Republic of Serbia Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-Government
February 2020
ANNUAL REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION PLAN OF THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM STRATEGY FOR 2018-2020 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
RESULTS ACTIVITIES EXECUTIVE Reforms take SUMMARY place where results activities 53% 47% citizens live implemented implemented
Subotica INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION Sombor Together for people with disabilities, facilitating their access to information and services Implemented 16 53% Implemented 20 47% Together in fighting natural disasters and emer- Ongoing - - Ongoing 22 51% gencies Not implemented 14 47% Not implemented 1 2%
Novi Sad OPEN DATA Public transport available on Google Maps BUDGET
Stara BUDGET FUNDS DONOR FUNDS Pazova MUNICIPALITIES OF SERBIA Planned Spent Planned Spent Beograd Šabac in open data 109,661,942 RSD 107,467,782 RSD 7,855,000 RSD 7,855,000 RSD https://opstine.data.gov.rs/ Loznica
Mali vornik Lazarevac Krupanj Smederevska Osečina Palanka SERVICES UNDER A SINGLE ROOF
Ljubovija Rača One-stop shops Gornji Milanovac Kragujevac 98% 100% Bajina Kosjerić Bašta Požega Čačak PERFORMANCE BY INSTITUTION Užice Knić Lučani Institution Implemented Not started Ongoing Total Percentage Čajetina Arilje Kraljevo Trstenik ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCY 1 0 0 1 100% Priboj Kruševac Ivanjica Vrnjačka Banja STATE AUDIT INSTITUTION Nova 0 0 1 1 0% Varoš Aleksandrovac OFFICE FOR IT AND E-GOVERNMENT 1 0 2 3 33.33% Niš Bela OFFICE FOR COOPERATION WITH CIVIL SOCIETY Raška Palanka 1 0 1 2 50% MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL SELF- Kuršumlija 7 1 12 20 35% Novi Pazar GOVERNMENT Vlasotince MINISTRY OF LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT, VETERAN AND SOCIAL Tutin 0 0 1 1 0% AFFAIRS STABLE PUBLIC FINANCES MINISTRY OF JUSTICE 3 0 0 3 100% MINISTRY OF FINANCE 2 0 2 4 50%
NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 1 0 0 1 100% GOVERNMENT COMMISSIONER FOR INFORMATION OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE AND 0 0 1 1 0% BUDGET SURPLUS PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION bn GOVERNMENT DEBT PUBLIC POLICY SECRETARIAT 2 0 0 2 100% 12.8 RSD REPUBLIC GEODETIC AUTHORITY 0 0 1 1 0% GOVERNMENT debt-to-GDP ratio HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SERVICE 1 0 0 1 100% BUDGET DEFICIT 71.2% in 2015 debt-to-GDP ratio PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OFFICE 1 0 1 2 50% -0.2% of GDP 52.4% in November 2019 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ACA Anti-Corruption Agency Government-to-Citizen, exchange of services NEA National Employment Agency RS Republic of Serbia G2C and information between government and citi- AI Administrative Inspectorate National Programme for the Adoption of the EU RSD Serbian dinar zens NPAA acquis Administration for Joint Services of Republic SAI State Audit Institution AJSRB Government-to-Government, exchange of servic- Bodies G2G OCCS Office for Cooperation with Civil Society es and information among government services SAB(s) State administration body(ies) AP Action Plan Organisation for Economic Co-operation and De- GenSec General Secretariat of the Government OECD Sector Budget Support, EU’s results-based fi- velopment SBS AP23 Chapter 23 Action Plan nancing mechanism HRM Human Resource Management OGP Open Government Partnership BRA Business Registers Agency Standing Conference of Towns and Municipal- HRMS Human Resource Management Service SCTM Office for Information Technology and e-Gov- ities BV Baseline value OITeG HCSC High Civil Service Council ernment SDC Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation CHU Central Harmonisation Unit IMF International Monetary Fund OSS One-stop shop OECD’s Support for Improvement in Governance CMST Change Management Support Team SIGMA IMPG Inter-Ministerial Project Group PA Public administration and Management programme Cont. Continuous(ly) IS Information system PAR Public Administration Reform SORS Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia CROSO Central Registry of Compulsory Social Insurance Information System for planning and reporting Action Plan for the implementation of the Pub- TA Tax Administration ISPRWG CSOs Civil society organisations on the work of the Government PAR AP lic Administration Reform Strategy of the Repub- ТОR Terms of Reference lic of Serbia EC European Commission LSGUs Local self-government units TV Target value PARC Public Administration Reform Council EPC Equality Protection Commissioner MEI Ministry of European Integration UNDP United Nations Development Programme PDIF Pension and Disability Insurance Fund ERP Economic Reform Programme Ministry of Labour, Employment, Veteran and So- MLEVSA USD US dollar cial Affairs PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability EU EUROPEAN UNION WB World Bank MoF Ministry of Finance Public Finance Management Reform Pro- EU IPA EU Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance PFM gramme MoI Ministry of the Interior EUR Euro PIFC Public internal financial control Ministry of Public Administration and Local FMC Financial management and control MPALSG Self-Government Public Internal Financial Control Development PIFCDS FR Functional review Strategy Medium-Term Budgetary Framework – Fiscal MTBF Government-to-Business, exchange of services Strategy PPA Principles of Public Administration G2B and information between government and busi- NACS National Anti-Corruption Strategy 2013–2018 PPO Public Procurement Office nesses NAPA National Academy for Public Administration PPS Public Policy Secretariat
NBS National Bank of Serbia RGA Republic Geodetic Authority
4 5 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
FOREWORD
Branko Ružić
Minister of Public Administration and Local Self-Government
The year 2019 was marked by a comprehensive evaluation of the of us (Serbian: Управа по мери свих нас), we launched a promo- Public Administration Reform Strategy implementation results and tional campaign in 2019 with the support of the Delegation of the the beginning of the preparation of a new strategic document to European Union to Serbia, to raise awareness of the importance cover the period 2021–2030, in accordance with the newly-adopted of the reform and to transform the administration into an efficient, legal framework for public policy planning. open and transparent service for citizens and businesses.
As part of our joint efforts to manage the reforms, we actively used existing coordination structures for public administration reform Continuity in the implementation of reforms in the areas in 2019: two meetings of the Public Administration Reform Coun- of public administration and public finances and readiness cil were held and as many meetings of the Inter-Ministerial Work- to build on the lessons learnt has been confirmed by the ing Group with 24 representatives of the non-governmental sector. new strategic framework which should provide a clear In parallel, up to February 2020, additional five meetings were held vision and estimate the resources Serbia needs to prepare of the Special Working Group tasked with developing a new Public for joining the European Union for the next five years (the Administration Reform Strategy 2021–2030. In collaboration with period covered by the first action plan) or ten years (the the permanent representatives of 6 citizens’ associations and of period of validity of the entire Strategy). the Serbian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, a situation anal- ysis including a problem analysis was prepared, objectives and in- We are particularly proud of the fact that continuity in public ad- dicators for the 10-year period were determined, activity mapping ministration and public finance reforms has been recognised by was started, and hopefully by the end of 2020 a new Public Ad- the European Union – in December 2019, the European Commis- ministration Reform Strategy will be fully developed and adopted. sion approved the disbursement of additional EUR 13,250,000 Administration tailored to suit all of us is only possible with an ac- to the Budget of the Republic of Serbia owing to reform achieve- tive approach of all those affected by the reform – citizens, busi- ments, which is the second approved tranche to Serbia after the nesses, and the administration – and on this occasion I would like first amount of EUR 30.5 million received in 2018 under the Sec- to thank all those who are actively engaged in implementing indi- tor Reform Contract for the Public Administration Reform signed vidual reform measures to build a better governance system and in December 2016. This results-based financial instrument was administrative capacity in Serbia, which is one of the most impor- first implemented in Serbia precisely for the public administration tant preconditions for the implementation of all other reforms in reform. It involves the disbursement of funds only after proven, our country. achieved reforms.
Recognising the importance of communication for success and concerted efforts to achieve an Administration tailored to suit all
7 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
CONTENTS AGGREGATE OVERVIEW
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 30 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE 4 Between August 2018 and April 2019, a GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS (%)5 comprehensive external evaluation1 was Increasing legal certainty and improving the carried out of the results achieved so far 4 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND business environment and quality of public through the implementation of the 2014 service delivery Public Administration Reform (PAR) Strat- ABBREVIATIONS egy. Having reviewed the findings and rec- ommendations of the evaluation, the PAR 2012 1 18 7 FOREWORD Council, as a political level PAR manage- 34 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE 5 ment body, approved the findings and con- Increasing citizens’ participation and trans- solidated the recommendations for the 9 AGGREGATE OVERVIEW parency, improving ethical standards and coming period. The recommendations put 201 0 accountability in performing public administra- service delivery and human resource man- agement in the focus of the future stra- tion tasks 12 KEY RESULTS IN 2019 tegic document, highlighting the need to strengthen and develop effective reform 2018 56.73 coordination and management mecha- 14 OBJECTIVE 1 39 RISKS AND nisms for the period 2021–2030.2 The drafting of a new PAR policy document3, 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Improvement of organisational and functional MITIGATION MEASURES which was one of the evaluation recom- public administration subsystems mendations, would align the PAR strategic 41 Activities taken to implement the framework with the Planning System Law recommendations from the previ- and confirm the continuity of and -readi 20 OBJECTIVE 2 ness for further reforms in the public ad- ning System Law, the adoption of which in and Local Self-Government (MPALSG) has ous 2018 report ministration and public finances sectors 2018 was a starting point for the reform of been developing an online PAR monitoring Establishment of a coherent, merit-based which build on the results and lessons the Serbian public policy planning system. application, its primary source of data be- public service and improvement of human learnt from the previous period. The methodology applied through the UIS ing the UIS (data entered into the inter-sec- resource management 49 Activities to Communicate Public for all public policy documents involves the toral UIS by PAR authorities). The applica- Administration Reform in 2019 As in 2018, the data on the level of imple- labelling of activities and measures as not tion, which is currently in the test phase mentation of the measures foreseen in the started, started (ongoing) and completed. at https://omt.its4test.com/4, should ena- 24 OBJECTIVE 3 Public Administration Reform Action Plan The same methodology was applied to col- ble transparent and up-to-date (real-time) (PAR AP) 2018–2020 for the period 1 Jan- lect and process data for this report. monitoring of reforms, on the one hand, Improvement of public finance management uary–31 December 2019 were collected and serve as a risk management tool to and processed through the Unified Infor- Additionally, in parallel with the European eliminate delays in implementation, on the mation System for Public Policy Planning Union (EU) project for the Sector Budget other hand. and Implementation Monitoring (the UIS). Support (SBS) PAR complementary sup- The UIS has been envisaged by the Plan- port, the Ministry of Public Administration
1 External Evaluation of the Serbian Public Administration Reform Strategy – Final Report, EU project Support to Public Administration Reform under the PAR Sector Reform Contract, April 2019, http://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/190524-Final-Evaluation-Report-SR.pdf (in Serbian) and http://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/190524-Final-Evaluation-Report- EN.pdf (in English) The evaluation exercise addressed five criteria: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and impact. The process involved 52 interviews, 7 focus group discussions and 10 questionnaires. All stakeholders, both on the steering side (the Evaluation Reference Group) and on the participants’ side, were involved: state bodies, international organisations, citizens’ associations, academia, etc. After publishing the Evaluation Report, its findings were presented at three large events to discuss the recommendations and further improve the process of drafting a new strategic document (Inter-Ministerial Working Group meeting, 4–5 June 2019; PAR Council, 13 June 2019; and the first kick-off meeting for the new Strategy 2021–2030, 23 October 2019). Prior to the last one, the Evaluation Reference Group held a meeting on 22 September 2019 to present the lessons learned from the conducted evaluation, aimed at further building the capacity of state bodies (The Evaluation Team of the EU project for the PAR complementary support produced the document Report on the Lessons Learnt from the Evaluation Process which was distributed to key stakeholders). The evaluation findings served as the main inputs for the development of a situation analysis with a problem analysis for all subgroups per thematic areas of EU/OECD Principles of Public Administration by the Special Working Group for the Development of the PAR Strategy 2021–2030 with the first accompanying AP 2021–2025. 2 Conclusions of the PAR Council meeting held on 13 June 2019, link to the Minutes containing the text of the adopted Conclusions: http://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/zapisnik-7-sednica-Saveta-za-RJU.pdf 3 Kick-off Meeting of the Special Working Group for the development of the PAR Strategy 2021–2030, 23 October 2019, link to the news release: http://mduls.gov.rs/saopstenja/ruzic-interes-gradjana-u-fokusu-nove-strategije-reforme-javne-uprave/ 4 After the application is developed, the data will be migrated to the MPALSG subdomain at the URL-address http://monitoring.mduls.gov.rs 5 The World Bank Database on Government Effectiveness Indicators is available at the following link (The report is published at the end of September each year, for the previous year): http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home
8 9 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
REPORTING PROCESS TIMELINE
In accordance with the schedule By 10 January By 20 January By 1 March of meetings
MPALSG sends forms Data collection through UIS, MPALSG finalises The report is and instructions to reports submitted and publishes submitted to all levels contact persons to MPALSG the report of coordination
The data for this report palities in the West Morava basin work to- were collected with regard The international level indicator gether against natural disasters, where- of government effectiveness in- as 8 municipalities in the Drina basin have It should be noted that efficient administra- There were more and more proposals for public policy documents aligned with the to the activities which had dicates Serbia’s stability in all joined forces to operate in emergencies. tion and efficient public finance manage- public policy management methodology in the total number of such documents any quarter of 2019 set as a areas as regards perception of In order to ensure the provision of a num- ment (PFM) are the basis for sustainable adopted by the Government; training in public policy management was delivered; deadline, or which had been the quality of public services, ber of services at one stop, ’under a single economic development and contribute to public consultations were conducted in the earliest stages of the new laws and pub- the quality of the civil service roof’, one-stop shops (OSSs) were opened a country’s macroeconomic stability. In the lic policy documents drafting process in order to ensure greater involvement of cit- shifted from 2018 to 2019 and the degree of its independ- in Lazarevac, Smederevska Palanka, Be- previous period, the fiscal position of the izens and businesses in administration affairs. due to the implementation ence from political pressures, la Palanka, Sombor and Šabac, whereas 6 Republic of Serbia was further improved failure. The rate of implemen- the quality of policy formulation more local self-government units (LSGUs) as a result of reforms. The public finance and implementation, and the received support in 2019 for establishing system was stabilised, as well as the mac- As regards human resource management, Despite the challenges, it is noteworthy tation of the measures6/re- credibility of the government’s OSSs in 2020: the City of Užice, municipali- roeconomic environment, with a down- a competency system was introduced that the 2019 data on planned and spent sults was 53%, whereas the commitment to such policies.8 ties of Gornji Milanovac, Kuršumlija, Vlasot- ward trajectory of public debt the share aimed at further professionalisation of funds almost fully correspond, which is rate of implementation of the ince, Stara Pazova, and Rača. Visuals for of which in the GDP dropped from a high civil servants. Moreover, performance ap- the result of a good estimate of additional the most important social and economic 71.2% in 2015 to 52.9% in December 2019. praisal of organisational units and individ- funds made during the PAR AP 2018–2020 activities was 47%, which is features of Serbian LSGUs were created Economic growth in 2019 was 4.2%, which uals (Chapter 32) was integrated, which is planning process. Similarly, stakeholders’ an improvement compared Unlike the previous report9 which focused through the Open Data Initiative (https:// is similar to the 2018 growth rate of 4.4%.10 a continuation of the reforms being imple- participation in the planning process and 7 on the digitalisation in particular, the 2019 opstine.data.gov.rs/ and https://rsjp.gov. mented also in the framework of strength- observance of all stages of public policy to 2018. In addition to noteworthy results relat- Report indicates that the reform is increas- rs/jls-baza/), whereas by opening of pub- ening financial managerial accountability planning have been foreseen and are al- ed to the fiscal position, local self-govern- ingly addressing citizens’ needs and that lic transport data, citizens in Niš, Kragu- (responsible programme budgeting). ready observed in the development of a ment, digitalisation and sustainable e-gov- more and more results are recognised at jevac, Užice, Subotica and Belgrade can new PAR strategic framework for the next ernment development, the public policy The biggest challenges in the implementa- local level, which is the level of citizens’ access data on all city lines, timetables, period until 2030. management reform was also high on the tion of PAR were the lack of capacity to im- lives where they first turn for help. Thus, stops, routes and fares in public transport agenda. plement all changes in parallel, the delay in through the mechanism of inter-municipal by searching Google Maps. setting up different portals and online ap- cooperation, the cities of Belgrade and No- plications due to overambitious plans and vi Sad and three city municipalities of Bel- prior inadequate preparation, standardisa- grade (Vračar, Savski Venac and Zvezdara) tion and adaptation of various documents identified the problems faced by people to be input into IT systems and the amount with disabilities and jointly came up with of funds to be allocated for digitalisation the ways of facilitating their access to in- purposes, as well as demanding proce- formation and services by establishing dures, and a long period of harmonising a shared unit to provide services through opinions in order to reach consensus with printing materials in braille, creating new a wide range of stakeholders. applications to ensure better exercise of their rights and providing sign language interpreter services. 18 cities and munici-
6 The basic unit of measuring the AP implementation is the “measure”. The measures referred to are those defined in the PAR Strategy. For each measure (which is interpreted as an outcome) indicators were defined which facilitate monitoring the level of achievement of set results (measures), PAR AP 2018–2020, Appendix 1, chapter 1.3.2: http://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/AP-RJU-narativni-deo-2018-2020.pdf 7 43% activities and 46% of results in 2018, see the Report for 2018 on the implementation of PAR AP 2018-2020 at the following link: http://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/PAR_report_28022018_english-1.pdf 8 World Bank indicator – The percentile rank is a country’s rank among all countries covered by an aggregate indicator, ranging from 0 (lowest rank) to 100 (highest rank). Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#reports 9 Reports on the implementation of the public administration reform can be found at http://mduls.gov.rs/reforma-javne-uprave/ (in Serbian) and http://mduls.gov.rs/en/public-administration-reform/ (in English) 10 Finance Minister’s Statement, Ministry of Finance home page as of 11 February 2020: https://www.mfin.gov.rs/
10 11 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
Objective 3 KEY RESULTS control operations by the 22 Improvement of public finance 42 budget inspectorate IN 2019 management
ACTIVITIES RESULTS Value of contracts signed based on а framework agreements over MEASURE 44.5 (public procurement) 35.5 bn Value LEVEL bn achieved in Target Implemented Implemented value 2019 INDICATORS 50% 100% LSGUs budgets prepared according to the programme 73% 78% budgeting methodology
Objective 1 new inter-municipal cooperation Improvement of organisational arrangements to jointly discharge local 2 and functional public adminis- 4 tration subsystems self-government responsibilities Objective 4 Increasing legal certainty and improving the business ACTIVITIES RESULTS bodies electronically environment and quality of inspection services using the unified exchanging data from official public service delivery inspection supervision system 71% records (e-ZUP/Service Bus) 50% 36 33 – еInspector ACTIVITIES RESULTS Implemented Implemented % % 46 57 proposed strategies and action plans Average quality ranking aligned with the public policy Implemented Implemented of training provided at the national management methodology in the 65% 4.5 information access centre 4 85.5% total number of strategies and action % % http://skipcentar.rs/ plans adopted by the Government per 43 33 calendar year.
Objective 2 Establishment of a coherent, Competency framework is used in merit-based public service 2 state administration bodies (SABs) 2 and improvement of human and Government services Objective 5 Increasing citizens’ participation resource management and transparency, improving ethical standards and public administration employees accountability in performing ACTIVITIES RESULTS who have successfully completed public administration tasks implemented professional development recommendations made by 73% 10-20% 78% 15% programmes offered by the ACTIVITIES RESULTS the State Audit Institution National Academy for Public Implemented Implemented Administration (NAPA) cases where legal and % % natural persons acted upon 75 50 Implemented Implemented issued delivered training courses 87.2% recommendations 79.7% implemented by the NAPA % to them by the Equality 70% % Protection Commissioner 88% in accordance with 38 33 annual work plan
12 13 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
RESULTS ACTIVITIES
Implemented Implemented 57% 46% results activities
Implemented 4 57% Implemented 6 46% Ongoing - - Ongoing 7 54% Not implemented 3 43% Not implemented - -
Indicators for Baseline value Target value Achieved value specific objective (2017) (2020) (2019)
Clarity and comprehensiveness of official typology of central Indicator will be 4 5 Government bodies (PAR) measured in 2021
Mechanisms for managerial accountability in the regulatory and Indicator will be 1 2 legislative framework (PAR) measured in 2021
Measure Baseline value Target value Achieved value level indicators (2017) (2019) (2019)
Optimised, coherent and rational structure of public 100% administration - % of measures planned for 2018 from the AP for 0 in 2018 0 HFA
Number of new inter-municipal cooperation arrangements to jointly discharge local self-government responsibilities 0 2 4
Strategic document adopted defining decentralisation policy and reform of local self-Government 0 2 1
The share of the number of proposed strategies and action plans aligned with the public policy management methodology in the total number of strategies and action plans adopted by the 67.9 65 85.5 Government per calendar year.
Share of bodies which electronically exchange data from official records 20 50 71
Share of bodies using data from the Central Population Registry 0 50 0
Share of data from records of citizenship of the Republic of Serbia transferred electronically to the Central Data processing 0 80 80 and Storing System
OBJECTIVE BUDGET RSD
Improvement of organisational BUDGET FUNDS DONOR FUNDS
and functional public Planned Spent Planned Spent 1 administration subsystems 45,190,000 45,190,000 757,000 757,000 100% 100%
15 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020 Objective 1 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
Measure 1.1 under the PAR AP 2018–2020 In practice, in 2019: Additionally, in 2019, the Starting Points tional in terms of medium-term planning. lic policy documents: http://rsjp.gov.rs/ envisages implementation of activities to RESULTS for the preparation of the Programme for Public policy documents adopted in ac- kalkulator/ or the Micro, Small or Medi- regulate managerial accountability and ACHIEVED IN 2019 The cities of Belgrade and Novi Sad and the Local Self-Government Reform in the cordance with the Planning System Law um-Sized Commercial Entities Impact delegate accountability to lower levels, and three city municipalities of Belgrade Republic of Serbia were prepared and ap- are successively input to the UIS. Test for a business regulatory impact (Vračar, Savski Venac and Zvezdara) to ensure a better functioning structure of Measure 1.1 did not yield final results in proved by the PAR Council in 2019. Work assessment: http://rsjp.gov.rs/reforma/ started a common project – they had A Handbook for Managers in SABs on public administration and holders of pub- the previous period. Data collection and in- began to develop the Programme for the #test identified the problems faced by - peo How to Apply the Planning System Law lic powers. The PAR Strategy ascertained tensive consultations are underway to in- Local Self-Government Reform. Func- ple with disabilities and jointly came up – Towards Better Decisions16 was pub- In addition, the general training programme that Serbia did not have a single record of corporate the concept of managerial re- tional reviews were produced for 15 lo- with the ways of facilitating their access lished in July 2019 with the support of for 201917 extended the training system to bodies and other entities by any criterion11; sponsibility through the new PAR strategic cal self-government units and institutions to information and services. One of the the German Development Agency (GIZ). the local level aimed at adequate applica- therefore, this PAR AP foresees for the es- framework 2021–2030. See Objective 2 founded by the local self-government in ways was the establishment of a shared Another document produced by the GIZ tion of the planning system at local level. tablishment of a Register of Holders of and Objective 4 of this Report for more de- order to ensure a more functional organi- unit, located in Zvezdara, to provide ser- is a Draft Gender Equality Impact Test During the first training cycle for LSGUs, Public Powers. tails on individual results. sation of tasks. A Single Inventory of tasks aimed at avoiding adverse effects of vices to people with disabilities through performed at the local government level seven accredited training sessions (Zren- new public policies and regulations on As regards the local self-government re- As regards local self-government, reform printing materials in braille, creating new was developed as an analytical and plan- janin, Zlatibor, Novi Sad, Kragujevac, Niš, specific population groups; form (Measure 1.2), activities are planned activities were focused on fostering in- applications to ensure better exercise of ning tool containing primary and delegat- Šabac and Belgrade) were delivered, co- to result in the adoption of a strategic or ter-municipal cooperation aimed at achiev- their rights and providing sign language ed tasks in certain areas. It is relevant to Draft Handbook on Public Policy Man- ordinated by the Standing Conference of programmatic document determining a ing common interests of several LSGUs, interpreter services; identifying responsibilities of local admin- agement with checklists and forms for Cities and Municipalities, with 108 repre- decentralization policy or local self-govern- and on drafting a public policy document sentatives from 49 local self-governments. In the West Morava basin 18 cities istration, allocating tasks among different public policy document proponents, ment reform, in addition to further support for the LSG reform. The number of new After having passed their tests, 99 partic- and municipalities (Kralјevo, Čačak, levels of government in a more functional guidelines and forms for ex-ante and ex- for the development of inter-municipal co- inter-municipal cooperation arrange- ipants became eligible for the certificate. Kruševac, Užice, Novi Pazar, Vrnjačka manner and more efficient implementation post impact assessments, handbook on operation and capacity building of cities ments to jointly discharge local self-gov- 14 Banja, Trstenik, Knić, Ivanjica, Arilјe, Ko- of regulations. determining public policy costs, hand- and municipalities. ernment responsibilities was twice as high sjerić, Gornji Milanovac, Raška, Požega, book on the consultation and coordina- as the target value set by the PAR AP. The The public policy management reform tion process, and medium-term planning Measure 1.3 covering public policy man- Lučani, Čajetina, Aleksandrovac i Tutin) MPALSG established the Inter-Munici- was the focus of activity in the previous guidelines; agement provides for continuation of ac- joined together for better communica- pal Cooperation Advancement and Es- period. The share of proposals for public tivities on developing legal and methodo- tion and response in case of natural dis- tablishment Fund, with the support of the policy documents aligned with the public Various tools published on the Public logical frameworks for managing public asters; Swiss Government, under which the first policy management methodology in the Policy Secretariat (PPS) website can be policies and linking them with the formula- four inter-municipal partnerships were Eight municipalities (Loznica, Mali total number of such documents adopted used in the process of drafting regula- tion and execution of a programme budget, entered into by 33 municipalities and cit- Zvornik, Osečina, Ljubovija, Bajina Bašta, by the Government was on the rise (from tions and public policy documents, such and for the development of a public poli- ies, aimed at ensuring better services for Krupanj, Nova Varoš i Priboj) in the Dri- 65% in 2018 to 85.5% in 2019). Previous- as the Calculator for possible admin- cy planning and implementation monitor- citizens. In the spirit of the public adminis- na basin are establishing a data collec- ly, the legal framework had been complet- istrative costs of regulations and pub- ing IT system. tration reform and its transformation into tion and exchange system in the area of ed through the adoption of the following emergencies; bylaws: the Decree on the Methodology The e-government development measure a service for citizens and businesses, the mechanism of inter-municipal cooperation for Public Policy Management, Policy and (Measure 1.4) addresses priorities relat- Boljevac and Sokobanja are establishing under the LSG Law enables municipalities Regulatory Impact Assessment, and Con- ed to the establishment or improvement a joint internal audit (IA) service to ad- In the area of e-Government development, indicators point to a steady pro- and cities to join their forces in order to re- tent of Individual Public Policy Documents of registers (Central Register of Citizens, dress the issue of insufficient material gress: 71% of bodies that exchange data from official records electronically spond better to the needs of their respec- and the Decree on the Medium-Term Plan- Metaregister of all records, Register of and human resources.13 (e-ZUP/Service Bus) have exceeded the set value (50%), the percentage be- tive communities and to overcome situa- ning Methodology, adopted on 31 January Housing Communities...), interoperability ing on the rise compared to the 2018 measurement (70%). The databases of 8 tions in which local self-governments do 2019 and 7 February 2019 respectively.15 IT of registers (such as linking the residence SABs (with 27 data sets / official records) were on the Service Bus (MPALSG, not have sufficient capacity to perform cer- systems, additional tools, manuals, forms register and the business register with the MoJ, MoI, NEA, TA, RGA, PDI Fund and CROSO). Moreover, 329 different insti- tain primary or delegated tasks (e.g. natu- and checklists are being prepared for an ef- spatial units register and the address reg- tutions exchanged data from official records through the e-ZUP system (SABs ral disasters, emergencies, environmental fective application of the Serbian Planning ister) in order to achieve full electronic ex- with outposts, social work centres, higher education institutions, etc.). 80% of issues, etc.).12 System Law and related bylaws: change of data from official records and to the data contained in the record of citizens of the Republic of Serbia was con- provide services to citizens and business- The inter-sectoral UIS became function- verted into electronic form and transferred to the MoI’s Central Data Processing es more efficiently. al in 2019 in terms of public policy docu- and Storing system, as had been planned for 2019. ment planning and reporting and opera-
14 News release on the MPALSG website accessed on 13 February 2020: http://mduls.gov.rs/obavestenja/jedinstveni-popis-poslova-na-loklanom-nivou-vlasti/ and the Single Inventory of tasks performed at the local government level: http://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/Copy-of-Jedinstveni-popis-poslova.pdf 11 The Public Administration Reform Strategy, p. 14: http://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/Strategija-reforme-javne-uprave-u-Srbiji-preciscen-tekst.pdf 15 Both Decrees were published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 8/19 of 8 February 2019 and entered into force on 16 February 2019. 12 Brochure Through inter-municipal cooperation to better services for citizens and businesses, MPALSG website accessed on 13 February 2020: 16 Handbook for Managers in SABs on How to Apply the Planning System Law – Towards Better Decisions, PPS website: http://mduls.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/brosura-medjuopstinska-saradanja.pdf https://rsjp.gov.rs/EN/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Priru%C4%8Dnik-za-rukovodioce-.pdf 13 News release on the MPALSG website accessed on 13 February 2020: http://mduls.gov.rs/saopstenja/prva-medjuopstinska-partnerstva-u-srbiji/ 17 General Training Programme for Employees of LSGUs, NAPA website: https://www.napa.gov.rs/tekst/50/opsti-program-obuke-zaposlenih-u-jls.php
16 17 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020 Objective 1 PAR AP Annual Report | 2018-2020
THE MAJORITY OF APPLICATIONS WERE FILED THROUGH THE E-GOVERN- MENT PORTAL AND ITS SUBSYSTEMS FOR THE FOLLOWING SERVICES Legal prerequisites for establishing and deployed by 41 real estate cadastre offic- MoI and the BRA use the services of the maintaining the Central Population Regis- es. The software for the spatial units reg- spatial units register and of the address ter were ensured in 2019: the Law on the ister and the address register will be com- register. No. of applications No. of applications Service Central Population Register18 was adopted pleted by the end of February 2020. The in 2018 in 2019 in March, whereas in September a bylaw was passed necessary for its implementa- Making an appointment for services tion – Decree on the manner of acquiring, 347 150 Ten years after being launched the new e-Government Portal is now available – Medicines and Med-ical Devices Agency of Serbia exchanging, accessing and protecting data to Serbian citizens with new design and functionalities. Its content is optimised contained in the Central Population Regis- Making an appointment for e-certificate – MoI for mobile phones and tablets and can be found at the old euprava.gov.rs ad- 2,436 3,876 ter – including other technical issues rele- dress currently having over 977,00021 users. For the first time in Serbia e-iden- vant to keeping the Central Population Reg- Making an appointment for ID card and passport – MoI 143,376 304,531 tification which uses mobile phones has been introduced in the e-Government ister.19 The Central Population Register is system (two-factor authentication). This is more than an important step in the expected to become operational from 1 Making an appointment at the police station for vehicle registration* – MoI 11,073 4,391 development of e-Government which enables further development of m-Gov- September 2020. 000 ernment in Serbia. As of 2019, new services are available on the e-Government Renewal of vehicle registration at authorised technical inspection sites 769,070 603,313 22 The spatial units register and the address Portal, such as ’issuing the2 00 certificate of (non)-conviction’. register are being improved and interop- 2 2 Application for issuing the health card or for replace-ment of the health booklet 2000 2,318 972 erability is being established with other with the health card – National Health Insurance Fund registers such as the residence register The module for e-payment of administra1 00 - cal Tax Administrations’ Portal, and the Application for making an entry to the Registry of Publicly-Owned Immovable and business register: the Law on Spatial 20,130 14,593 tive fees using payment cards and the iPay Ministry of Justice Portal of the Register of Property – National Property Directorate Units Register and the Address Register 1000 option is currently available across three IT Unpaid Fines. The number of transactions was drafted in 2019 and adopted in early systems: the e-Government Portal, the Lo- was on the rise: e-Kindergarten – Electronic enrolment of a child in a pre-school institution 12,408 13,305 202020. The address register software is 00 8 0 e-Baby – Registration of a newborn baby at maternity hospi-tals 62,110 63,304 201 2018 2019 Parental allowance application (application is made upon registration of a newborn 20,947 53,499 E-payments: No. of transactions E-payments: Amount (RSD) baby at maternity hospitals via the e-Baby service)