Environmental Report for Mattawan Department of Public Works
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE IMPACT of STIGMA and DISCRIMINATION Against LGBT People in Michigan
RESEARCH THAT MATTERS THE IMPACT OF STIGMA AND DISCRIMINATION Against LGBT People in Michigan April 2019 Christy Mallory Taylor N.T. Brown Susan Freeman Brad Sears Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 DEMOGRAPHICS AND LEGAL LANDSCAPE .......................................................................................................... 10 DEMOGRAPHICS OF LGBT PEOPLE IN MICHIGAN ....................................................................................... 10 LGBT Adults in Michigan .......................................................................................................................... 10 LGBT Youth in Michigan ........................................................................................................................... 11 LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR LGBT PEOPLE IN MICHIGAN ................................................................................. 13 PUBLIC OPINION .............................................................................................................................................. 23 STIGMA AND DISCRIMINATION............................................................................................................................. 27 DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT: SURVEYS, COURT CASES, AND ANECDOTAL REPORTS ............. 27 Employment Discrimination and Harassment ..................................................................................... -
THE IMPACT of STIGMA and DISCRIMINATION Against LGBT People in Michigan
RESEARCH THAT MATTERS THE IMPACT OF STIGMA AND DISCRIMINATION Against LGBT People in Michigan April 2019 Christy Mallory Taylor N.T. Brown Susan Freeman Brad Sears TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 3 DEMOGRAPHICS AND LEGAL LANDSCAPE .......................................................................................................... 10 DEMOGRAPHICS OF LGBT PEOPLE IN MICHIGAN ....................................................................................... 10 LGBT Adults in Michigan .......................................................................................................................... 10 LGBT Youth in Michigan ........................................................................................................................... 12 LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR LGBT PEOPLE IN MICHIGAN ................................................................................. 13 PUBLIC OPINION .............................................................................................................................................. 23 STIGMA AND DISCRIMINATION............................................................................................................................. 27 DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT: SURVEYS, COURT CASES, AND ANECDOTAL REPORTS ............. 27 Employment Discrimination and Harassment ..................................................................................... -
School Proposals Fail by Big Margins Locally, Portage Sewer Rejected
w m P'pf "J^ T"»" ' • ' "' '*»' -•/^•wr 7^ m*mm-i 'tm1;^' ^.^:.^^ \^(> 10/1/(?0 t* "' r Jrk - Cl M [* fl; ' • * ^ p, 1 ' h " T ** V • 0 n < r U ••• r r i QUOTE 1 "Show me a man who Is a Ki)t:.>, ^T' ' AP !? good loser and I'U show you a man who is playing golf • !• !• !• .^. IB 1 •**•*" IB « 3& with his boss." 1ILUfJL \i. 1 || per copy —Nebraska Smoke-Eater vuuavu ONE HUNDRED-NINETEENTH YEAR—No. 25 CHELSEA, MICHIGAN, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER Ys, 1989 Plui 22 Pages This Week 2 5tfpplcm»nU School Proposals Fail By Big Margins Locally, Portage Sewer Rejected Chelsea and Dexter-area voters ported both measures while Chelsea and Putnam townships pledge their overwhelmingly voted against both School District endorsed B. credit behind bonds for the project, school finance reform proposals in a Unofficial area township voting failed 1,568 to 1,059. Dexter township special election last Tuesday, Nov. 7. results follow. residents rejected the proposal 675 to The measures failed by a wide PROPOSAL A 498. r^ margin state-wide. Dexter, yes-218, no-973; Freedom, Residents of the Sewer Assessment According to county election of yes-68, no-286; Lima, yes-80, no-512; District would have piad for the bonds ficials, the measures passed in nine of Lyndon, yes-81.no 387; Scio, yes-492, and each resident would have been 63 precincts in Ann Arbor and in one no-1,576; Shafbn, yes-53, no-289; assessed about $7,000 over 15 years. watd in the City of Ypsilanti, but Sylvan, yesA22«Uno-957; Webster, The proposed 19 mllion sewer system otherwise failed throughout the coun yes-132, no-553. -
Grosse Pointe
War Memorial loses court fight to expand to 40 Lakeshore By Chip Chipman rulmg on July 29 preventing Staff Writer dating back to 1941, should Bodman, Lee Wulfmler ill and The lakefront home the the War Memorial from ex- stand. injunction and on Feb. 14, said it's a prIvate matter be. panding to 40 Lakeshore, the his wIfe, Barbara Wulfmier, 1991, handed down a perma- Grosse Pointe War Memorial The restnction states that who live on Lakeshore north of tween the neIghbors," said War purchased three years ago for adjacent property to the north only a smgle famIly dwelling nent Injunction, ruling that the Memonal president Mark We- it purchased in May 1990. the property, filed a suit on War Memorial could not use $13 million cannot be used for shall eXISton the property and Nov. 28, 1990, Just two days af. ber "We'll have to look at a community center, the state be used for reSIdential purposes the house at 40 Lakeshore for what's best for the commumty, The court of appeals agreed ter the Farms city council ap. community activities. court of appeals ruled last only proved the rezonmg, citmg a but we haven't discussed any- WIth the cirCUIt court that al- The War Memonal appealed week. "Their (the plaintiffs) prop- violatIOn by the War Memonal thmg yet" though the Farms city council the illJuction on March 22, The War Memorial spent A unanimous decision by the erty rights have been upheld," of the 1941 deed restrlCtIOn had rezoned the property from 1991, and last Thursday the m. -
Domestic and Sexual Violence
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A number of institutions and people made a significant contribution to this project. We would first like to thank our key institutional co-sponsors who include the University of Michigan’s Center on Education of Women, Women’s Studies Department, and Institute on Women and Gender and the Women Lawyer’s Association of Michigan. The Michigan Women’s Foundation, Comerica Bank, and the University of Michigan Law School have provided generous funding and support. Those who wrote sections of this paper include: Deborah Labelle, Esq; Ellen Rabinowitz, Director, Washtenaw County Health Plan; Bob Gillette, Director, Legal Services of South Central Michigan; Dr. Sheryl Pimlott-Kubiak, Assistant Professor, Wayne State University; Lisa Ruby, Michigan Poverty Law Program; Anne Schroth, Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Michigan Clinical Law Program; Professor Rosemary Sarri, University of Michigan; Jean King, Esq; Mary Anne M. Helveston, Esq., Helveston & Helveston, P.C.; Tom Wilson, Initiator, Michigan Gender Equity Team; and Jay Kaplan of the ACLU of Michigan’s LGBT Project. Joanna Goddard, a New York University law student and ACLU legal intern, coordinated this effort. Other student interns who have worked on this project from its inception include Daniela Dover, Yale University; and Saveria Santoni, Wayne State University. Carmetta Jones, Jay Kaplan, Brenda Bove, Becky Bull, and Wendy Wagenheim provided invaluable staff support. ENDORSEMENTS Center for Civil Justice City of Ann Arbor Human Rights Office Latin Americans -
Michigan's Rural Health Profile
Michigan Rural Health Profile: A Report on the Health Trends and Resources of Rural Michigan 1990-2005 www.michigan.gov/ruralhealth Produced August 2008 Permission is granted for the reproduction of this publication provided that the reproductions contain appropriate reference to the source. Suggested citation: TL Wightman, IA Horste, E Speckman-Randall, LA Stratton, and LD Barnett. August 2008. Michigan Rural Health Profile: A Report on the Health Trends and Resources of Rural Michigan 1990-2005. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Community Health, Bureau of Health Policy, Planning, and Access, Health Planning and Access to Care Section. This project was financed in part through a grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Rural Health Policy. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. MDCH is an equal opportunity employer, services & program provider. Table of Contents Acknowledgements and Credits ii Executive Summary iii I. Introduction 1 II. Rural Definitions 2 III. State Characteristics 11 IV. Health Status 33 V. Health Resources 73 VI. Conclusion 94 Appendix A: Acronyms 95 Appendix B: List of Tables, Figures, and Maps 97 Michigan Rural Health Profile - i Acknowledgements and Credits The Health of Rural Michigan Profile Report was written as a contributing report for Michigan’s Strategic Opportunities for Rural Health Improvement 2008-2012 planning effort. Funding for this report came from the State Office of Rural Health Program which is funded by the Office of Rural Health Policy, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services.