Juntendo Medical Journal 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Juntendo Medical Journal 2017 Special Reviews Juntendo Medical Journal 2017. 63(1), 2-7 A New Immunotherapy Using Regulatory T-Cells for High-Risk Corneal Transplantation TAKENORI INOMATA* *Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Corneal transplantation is the most commonly performed tissue transplantation worldwide. Despite very high (above 90%) survival rates in recipients with nonvascularized and noninflamed graft beds, survival rates significantly decline (under 50%) when grafts are placed onto vascularized or inflamed host beds associated with conditions such as previous graft rejection, infection, or trauma. These results are seen despite treatment with high doses of nonspecific immunosuppressive medications, which often do not promote long-term survival. Therefore, new strategies are required to modulate the immune system without conventional immunosuppressive agents and improve transplant survival in“high-risk”patients with inflamed host beds. Regulatory T-cells (Treg) are key modulators of the immune response and may play a crucial role in a new therapy for high-risk corneal transplantation. Here we introduce the murine high-risk corneal transplantation model and review the implications of Tregs for corneal transplantation. Key words: corneal transplantation, regulatory T-cell, high-risk corneal transplantation, neovascularization Introduction eyeʼs refractive power. The cornea has three layers, including the epithelium, stroma and endothelium, 1. Outline of corneal transplantation divided by Bowmanʼs membrane and Descemetʼs The first corneal transplantation was successfully membrane respectively. Corneal transplantation is performed by Dr. Eduard Zirm in 1905 1). Along with a surgical procedure where a damaged or diseased the growing demand for corneal transplantation, the cornea is replaced by donated corneal tissue. first institutional eye bank was born in New York in Corneal transplantation has evolved into an array of 1944. In Japan, the first eye bank was established by techniques focused on the selective replacement of Juntendo University School of Medicine and Keio diseased layers of the cornea such as lamellar University in 1963. Nowadays, cornea transplanta- corneal transplantation, Descemet stripping auto- tion is one of the most frequently performed solid mated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and organ transplantation worldwide with 65,000 cases penetrating keratoplasty. These procedures are annually. There are more than 40,000 cases in the tailored specifically to the underlying pathologic US and 1,500 cases in Japan annually 2). condition causing the corneal dysfunction. How- The cornea is the transparent, dome shaped layer ever, the majority of corneal transplantations are that covers the anterior eye and has the dual still penetrating keratoplasties 3). function of protecting the inner contents of the eye In uninflamed low-risk host beds (e. g. simple as well as providing approximately two thirds of the corneal scars), corneal transplants enjoy very high Takenori Inomata Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8431, Japan TEL: +81-3-5802-1228 FAX: +81-3-5689-0394 E-mail: [email protected] 339th Triannual Meeting of the Juntendo Medical Society: Medical Research Update〔Held on May 21, 2016〕 〔Received Nov. 25, 2016〕 Copyright © 2017 The Juntendo Medical Society. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution Li- cense (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original source is properly credited. doi: 10.14789/jmj.63.2 2 Juntendo Medical Journal 63(1), 2017 rates of success (above 90%). However, host factors corneal transplantation is able to track the behavior such as graft bed inflammation and neovasculariza- and contribution of donor and host-derived cells tion lead to high rejection rates (over 50%) even during an immune response with different allograft with the use of topical steroids. These results are types from different strains of mice as well as in seen despite treatment with high doses of nonspe- mice that lack (knockout) or overexpress (trans- cific immunosuppressive medications, which often genic) specific genes. do not promote long-term survival and may have We have developed a murine corneal transplanta- severe side effects such as glaucoma, cataracts, and tion model 7). Briefly, the central cornea (2-mm opportunistic infections 4) 5). diameter) was excised from a donor C57BL/6 In all forms of transplantation, certain hosts are mouse using scissors (Vannas; Storz Instruments, known to be at particularly high risk for graft rejec- San Dimas, CA). The graft bed was prepared by tion. High-risk transplant recipients often abruptly excising a 1.5-mm site in the central cornea of a and irreversibly reject their grafts regardless of the BALB/c mouse. The donor button was then placed magnitude of immunosuppression. Thus, under- onto the recipient bed and secured with eight standing the underlying mechanisms of high interrupted 11-0 nylon sutures. Corneal sutures rejection rates in high-risk corneal transportation is were removed 7 days after surgery. Graft survival essential for controlling the transplant immune was evaluated for 8 weeks using a slit-lamp response. biomicroscope. We used a standard opacity-grad- ing (range, 0-5+) scheme to define rejection 8); 2. Immune privilege of cornea corneas with an opacity score of 2+ for two consec- Immune privilege is well developed in the eye, utive examinations were considered rejected. brain, pregnant uterus, testis, ovary adrenal cortex and certain solid tumors 6). It protects against Analysis of neovascularization post high-risk collateral damage from immune-mediated inflam- corneal transplantation mation. In the eye, the cornea, anterior chamber, vitreous cavity and subretinal space are considered 1. Murine high-risk corneal transplantation model to be immune-privileged sites. Immune privilege is For understanding the underlying mechanisms of defined as the reduced incidence and activity of high rejection rate in high-risk corneal transplanta- immune rejection in corneal allografts compared to tion, we also developed a murine high-risk corneal other categories of organ allografts performed transplantation model 7). Inflamed, neovascularized under the same conditions. Skin allografts trans- (ʻhigh-riskʼ) host beds were created using three planted across various MHC or minor histocompati- intrastromal sutures placement into the central bility barriers undergo rejection in approximately cornea using 11-0 nylon sutures 14 days before 100% of the hosts. By contrast, orthotopic corneal corneal transplantation to induce host beds prone to allografts experience longer-term survival in 50% graft rejection. For confirming the neovasculariza- to 90% of the hosts, depending on the histocompati- tion and lymphoangiogenessis in the cornea, we bility barriers that confront the host. The capacity developed original software using ImageJ 9) 10). Our of corneal allografts to evade immune rejection is software calculates the areas of neovascularization attributable to multiple anatomical, physiological (Figure-1A; CD31) and lymphoangiogenessis and immunoregulatory conditions that act to pre- (Figure-1B; LYVE-1) after immunofluorescent vent the induction and expression of alloimmunity. staining as the percentage of vessels (as outlined in white, Figure-1C and D) growing into the cornea. Murine model of corneal transplantation We have confirmed significantly high neovasculari- zation and lymphoangiogenessis in high-risk host Corneal transplantation in the murine model is an beds 14 days after suture placement 10). Then, we excellent model for researching cornea and ocular excised a 1.5 mm corneal button from the high-risk surface immunology. The accessibility of the cornea host beds and performed the corneal transplanta- enables ease of manipulation and observation of tion with 2.0 mm donor corneas via 8 sutures using graft survival. In addition, the murine model of 11-0 nylon suture. 3 Inomata: Treg therapy to corneal transplantation CD31 LYVE-1 AB IHC CD Result Figure-1 Representative image showing (A) CD31 (blood vessels), (B) LYVE-1 (lymphatic vessels) staining of the cornea and (C & D) the processed image (calculated area) using ImageJ. (magnification, ×4). 2. Corneal whole mount and immunofluorescent area (%) by ImageJ). staining Freshly excised corneas were washed in phos- Regulatory T-cell therapy for corneal phate-buffered saline. Corneal epithelium was transplantation removed after incubation with 20 mM EDTA for 60 minutes in 37℃; fixed in acetone for 15 minutes at Regulatory T-cells (Tregs) were discovered by room temperature, and blocked in 2% bovine serum Shimon Sakauguchi in 1995. Tregs maintain albumin for 60 minutes. Then, the corneas were immune homeostasis by dampening inflammatory double stained with CD31 (Santa Cruz Biotechnol- responses toward self- and alloantigens 11) 12), ogy, Dallas, TX, USA) and lymphatic vessel thereby playing a crucial role in allograft survival. endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE)-1 (R&D Studies in solid organ transplantation have shown AF2125) as previously described using goat anti- that Treg-based therapies can be effective in mouse CD31 FITC (1:100) and LYVE-1 purified promoting long-term tolerance to skin and heart goat-anti mouse (1:400) overnight. Cy3 conjugated grafts in experimental animals 13) 14) as well as donkey anti-goat
Recommended publications
  • Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation Global Challenges
    E. K. Massey, F. Ambagtsheer, W. Weimar (Eds.) Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation Global Challenges PABST E. K. Massey, F. Ambagtsheer, W. Weimar (Eds.) Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects of Transplantation Global Challenges PABST SCIENCE PUBLISHERS Lengerich Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available in the Internet at <http://dnb.ddb.de>. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the mate- rial is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in data banks. The use of registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a spe- cific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The authors and the publisher of this volume have taken care that the information and recommen- dations contained herein are accurate and compatible with the standards generally accepted at the time of publication. Nevertheless, it is difficult to ensure that all the information given is entirely accurate for all circumstances. The publisher disclaims any liability, loss, or damage incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any of the contents of this volume. © 2017 Pabst Science Publishers · D-49525 Lengerich Internet: www.pabst-publishers.de, www.pabst-science-publishers.com E-mail: [email protected] Print: ISBN 978-3-95853-292-2 eBook: ISBN 978-3-95853-293-9 (www.ciando.com) Formatting: µ Printed in Germany by KM-Druck, D-64823 Gross-Umstadt Contents Preface Introduction Emma K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Issues in Living-Related Corneal Tissue Transplantation
    Viewpoint Ethical issues in living-related corneal J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2018-105146 on 23 May 2019. Downloaded from tissue transplantation Joséphine Behaegel, 1,2 Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill,1,2 Heather Draper3 1Department of Ophthalmology, ABSTRact injury, typically chemical burns, chronic inflamma- Antwerp University Hospital, The cornea was the first human solid tissue to be tion and certain genetic diseases, the limbal stem Edegem, Belgium 2 transplanted successfully, and is now a common cells may be lost and the cornea becomes vascula- Faculty of Medicine and 5 6 Health Sciences, Dept of procedure in ophthalmic surgery. The grafts come from rised and opaque, leading to blindness (figure 1). Ophthalmology, Visual Optics deceased donors. Corneal therapies are now being In such cases, standard corneal transplants fail and Visual Rehabilitation, developed that rely on tissue from living-related donors. because of the inability to maintain a healthy epithe- University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, This presents new ethical challenges for ophthalmic lium. Limbal stem cell transplantation is designed to Belgium 3Division of Health Sciences, surgeons, who have hitherto been somewhat insulated address this problem by replacing the damaged or Warwick Medical School, from debates in transplantation and donation ethics. lost limbal stem cells (LSC) and restoring the ocular University of Warwick, Coventry, This paper provides the first overview of the ethical surface, which in turn increases the success rates of United Kingdom considerations generated by ocular tissue donation subsequent sight-restoring corneal transplants.7 8 from living donors and suggests how these might Limbal stem cell donations only entail the removal Correspondence to be addressed in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Corneal Transplantation Published: 2017.12.15
    ORIGINAL PAPER e-ISSN 2329-0358 © Ann Transplant, 2017; 22: 749-754 DOI: 10.12659/AOT.905498 Received: 2017.05.25 Accepted: 2017.07.19 The Evolution of Corneal Transplantation Published: 2017.12.15 Authors’ Contribution: ABCDEF 1 Tobias Röck 1 Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany Study Design A DEF 1 Johanna Landenberger 2 Department of General Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany Data Collection B Statistical Analysis C CDEF 2 Matthias Bramkamp Data Interpretation D ACDEF 1 Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt Manuscript Preparation E ABCDEF 1 Daniel Röck Literature Search F Funds Collection G Corresponding Author: Tobias Röck, e-mail: [email protected] Source of support: Departmental sources Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the evolution of surgical methods in and leading indications for cor- neal transplantation from 2005 to 2016. Material/Methods: Data from the corneal graft waiting list and from all keratoplasties carried out between 2005 and 2016 at the University Eye Hospital Tübingen were retrospectively evaluated. Results: A total of 1259 keratoplasties were performed between 2005 and 2016 at the University Eye Hospital Tübingen. The most common surgical indications for corneal transplantation were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (45.5%) and keratoconus (14.2%). The mean rate of corneal transplantations almost doubled from 71 kerato- plasties per year in the first 6-year period to 139 keratoplasties per year in the second 6-year period (P=0.005). The number of penetrating keratoplasties remained similar. The number of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasties (DMEK) increased significantly from 2008 to 2016 (P<0.0001).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 211111
    Corneal transplantation; developments 2.6 Corneal transplantation; developments Corneal transplants are aimed to improve vision or to relieve pain. Other benefits for patients include saving the eyeball in case of a corneal perforation or improving the cosmetic aspect of the eye. The evolution of corneal transplantation has had an impact on 2.6 eye banking, the processing and selection of donor tissue. International developments Despite attempts since the early 1800s285,286 it was not until the beginning of the 20th century that success in corneal transplantation came in sight. In December 1905, in the former Moravia now Czech Republic, the first successful human corneal transplant was performed by Dr Eduard Zirm on a 45 year old farm hand. The patient suffered from lime burns and both corneas were severally scarred in the centre. At present this patient would be considered a poor candidate for corneal transplantation.75,76 His preoperative visual acuity was hand movements in both eyes. The donor was an 11 year old boy. He lost vision following an intraocular metallic foreign body injury. Zirm enucleated the blind eye and used its clear cornea for two 5.0 mm buttons. He removed the tissue with a von Hippel trephine, developed in 1888. Zirm kept the transplants in place with a bridge of conjunctiva sutured over the corneas. One of the grafts failed, the other cleared and 15 weeks after surgery the patient was sent home. A year later an ophthalmologist checking the patient’s visual acuity found it to be 6/36 with a stenopeic disc. The patient lived for 3 years after surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Laryngeal Transplantation Report
    The Royal College of Surgeons of England Laryngeal transplantation Laryngeal transplantation WORKING PArtY FINAL REPOrt June 2011 External Affairs [email protected] Published by The Royal College of Surgeons of England 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields London WC2A 3PE www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/docs The Royal College of Surgeons of England © 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, no guarantee can be given that all errors and omissions have been excluded. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Registered charity no. 212808 The cover image of this document is taken from the India proofs of the first edition of Gray’s Anatomy, held in the College archives. Table of contents Foreword 3 Executive summary 3 1 Background 4 2 Laryngeal transplantation 5 Which parts need to be transplanted? 6 Blood supply 6 Nerve supply 6 Functional outcomes of laryngeal transplantation 6 Breathing 6 Swallowing 6 Voice and speech quality 6 Alternative techniques for voice restoration 7 Previous laryngeal transplantations 7 Key references and further reading 7
    [Show full text]