78 Camp David Summit and Jabotinsky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

78 Camp David Summit and Jabotinsky Books on ’78 Camp David Summit and Jabotinsky Independent scholar and “Self-Hating Gentile” blogger Thomas G. Mitchell, Ph.D., has provided us with the following review article: Jabotinsky: the Forgotten Zionist Thirteen Days in September: Carter, Begin, and Sadat at Camp David by Lawrence Wright, Alfred Knopf, 368 pages, Hardcover $18.98, Paperback $12.60; Jabotinsky by Hillel Halkin, Yale University Press, 246 pages, $25. Last year, former Carter administration communications director Jerry Rafshoon commissioned journalist Lawrence Wright (author of previous books on Al Qaeda and Scientology) to write a play about the Camp David Summit of 1978. The resulting work received rave reviews with “The Waltons” TV series star, Richard Thomas, playing the role of Jimmy Carter. Wright became so immersed in the subject that he was not content merely writing a play. He went on to write Thirteen Days in September about the summit, also to favorable reviews. This was the last time that Washington successfully mediated a peace settlement in the Middle East between Arabs and Israel. Each day of the summit receives its own chapter. Wright bounces back & forth in time to tell the back stories of the main participants, which several reviewers at the Amazon site found distracting. From my reading, it seems written with drama rather than analysis being its main purpose. For those who desire a more detailed analysis of the Arab-Israeli peacemaking policy of the Carter administration and the reasons for its success, I recommend two previous books written on the subject. In 1981, former Carter administration National Security Council Middle East staffer William Quandt published Camp David, a lengthy account of the Carter administration’s Arab-Israeli policy from 1977 to 1980. It is short on drama, but long on narrative. Also on the subject is University of Maryland Professor Shibley Telhami’s Power and Leadership in International Bargaining, which uses realist theory to explain why both Egypt and Israel made the bargain that they did at Camp David and later in Cairo and Jerusalem in 1979. The connecting thread between accounts of Camp David in 1978 and Hillel Halkin’s book on Jabotinsky is the personage of Menachem Begin. Anyone who has read a biography of Begin, the first Israeli prime minister from the Right, is familiar with the name of Vladimir “Ze’ev” Jabotinsky. Jabotinsky was an early Zionist leader, a generation younger than the founders of political Zionism, Theodor Herzl and Max Nordau. Like Herzl and Nordau, Jabotinsky was a talented journalist and literary figure who gave up a future career in belles lettres for a “career” as a Zionist leader. Until now, those interested in Jabotinsky have had a choice between very lengthy and expensive multi-volume biographies by Joseph Schechtman, a former close aide, and Shmuel Katz, a former Begin associate who split with him over Camp David, or the official interpretation of Jabotinsky that one finds in Begin biographies or in analyses of his thought written by Revisionist Zionists. Yale University Press wisely chose a leading Israeli translator of Hebrew and Yiddish literature into English to write the first short single- volume biography of Jabotinsky. Jabotinsky’s main importance to those interested in Israeli politics today is that he is the originator of the ideology of the Israeli secular Right—Revisionist Zionism—as well as its main structures: the Revisionist Party, Betar youth movement, and the Irgun Zvai Leumi paramilitary organization. Jabotinsky spent the 1920s putting these institutions together and working out the ideology of the movement. He then spent his final decade, from 1930 to August 1940, trying unsuccessfully to mediate disagreements among these institutions while trying to save European Jewry from the coming Holocaust. He did this all with a weak popular base in Palestine and in America. He led the movement first from Paris and then London while traveling across Europe by train, spending most of his time in Poland and the Baltic states. The one impression that I was left with after reading Halkin’s conclusion was of a magnificent waste of literary talent sacrificed to the service of an impossible mission. But why bother with the biography of a figure who was a failure? Until recently Jabotinsky’s ideology in Herut (Begin’s original Revisionist party) and the Likud had been filtered through Menahem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir. Nearly all the Revisionist “princes” (as second-generation Revisionist leaders are known) were sons or daughters (in the case of Tzipi Livni) of members of the Etzel and Lehi paramilitary groups. But the most successful prince of all, Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu, is the son of a close Jabotinsky aide who was shunned by Begin because he spent the 1940s in America organizing the Jewish Right rather than fighting the British occupation in Palestine. Since Netanyahu’s ideology comes from Jabotinsky through his father, those interested in understanding Netanyahu should read not only a summary of Jabotinsky’s Revisionist Zionist ideology, but an account of Revisionist foreign policy and diplomacy as practiced by Jabotinsky during the desperate 1930s. For the casual reader, this book fills a big gap in the literature. Those who want to read more after reading Halkin’s biography should turn to Colin Shindler’s The Triumph of Military Zionism (2009), which tells the story of the changing of the guard from Jabotinsky to the paramilitary organizations in the late 1930s. .
Recommended publications
  • Memorandum of Conversation Between Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and US President Jimmy Carter (19 July 1977)
    1 Memorandum of Conversation between Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and US President Jimmy Carter (19 July 1977) National Security Affairs, Staff Material, Middle East File, Subject File, Box 66, Middle East: Peace Negotiations 1977 Volume I. The Jimmy Carter Presidential Library, Atlanta GA. November 16, 2017 Prime Minister Menachem Begin and President Jimmy Carter meet at the White House. Ya’acov Sa’ar / Israel National Photos In May 1977, Menachem Begin was unexpectedly elected Israel’s Seventh Prime Minister. Since the US was Israel’s most important ally, it was custom for every Israeli Prime Minister to meet the American president as early as possible after new elections. As his predecessor Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin had done two months earlier, Begin made immediate plans to meet President Carter. In preparing for his Washington visit, Begin read the protocols of the tough Rabin-Carter encounters in March. Carter had already denied Israel weapons promised by his predecessor, Gerald Ford, and was the first president to publically promote a Palestinian homeland. Begin had also heard about Carter’s declarations regarding Israeli withdrawal from most of the territories Israel had captured in the defensive war of June 1967. Begin fervently believed that the West Bank was an integral part of the Jewish homeland, and consequently opposed any foreign sovereignty over the territory. Begin had no such emotional feeling for the Sinai Peninsula. At this preliminary meeting, Begin sought to establish a positive rapport with Carter and gave Carter a negotiating plan to focus on Sinai. As for Carter, he insisted on a comprehensive negotiating format that required Israel to negotiate with all Arab states and the PLO.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel-Pakistan Relations Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies (JCSS)
    P. R. Kumaraswamy Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies (JCSS) The purpose of the Jaffee Center is, first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel's national security as well as Middle East regional and international secu- rity affairs. The Center also aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are - or should be - at the top of Israel's national security agenda. The Jaffee Center seeks to address the strategic community in Israel and abroad, Israeli policymakers and opinion-makers and the general public. The Center relates to the concept of strategy in its broadest meaning, namely the complex of processes involved in the identification, mobili- zation and application of resources in peace and war, in order to solidify and strengthen national and international security. To Jasjit Singh with affection and gratitude P. R. Kumaraswamy Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations Memorandum no. 55, March 2000 Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies 6 P. R. Kumaraswamy Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel Tel. 972 3 640-9926 Fax 972 3 642-2404 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/ ISBN: 965-459-041-7 © 2000 All rights reserved Graphic Design: Michal Semo Printed by: Kedem Ltd., Tel Aviv Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations 7 Contents Introduction .......................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Zionist Right: Polish Jews and the Betar Youth Movement, 1922-1935
    THE RISE OF THE ZIONIST RIGHT: POLISH JEWS AND THE BETAR YOUTH MOVEMENT, 1922-1935 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Daniel K. Heller August 2012 © 2012 by Daniel Kupfert Heller. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/bd752jg9919 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Steven Zipperstein, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Norman Naimark I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Aron Rodrigue Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii ABSTRACT This dissertation charts the social, cultural and intellectual development of the Zionist Right through an examination of the Brit Yosef Trumpeldor youth movement, known eventually by its Hebrew acronym, Betar.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the EYE of the STORM Essays on Ze’Ev Jabotinsky This Annual Is Published with the Kind Assistance of Yad David Ben-Gurion IYUNIM BITKUMAT ISRAEL Thematic Series
    IYUNIM BITKUMAT ISRAEL IN THE EYE OF THE STORM Essays on Ze’ev Jabotinsky This annual is published with the kind assistance of Yad David Ben-Gurion IYUNIM BITKUMAT ISRAEL Thematic Series IN THE EYE OF THE STORM Essays on Ze’ev Jabotinsky Edited by Avi Bareli Pinhas Ginossar THE BEN-GURION INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF ISRAEL AND ZIONISM BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV PRESS HERZL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY OF ZIONISM HAIFA UNIVERSITY JABOTINSKY INSTITUTE IN ISRAEL TEL AVIV MENACHEM BEGIN HERITAGE INSTITUTE JERUSALEM 2004 Editorial Board: Yosef Achimeir, Avi Bareli, Pinhas Ginossar, Shalom Ratzabi, Yechiam Weitz Editorial Assistant: Orna Miller Advisory Board: Meir Avizohar, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Menahem Brinker, Hebrew University; Itamar Even-Zohar, Tel Aviv University; Jonathan Frankel, Hebrew University; Tuvia Friling, Ben-Gurion Institute; Allon Gal, Ben-Gurion Institute; Pinhas Ginossar, Ben-Gurion Institute; Moshe Lissak, Hebrew University; Matityahu Mintz, Tel Aviv University; Israel Oppenheim, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Benjamin Pinkus, Ben-Gurion Institute; Zaki Shalom, Ben-Gurion Institute; Moshe Shemesh, Ben-Gurion Institute; S. Ilan Troen, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Style Editing: Smadar Rothmann, Ravit Delouya, Alon Eshpar, Yael Eyal Type Editing: Smadar Rothmann English Abstracts: Shulamit Amir-Zarmi Cover Design: Ruthie Beth-Or Production Manager: Shaul Shragai ISSN 0792-7169 Statements of fact or opinion appearing in this volume are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement
    [Show full text]
  • November 5, 2004 END of the IDEOLOGY an Interview with Shmuel Katz Newspaper: Makor Rishon Interviewer: Roni Hadar Translation
    November 5, 2004 END OF THE IDEOLOGY An Interview with Shmuel Katz Newspaper: Makor Rishon Interviewer: Roni Hadar Translation: Dr. Erich Isaac This past political week provided striking background for an interview with Shmuel Katz, member of the first Knesset for the Herut party, ideologist of the movement, writer, publicist and the author of the biography of Ze’ev Jabotinsky. From the television in his room at “Beit HaHorim” of WIZO in North Tel Aviv, the voice of Arik Sharon speaks from the platform of the Knesset on the day of the vote of the disengagement plan. He rests against the back of his chair, slowly wipes the lenses of his spectacles and states with a voice shaking with emotion: “An era is over. Today, the Likud has come to the end of its road. The end of the era of those who continue the path of Jabotinsky. Somebody should climb the stairs in ‘Metzudat Ze’ev’ [Likud headquarters] and remove the picture of the Founding Father. To remove it as well from all the offices of the ministers and the office of the prime minister. Until the day that somebody worthy to be called the heir and follower of his way. From now on, there is no tie whatsoever between Ze’ev Jabotinsky and what Arik made from the Likud.” Next month, he will be 90 years old. Health, he says, is reasonably good for his age. “Physical pains don’t bother me now. I suffer from the end of the road for Jabotinsky’s doctrines. They must now split.
    [Show full text]
  • The a to Z of Zionism by Rafael Medoff and Chaim I
    OTHER A TO Z GUIDES FROM THE SCARECROW PRESS, INC. 1. The A to Z of Buddhism by Charles S. Prebish, 2001. 2. The A to Z of Catholicism by William J. Collinge, 2001. 3. The A to Z of Hinduism by Bruce M. Sullivan, 2001. 4. The A to Z of Islam by Ludwig W. Adamec, 2002. 5. The A to Z of Slavery & Abolition by Martin A. Klein, 2002. 6. Terrorism: Assassins to Zealots by Sean Kendall Anderson and Stephen Sloan, 2003. 7. The A to Z of the Korean War by Paul M. Edwards, 2005. 8. The A to Z of the Cold War by Joseph Smith and Simon Davis, 2005. 9. The A to Z of the Vietnam War by Edwin E. Moise, 2005. 10. The A to Z of Science Fiction Literature by Brian Stableford, 2005. 11. The A to Z of the Holocaust by Jack R. Fischel, 2005. 12. The A to Z of Washington, D.C. by Robert Benedetto, Jane Dono- van, and Kathleen DuVall, 2005. 13. The A to Z of Taoism by Julian F. Pas, 2006. 14. The A to Z of the Renaissance by Charles G. Nauert, 2006. 15. The A to Z of Shinto by Stuart D. B. Picken, 2006. 16. The A to Z of Byzantium by John H. Rosser, 2006. 17. The A to Z of the Civil War by Terry L. Jones, 2006. 18. The A to Z of the Friends (Quakers) by Margery Post Abbott, Mary Ellen Chijioke, Pink Dandelion, and John William Oliver Jr., 2006 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisionist Zionism in America: the Ac Mpaign to Win American Public Support, 1939-1948 Joanna Maura Saidel University of New Hampshire, Durham
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Winter 1994 Revisionist Zionism in America: The ac mpaign to win American public support, 1939-1948 Joanna Maura Saidel University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Saidel, Joanna Maura, "Revisionist Zionism in America: The campaign to win American public support, 1939-1948" (1994). Doctoral Dissertations. 1824. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/1824 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter free, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely afreet reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • THESIS- THIRD Format Corrections Completed
    ABSTRACT Policing Palestine: British Security Strategy in Palestine, 1917-1947 Robert B. DeBoard, M.A. Mentor: George W. Gawrych, Ph.D. Throughout the British Mandate for Palestine, the British Government attempted to establish a policy that reconciled the dueling aspirations of Palestine’s Arab and Jewish communities. This thesis examines British security operations to suppress the Arab Revolt of 1936, Jewish terrorism during World War II, and the post-war United Resistance Movement. This study contends that the British adopted a colonial policing model that stressed the security forces’ reliance on native support in order to suppress active threats to peace. Second, it demonstrates that shifting British policy led to the alienation of the Jewish community, which had provided important support in suppressing the Arab Revolt. As Jewish intelligence sources dried up, the British were increasingly unable to counter violence coming from the Jewish Underground. This thesis adds to the historiography of the Mandate by demonstrating the complex relationship between British colonial policy, security strategy, and Arab and Jewish national interests. Copyright © 2013 by Robert B. DeBoard All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................... iii Dedication .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Irgun Zvai Leumi: from Terrorists to Politicians
    The Irgun Zvai Leumi: From Terrorists to Politicians Brandon Sellers PSCI 362 The Irgun Zvai Leumi (National Military tine; a reestablishment of the Jewish regiments; Organization) was a Jewish terrorist organization and military training for youth” (Jewish Virtual that transitioned from a terrorist group to a politi- Library). Essentially, they wanted to create a cal party. As a movement the group was founded Jewish state. This broad goal was largely ful- in 1931 under Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s leadership, but filled nine years later when “the national council even then their operations did not include vio- proclaimed the state of Israel on May 14th, 1948” lence against their enemies, the British or Arabs. (Henry 27). The end of World War II led the Not until 1939, when group leaders recognized United Nations to create the state of Israel and the need to start initiating violence, can the Irgun lay out a partition plan separating Muslims and really be called a terrorist organization. Jews. The source of the Irgun’s grievances can be As Alice Henry points out, war immediately found in the settlement of Israel. They were broke out the next day: “the Palestine war began. founded upon Jabotinsky’s doctrine of Revisionist Egypt invaded, Syrians and a few Lebanese Zionism, which included “relentless pressure on attacked from the north, Jordan from the east” Great Britain, including petitions and mass dem- (Henry 27). This last detail, including Muslims in onstrations, for Jewish statehood on both banks a partitioned region, did not satisfy the Irgun as of the Jordan River; a Jewish majority in Pales- described in a New York Times article printed just two months after the conflict began.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937-1967 Alexander Kaye Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Th
    The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937-1967 Alexander Kaye Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2012 Alexander Kaye All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937-1967 Alexander Kaye This dissertation is an attempt to recover abandoned pathways in religious Zionist thought. It identifies a fundamental shift in the legal philosophy of religious Zionists, demonstrating that around the time of the establishment of the State of Israel, religious Zionists developed a new way of thinking about the relationship between law and the state. Before this shift took place, religious Zionist thinkers affiliated with a variety of legal and constitutional philosophies. As shown in chapter 1, the leaders of the religious kibbutz movement advocated a revolutionary, almost anarchic, approach to law. They (in theory, at least,) only accepted rules that emerged spontaneously from the spirit of their religious and national life, even if that meant departing from traditional halakha. Others had a more positive attitude towards law but, as chapter 2 shows, differed widely regarding the role of halakha in the constitution of the Jewish state. They covered a spectrum from, at one extreme, the call for a complete separation between religion and state to, on the other, the call a rabbinic oversight of all legislation. They all, however, were legal pluralists; they agreed that a single polity may have within it a plurality of legitimate sources of legal authority and that, even in a Jewish state, other kinds of legislation may hold authority alongside halakha.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Pope
    $1.00 WWW.5TJT.COM VOL. 9 NO. 28 30 NISAN 5769 grumn-ghrz, APRIL 24, 2009 INSIDE FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK REMEMBERING THE SHOAH Always Another Story BY LARRY GORDON Hannah Reich Berman 26 MindBiz Is Israel Too Jewish? Esther Mann, LMSW 30 After decades of talking one Jewish and one Arab—and Our Aliyah Chronicle about negotiating peace, and throw away the keys. Shmuel Katz 34 15 years since the Oslo But not so fast. With the Accords, someone forgot to arrival of the Obama adminis- Back To Normal? ask what the character of the tration in Washington and P h o t Phyllis J. Lubin 40 o two states in the so-called two- with his government’s and B y I v a state solution is supposed to State Department’s natural n H . R’ Yehoshua Hutner, a’h N o be. On the surface it seems tilt toward a smaller and vast- r m a Hillel Fendel 65 n like a nice and tidy solution to ly shrunken State of Israel, an otherwise impossible prob- the issue of whether or not The Five Towns communitywide observance of Holocaust Remembrance Day lem. Israelis and Palestinians Israel should be a Jewish state took place on Monday evening, April 20, at Congregation Beth Sholom in Lawrence. A moving ceremony featuring the lighting of six memorial candles seemingly cannot live together, has finally emerged. for the six million who perished in the Holocaust was held. Professor Yaffa so let’s separate them once and Eliach was the keynote speaker.
    [Show full text]
  • A HALF-CENTURY of DEFENDING ISRAEL and the JEWS by Moshe Phillips
    “SEATTLE’S JEREMIAH”: A HALF-CENTURY OF DEFENDING ISRAEL AND THE JEWS By Moshe Phillips [Moshe Phillips is national director of Herut North America’s U.S. division and a candidate on the Herut slate in the 2020 World Zionist Congress's US elections; Herut is an international movement for Zionist pride and education and is dedicated to the ideals of pre-World War Two Zionist leader Ze'ev Jabotinsky. Herut's website is https://www.voteherut2020.com/ ] His hometown newspaper calls him “Seattle’s Jeremiah.” An Israeli publication once hailed him as “Jewry’s premier polemicist.” After half a century fighting for Israel and the Jewish people in the trenches of the literary world, Edward Alexander is in yet another battle—as a candidate on the Herut list in the current U.S. elections for the World Zionist Congress. Alexander grew up in the heavily-Jewish Brownsville section of Brooklyn. The “most vivid and satisfying memory” of his childhood occurred in May 1948, when he was eleven years old. It involved Brooklyn Dodgers star Jackie Robinson, whom he and his boyhood pals regarded as “the greatest man in the world,” and David Ben-Gurion who was “a close second to Robinson in our esteem.” “These two heroic figures came together for me almost magically when I heard Robinson address a block party to celebrate Israel’s independence,” Alexander recalled. “I consider myself lucky,” he wrote, “never to have been disillusioned about what my parents taught me: that both men symbolized the belated righting of ancient historical wrongs, that Robinson was indeed a uniquely courageous figure and that the birth of Israel just a few years after the destruction of European Jewry was one of the greatest affirmations of life ever made by a martyred people…" After earning his bachelor’s degree in English literature at Columbia, Alexander completed his master’s and Ph.D.
    [Show full text]