DOCSLIB.ORG

METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS in TEE ANALYSIS of MCNOPOLGID MARKETS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS in TEE ANALYSIS of MCNOPOLGID MARKETS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN TEE ANALYSIS OF MCNOPOLGID MARKETS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University CHARLES EVERETT HELPPXE, B. S. ****** The Ohio State University 1959 Approved fcyt PREFACE There is a legend in econoadcs which says that economists should postpone until the twilight years of their active careers any efforts to deal comprehensively with the methodology of economics 9 The sub­ ject, so it is claimed, requires a long process of development with the discipline before the fruits of experience, of mature, reflective thought can be brought to bear on the demanding nature of the subject. Of course, some have started at early stages, witness Schumpeter’s first major work, but in general the study of methodology seems to take a strong ego, an impatience and deep concern with the accom­ plishments of a chosen field, or ignorance and naivete upon which age and experience have as yet left little of their stamp. Although the force of each partially explains the selection of the topic, only the reader can judge which force should be weighted more heavily. That this study has been"brought to a conclusion is the consequence of the encouragement and assistance of many persons. Several most, however, be singled out for special acknowledgment, Te Professor Clifford L* James, who encouraged me in this topic and closely followed its development, I offer ay warmest gratitude and deepest appreciation. Professors Robert D„ Patton and Alva M» Tuttle offered important assistance with concepts and form and made invaluable suggestions to improve the quality of the writing for which I am vezy grateful, Yet, I would not wish others to associate them with any errors that might be found in this study. This is the responsibility of the author, and, if the intellectual progeny should ii have strayed too far, that, too, would be a singular responsibility. Finally, to w wife who did far more than merely type copy, who experienced the distress of a dissertation in so many ways, I fondly dedicate this study* May 20, 1959 Charles S* Helppie ill CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 A* Recognition of methodology 2 B. The basic issue of methodology 5 C« Status of the issue 6 D. Direction of study 12 E® Summary and Conclusions 12 CHAPTER ZI GENERAL ELEMENTS OF METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 15 A* Dimensions of methodology 15 B* Bread issue of definition 16 C. Definition and meaning of methodology 17 D® Functions of methodology 19 So Approach or framework of methodology 23 1* The issue of the "best" approach or framework 25 2® Differences in approaches or frameworks 27 F® Methodological standards and tests 31 G. Attitudes and preconceptions > 33 1* Pure or discipline methodology 34 2® Sterile versus constructive methodology 3® H* A concept for methodology t methodological matrices 39 I* Summary and Conclusions 44 CHAPTER HI METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE* NCN-EOONCMIC 46 A® Scientific Weltanschauung and metaphysics 49 B® Methodological standards and rules 53 C« Added insights into methodology 61 1„ General theory or dualism 61 2* Mechanical models 63 3* Continuant versus occurrent conditions 65 4® Meaningless questions 66 D® Comparison of sciences 68 E® Social science methodology and a formal analysis 70 F® Summary and Conclusions 76 CHAPTER IV METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ECONOMICS 81 A® The attempt at compromise and synthesis 83 B® Emphasis on a logical system of economics 89 C. The stress of empiricism 94 D® Methodological Issues in policy orientation 99 E® The role of theory and facts 99 F. Prediction in economics 109 G® Summary and Conclusions 114 CHAPTER V THEGKT IN MONOPOLOID MARKET ANALYSIS 118 A® Abstraction in theory 118 1® Scope or magnitude of theory 120 2® Illustrative variations in scope 122 B, Theoretical concepts or models 125 iv CONTENTS 1* Equilibrium models 127 2» Power and bargaining models 133 3» Organic medals 135 4* Open-ended models 136 C. Theoretical topics and problems 139 D* Theoretical hypotheses and conclusions 142 E« Summary and Conclusions 143 CHAPTER TO EMPIRICAL WORK IN MONQPOLOID MARKET ANALYSIS 147 A. Empirical suspicions 14? B. Facts 151 C« Contr adlctory theses and methodological problems 152 1« Economic concentration 1.56 2. Merger movement and business cycles 159 3# "Turnover" of giant firms 160 4, Monopoly and misalleeatlon of resources 161 5« Rigid prices 163 6. Costs 166 7* Entry 167 D. Institutional approach 173 E« Summary and Conclusions 178 CHAPTER VII PUBLIC POLICY IN MCKOPOLOID MARKET ANALYSIS 181 A« Contradictions in public policy 181 B* A public policy perspective 183 C. General approaches to public policy 186 D. Pole of state action 191 E. Size and certainty in policy 193 F. Paradoxes of policy 195 G. Political environment and personal elements 200 H. Summary and Conclusions ' 203 CHAPTER V H I SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 207 BIBLIOGRAPHY 217 Chapter 1 Introduction Economists have expressed dissatisfaction with the quality ef the scientific performance of their discipline when asked to evaluate the theoretical and empirical findings it produces* This has been espe­ cially true in the analysis of monopolold markets where there is little room for sanguiness with the performance of economies when it is criticized fort (a) faulty theoretical formulations, (b) insuf­ ficient, conflicting, and inadequate evidence, and (e) absence of standards for evaluating this type of phenomena*^ In light of such criticism several conventional improvements and corrections are often advised* Concentration on the theoretical deficiency with a careful application of logical analysis to eliminate redundant and misleading propositions and unrealistic assumptions is mentioned* Also, the suggestion is advanced that extensive and elaborate empirical investigations would eliminate the inadequacies resulting from the paucity, or imperfections, of the data* Finally* there is the expectation that group meetings and interdisciplinary teams will provide the insights and programs for the construction of an adequate system of standards for policy* However, there may be an important reason for doubting the capacities of the conventional suggestions* Much of the effort 1 Corwin D* Edwards, "Issues in the Monopoly Problem", in teaagte 2S* £5* Their Regulation, edited by Edward H* Chamberlin, London: MacMillan and Company, Ltd*, 195^* PP» 188-200* *1# -2- expended along the conventional lines will be dissipated if the basic problems plaguing analysis are deeply imbedded in the corpus of economic science, i,e., if the problems are fundamentally method©- logical. Under these circumstances a different orientation would be necessary, one that would probe the foundations of analysis. Recognition of Methodology In the theory of monopoloid markets the influence of methodology has been duly recognized. Support has been given to the argument that a methodological reorientation is essential if such markets are to be analyzed successfully. Professor Triffin has made the point explicitly* “Something might he gained if we could approach the problem from a new angle and escape from the particular tradition and methodology within which the discussion has proceeded so far". Thus, on methodological grounds certain of the orthodox theoretical concepts are severely criticized.^ While explicit reference to methodology may be absent in theor­ etical works, the theorist alludes to issues of methodology. In his Theory ef Monopolistic Competition* Professor Chamberlin refers to a problem of methodological importance. This association of the theory of competition with facts which it does net fit has not only led to false conclusions about the facts; it has obscured the theory as well0 This 2Robert Triffin. Monopolistic Competition and Geperal Eguilibrium Theory. Cambridge) Harvard University Press, 19^0, p. 3, 3”ln the general theory of value, the group and industry are useless concepts. The new wine of monopolistic conpetltion should not be poured into the old goatskins of particular equilibrium methodology,” Ibid.. p. 89, -3- is the more serious because the mixture of the two is a chemical process and not merely a matter of addition. Slight elements of monopoly have a may of playing unexpected logical tricks* with results quite out of proportion to their seeming importance.** Similarly* Mrs* Robinson*s distinction between theory* practice* and evidence reflects a significant methodological position*^ The presence of methodology on the theoretical side of analysis Edward H. Chamberlin, Ifee Theory Monopolistic fifflESSiSifla* Fifth Edition* Cambridge: Harvard University Press* 19w , p0 3 * Another point of methodological interest appears in a comparison of his analysis with that of Joan Robinson: "It has been unfortunate that two theories as divergent in their interpretation of economic phenomena as Mrs. Robinson's and ny own should have become identified in the minds of so many* even to the point of regarding them as differing only im terminology.•••Gradually it dawned that the explanation lay in a difference* not merely of words* but of funda­ mental conception as to how the phenomena in question were to be explained." Ibid.. pp. vii-viii* 5 "The purpose of this book has been to provide a box of tools for the analytical economist* The area within which these tools can work is very narrowly bounded* A number of unsolved problems lie behind and before the problems with which they are adapted to deal* Behind lie the fundamental problems on whose solution depends the validity of the whole supply-and-demand-curve analysis* To these general questions the tools* in the nature of the case* can have no contribution to make* But even within their own sphere the tools can do no work unless they are given some material to work on* The imaginary examples of the shapes and movements of demand curves and cost curves* constructed in order to display the apparatus* serve to show the kind of results that the tools could produce if they were given some realistic material on which to exercise their ingenuity**** The level of abstraction maintained in this book is distressingly high.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Struggle to Redevelop a Jim Crow State, 1960–2000
    Educating for a New Economy: The Struggle to Redevelop a Jim Crow State, 1960–2000 by William D. Goldsmith Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Nancy MacLean, Supervisor ___________________________ Edward J. Balleisen ___________________________ Adriane Lentz-Smith ___________________________ Gary Gereffi ___________________________ Helen Ladd Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in The Graduate School of Duke University 2018 ABSTRACT Educating for a New Economy: The Struggle to Redevelop a Jim Crow State, 1960–2000 by William D. Goldsmith Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Nancy MacLean, Supervisor ___________________________ Edward J. Balleisen ___________________________ Adriane Lentz-Smith ___________________________ Gary Gereffi ___________________________ Helen Ladd An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 Copyright by William D. Goldsmith 2018 Abstract This dissertation shows how an array of policymakers, invested in uprooting an unequal political economy descended from the plantation system and Jim Crow, gravitated to education as a centerpiece of development strategy, and why so many are still disappointed in its outcomes. By looking at state-wide policymaking in North Carolina and policy effects in the state’s black belt counties, this study shows why the civil rights movement was vital for shifting state policy in former Jim Crow states towards greater investment in human resources. By breaking down employment barriers to African Americans and opening up the South to new people and ideas, the civil rights movement fostered a new climate for economic policymaking, and a new ecosystem of organizations flourished to promote equitable growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Rising Corporate Concentration, Declining Trade Union Power, and the Growing Income Gap: American Prosperity in Historical Perspective Jordan Brennan
    Rising Corporate Concentration, Declining Trade Union Power, and the Growing Income Gap: American Prosperity in Historical Perspective Jordan Brennan February 2016 Rising Corporate Concentration, Declining Trade Union Power, and the Growing Income Gap: American Prosperity in Historical Perspective Jordan Brennan* March 2016 *Jordan Brennan is an economist with Unifor, Canada’s largest private sector labor union, and a research associate of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. E-mail: [email protected]. Website: www.jordanbrennan.org. Contents Executive Summary 2 Acknowledgments 4 List of Figures 5 Part I: Corporate Concentration, Secular Stagnation, and the Growing Income Gap 6 Part II: Labor Unions, Inflation, and the Making of an Inclusive Prosperity 24 Appendix 48 References 51 1 Executive Summary The rise of income inequality amidst the deceleration of GDP growth must rank as two of the most perplexing and challenging problems in contemporary American capitalism. Comparing 1935–80 with 1980–2013—that is, the Keynesian-inspired welfare regime and, later, neoliberal globalization—the average annual rate of GDP growth was more than halved and income inequality went from a postwar low in 1976 to a postwar high in 2012. How do we account for this double-sided phenomenon? The conventional explanations of secular stagnation and elevated inequality are inadequate, largely because mainstream (“neoclassical”) economics rejects the notion that the amassment and exercise of institutional power play a role in the normal functioning of markets and business. This analytical inadequacy has left important causal elements outside the purview of researchers, policymakers, and the public at large. This two-part analysis investigates some of the causes and consequences of income inequality and secular stagnation in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dinner Tribute to Joseph A. Pechman
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu A Dinner Tribute to Joseph A. Pechman "In his generation of Washington intellectuals - the people who make a difference not because of their offices or their connections, but because of the force of their writing and their argument- none had more influence than Mr. Pechman. None used it with greater generosity or a surer sense of the public interest" I The Washington Post Wednesday, August 23, 1989 The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-2188 202/797-6220 Page 1 of 29 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu A Dinner Tribute to Joseph A. Pechman hosted by The Brookings Institution Tuesday, April 24, 1990 6:30 p.rn. The Hyatt Regency Hotel Capitol Hill 400 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. Washington District of Columbia Page 2 of 29 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu Joseph A. Pechman, one of America's most influential economists and leading theoretician on tax policy, was Director of the Economic Studies Program at The Brookings lnstitution for more than 20 years. At his death, he was Senior Fellow Emeritus in Economic Studies. Joe Pechman came to Brookings in 1960 after serving on the staff of the Council of Economic Advisers, the Committee for Economic Development, and the Office of Price Administration. As Director of Economic Studies from 1962 to 1983, he managed programs in the study of government finance and supervised research in social economics and regulatory policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory, Attention, and Choice
    Memory, Attention, and Choice Pedro Bordalo, Nicola Gennaioli, Andrei Shleifer1 Revised May 7, 2019 (original version 2015) Abstract. Building on the textbook description of associative memory (Kahana 2012), we present a model of choice in which options cue recall of similar past experiences. Recall shapes valuation and choice in two ways. First, recalled experiences form a norm, which serves as an initial anchor for valuation. Second, salient quality and price surprises relative to the norm lead to large adjustments in valuation. The model provides a unified account of many well documented choice puzzles including experience effects, projection and attribution biases, background contrast effects, and context- dependent willingness to pay. The results suggest that well-established psychological processes – memory-based norms and attention to surprising features – are key to understanding decision-making. 1 The authors are from University of Oxford, Universita Bocconi, and Harvard University, respectively. We are grateful to Dan Benjamin, Paulo Costa, Ben Enke, Matt Gentzkow, Sam Gershman, Thomas Graeber, Michael Kahana, Spencer Kwon, George Loewenstein, Sendhil Mullainathan, Josh Schwartzstein, Jesse Shapiro, Jann Spiess, Linh To, and Pierre- Luc Vautrey for valuable comments. Shleifer thanks the Sloan Foundation and the Pershing Square Venture Fund for Research on the Foundations of Human Behavior for financial support. 1 1. Introduction Memory appears to play a central role in even the simplest choices. Consider a thirsty traveler thinking of whether to look for a shop to buy a bottle of water at the airport. He automatically retrieves from memory similar past experiences, including the pleasure of quenching his thirst and the prices he paid before, and decides based on these recollections.
    [Show full text]
  • Recessions and Recoveries
    Mark A. Wynne Nathan S. Balke Senior Economist Assistant Professor of Economics Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Southern Methodist University and Research Associate Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Recessions and Recoveries he U.S. economy entered recession in July the behavior of groups of leading, coincident, and T 1990 and began to recover, many analysts lagging indicators in the first seven months of six believe, in April or May 1991. Since then, the recoveries (the earliest being that following the economy has grown at a pace so sluggish as to be trough in July 1924, the latest being that following indistinguishable, in some ways, from continued the trough in August 1954, since revised to May recession. However, as early as spring 1991, several 1954) and tentatively concluded that “recoveries observers were expressing the opinion that the in output, employment, and profits have usually recovery from the 1990–91 recession would not been faster after severe depressions than after be particularly robust because the recession itself mild contractions” (p. 88). Moore (1965) contains was not particularly severe. For example, in Busi- a restatement of the finding that severe contractions ness Week in June 1991, Alan Blinder argued, tend to be followed by strong expansions, and “Shallow recessions are followed by weak recov- Bry and Boschan (1971) present further evidence eries for a simple reason: An economy that has on this proposition, focusing on growth in non- not fallen far has little catching up to do. And agricultural employment. catch-up
    [Show full text]
  • Modigliani's and Sylos Labini's Contributions to Oligopoly Theory
    The Origin of the Sylos Postulate: Modigliani’s and Sylos Labini’s Contributions to Oligopoly Theory by Antonella Rancan CHOPE Working Paper No. 2012-08 December 2012 The Origin of the Sylos Postulate: Modigliani’s and Sylos Labini’s Contributions to Oligopoly Theory* Antonella Rancan University of Molise (Italy) Email: [email protected] December 2012 * The paper benefited from a period of research at Duke University working on Modigliani’s Papers. I wish to thank the Hope Center and the David M. Rubenstein Rare Book, Manuscript, and Special Collections Library for financial support within the Economists’ Paper Project. I also thank the Special Collection Library staff for their kind availability. The paper was presented at the 2011 ESHET and STOREP conferences. I am especially grateful to the readers and discussants of different versions for their useful comments and suggestions. The Abstract of The Origin of the Sylos Postulate: Modigliani’s and Sylos Labini’s Contributions to Oligopoly Theory* Abstract Paolo Sylos Labini’s Oligopoly Theory and Technical Progress (1957) is considered one of the major contributions to entry-prevention models, especially after Franco Modigliani’s famous formalization. Nonetheless, Modigliani neglected Sylos Labini’s major aim when reviewing his work (1958), particularly his demonstration of the dynamic relation between industrial concentration and economic development. Modigliani addressed only Sylos’ microeconomic analysis and the determination of the long-run equilibrium price and output, concentrating on the role played by firms’ anticipations. By doing so he shifted attention from Sylos' objective analysis to a subjective approach to oligopoly problem. This paper discusses Sylos’ and Modigliani’s differing approaches, derives the origin of the Sylos postulate and sets Modigliani’s interpretation of Sylos’ oligopoly theory in the context of his 1950s research into firms’ behaviour under uncertainty.
    [Show full text]
  • From Social Control to Financial Economics: the Linked Ecologies of Economics and Business in Twentieth Century America
    Theor Soc (2013) 42:121–159 DOI 10.1007/s11186-012-9187-3 From social control to financial economics: the linked ecologies of economics and business in twentieth century America Marion Fourcade & Rakesh Khurana Published online: 27 February 2013 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Abstract This article draws on historical material to examine the co-evolution of economic science and business education over the course of the twentieth century, showing that fields evolve not only through internal struggles but also through struggles taking place in adjacent fields. More specifically, we argue that the scientific strategies of business schools played an essential—if largely invisible and poorly understood—role in major transformations in the organization and substantive direc- tion of social-scientific knowledge, and specifically economic knowledge, in twenti- eth century America. We use the Wharton School as an illustration of the earliest trends and dilemmas (ca. 1900–1930), when business schools found themselves caught between their business connections and their striving for moral legitimacy in higher education. Next, we look at the creation of the Carnegie Tech Graduate School of Industrial Administration after World War II. This episode illustrates the increas- ingly successful claims of social scientists, backed by philanthropic foundations, on business education and the growing appeal of “scientific” approaches to decision- making and management. Finally, we argue that the rise of the Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago from the 1960s onwards (and its closely related cousin at the University of Rochester) marks the decisive ascendancy of economics, and particularly financial economics, in business education over the other behavioral M.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGE J. STIGLER Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 1101 East 58Th Street, Chicago, Ill
    THE PROCESS AND PROGRESS OF ECONOMICS Nobel Memorial Lecture, 8 December, 1982 by GEORGE J. STIGLER Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 1101 East 58th Street, Chicago, Ill. 60637, USA In the work on the economics of information which I began twenty some years ago, I started with an example: how does one find the seller of automobiles who is offering a given model at the lowest price? Does it pay to search more, the more frequently one purchases an automobile, and does it ever pay to search out a large number of potential sellers? The study of the search for trading partners and prices and qualities has now been deepened and widened by the work of scores of skilled economic theorists. I propose on this occasion to address the same kinds of questions to an entirely different market: the market for new ideas in economic science. Most economists enter this market in new ideas, let me emphasize, in order to obtain ideas and methods for the applications they are making of economics to the thousand problems with which they are occupied: these economists are not the suppliers of new ideas but only demanders. Their problem is comparable to that of the automobile buyer: to find a reliable vehicle. Indeed, they usually end up by buying a used, and therefore tested, idea. Those economists who seek to engage in research on the new ideas of the science - to refute or confirm or develop or displace them - are in a sense both buyers and sellers of new ideas. They seek to develop new ideas and persuade the science to accept them, but they also are following clues and promises and explorations in the current or preceding ideas of the science.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust: Discussion of Ideas Among Legislators and Who Has to Follow the Law
    1 ANTITRUST: DISCUSSION OF IDEAS AMONG LEGISLATORS AND WHO HAS TO FOLLOW THE LAW XVIe colloque Charles Gide. 14-16 abril 2016 Strasbourg, France Author: Ana Rosado. Complutense University of Madrid, Spain [email protected] Abstract The internalization of market transactions was the strategy of the majority of American companies at the end of the nineteenth century in order to increase the productivity and to reduce costs. Until 1880 the biggest American firms internalized suppliers and since 1890 included distribution, at the same time, the entrepreneurs amassed impressive fortunes. As a result the problem of trust became a moral issue, supported by the fact that society wealth has been transferred from customers to richest men. In this context a few debates took place among the American economists: first, a theoretical debate referred to prevention of monopolization of industry; second debate about the convenience of reform of the institutions and the origins of the FTC, and finally the control of economy by states. In this paper we tried to shade light about the economic arguments for and against to restrain the power of big American companies. Keywords: Antitrust, American History of Economic Thought, Markets Imperfections, Competition and Law. JEL code: B-21; K-21; D-43 2 I. INTRODUCTION At the end of the XIX century American firms shaped their structure into multidivisional companies and some of them became trusts. Many authors began to be worried about the size that these companies had reached; one of these authors was John Bates Clark. Indeed, he gave his name to the prelude price for the Nobel Prize for Economics.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Reader in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics : Key Concepts / Edited by Geoffrey M
    A Modern Reader in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR EVOLUTIONARY POLITICAL ECONOMY Series Editor: Geoffrey M. Hodgson, University of Hertfordshire Business School, UK Mixed Economies in Europe: An Evolutionary Perspective on their Emergence, Transition and Regulation Edited by Wolfgang Blaas and John Foster The Political Economy of Diversity: Evolutionary Perspectives on Economic Order and Disorder Edited by Robert Delorme and Kurt Dopfer On Economic Institutions: Theory and Applications Edited by John Groenewegen, Christos Pitelis and Sven-Erik Sjöstrand Rethinking Economics: Markets, Technology and Economic Evolution Edited by Geoffrey M. Hodgson and Ernesto Screpanti Environment, Technology and Economic Growth: The Challenge to Sustainable Development Edited by Andrew Tylecote and Jan van der Straaten Institutions and Economic Change: New Perspectives on Markets, Firms and Technology Edited by Klaus Nielsen and Björn Johnson Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology Edited by Andrea Salanti and Ernesto Screpanti Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity Edited by Ash Amin and Jerzy Hausner Employment, Technology and Economic Needs: Theory, Evidence and Public Policy Edited by Jonathan Michie and Angelo Reati Institutions and the Evolution of Capitalism: Implications of Evolutionary Economics Edited by John Groenewegen and Jack Vromen Is Economics an Evolutionary Science? The Legacy of Thorstein Veblen Edited by Francisco Louçã and Mark Perlman Technology and Knowledge: From the Firm to Innovation Systems Edited by Pier Paolo Saviotti and Bart Nooteboom Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present Edited by Pierre Garrouste and Stavros Ioannides A Modern Reader in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics: Key Concepts Edited by Geoffrey M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Economic Growth in Postwar America 1
    More The Politics of Economic Growth in Postwar America ROBERT M. COLLINS 1 2000 3 Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright © 2000 Published by Oxford All rights reserved. No by Robert M. University Press, Inc. part of this publication Collins 198 Madison Avenue, may be reproduced, New York, New York stored in a retrieval 10016. system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, Oxford is a registered mechanical, trademark of Oxford photocopying, recording, University Press. or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Collins, Robert M. More : the politics of economic growth in postwar America / Robert M. Collins. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–19–504646–3 1. Wealth—United States—History—20th century. 2. United States—Economic policy. 3. United States—Economic conditions—1945–. 4. Liberalism—United States— History—20th Century. 5. National characteristics, American. I. Title. HC110.W4C65 2000 338.973—dc21 99–022524 Design by Adam B. Bohannon 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper For My Parents Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xiii Prologue: The Ambiguity of New Deal Economics 1 1 > The Emergence of Economic Growthmanship 17 2 > The Ascendancy of Growth Liberalism 40 3 > Growth Liberalism Comes a Cropper, 1968 68 4 > Richard Nixon’s Whig Growthmanship 98 5 > The Retreat from Growth in the 1970s 132 6 > The Reagan Revolution and Antistatist Growthmanship 166 7 > Slow Drilling in Hard Boards 214 Conclusion 233 Notes 241 Index 285 Preface bit of personal serendipity nearly three decades ago inspired this A book.
    [Show full text]
  • Galb2001.Pdf
    the essential Galbraith k John Kenneth Galbraith selected and edited by Andrea D. Williams A Mariner Original houghton mifflin company boston • new york 2001 books by john kenneth galbraith [a partial listing] American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power The Great Crash, 1929 The Affluent Society The Scotch The New Industrial State The Triumph Ambassador’s Journal Economics, Peace and Laughter Economics and the Public Purpose Money: Whence It Came, Where It Went The Age of Uncertainty Annals of an Abiding Liberal A Life in Our Times The Anatomy of Power A View from the Stands Economics in Perspective: A Critical History A Tenured Professor The Culture of Contentment A Journey Through Economic Time: A Firsthand View A Short History of Financial Euphoria The Good Society: The Humane Agenda Name-Dropping: From F.D.R. On The Essential Galbraith contents Preface vii Introduction ix Countervailing Power 1 from American Capitalism The Concept of the Conventional Wisdom 18 from The Affluent Society The Myth of Consumer Sovereignty 31 from The Affluent Society The Case for Social Balance 40 from The Affluent Society The Imperatives of Technology 55 from The New Industrial State The Technostructure 66 from The New Industrial State The General Theory of Motivation 79 from The New Industrial State Economics and the Quality of Life 90 from Economics, Peace and Laughter vi C0ntents The Proper Purpose of Economic Development 109 from Economics, Peace and Laughter The Valid Image of the Modern Economy 118 from Annals of an Abiding Liberal Power
    [Show full text]