAYTIME): 1/2)13 FAX:

EMAIL ADDRESS: r fa i

preferred meeting date f(jjR DELEGATION TO COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE DATE: (please refer to attached COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE)

'-j- ?*

IF THERE IS! AN URGENCY TO \ OUR DELEGATION TIMING, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS BELOW

in the space below, pleas| BE VERY SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT ACTION YOU WOULD LIKE C ouncil to take in response to your delegation. please ATTACH COMPLETE BACKGROUND INFORMATION IN SUPPORT of your request, )|~n2 0 / rs/^O VAT-I Ju=? f>J L^P-T' s-xp ^ & <-/¦ 3> c^-f-

—TXP ^U-2_ ^).TV / US IN YOUR PRESENTATION TO C 3UNCIL, ARE YOU REQUESTING ANY FINANCIAL OR "IN-KIND" Assistance? -*yes ÿ noj^

"IF YES, APPROXIMATE AMOUNT MUST BE INCLUDED:

IN THE SPACE BELOW, PLEAS = INDICATE WHAT, IF ANY, SPECIAL PRESENTATION EQUIPMENT YOU REQUIRE FOR YOUR PRESENTATION: (WIRELESS MICROPHONE, OVERHEAD PROJECTOR, VCR, FLIP CHART, EASEL,.ETC.) '

Following your delegation, Conncll members may have questions for clarification. Council may then, either refer the issue to the next or a subsequent meeting of Council, refer the issue to staff for a report and/or refer the is sue to a committee for consideration and recommendation back to Council. You will be advised in Writing of Council's further action. THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN YOUR CCMMUNITY, COUNCIL AND STAFF WILL STRIVE TO ADDRESS YC UR CONCERNS. all personal information is pOLLECTED AND MAINTAINED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF PRIVACY ACT QUESTIONS CAN BE DIRECTED TO THE CITY CLERK, 6D4-460-4S6S.

M:\06ieQ8\Applloatlon fordelegallon lo Councll.doc

/7 / ^ 10

This Page Intentionally Left Blank RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 11 Attachment 3.2 Application for Delegation to Council

Please forward completed form to: Legislative Services Department (t) 604-469-4505 '(f) 604-469-4550 (e) [email protected] City Hall, 100 Newport Drive, Port Moody, BC V3H 3E1

Please complete the following:

DATE: ' 'Hew- '2-Q< ^0> * ^

NAME: REPRESENTING (NAME OF GROUP OR ORGANIZATION):

;

MAILING ADDRESS: STREET ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT FROM MAILING ADDRESS):

TELEPHONE NUMBER (DAYTIME): FAX NUMBER: - ^ e*\- Gc>3o

EMAIL ADDRESS:'1a^><^C^..Vexje,g:fco P. Cr\ '» b ¦

PREFERRED MEETING DATE FOR DELEGATION TO COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL MEETING DATE: (Please Refer to the Council Meeting Schedule)

IF THERE IS AN URGENCY TO YOUR DELEGATION TIMING, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAILS BELOW:

IN THE SPACE BELOW, PLEASE BE VERY SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT ACTION YOU WOULD LIKE COUNCIL TO TAKE IN RESPONSE TO YOUR DELEGATION. PLEASE ATTACH COMPLETE BACKGROUND INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF YOUR REQUEST.

cc> vn v>y\q\~c> \ v\.\puv"

»rt So oS.^^ "i¦CCeC.

IN YOUR PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL, ARE YOU REQUESTING ANY FINANCIAL/IN-KIND/FEE WAIVER ASSISTANCE? YES ÿ NO

If yes, please contact the General Manager of Cultural Services (604-469-4542) for assistance with the determination of the fee waiver amount.

Office use only: CALCULATION OF FEE WAIVER AMOUNT

PLEASE INDICATE WHAT, IF ANY, SPECIAL PRESENTATION EQUIPMENT YOU REQUIRE FOR YOUR PRESENTATION: (WIRELESS MICROPHONE, OVERHEAD PROJECTOR, VCR, FLIP CHART, EASEL, ETC.)

Following your delegation, Council members may have questions for clarification. Council may then, either refer the issue to the next or a subsequent meeting of Council, refer the issue to staff for a report and/or refer the issue to a committee for consideration and recommendation back to Council. You will be advised in writing of Council's further action. THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. COUNCIL AND STAFF WILL STRIVE TO ADDRESS YOUR CONCERNS. All personal information is collected and maintained pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Questions can be directed to the City Clerk, 604-469-4505. 12

This Page Intentionally Left Blank RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 13 Attachment 3.3

AppSication for Delegation to Council

Please forward completed form to: Legislative Services Department (t) 604-469-4603 (f) 604-469-4550 (e) [email protected] City Hall, 100 Newport Drive, Port Moody, BC V3H 5C3

Please complete the following:

DATE. January 28, 2015

NAME: REPRESENTING (NAME OF GROUP OR ORGANIZATION): Jennifer Rodriguez Blue Dot Movement - Right to a Healthy Environment

MAILING ADDRESS: STREET ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT FROM MAILING ADDRESS): 114-100 Klahanie Drive Port Moody, BC

TELEPHONE NUMBER (DAYTIME) FAX NUMBER: 778 877 4930 EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]

PREFERRED MEETING DATE FOR DELEGATION TO COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE COUNCIL MEETING DATE: (Please Refer to the Council Meeting Schedule) February 10, 2015

IF THERE IS AN URGENCY TO YOUR DELEGATION TIMING, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAILS BELOW: I would like to present when Councilor Rick Glumac puts forward the motion for Port Moody on a right to a healthy environment. He is hopeful this will be on the February 10th agenda.

IN THE SPACE BELOW, PLEASE BE VERY SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT ACTION YOU WOULD LIKE COUNCIL TO TAKE IN RESPONSE TO YOUR DELEGATION. PLEASE ATTACH COMPLETE BACKGROUND INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF YOUR REQUEST. I would like council to vote yes to a declaration on a right to a healthy environment. I would like to present why this is important to me as a resident of Port Moody, and why it will benefit all residents going forward. I have attached additional documents for council to review.

IN YOUR PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL, ARE YOU REQUESTING ANY FINANCIAL/IN-KIND ASSISTANCE? YES ÿ NO [7]

If yes, in what amount

PLEASE INDICATE WHAT, IF ANY, SPECIAL PRESENTATION EQUIPMENT YOU REQUIRE FOR YOUR PRESENTATION: (WIRELESS MICROPHONE, OVERHEAD PROJECTOR, VCR, FLIP CHART, EASEL, ETC.) none, thank you.

Following your delegation, Council members may have questions for clarification. Council may then either refer the issue to the next or a subsequent meeting of Council, refer the issue to staff for a report, and/or refer the issue to a committee for consideration and recommendation back to Council. You will be advised in writing of Council's further action. THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST IN YOUR COMMUNITY. COUNCIL AND STAFF WILL STRIVE TO ADDRESS YOUR CONCERNS. AM personal information is collected and maintained pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Questions can be directed to the Corporate Officer, 604-469-4603.

Document: 257790 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 14 Attachment 3.3

Model Municipal Declaration The Right To A Healthy Environment

Whereas the MUNICIPALITY understands that people are part of the environment, and that a healthy environment is inextricably linked to the well-being of our community;

The MUNICIPALITY finds and declares that:

1. All people have the right to live in a healthy environment, including:

The right to breathe clean air

The right to drink clean water

The right to consume safe food

The right to access nature

The right to know about pollutants and contaminants released into the local environment

The right to participate in decision-making that will affect the environment

2. The MUNICIPALITY has the responsibility, within its jurisdiction, to respect, protect, fulfill and promote these rights.

3. The MUNICIPALITY shall apply the precautionary principle: where threats of serious or irreversible damage to human health or the environment exist, the MUNICIPALITY shall take cost effective measures to prevent the degradation of the environment and protect the health of its citizens. Lack of full scientific certainty shall not be viewed as sufficient reason for the MUNICIPALITY to postpone such measures

4. The MUNICIPALITY shall apply full cost accounting: when evaluating reasonably foreseeable costs of proposed actions and alternatives, the MUNICIPALITY will consider costs to human health and the environment.

5. By Dec 31st 2015, the MUNICIPALITY shall specify objectives, targets and timelines and actions the MUNICIPALITY will take, within its jurisdiction, to fulfill residents' right to a healthy environment, including priority actions to: a. Ensure equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens within the municipality, preventing the development of pollution "hot spots"; b. Ensure infrastructure and development projects protect the environment, including air quality; c. Address climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and implementing adaptation measures; d. Responsibly increase density; e. Prioritize walking, cycling and public transit as preferred modes of transportation; RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 15 Attachment 3.3

f. Ensure adequate infrastructure for the provision of safe and accessible drinking water; g. Promote the availability of safe foods; h. Reduce solid waste and promote recycling and composting; i. Establish and maintain accessible green spaces in all residential neighbourhoods.

The MUNICIPALITY shall review the objectives, targets, timelines and actions every five (5) years, and evaluate progress towards fulfilling this declaration.

The MUNICIPALITY shall consult with residents as part of this process.

6. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the [Municipality] forward this resolution to the Lower Mainland Local Government Association, the Union of BC Municipalities, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and member local governments, requesting favourable consideration by local councils and by delegates at the 2015 annual meetings of these associations. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 16 Attachment 3.3

David Suzuki Foundation L7f

Subject: The Right to Live in a Healthy Environment

ISSUE: The inextricable link between environmental and human health is now widely recognized. Nine out of 10 Canadians are concerned about the impact of environmental degradation on their health and the health of their children1 - and with good reason. The World Health Organization estimates environmental contamination, including polluted air and water, causes as many as 36,000 premature deaths annually in Canada.2 Preventable environmental hazards contribute up to 1.5 million days in hospital annually due to cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness, cancer, and birth defects alone.3 The environment has a tremendous influence on our health and well-being.4

Municipal governments make decisions that affect transportation, housing density, waste disposal and other issues related to the quality of the environment. Local governments also have the power to pass bylaws to protect residents from environmental harm. A municipal declaration recoRnizine the right to a healthy environment would show support for residents' rights to clean air, water and safe food, signal municipal leadership in building a healthy, sustainable community and draw attention to the Canadian Constitution's silence on environmental issues.

RECOMMENDATIONS: The David Suzuki Foundation and partners recommend that the municipality; 1. Officially recognize the Right to a Healthy Environment, through a municipal declaration or equivalent measure; 2. Respect, protect and fulfill the right to a healthy environment within municipal boundaries; and 3. Encourage provincial and federal action to protect the right to a healthy environment for all Canadians.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 50 years, the right to a healthy environment has gained recognition faster than any other human right. More than 110 governments around the world, including several cities, have already recognized their citizens' right to live in a healthy environment through bylaws, declarations, legislation, charters and constitutional provisions. In the United States, over 150 local governments have passed ordinances that recognize citizens' right to a healthy environment and protect them from a range of harmful practices.5 The rights protected by these legal instruments include breathing clean air, drinking clean water, consuming safe food, accessing nature and knowing about pollutants and contaminants released into the local environment. Evidence shows that most countries with environmental rights and responsibilities in their constitutions:

» Enjoy stronger and better enforced environmental laws; ® Demonstrate enhanced government and corporate accountability; ® Have smaller per capita ecological footprints; ® Rank higher on environmental performance in over a dozen key areas; RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 17 Attachment 3.3

® Are more likely to have ratified international environmental agreements; and ® Have been more successful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.6

Today, Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms presently does not explicitly protect or even address environmental rights, leaving Canada among a minority of countries that do not yet recognize the right to a healthy environment. Just as the Charter guarantees us freedom of expression and protects us from discrimination, environmental rights would ensure that our laws and policies protect the basic elements of our survival, such as clean air, safe water and unpolluted land. While five provinces and territories have some modest form of environmental rights legislation, even in these jurisdictions (Quebec, Ontario, the Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut) the laws have significant weaknesses that undermine their effectiveness and need to be substantially strengthened. Municipal governments can help move toward developing an overarching environmental legal framework in Canada. Yellowknife became the sixth city in Canada to pass an environmental rights declaration in December 2014, following other municipalities like Montreal and Vancouver.

CONCLUSION: Most of us understand that the environment is a key factor in sustaining healthy communities. Environmental rights support many issues Canadians care about - healthy food, land use and development, water and air quality, climate change, habitat and biodiversity protection, parks creation, children's access to nature, social justice and more. Yet Canada lacks important legal protection for environmental rights. All levels of government must take action to address this oversight. Municipal adoption of a declaration respecting all residents' right to a healthy environment will set an important precedent and can inspire action at other levels of government, ultimately resulting in better environmental performance and a healthier population in Canada.7.

CONTACT: Alaya Boisvert, Project Lead Right to a Healthy Environment aboisvert(5)davidsuzuki.org 604-732-4228x1263 | 604-562-2779

DRAFT December 2014

1 McAllister, A. 2010a. A Backyard Field Guide to Canadians. Vancouver: McAllister Opinion Research; Hoggan and Associates. 2009. Sustainability Research Initiative. Vancouver: James Hoggan and Associates. 2 World Health Organization. 2008. National Estimates of Environmental Burden of Disease - Canada. Geneva: World Health Organization. 3 Boyd, D. R. and S. Genuis. 2008. "The Environmental Burden of Disease in Canada: Respiratory Disease, Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and Congenital Affliction." Environmental Research 106: 240-49. 4 Boyd, D. 2012. The Right to a Healthy Environment. Vancouver: UBC Press. 5 Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund. Community Rights, http://www.celdf.org/section.php?id=423 6 Boyd, D. R. 2013. "The Importance of Constitutional Recognition of the Right to a Healthy Environment" http://davidsuzuki.org/publications/2013/ll/DSF%20White%20Paper%201-2013.pdf 7 Boyd, D. 2012. The Right to a Healthy Environment. Vancouver: UBC Press.

2211 WEST 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 219 • VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA V6K 4S2 TOLL-FREE 1.800.453.1533 • TEL 604.732.4228 » FAX 604,732.0752 • WWW.DAVIDSUZUKI.ORG 18

This Page Intentionally Left Blank RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 19 Attachment 4.1 City of Port Moody Minutes Public Hearing

Council Chambers Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 7:11pm

Present: Mayor M.E. Clay Councillor D.L. Dilworth Councillor R.G. Glumac Councillor B.A.J. Junker Councillor M.P. Lahti Councillor P.Z.C. Royer Councillor R. Vagramov

In Attendance: Kevin Ramsay - City Manager Brian Barnett - Senior Project Engineer Neal Carley - General Manager of Engineering and Parks Services Mary De Paoli - Manager of Planning Ron Higo - General Manager of Community Services Devin Jain - Manager of Cultural Services Scott Jaques - Webmaster Kevin Jones - Planner Angela Parnell - General Manager of Corporate Services Paul Rockwood - General Manager of Financial Services Dorothy Shermer - Corporate Officer James Stiver - General Manager of Development Services Dave Teixeira - Special Project Manager, Civic Engagement

1. Business Zoning Bylaw 1.1 File: 6700-20-122 and 3900-02 Text Amendment - Commercial Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) Zoning Bylaw No. 511, Medical Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2994 (Commercial Medical Marihuana Marihuana Production), being a bylaw to amend the definition of Production Agricultural Use in the Bylaw changed, so that medical marihuana production is added to the list of excluded uses.

Mayor Clay read the meeting procedures.

The Corporate Officer confirmed that the statutory requirements for this Public Hearing have been met.

Council's Vision: Port Moody, City of the Arts, is a unique, safe, vibrant waterfront city of strong neighbourhoods; a complete community that is sustainable and values its natural environment and heritage character.

Please note that Council meetings are filmed and streamed live to the city's website. Any comments you make at the meeting as well as your image may appear on the city's website. Document: 296424 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 20 Attachment 4.1 Staff provided an overview of the proposed bylaw.

The Mayor called three times for public input. There were no written or verbal comments on Bylaw 2994 from the public.

PH15/001 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT Bylaw 2994, cited as Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) Zoning Bylaw No. 511, Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2994, be forwarded to the January 27, 2015 Regular Council meeting for further consideration.

2. Close of Public Hearing The Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed at 7:16pm.

Certified correct in accordance with Section 148(a) of the Community Charter.

D. i , Officer

Confirmed on the day of 2015.

M.E. Clay, Mayor

City of Port Moody Public Hearing - January 27, 2015 2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 21 Attachment 4.1 City of Port Moody Minutes Regular Meeting of Council

Council Chambers Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 7:16pm

Present: Mayor M.E. Clay Councillor D.L. Dilworth Councillor R.G. Glumac Councillor B.A.J. Junker Councillor M.P. Lahti Councillor P.Z.C. Royer Councillor R. Vagramov

1. Call to Order

Presentation of 1.2 Verbal Report: Mayor Clay Civic Awards File: 0290-02

The following 2014 Civic Awards were presented: • Councillor Dilworth presented the Arts Award to the Port Moody Film Society in recognition of their years of service to the community, including the presentation of the Port Moody Annual Canadian Film Festival for 14 years, and monthly screening of films since their inception; « Mayor Clay presented the Environmental Award to Seaview Community Elementary School and Seaview Gardeners, in

Please note that Council meetings are filmed and streamed live to the City's website. Any comments you make at the meeting as well as your image may appear on the City's website. Document: 295333 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 22 Attachment 4.1 recognition of their installing, restoring, and expanding the garden beds at the school to help students learn about their food supply; • Councillor Glumac presented the Heritage Award to David Spence in recognition of his exemplary dedication to heritage advocacy in, among other endeavours, his representation of Colonel Richard Clement Moody during the Centennial Celebrations; ® Councillor Glumac presented the Peter Hulbert Accessibility Award to the Port Moody Station Museum in recognition of their efforts to make the museum accessible to all by removing barriers for individuals with mobility challenges, sight or hearing impairments and mental health challenges.

Mayor Clay thanked all award recipients and nominees for their significant contributions to improving the overall quality of life in Port Moody.

Introduction of Art 1 Verbal Report: Mayor Clay at Council File: 7705-01

Tonight's Art at Council is a historical photo from an unknown photographer which was donated to the Station Museum. Back in the early 1900s Clarke Street was the main street in Port Moody. Main Streets and traditional downtowns are the heart of communities big and small, and embody the history and evolution of a community.

In this photograph, circa 1940, you will see a number of significant buildings from Port Moody's past. The tall white building on the far left is the Burrard Hotel. The hotel was originally known as the Strand Hotel but changed its name in 1924. To its right is the Johnston Brother's General Store, one of three prominent general stores in the early 1900s. As you continue moving to your right, there was the Beehive Cafe and a couple of unknown stores and then Axford's. Axford's was also a general store and in business until 1970. And lastly, on the far right is the Tourist Hotel. It was built in 1907 and closed in 1960. Back in those days the hotel had separate entrances and rooms for men and women, and it also held Port Moody's most popular pub.

2. Public Input Ann Kitching, President of the Port Moody Arts Centre, presented two cheques to the City and thanked the City for its role in expanding the Arts Centre. The first cheque was grant funding received from the Federal Government in support of the Centennial Appleyard House Addition to the Arts Centre; the second cheque was funds raised by the Port Moody Arts Centre Society for alterations to the Centennial Appleyard House to improve versatility of the main studio.

Sandy Burpee, Coquitlam Search and Rescue Society, provided an update on the funding request in item 9.1 of the agenda, noting that after the presentation to Council in December, the Society has raised a total of $350,000, and is now within $50,000 of meeting their fundraising target.

Hazel Mason, President of the Moody Centre Community Association, requested that the Official Community Plan be rescinded in favour of the

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 23 Attachment 4.1 2011 Official Community Plan.

Reiner Specht, Port Moody, noted his objection to placing a five-minute time limit on speakers at Public Hearings as proposed in item 7.2 of the agenda regarding changes to the Council Procedure Bylaw. Mr. Specht noted that he would be in favour of a 10-minute time limit. Mr. Specht also expressed his opposition to the plan to amend the Official Community Plan, and requested that the Official Community Plan be rescinded, and a 60-day extension from Metro Vancouver be requested.

Peter Dasnieres, Port Moody, expressed concern about the need for seismic upgrades to the bridge at the intersection of loco Road and the Barnet Highway, and noted that the sidewalk also requires widening to accommodate pedestrian traffic generated by the Evergreen Line.

3. General Matters Delegation - Maple 3.1 Delegation Application: Harriette Chang, dated January 6, 2015 Creek Middle File: 0230-01 School Students - Real Acts of Caring Maple Creek Middle School Students gave a presentation on Real Acts Week of Caring Week, and requested that February 8 to February 14, 2015 be proclaimed Real Acts of Caring Week in the City of Port Moody. RC15/020 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the request from Maple Creek Middle School Students regarding Real Acts of Caring Week be addressed immediately.

RC15/021 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT Feb 8 to 14, 2015 be proclaimed Real Acts of Caring Week in the City of Port Moody.

Delegation - 3.2 Delegation Application: Tamara Tedesko, dated January 20, 2015 Tamara Tedesko File: 0230-01 Accessibility in Port Moody This item has been rescheduled to the February 10, 2015 Regular Council meeting as requested by the delegation.

4. Adoption of Minutes Minutes 4.1 File: 0550-05 RC15/022 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council held Tuesday, January 13, 2015 be adopted.

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 3 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 24 Attachment 4.1

5. Consent Agenda At the request of Council, the following items were removed from the Consent Agenda for consideration under section 6: • 5.2 - Proposed Food Truck Program • 5.3 - Revised Projections for School District No. 43's Eligible School Sites Proposal - 2014 • 5.5 - Public Consultation Plan for the Tree Protection Bylaw and Tree Management on City Property Policy • 5.6 - Barnet Landfill - New Building Canada Fund

RC15/023 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the recommendations contained in the following items presented in the January 27, 2015 Regular Council Consent Agenda be adopted: • 5.1 - Committee of the Whole Resolutions for Ratification • 5.4 - Facilities Lighting Study

The items and recommendations referred to above are as follows:

Committee of the 5.1 Recommendation Adopted on Consent: Whole Resolutions THAT the following recommendations from the Committee of the for Ratification Whole meeting of January 6, 2015 be ratified: Trans Mountain Pipeline THAT this matter be referred to the Environmental Protection Committee to Expansion - Update generate alternate ideas to prevent the Trans Mountain Pipeline Project from being completed.

Community Partnership THAT the City reach out to the Tri-Cities Local Immigration Partnership to Request - Tri-Cities formally request that they attend a Council Meeting to discuss a way forward Local Immigration with a partnership. Partnership

Facilities Lighting 5.4 Report: Community Services, dated January 15, 2015 Study File: 02-0970-08

Recommendation Adopted on Consent: THAT staff submit a capital project to the 2015 - 2019 capital budget plan for facility retrofit lighting, where payback is less than six years as recommended in the report dated January 15, 2015 by Community Services regarding the Facilities Lighting Study.

6. Items Removed From The Consent Agenda Proposed Food 6.5.2 Report: Development Services Department - Building, Bylaw and Truck Program Licensing Division, dated January 19, 2015 File: 09-3900-02-1

RC15/024 Moved and seconded THAT staff be directed to proceed with drafting an amendment to the Business Licensing Bylaw No. 1508 to add a new section with specific requirements for Food Truck Vendors as recommended in

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 4 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 25 Attachment 4.1 the report dated January 19, 2015 from Development Services - Building, Bylaw and Licensing Division regarding a Proposed Food Truck Program;

AND THAT new food truck licensees be required to enter into a licence agreement with the City where all terms and conditions are detailed and acknowledged by the applicant;

AND THAT food trucks be given the opportunity to operate in Rocky Point Park during the Summer Sunday Concerts;

AND THAT staff identify and evaluate opportunities and locations in other City parks to support sporting and special community events on a case-by-case basis;

AND THAT the Recreation Centre and Rocky Point Park Parking Lot locations not be permitted at this time unless express permission has been granted for operation during the Summer Sunday Concert Series.

Moved THAT the foregoing motion be amended by removing "Summer Sunday Concerts" and replacing it with "significant events."

The motion failed for lack of a seconder.

RC15/025 Moved, seconded and DEFEATED THAT the foregoing motion be amended by replacing "Recreation Centre and Rocky Point Park Parking Lot" with "Knowle Street and Murray Street". (Voting Against: Councillors Dilworth, Junker, and Lahti, and Mayor Clay)

Separation of the fifth clause of the motion was requested.

RC15/024a The question on the first four clauses of the main motion was put and CARRIED.

RC15/024b The question on the fifth clause of the main motion was put and was DEFEATED. (Voting Against: Councillors Dilworth, Junker, and Lahti, and Mayor Clay)

RC15/026 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT staff be directed to replace the parking signs in the two approved areas to identify that the time limitations do not apply to licensed food trucks.

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 5 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 26 Attachment 4.1

Revised 6.5.3 Report: Development Services Department - Planning Division, dated Projections for January 19, 2015 School District No. File: 0490-02 43's Eligible School Sites RC15/027 Proposal - 2014 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the revised 10-year growth forecast for Port Moody included in the report dated January 19, 2015 from Development Services - Planning Division regarding Revised Projections for School District No. 43's Eligible School Sites Proposal - 2014 be forwarded to School District No. 43 for inclusion in the 2014 Eligible School Sites Resolution.

Public 6.5.5 Report: Development Services - Planning and Sustainability Divisions, Consultation Plan dated January 16, 2015 for the Tree File: 6410-04/2013 Protection Bylaw and Tree RC15/028 Management on Moved and seconded City Property THAT the Public Consultation Plan for the Tree Protection Bylaw Policy and Tree Management on City Property Policy be endorsed as outlined in the report dated January 16, 2015 from Development Services - Planning & Sustainability Divisions regarding the Public Consultation Plan for the Tree Management on City Property Policy and Tree Protection Bylaw;

AND THAT $3,500 be allocated from the Council Contingency Reserve to cover the costs of implementing the Public Consultation Plan.

RC15/029 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the foregoing motion be amended by adding: AND THAT the Public Consultation Plan specifically identify environmental organizations as stakeholders under Section 2.

RC15/030 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the forgoing motion be amended by replacing "AND THAT $3,500 be allocated from the Council Contingency Reserve to cover the costs of implementing the Public Consultation Plan." with "AND THAT the funding source for the public consultation be referred to the Finance Committee for consideration and identification of an appropriate funding source.

The question on the motion as amended was put and CARRIED. (Voting Against: Councillor Glumac)

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 6 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 27 Attachment 4.1

Barnet Landfill - 6.5.6 Report: Engineering and Parks Services, dated January 19, 2015 New Building File: 11-5360-03/2001 Canada Fund RC15/031 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT a grant application for the Barnet Landfill Closure project be supported as recommended in the report dated January 19, 2015 from Engineering and Parks Services regarding the New Building Canada Fund with the City's share of the project costs to be funded from the Land Sales Reserve.

7. Legislative Matters Officers Bylaw 7.1 File: 3900-02 Amendment City of Port Moody Officers Bylaw, 2013, No. 2951, Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2997, being a bylaw to amend City of Port Moody Officers Bylaw, 2013, No. 2951. RC15/032 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT City of Port Moody Officers Bylaw, 2013, No. 2951, Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2997 be given first, second, and third reading.

Amendments to 7.2 Report: Corporate Services Department - Legislative Services Division, the Council dated January 19, 2015 Procedure Bylaw File: 3900-50

City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998, being a bylaw to amend City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988. RC15/033 Moved and seconded THAT the City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998 be read a first, second, and third time as recommended in the report dated January 19, 2015 from the Corporate Services Department, Legislative Services Division regarding Amendments to the Council Procedure Bylaw.

RC15/034 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the foregoing motion be amended by adding: AND THAT section 7(a) and 11(i)(j)(k)(l) of City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988 be modified to include a 15 minute Public Input period at the end of the meeting as part of City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998. (Voting Against: Mayor Clay)

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 7 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 28 Attachment 4.1 RC15/035 Moved and seconded THAT the foregoing motion be amended by adding: AND THAT the wording in section 11(n) in City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998 be amended to include a maximum of ten minutes rather than five minutes during public hearing. RC15/036 Moved, seconded and DEFEATED THAT the foregoing amending motion be further amended by replacing "a maximum of ten minutes rather than five minutes during public hearing" with "no maximum". (Voting Against: Councillors Dilworth, Junker, Lahti, and Royer and Mayor Clay)

The question on the amending motion was put and was DEFEATED. (Voting Against: Councillors Dilworth, Junker, and Lahti, and Mayor Clay)

The question on the main motion as amended was put and CARRIED.

Zoning Bylaw Text 7.3 File: 6700-20-122 and 3900-02 Amendment - Commercial Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) Zoning Bylaw No. 511, Medical Marihuana Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2994 (Commercial Medical Production Marihuana Production), being a bylaw to amend the definition of Agricultural Use in the Bylaw changed, so that medical marihuana production is added to the list of excluded uses. RC15/037 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT Bylaw 2994, cited as Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) Zoning Bylaw No. 511, Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2994, be read a third time. (Voting Against: Councillor Vagramov)

RC15/038 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT Bylaw 2994 be adopted. (Voting Against: Councillor Vagramov)

8. Unfinished Business

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 8 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 29 Attachment 4.1

9. New Business Coquitlam Search 9.1 Report: Financial Services Department, dated January 6, 2015 and Rescue File: 01-0360-20-05 Funding Request Regarding Mobile RC15/039 Command Centre Moved, seconded and CARRIED Replacement THAT the granting of $10,000 to Coquitlam Search and Rescue Society for the replacement of the Society's Mobile Command Centre as identified in the report dated January 6, 2015 from the Department of Financial Services be supported;

AND THAT this grant be referred to the Finance Committee to identify the appropriate source of funding.

Official Community 9.2 Report: Development Services - Planning Division, dated January 19, Plan - Next Steps 2015 File: 6430-08

RC15/040 Moved and seconded THAT staff be directed to prepare amendments to Official Community Plan Bylaw 2955 and the associated Regional Context Statement therein to address the inconsistencies identified by Metro Vancouver for Council's consideration as recommended in the report dated January 19, 2015 from Development Services - Planning Division regarding Official Community Plan - Next Steps;

AND THAT Council request a 60-day extension from Metro Vancouver in order to have adequate time to address public feedback, prepare more detailed employment projections as requested by Metro Vancouver, and to allow council adequate time to work with staff on specific refinements to the Official Community Plan if requested by Council.

Separation of the motion was requested.

RC15/040a The question on the first part of the main motion was put and CARRIED. RC15/040b The question on the second part of the main motion was put and was DEFEATED. (Voting Against: Councillors Dilworth, Junker, and Lahti, and Mayor Clay)

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 9 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 30 Attachment 4.1

10. Other Business Support for 10.1 Letter: The Terry Fox Foundation, dated December 16, 2014 Terry Fox Run 35th File: 0230-01 Anniversary Celebrations RC15/041 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT staff be asked to report back after speaking with the Terry Fox Foundation on the specific requests and costs of participating in their 35th anniversary celebrations.

Proclamation 10.2 E-mail: Graham Walker, dated January 15, 2015 Request - File: 0630-01 Heritage Week 2015 RC15/042 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT February 16 to 22, 2015 be proclaimed Heritage Week 2015 in the City of Port Moody.

Lighting Request- 10.3 E-mail: Janice Morgante, Executive Director, Riverwalk Eating Disorders Eating Disorder and Wellness Centres, dated January 14, 2015. Awareness Week File: 0630-01

RC15/043 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the Brovold Room be lit in purple during the week of February 1, 2015 to inspire hope and raise awareness during National Eating Disorders Awareness Week.

11. Reports from Council 11.1 Council Verbal Reports Councillor Glumac noted that he was impressed by the letter staff sent to Transport Canada regarding Proposed Changes to the Vessel Pollution and Dangerous Chemicals Regulations, and that he would like to see the response received brought back to Council. RC15/044 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT staff report back at the next meeting on previous motions to UBCM on Burrard Thermal Closure in order to give Council the opportunity to draft motions to LMLGA/UBCM to oppose the closing of Burrard Thermal.

Councillor Lahti noted that the Evergreen Line Project Team will be holding an information meeting in the Seaview neighbourhood on February 2, 2015 from 7:00pm to 8:30pm, and urged residents to attend.

Councillor Dilworth announced her recent appointment to the Metro Vancouver Housing Committee, and requested clarification on whether there is an opt-out provision for glass recycling.

Staff confirmed that there is no opt-out provision for glass recycling.

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 10 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 31 Attachment 4.1

Councillor Dilworth submitted the following Notice of Motion:

WHEREAS transparency of where and how tax dollars are spent is a priority defined within the City's Long Term Strategic Financial Plan;

AND WHEREAS the formal "Schedule of Council Remuneration and Expenses" must be forwarded to the Province of BC by June 30th of each year and made available to the public before that date;

AND WHEREAS all levels of government are moving to a higher level of transparency related to elected officials expenditures;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the annual Schedule of Council Remuneration and Expenses be posted to the City website on an annual basis, and that detailed travel and expense claims be posted to the City's website on a quarterly basis.

11.2 Staff Verbal Reports The City Manager acknowledged the contributions that Dave Teixeira made as the Special Projects Manager of Civic Engagement and thanked him for his service in furthering the City's civic engagement objectives.

12. Information Items Council 12.1 • Letter from the Michael De Jong, Q.C., Minister of Finance re BC Correspondence Hydro's Burrard Thermal Generating Station, dated January 8, 2015 for Information • Letter to Transport Canada re Proposed Changes to the Vessel Pollution and Dangerous Chemicals Regulation, dated January 9, 2015 « Letter from UBCM re Appointment of Councillor Glumac to the BC Provincial Committee on Rail Safety - Public Outreach, dated January 12, 2015

Release of 12.2 From the Closed Council Meeting Held on December 9, 2014: Resolutions from Closed Council THAT as recommended in the report dated December 1, 2014 from Meetings Development Sen/ices - Planning Division regarding Appointments to Advisory Design Panel and Amendments to the Terms of Reference, the following persons be appointed to serve on the Advisory Design Panel for a term of 2 years: Graham Fligg (architect) (2nd term) Michelle Fenton (architect) Jason Wegman (landscape architect) (2nd term) Mike Bitter (engineer) Jan Voss (representative from the business community) (2nd term) Steve Kurrein (representative from the development/construction industry) (2nd term) Gregory Elgstrand (representative with a background in arts and culture) Melissa Chaun (representative with an environmental

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 11 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 32 Attachment 4.1 background) Luke van Winkel (representative from Port Moody Police Department) (2nd term)

RC15/045 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the meeting continue past 10pm.

The Mayor invited members of the public to provide input in anticipation of the restoration of the second Public Input Period.

John Grasty, Port Moody, noted that residents have the opportunity to submit written comments for all Public Hearings, and noted that Metro Vancouver have little basis on which to accurately project population and density in the region.

Deb Nijdam, Port Moody, noted that people have been given sufficient opportunity to provide input on the Official Community Plan, and that she is opposed to any consideration of rescinding the Official Community Plan.

13. Adjournment The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 10:04pm.

Certified correct in accordance with Section 148(a) of the Community Charter.

Dor porate Officer

Confirmed on the day of , 2015.

M.E. Clay, Mayor

City of Port Moody Regular Council Meeting - January 27, 2015 12 Council Agenda Information Regular Council February 10, 2015 33 Attachment 5.2

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendation to Council

Date: January 26,2015 File No. 09-4300-01

Submitted by: Development Services - Building, Bylaws and Licensing Division

Subject: Moody Ales Brewery Lounge Endorsement

Purpose / Introduction To seek Council direction with respect to an application received by the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch for Moody Ales Brewery's request to amend their licence to include a brewery lounge.

Recommended Resolution THAT staff be directed to advise the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch that the City of Port Moody wishes to opt out of the public consultation process as recommended in the report dated January 26, 2015 from Development Services regarding Moody Ales Brewery's application for Lounge Endorsement.

Background When the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) receives an application for a new liquor primary licence, the LCLB requests comment from the respective municipality.

Discussion Moody Ales Ltd. is a brewery located at Unit B - 2601 Murray Street. Moody Ales has applied to the LCLB for a brewery lounge endorsement (Attachment 1). The LCLB requires a resolution from Council indicating support and providing any comments or recommendations for the application to proceed.

The City's policy for the review of Liquor Primary Applications (Attachment 2) sets out two options for Council:

1. That the City undertake a public consultation process which includes notification to neighbouring properties, newspaper notifications and public meetings. Council would then deliberate and determine if the City was in support of the licence bases on resident response.

2. That the City "opt out" of the process.

Number: 295558 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 34 Attachment 5.2 Report/Recommendation to Council Moody Ales Brewery Lounge Endorsement January 26, 2015

Should the City choose to opt out of the consultation process, the LCLB ensures that the applicant still follows through with the requirements of the public consultation process as set out in Section 10 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Regulations to assess whether the granting of the licence would be contrary to the public interest.

Given that the LCLB has a process to ensure that a suitable and appropriate process will be followed for public consultation, and given that the location of Moody Ales is in a primarily non¬ residential area, staff feel that it is not necessary for the City to undertake the consultation process, and are therefore recommending that the City opt out of the process.

Other Options Council directs staff to proceed with the full public consultation process as set out in the City's policy for Review of Liquor Primary Applications.

Financial Implications There are no anticipated financial implications with respect to the recommendations in this report. Should Council direct staff to proceed with the public consultation process, the applicant would be charged the fee set out in the Fees Bylaw to cover the associated costs.

Communications / Civic Engagement Based on the recommendations stated in this report no communications or civic engagement is required.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The recommendation outlined in this report is consistent with Council's Strategic Plan which encourages and promotes a strong economic base for the City.

Attachments: 1. Application and letter received from the LCLB 2. Port Moody Corporate Policy for Review Applications for Liquor Primary.

2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 35 Attachment 5.2 Report/Recommendation to Council Moody Ales Brewery Lounge Endorsement January 26, 2015

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

/ ' .... Supervisor (initials): N/A Robyn MacLeod C 2^ Acting Manager of Building, Bylaws and Licensing Depai4ment-Head (initials): James Stiver

Reviewed for Form and Content / Approved for Submission to C^ouncil: City Manager's Comment/Concurrence (

^ •' City Manager

For Committee of the Whole Reports. To be completed by Legislative Services. Refer to Regular ÿ Refer to Regular ÿ Direct staff to ÿ Receive for Council as recommended. Council with amendments prepare new report for information. as discussed. Committee of the Whole. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 36 Attachment 5.2 ATTACHMENT J_ british Columbia

January 6, 2015 Job #23158859-7

Mr. Kevin Ramsay Chief Administrative Officer City of Port Moody Box 36-100 Newport Drive Port Moody, BC V3H 3E1

Dear Mr, Ramsay:

Re: New Manufacturer - Brewery Lounge Endorsement Applicant: Moody Ales Ltd. - Brewery Licence #306078 Establishment Name: Moody Ales Establishment Address: Unit B - 2601 Murray Street, Port Moody

The above-noted brewery has applied to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (the Branch) for a brewery lounge endorsement to be located at the brewery site. The Branch has completed the initial review of the application to determine applicant suitability and eligibility of the establishment type for licensing endorsements.

Having determined applicant eligibility, the application is now proceeding to the Site and Community Assessment approval (SCA) stage which is the stage for Local Government input.

The Council for the City of Port Moody is requested to consider the application and provide a resolution with their comments and recommendation with respect to the licence endorsement application. To assist with Council's assessment of the statutory criteria that must be considered, Branch staff has prepared a summary report for review and consideration by Council. The summary report is based on information provided by the applicant and by Branch staff.

Council has 90 days to either provide comments to the general manager, or to advise that they wish to "opt out" of the process. Additional time over the 90 days can be approved by the Branch if the request is received in writing prior to the end of the 90 day period.

Upon receipt of a Council resolution(s), the. Branch will review the resolution(s) to determine if all regulatory criteria have been met in accordance with section 10 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Regulations and, if recommended by Local Government, assess whether the granting of the licence endorsements would be contrary to the public interest.

Upon decision of the general manager as to whether to grant SCA approval, the applicant and the Local Government will be advised in writing.

Liquor Control and Mailing Address: Location: Licensing Branch PO Box 9292 Stn Prov Govt 4th Floor, 3350 Douglas Street Victoria BC V8W9J8 Victoria, BC Telephone: 250 952-5787 Facsimile: 250 952-7066 http://www.pssg.gov.bc.ca/lclb RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 372 Attachment 5.2

An application granted SCA approval proceeds to the construction/renovation stage of the licence endorsement process, whereby the lounge and/or special event area floor plans are reviewed and if approved in principle, the applicant may proceed with construction/renovation of the approved site. This is followed by the final stages of the licence endorsement process.

Further details of the liquor licensing endorsement application process can be found in the "Role of Local Government and First Nations in the Provincial Liquor Licensing Process" guidelines, available on the Branch website at http://www.pssq.qov.bc.ca/lclb.

If you have any questions regarding this application please contact me at 250 952-5752 or by email at [email protected].

Yours sincerely,

Vicky Tooby Senior Licensing Analyst

Enclosures

Copy: Moody Ales Ltd. McKenzie Castle, Liquor Inspector RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 38 Attachment 5.2

BIUTISH APPLICATION SUMMARY COUJMBL For Applicant and Local Government/First Nations Manufacturer-Brewery Lounge Endorsement

Date: January 5, 2015 Job# 23158859-07

Created by: Vicky Tooby, Senior Licensing Analyst

Re: Application for a Brewery Lounge Endorsement Applicant: Moody Ales Ltd. Proposed Location: Unit B, 2601 Murray Street, Port Moody Establishment Name: Moody Ales

1. APPLICATION INFORMATION

Date application deemed complete: December 11, 2014

Local Government Jurisdiction: City of Port Moody

The primary business focus of the proposed establishment: Food and Beverage

The application is for a Brewery Lounge Endorsement for the licensed Brewery, Moody Ales. The applicant currently has a manufacturing licence with a picnic endorsement and a retail sales endorsement. The lounge endorsement, if approved, will be indoors and overlap the retail sales/tasting area.

Total person capacity/occupant load requested for the lounge: 30 persons

Hours of Operation requested:

Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon 12:00 noon

10:00 PM 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 11:00 PM 10:00 PM

Terms and Conditions:

The Brewery Lounge Endorsement Area, if approved, will allow the licensed brewery to sell and serve only brewery products that are registered under the on-site Brewery Licence in the designated lounge area. Food and non-alcoholic beverages must be available at reasonable prices to customers. Hours of service and capacity are subject to local government consideration and comment.

Minors are permitted when accompanied by a parent or guardian. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 39 Attachment 5.2

2. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY AND SUITABILITY INFORMATION (Fit and Proper)

Applicant has met the eligibility and suitability requirements of the Liquor Control and Licensing Act (LCLA). 3. LOCATION/SITE FACTORS

The proposed lounge area is an interior space overlapping the retail and tasting area.

The following sections are compiled from information provided by the applicant except where indicated otherwise.

See the attached Applicant's Letter of Intent for details of the proposed lounge endorsement area, including the following details:

a) Business Focus b) Target Market c) Composition of the Neighbourhood and Reasonable Distance Measure c) Benefits to the Community d) Noise in the Community f) Impact on the Community g) Other impacts, comments or requests

Please note that the applicant's letter of intent is enclosed as an attachment to this report for reference purposes. The information or statements included in the letter of intent have not been confirmed unless otherwise stated in this report.

The following information is provided by both the applicant and the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch

The following information is provided by Liquor Control and Licensing Branch except where indicated otherwise.

POPULATION AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFORMATION : ¦ Circle population statistics for 2006 are available from BC Stats by emailing your request to [email protected]

• BC Stats Community Facts includes the BC Benefits recipient and El Beneficiary statistics and is available at http://www.bcstats.gov.bc.ca/data/dd/facsheet/facsheet.asp

• Statistics Canada Population breakdown by categories is available at: http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/prof/92- 591/index.cfm?Lang=E

4. PUBLIC INTEREST

In providing the resolution on the proposed Brewery Lounge Area Endorsement application, Local Government must consider and comment on each of the regulatory criteria indicated below. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 40 Attachment 5.2

The written comments must be provided to the general manager by way of a resolution within 90 days after the Local Government receives notice of the application, or any further period authorized by the General Manager, Liquor Control and Licensing Branch, in writing. Regulatory criteria Local Government or First Nation must consider and comment on:

(a) the location of the lounge (b) the proximity of the lounge to other social or recreational facilities and public buildings; (c) the person capacity and hours of liquor service of the lounge (d) the impact of noise on the community in the immediate vicinity of the lounge (e) the impact on the community if the application is approved.

If the operation of the brewery lounge is likely to affect nearby residents, the Local Government must gather the views of residents* in accordance with section 11.1 (2) (c) of the Act and include in the resolution:

(i) the views of the residents*, (ii) the method used to gather the views of the residents*, and (iii) comments and recommendations respecting the views of the residents*; * Note: "residents" includes business owners

For use by Liquor Control and Licensing Branch: REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS Liquor Control and Licensing Act, sections: 11,16 and 18 Liquor Control and Licensing Regulations sections: 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Class of Licence Applicant Eligibility Assessment Site and Community Assessment Building Assessment and-Issue-of-a-Licence

Attachment 1 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 41 Attachment 5.2

Letter of Intent

Purpose The purpose of the endorsement is to allow Moody Ales to provide our customers proper 20 ounce pints of the product we manufacture and allow folks who wish to enjoy more than 12 ounces of beer the opportunity to do so. We will also have one television if allowed, this will allow us to show sporting events and craft beer educational videos.

Target Market Our target market is local urban and suburbans in the tri-cities, as well as beer tourists and craft brewery enthusiasts from around the lower mainland.

Neighbourhood Composition Our immediate neighbourhood is industrial and light industrial, we are across from a wood mill, beyond about 400M from us the neighbourhood transitions to commercial space at around 500-600m from us it becomes residential. We have a park about 450M from our location.

Please see a street map attached.

Benefits to the Community In the last six months, two local pubs have closed their doors. Craft Breweries and small pubs are an important part of a growing community. Our lounge is a place for locals to come and meet their neighbours and new faces in the community. The tri-cities residents have a growing desire for craft beer and our lounge will provide them a place to get fresh, local craft beer.

Our endorsement will also bring more beer tourism to the community, this will impact other surrounding service and food based businesses as these tourists will likely also be patrons of some of those businesses.

Impact of Noise Our location is directly in the middle of an industrial area, with no residential space directly near us. Our lounge is located in the front of the building, and our front door faces a large wood mill. There are no residences in our immediate neighbourhood for about 500M. We also have a train corridor right behind our building, between us and the closest residents and

fe? V - RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 42 Attachment 5.2

commercial spaces. The train is considerably louder than we are, as are some of the industrial business surrounding us.

We will not have amplified music that is audible outside, this is a small endorsement and additional traffic will not create noise. We have outdoor lighting and cameras on the exterior of the building and plan on closing earlier than most pubs.

Other Impacts on the Surrounding Community Our craft brewery lounge may be an attraction to folks looking to move and purchase homes and property in the area. Many urban vancouverites are moving out this way and love the idea of having a local craft brewery as they are so used to having access to these in Vancouver. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 43 Attachment 5.2

ATTACHMENT 2

Sample Resolution Template for a Manufacturer Lounge or Special Event Area Endorsement

General Manager, Liquor Control and Licensing Branch

RE: Application for a manufacturer lounge or special event area endorsement at: (address of proposed establishment)

At the (council/board) meeting held on (date), the (council/board) passed the following resolution with respect to the application for the above named manufacturer licence:

"Be it resolved that: 1. The (council/board) (recommends/does not recommend) the issuance of the winery lounge or special event area endorsement for the following reasons: (detail and explain reasons for recommendation)

2. The (council's/board's) comments on the prescribed considerations are as follows: (see the following page for sample comments for each criterion - a comment on each must be included in the resolution. Where a staff report has been prepared that addresses the criteria this can be used to provide Council's comments provided the staff report is referenced in the resolution and there is a clear statement that Council endorsed the comments in the report.)

(a) The location of the manufacturer lounge or special event area (provide comments) (b) The proximity of the manufacturer lounge or special event area to other social or recreational facilities and public buildings (provide comments) (c) In the case of a manufacturer lounge, the person capacity of the lounge (provide comments) (d) hours of liquor service of the lounge or special event area (e) traffic, noise, parking and zoning, and (f) The impact on the community if the application is approved (provide comments) If the operation of the lounge or special event area may affect nearby residents, the local government must gather the views of residents of an area determined by the local government or first nation.

If the local government or first nation wishes to provide comments to the general manager, it must provide the following in writing: (a) Its comments addressing the criteria in subsection (9); (b) If it has gathered the views of residents under subsection (10), (i) the views of the residents* (ii) the method used to gather the views of the residents*, and (iii) it's comments and recommendations respecting the views of the RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 44 Attachment 5.2

residents* (iv) The reasons for its recommendations. * Note: "residents" includes business owners

3. The (council's/board's) comments on the views of residents are as follows: (describe the views of residents, the method used to gather the views and provide comments and recommendations with respect to the views. If the views of residents were not gathered, provide reasons).

The undersigned hereby certifies the above resolution to be a true copy of the resolution passed by the (council/board) of (local government/First Nation) on (date).

Sincerely,

(signature) (name and title of official) (local government/First Nation)

Note: • All of the items outlined above in points 1, 2 (a) through (f) and 3 must be addressed in the resolution in order for the resolution to comply with section 10 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Regulation. • Any report presented by an advisory body or sub-committee to the council or board may be attached to the resolution.

ATTACHMENT 3

Sample Resolution for a Manufacturer Lounge or Special Event Area Endorsement Application

The following are examples that illustrate the type of comments that local government and First Nations might provide to demonstrate they have taken into consideration each of the criterion in reaching their final recommendation. Comments may be a mix of positive, negative and neutral observations relevant to each criterion. The final recommendation is the result of balancing these 'pros and cons'.

The list is not intended to illustrate every possible comment as the variations are endless, given the wide range of applications and local circumstances.

It is important that the resolution include the comment and not refer to a staff report, as the general manager cannot suppose that the local government considered all the criteria unless comment on each criterion is specifically addressed in the resolution itself. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 45 Attachment 5.2

Local government or First Nation staff may wish to contact the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch for assistance on drafting the content of a resolution before it is presented to local government or First Nation to avoid resolutions that do not comply with the regulations.

(a) The location of the manufacturer lounge or special event area:

The location of the manufactuer lounge is within the primary manufacturing facility. It has an interior and a patio area. It is located in a remote location and is suitable for such an endorsement.

(b) The proximity of the lounge to other social or recreational facilities and public buildings:

The only nearby social, recreational and public buildings do not conflict with the operation of a lounge. - or - The proposed location of the lounge is across a lane from a church with an attached retirement facility and church hall routinely used for youth group gatherings. The proximity of the proposed winery lounge is considered compatible with the neighbouring facilities.

The maximum person capacity of the y lounge is 65 persons as per building authorities.

(d) Hours of liquor service of the lounge:

Hours of liquor service are proposed to be from 4 PM to 10 PM daily. A larger capacity or later hours is not supported given the few number of police on duty to respond to concerns.

(e) Traffic, noise, parking and zoning:

Traffic in the area is not an issue. The road is located away from the main road resulting in noise not being an issue. Ample parking is available at the winery. Zoning permits a lounge for the sale and service of liquor by the glass or bottle.

(f) The impact on the community if the application is approved;

If the application is approved, the impact is expected to be positive in that it will support the growth in tourism and offer a new social venue for residents.

The Council's comments on the views of residents are as follows: RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 46 Attachment 5.2

The views of residents within a half mile* of the proposed lounge area were gathered by way of *written comments that were received in response to a public notice posted at the site and newspaper advertisements placed in two consecutive editions of the local newspaper. Residents were given 30 days from the date of the first newspaper advertisement to provide their written views. Residents were also given an opportunity to provide comments at the public meeting of Council held on date.

A total of 63 responses were received from businesses and residents. Of the responses received, 21 were in support of the application citing the creation of additional jobs and a new entertainment venue for the area as their primary reasons. A total of 42 letters were received in opposition to the application. The primary reason cited by those in opposition was the proposed closing hours. A number of business residents in the area also cited the lack of parking as an area of concern.

The following examples illustrate one option that Council may complete their comments on the views of residents based upon the preceding fact pattern.

Based upon the input received by residents within a half mile of the proposed winery lounge there is a two to one ratio of opposed residents to residents that support the application. The opposition to this endorsement comes from both homeowners and businesses. Council is of the view that with both the residential and business communities' opposition to this proposed establishment that the issuance of a winery lounge endorsement would be contrary to the community standard for this area.

Despite the potential creation of additional jobs and a new entertainment venue for the area Council is unable to support the issuance of the endorsement. Council recommends that a licence not be issued.

* The local government or First Nation determines the appropriate area to be included and the method for gathering those views RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 47 Attachment 5.2 ATTACHMENT 2-

City of Port Moody CORPORATE POLICY MANUAL

Section: Legislative and Regulatory Affairs 9 Sub-Section: Building, Bylaws and Licensing 3760 Title: Review of Applications for Liquor Primary 2 Establishments, Food Primary Establishments and Wineries to Amend their Liquor Licenses

RELATED POLICIES

Number Title

APPROVALS

Approval Date: April 27,2004 Approved By Council Amended: Approved By Amended Approved By Amended Approved By

C:\Users\rmacleod\Appbata\Roaming\Hummingbird\DM\Temp\EDMS-#17411-v1-Approved_Corporate_Policies_-_09-3760-2_- _Review_of_App!ications_for_Liquor_Primary Food_Primary_and_Winery_Eslabiishments_to_amendJheir_Liquor_L.DOC RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 48 Attachment 5.2

Corporate Policy Manual Review of Applications for Liquor Primary, Food Primary & Wineries to amend their Liquor Licenses - ' 9-3760-2 Page 2

POLICY

1. The Manager of Building, Bylaws and Licensing shall have primary responsibility for coordinating the review of liquor license applications and shall seek the input of the Port Moody Police Department, and other City Departments as deemed appropriate.

2. City staff will advise Council of all applications referred to the City for review from the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch (LCLB) for:

(a) liquor-primary establishments applying to extend their hours of operation, increase their person capacity, or add a patio; (b) food-primary establishments applying to add patron participation entertainment or extend their hours for serving liquor beyond 12:00 a.m.; and (c). wineries applying to obtain a picnicking endorsement or a winery lounge endorsement.

3. Each application shall be subject to a public consultation process except that Council may, if it so wishes, opt out of review of an application by notifying the LCLB in writing.

4. Council may also determine that the public consultation portion of the review process not be undertaken upon an applicant's written request, where Council considers that nearby residents will not be affected. In such cases. Council shall deliberate the matter as set out below and provide a resolution to the LCLB in writing either supporting or not supporting the application along with the criteria that were used as a guide in reaching a resolution.

5. Unless otherwise determined by Council as per 3. and 4. above, public consultation by the applicant will be required as part of the City's consideration of an application starting with a public open house held by the applicant at a time and location considered appropriate by the City. The purpose of the public open house will be for attendees to ask questions of the applicant and for the applicant to receive feedback. At least one member of City staff shall attend a public open house as an observer.

6. The City shall deliver written notice of the application and public open house by . mail or hand to all property owners and tenants within a 60 metre radius of the RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 49 Attachment 5.2

Corporate Policy Manual Review of Applications for Liquor Primary, Food Primary & Wineries to amend their Liquor Licenses 9-3760-2 Page 3

subject property. Notice of the public open house shall also be advertised twice in the local newspaper.

7. Following the public open house, the application will be discussed by Council at a regular or special meeting of Council, the location and time of which shall be advertised at least once in the local newspaper. For this Council meeting, a staff report will be prepared summarizing and responding to the public input received addressing the regulatory criteria established by the LCLB. The staff report will also provide comments and recommendations.

8. Council shall discuss the application at the advertised meeting, at which time both the applicant and any member of the public who wishes to speak to Council on the matter may do so. Written submissions prior to or at the meeting shall also be accepted by Council.

9. Upon considering the application and input received. Council shall at the meeting provide a resolution to the LCLB in writing either supporting or not supporting the application along with the criteria that were used as a guide in reaching the resolution. Alternatively, Council may return the application to staff for further work.

10. The criteria established by the LCLB that Council shall use as a guide in its consideration of applications by liquor-primary and food-primary establishments to amend their licenses include:

(a) the potential for noise if the application is approved; (b) the impact on the community if the application is approved; and, (c) the potential for a food-primary establishment to operated in a manner that is contrary to its primary purpose if the application is to add patron participation entertainment or extend the hours for serving liquor beyond 12:00 a.m.

11. The criteria established by the LCLB that Council shall use as a guide in its consideration of applications for winery licence endorsement applications include:

(a) the location of the winery lounge or picnicking area; (b) how close the winery lounge or picnicking area is to other social or recreational facilities or public buildings; RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 50 Attachment 5.2

Corporate Policy Manual Review of Applications for Liquor Primary, Food Primary & Wineries to amend their Liquor Licenses 9-3760-2 Page 4

(c) the person capacity of the proposed winery lounge; (d) hours of liquor service; (e) traffic/noise, parking and zoning; and, (f) the impact of the winery lounge or picnicking area on the community.

12. If in processing an application, it appears that the 90 day referral deadline established by the LCLB will be exceeded, staff are authorized to request an extension from the LCLB.

MONITORING/AUTHORITY Delegated to the Manager of Building, Bylaws and Licensing. Council Agenda Information [x] Regular Council February 10, 2015 51 Attachment 5.3

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendation to Council

Date: February 3,2015 File No. 2240-20/AG731

Submitted by: Corporate Services - Legislative Services Division

Subject: Annual Report on the Use of the Colonel Moody Heritage Costume

Purpose / Introduction To present to Council the first annual report on the Use of the Colonel Moody Heritage Costume.

Recommended Resolutions

THAT the report dated February 3, 2015 from Corporate Services - Legislative Services Division regarding Annual Report on the Use of the Colonel Moody Heritage Costume be received for information.

Background Pursuant to an agreement signed between the City of Port Moody and Mr. David Spence on February 26, 2014, Mr. Spence is required to submit an annual report detailing events and occasions where the uniform was used. The report was received by email on February 1, 2015, and is attached to this report as Attachment 1.

Other Options No other options are presented for consideration.

Financial Implications There are no financial implications associated with the receipt of this report.

Communications / Civic Engagement No communication or civic engagement is required by the receipt of this report.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives Continued endorsement of the Use of the Colonel Moody Heritage Costume promotes cultural expression.

Attachments: 1. First Annual Report on he Use of the Colonel Moody Heritage Costume.

EDMS-#297556-v1-RTC_-_Annual_Report_on_the_Use_of_the_Colonel_Moody_Heritage__Costume RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 52 Attachment 5.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Annual Report on the Use of the Colonel Moody Heritage Costume February 3, 2015

Prepared by. Reviewed by:

Dorothy Shermer Angela Parnell Corporate Officer General Manager of Corporate Services

Reviewed for Form and Content / Approved for Submission to Council: City Manager's Comment/Concurrence U/-

^ J City Manager

EDMS-#297556-v1-RTC_-_Annual_Report_on_the_Use_of_the_Colonel_l\/loody_Heritage_Costume RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 53 Attachment 5.3 ATTACHMENT FIRST ANNUAL REPORT PER AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF THE COL. MOODY HERITAGE COSTUME

Date 01st February 2015

As per the Agreement, dated 26th February 2014

1. The costume is in my possession.

3. The uniform costume is in good condition.

4. The uniform was used on occasion to promote the history of Col. Moody and/or the City of Port Moody.

5. Details of events and occasions where #4 was enacted, is as follows:

January 2014 I attended the City's Centennial Steering Committee; and I met with Ms. Linda Reimer MLA.

February 2014 I celebrated Col. Moody's 201st birthday on the 13th.

March 2014 I met with Don Bourdon of the Royal B. C. Museum regarding the recent acquisition of the Col. Moody photo album.

April 2014 I attended the City's Centennial Steering Committee.

May to June 2014 I attended the Royal Commonwealth Society National meeting in Charlottetown, PEL

July 2014 I attended a lecture at the R.B.C.M. where Patrick Lydon talked about the Sooke/ Leechtown Gold Rush in 1864.

August 2014 I attended Barbados Days in Fort Langley.

page 2 (continued) RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 54 Attachment 5.3

page 2 (continued)

September 2014 I visited Col. Richard Moody's death and burial place in Bournemouth, Dorset, UK. While there I met with: (1) the Vicar of St. Peter's Church and Cemetery, Rev. Ian Terry, where Moody is buried and is known as the "Founder of British Columbia"; (2) Mayor Chris Mayne and Counsellors of the City of Bournemouth; and (3) Mr. John Walker, the City's archivist. I also located and spent time in Lyme Regis, Dorset, where Col. Moody and his family returned to England after his five years in the Colony of British Columbia. He lived there until his death in 1887. In each place, and with each opportunity, I spoke of the vibrancy of the City of Port Moody as a significant legacy of Col. Moody.

October 2014 I was invited to speak with a group of seniors at the Shoal Seniors Centre, Sidney, about Col. Moody's work in the Colony and how he is connected with the City of Port Moody.

Furthermore, I personally encouraged Pitt Meadows in planning celebrations for their 2014 centennial activities after the experience of Port Moody's centennial events.

Periodically, I spoke of the significant relationship between the vision of Col. Moody and the vibrancy of the City of Port Moody on many other casual occasions, near and far, including Regina, Winnipeg, Whistler; and on Vancouver Island including Sidney, Victoria, Chemainus, Ucluelet, and Duncan; as well as along the route of our journey through Scotland and England in September.

In addition, I took the advantage to relate Col. Moody and the City of Port Moody at various organizations, including the Duke of Edinburgh's Awards, the Peninsula Streams Society, the Mary Winspear Centre Foundation, the Royal Commonwealth Society, Royal Roads University, and the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, as well as with Lieutenant-Governor Judith Guichon.

On all these occasions, I did not always appear in the heritage costume of Col. Moody, but when ever the opportunity arose, I proudly wore the uniform.

Submitted by

David Spence (signed) Council Agenda Information [x] Regular Council February 10, 2015 55 Attachment 5.4

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendation to Council

Date: February 3,2015 File No. 0550-01

Submitted by: Corporate Services Department- Legislative Services Division

Subject: Council Resolutions on Burrard Generating Station

Purpose / Introduction To present to Council previous motions made regarding the Burrard Thermal Plant.

Recommended Resolutions

THAT the report dated February 3, 2015 from Corporate Services Department - Legislative Services Division regarding Council Resolutions on Burrard Generating Station be received for information.

Background At the Regular Council meeting held on January 27, 2015, Council passed the following resolution:

THAT staff report back at the next meeting on previous motions to UBCM on Burrard Thermal Closure in order to give Council the opportunity to draft motions to LMLGA/UBCM to oppose the closing of Burrard Thermal.

Discussion To provide as complete a history as possible, all Council motions regarding the Burrard Thermal Plant have been collected and are attached to this report as Attachment 1. The UBCM Resolution Database indicates that the only UBCM resolution regarding the Burrard Thermal Plant is the one submitted by Port Moody in 2008 (see Attachment 2).

Other Options No other options are presented for consideration.

Financial Implications There are no financial implications associated with the receipt of this report.

Communications / Civic Engagement No communication or civic engagement is required by the receipt of this report.

EDMS-#297552-v1-RTC - Council Resolutions on Burrard Thermal RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 56 Attachment 5.4 Report/Recommendation to Council Council Resolutions on Burrard Generating Station February 3, 2015

Council Strategic Plan Objectives Information contained in the report facilitates Planning for the Future.

Attachments: 1. Excerpt from Council minutes regarding the Burrard Thermal Plan. 2. UBCM Resolutions Detail: 2008-B77

EDMS-#297552-v1-RTC - Council Resolutions on Burrard Thermal RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 57 Attachment 5.4 Report/Recommendation to Council Council Resolutions on Burrard Generating Station February 3, 2015

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

-wSr -

Dorothy Shermer Angela Parnell Corporate Officer General Manager of Corporate Services

Reviewed for Form and Content / Approved for Submission to Council: City Manager's Comment/Concurrence

' City Manager

EDMS-#297552-v1-RTC - Council Resolutions on Burrard Thermal RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 58 Attachment 5.4 attachment 1 Council Resolutions on the Burrard Thermal Plant

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - February 19, 1996

BURRARD Burrard Thermal Community Liaison Committee THERMAL 1995 Integrated Electricity Plan - Proposed submission to B.C. Utilities Commission Hearing

Moved by Councillor Hulbert and seconded

124-96 THAT given the information in the B.C. Hydro 1995 Integrated Electricity Plan, the Burrard Thermal Community Liaison Committee, and the City of Port Moody agree that if the B.C. Hydro Burrard Thermal Plant is to continue to operate in the community, that we support the re-powering of three (3) modules to combined cycle and the de-commissioning of the remaining units;

AND THAT any future operation at the Plant must be to the highest environmental standards, with minimal impact;

FURTHERMORE THAT we believe that the long-term use of the existing technology, even in the upgraded form with Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), is not in the best interest of the community, nor the Province.

Carried Unanimously.

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - August 19, 1996

B.C. HYDRO 5.3 Letter: BC Hydro dated July 31, 1996 BURRARD Excerpt: July 29, 1996 Regular Council Meeting Minutes THERMAL PROJECT UPGRADE Moved by Councillor Wilkinson seconded and CARRIED 455-96 THAT the letter from BC Hydro dated July 31, 1996 be received for information.

Moved by Councillor Wilkinson, seconded and CARRIED 456-96 THAT the letter from B.C. Hydro dated July 31, 1996, be acknowledged with a letter thanking B.C. Hydro for taking Port Moody's concerns into consideration and indicating that Port Moody is looking for B.C. Hydro not to run more than is absolutely necessary 1 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 59 Attachment 5.4

and not to run anything that is not with selective catalytic reduction.

Excerpt from Special Council Minutes - August 26, 1996

BURRARD 2.4 Letter: BC Hydro dated August 23, 1996 THERMAL GENERATING STATION Moved by Councillor Rhodes, seconded and CARRIED OPERATIONS THAT the letter from BC Hydro dated August 23, 494-96 1996 he received for information.

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - December 16, 1996

BURRARD 7.3 Letter: Burke Mountain Naturalists dated December 5, THERMAL 1996 Oral Report: Mayor Marusyk File: 0420-35

Moved by Councillor Trasolini, seconded and Carried 347-96 THAT, if and when an application is made by BC Hydro to re-power to combined cycle or any other kind of technology basis, no recommendation or decision on the re-powering of Burrard Thermal be made until full assessments of the environmental, social, economic and transportation of dangerous goods impacts on our community caused by the generating of electricity from the Plant have been conducted and made public.

Moved by Councillor Trasolini, seconded and Carried 348-96 THAT 1. a letter be sent to the Honourable Dan Miller, Minister Responsible for Crown Corporations and to the Honourable Paul Ramsay, Minister of the Environment, relaying Council's position; and 2. neighbouring municipalities be requested to provide similar supporting resolutions regarding the re-powering of Burrard Thermal.

Excerpt from Closed Council Minutes - August 6, 2004

BURRARD 5.2 The City Manager tabled notes of a discussion he had THERMAL held with John Maher, Environmental Manager, Burrard CLOSURE Thermal.

Moved, seconded and CARRIED

2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 60 Attachment 5.4

THAT a letter be sent to BC Hydro and the Provincial Government reiterating the City of Port Moody's concern about the future of the Burrard Thermal Plant and Council's opposition to purchasing or producing electricity generated by environmentally harmful sources such as coal. 7. RELEASE OF IN-CAMERA ITEMS

Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the Burrard Thermal item be publicly released and that a press release be issued.

Excerpt from Committee of the Whole Minutes - October 12, 2004

BURRARD 5.3 Verbal Report: Councillor Rockwell THERMAL File: 5280-75-05 DECOMMISSIONI NG Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT Council write a letter to the BC Hydro Board of Directors in advance of their board meeting of October 20, 2004 clearly stating the City's position with respect to the potential shutting down of the Burrard Thermal Generating Station and requesting consultation with the City prior to any decision on the future of the Burrard Thermal Generating Station.

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - October 12, 2004

COMMITTEE OF 7.1 Verbal Report: Mayor Trasolini THE WHOLE MEETING Recommendation:

THAT the resolutions of the Committee of the Whole meeting of October 12,2004 be endorsed as follows:

BURRARD THAT Council write a letter to the BC Hydro Board of THERMAL Directors in advance of their board meeting of October 20, DECOMMISSIONING 2004 clearly stating the City's position with respect to the potential shutting down of the Burrard Thennal Generating Station and requesting consultation with the City prior to any decision on the future of the Burrard Thermal Generating Station.

3 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 61 Attachment 5.4

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - April 25, 2006

B.C. HYDRO 2006 6.2 Report: Finance and IT dated April 10, 2006 INTEGRATED Report: Mayor Trasolini dated April 25,2006 ELECTRICITY File: 1880-01 PLAN'S (IEP) FINANCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTA Moved, seconded and CARRIED L IMPACT ON THAT the Finance and IT department's "B.C. Hydro THE CITY OF 2006 Integrated Electricity Plan's (IEP) Financial and PORT MOODY Environmental Impact on the City of Port Moody" report dated April 10, 2006 be received for information.

Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to advocate for industry proposals for innovative re-use of the Burrard Thermal installation into a research and development facility focused on clean alternative forms of energy generation.

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - December 11, 2007

Privatized Power 6.10 File Excerpt: April 25, 2006 Regular Council meeting and Burrard Notice of Motion: Councillor Rockwell Thermal - Notice Verbal Report: Councillor Rockwell of Motion File: 0550-08

Councillor Rockwell brought forward a notice of motion as follows:

Whereas-the BC Energy Plan and the recent BC government self-sufficiency directive to the BC Utilities Commission (BCUC), could see the closure of Burrard Thermal even though the Burrard Thermal plant has let BC Hydro take advantage of the wholesale electricity markets without being dependent on them and is an extremely important strategic asset to the BC Hydro system, and;

Whereas Burrard Thermal's unique value includes being strategically located in the lower mainland close to a highly concentrated population base, helps ensure peak and annual electricity requirements can be met and is an important facility to the economy and tax base of Port Moody and can be retrofitted and repowered to include the full offset of GHG and other emissions, and;

Whereas the BC Utilities Commission has not yet 4 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 62 Attachment 5.4

addressed whether it is in the best interests of British Columbians to close Burrard Thermal, and recent independent analysis suggests our self-sufficiency requirements could be most affordably and environmentally met by balancing domestic and imported power supply combined with a retrofitted and repowered Burrard Thermal, however Calgary-based Westpac LNG has recently begun planning to construct a natural gas generation and import facility on Texada Island in the Strait of Georgia, which the proponent claims will speed the closure of Burrard Thermal.

Therefore be it resolved that the City of Port Moody oppose all efforts to close this important and strategic asset and call for an immediate upgrade and repowering of Burrard Thermal to include the full offset of GHG or other emissions, and;

Therefore be it resolved that the City of Port Moody continue to oppose the actions of Bill 30 that precluded municipalities in having meaningful input into any energy developments, and;

Therefore be it finally resolved that the City of Port Moody call upon the UBCM to conduct a comprehensive review of the impacts of the BC governments Energy Plan including the future of Burrard Thermal, the impacts of new developments and the future of our public hydro system.

Councillor Rockwell advised that when the motion comes forward at the next Council meeting she would be providing research critiquing the provincial government's Energy Plan.

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - January 8, 2008

Privatized Power 5.1 Report: Councillor Rockwell dated January 3, 2008 and Burrard "Lost in Transmission: A Comprehensive Critique of the BC Thermal Energy Plan" was distributed under separate cover and made available for public viewing at the corporate relations Counter and at the Council meeting File: 0230-40

Moved, seconded and CARRIED WHEREAS the BC Energy Plan and the recent BC government self-sufficiency directive to the BC 5 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 63 Attachment 5.4

Utilities Commission (BCUC), could see the closure of Burrard Thermal even though the Burrard Thermal plant has let BC Hydro take advantage of the wholesale electricity markets without being dependent on them and is an extremely important strategic asset to the BC Hydro system, and Burrard Thermal's unique value includes being strategically located in the lower mainland close to a highly concentrated population base, helps ensure peak and annual electricity requirements can be met and is an important facility to the economy and tax base of Port Moody and can be retrofitted and repowered to include the full offset of GHG and other emissions;

AND WHEREAS the BC Utilities Commission has not yet addressed whether it is in the best interests of British Columbians to close Burrard Thermal, and recent independent analysis suggests our self- sufficiency requirements could be most affordably and environmentally met by balancing domestic and imported power supply combined with a retrofitted and repowered Burrard Thermal, however Calgary- based Westpac LNG has recently begun planning to construct a natural gas generation and import facility on Texada Island in the Strait of Georgia, which the proponent claims will speed the closure of Burrard Thermal:

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Port Moody oppose all efforts to close this important and strategic asset and call for an immediate upgrade and repowering of Burrard Thermal to include the full offset of GHG or other emissions, and that the City of Port Moody continue to oppose the actions of Bill 30 that precluded municipalities in having meaningful input into any energy developments, and;

THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the City of Port Moody call upon the UBCM to conduct a comprehensive review of the impacts of the BC government's Energy Plan including the future of Burrard Thermal, the impacts of new developments and the future of our public hydro system. Voting against: Councillor Clay

6 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 64 Attachment 5.4

Excerpt from Committee of the Whole Minutes - June 24, 2008

Continued 5.1 Report: Burrard Thermal Liaison Committee dated Operation of June 13,2008 Burrard Thermal File: 0360-20-12 Generating Station Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the recommendation be introduced as read.

Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the following recommendation from the Burrard Thermal Liaison Committee be endorsed and forwarded to the 2008 UBCM Convention:

WHEREAS the Burrard Thermal Generating Plant (BTGP) in Port Moody has the capacity to generate approximately 10% of the total electricity demand supplied by BC Hydro, is a firm source located within the region that consumes approximately 50% of BC Hydro's capacity and thus is strategically located to supply electricity during emergency conditions such as ice storms which could affect transmission lines.

AND WHEREAS pollution from the plant is not a reason to close the plant given that a number of improvements in recent years have significantly reduced emissions of smog-producing pollutants, there is no significant negative impact from the plant on water quality in Burrard Inlet, BTGP releases only a small fraction of the green house gases (GHG) emitted from vehicles in Metro Vancouver, has been well maintained and thus continues to have a reasonable life span well beyond 2014 and particularly given that BTGP operates primarily during the winter months to meet peak energy demand when the generation of smog-producing chemicals is of least concern. AND WHEREAS using Burrard Thermal rather than purchasing electricity from coal-fired sources outside British Columbia is consistent with provincial energy policies to promote self-sufficiency and reduce GHG production and thus could avoid anticipated electricity shortages that will occur in the absence of a continued reliance on BTGP.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT UBCM request that the BC Provincial Government not close the Burrard Thermal Generating Plant in 2014 which, according to the Provincial Energy Plan would result in 7 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 65 Attachment 5.4

an electricity shortage, but rather keep BTGP in operation and fully maintained as a firm, reliable and relatively clean energy source to help meet the Province's electricity needs during high demand periods, such as the winter months, or emergency conditions as well as providing ongoing voltage regulation.

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - June 24, 2008

Committee of the 7.1 Moved, seconded and CARRIED Whole Meeting THAT the resolution of the Committee of the Whole meeting of June 24,2008 be endorsed as follows:

Continued THAT the following recommendation from the Burrard Operation of Thermal Liaison Committee he endorsed and forwarded to the Burrard Thermal 2008 UBCM Convention: Generating Station WHEREAS the Burrard Thennal Generating Plant (BTGP) in Port Moody has the capacity to generate approximately 10% of the total electricity demand supplied by BC Hydro, is a firm source located xvithin the region that consumes approximately 50% ofBC Hydro's capacity and thus is strategically located to supply electricity during emergency conditions such as ice storms which could affect transmission lines.

AND WHEREAS using Burrard Thennal rather than purchasing electricity from coal-fired sources outside British Columbia is consistent with provincial energy policies to promote self-sufficiency and reduce GHG production and thus could avoid anticipated electricity shortages that will occur in the absence of a continued reliance on BTGP.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT UBCM request that the BC Provincial Government not close the Burrard

8 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 66 Attachment 5.4

Thermal Generating Plant in 2014 which, according to the Provincial Energy Plan would result in an electricity shortage, but rather keep BTGP in operation and fully maintained as a firm, reliable and relatively clean energy source to help meet the Province's electricity needs during high demand periods, such as the winter months, or emergency conditions as well as providing ongoing voltage regulation.

Excerpt from Regular Council Minutes - January 6, 2009

Council 2.2 Report: Acting City Manager dated December 15,2008 Committee (2.1) File: 0360-00 Structure Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the Burrard Thermal Liaison Committee be disbanded.

9 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 67 Attachment 5.4

ATTACHMENTS^

Resolutions Detail

Year Number Resolution Title Sponsor 2008 B77 Continued Operation of Burrard Thermal Port Moody Generating Station

Resolution Text Convention Decision

WHEREAS the Burrard Thermal Generating Plant (BTGP) in Port Moody has Endorsed the capacity to generate approximately 10% of the total electricity demand supplied by BC Hydro, is a firm source located within the region that consumes approximately 50% of BC Hydro's capacity and thus is strategically located to supply electricity during emergency conditions such as ice storms Executive Decision which could affect transmission lines; AND WHEREAS pollution from the plant is not a reason to close the plant given that a number of improvements in recent years have significantly reduced emissions of smog-producing pollutants, there is no significant negative impact from the plant on water quality in Burrard Inlet, BTGP releases only a small fraction of the green house gases (GHG) emitted from vehicles in Metro Vancouver, has been well Committee Decision maintained and thus continues to have a reasonable life span well beyond 2014 and particularly given that BTGP operates primarily during the winter months to meet peak energy demand when the generation of smog-producing chemicals is of least concern; AND WHEREAS using Burrard Thermal rather than purchasing electricity from coal-fired sources outside British Columbia is consistent with provincial energy policies to promote self-sufficiency and reduce GHG production and thus could avoid anticipated electricity shortages that will occur in the absence of a continued reliance on BTGP: THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that UBCM request that the BC provincial government not close the Burrard Thermal Generating Plant in 2014 which, according to the Provincial Energy Plan would result in an electricity shortage, but rather keep BTGP in operation and fully maintained as a firm, reliable and relatively clean energy source to help meet the Province's electricity needs during high demand periods, such as the winter months, or emergency conditions as well as providing ongoing voltage regulation.

Provincial Response

http://www.ubcm.ca/resolutions/ResolutioiiDetail.aspx?id=3268&index=0&year=&no=&resTitle=... RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 68 Attachment 5.4

Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources In its 2008 Long Term Acquisition Plan (2008 LTAP), BC Hydro has asked the British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC) to endorse BC Hydro's proposal to rely on Burrard for planning purposes for 900 megawatt of dependable capacity and 3,000 gigawatt hours of firm energy per year until at least 2019. The Government recognizes that the value of the capacity, energy and voltage support provided by Burrard may warrant continuing to keep the plant available if needed for peaks in demand (for example, resulting from cold winter weather, Christmas lighting, and to deal with other resources being unexpectedly unavailable). These may continue to be appropriate longer term roles for Burrard if the plant remains cost effective. The BCUC will continue to oversee the resource plans of utilities, and will review BC Hydro's 2008 LTAP, including BC Hydro's plans for Burrard, and will approve the projects and plans it deems to be cost effective and in the public interest.

Federal Response

Other Response

http://www.ubcm.ca/resolutions/ResolutionDetail.aspx?id=3268&index=0&year=&no=&resTitle= Council Agenda Information S Regular Council February 10, 2015 69 Attachment 5.5

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendation to Council

File No. 11-5240-01/Vol 01

Submitted by: Engineering and Parks Services

Subject: Repairs to Ailsa Park Waterpark

Purpose / Introduction To provide an update to Council on recommended improvements to this Ailsa Park Waterpark.

Recommended Resolutions

THAT the report dated January 28, 2015 from Engineering and Parks Services regarding Repairs to Ailsa Park Waterpark be received for information.

Background This report provides an update on Ailsa Waterpark, outlining the design progress and intended course of action for this project.

The Ailsa Park Splashpad was identified as a capital project in 2012, with an initial budget allocation of $86,500. The existing splashpad has extensive surface cracks, with much of the asphalt surface showing signs of failure. Fraser Health Authority has expressed concerns with the continued operation of the facility (citing concerns with trip hazards and concerns with slips/falls). At the time of installation, this project did not include any considerations for enhancements of the facility to current industry standards, nor did the scope include review and assessment of the water supply system or drainage outlets.

Staff retained a design consultant (Durante Kreuk Architects Ltd.) to prepare design options for this facility, including cost estimates for the various options. As part of the design considerations, the condition of the water supply system and the drainage outlet for the facility were identified as further areas of concern, requiring consideration in the design. A final design option was developed that incorporated improvements to the water and drainage systems. Reductions in the size and layout of the facility were necessary (see Attachment 1) to more closely align with the available budget. This work was completed in 2013.

As part of the consultation process, staff met with representatives of the Glenayre Neighbourhood Association to review the consultant's design options. They expressed concern with the size and layout of the proposed design, indicating that it was significantly smaller and without the same character as the existing facility. They were also very concerned with potential delays associated with the construction of a new facility. The consultant noted that a new facility

EDMS-#296651-v1-Repairs_to_Ailsa_Park_Waterpark_-_Council_Report RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 70 Attachment 5.5 Report/Recommendation to Council Repairs to Ailsa Park Waterpark January 28, 2015 would require approval from the Fraser Health Authority, which could take 4-6 months. Following receipt of this information, staff revisited the design, looking for possible alternatives that would provide a more effective design solution.

Discussion Through the review process, staff explored other opportunities to rehabilitate the facility surface, using alternative materials and approaches, as outlined in the options shown below.

Summary of Recommended Approach

While a full reconstruction of the waterpark (as contemplated in Options 3A/3B - below) would provide the most effective overall solution, that work could not be completed within the available timeframe and available budget this year. Based on detailed review of the available options, staff are intending to proceed with Option 2 (refurbish the existing surface), as that option would allow the facility to continue to operate for a set period of time and would address Fraser Health Authority concerns. It is anticipated that staff would pursue further consultation and design evaluation as part of subsequent consideration of a longer-term solution (as part of future capital budget considerations).

Option 1 Remove and replace the existing surface, water supply, and drainage system

This option is essentially a complete rehabilitation and replacement of the existing asphalt surfacing, including improvements to water features and storm drainage system.

Discussion:

This option would allow for in-situ repairs and the timely completion of the work. It would also more closely match the character and function of the current splashpad, which would address input received from the neighbourhood association. Given that this option would rehabilitate the splashpad within its current footprint, Fraser Health Authority staff have indicated that a formal application for approval would not be required.

It is important to note that this option does not incorporate installation of new spray (toy) features. It is anticipated that these features could be provided as funding allows (through future budget considerations). The cost of the spray heads typically range from $5,000 to $25,000, depending on the complexity of the unit. The water supply system proposed under this option would incorporate new (compatible) bases and piping, with temporary (removable) spray features.

This option does create a schedule risk (due to the extent, of work required), and could not be completed within the available budget.

EDMS-#296651-v1-Repairs_to_Ailsa_Park_Waterpark_-_Council_Report RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 71 Attachment 5.5 Report/Recommendation to Council Repairs to Ailsa Park Waterpark January 28, 2015

Option 2 Refurbish existing surface

This option would include sandblasting and sealing of the existing surface, leaving the current spray features in place.

Discussion:

This option would allow for in-situ repairs to the existing surface materials only (removing cracked/peeled surface defects), using select (spot) repairs to repair defects and provide a new (sealed) surface.

While this option would address concerns from Fraser Health, it represents a short term solution that would require further work within a 3 to 5 year timeframe. Improvements to the existing water supply system could not be included in this option, due to the extensive excavation work necessary to access the piping network. Drainage improvements would also need to be deferred to future works due to budget and schedule constraints.

Option 3A Replace the existing facility with a new (similar sized) facility

This option would require complete demolition of the existing facility, and replacement of same with a new facility of a similar size. New spray toy features would be incorporated, including new water supply and drainage infrastructure.

Discussion:

Given that this would represent the construction of a new facility, approval from the Fraser Health Authority would be required (timeframe for approval is estimated at 4-6 months). The construction timeframe required to remove the existing facility and construct the replacement would be extensive (there us the potential that the project could not be completed until after the peak summer months - i.e. late September). Through the consultation process, the neighbourhood association expressed concern with any potential delays in completing the construction.

Based on the timeframe, approval requirements, and costs associated with this option, staff are not recommending this option be pursued at this time.

Option 3B Replace the existing facility with a new (smaller) facility

This option would require complete demolition of the existing facility, and replacement of same with a smaller facility (to more closely align with available project budget).

EDMS-#296651 -v1 -Repairs_to_Ai!sa_Park_Waterpark_-_Council_Report RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 72 Attachment 5.5 Report/Recommendation to Council Repairs to Ailsa Park Waterpark January 28, 2015

Discussion:

This option is essentially the same as Option 3A, however, the footprint of the facility was reduced (by approximately one-half) to more closely align with the available budget. It would still require formal approval from Fraser Health, and would not be complete in time for the peak summer period.

The neighbourhood association expressed concerns with this option, as it would greatly reduce the useable space, and negatively impact the character of the facility.

Based on the timeframe, approval requirements, costs and input received from stakeholders, staff are not recommending this option be pursued at this time.

Financial Implications The work proposed under Option 2 can be completed within the available project budget allocated. Staff do not anticipate that any additional funds will be required.

The current project budget allocation is $86,500, with an available $68,500 remaining to complete the scope of works.

Communications / Civic Engagement The Glenayre Neighbourhood Association were consulted as part of refining the available options. Based on their input, they would prefer improvements to the existing facility that would retain a similar character and layout. They were not supportive of any reduction in facility size (as proposed in Option 3B). They were also concerned with any extensive delays related to the approval process for a new facility.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives This project follows Council's Strategic Objectives of Excellence in Service and Nurturing Community. Maintenance of existing infrastructure assets is a key strategic objective of the City.

Attachments: 1. Preliminary design plans (Durante Kreuk). 2. Resurfacing graphics (asphalt prints).

EDMS-#296651-v1-Repairs_to_Ailsa_Park_Waterpark_-_CounciLReport RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 73 Attachment 5.5 Report/Recommendation to Council Repairs to Ailsa Park Waterpark January 28, 2015

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

.A. c/ fl Supervisor: George MacDuff James Chandler Senior Project Engineer

Department Head: Neal Carley

Reviewed for Form and Content / Approved for Submission to Council: City Manager's Comment/Concurrence ( 1 / / yT) ~~~}f A ' ^ J City Manager

Corporate Review Initials

Community Services (Cultural Services, Facilities, Recreation) Financial Services

For Committee of the Whole Reports. To be completed by Legislative Services. Refer to Regular ÿ Refer to Regular O Direct staff to O Receive for Council as recommended. Council with amendments prepare new report for information. as discussed. Committee of the Whole.

EDMS-#296651-v1-Repairs_to_Ailsa_Park_Waterpark_-_Council_Report RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 74 Attachment 5.5

Align north end with existing asphalt path

NOTE: Resilient surfacing and associated forming to ba priced as Optional Pi Resilient surfacing GREEN Resilient surfacing SLUE

Uscatlon to match existing bollard

A!ISA SPRAY PARK UPGRADE Port Moody, BC

NOTE: WIggly and Spiral Spray Mini are to be Installed using the existing In-ground plumbing (If plumbing meets the plumbing code) Provide new plumbing for all other pieces of equlpmet to ensure proper Location to match existing bollard functioning of all spray pari: components. Where possible maximize re-use of the existing components (underground and abover ground) DemoIIIIon Plan

SPRAY PARK ENLARGEMENT PLAN ; No.: oSCALE-ISO • 12062

ArmcHMZn/T 1 C>a9e lofZ) RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 75 Attachment 5.5

LEGEND: & Existing grades proposed Grades o Existing manholes Existing Control for the BBS! Spray Park equipment VTTA Paving to be removed EM] New Paving See L4 m Existing vegetation

Pralod No; 12062

L-l of 5

faTrmH-n&JT i (P*5

WESTERN CANADA (604) 309-8212 J^j EASTERN CANADA (416) 540-9287 REQUEST MORE INFORMATION Solutions High Performance Decorative Crosswalks Traffic Calming & Streetscape Enhancement Green Bike Lane Treatments HUB Community Branding SURFACE SYSTEMS Commercial Hardscapes Residential Driveways Parks & Paths Educational Facilities Architectural Protective Coatings Airport/Military Markings Products StreetPrint Genuine Stamped Asphalt StreetBond Coating Systems for Asphalt Durashield Asphalt Protection TrafficSoapes Crosswalks & Traffic Calming Solutions DecoMarfc Logos & Horizontal Surface Signage Green Bike Lane Treatments AirMark Durable Pavement Markings for Airfields Architectural Coatings Projects Alternate Transportation Branding on Horizontal Surface Commercial Properties Decorative Driveways Enhanced Crosswalks Pnhlif , /n lAi

' VN'iv''' ' - k .

i—u ¦ .v ¦ ¦

Georg

In Notre-C- . .

Using the! surfaces), a variety < _ ¦¦ . :i ¦ . : i... . ¦ ¦¦¦ ..¦ . |( | __ _ _ i Thermo-DBapiilpfcifrom the Montreal plastic templates to help achieve the desired outcome, as well as a lot of patience!

1 »' ""'S -

http://hubss.com/2014/07/15/georges-st-pierre-montreal-waterpark/ 2/02/15 Georges St-Pierre - Montreal Waterpark - HUB Surface Systems RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 77 Attachment 5.5

WESTERN CANADA(604) 309-8212 (*! EASTERN CANADA(416) S40-9287 REQUEST MORE INFORMATION Solutions High Performance Decorative Crosswalks Traffic Calming & Slreetscape Enhancement Green Bike Lane Treatments Community Branding # HUB Commercial Hardscapes SURFACE SYSTEMS Residential Driveways Parks & Paths Educational Facilities Architectural Protective Coatings' Airport/Military Markings Products StreetPrint Genuine Stamped Asphalt StreetBond Coating Systems for Asphalt Durashieid Asphalt Protection TrafficScapes Crosswalks & Traffic Calming Solutions DecoMark Logos & Horizontal Surface Signage Green Bike Lane Treatments AirMark Durable Pavement Markings for Airfields Architectural Coatings Projects Alternate Transportation Branding on Horizontal Surface Commercial Properties Decorative Driveways Enhanced Crosswalks Public Spaces Parks & Pathways Schools Streetscapes & Community Branding Townhomes Traffic Calming Devices

http ://hubss.com/2014/07/15/georges-st-pierre-montreal-waterpark/ 2/02/15 Quebec Splashpad in StreetBond - music theme - HUB Surface Systems RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 78 Attachment 5.5

WESTERN CANADA (604) 303-8212 |*j EASTERN CANADA (416) 540-9287 REQUEST MORE INFORMATION Soluiions High Performance Decorative Crosswalks Traffic Calming & Streelscape Enhancement Green Bike Lane Treatments # HUB Community Branding SURFACE SYSTEMS Commercial Hardscapes Residential Driveways Parks & Paths Educational Facilities Architectural Protective Coatings Airport/Military Markings Products StreetPrint Genuine Stamped Asphalt StreetBond Coating Systems for Asphalt Durashield Asphalt Protection TrafficScapes Crosswalks & Traffic Calming Solutions DecoMark Logos & Horizontal Surface Signage Green Bike Lane Treatments AirMark Durable Pavement Markings for Airfields Architectural Coatings - Projects

iding

Quebe The recenttfSBfrffiteted water play park created quite a splash (groan) at Park Toe Blake in Vaudreuil-Dorion. StreetBond was used to create the musical theme throughout the splash pad, bringing a bold and bright alternative to the standard concrete offering.

Professionally installed byThermo-Design Inc, based in the Montreal area, using a variety of standard colours offered in the StreetBond line.

%. —.....

MP'

Splash pads offer a new and different application for the StreetBond line of products, and offer an unlimited amount of design options to the end user and design team.

Featured Projects

http ://hubss .com/2014/07/09/quebec-splashpad-in-streetbond-music-theme/ 2/02/15 Quebec Splashpad in StreetBond - music theme - HUB Surface Systems RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 79 Attachment 5.5

WESTERN CANADA (604)309-8212 §*] EASTERN CANADA (416) 540-9287 REQUEST MORE INFORMATION Solutions High Performance Decorative Crosswalks Traffic Calming & Streetscape Enhancement Green Bike Lane Treatments <£* HUB Community Branding SURFACE Y S T £ 6! S Commercial Hardscapes Residential Driveways Parts & Paths Educational Facilities Architectural Protective Coatings Airport/Military Markings Product? StreetPrint Genuine Stamped Asphalt StreetBond Coating Systems for Asphalt Durashield Asphalt Protection TrafficScapes Crosswalks & Traffic Calming Solutions DecoMark Logos & Horizonfal Surface Signage Green Bike Lane Treatments AirMark Durable Pavement Markings for Airfields Architectural Coalings Projects Alternate Transportation Branding on'Horizontal Surface Commercial Properties Decorative Driveways Enhanced Crosswalks Public Spaces Parks & Pathv/ays Schools Streetscapes & Community Branding Townhomes Traffic Calming Devices .—^jE'iiUaSise. r tfis ¦ -e'.— y 6'^ .t Pr< 1) c 'W "

Quebi I The recen;

StreetBor rete offering, i

Professionally installed byThermo-Design Inc, based in the Montreal area, using a variety of standard colours offered in the StreetBond line.

Splash pads offer a new and different application for the StreetBond line of products, and offer an unlimited amount of design options to the end user and design team.

Featured Projects

http ://hubss.corn/2014/07/09/quebec-splashpad-in-streetbond-music-tlieme/ 2/02/15 80

This Page Intentionally Left Blank RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 81 Attachment 7.1

City of Port Moody

Bylaw No. 2997

A Bylaw to amend City of Port Moody Officers Bylaw, 2013, No. 2951.

The Council of the City of Port Moody enacts as follows:

1. Citation 1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as City of Port Moody Officers Bylaw, 2013, No. 2951, Amendment Bylaw No. 2, 2015, No. 2997.

2. Amendment 2.1 Section 3.1 is amended by replacing "City Clerk" with "Corporate Officer".

2.2 Section 4.2 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"4.2 The Corporate Officer, and in the Corporate Officer's absence, the Manager of Legislative Support, is assigned the powers, duties and responsibilities for corporate administration pursuant to section 148 of the Community Charter."

3. Severability 3.1 If a portion of this bylaw is found invalid by a court, it will be severed and the remainder of the bylaw will remain in effect.

Read a first time this 27^ day of January, 2015.

Read a second time this 27^ day of January. 2015. Read a third time this 27^ day of January, 2015. Adopted this day of , 2015.

M.E. Clay D. Shermer Mayor Corporate Officer

Document: 295314 82

This Page Intentionally Left Blank RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 83 Attachment 7.2

City of Port Moody

Bylaw No. 2998

Whereas the Council for the City of Port Moody did, on the 9th day of September. 2014 enacted a bylaw cited as "City of Port Moody Council Procedures Bylaw 2988, 2014";

And Whereas the Council for the City of Port Moody deems it advisable to further amend said Bylaw.

The Council of the City of Port Moody, in an open Meeting duly assembled, enacts as follows:

1. Citation 1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998

2. Amendments 2.1 City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw 2014, No.2988, Schedule "D" Council Proceedings is hereby amended by:

(a) deleting subsections (g) and (h) under Section 6 - Agenda and replacing it with the following:

(g) Members may vote on and adopt in one motion all recommendations appearing on the Consent Agenda portion of a regular Agenda. Members shall request removal of items from the Consent Agenda prior moving adoption of recommendations listed in the Consent Agenda. (h) At any time prior to a vote, a Member may for the purposes of: (i) debate or discussion, (ii) voting in opposition to a recommendation on the Consent Agenda, or (iii) declaring a conflict of interest with respect to an item on the Consent Agenda, request that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda. The item will be considered immediately after the consideration of the Consent Agenda. (b) adding the following subsections (m) and (n) under Section 11 - Delegations and Presentations:

(m) All persons with an interest in a proposed bylaw which is the subject of a public hearing shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to be heard or to present written submissions on matters contained in the bylaw, after first identifying themselves by stating their name and city of residence, and the

Document: 295332 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 84 Attachment 7.2

name and address of the person or body they represent (if applicable).

(n) Presentations by members of the public at a public hearing shall be limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes each. If a person has additional information that he is unable to provide within that time frame, he/she shall be given further opportunities to address Council after all other interested members of the public have been heard a first time. Without limiting the opportunity provided for in section (m) of this bylaw, speakers shall be encouraged to confine their comments to new information.

(c) deleting items 12 and 13 under subsection (a) of Section 7 - Order of Proceedings and replacing it with the following:

12. Information Items: Committee Minutes and information that may be of public interest and is placed on the Agenda by the Mayor; and receipt of Closed Meeting items approved for public release 13. Public Input 14. Adjournment

(d) deleting subsections (i),(j)>(k), and (I) in Section 11 - Delegations and Presentations and replacing it with the following:

(i) One 15-minute public input period will be held at the commencement of a regular Meeting of Council; and one 15-minute public input period will be held immediately preceding adjournment of a regular Meeting of Council. Persons wishing to speak must so indicate by placing their name and address on a speaker's list prior to the public input period. The list shall determine the order of speakers with preference given to Port Moody residents.

(j) During public input periods when recognized by the Chair, persons from the audience may address Council to comment on any matter coming within the competence of Council. Speakers must state their name and municipality, and will be allowed 2 minutes to speak. Persons may not speak on a bylaw from a closed public hearing.

(k) If, at the end of 15 minutes of a public input period, there still remain speakers on the list, Council may, by unanimous resolution, agree to extend the length of the public input period.

(I) From the beginning of the nomination period preceding a general local election or by-election, public input periods shall be suspended until the Meeting of Council following the election.

3. Severability 3.1 If a portion of this bylaw is found invalid by a court, it will be severed and the remainder of the bylaw will remain in effect.

City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998 2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 85 Attachment 7.2

Read a first time this 27^ day of January, 2015 Read a second time this 27^ day of January, 2015 Read a third time this 27^ day of January, 2015 Pursuant To Section 94 of the Community Charter, Public Notice of Intention was inserted in the newspaper on this 30^ day of January 2015 and this 4^ day of February, 2015 Adopted this day of 2015

M.E. Clay D. Shermer Mayor Corporate Officer

I hereby certify that the above is a true copy of Bylaw No. 2998 of the City of Port Moody.

D. Shermer Corporate Officer

City of Port Moody Council Procedure Bylaw, 2014, No. 2988, Amendment Bylaw No. 1, 2015, No. 2998 3 86

This Page Intentionally Left Blank Council Agenda Information [3 Regular Council February 10, 2015 87 Attachment 7.3

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendation to Council

File No. 6700-20-122

Submitted by: Development Services - Planning Division

o h| t. Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment - Commercial Medical Marihuana u ^eG ' Production and Testing - Prohibited Use

Purpose / Introduction To present for consideration a text amendment to the City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw No. 1890, that would add a definition of "Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use" to the definitions section of the Bylaw and add that use to the list of prohibited uses in the City.

Recommended Resolutions

THAT Bylaw 2999, cited as City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw, 1988, No. 1890, Amendment Bylaw No. 228, 2015, No. 2999, be read a first and second time as recommended in report dated February 2, 2015 from Development Services regarding Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment - Commercial Medical Marihuana Production and Testing - Prohibited Use;

AND THAT Bylaw No. 2999 be referred to a Public Hearing on Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at City Hall, 100 Newport Drive, Port Moody.

Executive Summary The Bylaw text amendment proposed in this report is in response to the change in Federal regulations relating to the production and testing of marihuana for medical use. Prior to March 31, 2014, the production of medical marihuana was restricted by the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) program, under which individuals could grow marihuana for themselves, or have a designated person grow marihuana for them. As of March 31, 2014, the Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulation (MMPR) came into effect which focuses production to fewer, but larger scale commercial producers.

The proposed text amendment to the City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw proposes to add a definition of "Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use" to the definitions section, and add that use to the list of prohibited uses in the City. The prohibition of such a use should be based upon valid planning purposes. In the case of medical marihuana production and testing, the rationale for its prohibition in Port Moody is based on concerns over the suitability of sites for such a use from a law enforcement point of view, and the proximity of potential sites to other land uses seen as non-compatible, such as parks, schools and other institutional uses and residential land uses.

#295873 1 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 88 Attachment 7.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment - Commercial Medical Marihuana Production and Testing - Prohibited Use February 2, 2015

Background The new Federal MMPR came into effect on March 31, 2014. The new regulation replaced the MMAR, which authorized individuals to grow marihuana for themselves, or have a designated person grow marihuana for them. The new MMPR program includes a licensing system that is intended to allow for production of medical marihuana on a larger commercial scale, similar to that of other pharmaceutical products.

Following the changes in these regulations, staff reports were considered by the Committee of the Whole on May 20, 2014 and July 15, 2014. Following Committee discussion at the July 15, 2014 meeting, the following resolutions were passed:

THAT staff be directed to prepare the necessary bylaw amendment to GVRD Zoning Bylaw No. 511 to prohibit medical marihuana production uses within the existing A-1 Small Holding Rural Zone and A-2 Extensive Rural and Recreational Zone lands within Port Moody.

THAT the Port Moody Zoning Bylaw No. 1890 be amended to allow medical marihuana production and testing in M1 and M3 zones within the urbanized areas of the City as recommended in report dated June 30, 2014 from Development Services - Planning Division regarding Regulation of Commercial Medical Marihuana Production in Port Moody.

The proposed Bylaw amendments were reviewed on September 2, 2014 by the Land Use Committee. As part of the discussion, concern was expressed over the proximity of some of the M3 zoned lands to residential properties. The discussion resulted in the following resolutions being passed:

THAT the application to amend GVRD Zoning Bylaw (No. 511) in order to prohibit medical marihuana production uses in the Small Holding Rural Zone (A-1*) and the Extensive Rural and Recreational Zone (A-2*) lands be supported as presented.

THAT the application to amend the City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw (No. 1890) in order to permit medical marihuana production uses in the Light Industrial (M1) and the General Industrial (M3) lands be supported as presented.

THAT the foregoing motion be amended to exclude the Suncor properties.

At the January 13, 2015 Regular Council Meeting, the text amendments to the GVRD and City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaws were considered..

The GVRD Zoning Bylaw Amendment Bylaw proposed to change the definition of Agricultural Use, by adding medical marihuana production to the list of excluded uses. This proposed

2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 89 Attachment 7.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment - Commercial Medical Marihuana Production and Testing - Prohibited Use February 2, 2015 amendment applied to ail Small Holding Rural Zone (A-1*) and Extensive Rural and Recreation Zone (A-2*) zoned properties in the former GVRD lands on the north shore. Following discussion at the January 13, 2015 meeting, this Bylaw was given first and second reading and referred to Public Hearing. On January 27, 2015, at the Regular Council Meeting that immediately followed the Public Hearing, Council adopted the Bylaw.

Following discussion at the January 13, 2015, Regular Council Meeting, the proposed Bylaw to permit medical marihuana production and testing in M1 and M3 zoned lands, with the exception of the Suncor lands, was defeated and the following resolution was passed:

THAT a Zoning Text Amendment be brought forward to prohibit commercial medical marihuana production and testing in Port Moody.

Discussion Many municipalities in Metro Vancouver have assessed their land use bylaws in light of recent changes to the federal regulations governing the production of medical marihuana. In some municipalities with agriculturally zoned areas, medical marihuana production is a permitted use in all or some agricultural zones. Others permit the use within specific industrial zones. In some cases, zones have been created to accommodate the use without any corresponding lands identified, requiring a site specific rezoning in each case. At this time, commercial medical marihuana production is not a permitted use in North Vancouver District, West Vancouver, Pitt Meadows, and the City of Langley.

In relation to the prohibition of commercial medical marihuana production and testing, the prohibition of such a use should be based upon valid planning purposes. Concern over the suitability of sites within Port Moody for such use from a law enforcement point of view, and also the proximity of potential sites to other land uses seen as non-compatible, such as residential and institutional, could be seen as valid planning related considerations.

As part of the MMPR licensing process, Health Canada requires licensed producers to comply with all federal, provincial/territorial and municipal laws and bylaws, including municipal zoning bylaws. As part of the application process, applicants are required to notify local governments, police forces and fire authorities of their intention to apply to Health Canada. Licensed producers are also required to communicate with local authorities whenever there is a change in the status of their licence.

Port Moody Zoning Bylaw No. 1890 The proposed text amendments to the Zoning Bylaw include, adding a definition of 'Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use' to the Definitions section of the Zoning Bylaw, which would read:

Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use means a use providing for the commercial production and/or the testing of medical marihuana.

3 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 90 Attachment 7.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment - Commercial Medical Marihuana Production and testing - Prohibited Use February 2, 2015

Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use is proposed to be added to the list of prohibited uses in the General Regulations section of Zoning Bylaw. A copy of the Draft City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment Bylaw is included as Attachment 1.

Public Safety The Port Moody Police Department feels that the new MMPR process appears to be a preferable alternative to that which was in operation under the MMAR. However, as the MMPR represents a major change to the rules and regulations, it is not clear exactly how the new system will work and there is still some concern that organized criminal activity may be a part of the process.

Controlled Substance Property Bylaw It is also noted that the City has a Controlled Substance Property Bylaw No. 2523. That Bylaw was enacted on October 8, 2002, primarily to deal with the issue of illegal marihuana grow operations in the City and the costs associated with decommissioning them, including City related inspections. Within that Bylaw, Section 3.1, under "Prohibition of Controlled Substance Manufacture" states that: "No Person, Owner or Occupant of Property within the City shall cause, permit or allow any Property to become or remain a place for the trade, business or manufacture of a Controlled Substance"

The definition of Controlled Substance, as per the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, 1996 c.19, includes within its definition marihuana, its preparations, derivatives and similar synthetic preparations. The text amendment to the Zoning Bylaw proposed in this report would be compatible with the content of the Controlled Substance Property Bylaw.

Other Options THAT Bylaw No. 2999 not be given First and Second reading and not proceed to Public Hearing.

Financial Implications In addition to staff time associated with the processing of a Zoning Bylaw text amendment, there would also be additional costs associated with required newspaper advertisements. These costs would be covered within the existing budget for Development Services.

Communications / Civic Engagement In accordance with the City's Development Approval Procedures Bylaw and the Local Government Act, notification of the Land Use Committee meeting advertisements were placed in the August 27th and 29th, 2014 editions of The Now. Should this application proceed to Public Hearing, it will again be advertised in the local newspaper in accordance with the Development Approval Procedures Bylaw and the Local Government Act.

4 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 91 Attachment 7.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment - Commercial Medical Marihuana Production and Testing - Prohibited Use February 2, 2015

Council Strategic Plan Objectives This proposal is consistent with the following goals of the 2012 Port Moody Council Strategic Plan: Planning for the Future: - We plan strategically for the City's future. Attachments: 1. Draft City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment Bylaw No. 2999. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 92 Attachment 7.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Zoning Bylaw Text Amendment - Commercial Medical Marihuana Production and Testing - Prohibited Use February 2, 2015

6 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 93 ATTACHMENT 1Attachment 7.3 City of Port Moody

Bylaw No. 2999

A Bylaw to include a definition of "Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use" and, add that use to the list of prohibited uses in the Zoning Bylaw.

The Council of the City of Port Moody enacts as follows:

1. Citation 1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw 1988, No. 1890, Amendment Bylaw No. 228, 2015, No. 2999 (Commercial Medical Marihuana Production & Testing - Prohibited Use)

2. Amendment City of Port Moody Zoning Bylaw 1988, No. 1890, is amended:

2.1 By adding the definition of "Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use":

""Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use" means a use providing for the commercial production and/or the testing of medical marihuana."

2.2 By adding to Section 5.1 the words "Medical Marihuana Production and Testing Use";

3. Severability 3.1 If a portion of this bylaw is found invalid by a court, it will be severed and the remainder of the bylaw will remain in effect. 3.2

Read a first time this day of 2015.

Read a second time this day of 2015.

Public Hearing held this day of , 2015.

Read a third time this day of _, 2015.

Adopted this day of , 2015.

M. E. (Mike) Clay D. Shermer Mayor Corporate Officer

#296322 94

This Page Intentionally Left Blank RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 95 Attachment 9.1

Municipal Service Assessment Cultural Services

Port Moody Team Action Plan RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 96 Attachment 9.1

2 Municiapal Service Assessment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 97 Attachment 9.1

Table of Contents

Executive Summary 4 Current Feedback/Observations 10 Recommendations 14 Implementation Plan 18

Cultural Services 3 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 98 Attachment 9.1 Executive Summary

In January 2013, the Port Moody Team Action Plan was adopted Cultural Services has grown with the City of Port Moody for as a business plan to guide the organization to achieve over a decade, originating with the hiring of a Manager of optimal performance in the provision of service excellence to Cultural Services in 2001. The role of the manager changed and our residents, business community, Council, and employees. the department grew as services increased. The team now includes five regular staff and a number of part-time employees A key tactic in the Team Action Plan is the introduction of and volunteers throughout the community. This dedicated team Municipal Services Assessments to evaluate the efficiencies, works closely with the Arts & Culture Committee, established effectiveness, and deficiencies within each municipal service in 2009, and seeks to implement the vision outlined in the area. Every department will be assessed during 2013 and 2014 Committee’s Arts and Culture Master Plan 2011. by a review team comprised of senior City staff and outside subject matter experts. The department fulfills multiple roles within the organization and takes direction from a number of different sources. These A series of interviews took place with Cultural Services staff roles include: the managing and organizing of the Inlet Theatre as well as with internal and external stakeholders. The members facility as well as the adjacent Galleria in City Hall; organizing of the Cultural Services Municipal Service Assessment review public art projects; integrating cultural and artistic elements team were: into the work done organization-wide; providing crucial support • Remo Faedo, Fire Chief (Team Lead) to non-profit arts and culture community within the City; • Lynne Russell, Director of Library Services operating the City’s Artists Studios; overseeing of film shoots • Stephen Smith, Manager of Information Services within the Port Moody borders; and planning and executing • John Williams, Superintendent of Parks and Roads many City events. • Brigitte Pronovost, Manager of Administration and Budgeting Both internal and external stakeholders expressed a great • Oksana Dexter, Subject Matter Expert deal of respect for, and appreciation of the Cultural Services

4 Municiapal Service Assessment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 99 Attachment 9.1 division. It became apparent early in the review process that responsibilities have to be eliminated or suspended to allow for Cultural Services is experiencing several challenges that are new priorities. The division is struggling with determining how impacting its effectiveness. To address this situation, there is best to organize and how to continue to deliver services with a need to: increasing demand and decreasing grant funding.

• Clearly define the core business of Cultural Services There are many expectations from arts and culture stakeholders. • Review the organizational structure of the department Some relate these expectations to what the brand “City of • Clarify the role of Cultural Services in implementing the the Arts” means to them. Others indicated that the expectations Arts and Cultural Plan 2011 relate directly to the Arts and Culture Master Plan and how • Develop strategies for priority setting and workload it is implemented. Although unusual for an internal review to management place at Council level, it is felt that a clarification and a Council review of both the City of the Arts brand and the Arts and The varied responsibilities and demands placed on Cultural Culture Master Plan would help define the core business of Services have created a situation where priority setting and Cultural Services. workload management is difficult when current tasks and

Current Division Structure

General Manager Community Services

Manager Cultural Services

Front of House Theatre Coordinator Public Art Coordinator Events Assistant House Technician II Assistants (Auxiliary) RPT (.60) RPT (.60) RPT (.60)

House Technician I (Auxiliary)

Cultural Services 5 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 100 Attachment 9.1 Current Financial Information

Cost Account Account Description Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual 3 Year Budget Centre Number 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 Average 2013

Culture-Admin 4479-210 Rev Own Src – Misc 0 -781 0 0 0 -75 -285 0 5406-210 TSF From Operating Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5900-210 Appropriation From Surplus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6000-210 Salaries – Regular 136,800 119,402 141,200 107,572 148,500 142,424 123,133 153,700 6001-210 Salaries – Wages 0 0 0 0 0 290 97 0 6001-210 Wages 0 0 0 0 0 0 6002-210 Salaries – O/T 0 167 0 21 0 458 215 0 6003-210 Salaries – Aux – I/S 0 597 0 9,950 0 3,256 4,601 0 6004-210 Salaries – Other 0 263 0 1,080 0 290 544 0 6009-210 Position Vacancy Savings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6101-210 Conventions, Dues & Act. 2,154 1,073 2,176 1,552 2,219 2,056 1,561 2,264 6104-210 Mileage/Vehicle Allow. 631 74 638 94 650 125 98 228 6112-210 Training & Education – Dept 2,134 2,487 2,155 3,096 1,300 1,540 2,374 2,181 6201-210 Rebill Labour Offset 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7022-210 Tourism 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7300-210 Advertising 2,149 1,746 2,170 2,528 4,214 2,273 2,182 2,078 7402-210 Insurance – Property 0 117 0 114 0 102 111 105 7613-210 Maintenance Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7615-210 Miscellaneous Supplies 432 236 436 766 445 191 398 501 7619-210 Supplies – Program Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7624-210 Supplies – Signs 0 245 0 89 0 370 235 0 7625-210 Office Supplies 707 1,079 714 1,117 728 527 907 1,162 7626-210 Suppl – Standard Office Supplies 0 0 0 125 42 0 7704-210 Equip – Non-Capitalized 0 0 0 1,845 615 0 7707-210 Vehicle Charges 4,614 3,427 4,660 3,541 4,705 3,574 3,514 3,989 7901-210 Bank Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7908-210 Council Tribute To The Arts 879 925 887 875 905 785 862 923 7924-210 Sdry – Licenses&Royalties 0 0 0 -330 -110 0 7927-210 Miscellaneous Expenses 0 273 0 1,044 0 824 714 2,725 150,500 131,330 155,037 133,440 163,667 160,649 141,806 169,857 Film Industry 4228-211 Film Shoot -10,000 -4,083 -10,000 -7,789 -10,000 -7,598 -6,490 -5,000 6001-211 Wages 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6002-211 Salaries – O/T 4,800 0 4,800 0 4,800 1,953 651 0 7619-211 Supplies – Program Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7927-211 Miscellaneous Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -5,200 -4,083 -5,200 -7,789 -5,200 -5,645 -5,839 -5,000

6 Municiapal Service Assessment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 101 Attachment 9.1 Cost Account Account Description Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual 3 Year Budget Centre Number 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 Average 2013

General Events 5406-212 TSF From Operating Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6000-212 Salaries 0 2,035 0 1,705 0 21,256 8,332 21,000 6001-212 Wages 48,300 2,546 41,100 4,867 46,200 5,343 4,252 22,900 6002-212 Salaries – O/T 0 823 0 480 0 1,310 871 0 6003-212 Salaries – Aux – I/S 0 36,403 0 47,389 0 8,625 30,806 0 6004-212 Salaries – Other 0 0 0 0 0 -67 -22 0 6006-212 Salaries – O/T 0 4,453 0 7,618 0 6,595 6,222 0 6101-212 Conventions, Dues & Act. 0 0 0 73 0 0 24 0 6104-212 Mileage/Vehicle Allow. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6201-212 Rebill Labour Offset 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7000-212 Banner Program 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7004-212 Contr Svc – Contractors/Builders 0 0 0 4,121 1,374 0 7300-212 Communications – Advertising 0 0 0 0 3,000 0 0 0 7615-212 Miscellaneous Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7619-212 Suppl – Prog. Supplies 0 0 0 36 12 0 7627-212 Supplies – Technical Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7927-212 Miscellaneous Exp 38,607 33,366 38,993 30,995 39,783 34,436 32,932 35,000 7937-212 Sdry – US Exchange 0 0 0 0 0 78 26 0 9406-212 TSF To Operating Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86,907 79,626 80,093 93,127 88,983 81,732 84,828 78,900 Arts Centre – Prog 7006-214 Fee For Service 174,814 174,813 176,562 176,560 188,700 188,700 180,024 192,474 7008-214 Film Developing Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7613-214 Supplies – Maint Supplies 0 0 0 102 0 0 34 0 174,814 174,813 176,562 176,662 188,700 188,700 180,058 192,474 Museum – Prog 7006-217 Fee For Svce 75,385 76,131 76,139 76,139 77,661 77,661 76,644 79,215 7402-217 Insurance – Property 0 0 0 0 3,232 0 0 1,700 75,385 76,131 76,139 76,139 80,893 77,661 76,644 80,915 ArtsConnect – Prog 4229-218 Svcs-Rec-Lease & Rentals-General Rentals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5900-218 Accumulated Surplus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7006-218 Fee For Svce 5,254 5,254 5,307 5,307 5,413 5,413 5,325 5,521 6001-219 Salary & Benefits – Wages 0 0 40 0 5,254 5,254 5,307 5,307 5,413 5,453 5,338 5,521

Cultural Services 7 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 102 Attachment 9.1 Cost Account Account Description Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual 3 Year Budget Centre Number 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 Average 2013

Inlet Theatre - Bldg 4479-215 Rev Own Src – Other – Misc. Revenue 0 -3,778 -3,000 -3,098 -3,000 -4,022 -3,633 -3,500 5406-215 TSF From Operating Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5504-215 TSF From Life Cycle Reserve 0 -440 0 0 0 0 -147 0 6000-215 Salaries – Regular 93,080 95,670 110,800 112,912 116,600 114,632 107,738 122,000 6000-215 House Technician – Regular 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6001-215 Salaries – Wages 3,016 320 3,100 1,317 3,100 1,118 918 3,200 6002-215 Salaries – O/T 0 989 0 295 0 175 486 0 6003-215 Auxilliary Technician 32,500 36,769 38,600 46,284 40,700 53,771 45,608 46,600 6004-215 Salaries – Other 0 1,085 0 644 0 760 830 0 6006-215 Salaries – O/T – O/S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6009-215 Position Vacancy Savings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7004-215 Contractors/Builders 424 0 428 0 437 211 70 446 7611-215 Janitorial Supplies 576 0 581 97 593 0 32 0 7613-215 Maintenance Supplies 3,737 4,077 3,774 942 3,850 1,863 2,294 3,927 7619-215 Supplies – Program Supplies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7704-215 Non-Capitalized 5,909 7,832 5,968 8,659 9,027 7,514 8,002 7,202 7712-215 Theatre Maintenance 0 0 4,000 5,178 4,080 70 1,749 4,162 7924-215 Licenses & Royalties 707 364 714 560 728 841 588 743 7927-215 Miscellaneous Expenses 0 1,904 1,500 1,293 1,530 1,486 1,561 1,756 9406-215 TSF To Operating Reserve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,948 144,793 166,466 175,084 177,645 178,416 166,097 186,535 Inlet Theatre - Prog 4222-216 Program Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4227-216 Broadcast Centre Rental -3,900 -4,032 -3,939 -3,394 -4,018 0 -2,475 -3,253 4229-216 General Rentals -50,160 -88,051 -60,000 -89,891 -66,000 -90,186 -89,376 -75,000 4479-216 Rev Own Src – Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5406-216 TSF From Operating Reserve 0 -500 0 0 0 0 -167 0 6003-216 Salaries & Benefits – Aux – I/S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7619-216 Program Supplies 4,040 4,064 4,080 1,377 4,162 3,530 2,990 3,033 7906-216 Cost Recoveries 0 -4,111 0 -4,316 0 -3,482 -3,969 0 7907-216 Council Meetings 737 0 745 1,249 760 122 457 775 7927-216 Sundry – Miscellaneous Exp 0 0 0 0 0 300 100 0 7931-216 Recoverable Expenses 0 3,930 0 3,672 0 3,441 3,681 0 8001-216 Grant – Waiver Of Rent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -49,283 -88,700 -59,114 -91,303 -65,096 -86,275 -88,759 -74,445

8 Municiapal Service Assessment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 103 Attachment 9.1 Cost Account Account Description Budget Actual Budget Actual Budget Actual 3 Year Budget Centre Number 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 Average 2013

Youth Festival 4479-220 Rv – Oth – Misc Revenue 0 0 0 -872 -291 0 6000-220 Salary & Benefits – Salaries 0 0 0 635 212 0 6002-220 Salary & Benefits – Overtime – I/S 0 0 0 99 33 0 6003-220 Salaries – Aux – I/S 0 0 0 0 0 2,480 827 4,100 7300-220 Communic – Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,000 7927-220 Sundry – Miscellaneous Exp 0 0 0 0 0 3,872 1,291 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 6,214 2,071 10,100 Arts & Culture Committee 7300-221 Advertising 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 7004-221 Contr Svc-Contractors/Builders 0 0 0 0 0 7,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,500 Vehicle 7403-225 Insurance 1,432 949 1,446 967 1,475 1,047 988 1,050 7702-225 Fuel 923 286 932 395 950 169 283 600 7703-225 Maintenance 659 592 666 578 679 758 643 739 7706-225 Replacement Provision 1,600 1,600 1,616 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 7708-225 Charge-Out Recovery -4,614 -3,427 -4,660 -3,541 -4,705 -3,574 -3,514 -3,989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 578,325 519,164 595,289 560,666 635,005 606,906 562,245 654,356

Cultural Services 9 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 104 Attachment 9.1 Current Feedback/Observations services. It was a bold move by the Council and City staff of the Overview day to make this the tag line for the City. This heart-felt value Those staff members who were interviewed ranged from five has held for almost 15 years. For the outside observer, watching years to upwards of 15 years of service with the City of Port the Arts Centre expand with the new heritage building annex, Moody. Most positions within the division are specialized and knowing that recently the Heritage Society with Station Museum have little to no cross-over opportunities except for clerical staff published the “Tracks of Time, Port Moody’s First 100 Years”, or administrative duties. Despite these focused roles, there is a that the Film Festival continues to thrive, and the special events common emphasis on customer service and organizational in the Park welcome residents and visitors alike all year long, skills. When asked about notable skills staff members possessed, Port Moody is a good and healthy place for the arts, culture event planning and technical skills were prominent. As for and heritage. Cultural Services staff should be commended for hidden skills which are not currently used, staff reported various their commitment. The role of the passionate and hard working artistic abilities, website management, and communication volunteers is the fire that keeps it all ignited. skills. The many functions carried out by staff are commonly understood and all were well aware that, to a large extent, they Technical – Strategy, Service Delivery, are the vital team that is expected to keep the “City of the Arts” Policies, and Processes brand current and consistent. However, Staff were unaware of the precise future for this brand and how it is to be maintained During the interview process the participants were asked which and grown within existing resources. Although Cultural Services services, if any, were provided efficiently and effectively, and staff understand the core business of the division, many alternatively which services, if any, were not provided effectively stakeholders believe that it should be more clearly defined and efficiently. Several responses for both questions focused and mandated. on event provision and organization. In general the consensus was that for the events which are Cultural Services’ product, It was suggested that to truly be the City of the Arts there needs to the team’s delivery was considered good to exceptional. be a stronger visual expression that makes it a reality to everyone who comes to the City of Port Moody. Suggestions included: colourful houses, colourful crosswalks, “monumental” art pieces; and more “artsy” signs. This larger vision is expressed vividly in the Arts and Culture Master Plan, the City’s guiding document for the division and the Arts and Culture Committee, and many in the arts community have embraced it. While broader than the mandate of Cultural Services, it is mentioned here as two stakeholders felt very strongly about the issue. The strategies adopted in the plan did not come with commensurate resources for implementation. Many in the arts community feel it is a significant part of Cultural Service’s role and responsibility to embrace this concept and it is a failure of the division that more is not done to reflect this brand.

Despite these current sentiments, in the relatively short time that Port Moody has been the “City of the Arts”, there has been significant growth and stablility of arts, culture and heritage activity. A comparison with cities of equal or greater populations shows that Port Moody’s policies and funding compare favourably. Communication with arts, culture and heritage stakeholders is an important process, so that these stakeholders can understand that the “City of the Arts” brand is a reflection of the beliefs, values and work of the Council and staff of the City. It is something that every resident can be proud of as it bolsters the City’s commitment to the environment, recycling, parks, recreation, and other key municipal

10 Municiapal Service Assessment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 105 Attachment 9.1 Notably, the division is very good at direct service provision at the theatre, exhibits in the galleria, and special events in the parks. The online event listings have also greatly improved according to both internal and external stakeholders.

Despite the majority of respondents praising the handling of events there were also a few concerns. For some, the event support provided to them by Cultural Services was lacking. One respondent claimed that their event had not received equal treatment and was eager to speak to someone in person to resolve what they see as an emerging conflict.

Some internal clients felt that once booked, the division delivers well, but there was no formal system for booking City parks a large amount of the work undertaken by the division. On the for special events. The largest issue that was raised by different heels of intense activity during the Centennial celebrations of stakeholders was the ownership of events. It should be 2013, this directive has led to a number of workload challenges mentioned that this issue is wider than the division itself, but for the small team. The Arts and Culture Committee is expecting considering that event delivery is a key service of the division, program delivery without much strategic direction. The the concerns are relevant. Events are intended to be community imperative question is, whether staff drive initiatives or if the driven, but Cultural Services does most of the work and is committee does. Currently, the level of operational input from seen to be responsible for the events’ success. In some instances the Arts and Culture Committee seems atypical of similar the team is approached once an event is well underway in staff/committee relationships. The present operational model planning and when logistical or policy limitations require is best described as a facilitator model which may be contributing changes to the project, organizers are frustrated that Cultural to the impression that the division is not meeting the Arts Services cannot fulfill their plans. and Cultural Committee’s and Council’s expectations. Although There were two housekeeping items that need to be proud of their work and capable of providing the present addressed. One was the potential for increasing usage rates services, some staff members questioned whether they were at the Inlet Theatre, such as weddings, and the second was performing the “right work”. improperly billing GST to non-profits organizations and the One internal stakeholder indicated that Cultural Services staff need to improve this practice. seem to have a “lack of control” over their time and priorities. The The team is technically proficient. They are responsible for the overall feeling is that in order to manage their operation within operations of the theatre, which can be described as a large established staffing budget, Cultural Services needs to gain more multi-purpose room which sees a broad range of performances control over their strategic priorities. This is linked to defining or and other events with varied requirements. It also serves as redefining the core business of Cultural Services. This will require the City Council chambers. As with all processes, there are areas intervention and direction from the executive level, as current that were identified for improvement. tasks are entrenched and some external stakeholders believe the department should be able to embrace all the projects From internal stakeholders, there were concerns that to book without a problem. the theatre for civic use the schedule has to be confirmed and approved through a single position. As this position is part-time, It is important to recognize that the City of Port Moody is not the process can be delayed. In addition, there is a desire large enough or staffed fully enough to compete with larger to see Cultural Services be more proactive and supportive of municipalities in respect to all artistic and cultural categories. using the tools required by other departments in order to Council needs to be clear as to what the focus is: physical art; ensure workflow is consistent and concise. Some of the external partnerships within the community; arts programs; or arts stakeholders and renters using the theatre were looking facilities. Furthermore, no matter how it is finally decided that for improved technical services to make their presentations the division should operate, Cultural Services needs to be capable of more sophisticated production values. aggressive in getting what is required in order to fulfill their role within the organization. One of the largest challenges for Cultural Services is how to best organize. With the growth of the City came the formation The lack of strategic planning and the confusion around service of the Arts and Culture Committee which has the mandate to levels and priorities has resulted in high workloads and mounting implement the Arts and Culture Master Plan. This now influences challenges for the division. This is not an unusual circumstance

Cultural Services 11 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 106 Attachment 9.1 It was mentioned that communications between the division and other business units within the organization has markedly improved in the past months. The division has worked to connect across the organization more effectively but they have not been able to shake a perception that they isolate themselves. It was mentioned by internal stakeholders, that this mode of self-preservation is perceived as negativity to new ideas and initiatives and that the operation is in “crisis-mode”. Some of the barriers erected by Cultural Services feel artificial to stakeholders. For example, the practice of charging back for Cultural Services employees’ time is not well understood by those outside the department and seem to validate this opinion. Committee suggestions and sub-committee direction, and members of Council coming directly to the division to action initiatives could also be feeding this resistance to ideas.

Cultural Services was initially set up to manage the Inlet Theatre and then to facilitate opportunities for arts and culture to where community demand for service outstrips the internal fiscal flourish in the City, supporting the non-profit organizations limitations of a department. The Arts and Culture Master Plan with the groups themselves doing the work. As volunteerism and its core strategies imply that the vision can be accomplished diminishes, some organizations like Arts Connect struggled to without a significant budgetary cost. It is clear from the maintain their service. As funding tightens from all government expectations of the committee and perhaps even Council that sources and sponsors reduce their contribution to operating and Cultural Services staff are being stretched. As willing as staff are regular events, even the major institutions like the Arts Centre to try to implement the strategies, there is neither time nor and the Station Museum must protect their core business, keep capacity and certainly not the budget to take on all the ideas. the sponsors that are their life blood, support their revenue Simultaneously, there is significant outcry from internal and generating programs and meet their obligations to their Boards external stakeholders if events or services are dropped or of Directors. The “arts assistance” agreements with their annual discontinued to accommodate new ones. In addition, the demands funding allocations have seen cost of living increases within placed upon the division from some regular tasks are unpredictable the Cultural Services budget which is a strong indication of such as filming, where even simple requests require significant the City’s commitment to stable funding for arts and heritage. support services. Additionally, Council meetings and special However, there have not been operating increases, thus the meetings are increasing in complexity and demand a signifigant capacity for growing arts, culture, and heritage services from amount of staff time to manage effectivly resulting in collateral these organizations has remained static except where they can impact on other responsiblities and services. find program revenues or specific project grants. Volunteers look to Cultural Services not only to facilitate but to actualize Communication & Team Morale and implement projects, celebrations and events, assuming Both internal and external stakeholders feel that for the most that resources are available at the municipal level. part Cultural Services staff are very good to work with, are Several of external stakeholders were asked about their working very helpful, and, overall, do a great job. They not only support relationship with the Cultural Services division. The common theme stakeholders, but bring everyone together by bridging the gap was that the staff members themselves are “awesome”, highly between the community and the arts. This speaks well for the functional facilitators who will work extremely hard to ensure individuals that have been working for the division for some their product is well supported. Their relationship with most groups time and it seems clear that they have built strong relationships. was well regarded. The division is viewed as an efficient liaison Internally, Cultural Services liaises most with the Legislative for funding, application deadlines, and grant support with its key Services, the City Manager’s Office, Facilities, Parks Services, non-profit societies such as Golden Spike Society, the Arts Centre Corporate Communications, Recreation Services, and Financial Society and the Heritage Society (that operates the Station Museum). Services. There are instances where Cultural Services has These non-profit organizations look to the division to advocate leveraged the work of other divisions and found ways to on their behalf to executive staff and elected officials. Many groups incorporate the City of the Arts brand into extra-departmental view them as a one stop shop for all municipal services related projects. However, there is greater opportunity for this type to special events, film shoots and other arts or heritage initiatives. of collaboration. The support provided to up and coming arts groups is fantastic

12 Municiapal Service Assessment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 107 Attachment 9.1 and many groups owe full credit to the support provided by not working on the website; restrictive communications Cultural Services. Not surprisingly, external groups have high standards; and general bureaucracy. As for their performance expectations of strong working relationships between Cultural management and succession planning, staff were given fairly Services and other departments throughout the organization. regular performance reviews however these are occasionally missed leaving unnecessary gaps in performance feedback. Two stakeholders referred to the fact that Arts Connect doesn’t Each staff member was also asked if they felt appreciated by seem to be as effective as previously, due possibly to a decrease both their coworkers and the community which they support. in grant funding. In fact, Arts Connect has had significant internal Most felt that they were appreciated by their co-workers, challenges with recruiting board members and redirecting their division and customers, but not always by the City or council. resources to projects. As a result of not being fully accountable, the City of Port Moody has withheld funding although that As for life and work balance the team reported feeling satisfied. funding is still in the Cultural Services budget. Arts Connect Only the part time staff reported feeling slightly disconnected coordinate most of the promotion in the Tri-City area. As a result, from the daily changes and operations. A follow-up question it was suggested that Cultural Services might take a bigger role as to whether or not each team member felt adequately in connecting groups and promoting activity both within Port remunerated found that the team is satisfied and feels like they Moody and across the Tri-Cities. Stakeholders commented that are paid well compared to private industry and competitive Coquitlam offers far more than Port Moody with respect to with the municipal standard. grants, etc. Most arts groups apply to all three municipalities because they serve the residents across municipal boundaries. People, Leadership & Structure Operating grants have almost completely dried up from the As with all other divisions within the organization, Cultural Province and the Lottery Corp; therefore, arts organization Services is staffed fairly lean. With infrastructure degradation must apply for “project grants” with little room in the budget posing common challenges for nearly all municipalities, labour to support the staffing and operating of an organization. expenditures are a mounting cost. The demands on Cultural Some external stakeholders would like to see Cultural Services Services have continued to increase without corresponding advocate on their behalf for better support. staffing increases. However, as previously noted, should Council There is a strong feeling that the division should take a revisit the service levels and strategic organization of the leadership role in the area of promotion since many previous department it may be necessary to lower service levels or increase services such as City Soup and the Arts Connect website have staffing contingent on the model and direction desired. become defunct or fallen into disrepair. Additionally, nearly all Currently, the staffing levels and scheduling may not meet the external respondents asked for more advertising using the needs of the organization or fulfill the expectations of the public. City’s advertising boards at the Ioco/Newport main entrance With the many part-time employees some questions can go to the civic complex. Some felt that promotion by the City unanswered for several business days. One suggestion was to needs to be expanded, as the residents of Port Moody are often better use existing staff by increasing hours during busy periods not aware of events and performing arts events are not filling and to have the manager delegate more duties. Even this may the Inlet Theatre. In a crowded advertising world, it is difficult result in some budgetary creep, as there are part-time limits for arts events to be noticed so arts groups look to Cultural that affect benefits. In terms of leadership, staff generally feels Services to provide a coordinated and more cost effective that they receive enough direction for their duties and that promotional service. However, external stakeholders do not their supervisor is helpful, but not always around. In these cases, understand the “brand consistently and design guidelines” there is no one else to go to when the supervisor is not available. that exist in the City. These limit Cultural Services staff ability to fulfil this need on the municipal website or on social media.

In general, those interviewed had general issues with the municipality as a whole and less with the division specifically. There is a demand for a greater focus on the arts, culture, and heritage recognition by Council and senior management. And in this vein, they expect Cultural Services to be their constant advocate; a role they do not feel the division currently fulfills.

All team members interviewed were asked if they felt that they were afforded the opportunity to reach their full potential. The majority felt that they are not. The common obstacles identified were: administrative restrictions, such as managing folders in RPM; Cultural Services 13 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 108 Attachment 9.1 Recommendations

priorities and adjust tasks between quieter times in the off Divisional Relationships, Strategy season and very busy times during the spring and summer. and Leadership This relationship is viewed by some as dysfunctional and by The Arts and Culture Committee is a major factor in the others as simply a sign of the times: when community demands direction and workload of the Cultural Services division. Within cannot be met within tight budget restriction, and resources their terms of reference and in the Arts and Culture Master for any new initiatives are not easily found. Plan they are mandated to establish the priorities of the plan and implement it with the help of the Cultural Services Manager. This situation requires Council consideration because any This mandate is unusual for a municipal committee which is changes must be part of the Committee’s terms of reference. usually engaged for advisory policy direction. The Arts and Cultural Master Plan is an outstanding document, but it does not contain any analysis or working Due to the passion and commitment of the appointed arts models of resource allocation for the implementation advocates and volunteer representatives of the key cultural of the various objectives. Short and long term allocation institutions, it is not surprising to see them working hard to of resources should be identified to make sure that a create a truly artistic community. Nonetheless, this relationship particular strategy can be sustained over the long term. has impacted the ability of the division to set workload This includes additional resources to the Arts Centre or

14 Municiapal Service Assessment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 109 Attachment 9.1 the Station Museum as a fee for service if they are expected to the responsibilities of the Cultural Services team. If the to implement the strategy. “City of the Arts” is an internal operating culture, where staff in all departments look for opportunities to exhibit an arts Finally, when the City of Port Moody took on the moniker viewpoint in their day-to-day work, capital projects embrace “City of the Arts” in 2002, the enthusiasm and excitement of public art as part of their design and bylaws and regulations the community was enormous. Now, people interpret it in include this sensibility for citizens and business, then this many different ways. It is a powerful call to keep the arts a approach can be defended and implemented. consideration in all municipal decisions. Unfortunately, some stakeholders in the community believe that it should Special Events become externally obvious for all to see with large iconic sculptures and painted streets among other things. How Council The Cultural Services division is the “go to” place for special chooses to interpret this slogan has to be communicated to events. They are very successful at organizing and supporting the arts community and to the general public. It has receded the many events that are annual benchmarks of how the from municipal public communication tools over time residents feel about celebrating Port Moody. Whether the and this causes many stakeholders consternation. They events are well attended or rained out, the Cultural Services fear that municipal commitment to arts and culture is division carries a great deal of responsibility for the result. diminishing, and the Cultural Services division is failing the Special Events impact the Cultural Services division but also arts as a result. many divisions in the City, such as Park Services, Facilities, Despite the strong relationships and praise, there exists a Maintenance, Police, Fire Rescue, Corporate Communication tension between Cultural Services and some external and others. Cultural Services is the hub where internal and stakeholders and their complaints come directly to Council external organizers come to get things done. Most often the causing frustration. It may be impossible for Cultural Services costs of all this service are hidden within the various operational to address this issue, but there was a shared opinion that budgets but more and more communities want to know what Cultural Services should reach out more to:

• promote exchanges and event-sharing among cultural groups • promote arts and events in the community with local schools • partner with local businesses for sponsorships and ideas and that this would alleviate some of the concerns.

Stakeholders expressed a deficit regarding strategic leadership of cultural services in a number of areas. There is a sense that Arts & Culture is supported well versus being developed with the strategic guidance by City staff. The General Manager of Community Services is encouraged to take a more active role in liaising with community groups and ensuring all stakeholders are supported both internally and externally. Technical – Strategy, Service Delivery, Policies, and Processes Moving forward there is an obvious demand for Council to determine the role of the Arts and Culture Committee. Council should determine whether they want the committee to provide high-level strategic overviews or if they want them to provide low-level program creation. Whatever is decided, if Council wants to change the model it is necessary to address whether the division is structured to meet the demands of the model and to determine and reconcile the costs associated with a notable service level increase.

Council should re-define/clarify what external stakeholders expect from the “City of the Arts” brand and how that relates

Cultural Services 15 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 110 Attachment 9.1 these events cost. A review would help decision-makers assess which events are really important and which can be dropped Divisional Structure and from the calendar due to changing demographics and Core Services community volunteerism. The analysis would include special This is a small but busy division with only two full-time staff events across the City and would set clear standards and (the Cultural Services Manager and House Technican II) and three requirements. There are some events that are “grandfathered” part-time staff with very specific responsibilities. In addition due to their longevity and others that feel they are not receiving there are “on call” crew. This division provides an enormous service full support. Sponsorship is getting harder to find. It would and has a high profile in the community. As issues are addressed, be valuable for the City to have a look at the community staff re-organization will be necessary. Additional staff or more hours engagement, participation, volunteer involvement and for part-time staff may be suggested. Many work hours take the true cost of each event. This review may also determine place behind the scenes and are not visible to other municipal staff. a more functional corporate model for event planning Criticism arises that people are not around during normal business and delivery. hours. This complaint should be addressed when reorganizing This analysis would also look at how new events are added to staff responsibilities. Increases in time for an administrative the calendar. Without stifling enthusiastic community planners, assistant is a possible solution. Culture Services staff are loyal a clear policy statement should be established for fairness. and express their satisfaction working for the City as seen by During this review, the booking system, timing of approvals, their longevity in their positions. They carry a lot of institutional housekeeping items of GST billing and communication, memory. Dedicated professional development time is often staff impact, shared resources between divisions should all be lost in workload assignment and budget crunches. For this reviewed and procedures established to increase the efficiency small division to become strategically successful, professional to the benefit of all. development and training opportunity are very important.

16 Municiapal Service Assessment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 111 Attachment 9.1 New Divisional Structure

General Manager Community Services

Manager Cultural Services

Theatre Head Public Art Coordinator Events Assistant (Previously House Technician II) RPT (.60) RPT (.60)

House Technician I (Auxiliary)

Theatre Coordinator RPT (.60)

Front of House Assistants (Auxiliary)

Cultural Services 17 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 (Revised) 112 Attachment 9.1 Implementation Plan

# Category Action Item Priority 1 Strategy & Leadership Seek clarity on the role of the Arts and Culture Committee regarding their terms of High reference as policy advisors or operational priority directors for cultural services.

2 Strategy & Leadership Seek clarity on Council’s vision and expectations on the “City of the Arts” brand to High assist in aligning the goals and responsibilities of the Cultural Services team.

3 Strategy & Leadership General Manager of Community Services to take a lead role in liaising between High Arts & Culture Committee, Council, Arts Centre and staff.

4 Policy & Procedure Initiate a process to review the strategies and implementation objectives of the High Arts & Culture Master Plan.

5 Policy & Procedure Establish a special events policy with procedures, services provided and resources High available to provide all organizers with equivalent support.

6 Technical Establish a formal system for booking special events in parks. Medium

7 Technical Establish an internal system for prompt response to bookings of civic functions in Medium the Inlet Theatre and Galleria.

8 Technical Improve use of interdepartmental tools to ensure workflow is consistent and concise. Medium

9 People & Structure Increase the hours of part-time staff during busy periods in a planned workload Medium schedule, subject to funding.

10 People & Structure Have Cultural Services Manager delegate some of his duties to staff where it makes Medium administrative or operational sense.

11 People & Structure Reclassify the House Technician II position to a Theatre Head to provide a Medium consistent back-up to the manager and to separate the function and workloads of the Inlet Theatre.

12 People & Structure Look for efficiences that can be realized from working with other departments or Medium delegating to other work teams.

13 Technical Re-evaluate the process for reviewing rental/service rates. Low

14 Technical Look at GST billing practices and establish a consistent process for all non-profits. Low

18 Municiapal Service Assessment

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

This Page Intentionally Left Blank Council Agenda Information COW [X] Regular Council February 10, 2015 115 Attachment 9.2

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendatioin to Council

Date: January 6,2015 File No. 14-7200-05

Submitted by: Fire-Rescue Department

Subject: Marine Fire Response Options

Purpose / Introduction To seek Council direction on the level and types of marine fire response service that staff should pursue for the City of Port Moody.

Recommended Resolutions

THAT Option 1 - Purchasing Marine Fire Response Service from the City of Vancouver, as recommended in the report from the Fire-Rescue Department regarding Marine Fire Response Options dated January 6, 2015, be approved;

AND THAT additional funds of $15,000 for Fire Boat operating costs be considered during budget deliberations.

Background A Fire Boat Consortium Agreement was signed on August 27, 1991 and expired on August 27, 2011. The agreement was made between the Vancouver Port Corporation (now Port Metro Vancouver) and five port cities located along Burrard Inlet (City of Vancouver, City and District of North Vancouver, City of Burnaby, and City of Port Moody), and set out the terms for the operating, funding, and management of five fire boats to provide Marine Fire Protection Services. The Consortium is currently operating under an extension agreement that was agreed to by all parties except for the City of Burnaby who as opted out of the agreement. The Consortium is set to dissolve at the end of 2015 and the parties have been exploring options for provision of Marine Fire Protection Services.

Over the life of the consortium agreement, the City has not experienced many boat fires; however, since the beginning of the fire boat consortium on August 27, 1991, there have been two very large boat fires, both at Reed Point Marina. Between 2007 and 2013, Port Moody Fire Rescue (PMFR) has averaged approximately two Fire Boat calls per year in the Port Moody Harbour. The yearly average of calls per year rises to three if one includes the PMFR fire boat responses to other consortium members' jurisdiction.

1 Document: 294191 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 116 Attachment 9.2 Report/Recommendation to Council Marine Fire Response Options January 6, 2015

Typical fire boat emergency responses by PMFR include medical aid, rescue for tipped kayaks and canoes, vessels on fire in the harbour, and boat fires at Reed Point Marina. Non-emergency calls include Haz-Mat spills and public safety patrol during public events (fireworks display).

Discussion Staff have reviewed the following six options:

Option 1 (Recommended) - Purchasing Marine Fire Response Service from the City of Vancouver

On May 26, 2014 the City of Vancouver met with the Port Moody City Manager and Fire Chief to present their "Vancouver Marine Fire Response Service" option available to neighbouring port cities (Attachment #1). The following are some highlights of the presentation:

Fireboats • Two boats with a 12m (36.37ft) length and 1m (3.28ft) draft. • Pumping capacity of 3,500 US gallons per minute (gpm) while manoeuvring & 7,000 US gpm while anchored or docked. • On call 24/7 and a targeted 30 minute response time. • Firefighters trained in marine and shoreline firefighting tactics and all-hazard emergency response.

Terms & Fees » 15 year contract term. • Annual fee of $40,000.00 • Annual call limit of 4. • Call fee of $6000.00 for calls over annual call limit, e Maximum call duration of 4 hours. • Extended call fee of $1500.00 per hour for calls over 4 hours. » Non-subscriber fee of $60,000.00 for 4 hours and $6,000.00 per hour for calls over 4 hours.

Port Metro Vancouver will be participating in the operating costs (confirmed) by contributing an annual fee of $290,000.00.

The neighbouring port cities offered the "Vancouver Marine Fire Response Service" include the City of North Vancouver, the District of North Vancouver, the City of West Vancouver, the City of Burnaby and the City of Port Moody. The fee structure is the same for all these cities. The City of Vancouver's annual contribution is estimated at $580,000.00. The City of Burnaby has decided not to participate.

Staff Concerns ® The 30 minute targeted response time would be under ideal conditions and is calculated from a proposed location at the foot of Victoria Drive.

2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 117 Attachment 9.2 Report/Recommendation to Council Marine Fire Response Options January 6, 2015

• The response time from the existing fire boat location near the Seabus Terminal is estimated to be 42 minutes under ideal conditions.

Option 2 - Purchasing a Port Moody owned fire boat operated by Fire-Rescue only (Police would not share this boat). The service provided with this type of boat (Attachment #2) would be different than the Vancouver Marine Fire Response Service but the Department feels it could maintain current response times to the Port Moody harbour and eliminate response conflicts as this would be an exclusive Port Moody fire boat, and ensure long term continuance of marine fire fighting capabilities.

PMFR currently has an operating budget of approximately $25,000 allocated to costs related to the operation and maintenance of the three fire boats operated by the Consortium. That annual budget could be put towards the purchase or lease or of a fire boat, estimated to cost approximately $300,000. The useful life of the boat is estimated to be conservatively 15 years. The City could enter into a lease with the Municipal Finance Authority (MFA). Leasing a $300,000 fireboat over 15 years would cost approximately $26,000 per year.

The costs of operating and maintaining the boat, including fuel, maintenance, insurance and potential moorage could add another approximately $20,800 annually to the current $25,000 Fire-Rescue budget, although staff do not have the data or experience of operating in-house fire boat services to provide an estimate with any certainty. An appropriate sized boat house (new) is estimated to cost approximately $100,000. The City could borrow the money from MFA with annual payments of approximately $20,900. The costs of training and staffing are already included in the Fire-Rescue budget in another cost center, and are therefore not a factor.

Option 3 - No fire boat service in Port Moody. This option would mean that the City would be relying entirely on land-based firefighting strategies. Although PMFR could fight most fires from land, there would be certain risks associated with this model. Specifically, there would be exposures to marinas along the waterfront, as well as exposures to wharfs, piers, forested areas and certain private residences that currently have boat-access only. Under this option, Port Moody could exercise the non- member option from Vancouver Marine Fire Response Service for $60,000.00 for 4 hrs per call or a Seaspan Marine Fire Response Option for $2500.00 per hour. A response under these options is based upon availability.

Option 4 - A Port Moody owned boat shared by the Port Moody Police Department (PMPD) and Port Moody Fire Rescue (PMFR). Representatives from PMPD and PMFR met to discuss the possibility of a shared boat and both parties agreed that a shared boat would be workable. Each department listed their respective operational necessities needed to meet their requirements. The operational necessities that were shared by both departments include storage, deck space, communications, navigation and vessel power equipment. There were two operational necessities that were not shared. The

3 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 118 Attachment 9.2 Report/Recommendation to Council Marine Fire Response Options January 6, 2015

PMPD require a rigid hull inflatable style of vessel for the ability of attaching to and boarding other vessels quickly and relatively safely. PMFR requires a water pump and monitors to deliver water streams on fires.

Staff has been provided with costs from a local vendor on the purchase and operation of two boats in different sizes. The smaller vessel at 30.5 feet has not been considered by staff as it has space and stability issues. The cost and particulars for the larger 33.5-foot boat (Polaris Inflatable boat) are provided below:

• Rigid hull inflatable (Attachment #3) • Twin 300hp outboard engines • Inboard V8 engine to power the water pump (1500 gallons per minute) • Navigational and other electronic instruments (radar, GPS, depth sounder, VHF radio) a The purchase cost is $372,107 (subject to US exchange rates) • The annual operating costs are estimated to be approximately $90,000 (boat lease, boathouse lease, maintenance, insurance, moorage, small contingency)

Option 5 - Marine Fire Response Service provided by Seaspan Marine.

Seaspan Marine operates three T-Class tugs, with water pumping capability, in the Vancouver Harbour. Their main usage is for ship docking and ship escort. One of the tugs is always staffed (24/7) and in service. The other two tugs, when not in service, are available and can be operated by call-out crews. When in service they are actively working 50% of the time. Their response time to Port Moody would be 1 hour at best.

The Seaspan tugs are available on an emergency call-out basis, for $2,500.00 per hour, without a formal agreement. Under this circumstance they would be under the direction of Port Moody Incident Command (IC) and the City would assume all liability for their activity in fire operations. Seaspan crews have minimal familiarity with the IC structure and have little training in marine and/or land based firefighting procedures. Currently they are not familiar with firefighting communications nor do they have compatible radio equipment on their vessels. ;

Seaspan Marine presented a proposal for contracted Marine Fire Protection Services for the three North Shore municipalities. The fee for the proposal was $55,000.00 for the first year and $35,000.00 for years 2-5. This contract included start-up training for the North Shore fire officers, exercises, ongoing training and the development of policy and procedures for all participants. The three North Shore municipalities declined the proposal and chose to purchase Marine Fire Response Services from the City of Vancouver.

Option 6 - Retrofitting a non-fire fighting vessel donated by Port Metro Vancouver (PMV).

Port Metro Vancouver has committed to purchase Marine Fire Response Services from the City of Vancouver. They are satisfied that their contribution to the Vancouver program covers their obligation for fire response for the whole Vancouver harbour including waterfront municipalities

4 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 119 Attachment 9.2 Report/Recommendation to Council Marine Fire Response Options January 6, 2015

within the harbour. Therefore they will not be offering support to any other individual municipality including the donation of one of their used vessels to the City of Port Moody.

Other Options THAT the report from the Fire-Rescue Department dated January 6, 2015 regarding Marine Fire Response Options be received for information.

Financial Implications Costs related to the purchase of the different marine fire protection models are summarized below. Staff recommends Option #1 given the significant costs related with operating a City owned boat, and the longer response times from private agencies. The recommendation is based on a compromise of reasonable response time and reasonable cost.

Estimated Estimated Estimated Purchase or Annual Response Service Option Start Up Operating Time Cost Costs (minutes) 1. Purchase service from VFRS (recommended) n/a $40,000 30

2. PMFR Fire Boat (not shared with PMPD) $300,000 $72,000 12

3. PMFR and PMPD Shared Boat $372,000 $90,000 12

4. Seaspan Marine Tugboat Response $50,000 $35,000 +60

5. No Fire Boat Service (pay as you use) © $0 $0 45/+60

O Call-out fee for VFRS Fire Boat is $60,000 for 4 hours, and $6,000 per hour beyond 4 hours. Call-out fee for Seaspan Marine is $2,500 per hour.

Communications / Civic Engagement External stakeholders should be informed of changes in marine fire protection in the Port Moody Harbour; however, these changes may not be implemented until 2016.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The replacement of the current consortium marine fire protection model with long term marine fire protection capabilities is consistent with Council's 2012 Strategic Plan Objectives of Planning for the Future and Excellence in Service Delivery.

Attachments: 1. Vancouver Marine Fire Response Service in the Inner Harbour - Presentation 2. Fire-Rescue Boat - Data Sheet 3. Rigid Hull Inflatable - Photo

5 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 120 Attachment 9.2 Report/Recommendation to Council Marine Fire Response Options January 6, 2015

Prepared by: fL P-x. Remo Faedo Fire Chief

Reviewed for Form and Content / Approved for Sujbrhis^ion to Council: City Manager's Comment/Concurrence

y City Manager Corporate Review /iTHtials Financial Services ( M Police

"O c CD ro £ m to CD CD U c^ o C" ^ O JD *E O co IP "Jo 0) C/J C g o y 3 > 6 gwmnai (X3 t 'si* S | CD E "O ^ c <0 u. D m CD k CD o o .CZSi X3 L- U u o on o ftl c/j 0 O fO m CD +J ^ C rd i, o c o Q. o ^C +-» c rc U u O fi3 CD T3 ra DO .H' l?5 '> o 3 C U 1 i' 8 o jn E r T k ^ en ^ CO o CL w- on uP Wu0) m00 m i/V m - b £ V) £ s o L— O CD to m CD t -Q CD ^ CD ^ > 5! > o u m O ^ 3 c ZJ E o o o CD o CD u ^ O Q. U CD i C CD C to c U ^ 4-j "g Cd C ro m •g C > .£ > >- > C ro 8 E CD -C o 0 •- ^ V 4_J 2 j= ^ 55 4^ 4_J V|_ CD v\ to I -2 CD ^ a; 4J CD c — "Oo ft U O J -C u C o *> t CD Q. ^ g O 5 ^ QJ i— ^ a. c +3 r0 to RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 123 Attachment 9.2

ctS CD

(U CD m CO ey to m m O tx JL_J ^ i'd r cu t/i fG c o o tJ E .h o U. u RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 124 Attachment 9.2 ¦ ^ yj > D qO ¦ U ;Z c CD on U is cu ;r: Q. ^ CJJ k m CD C F t/1 CD pj u ti O To _ D- U c/> UT' ^ r CO iJ O) C to B o Q. 9J C& u CD m cU fO ^ © >gpggs; m 4-J m 4—^ n3 fO g ra CD 3 "O L— ^ .5 cd > jd -r cu 5 l! O ^ 2 to i— o. CL i= «= E RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 125 Attachment 9.2

m c cu IP o s— c rsf (U CU > m CU L_ CU +J CU .SP u. m J+Z 3 CU CU 4J >N 4_J rd -C ton m vfi >% c o m o k_ m CU CU 4-» m CO

ft! m (U m +J Q. rd fy E CD Q. O) 3-1 CU 13 CU _c O ^ DO c o c rd s— CU T3 D m £ CU O CU „Q CO JZ U GO >V t {/I Vf_ CU m c CU o CU JD CU > DD CU > C 00 "fO ^ t/1 fO U -C oc; E +j o Op fQ n3 > "O RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 126 Attachment 9.2

CD .M O rd c r^ TJ cu on c t/J c fO CD rQ 0 ."15 .Q *toc "O m n3 E JZ o 4—* ii_ 4-1 O _c XI m u u m c ra on «M to >v fd IM» 3 > CD "X3S O u c* m c -O +J 4_J o CD CD an jQ >• u ^ c CD at o u *+3 13 $_ E , . ro Q. n3 >N JO c O c- CD >- CD • F, on <* % JD Ob CD > 4J ^ fO "O o > CD c T3 ai E L- "O aj C "O Q. CD n3 -Q O -Q n3 CD +_» ^ i_ 12 CD JH v_ CD u ra JC Oft °o L- O i_ c (0 3 % C|Z *f— > *5 .£ E u o "D "D CD CD "To u CD on fd rd +j TD O O 4J c TjS .£ f- C Q. 1/1 CD o o x CD CD _!/) fxj CD 4/1 £3 m *5 E Ck L- c m w 4-J F « on o I CD fO iZ tn LA c i_ o £5 Qi tp > m JD +J U- U- X c CD ^ § fO > > CD CD ra o o ca > y_ CO CO RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 127 Attachment 9.2

T3 C rd fM fC m o c O CQ 5 (N E ^ fe .y .£ Z3 Ltl o Q €L E exi 4_J o m cu fO > O 3 rd Q. o O O u -Q < > > -D CD an CO x: c ra 4-J o ¦D m C a; c QJ d) rd > CD (S) TJ m k_, <«— 4-1 rd Q r o >, -r- -Q -Q —' m m oj ai tx. c ^QJ S-. -*-> u s CD ^ CD s— rd o +-# tn m =3 4_J m CU rd k- s s ! (C cu , (D | 8. I:..,. ro +3 rd 0) O E >, QJ g1 rd t u CD 13 CD m O > uLa- rd mo RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 128 Attachment 9.2 cd yj

oO • U ¦+—* ;Z c +-> (D 0) to E 4— O "u •M CD CD u <§ C l/) CD M— ra « jmmmCD -D . s 4-J CD ¦Kpfi • flHl C * ¦ pWM 13 13 L- o Q. Z ro i- • jmmm CD i© u C E c on ~QJ c _a; • famm 4-J E o to to ¦a • |Hni to (/) X O c CD fO on a c CD > "B in 4-J H D- c O o o 4-J CD E to L_ o 4-> (0 L_ ti D c to CD ra to "O C E 4—' o C CD ¦ ¦ 03 U CD 4--> c u u rn -D 13 L—> L_ O 4-^¦ | -Q c 0 c CD to o fO CD u E CO V- o C JC CD s^_ O •M a RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 129 Attachment 9.2 >

ma) O D. Ui fii m .h CH f ^ ir! f!i & .b L. f/i fd

U RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 130 Attachment 9.2

Attachment 1

Twenty year consortium agreement signed in 1991 > City of Vancouver > City of North Vancouver > District of North Vancouver > City of Port Moody > City of Burnaby (until 2013) > Port Metro Vancouver

Two year extension to end of 2013 Currently extended on a month to month basis

CITY OF .3UVER RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 131 Attachment 9.2 "U c fO fNl c m

on C c o fO 4-J V) E \0 Cb © C. o i/v 'm m L_ CD Q. O 13 to H-. 4_J X! CA o •C w o 4-1 u CO on O o c u u cu jo L_ •M ^-* 03 •pr CD m Q- Q. m 5 0 QJ (u 3 S E cd m * 3 .9- cd .n S *ÿ 5*E o 4j c m o E cd u V- "g ^ QJ fO o «Q E <= E > cd cd S O a. td RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 132 Attachment 9.2

Inner Harbour Marine Fire Services: Attachment 1 reboat R all

§£ Fireboats Four 23-year old 12- Exceeded 20 year life expectancy; capabilities have not kept pace with increased activities in the inner harbour metre fireboats (one is out of service for major Limited abilities outside the inner harbour in poor weather repairs) Not designed to transport additional personnel & equipment

a Pumping Capacity 4FV * Total pumping capacity . Limited capacity for multi-stream firefighting ' 9,000of in-service GPM (3,000 boats: GPM

each)

Staff A Limited ability to fight fires aboard a ship due to lack of a 40 operators with Small Marine Firefighter training Vessel Operator Challenges with co-ordinating response, service levels, data Proficiency & Medical A3 collection, etc. with decentralized operation ^

training 'W -CITY -CI" OF ^ RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 133 Attachment 9.2

Marine Firefighting Potential: Benchmarkm ve

i mwi imimirnmm i fMI

New York 107,000+ GPM

Long Beach, CA 81M tonnes 82,000 GPM LA 54,200 gpm -LaVJL fldiaWI JSZl irfteL 75M tonnes Toronto 190M tonnes 42,000 GPM awi Seattle 38,000 gpm 1.5M tonnes iBiiS Vancouver's marina usage, port cargo tonnage & the value of shoreline properties have increased 16.2M tonnes Portland substantially since 1991. However, Vancouver's total 25,000 GPM fireboat pumping capacity has remained the same & now significantly trails other North American cities. 2.8M tonnes Vancouver (current) 9,000 GPM fljriPfiioilr 1 BOM* tonnes Port Cargo Tonnage "Based on PMV Cargo Tonnage = 1 fireboat RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 134 Attachment 9.2 0£L

m u o

(\y O RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 135 Attachment 9.2

Attachment 1

Annual and/or Annual Incident Fees Fees

Municipalities

II RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 136 Attachment 9.2

Attachment 1

Service Provider • City of Vancouver

Confirmed Subscriber • PMV

Potential Subscribers (in Discussions) • Bumaby • District of North Vancouver • City of North Vancouver • Port Moody • West Vancouver

'At ' v ;cvof b'P RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 137 Attachment 9.2

1. Firefighting Support, Shcrsh'ns £ Akrinas Customers: Munis & PMV; Incident Command: Land-based Fire Dept. • Provide boat and crew for shoreline structure fire fighting (residential, commercial, industrial).

Firefighting Support, Large Vessels (>75') • Customer: PMV; Incident Command: Ship captain. » Provide boat and crew trained in marine firefighting (new service) to f' A- ^ i . * i support large vessel fire fighting; will board ship but not enter hull.

3. Firefighting, Small Vessels (<75') • Customer: Individual & Munis; Incident Command: VF&RS. • Lead firefighting response to fires on small vessels.

ofcriTY OF Will respond as appropriate as a "vessel of opportunity" to medical/rescue incidents. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 138 Attachment 9.2

T3 C rd ~U i_ rd TJ u jC CU rd Of) VI JiC o *E on u u &_ c o "O 4J "O Q. IS u Q. c u ro rd rd rd OJ s_ i_ +_J CD DO 4) IE jc ~6 E s tn 4_J £ 4~> (A +-» jc rd rd m c cu O c/J l-, TJ o l/l _aj o C CD Q. to o x c u c _fd 2 8 to p«!«*» >, C O (d 'cn O JZ ^ cti cti L_ tn •M m Ct +_! c E " on T3 m > f0 c cd >% rd o ^ to CD U Id Oft JZ ro qj cd en c: rd u Z5 Oft c #OD ~o £ on > E o rd l™ % CD c Wl DO fC m *> £ u o > rd m E fd 0 £22283m rd CD !+_, E E 3 c 4j N C c cd t/j •C cti o m CO CD DO 'm £L "a O i/i c in tn to rd fO NO CD c u 'oil -a rd rd rd m {/? E ? = c >x 2 *_ ¦o TJ" f? O aJ E ' E urn Of) E % ro ¦jz "O "D

Attachment 1

If able to respond to a call, CoV will provide a boat and four-person crew with a target response time of 30 minutes (in the inner harbour; may be longer in poor weather).

Componen I Contract Term (years) 15 15

Annual Fee (indexed @ Vancouver CPI) $290,000 $40,000

Annual Call Limit = ¦ 15 4

Call Fee (> Annual Call Limit) $10,000 $6,000

Maximum Call Duration Unlimited 4 hours

Extended Call Fee (> Max Call Duration) NA $1,500 per hour

Outside Service Area Fee $1,500 per hour NA

$100 per person per Additional or Crew Only Fee (<40 persons) NA hour

Indemnification CoV Indemnified CoV Indemnified Less than 4 hours = $60,000 Non-Subscriber Fees NA Hourly rate after 4 hours = $6,000 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 140 Attachment 9.2

Attachment 1

$1,200,000 -i

Total: $1,070,000

5 Munidpalies* $1,000,000 - @ $40,000 (4%) each

District of $800,000 North Vancouver: $40,862 Op. $19,110 Cap. Total: $625,381

$600,000 Burnaby: $26,358 Cap.

City of North • Port Moody: Vancouver: I $16,204 Op. *5 Municipalities PMV: $164,740 (Capital $7,578 Cap. $400,000 $37,340 Op. include Burnaby, $17,462 Cap. covery Estimate) District of North Vancouver, City of North Vancouver, $200,000 Port Moody Et West Vancouver

$- 2014 Annual Operating Costs + Capital Estimated Annual Costs - Proposed offer ^ Clr^Q.y Recovery Estimate - Consortium Agreement RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 141 Attachment 9.2

Annual Operating Costs Estimate Maintenance per boat $50,000 Basic Training (Small Vessel Operator) $30,000 Operating & Admin (Fuel, Moorage, Insurance) $30,000 TOTAL OPERATING (excludes cost to purchase) $110,000 Capital Costs Fireboat Length Pumping Capacity Purchase Price Small 28' 1,250 GPM $300k - $400k CoV 40' 7,000 GPM ~$1.3M

The annual cost just to operate a basic stand-alone fireboat service (one small ximately $60,000 more than the $40,000 annual fee to contract the City of Vancouver's marine fire response service. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 142 Attachment 9.2

Attachment 1

Reduced Staff Time and Equal Cost • The annual fee under the City of Vancouver's contracted service model will be the same for each of the municipalities. • The proposed model does not require the municipality's staff time to manage a fireboat or train firefighters in marine response and fireboat operation.

Increased Service Level • Improved response coordination & data, collection • Ability to respond in all weather conditions and transport crew & equipment • Increased capabilities in marine firefighting (multi-stream firefighting potential & additional firefighter training)

A Safer Inner Harbour Through Collaboration • With contributions from PMV and municipalities, the inner harbour and surrounding shoreline will benefit from enhancements to the existing marine fire response service ' that are only possible through a ccst-sharing modeL

U-i " DUVER RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 143 Attachment 9.2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 144 Attachment 9.2

4 ^ mFfTqpn rriitis

U |4 ^

5ft!i2 1132 heHk V I'l It »6 VdflHiiiyi]?c!f ssicCP; r tft- V

gratia iihuiMtM'in LDiibtmction 1 i^. -jE. Beans inliu jii innmcnlil1) 72" nower on^rataO Mm laufliiiB ayh!]f;llay/!iH| water craft gate barclv rihI easUv lo^d jiut orila^tl cfv/ami TmtspfrlnnaniiDW&tfiii eiiiiiiimRiit anflftT^s

www.suil)oats.com RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 145 Attachment 9.2

NiiJi^nltîiiiijonailwalkinoîri;!!;^ ^ »i — ¦ HGHiyliy Mil till mi,: n tint hill iiuiiiitfitvr oi I'ft lion Lflngth-gp' •-x-ifT Htliroiiirnlh Û' linlllfiiltait ::^77- aJlDKMlh''-'- 3^0HPKoiliatif1atim' Enqliiu mtjUpKrhiiui liitDri'je mi^ggrflon ujitn sUErcturnl ladilnr avsicm uvur Eliu holm siaiiiiesskfiei !il!iniriii|'j for hiisli or siiiiMLur aiiiilie.ilions

¦tEertnc a rJuatcd in ttnitor • rrsturz ami 2 s wmm onehiteii iiisciinnies • AEtrtiii nisjitji! iiol'j iinJ utessfire niatcf • 72' uower nam u (He -FLieicapniiiMEiyallflnK • Six giieMscmI Imw ofiniNiirtiiiftiits •Drill iIijwi rjimLUililLiUliltilMJ WK^ H 'Gfout3 cQ]tiiiariiriBiiL34"lV]( D"H)i 20"n Inc-kalilr dry shir N • All Glecmcal cciimecfiEiii.s nra s^iEcjI nr ^tfiruroal 'fiiif'tfimfni Irtai iifim iHliLiiinoi i GV^ntraihr

P Lk

wmwi

4* toiiirtiiiiriMBtiiiiii IPIM! www.suiiioats,Goni 1 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 146 Attachment 9.2 Council Agenda Information D Regular Council February 10, 2015 147 Attachment 9.3

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendation to Council

Date: February 2, 2015 File No. 6430-08

Submitted by: Development Services - Planning Division

Subject: Proposed Amendments to Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955

Purpose /Introduction To present for Council consideration amendments to Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 to address Metro Vancouver's concerns related to Port Moody's Regional Context Statement.

Recommended Resolutions

THAT Bylaw No. 3001, cited as City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 4, 2015, No. 3001 be read a first time.

THAT Bylaw No. 3001 be read a second time.

THAT Bylaw No. 3001 be referred to the following agencies for comments:

• City of Burnaby, City of Coquitlam, Village of Anmore, Village of Belcarra • First Nations including Musqueam Nation, Kwikwetlem First Nation, Sto:lo Nation, Sto:lo Tribal Council, Skawahlook First Nation, Soowahlie First Nation, Seabird Island Band, Shxw'owhamel First Nation, Lyackson First Nation, Penelakut Tribe, Hul'qumi'num Treaty Group, Stz'uminus First Nation, Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, Lake Cowichan First Nation, Squamish Nation, Tsleii-Waututh Nation and Katsie First Nation • School District 43 • Translink • Port Metro Vancouver • BC Ministry of Environment • Fisheries and Oceans Canada

AND THAT Bylaw No. 3001 be referred to a Public Hearing on Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at City Hall, 100 Newport Drive, Port Moody.

Background Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 2955 received Public Hearing on April22, 2014. A required component of the OCP is a regional context statement (RCS) which identifies the relationship between the OCP and Metro Vancouver's Regional Growth Strategy Metro 2040 (RGS) and outlines how the OCP is consistent or will be made consistent with the RGS over

#296988 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 148 Attachment 9.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Proposed Amendments to Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 February 2, 2015

time. One of the key components of this relationship is consistency between local and regional land use designations.

Section 866(1) of the Local Government Act requires that the OCP include an RCS that is accepted by the applicable regional district, in this case Metro Vancouver. On October 14, 2014 Council adopted OCP Bylaw 2955. In response, on November 13, 2014 Metro filed a petition to quash the new OCP bylaw on the basis that it did not meet legislative requirements to have the RCS accepted prior to final OCP adoption. At the request of the City, Metro agreed to extend the typical 21 day response period for the petition to March 31, 2015 to allow the City time to resolve the outstanding matters around the RCS.

At its meeting on January 27, 2015, Council discussed the current situation and a timeline and process proposed by staff to address Metro Vancouver's concerns. Following discussion, the following motion was passed:

THAT staff be directed to prepare amendments to Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 and the associated Regional Context Statement therein to address the inconsistencies identified by Metro Vancouver for Council's consideration as recommended in the report dated January 19, 2015 from Development Services - Planning Division regarding Official Community Plan - Next Steps.

Discussion Metro Vancouver staff have outlined the outstanding inconsistencies between the City's RCS and the RGS. The primary points of conflict and concern are the inconsistencies between the land use designations for the Andres Wines site and the Mill and Timber site in the City's new OCP and the Industrial designations for these sites in the RGS. Metro Vancouver staff have also requested that employment projections within the RCS be revisited. In addition to these items, there are a number of other minor mapping inconsistencies that are more housekeeping in nature. Amendments that respond to these concerns are included in proposed Amendment Bylaw No. 2955 included as Attachment 1 and summarized in the sections below:

Changing the Land Use Designation for the Mill and Timber Site to "General Industrial" • Amending OCP Map 1 - Overall Land Use to show the Mill and Timber site as "General Industrial"- the OCP Special Study Area overlay remains unchanged • Amending OCP Map 11 - Evergreen Line Sub-Areas by removing the colour overlay on the Mill and Timber site which had indicated a change in land use • Removing the Oceanfront District land use designation from Chapter 4: Overall Land Use Strategy • Amending RCS Map Schedule 1: Regional Land Use Designations (Appendix 1) to show the Mill and Timber site as "Industrial" -the RGS Special Study Area overlay remains unchanged

EDMS-#296988-v1-Report_to_ Council_re _ OCP _amendment_ to _address _Metro _s _ concerns_Feb _20 15 2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 149 Attachment 9.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Proposed Amendments to Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 February 2, 2015

Changing the Land Use Designation for the Andres Wines Site to "General Industrial" • Amending OCP Map 1 - Overall Land Use to show the Andres Wines site as "General Industrial" -the OCP Special Study Area overlay remains unchanged • Amending OCP Map 11 - Evergreen Line Sub-Areas by removing the colour overlay on the Andres Wines site which had indicated a change in land use and removing the 26 storey notation on the Andres Wines Special Study Area lands (includes 2100 block of Clarke Street) • Amending Section 15.5.1 Westport to reflect a height maximum of 6 storeys in this sub area (which is the height limit of the surrounding mixed use lands in the Westport sub area) • Amending Section 15.5.1 Westport to include a brief description of what the future vision for the Andres Special Study Area could include • Amending RCS Map Schedule 1: Regional Land Use Designations (Appendix 1) to show the Andres Wines site as "Industrial"

Updating Employment Statistics and Projections • Updates to Section 2.4.2 to reflect current 2011 Census data • Updates to Table 3: Occupations of Port Moody Residents to reflect current 2011 Census data • Updates to Table 4: Port Moody Residents' Section of Employment to reflect current 2011 Census data • Updates to RCS employment projections (Appendix 1) to reflect current 2011 Census data

Updating RCS Map Schedule 1: Regional Land Use Designations to Address Minor Inconsistencies- Attachment 2 • Non-consequential mapping edits to the CPR and road rights-of-way • Clarification that non-designated park areas remain as General Urban • Change to Firehall #1 site to General Urban (previously Conservation & Recreation)

Attachment 3 includes page excerpts from the OCP showing all of the proposed text changes in the context of the sections in which they appear in the Plan.

Other Options THAT Bylaw No. 3001 not be given First and Second Reading.

Financial Implications Proceeding with a Public Hearing process for Bylaw No. 3001 will involve the costs associated with advertising. These costs will be accommodated by the Development Services operating budget. Failure to address Metro Vancouver's outstanding concerns prior to the March 31 51 deadline may result in further legal action by Metro Vancouver with associated legal cost implications for the City.

EDMS-#296988-v1-Report_to_ Council_re _ OCP _amendment_ to _address _Metro _s_ concerns_Feb _20 15 3 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 150 Attachment 9.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Proposed Amendments to Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 February 2, 2015

Communications I Civic Engagement Should this proposed amendment proceed to Public Hearing as recommended by staff, it will be advertised in the local newspaper in accordance with the Development Approval Procedures Bylaw and the Local Government Act.

As well, property owners that will be directly affected by the proposed land use amendments to the OCP will be specifically notified and engaged in a consultation process as part of this process.

As outlined in Section 879 of the Local Government Act, Council is required to specifically consider whether consultation is required with: • The Greater Vancouver Regional District; • The Council of municipalities adjacent to the area covered by the plan (City of Burnaby, City of Coquitlam, Village of Anmore and Village of Belcarra); • First Nations including Musqueam Nation, Kwikwetlem First Nation, Sto:lo Nation, Sto:lo Tribal Council, Skawahlook First Nation, Soowahlie First Nation, Seabird Island Band, Shxw'owhamel First Nation, Lyackson First Nation, Penelakut Tribe, Hul'qumi'num Treaty Group, Stz'uminus First Nation, Cowichan Tribes, Halalt First Nation, Lake Cowichan First Nation, Squamish Nation, Tsleii-Waututh Nation and Katsie First Nation • School District 43; • Translink; • Port Metro· Vancouver; • BC Ministry of Environment; • Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

Typically this consultation involves referral of the OCP Amendment Bylaw to identified governments/agencies seeking comments within a 30 day consultation period. Staff are recommending that these agencies all be consulted for the typical period.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The OCP update process has been consistent with the goals of Planning for the Future and Engaging the Community highlighted within the 2012 Port Moody Council Strategic Plan.

An updated Official Community Plan will provide policies to guide the long term future of the City of Port Moody regarding land use.

Attachments: 1. Proposed Official Community Plan Amendment Bylaw No. 3001 2. Summary of proposed RCS map amendments 3. Summary of proposed text amendments and page excerpts from OCP showing the proposed amendments

EDMS-#296988-v1-Report_to_ Council_re_OCP _amendment_ to _address _Metro _s _concerns _Feb _2015 4 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 151 Attachment 9.3 Report/Recommendation to Council Proposed Amendments to Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 February 2, 2015

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

& ~ Depa ~ (initials): Manager of Planning James Stiver, MCIP, RPP

Reviewed for Form and Content I Approved for City Manager's Comment/Concurrence

City Manager

EDMS-#296988-v1-Report_to_ Council_re_ OCP_ amendment_to_address _Metro_ s _concerns _Feb _2015 5 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 152 Attachment 9.3 Attachment 1 City of Port Moody

Bylaw No. 3001

To amend the Official Community Plan to change the Official Community Plan and Regional Growth Strategy land use designations for the Andres Wines and Mill and Timber sites and include related housekeeping amendments.

The Council of the City of Port Moody enacts as follows:

1. Citation 1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No. 4, 2015, No. 3001

2. Amendment 2.1 The Official Community Plan Bylaw is amended by:

2.1.1 deleting the last two sentences of the second paragraph in Section 2.4.2 and replacing them with the following:

The 2011 Census results show that the total number of jobs in Port Moody was 7315. This figure represents an increase of 850 jobs or 13.1% during the period of 2006-2011. The resulting jobs to employed residents ratio of 0.21 remains largely unchanged from 2006 due to increases in both jobs and population during this period.

2.1.2 deleting Table 3: Occupations of Port Moody Residents, 2011 and replacing it with a new Table 3 included in Attachment 1.

2.1.3 deleting Table 4: Port Moody Residents' Sector of Employment, 2011 and replacing it with a new Table 4 included in Attachment 2.

2.1.4 deleting the words "with the exception of the property known as Andres Wines site" from the last sentence of Section 4.1.3.

2.1.5 deleting Section 4.1.6 Oceanfront District land use designation from Chapter 4: Overall Land Use Strategy and renumbering the sections that follow in sequential order.

2.1.6 deleting the first sentence from the third paragraph of Section 15.5.1 and replacing it with the following:

To achieve this, a number of properties adjacent to Barnet Hwy have been designated as Mixed Use - Moody Centre with building heights ranging up to 6 storeys.

#297272 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 153 Attachment 9.3

2.1. 7 adding the following sentence to the fourth paragraph of Section 15.5.1:

It is envisioned that in the future this area may transition into a comprehensive development with a mix of uses taking advantage of its proximity to rapid transit.

2.1.8 deleting policy #2 from Section 15.5.1 and renumbering the policies that follow in sequential order.

2.1.9 deleting Map 1: Overall Land Use Plan and replacing it with a new Map 1 in Attachment 3.

2.1.1 0 deleting Map 11: Evergreen Line Sub-Areas and replacing it with a new Map 11 included in Attachment 4.

2.1.11 deleting the total employment figures in Section 1.1.3 b) of Appendix 1: Regional Context Statement and replacing them with 8,373 for Year 2021, 8,873 for Year 2031 and 9,573 for Year 2041.

2.1.12 deleting the Regional Land Use Designations map from Appendix 1: Regional Context Statement and replacing it with a new Regional Land Use Designations map included in Attachment 5.

3. Attachments 3.1 The following attachments form part of this bylaw: 3.1.1 Attachment 1 -Table 3: Occupations of Port Moody Residents, 2011 3.1.2 Attachment 2- Table 4: Port Moody Residents' Sector of Employment, 2011 3.1.3 Attachment 3 - Map 1: Overall Land Use Plan 3.1.4 Attachment 4 - Map 11: Evergreen Line Sub-Areas 3.1.5 Attachment 5- Regional Land Use Designations

4. Severability 4.1 If a portion, of this bylaw is found invalid by a court, it will be severed and the remainder of the bylaw will remain in effect.

Read a first time this day of '2015

Read a second time this day of '2015

Read a third time this day of '2015

Adopted this day of '2015

City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No.4, 2015, No. 3001 2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 154 Attachment 9.3

M.E. Clay Dorothy Shermer Mayor Corporate Officer

I hereby certify that the above is a true copy of Bylaw No. 3001 of the City of Port Moody.

Dorothy Shermer Corporate Officer

City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw 2014, No. 2955, Amendment Bylaw No.4, 2015, No. 3001 3 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 155 Attachment 9.3

TABLE 3: OCCUPATIONS OF PORT MOODY RESIDENTS, 2011

INDUSTRY 2011 SHARE(%) Sales and service 3,535 18.7% Business, finance and administration 3,245 17.2% Management 3,085 16.4% Education, law and social, community and government services 2,635 14.0% Trades, transport and equipment operation 1,990 10.6% Natural and applied sciences V90 9.5% Health 1,200 6.4% Arts, culture, recreation and sport 920 4.9% Manuracturing and utilities 335 1.8% ~,.... Natural resources, agriculture and related production 95 0.5% I» 0 Total 18,~BO 100% ::J 3 C'D ,....::::s ,....,..\, 0 OJ '< I»- =E z .0 (.,.) 0 0 ,..\, RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 156 Attachment 9.3

TABLE 4: PORT MOODY RESIDENTS' SECTOR OF EMPLOYMENT, 2011

INDUSTRY 2011 SHARE(%) Wholesale and retail trade 2,835 15.1fb Professional, scientific & technical services 2,205 11.6% Health care and social assistance 1,840 9.8% Education 1,810 9.6% Finance, insurance & real estate 1,505 8.0% Public administration 1,305 6.9% Construction 1,295 6.9% Accommodation & food services 1,075 5.7% Information & cultural industries 1,015 5.4% Manufacturing 970 5.2% Other 880 4.7% Management & administrative services 780 4.1 o/o ~ Transportation & warehousing 655 3.5°/o ll) (") Arts, entertainment & recreation 340 1.8% :::T 3 Utilities 165 0.9% CD :::s Primary industries, including agriculture, forestry, mining and oil & gas 155 0.8% ..... Total 18,830 100% .....1\) 0 OJ "< ll)- =E z 0 (.,.,) 0 0 ~ RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 157 Attachment 9.3 0 N Stream I Creek N Culvert

N Ditch SASAMAT

N Other Water Features LAK E NOTE: The stream/creek, culverts, ditches, and other water features shown on this map shall be used only as a guideline.

~, [~-( BURRARD ~ D Parks and Open Space S» (") D Public and Institutional ::::r D Industrial Business 3 C'D D General Industrial :::::s t!i:::j~ Mixed Use- Marina D Neighbourhood Commercial -w Moody Centre Transit D Oriented Development ~ Special Study Area 0 D Mixed Employment I•: •: 1Section 286 Agreement Area OJ - •- Municipal Boundary '< S»- 375 750 ~ Om 1500 z ------SCALE. 1 :33,000 0 ,. ~ ~ . 1l1c City of Port i\I9ody makes no representation or w:trr:mty ~ .,( , expre~!'ed or implied with re~-pcct to the accuracy, completeness or appr:opri.1.teness of the information cont.'lined hereon. w City of the Arts 0 Produced by Engineering & Paries Plot Date: 30-Jan-2015 0 • ~ RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 158 Attachment 9.3

OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN

EVERGREEN LINE SUB AREAS LEGEND I»~ A Westport (") Multi-Family Residential 3 Proposed Number of Store ys N Stream I Creek B Spring Street Promenade ::::r 0 Mixe d Use - Inlet Centre Evergreen Line -Tunnel N Culve rt Heritage Commercial District Evergree n Line - Elevated Ditch 3 C 0 Mixed Use- Moody Ce ntre (1) D Murray Street Boulevard Evergreen Line- Ground Level Other Water Features Mixed Employment % ,.....:::::::1 E Oceanfront District ---- 400m Radius from Station (= 5 min Walk) D ~r~~~h -~~~~~~e~ t~t~~~l o p me n t ----- Municipal Bounda ry ~ Moody Centre Station Transit Oriented Development f Public an d Institutional ,..... ~ Existing Connections G Inlet Centre Station Transit Oriented Development 0 - Future Co nn ectio ns m Tioc: C.~yo(PO<'I Moody mabo• roo ....pr~H>n~toon or IL'llnllnty '< ~ t hr .ceurxy,eonopl rtC'1 lM• or •ppropN!rnru of the- infomu.tic.n ronbtult'd hrrrotL l'roduo;rdbyEn(;in«Tinc;&P~rb Da~Piottrd: J6./

AN M O R E

BURRARD

~S» (") ::::r 3 C'D D Conservation Recreation ,....:::::1 0 Rural ,....en ~ Regional Special Study Areas 0 • • • Urban Containment Boundary OJ --- Municipal Boundary '< S» Om 375 750 1500 :E ~~~ ------SCALE 1:33,000~ z ~~~()<(/; The Oty of Port Moody makes no representation or warranty 0 ~~· expressed or implied with respect to the accur~cy. completeness or . appropriateness of the informacion contained hereon. (,.) CinJ of tile Arts Produced by Engineering & P:u:ks Plot Date: 5-Feb-2015 Q Q ~ RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 160 Attachment 9.3

Summary of Changes to Regional Land Use Designations Map in OCP

location RGS Designation in Revised RGS Rationale Existing I Previous OCP Map Designation in Regional Updated OCP Map Designation in RGS 1. Mill and Timber Site General Urban Industrial To address conflicts with RGS Industrial 2. Andres Wines Site General Urban Industrial To address conflicts with RGS Industrial 3. CPR Right of Way General Urban Industrial To clarify intention for these lands to be Industrial designated Industrial 4. Chip Kerr Park Conservation & Recreation General Urban Area is not a designated park- General General Urban Urban designation includes park use 5. Western portion of Conservation & Recreation General Urban Area is not a designated park and includes General Urban

Rocky Point Park- lands used for commercial purposes - ' includes Boathouse General Urban designation includes park use Restaurant, Old Mill Boathouse, Station Museum, city-owned Esplanade properties 6. Heritage Mountain Park Conservation & Recreation General Urban Area is not a designated park- General General Urban Urban designation includes park use 7. New Firehall #1 Site Conservation & Recreation General Urban Area is now zoned P1 (Public Service) and has General Urban a Public and Institutional OCP land use designation -new change since last RGS map was drafted 8. Pioneer Park Conservation & Recreation General Urban Area is not a designated park- General General Urban Urban designation includes park use 9. Imperial Oil lands north Conservation & Recreation General Urban Area includes private land that is not General Urban and south of the designated as park Bedwell Bay Road 10. Lot A west of Electoral Conservation & Recreation Rural Lot is privately owned and is not designated Conservation & )> Area A as park Recreation ...... w (") :r 3

®Page 11 -Table deleted and replaced with new table TABLE 3: OCCUPATIONS OF PORT MOODY RESIDENTS, 2011 OCCUPATION #OF EMPLOYED %OF TOTAL EMPLOYED RESIDENTS RESIDENTS Management, business, finance, and administration occupations 6,300 33.5%

Natural and applied sci ences and. related occupations 1,790 9.5% Health occupations 1,200 6.4% Occupations in education, law and social, community and government services 2,635 14% Occupations in art, cult ure, recreation an d sport 920 4.9% Sales and service occupations 3,5 25 18. 8% Trades, transport and equipment operators and related occ upations 1,990 10.6% Natural resources, agriculture and related production occupations 95 0.5% Occupations in manufacturing and utilities 33 5 1.8%

Total 18,790 100%

@Page 12 -Table deleted and replaced with new table TABLE 4: PORT MOODY RESIDENTS' SECTOR OF EMPLOYMENl2011 INDUSTRY SECTOR #OF EMPLOYED %OF TOTAL EMPLOYED RESIDENTS RESIDENTS Agricult ure, forestry, fis hing, mining, oil and gas extraction 155 0.8%

Transportation, warehousing, utilities, and waste management 1,575 8.4% Construction 1,290 6.9% Manufacturing 970 5.2% Wholesale and retail trade 2,830 15.1% Arts, entertainment, recreation, information and cultural services 1,350 7.2% Finance insurance, real estate and business services 3,725 19.8% Government, educations, health and social services 4,945 26.3% Accommodation and food services 1,075 5.7% Other services 875 4.6%

Tota l 18,790 100% RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 162 Attachment 9.3

@ Page 16 - Part of last sentence in @ Page 85 - Highlighted area deleted paragraph deleted and replaced with revised 4.1.3 MIXED USE- MOODY CENTRE wording To achieve this, a number of properties adjacent to Barnet Hwy The Mixed Use- Moody Centre designation applies to an have been designated as Mixed Use - Moody Centre with area intended for the development of a variety of retail, service, building heights ranging from 6 to26 storeys. The remainder office and stand-alone commercial activities. Multi-family ofthe proposed land use changes encourage multi-family residential uses will also be permitted in association with residential forms including ground-oriented and apartment commercial uses. A range of building heights are permitted forms. As an entrance into Port Moody from the west, this up to a maximum of 6 storeys with the exception of the area provides a unique opportunity for the incorporation of a property known as the Andres Wines site. welcome or identity feature potentially through the use of a prominent piece of public art. This area borders the Moody Centre Heritage Conservation Area (HCA) to the east. Page 17 - Section deleted Development in this area is expected to be distinct from yet @ compatible with the objectives of the HCA. 4.1.6 OCEANFRONT DISTRICT The Oceanfront District designation applies to the development (j) Page 85 - Addition of highlighted of a mix of residential, commercial, marina, light industrial, institutiona l and public open space uses on the existing Mill sentence and Timber sawm ill site. The property commonly known as the Andres Wines site is designated as a Special Study Area in the OCP. The Special Study Area designation applies to lands where more detailed planning is required by way of an area plan or a site specific development plan. It is envisioned that in the future this are may transition into a comprehensive development with a mix of uses taking advantage of its pwximity to rapid transit.

@ Page 85 - Policy deleted 2. For f\llixed Use designated properties on the north side of 2100 block of Clarke Street and the property commonly known as the Andres Wine site, a maximum height of 26 storeys will be considered.

@ Page 116- Highlighted numbers in Total Employment deleted and replaced with revised figures Population, Dwelling Unit and Employment Projections (Estimates) for Port Moody (2021 -2041) Year 2021 Year 2031 Year 2041 Population 39,660 44,820 . 50,000 Dwelling Units 18,027 20,372 22,727 Total Employment 6,840 7,370 7,900 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 163 Attachment 9.3

On a local level, the preference among seniors to age in place will influence the provision of adaptable housing, support 2.4.2 PORT MOODY'S RESIDENT LABOUR FORCE services and neighbourhood design that provides for a mix of AND LOCAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES housing, transportation options and uses in close proximity. Safety and accessibility will also continue to be of importance Finance and business services as well as educationa.l, health and as will recreation and community programs to suit the demands social services dominate employment among the labour force of a growing senior population. both loca lly and regionally. This trend is expected to continue. A large proportion of local residents are also employed in the 2.3 ECONOMIC TRENDS service sector which is expected to be the source of most new employment in the future.

2.3.1 ENERGY CONSERVATION One of the goals of this Official Community Plan is the G) development of a complete community within Port Moody. In an effort to reduce the amount of energy consumed in Among other objectives, a complete community involves public buildings, the City of Port Moody has adopted a Energy achieving a balance between the number of employment and Green House Gas Management Corporate Action Plan opportunities and the number of employed residents within to retrofit existing facilities to achieve better energy efficiency. a municipality. In general terms, the ultimate goal is to achieve New facilities such as the Public Safety Building have a 1:1 ratio of jobs to employed residents. The 2011 Census incorporated alternative energy sources such as geothermal results show that the total number of jobs in Port Moody energy. On a community wide level, the City is embarking was 7315. This figure represents an increase of 850 jobs or on a Community Energy and Emissions Plan to track current 13 .1 o/o during the period of 2006-2011. The resulting jobs to energy consumption levels and set targets for energy reduction employed residents ratio of 0.21 rema ins largely unchanged in new and existing buildings. from 2006 due to increases in both jobs and population during this period. 2.4 SOCIAL TRENDS To help increase the number of employment opportunities in Port Moody, the City continues to promote developments that 2.4.1 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY generate loca l jobs and integrate residential areas with retail and other forms of commercial space. In order to encourage Housing affordability continues to be one of the key challenges residents to seek employment within their own community, facing municipalities in Metro Vancouver as housing prices climb economic development strategies also need to promote jobs throughout the region. In 2013, the Metro Vancouver average that are reflective of the resident labour force. To minimize the house price was 9.5 times the median household income. This loss of existing employment opportunities, land use policies is significantly above the national average of 4.7 making Metro need to ensure that redevelopment of existing industrial areas Vancouver housing the least affordable in Canada. Low vacancy continues to integrate intensive employment generating uses. rates (l ess than 3%) have also made it increasingly difficult to find rental accommodation. This trend is expected to continue as new rental supply remains very limited.

The incidence of homelessness continues to be a concern, not only on a broader regional basis, but also increasingly more locally within the Tri-Cities. Efforts to address homelessness and affordable housing at a local leve l is the focus of the Tri-Cities Homelessness and Housing Task Group.

The Metro Vancouver Affordable Housing Strategy adopted in November 2007 outlines a number of actions which could be adopted at both regional and municipal levels to expand housing choice and affordability in the region. To address the affordability challenge, several municipalities in the region, including Port Moody, have been working on innovative approaches to address this issue including affordable housing reserve funds and support for affordable housing types such as secondary suites, laneway housing and live/work housing types. To adequately address this issue, however, support from both provincial and federal governments is critical.

10 Chapter 2- Key Trends and Issues City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 164 Attachment 9.3 TABLE 2: POPULATION GROWTH ESTIMATES, 2011 - 2041

YEAR POPULATION ESTIMATE 2011 34,509 2021 39,660 2031 44,820 2041 50,000

TABLE 3: OCCUPATION SOF PORT MOODY RESID ENTS, 2011

INDUSTRY Sa les and service Business, finance and administration Management Education, law and socia l, community and government services Trades, transport and equipment operation Natura l and applied sciences Hea lth Arts, cu lture, recreation and sport Manuracturing and utilities Natural resources, agriculture and re lated production Total

Chapter 2- Key Trends and Issues City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 77 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 165 Attachment 9.3 ® TABLE 4: PORT MOODY RESIDENTS'S ECTOR OF EMPLOYMENT, 2011

INDUSTRY 2011 SHARE (%) Wholesale and retail trade 2,835 15.1 % Professional, scientific & technica l services 2,205 11.6% Health care and socia l assistance 1,840 9.8% Education 1,810 9.6% Finance, insurance & real estate 1,505 8.0% Publi c administration 1,305 6.9% Construction 1,295 6.9% Accommodation & food services 1,075 5.7% Information & cu ltural industries 1,015 5.4% Manufacturing 970 5.2% Other 880 4.7% Management & administrative services 780 4.1% Transportation & warehousing 655 3.5% Arts, entertainment & recreation 340 1.8% Utilities 165 0.9% Primary industries, including agriculture, forestry, mining and oil & gas 155 0.8% Total 18,830 100%

Tab les 3 and 4 show that the majority of employed Port Moody Port M()ody's transportation system is complex and operates residents have j obs in the sa les and service area; government, within the larger context of events on a subregional, regional health and education fields; and the finance and business service and provincial level. Population growth within the northeast sectors. In order to faci litate a better match between jobs and the sector and the Fraser Valley has led to increasing volumes of skills of employed residents, land use policies and development traffic for residents and commuters and pressure for improved bylaws need to support employment opportunities in these sectors. transit and roadways. Given its location in the region, Port Moody has long experienced the impacts of traditional and historical commuting patterns as traffic passes through its 2.5 TR AN SP ORTATION OPTIONS borders en route to points east and west.

The Evergreen Rapid Transit Line is expected to be completed in 2016 connecting Coquitlam and Port Moody to the existing M illennium Li ne. Studies are also underway to determine how the Murray-Clarke Corridor should evolve to serve the future transportation needs oft he community and region. Both of these projects will help support the high density residential and commercial development in Inlet Centre and stimulate redevelopment in other parts of the City, particularly Moody Centre.

There is also a need to continue to promote alternative forms of transportation including walking and cycling through land use policies that support an integrated bicycle and pedestrian trail system and the development of complete, compact communities that reduce reliance on private automobiles. Transportation is intricately tied to land use and the economy. It is necessary for the efficient movement of goods and people and strongly influences land use decisions on both a regional and local level.

12 Chapter 2- Key Trends and Issues City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 166 Attachment 9.3

The OCP Overall Land Use Plan map (Map 1) depicts existing Laneway housing refers to a detached dwelling unit that and future land uses for the purpose of guiding future land use is secondary to the primary residence of the property owner decisions. The land use designations set out in this Chapter and includes a detached rear garage apartment or cottage and depicted on Map 1 are the approximate locations, amount, style structures. type or density for various kinds of development and faci lities as required under section 877 of the Local Government Act. This means that the specific land uses and their boundaries 4.1.2 MULTI-FAMILY RESID ENTIAL should be read as a general guide, as they may not represent The Multi-Family Residentia l designation is intended to precisely what would be allowed on any particular property. support the development of low to medium density attached housing. Building forms will range from ground oriented Map 1 Overall Land Use Plan is intended as a general land use duplexe s, townhouses or stacked townhouses to apartment concept plan. An OCP does not commit or authorize the structures and will generally range from 3 to 6 storeys in City to proceed with any project that is specified in the OCP. height depending upon area specific policies. However, after an OCP has been adopted, all bylaws enacted or works undertaken by Council must be consistent with the OCP. 4.1.3 MIXEDUS E- MOODY CENTR E A Public Hearing is required to adopt or change a land use designation. The Mixed Use - Moody Centre designation applies to an area intended for the development of a variety of retail, service, office and stand-alone commercial activities. Multi-family 4.1 LAN DU SE DES IGNATION S residentia l uses will also be permitted in association with commercial uses. A range of building heights are permitted Land use designations are the broad categories of permitted up to a maximum of 6 storeys. land uses. The following provides a brief description of each @) land use designation 4.1.4 MOODY CENTRE STATION TRANSIT-OR IE NTE D

4.1.1SINGLE FAMILY FORM The Moody Centre Station Transit-Oriented Development designation applies to the development of mixed use, The Single Family/Low Density form designation is intended pedestrian friendly development within a 400 metre radius of to accommodate the development of sing le family homes with Moody Central Station. Bui lding forms are diverse ranging from the option for a secondary suite. i . low and mid rise forms and include a mix of uses including residential, retail, office, service, civic, institutional, recreational This form of housing generally consists of one house, or one house and cultural uses. with a secondary suite, on a single lot. Laneway housing will be considered when associated with heritage conservation or to allow A diversity of building heights not to exceed 12 storeys is for a modest amount of in fill that preserves the scale and character encouraged as part of a comprehensive plan. of existing single family areas._Density will not exceed that permitted in the zoning regu lations for single family low density forms except in cases where secondary suites and/or laneway housing are permitted in an effort to conserve heritage bu ildings.

16 Chapter 4- Overall Land UseStrategy City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 167 Attachment 9.3 4.1.5 MIXED EMPLOYMENT

The Mixed Employment designation applies to the development of a combination of uses including light industrial, commercial, office and residential. A maximum of 6 storey buildin g forms within this designation will be considered, the first storey of which must be employment related non-residential uses. 4.1.6 MIXED USE -INLET CENTRE @

The Mixed Use - Inlet Centre designation applies to the development of low, mid and high rise forms of pedestrian oriented higher density mixed use development within the Inlet Centre neighbourhood. Within these areas, a mix of uses will be permitted including residential, retail, office, service, civic, institutional, recreational, and cultural. Building heights 4.1.11 PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL for mid rise building forms will not exceed 12 storeys. Building heights for high rise building forms will not exceed 26 storeys. The Public and In stitutional designation is intended for a range of sites that provide public amenities and facilities for Port 4.1.7 MIXED USE- MARINA Moody residents (e.g. schools, hospitals, places of worship).

The Mixed Use- Marina designation applies to areas intended 4.1.12 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL for the development of a variety of retail, service, office and stand-alone commercial activities including marina related uses. The General Industrial designation provides for the development Multi-family residential uses will also be permitted in association of heavier industrial uses such as manufacturing and port related uses. with commercial uses with heights not to exce ed four storeys. 4.1.13 SECTION 286 AGREEMENT AREA 4.1.8 NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMERCIAL The Section 286 Agreement Area designation applies to areas The Neighbourhood Commercial designation applies to that are subject to an agreement between the City, Park Lane isolated properties within the Seaview, Heritage Mountain and Homes Ltd. and the Province under what was section 286 oft he Pleasantside neighbourhoods that are intended to provide Municipal Act. This area is located within the Heritage Woods local retail opportunities in keeping with the scale and character neighbourhood area. of the surrounding neighbourhood. Stand-alone commercial or mixed use commercial/residential uses are permitted within 4.1.14 SAND AND GRAVEL EXTRACTION this designation. Based on available soils information and in light of existing and 4.1.9 SPECIAL STUDY AREA future settlement patterns, it has been determined that there are no significant sand and gravel deposits suitable for The Special Study Area designation applies to lands where extraction within the City of Port Moody. more detailed planning is required by way of an area plan or a site specific development plan. 4.1.15 AGRICULTURAL USES

4.1.10 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE There are no present or proposed agricultural lands within the City of Port Moody. The Parks and Open Space designation encompasses lands intended for public open space providing recreational opportunities for Port Moody residents. It a I so provides protection for environmentally sensitive lands.

Chap ter 4-Overall Land Use Strategy City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 17 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 168 Attachment 9.3 15.5 EVERGREEN LINE SUB-AREAS RGR££N ., 0 >- ~~· Map 11 shows all of the Evergreen Line Sub-Areas and includes <( • g;,!'j . more detailed information related to OCP land use designations ~--"' ,;G~ (!) ~.Ye. . and permitted building heights for these areas. :c · ~4. ~i~ ~1:: .

15.5.1 WESTPORT g. COLUMBIA VINTNER STREET

- ~ CLARKE z CLARKE STREET As part of new development in this area, a number of desirable c ~ · -o w ~ components have been identified including: SPRING 0 ~ a_ l Ui ST. JOHNS STREET • artist live/work space I ·public arts presentation space ~ ~ ST. t (!) ·seniors accommodation ::> lh 0 • assisted living accommodation ~ 0 D-?;~ ~ It:w ·high tech mixed employment space HOPE ·enhanced green space ~ ~ ·new parks Policy directions in this section apply to the area outlined in the map above. ·commercial/retail service space 2. For multi-family residential designated properties south of ·a pedestrian trail connecting Seaview, Glenayre, Clarke Stand north of St Johns St in the 2100 block, building and College Park to the area. heights up to a maximum height of 3 storeys will be considered.

The western end of Moody Centre adjacent to Barnet Highway 3. For the Mixed Use designated property at 2036 St Johns St, a is envisioned as the western gateway to Port Moody. Future maximum height of 6 storeys will be considered. development in this area will strive to balance the local res idential character and functions with new opportunities 4. For the Mixed Use designated properties in the 2000 blocks of for loca lly serving commercial uses, as well as more diverse St. George Street and the south side of St Johns Street (former housing options. Barnet Hotel site and adjacent properties), a maximum building height of 6 storeys will be considered. Commercial To achieve this, a number of properties adjacent to Barnet Hw~ uses will be limited to the St. Johns Stand Albert St frontages. have been designated as Mixed Use- Moody Centre with ~ A comprehensive development plan will be required for building heights ranging up to 6 storeys. The remainder of the these blocks taking into consideration the change in grade, proposed land use changes encourage multi-family residential access, potential traffic impacts and compatibility with forms including ground-oriented and apartment forms. As an adjacent single family uses. entrance into Port Moody from the west, this area provides a unique opportunity for the incorporation of a welcome or identity S.ldentified heritage buildings in the Westport area should be feature potentially through the use of a prominent piece conserved and retained as part of any redevelopment project. of public art. This area borders the Moody Centre Heritage Conservation Area (HCA) to the east. Development in this 6. Above 2 storeys, upper floors will be set back from St. Johns area is expected to be distinct from yet compatible with the and Clarke Streets. Above 4 storeys, upper floors will be set objectives of the HCA. back from Barnet Highway.

The property commonly known as the Andres Wines site is 7. For the multi-family designated properties in the cul-de-sac on designated as a Special Study Area in the OCP. The Special Charles St, a maximum height of 6 storeys will be considered in Study Area designati9n applies to lands where more detailed order to create open space for intact forests, creeks and trails. planning is required by way of an area plan or a site specific development plan. It is envisioned that in the future this area(:;\ 8. Prior to any significant red evelopment in the Charles Str~et may transition into a comprehensive development with a 0 neighbourhood, the City will develop a comprehensive plan mix of uses taking advantage of its proximity to rapid transit. for this area .

In this area: 9. Multi-family designated properties in the 2100 block of the south side of St. Johns Street will be considered for 1. The existing land use and character of the Glenayre, College redevelopment up to a maximum height of 6 storeys. Park, S~aview and Harbour Heights neighbourhoods shall generally be retained. ®

Chapter 75 - Neighbourhood Plan Areas City of Port Moody Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 85 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 169 Attachment 9.3

REGIONAL CONTEXT STATEMENT (RCS)

1.PURPOSE

As required under Sections 866 and 850(3) of the Local Government Act, the purpose of a Regional Context Statement is to identify, specifica lly, the relationship between the OCP and the Metro Vancouver regional growth strategy with respect to the future of the region, including social, economic and environmental objectives, population and employment projections and with respect to any actions proposed to provide for the needs of the projected population in relation to housing, transportation, regional district services, parks and natural areas, economic development, any targets, and actions to achieve such targets, for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the region and any other regional matter.

2. RCS CONTENTS

The OCP Regional Context Statement is as follows:

2040 METRO VANCOUVER REGIONAL GROWTH STRATEGY (RGS) GOALS

2040 Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy Th e Regional Context Statement (RCS) Policy (RGS) Goals (e.g. provides examples of how the OCP is or can be made consistent with the 2040 RGS) RGS GOAL 1- CREATE ACOMPACT URBAN AREA STRATEGY 1.1 CONTAIN URBAN DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE URBAN CONTAINMENT BOUNDARY Role of Municipalities 1.1.3 Adopt Regional Context Statements which: a) Depict the Urban Containment Boundary on a map, The Urban Containment Boundary is shown on "Schedule 1 - Regional generally consistent with the Regional Land Use Land Use Designations': Designations map (Map2); b) Provide municipal population, dwelling unit and Population, Dwelling Unit and Employment Projections (Estimates) for employment projections, with reference to Port Moody (2021 - 2041) guidelines contained Appendix Table A.1 (RGS), Year 2021 Year 2031 Year 2041 and demonstrate how municipal plans will work Population 39,660 44,820 50,000 towards accommodating the projected growth within the Urban Containment Boundary. Dwelling Units 18,027 20,372 22,727 Total Employment 8,373 8,873 9,573 ®

11 6 Appendix 1- Regional Context Statement City of Port Moody Offjcial Community Plan Bylaw No. 2955 170

This Page Intentionally Left Blank Council Agenda Information [X] Regular Council February 10, 2015 171 Attachment 9.4

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendation to Council

File No. 01-0530-01/2015

Submitted by: Councillor Diana Dilworth

Subject: Transparency in Reporting of Council Expenses

Purpose / Introduction To provide Council with background information related to a notice of motion put forward by Councillor Dilworth regarding increased transparency in reporting of council expenses.

Recommended Resolutions

WHEREAS transparency of where and how tax dollars are spent is a priority defined within the City's Long Term Strategic Financial Plan;

AND WHEREAS the formal Schedule of Council Remuneration and Expenses must be forwarded to the Province of British Columbia by June 30th of each year and made available to the public before that date;

AND WHEREAS all levels of government are moving to a higher level of transparency related to elected officials expenditures;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the annual Schedule of Council Remuneration and expenses be posted to the City's website on an annual basis;

AND THAT detailed travel and expense claims be posted to the City's website on a quarterly basis.

Background At the January 27, 2015 Regular Council Meeting, Councillor Dilworth introduced a Notice of Motion in regards to enhanced transparency and accountability of Council's expense claim reporting. The motion, as presented, is identified above.

Discussion In May 2014, the City of Port Moody posted members of Council's expense claims, as submitted, for the first time. Staff was asked if this was a practice that would be repeated on an annual basis and it was noted that specific Council direction was required in this regard.

EDMS-#297620-v1-RTC_-_TransparencyJn_Reporting_of_Council_Expenses_-_2015_02_03 1 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 172 Attachment 9.4 Report/Recommendation to Council Transparency in Reporting of Council Expenses February 3, 2015

All levels of government appear to be moving to a higher level of transparency related to the travel and expense expenditures incurred by elected officials.

Since 2014, the Government of Canada requires the federal Members of Parliament (MP) to report on a quarterly basis, detailing expenditures related to their office budgets, travel expenses, hospitality and gifts, amongst other categories. This reporting is governed by the federal Members' Allowances and Sen/ices Manual. www.parl.qc.ca/smartweb/mas/Document.aspx?Lanquaqe=E&sbdid=1bba0e0d-2c68-4838-8ff1- 7ee63f452a0c

Since 2013, the Government of British Columbia requires the provincial Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) to report on a quarterly basis, detailing expenditures related to their office budgets, travel expenses, hospitality and gifts, amongst other categories. This information is also reported in the Government's annual Public Accounts of SC. www.fin.gov.bc.ca/ocq/pa/13 14/CRF%20Detailed%20Scheds%20of%20Pavments%2013- 14.pdf#page=9&view=Fit

Subsequently, many local government agencies are following this trend and making efforts to an enhanced and increased level of transparency in reporting. While local governments are required to submit Council remuneration and expense to the Province of BC on an annual basis and make the information public, this has often meant printing the information out and having it available if members of the public ask for it.

Given the advancements of technology, and the public's expectation of having timely and convenient access to public information, the City of Port Moody has an opportunity to commit, proactively, to a higher level of transparency in regards to the expenditures incurred and claimed by its elected officials.

Other Options THAT the report from Councillor Diana Dilworth dated February 3, 2015 regarding Transparency in Reporting of Council Expenses be received for information.

Financial Implications Staff time will be required to translate the submitted travel and expense claims submitted by members of Council to a format suitable for posting to the City's website. No additional financial implications are anticipated.

Communications / Civic Engagement A move to provide additional information to residents on the expenditure of tax dollars via the City's website would be indicative of a commitment by Council to a higher level of accountability, and a move to further engage the community on financial matters.

297620 2 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 173 Attachment 9.4 Report/Recommendation to Council Transparency in Reporting of Council Expenses February 3, 2015

Council Strategic Plan Objectives The Excellence in Service Delivery goal, as identified within the 2012 Port Moody City Council Strategic Plan, includes a goal related to the city being cognizant of and accountable for fiscal responsibility in providing services to our community.

The City's recently public Long Term Strategic Financial Framework (LTSFF) document references the local government's commitment to the principle of transparency.

297620 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 174 Attachment 9.4 Report/Recommendation to Council Transparency in Reporting of Council Expenses February 3, 2015

Prepared by:

Diana Dilworth Councillor

Reviewed for Form and Content / Approved for Submission to Council: City Manager's Comment/Concurrence

City Manager

For Committee of the Whole Reports. To be completed by Legislative Services. Refer to Regular ÿ Refer to Regular O Direct staff to ÿ Receive for Council as recommended. Council with amendments prepare new report for information. as discussed. Committee of the Whole.

297620 4 Council Agenda Information COWM Regular Council February 10, 2015 175 Attachment 9.5

City of Port Moody Report/Recommendation to Council

Date: February 2,2015 File No. 0630-01

Submitted by: Councillor Rick Glumac

Subject: Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment

Purpose / Introduction To seek Council endorsement of the Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment.

Recommended Resolutions

THAT the Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment be endorsed as recommended in the report dated February 2, 2015 from Councillor Rick Glumac regarding Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment;

Background Over 100 nations recognize the constitutional right to a healthy environment. Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms does not currently recognize this right but momentum is building across the country at the municipal level. Already Richmond, Victoria, and Vancouver have passed the declaration as well as cities as far away as Yellowknife and Montreal. The David Suzuki foundation is also working with over 40 other municipalities as part of their Blue Dot campaign. As stated on the bluedot.ca website: "Community by community, this movement will inspire decision-makers across our provinces and territories to take notice. With so many communities calling for action from all levels of government, the next step is to have our provinces follow suit and pass environmental bills of rights. Cities come together to change a province. Provinces come together to change a nation. When seven out of 10 provinces representing more than 50 per cent of the Canadian population have recognized our right to a healthy environment we turn toward the ultimate goal: amending the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms."

Discussion According to a recent poll by McAllister Opinion Research, 9 out of 10 Canadians are concerned about the impact of environmental degradation on their health and the health of their children. Preventable environmental hazards are estimated to contribute up to 1.5 million hospital days in Canada annually due to cardiovascular disease, respiratory illness, cancer, and birth defects

EDMS-#296560-v1-RTC_-_Declaration_of_the_Right_ot_a_Healthy_Environment 1 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 176 Attachment 9.5 Report/Recommendation to Council Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment February 2, 2015

alone. Although environmental laws have been weakening in recent years at the federal level, Municipal governments still have several mechanisms through bylaws and policies to protect their residents from environmental harm and to promote a healthy and sustainable community.

Indeed Port Moody has been a leader in many environmental and health related areas including: banning cosmetic pesticides, banning shark fin soup, declaring the banning of tanning beds for children under 18 (superseded by a provincial ban), leading the province in recycling diversion, and protecting significant forested and natural areas as parks. This declaration is in many ways a formalization of the good work that the city has already been doing and will help promote environmental leadership to many municipalities across the country.

Attachment 1 lists answers to a number of questions related to this campaign. Attachment 2 is the proposed Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment.

Other Options THAT the report dated February 2, 2015 from Councillor Rick Glumac regarding Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment be received for information.

Financial Implications There are no anticipated costs above normal City operations.

Communications / Civic Engagement Objectives and timelines, as outlined in the declaration, can be determined in coordination with the city's Environmental Protection Committee. Once determined these objectives could be shared publicly on the city's website for feedback.

Council Strategic Plan Objectives This declaration relates to the Planning for the Future goal of the 2012 Council Strategic Plan.

- Attachments: 1. Municipal Declaration of Environmental Rights - Frequently Asked Questions. 2. Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment.

EDMS-#296560-v1-RTC_-_Declaration_of_the_Right_ot_a_Healthy_Environment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 177 Attachment 9.5 Report/Recommendation to Council Declaration of the Right to a Healthy Environment February 2, 2015

Prepared by:

Councillor Rick Glumac

Reviewed for Form and Content / Approved for Submit to Council City Manager's Comment/Concurrence Ine D.fpow ^7/0

For Committee of the Whole Reports. To be completed by Legislative Services. Refer to Regular Q Refer to Regular ÿ Direct staff to ÿ Receive for Council as recommended. Council with amendments prepare new report for information. as discussed. Committee of the Whole.

EDMS-#296560-v1-RTC_-_Declaration_of_the_Right_ot_a_Healthy_Environment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 178 Attachment 9.5 the ••i irf'V -r ¦¦ bluenot ' ^ U US t \ L (-:L L> MOVEMENT . Attachment 1

Municipal Declaration of Environmental Rights — faqs

What are environmental rights? Just as Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees us freedom of expression and protects us from discrimination, environmental rights would ensure that our laws and policies protect the basic elements of our survival, such as clean air, safe water and unpolluted land. Over the past 50 years, the right to a healthy environment has gained recognition faster than any other human right. Today, Canada is among a minority of countries that does not yet to recognize the right to a healthy environment.

Is the environment a municipal issue? Municipal governments make decisions that affect transportation, housing density, waste disposal and other issues related to the quality of the environment. Local governments also have the power to pass bylaws to protect residents from environmental harm. For example, in 1991, the Municipality of Hudson, Quebec, passed a bylaw to restrict the use of pesticides. Since then, communities across Canada have considered passing pesticide restrictions to protect the health of residents.

What is a municipal declaration of environmental rights? Even though our national Constitution does not formally recognize environment rights, local governments can introduce declarations of environmental rights to show their support for residents' rights to clean air, water and safe food. Declarations are also a commitment by municipalities to address local environmental concerns. Municipal declarations also have the power to draw attention to the Canadian Constitution's silence on environmental issues.

What would a declaration of environmental rights mean in my community? A municipal declaration of environmental rights is a commitment to decision-making principles that will protect, fulfill and promote the right to a healthy environment. A community's specific declaration might include a commitment to use the best and latest available science to ensure that the right to a healthy environment is always considered when decisions are made. A declaration can also include a commitment to set clear environmental objectives and targets for air pollution or other issues of relevance to the community. Finally, a declaration of environmental rights can ensure accountability through regular assessment and public reporting of the municipality's progress on meeting its sustainability objectives.

Will municipal declarations support environmental rights for all Canadians? Large-scale social change starts in our own backyards. As a growing movement of Canadians calls upon local communities to pass municipal declarations respecting people's right to live in a healthy environment, decision-makers across all provinces and territories will take notice. This will put pressure on provinces to follow suit and pass environmental bills of rights, as some provinces, including Ontario and Quebec, have already done. While these bills do not have the same force as a Charter right, they send a strong signal that Canadians are ready for change. When seven out of 10 provinces representing more than 50 per cent of the Canadian population have recognized our right to a healthy environment we turn toward the ultimate goal: adding environmental rights to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

How can I support a declaration in my community? Canadians from coast to coast to coast are already leading grassroots campaigns to urge their local communities to make declarations of support for environmental rights. To find out how you can get involved in your community, visit www.bluedot.ca. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 179 Attachment 9.5

Attachment 2 Declaration of Right to a Healthy Environment

WHEREAS the City of Port Moody understands that people are part of the environment, and that a healthy environment is inextricably linked to the well-being of our community;

BE IT RESOLVED THAT The City of Port Moody find and declare that:

1. All people have the right to live in a healthy environment, including: ® The right to breathe clean air; ® The right to drink clean water; ® The right to consume safe food; ® The right to access nature; • The right to know about pollutants and contaminants released into the local environment; and, • The right to participate in decision-making that will affect the environment.

2. The City of Port Moody has the responsibility, within its jurisdiction, to respect, protect, fulfill and promote these rights.

3. The City of Port Moody shall apply the precautionary principle: where threats of serious or irreversible damage to human health or the environment exist, the City of Port Moody shall take cost effective measures to prevent the degradation of the environment and protect the health of its citizens. Lack of full scientific certainty shall not be viewed as sufficient reason for the City of Port Moody to postpone such measures.

4. The City of Port Moody shall apply full cost accounting: when evaluating reasonably foreseeable costs of proposed actions and alternatives, the City of Port Moody will consider costs to human health and the environment.

5. By December 31, 2015, the City of Port Moody shall specify objectives, targets and timelines and actions the City of Port Moody will take, within its jurisdiction, to fulfill residents' right to a healthy environment, including priority actions to: a. Ensure infrastructure and development projects protect the environment, including air quality; b. Address climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and implementing adaptation measures; c. Prioritize walking, cycling and public transit as preferred modes of transportation; d. Ensure adequate infrastructure for the provision of safe and accessible drinking water; e. Reduce solid waste and promote recycling and composting; f. Establish and maintain accessible green spaces in all residential neighbourhoods.

The City of Port Moody shall review the objectives, targets, timelines and actions every five (5) years, and evaluate progress towards fulfilling this declaration. The City of Port Moody shall consult with residents through committees and public input as part of this process. 180

This Page Intentionally Left Blank RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 181 Attachment 10.1 377, rue Bank Street, cupw sttp Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1Y3 tel./tel 613 236 7238 fax/h~ lec 613 563 7861

January 15, 2015 Mr. Mike Clay Mayor City of Port Moody PO Box 36 100 Newpoti Dr Port Moody, BC V3H 3E1 Dear Mr. Clay, Re: Request for Support to Save Canada Post Over a year ago, Canada Post Corporation announced a plan to change public postal service as we know it, and the government endorsed tllis plan. As a result, the corporation has dramatically hiked postage rates and is planning on eliminating door·to-door delivery, closing and downsizing post offices, reducing post office hours, and destroyjng thousands of decent jobs in communities throughout our counhy These major changes will be bad tor seniors, people with mobility issues, charities, small businesses and many other people who rely on public postal service. The Canadian Union of Postal Workers wants the fed eral government to reverse the Canada Post plan, and to look instead for ways to increase service and revenues in areas like postal bankjng, as other postal administrations have done. At the very least, we think the government should properl y consult with the public about what kind of postal service they need before allowing Canada Post to make such major changes. CUPW has attached a fact sheet with more information about Canada Post's plan. The union has also attached a resoJution that it would like your municipality to consider passing. To date, over 400 municipalities and municipal organizations have passed resolutions opposing Canada Post plan for cuts, or calling for a halt to door-to-door delivery cuts until there is proper consultation. CUPW hopes you will think about joining and building on these efforts by passing our or your own resolution. Thank you very much for considering this request. Thanks as well if your municipality passed an earlier resolution in support of postal banking or improving the Canadian Postal Service Charter. If you would like an electronic version of the resolution, please contact Brigitte !Gassen at [email protected]. Please call me at 613-236-7238 if you have any questions or concerns.

Denis Lemelin National President Encl . c.c. National Executive Committee, Regional Executive Committees, National Union Representatives, Regional Union Representatives, Specialists

/bk cop~ 225

Canadian Union of Rlstal Workers 71tetW'llggle continues CLC/CTC • FTO Up.jl ------~~------Syndicat des travailleurs et travaillauses des posies lA 1u1te continue tiiiKiiiZI: .IAN l 9 ?015 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10377. ru e Bank Str182eet, Attachment 10.1 CU(?W sttp Ottawa, Ontario 1<2P 1Y3 tel./tel. 613 236 7238 fax/tehk . 613 563 7861

SAVE CANADA POST· STOP THE CUTS

WHEREAS Canada Post and the Conservatives are taking an axe to long-treasured postal services -killing good jobst eliminating door-to-door delivery, drastically increasing postage rates and closing, downsizing and reducing hours at post offices:

WHEREAS Canada Post did not properly consult on these changest effectively eliminating any opportunity for input from the people who will be most affected; and

WHEREAS closing and downsizing post offices, reducing post office hours, and eliminating door-to-door delivery will reduce service and eliminate thousands ofjobs in communities throughout our country.

WHEREAS Canada Post offers a public service that needs to be protected;

BE IT RESOLVED THAT the (name of municipality) write a letter to the Minister responsible for Canada Post that calls on the government to reverse the changes to services announced by Canada Post, and to look instead for ways to increase service and revenues in areas such as postal banking.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT (name ofmunicipality) ask the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to request that the federal government consult with the ptJblio about what kind of postal service they need before allowing Canada Post to make such major changes to public postal service.

MAILING INFORMATION

Please send your resolution to: Lisa Raitt, Minister of Transport, Place de Ville, Tower C, 29th Floor, 330 Sparks Street, Ottawa, Ontario, KIA ON5 .

Please send copies of your resolution to: Denis Lemelin, President, Canadian Union of PostaJ Workers, 377 Bank Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K2P 1Y3

Your Member of Parliament. You can get your MP's name, phone number and address by calling 1-800 463-6868 (at no charge) or going to the Parliament of Canada website: http://www.parl.gc.calcommon/index.asp?Language=E.

Brad Woodside, President, Federation of Canadian Municipalities, 24 Clarence St, Ottawa, Ontario K JN 5P3

/bk cope l25

Canadian Union of Postal Workers The struggle continues ----- CLC/CTC • FTO • UNI Syndical des lravallleurs et travailleuses des posies 1..8 /utte continue ~~:..._ RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 183 Attachment 10.1

unreasonable and bad for the corporation's business. It would have been wiser and more reasonable for Canada Post to adopt gradual increases to keep up with rising costs.

3. Make our country the first in the world to eliminate door.. to-door delivery.

Canada Post has annotmced a plan to: Canada Post plans on taking away door to-door delivery from over five million 1. Attack the public postal Canadian households and replacing it network. with community mailbox (CMB) deHvery. There is a great deal of Canada Post plans to use more private opposition to this plan, which will create post offices while streamlining the huge problems for many Canadians, public postal network. This means especially seniors and people with closing and downsizing public post mobility issues. According to a recent offices, as well as reducing their hours. poll, sixty per cent of people oppose the Canada Post has closed about 40 urban delivery cuts. [n spite of this, Canada and 75 ruraJ post offices s1nce 2012. Post is determined to wipe out home This is the largest number of closures we mail delivery within a five year period. have seen since the Conservatives closed So far, Canada Post has announced its about 1,500 rural and urban post offices plans to convert more than a million in the eighties and nineties. More households. The bulk of conversions will closures are expected. The corporation is occur after the 2015 federal election. The also reviewing all urban offices to see if federal government fully supports this they can be made smaller and operated major cut to public postal service. with fewer workers. In addition, it is dramatically reducing hours of service in 4. Destroy 6000 to 8000 rural communities. decent jobs.

2. Introduce huge postage Canada Post would need fewer rate hikes. employees if it goes to community mailbox delivery. It expects to eliminate On March 31, 2014, the price of buying 6000 to 8000 positions. Closing and one stamp increased by 59% while the downsizing post offices and reducing price of buying a book or post office hours will also reduce the coil of stamps increased by 35%. The number ofjobs in communities price for pre·sorted and incentive letters throughout the country. Our increased by 15% and metred mail conununities and our economy cannot increased by 19%. These sudden and afford to lose thousands of decent paying dramatic increases are unfair, jobs. RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 184 Attachment 10.1

The future of Canada Postal banking Post The Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) believes that our country needs Canada Post and the Conservatives improved financial and banking services should consult on their plan to change and that Canada Post is well placed to public postal service as we know it. The fulfill this need. Moreover, the union public owns Canada Post. They have a thinks that adding financial and banking right to input. This has not really services at Canada Post will help the happened in any meaningful way. corporation preserve public postal Canada Post engaged in some service and generate revenue. CUPW is discussions, but they were completely not alone. Close to two-thirds of inadequate. The corporation held invite Canadians support Canada Post only meetings in 46 communities and expanding revenue-generating services conducted a largely online public Hke bill payments, insurance and consultation on its future, focusing on banking, according to a poll from April cut. Since this time, over 400 2014. Many municipalities like the idea municipalities and municipal too. About 600 municipalities have organizations have passed resolutions or passed resolutions endorsing the addition sent letters protesting the cuts or asking of financial and banking services at our for a halt until there is meaningful public post office. Not only that, three consultation. Moreover, many former Canada Post Presidents have thousands of Canadians have signed spoken favourably about the corporation petitions and sent messages to their getting more involved in financial Members of Parliament (MPs). People services (i.e. Michael Warren, Andre have asked their federal representatives Ouellet and Moya Greene). In recent to tell Canada Post to stop the cuts and years, Canada Post has even conducted consider alternatives such as postal studies on postal banking that appear to banking. Cutting might help Canada Post indicate that getting into financial with its money problems in the short services would be "a win-win strategy" term but it is not a good long-term and a "proven money-maker" for the strategy and it certainly won't improve corporation. This positive assessment the future of postal service in our was obtained through an Access to country. The corporation should be Infonnation (ATI) request. following the lead of other postal Unfortunately, 701 of811 pages ofthe administrations by innovating and ATI request were redacted. To date, introducing new revenue-generating Canada Post President Deepak Chopra services. has refused to release the 811 pages in For more Information, go to: their entirety. Learn more. Check out Why Canada Needs Postal Banking at Sawe https://www.policyalternatives.ca/public Canada ations/reports/why-canada-needs-postal P•sc... banking cupe 1979/eope 225 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 185 Attachment 12.1

City of Port Moody

Minutes

Environmental Protection Committee

Minutes of the regular meeting of the Environmental Protection Committee held on Monday, November 17, 2014.

Present Councillor Rick Glumac, Vice-Chair John Callaghan Paul Carey Jeff Congram Virginia Dragan Bryan Fitzpatrick Elaine Golds Michael Muttersbach Jutta Rickers-Haunerland

Absent Councillor Rosemary Small, Chair (Regrets) Gregory Cossey Tina Mohebbi

In Attendance Margot Davis, Manager of Sustainability Tracey Takahashi, Committee Coordinator

1. Call to Order

Call to Order 1.1 Councillor Glumac called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.

2. Adoption of Minutes

Minutes 2.1 EPC14/018 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the minutes of the Environmental Protection Committee meeting held Monday, October 20, 2014 be adopted.

3. New Business

Council Update 3.1 Tree Retention Bylaw and the Tree Management on City Property Policy – Councillor Glumac reported that both of these items have been deferred by Council for public consultation. Staff noted that a proposed public consultation plan will likely be presented to Council in December 2014 for implementation in early 2015.

Glass Recycling – Council has decided to implement a monthly

Environmental Protection Committee - 1 - November 17, 2014 #289303 File: 01-0360-20-04-01/2014 Document: 192230 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 186 Attachment 12.1 pickup of glass for recycling. It was noted that an existing vehicle will be retrofitted for collection of glass once a month on the same day as other items are collected. The frequency of pickup will be reviewed at the 6-month point. Glass pickup service will begin sometime in 2015, with collection stations established in the interim. Discussion ensued with regard to recycling of plastic film and Styrofoam, but it was noted that there is currently no system in place for recycling these products.

Environmental 3.2 Staff presented an Environmental Inquiries contact information Inquiries – Contact resource list that will serve as a tool for the City as well as being List posted on the City website for community access. Staff asked for input on the draft document. Discussion ensued, although no **Amended prior to specific changes were suggested. adoption 2015/01/19

Pesticide Bylaw 3.3 Staff reported that there may be merits to review the Pesticide Review Use Control Bylaw. It was noted that the bylaw, as currently written, is too broad to be within municipal jurisdiction. It was **Amended prior to agreed that a review of the bylaw would be considered by the adoption 2015/01/19 committee as a 2015 work plan activity.

Discussion ensued with regard to the Chafer Beetle issues that have recently come up and about getting some information out to the public to support residents in trying to address this issue.

4. Unfinished Business

Draft 2014 Annual 4.1 The following items were added to the suggested areas of focus Report for 2015: Pesticide Bylaw Review, discussion of the European Chafer Beetle, Community energy planning (including District Energy).

EPC14/019 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the draft Environmental Protection Committee 2014 Annual Report be endorsed as amended and forwarded to Council for consideration.

5. Information

Roundtable 5.1 Committee members reported on various events and activities. Update Discussion ensued with regard to food that is served at community events and the effect of farmed salmon on the natural populations of salmon in the oceans.

EPC14/020 Moved, seconded and CARRIED THAT the City of Port Moody adopt a policy that requires food served at all internal and City-sponsored community events to not include open net farmed salmon.

Environmental Protection Committee - 2 - November 17, 2014 #289303 File: 01-0360-20-04-01/2014 Document: 192230 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 187 Attachment 12.1

6. Adjournment

Councillor Glumac adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m.

Councillor Rick Glumac, Tracey Takahashi, Acting Chair Committee Coordinator

Environmental Protection Committee - 3 - November 17, 2014 #289303 File: 01-0360-20-04-01/2014 Document: 192230 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 188 Attachment 12.1

MINUTES

Port Moody Public Library Board Thursday, November 20, 2014 ParkLane Room

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Port Moody Public Library Board held on Thursday, November 20, 2014 in the ParkLane Room, Library.

Present Linda Martin (Chair) Jacquie Boyer Susan Croll Katherine Fraser Errin Morrison Rosario Passes dir. Zoe Royer

Regrets Barbara Nuttall Jo-Anne Parneta

In Attendance Lynne Russell, Library Director Michael DeKoven, Deputy Director

Call to Order 1. Call to Order

The Chair called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m.

Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of Agenda

Moved by Susan Croll and seconded

THAT the agenda of the regular Library Board meeting of November 20, 2014 be approved.

Carried.

Consent Agenda 3. Consent Agenda

Moved by Katherine Fraser and seconded

THAT all items on the consent agenda be approved or received for information as noted including: 3.1 Minutes of regular Library Board meeting of October 16, 2014 (approval) 3.2 Library Director's Report (information) 3.3 Media Coverage (information) 3.4 Customer Feedback (information)

Minutes - Regular Meeting of the Library Board - November 20, 2014 -1 - Document: 289584 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 189 Attachment 12.1

Carried.

4- New Business

Committee 4,1 Committee Representatives Representatives Library Board Chair, Linda Martin, indicated that two trustees, Susan Croll and Barbara Nuttall, had decided not to continue for another two-year term on the Library Board. She thanked them for their contributions.

Library Board representation on the Links to Literacy Golf Committee was discussed. Linda Martin was asked to follow-up in order to clarify interest in participation on this committee in 2015.

Linda Martin indicated than an email had been received from the City's Committee Coordinator stating that Rosario Passos (who had agreed to continue as the Board's representative on the Arts and Culture Committee) is not eligible for reappointment. This is due to the fact that Ms. Passos has served the maximum of four consecutive terms on the Committee.

Linda Martin then asked if any other trustees were interested in serving as the Library Board's representative on the Arts and Culture Committee for 2015. Jacquie Boyer indicated that she would be willing to take on this responsibility. The Library Director was asked to forward this information to the City's Committee Coordinator.

Annual Report 2013 4.2 Library Annual Report 2013

The Library's Annual Report for 2013 was received for information.

Library Material 4.3 Library Material Vending Machine Vending Machine Library Deputy Director, Michael DeKoven, presented a report on library material vending machines that was prepared at the request of the Library Board. Considerable discussion followed.

Moved by Cllr. Royer and seconded

THAT the report dated November 13, 2014 regarding Library Material Vending Machines be received for information with thanks.

Carried.

Minutes - Regular Meeting of the Library Board - November 20, 2014 -2- Document: 289584 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 190 Attachment 12.1

It was subsequently agreed that staff should not proceed any further with developing a business case for this initiative due to the high costs of establishing such a service.

Considerable interest was expressed in exploring options for encouraging informal book exchanges in the community. The Director indicated that this is an item on the library's current Strategic Initiatives Plan for 2014. It was agreed that the topic should be brought back to the Library Board for discussion in 2015.

5. Reports from Board Committees/Representatives

Arts & Culture 5.1 Arts & Culture Committee Committee No report.

BCLTA 5.2 BCLTA

No report

Council Representative 5.3 Council Representative's Trustee Update

Cllr Royer provided a brief update.

Golf Committee 5.4 Golf Committee

No report.

InterLINK 5.5 InterLINK

Errin Morrison indicated that InterLINK would be undertaking a full strategic planning process in 2015.

Round Table 6. Round Table

There were brief round table updates from trustees.

Adjournment 7. Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.

Minutes - Regular Meeting of the Library Board - November 20, 2014 -3- Dooument: 289584 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 191 Attachment 12.2

Ministre de !'Infrastructure, Minister of Infrastructure, des Collectivites et des Affaires intergouvernementales Communities and Intergovernmental Affairs et ministre de I'Agence de developpement and Minister of the Economic Development Agency economique du Canada pour les regions du Quebec of Canada for the Regions of Quebec

Ottawa, Canada K1A 1MB

JAN 2 9 2015

His Worship Mike Clay Mayor City of Port Moody 100 Newport Drive Port Moody, British Columbia V3H 3E1

Dear Mayor Clay:

Thank you for your correspondence of November 25, 2014, regarding the Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations (WSER) and federal investments in wastewater infrastructure.

I am very proud that our Government has delivered the New Building Canada Plan (NBCP) to help finance the construction, rehabilitation and enhancement of infrastructure across Canada. The Plan includes over $53 billion for provincial, territorial and municipal infrastructure over 10 years. Combined with investments in federal infrastructure and First Nations' infrastructure, total federal spending for infrastructure will reach $70 billion over the next decade. This is the largest and longest federal investment in Canadian history.

Of the $53 billion under the NBCP, $47 billion consists of new funding for provincial, territorial and municipal infrastructure, starting in 2014-15, through three key funds:

The Community Improvement Fund: $32.2 billion over 10 years consisting of an indexed Gas Tax Fund and the incremental Goods and Services Tax Rebate for municipalities to build roads, public transit, water and wastewater systems, recreational facilities and other community infrastructure across Canada.

The New Building Canada Fund: $14 billion over 10 years in support of major economic infrastructure projects of national, regional and local significance, including $1 billion in funding dedicated to municipalities with fewer than 100,000 residents through the Small Communities Fund.

A renewed P3 Canada Fund: $1.25 billion over 5 years to continue supporting innovative ways to build infrastructure projects faster and provide better value for Canadian taxpayers through public-private partnerships.

. .. 2

Canada FEB 0 3 2015 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 192 Attachment 12.2

- 2-

I am pleased to inform you that wastewater infrastructure is eligible for funding under all components of the NBCP. You can find more information about our programs at www .infrastructure.gc.ca.

I would also note that wastewater infrastructure has been an eligible funding category under several of Infrastructure Canada's previous and existing funding programs. Indeed, since 2006, the federal government has committed approximately $2.1 billion to wastewater infrastructure across Canada. In addition, since 2006, municipalities have invested almost $811 million of the federal Gas Tax Fund towards wastewater projects. Going forward, our Government will continue to provide funding for important improvements to wastewater treatment through all components of the NBCP.

If your officials have any questions or require clarification on any aspect of the NBCP, they should contact Jeff Moore, Assistant Deputy Minister, Policy and Communications, Infrastructure Canada, at [email protected].

As always, I look forward to ongoing collaboration with the City of Port Moody as we continue to make record investments in world-class infrastructure that supports job creation, economic growth and a high quality of life for Canadians in every community across Canada.

Yours sincerely,

c.c. The Honourable Leona Aglukkaq, P.C., M.P. Minister of the Environment RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 193 Attachment 12.2

'1. "' L. L CITY OF PORT MOODY

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR

November 25, 2014

File No. 11-5340-03/2001

The Honourable Denis Lebel, P.C., M.P. Minister of Infrastructure, Communities and Intergovernmental Affairs Infrastructure Canada Suite 1100, 180 Kent Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 086

Dear Minister Lebel:

Re: Support for a New Long-term Dedicated Fund for Wastewater Treatment Upgrades

The new federal Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations establish national standards that will require nearly one quarter of all wastewater treatment systems in Canada to be substantially retrofitted or replaced.

The City of Port Moody supports the federal government's goal of protecting Canadian waters. Municipalities across Canada want to partner with the federal government to ensure that these new federal regulations can be effectively implemented.

A conservative estimate by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) shows that meeting the regulations will require capital expenditures in excess of $18 billion dollars, with at least $3.4 billion of those c_9sts being incurred before 2020.

While wastewater treatment is an eligible category under the New Building Canada Fund, this funding mechanism alone will not be sufficient to enable municipalities to comply with the new regulations without cancelling other local infrastructure priorities that are critical to sustained economic growth and job creation, or unfairly increasing property taxes and utility rates on local taxpayers.

. .. 2

100 Newport Drive, Port Moody, B.C. Y3H 3£1 Telephone: 604.469.4515 Fax: 604.469.4664 RC - Agenda - 2015 02 10 194 Attachment 12.2 Support for a New Long-term Dedicated Fund for Wastewater Treatment Upgrades June 17,2014

As an example, the City of Port Moody is a member of Metro Vancouver's Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District, which has a 100-year history of providing regional-scale liquid waste management services to the many municipalities that comprise Metro Vancouver, the regional government for the greater Vancouver area. The Lions Gate Secondary Wastewater Treatment Plant is a new projeot that is mandated under the Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations, and is wholeheartedly supported by the municipal members of the Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District. Metro Vancouver has been actively pursuing Building Canada Fund support for the plant from both the federal and provincial governments for a number of years now, but given the estimated $700 million cost of this project, the allocation of a federal contribution from the New Building Canada allotment for BC would mean reduced funding for other municipal infrastructure priorities in BC.

The City of Port Moody therefore joins FCM in calling for a new long-term dedicated federal fund matched by local and provincial governments to assist communities with the capital cost of rebuilding their wastewater systems.

FCM together with communities across Canada affected by the Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations, look forward to partnering with your government to deliver jobs, economic prosperity, and a clean environment for all Canadians.

Yours truly,

Mike Clay Mayor

cc: The Honourable Leona Aglukkaq, Minister of the Environment cc: The Honourable Joe Oliver, Minister of Finance cc: The Honourable Coralee Oakes, Minister of Community, Sport and Cultural Development, Province of British Columbia cc: The Honourable Todd Stone, Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure, Province of British Columbia cc: The Honourable Mary Polak, Minister of Environment, Province of British Columbia cc: Regional Member of Parliament cc: Local Members of Parliament cc: Brad Woodside, President, Federation of Canadian Municipalities