DOCSLIB.ORG

What Threat Do Native Avian Predators Pose to Hawaiian Honeycreepers? Two Cases of Predation by Pueo (Asio Flammeus Sandwichensis) Hanna L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Threat Do Native Avian Predators Pose to Hawaiian Honeycreepers? Two Cases of Predation by Pueo (Asio Flammeus Sandwichensis) Hanna L Journal of the Hawaii Audubon Society For the Protection of Hawaii’s Native Wildlife VOLUME 68, NUMBER‘EL 3 EPAIO APRIL 2008 What Threat Do Native Avian Predators Pose To Hawaiian Honeycreepers? Two Cases Of Predation By Pueo (Asio Flammeus sandwichensis) Hanna L. Mounce1 Habitat loss, disease and introduced predators are widely During the past two breeding seasons (2006 and 2007) in recognized for their negative effects on Hawaiian honeycreepers the Hanawï Natural Area Reserve (NAR), researchers with (Scott et al. 1986, Pratt 2005). Although it is often difficult to the Maui Forest Bird Recovery Project (MFBRP) documented assess the relative importance of each of these threats, predation Pueo depredating honeycreepers on two occasions. In the by non-native species is often cited as a key contributor to the early afternoon of 21 April 2006, while observing a Maui loss of endemic Hawaiian forest birds (Atkinson 1977; Scott Parrotbill (Pseudonestor xanthophrys) nest containing a single et al. 1986; Banko 1992). Overwhelming evidence indicates chick, a Pueo was observed soaring over the area. Later that that rats (Rattus sp.) are key predators of island birds (Atkinson day, presumably the same Pueo was observed approaching the 1985; King 1985; Thibault et al. 2002; Veitch & Clout 2002) nest tree. The brooding female immediately flew off the nest and the effect of invasive mammals on island populations and suggesting a behavioral response to the aerial predator and ecosystems is well documented (Coblentz 1990; Dowding & the owl quickly perched in the top of the nest tree. The nest Murphy 2001; Levy 2003; Nogales et al. 2004). In Hawai‘i was confirmed to be empty immediately after the owl’s visit, the black rat (R. rattus), the Norway rat (R. norvegicus), the suggesting that the owl had depredated the Parrotbill nestling. Polynesian rat (R. exulans), the small Indian mongoose This is the first observation of a Pueo taking a Maui Parrotbill. (Herpestes auropunctatus) and the feral cat (Felis catus) are On 8 May 2007, a Pueo was observed flying toward and eliciting well-established and predators of native Hawaiian birds (Ziegler loud alarm calls from at least two adult ‘Apapane (Himatione 2002). Conversely, there is relatively little information on the sanguinea). The two ‘Apapane dispersed and the owl returned frequency or details of predation events by native predators to a perch where it was observed consuming an ‘Apapane. It on native birds. For example, there is only one documented could not be determined whether the depredated ‘Apapane was observation of a Pueo, the Hawaiian Short-eared Owl (Asio a fledgling or a nestling but it appeared to be a young bird from flammeus sandwichensis), taking a native forest bird (i.e., Palila the plumage characteristics that were visible. (Loxioides bailleui), S. Fancy, National Biological Survey, pers. In both cases, the behavioral response of the native forest comm., from Mostello 1996). birds indicated that the Pueo was recognized as a predator. On Historically, Hawai‘i supported a number of avian predators two other occasions in Hanawï NAR, native honeycreepers and (Ziegler 2002) although only three exist today, two native and continued on page 20 one introduced: the Pueo, the ‘Io or Hawaiian Hawk (Buteo solitarius), and the Common Barn Owl (Tyto alba). The Hawaiian Hawk is the only remaining native Buteo and is restricted to the island of Hawai‘i. The Common Barn Owl was introduced in the 1950s to control rodent populations (Tomich 1962) but the history of the Pueo in Hawai‘i is not as clear. The Pueo is considered a native subspecies of the globally distributed Short- eared Owl although sub-fossils indicate that its arrival post- Hawaiian Short- dated that of humans (Olson & James 1982). During Polynesian eared Owl (Pueo, settlement, the creation of more open landscapes through Asio flammeus sandwichensis). This deforestation combined with the introduction of the Polynesian endemic race occurs rat likely promoted the species’ establishment (H. James, pers. on all main islands, comm.). Both owls are found on all the main Hawaiian Islands but is most common and on the island of Maui, the Pueo is the only extant native on Kaua‘i, Maui, and predator. Although, the competitive interactions of Pueo and Hawai‘i. It is listed as other introduced avian and mammalian predators have been endangered on O‘ahu examined (Mostello 1996), the role of Pueo in native Hawaiian by the State of Hawai‘i. ecosystems is poorly understood. Photo by Tom Dove. ‘ELEPAIO • 68:3 • APRIL 2008 19 continued from page 19 maximum of one young per year (Simon et al. 2000, MFBRP non-native passerines were observed mobbing a perched Pueo unpubl. data). Further, the Maui Parrotbill has very low nest and alarm calling loudly for up to 10 minutes until the Pueo flew success and is vulnerable to increases in nest predation. As part off, and on two further occasions a Pueo flying above the forest of our work, we control rats and small Indian mongoose, thus canopy was accompanied by alarm calls, though somewhat lowering the risk of nest predation. However, it is unknown if less raucous. In Kaua‘i forests, fledgling Puaiohi, the Small these activities (i.e., reduction of small mammal populations) Kaua‘i Thrush (Myadestes palmeri) also exhibit behaviors result in cat and owl populations switching to diets comprised that may reduce predation by avian predators (Snetsinger et al. of more birds. More research is necessary to determine the 1999). Given that historically a long-legged bird-eating Stilt- effect of removing small mammals on Pueo abundance, and owl (Grallistrix auceps), (Olson & James 1991; Ziegler 2002) the Pueo’s impact on honeycreeper nest success. did occur on Kaua‘i and Maui the observed predator evasion behaviors are not unexpected. Acknowledgements Short-eared Owls consume a variable diet. In Hawai‘i, pellet Our research is made possible through funding from the analyses indicate that mice, birds and rats, respectively are their State of Hawai‘i Division of Forestry and Wildlife, the U.S. Fish most common prey (Snetsinger et al. 1994; Mostello 1996), and and Wildlife Service, and through institutional support from large insects also are taken (Mostello 1996). Birds depredated the University of Hawai‘i, Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit. by Pueo have included passerines, seabirds and shorebirds Thanks to Sheila Conant for her helpful contributions and to (Pyle 1987; Snetsinger et al. 1994; Mostello 1996). Owls in Julia Garvin, Kirsty Swinnerton, Peter Sanzenbacher and David general respond to regional differences in prey abundance. For Leonard for their review and comments of the manuscript. Our example, owls in coastal regions depredate more birds than research is not possible without the dedication and hard work of those occupying interior regions (Holt 1993). The Pueo relies all past and present members of the MFBRP team. more heavily on birds and insects than its continental relatives (Snetsinger et al. 1994), likely because of the low rodent 1 Maui Forest Bird Recovery Project 2465 Olinda Road diversity of the Hawaiian Islands (Mostello 1996). Despite Makawao, HI 96768 this, the Pueo has not been considered a major threat to native forest birds as few honeycreepers have been identified in their Literature Cited pellets. For example, of 248 owl pellets examined by Snetsinger Atkinson, I. A. E. 1977. A reassessment of factors, particularly (1994) and Mostello (1996), only one ‘Apapane, two ‘Amakihi Rattus rattus L., that influenced the decline of endemic (Hemignathus virens) and five ‘I‘iwi (Vestiaria coccinea) were forest birds in the Hawaiian Islands. Pacific Science identified. However, Mostello (1996) determined that 15% of 31:109-130. the bird remains in Pueo pellets were juveniles, and could not Atkinson, I. A. E. 1985. The spread of commensal species of be identified to species. Undoubtedly a portion of these bones Rattus to oceanic islands and their effects on island were those of native birds, as Snetsinger et al. (2005) attributed avifaunas. ICBP Technical Publication 10:35-81. Banko, P. C. 1992. Constraints on productivity of wild Nene 10% of nest failures of the Puaiohi to Pueo. or Hawaiian Geese Branta sandvicensis. Wildfowl Observations indicate that Pueo are more common in 43:99-106. Hanawï NAR during the honeycreeper breeding seasons than Coblentz, B. E. 1990. Exotic organisms: a dilemma for during the rest of the year, and Pueo may be shifting habitat in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 4:261- response to an abundant and easily captured food source (see 265. Mostello 1996). If this is the case, they may be more of a threat to Dowding, J. E., and E. C. Murphy. 2001. The impact of predation native species than previously appreciated. The Maui Parrotbill by introduced mammals on endemic shorebirds in population is estimated at 500 individuals + 230 (Scott et al. New Zealand: a conservation perspective. Biological Conservation 99:47-64. 1986). Unlike other honeycreepers, Maui Parrotbill produce a continued on page 21 Board Roster: Committee Chairs: ‘Elepaio ISSN 0013-6069 John Harrison President Conservation: Norma Bustos Managing Editor: Lydi Morgan Wendy Johnson, First Vice President Education: Wendy Johnson Scientific Editor: Ron Walker Ron Walker, Second Vice President Elepaio: Ron Walker The ‘Elepaio is printed on recyled paper and published nine times per Liz Kumabe, Recording Secretary Field Trips: vacant year: February, March, April, May, June/July, August/September, Carol Bebb, Director Fundraising: vacant October, November, and December/January Phil Burner, Director Grants & Scholarships: Phil Bruner 850 Richards Street, Suite 505 Arlene Buchholz, Director Membership: vacant Honolulu, HI 96813 Norma Bustos, Director Program: Arlene Buchholz Phone/Fax: (808) 528-1432 Publications: Linda Paul E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.hawaiiaudubon.com Staff: Website: Lydi Morgan Lydi Morgan, Office Manager Pacific Fisheries Coalition (PFC) (a project of HAS) Linda Paul, Executive Director for Aquatics Tel: (808) 262-6859 Website: www.pacfish.org 20 ‘ELEPAIO • 68:3 • APRIL 2008 continued from page 20 Holt, D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hulu the Palila, Activity 4
    ACTIVITY 3: Find my favorite things! Hi! It’s Hulu again. I’m a Palila, a finch-billed Hawaiian honeycreeper. We only live in Hawai‘i. Would you like to know a little more about me? My favorite food: seeds from the māmane tree. This plant has beautiful yellow flowers, is in the pea and bean family, and is only found in Hawaii (endemic to Hawaii). Other foods I like: naio berries, caterpillars. Where I live: on the upper slopes of Mauna Kea on Hawai‘i Island. I like to live where the māmane tree can be found. Unfortunately, there aren’t so many of these trees left because the dryland forest got destroyed! Some places where my family used to live: not only Mauna Kea, but also on Mauna Loa and Hualālai; my family used to live in an area 10X bigger than now! Nesting materials: I used grasses, stems, roots, lichen and branch bark from the māmane tree to build my nest. And usually I raise two eggs at a time. My favorite place to visit: the Keauhou Bird Conservation Center Discovery Forest. Check out the next page to see if you can find words about me. Till next time, A hui hou! Hulu P.S. Watch your inbox. I’ll see you again soon! © 2020. Hawai‘i Forest Institute. All rights reserved. Things you learned about me this time Things you learned about me last time - Find the words! and this time – Find the words! g w r f m v c n e u h i c d e s h e e p m u a g v l z h e e j c h a l i f a a w s a x y f u v n t u j o q l c q a i n n j h n a m o d e x g t l t b j j h d u n q z s x i b p l d a k e p e o o w b g e h a c l l t d i i g o n r q i l u o a
    [Show full text]
  • BIRDCONSERVATION the Magazine of American Bird Conservancy Fall 2016 BIRD’S EYE VIEW a Life Shaped by Migration
    BIRDCONSERVATION The Magazine of American Bird Conservancy Fall 2016 BIRD’S EYE VIEW A Life Shaped By Migration The years have rolled by, leaving me with many memories touched by migrating birds. Migrations tell the chronicle of my life, made more poignant by their steady lessening through the years. still remember my first glimmer haunting calls of the cranes and Will the historic development of of understanding of the bird swans together, just out of sight. improved relations between the Imigration phenomenon. I was U.S. and Cuba nonetheless result in nine or ten years old and had The years have rolled by, leaving me the loss of habitats so important to spotted a male Yellow Warbler in with many memories touched by species such as the Black-throated spring plumage. Although I had migrating birds. Tracking a Golden Blue Warbler (page 18)? And will passing familiarity with the year- Eagle with a radio on its back Congress strengthen or weaken the round and wintertime birds at through downtown Milwaukee. Migratory Bird Treaty Act (page home, this springtime beauty was Walking down the Cape May beach 27), America’s most important law new to me. I went to my father for each afternoon to watch the Least protecting migratory birds? an explanation of how I had missed Tern colony. The thrill of seeing this bird before. Dad explained bird “our” migrants leave Colombia to We must address each of these migration, a talk that lit a small pour back north. And, on a recent concerns and a thousand more, fire in me that has never been summer evening, standing outside but we cannot be daunted by their extinguished.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt. Tabor Park Breeding Bird Survey Results 2009
    The Mount Tabor Invasive Plant Control and Revegetation Project and its affects on birds INTRODUCTION In order to reestablish a healthier native forest environment and improve the health of the watershed, a multi-year project is underway at Mt. Tabor Park to remove invasive plants. Actual removal of non-native species, the planting of native species, and other tasks began in September 2010. So as to monitor how these changes would affect the native bird species on Mt. Tabor, breeding bird and area search surveys were begun in 2009. BES created the protocol for the point counts. Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. set up 24 avian point count stations and conducted the initial year of surveys. Station 10 was later deemed unsuitable and data was not collected at this location. During years two and three Audubon Society of Portland conducted the surveys (2010 and 2011). Due to the large number of point count stations that had to be surveyed between dawn and midmorning, each survey was conducted over a two-day span. Full surveys were conducted three times per year during the breeding season (May 15-June 31). The following results were based on birds recorded within 50 meters of each Point Count Station. The BES Watershed Revegetation group designated 14 different units to be treated. Revegetation Unit Map: BES 3.14.12 Page 1 Point Count Station Location Map: The above map was created by Herrera and shows where the point count stations are located. Point Count Stations are fairly evenly dispersed around Mt. Tabor in a variety of habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • L O U I S I a N A
    L O U I S I A N A SPARROWS L O U I S I A N A SPARROWS Written by Bill Fontenot and Richard DeMay Photography by Greg Lavaty and Richard DeMay Designed and Illustrated by Diane K. Baker What is a Sparrow? Generally, sparrows are characterized as New World sparrows belong to the bird small, gray or brown-streaked, conical-billed family Emberizidae. Here in North America, birds that live on or near the ground. The sparrows are divided into 13 genera, which also cryptic blend of gray, white, black, and brown includes the towhees (genus Pipilo), longspurs hues which comprise a typical sparrow’s color (genus Calcarius), juncos (genus Junco), and pattern is the result of tens of thousands of Lark Bunting (genus Calamospiza) – all of sparrow generations living in grassland and which are technically sparrows. Emberizidae is brushland habitats. The triangular or cone- a large family, containing well over 300 species shaped bills inherent to most all sparrow species are perfectly adapted for a life of granivory – of crushing and husking seeds. “Of Louisiana’s 33 recorded sparrows, Sparrows possess well-developed claws on their toes, the evolutionary result of so much time spent on the ground, scratching for seeds only seven species breed here...” through leaf litter and other duff. Additionally, worldwide, 50 of which occur in the United most species incorporate a substantial amount States on a regular basis, and 33 of which have of insect, spider, snail, and other invertebrate been recorded for Louisiana. food items into their diets, especially during Of Louisiana’s 33 recorded sparrows, Opposite page: Bachman Sparrow the spring and summer months.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Goldfinches and Finch Food!
    A Purple Finch (left) en- Frequently Asked Questions joys Sunflower Hearts and About Finch FOOD: an American goldfinch (right, in winter plumage) B i r d s - I - V i e w munches on a 50/50 blend Q. What do Finches eat? of Sunflower heart chips A. Finches utilize many small grass seeds and and Nyjer Seed . flower seed in nature and are built to shell tiny Frequently Asked Questions seeds easily. At Backyard Bird feeders they will Q. Do Goldfinches migrate in winter? FAQ consume Nyjer Seed (traditionally referred to as A. In much of the US, including the Mid- “thistle” in the bird feeding industry, but now west, Goldfinch are year-round residents. about more correctly referred to as “Nyjer”). They also There are areas of the US that only experi- consume Black Oil sunflower Seed and LOVE ence Goldfinch in the Winter and parts of Goldfinches and Sunflower HEARTS whether whole or in fine northern US and Canada only have them chips. In recent years, more and more backyard during breeding season. Check out the nota- Finch Food! birders are feeding Sunflower hearts (which ble difference between the Goldfinch’s does not have a shell) either alone or combined plumage in the winter and during breeding with the traditional Nyjer seed (which DOES season on the cover of this brochure! Q. What other finches can I see at feeders used by Goldfinch? A. Year-round House Finch as well as non- finch family birds like chickadees, tufted Titmouse, and Downy Woodpecker will en- joy your finch feeder.
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of the Common Chaffinch Fringilla Coelebs and European Greenfinch Carduelis Chloris from Lord Howe Island
    83 AUSTRALIAN FIELD ORNITHOLOGY 2004, 2I , 83- 85 First Records of the Common Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs and European Greenfinch Carduelis chloris from Lord Howe Island GLENN FRASER 34 George Street, Horsham, Victoria 3400 Summary Details are given of the first records of two species of finch from Lord Howe Island: the Common Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs and the European Greenfinch Carduelis chloris. These records, from the early 1980s, have been quoted in several papers without the details hav ing been published. My Common Chaffinch records are the first for the species in Australian territory. Details of my records and of other published records of other European finch es on Lord Howe Island are listed, and speculation is made on the origin of these finches. Introduction This paper gives details of the first records of the Common Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs and the European Greenfinch Carduelis chloris for Lord Howe Island. The Common Chaffinch records are the first for any Australian territory and although often quoted (e.g. Boles 1988, Hutton 1991, Christidis & Boles 1994), the details have not yet been published. Other finches, the European Goldfinch C. carduelis and Common Redpoll C. fiammea, both rarely reported from Lord Howe Island, were also recorded at about the same time. Lord Howe Island (31 °32'S, 159°06'E) lies c. 800 km north-east of Sydney, N.S.W. It is 600 km from the nearest landfall in New South Wales, and 1200 km from New Zealand. Lord Howe Island is small (only 11 km long x 2.8 km wide) and dominated by two mountains, Mount Lidgbird and Mount Gower, the latter rising to 866 m above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Evidence for a Diverse Biota from Kaua'i and Its Transformation Since
    Ecological Monographs, 71(4), 2001, pp. 615±641 q 2001 by the Ecological Society of America FOSSIL EVIDENCE FOR A DIVERSE BIOTA FROM KAUA`I AND ITS TRANSFORMATION SINCE HUMAN ARRIVAL DAVID A. BURNEY,1,5 HELEN F. J AMES,2 LIDA PIGOTT BURNEY,1 STORRS L. OLSON,2 WILLIAM KIKUCHI,3 WARREN L. WAGNER,2 MARA BURNEY,1 DEIRDRE MCCLOSKEY,1,6 DELORES KIKUCHI,3 FREDERICK V. G RADY,2 REGINALD GAGE II,4 AND ROBERT NISHEK4 1Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University, Bronx, New York 10458 USA 2National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560 USA 3Kaua`i Community College, Lihu`e, Hawaii 96766 USA 4National Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawa`i, Hawaii 96756 USA Abstract. Coring and excavations in a large sinkhole and cave system formed in an eolianite deposit on the south coast of Kaua`i in the Hawaiian Islands reveal a fossil site with remarkable preservation and diversity of plant and animal remains. Radiocarbon dating and investigations of the sediments and their fossil contents, including diatoms, invertebrate shells, vertebrate bones, pollen, and plant macrofossils, provide a more complete picture of prehuman ecological conditions in the Hawaiian lowlands than has been previously available. The evidence con®rms that a highly diverse prehuman landscape has been com- pletely transformed, with the decline or extirpation of most native species and their re- placement with introduced species. The stratigraphy documents many late Holocene extinctions, including previously un- described species, and suggests that the pattern of extirpation for snails occurred in three temporal stages, corresponding to initial settlement, late prehistoric, and historic impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Permit: Te-25955C-1 January 01, 2019
    REPORT TO THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR HAWAIIAN STILT ENDANGERED SPECIES PERMIT: TE-25955C-1 REPORTING PERIOD JANUARY 01, 2019 – DECEMBER 31, 2019 SUBMITTED BY: Melissa R. Price Assistant Professor University of Hawaii-Manoa 1910 East-West Road Sherman Hall Rm 118 Honolulu, HI 96822 Phone: 808-956-7774 Email: [email protected] January 31, 2020 1 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 The Hawaiian Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni) is an endangered subspecies of the 4 Black-necked stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) that inhabits wetlands throughout the Hawaiian 5 Islands. Depredation of eggs and chicks by introduced predators is a major threat to Hawaiian 6 Stilt populations. Where and when a bird decides to nest may impact the likelihood of egg or 7 chick depredation. Nesting in close proximity to water may decrease depredation rates by 8 mammals, as water can act as a barrier to mammalian predators, does not hold scent, and 9 provides an obstacle-free escape route for chicks. Alternatively, some mammalian predators may 10 be attracted to water, and a number of aquatic species have been identified as predators of 11 Hawaiian Stilt chicks, including the American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus). Vegetation 12 height is also an important factor for egg and chick survival, as taller vegetation may help 13 conceal nests and chicks from predators, particularly aerial species. Additionally, depredation is 14 often not constant across the breeding season due to changes in parental activity, nest and chick 15 abundance, or habitat characteristics. The Hawaiian Stilt nests from February to September 16 across the Hawaiian Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Pueo Or Hawaiian Short-Eared Owl Asio Flammeus Sandwichensis
    Raptors Pueo or Hawaiian Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus sandwichensis SPECIES STATUS: State listed as Endangered on O‘ahu Photo: NRCS State recognized as Endemic at the subspecies level NatureServe Heritage Rank G5/T2 – Species secure/Subspecies imperiled SPECIES INFORMATION: The pueo, or Hawaiian short-eared owl, is an endemic subspecies of the nearly pandemic short-eared owl (Asio flammeus; Family: Strigidae). The species is thought to have colonized the Hawaiian Islands sometime after the arrival of Polynesians. Unlike most owls, pueo are active during the day (i.e., diurnal), and are commonly seen hovering or soaring over open areas. Like short-eared owls in continental environments, those in Hawai‘i primarily consume small mammals. Their relatively recent establishment on Hawai‘i may have been tied to the rats (Rattus exulans) that Polynesians brought to the islands. Little is known about the breeding biology of pueo, but nests have been found throughout the year. Males perform aerial displays known as a sky dancing display to prospective females. Nests are constructed by females and are comprised of simple scrapes in the ground lined with grasses and feather down. Females also perform all incubating and brooding. Males feed females and defend nests. Chicks hatch asynchronously and are fed by female with food delivered by male. Young may fledge from nest on foot before they are able to fly and depend on their parents for approximately two months. DISTRIBUTION: Found on all the Main Hawaiian Islands from sea level to 2,450 meters (8,000 feet). ABUNDANCE: Unknown. Because of relatively few detections, the Hawaiian Forest Bird Survey did not estimate the population size of the pueo.
    [Show full text]