The Role of GM-CSF Posted July 30, 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

COVID-19 CURBSIDE CONSULTS Leonard H. Calabrese, DO Tiphaine Lenfant, MD Cassandra Calabrese, DO Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Orthopedic & Rheumatologic Institute, Orthopedic & Rheumatologic Institute Department Orthopedic & Rheumatologic Institute, and Cleveland Clinic of Infectious Disease, Cleveland Clinic; Assistance Department of Infectious Disease, Cleveland Clinic Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris; Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Service de médecine interne, Paris, France Cytokine storm release syndrome and the prospects for immunotherapy with COVID-19, part 3: The role of GM-CSF Posted July 30, 2020 ■ ABSTRACT still lacking is an understanding of the precise cho- Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor reography of cytokine storm and of which cytokine (GM-CSF) has been used experimentally in patients with or cytokines are upstream drivers vs those that may acute respiratory distress syndrome. Recombinant GM- be late-stage effectors or amplifiers. While IL-6 and CSF administered by direct inhalation is currently being IL-1 are both logical therapeutic targets and the pre- studied in a cohort of patients with advanced COVID-19. liminary data from uncontrolled studies have shown promise, inhibition has not been curative and is not ■ INTRODUCTION without real safety concerns. This Curbside Consult will focus on another cytokine of growing interest, In the first two parts of this series, we focused on the GM-CSF. basic immunobiology of severe COVID-19 disease and the role of inflammatory cytokines in driving ■ BASIC IMMUNOLOGY OF GM-CSF respiratory damage, coagulopathy, end-organ failure, and death, which is idealized in Figure 1.1,2 We know GM-CSF is a complex cytokine and a member of the that 90% of patients with COVID-19 recover, but we colony-stimulating superfamily. While it does have a are also aware that in about 10% of patients the dis- role as a growth factor for myeloid cells, this is con- ease is progressive, and that this is heavily influenced sidered a lesser function compared with other cyto- by a growing number of risk factors, including atten- kines such a granulocyte-stimulating colony factor dant cardiovascular disease, obesity, hypertension, (G-CSF) and macrophage-stimulating colony factor and age. This stage 3 of COVID-19, when the disease (M-CSF), and GM-CSF is now considered a central player in the integrated immune response and a cen- may rapidly progress to fatality, has been continuously 4,5 elucidated and referred to as “cytokine storm,” given tral mediator of tissue inflammation. the presence of elevated levels of inflammatory cyto- GM-CSF is produced by both hematopoietic (eg, kines and chemokines including interleukin 1 (IL-1), T cells, B cells, macrophages, monocytes) and some IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), granulocyte- viscerosomatic cells (type II alveolar epithelial cells, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), endothelial cells, fibroblasts) and can activate cells gamma interferon, and monocyte chemotactic pro- through the dimeric GM-CSF receptor expressed tein-1 (MCP-1).2 Furthermore, quantitative studies primarily on monocytes and macrophages but also on of these biomarkers have demonstrated that some dendritic cells and other cells of the innate immune system.4,6 GM-CSF mediates its effects by signaling may discriminate mild self-limiting forms of COVID- 7 19 from severe progressive forms of the disease.3 But through the JAK-STAT pathway, a pathway inhib- ited by currently available therapeutics including tofacitinib and baricitinib. During inflammation GM- The statements and opinions expressed in COVID-19 Curbside Consults are CSF serves two important roles. First, it functions to based on experience and the available literature as of the date posted. While polarize mature myeloid cells into a pro-inflammatory we try to regularly update this content, any offered recommendations can- phenotype capable of secreting other inflammatory not be substituted for the clinical judgment of clinicians caring for individual patients. cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF, as well as a doi:10.3949/ccjm.87a.ccc057 variety of chemokines governing trafficking of hema- CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 1 Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on September 30, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. Figure 1. Three stages of COVID-19 disease. topoietic cells to areas of inflammation. GM-CSF The capacity of GM-CSF to amplify inflamma- also serves to activate dendritic cells to prime T cells tory response within the lung and its systemic effects, during antigen-specific responses and thus links the mediated by linking the release of upstream inflam- myeloid compartment and pathogenic T cells (TH-1 matory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF across and TH-17) in a positive feedback loop, capable of monocytes and macrophages and activated T cells in a propagating inflammation and tissue injury. positive feedback loop, highlight its potential impor- Of particular relevance and importance regarding tance in driving systemic inflammation and disease. the immunobiology of GM-CSF in COVID-19 disease However, as noted above, adding to the complexity is its complex role in lung homeostasis and inflam- is that GM-CSF is also a critical cytokine for healthy mation. In the healthy lung, GM-CSF has a critical pulmonary function and is necessary for the matura- role for maintaining the maturation and function of tion and maintenance of alveolar macrophages; and alveolar macrophages and surfactant metabolism5 and in some experimental models, it confers resistance to is required to maintain pulmonary function, as well viral respiratory balance, underscoring that all puta- as contributing to lung sentinel cell-mediated immu- tive inflammatory cytokines also play roles in inte- nity. GM-CSF also appears central in driving inflam- grated host defense.4 mation locally and systemically,5 and experimental The central role of GM-CSF in the inflamma- models of acute lung injury support this hypothesis, tory response and because GM-CSF appears to be demonstrating that resident alveolar macrophages upstream of other key inflammatory cytokines invites secrete a variety of inflammatory cytokines that lead targeting strategies against it in effort to down-mod- to the influx of innate cells including neutrophils, fur- ulate states of hypercytokinemia. GM-CSF levels are ther amplifying the activation of alveolar epithelial generally extremely low or undetectable in healthy cells and tissue damage.8 individuals and are detectable in blood of patients 2 CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on September 30, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission. TABLE 1 Overview of anti-GM-CSF drugs, mechanisms, and studies Mechanism of action Drug Study population Phase Healthy individuals 1 TJ003234 COVID-19 1b/2 Ankylosing spondylitis 1 Gimsilumab COVID-19 2 Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia 1 Humanized immunoglobulin G1 Lenzilumab Relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma 1/2 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody target- COVID-19 3 ing granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor (GM-CSF) Rheumatoid arthritis 2b Otilimab Inflammatory arthritis 2 COVID-19 2 Rheumatoid arthritis 2 Namilumab Chronic plaque psoriasis 2 Spondyloarthritis 2 Humanized IgG4 monoclonal Rheumatoid arthritis 2b antibody targeting GM-CSF receptor Mavrilimumab Giant cell arthritis 2 alpha COVID-19 2 Betac-receptor-specific, fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody (inhibitor CSL311 Asthma 1 of IL-3-, GM-CSF-, and IL-5-mediat- ed functions) with inflammatory manifestations of COVID-19,9 and Luca et al12 described a single-center, nonrandomized, CD14+CD16+ monocytes, a rich source of GM-CSF, prospective cohort study in which 13 non-mechan- are expanded in such patients as well.10 As noted in ically ventilated patients with pneumonia, hypoxia, Table 1, GM-CSF targeting is actively being inves- and signs of systemic inflammation were treated with tigated in a variety of autoimmune diseases and has the anti-GM-CSF receptor mavrilimumab given as been successfully studied in a mouse model of cyto- single intravenous dose. They compared this group to kine release from CAR-T cells.11 Based on these data, a cohort of 26 patients treated simultaneously with investigation of targeting GM-CSF in COVID-19 has similar baseline characteristics receiving the same commenced. standard of care without mavrilimumab. At 28 days, no patients in the anti-GM-CSF group died, whereas ■ TARGETING GM-CSF IN AUTOIMMUNE AND 7 (27%) of 26 in the control group died. The agent INFLAMMATORY DISEASES AND COVID-19 was well tolerated with no infusion reactions. There is a rich pipeline of biologic therapeutics that This study, while encouraging, is cautionary on the target GM-CSF directly or that targeting the GM- basis of its design and the inherent risks of unobserved CSF receptor, and none are currently approved for confounders. Robust trials are under way and will any indication, though they are under investigation hopefully provide more definitive evidence (Table in many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, 2). A second single-center study from Mayo Clinic released but not yet peer-reviewed also described spondyloarthritis, giant cell arteritis, psoriasis, and 13 certain malignancies (Table 1). To date, there are impressive results. In this observational noncon- 8 clinical trials
Recommended publications
  • (COVID-19) in the Era of Cardiac Vigilance: a Systematic Review

    (COVID-19) in the Era of Cardiac Vigilance: a Systematic Review

    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Repurposing Immunomodulatory Therapies against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Era of Cardiac Vigilance: A Systematic Review Courtney M. Campbell 1,* , Avirup Guha 2 , Tamanna Haque 3, Tomas G. Neilan 4 and Daniel Addison 1,5 1 Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] 2 Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; [email protected] 3 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; [email protected] 4 Cardio-Oncology Program, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02144, USA; [email protected] 5 Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 July 2020; Accepted: 8 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in efforts to identify therapies to ameliorate adverse clinical outcomes. The recognition of the key role for increased inflammation in COVID-19 has led to a proliferation of clinical trials targeting inflammation. The purpose of this review is to characterize the current state of immunotherapy trials in COVID-19, and focuses on associated cardiotoxicities, given the importance of pharmacovigilance. The search terms related to COVID-19 were queried in ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 1621 trials were identified and screened for interventional trials directed at inflammation.
  • Q3 2020 Results

    Q3 2020 Results

    Q3 2020 Results 28 October 2020 Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements This presentation may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give the Group’s current expectations or forecasts of future events. An investor can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as ‘anticipate’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘will’, ‘project’, ‘plan’, ‘believe’, ‘target’ and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective products or product approvals, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, dividend payments and financial results. Other than in accordance with its legal or regulatory obligations (including under the Market Abuse Regulations, UK Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority), the Group undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Investors should, however, consult any additional disclosures that the Group may make in any documents which it publishes and/or files with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All investors, wherever located, should take note of these disclosures. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that any particular expectation will be met and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, many of which relate to factors that are beyond the Group’s control or precise estimate.
  • Q3 2019 Results

    Q3 2019 Results

    Q3 2019 Results 30 October 2019 Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements This presentation may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give the Group’s current expectations or forecasts of future events. An investor can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as ‘anticipate’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘will’, ‘project’, ‘plan’, ‘believe’, ‘target’ and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective products or product approvals, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, dividend payments and financial results. Other than in accordance with its legal or regulatory obligations (including under the Market Abuse Regulations, UK Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority), the Group undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Investors should, however, consult any additional disclosures that the Group may make in any documents which it publishes and/or files with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All investors, wherever located, should take note of these disclosures. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that any particular expectation will be met and investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, many of which relate to factors that are beyond the Group’s control or precise estimate.
  • Inflammatory Response in Children & Adults

    Inflammatory Response in Children & Adults

    INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE IN CHILDREN & ADULTS JUNE 3, 2020 WEBINAR SERIES PARTNERS American Academy of Clinical Toxicology (AACT) American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM) American Academy of Emergency Nurse Practitioners (AAENP) American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicologists (APAMT) European Association of Poison Centers and Clinical Toxicologists (EAPCCT) Middle East & North Africa Clinical Toxicology Association (MENATOX) ON-DEMAND RESOURCES All webinars are recorded and www.acmt.net/covid19web Questions? posted to the ACMT website Write to: [email protected] Q&A will be at end of the Webinar Please type your questions into the Q&A or Chat function during the webinar and we will get to as many as we can We monitor all platforms, including YouTube and Facebook, for questions MODERATORS Paul M. Wax, MD FACMT ¡ Executive Director, American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) Ziad Kazzi, MD, FACMT ¡ Board Member, American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) ¡ President, Middle East & North Africa Clinical Toxicology Association (MENATOX) MULTISYSTEM INFLAMMATORY SYNDROME IN CHILDREN (MIS-C) MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS OF COVID-19 James Schneider, MD, FAAP, FCCP Chief, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Cohen Children’s Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY [email protected] CONFLICT OF THIS SPEAKER DOES NOT HAVE ANY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST INTEREST TO DISCLOSE Recognition of New disease?
  • Immunomodulators Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19

    Immunomodulators Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19

    Immunomodulators Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19 Last Updated: August 4, 2021 Summary Recommendations See Therapeutic Management of Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19 for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel’s (the Panel) recommendations on the use of the following immunomodulators for patients according to their disease severity: • Baricitinib with dexamethasone • Dexamethasone • Tocilizumab with dexamethasone Additional Recommendations There is insufficient evidence for the Panel to recommend either for or against the use of the following immunomodulators for the treatment of COVID-19: • Colchicine for nonhospitalized patients • Fluvoxamine • Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inhibitors for hospitalized patients • Inhaled budesonide • Interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors (e.g., anakinra) • Interferon beta for the treatment of early (i.e., <7 days from symptom onset) mild to moderate COVID-19 • Sarilumab for patients who are within 24 hours of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and who require invasive mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, or high-flow oxygen (>0.4 FiO2/30 L/min of oxygen flow) The Panel recommends against the use of the following immunomodulators for the treatment of COVID-19, except in a clinical trial: • Baricitinib with tocilizumab (AIII) • Interferons (alfa or beta) for the treatment of severely or critically ill patients with COVID-19 (AIII) • Kinase inhibitors: • Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, zanubrutinib) (AIII) • Janus kinase inhibitors other than baricitinib (e.g., ruxolitinib, tofacitinib) (AIII) • Non-SARS-CoV-2-specific intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (AIII). This recommendation should not preclude the use of IVIG when it is otherwise indicated for the treatment of complications that arise during the course of COVID-19.
  • Promising Therapeutic Targets for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Promising Therapeutic Targets for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

    REVIEW published: 09 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686155 Promising Therapeutic Targets for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis † † Jie Huang 1 , Xuekun Fu 1 , Xinxin Chen 1, Zheng Li 1, Yuhong Huang 1 and Chao Liang 1,2* 1 Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China, 2 Institute of Integrated Bioinfomedicine and Translational Science (IBTS), School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic poly-articular chronic autoimmune joint disease that mainly damages the hands and feet, which affects 0.5% to 1.0% of the population worldwide. With the sustained development of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), significant success has been achieved for preventing and relieving disease activity in RA patients. Unfortunately, some patients still show limited response to DMARDs, which puts forward new requirements for special targets and novel therapies. Understanding the pathogenetic roles of the various molecules in RA could facilitate discovery of potential therapeutic targets and approaches. In this review, both Edited by: existing and emerging targets, including the proteins, small molecular metabolites, and Trine N. Jorgensen, epigenetic regulators related to RA, are discussed, with a focus on the mechanisms that Case Western Reserve University, result in inflammation and the development of new drugs for blocking the various United States modulators in RA. Reviewed by: Åsa Andersson, Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, targets, proteins, small molecular metabolites, epigenetic regulators Halmstad University, Sweden Abdurrahman Tufan, Gazi University, Turkey *Correspondence: INTRODUCTION Chao Liang [email protected] Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is classified as a systemic poly-articular chronic autoimmune joint † disease that primarily affects hands and feet.
  • Bispecific T-Cell Redirection Versus Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cells As Approaches to Kill Cancer Cells

    Bispecific T-Cell Redirection Versus Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cells As Approaches to Kill Cancer Cells

    Bispecific T-Cell Redirection versus Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cells as Approaches to Kill Cancer Cells William R. Strohl 1,* and Michael Naso 2 1 BiStro Biotech Consulting, LLC, 1086 Tullo Farm Rd., Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA 2 Century Therapeutics, 3675 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-908-745-8576 Received: 27 May 2019; Accepted: 24 June 2019; Published: 3 July 2019 Abstract: The concepts for T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (TRBAs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells are both at least 30 years old but both platforms are just now coming into age. Two TRBAs and two CAR-T cell products have been approved by major regulatory agencies within the last ten years for the treatment of hematological cancers and an additional 53 TRBAs and 246 CAR cell constructs are in clinical trials today. Two major groups of TRBAs include small, short- half-life bispecific antibodies that include bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE®s) which require continuous dosing and larger, mostly IgG-like bispecific antibodies with extended pharmacokinetics that can be dosed infrequently. Most CAR-T cells today are autologous, although significant strides are being made to develop off-the-shelf, allogeneic CAR-based products. CAR-Ts form a cytolytic synapse with target cells that is very different from the classical immune synapse both physically and mechanistically, whereas the TRBA-induced synapse is similar to the classic immune synapse. Both TRBAs and CAR-T cells are highly efficacious in clinical trials but both also present safety concerns, particularly with cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity.
  • Cellular Immunology the Role of B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis

    Cellular Immunology the Role of B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis

    Cellular Immunology 339 (2019) 10–23 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cellular Immunology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ycimm Research paper ☆ The role of B cells in multiple sclerosis: Current and future therapies T ⁎ Austin Negrona, Rachel R. Robinsona, Olaf Stüveb,c, Thomas G. Forsthubera, a Department of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, TX 78249, USA b Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA c Neurology Section, VA North Texas Health Care System, Medical Service, Dallas, TX, USA ABSTRACT While it was long held that T cells were the primary mediators of multiple sclerosis (MS) pathogenesis, the beneficial effects observed in response to treatment with Rituximab (RTX), a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting CD20, shed light on a key contributor to MS that had been previously underappreciated: B cells. This has been reaffirmed by results from clinical trials testing the efficacy of subsequently developed B cell-depleting mAbs targeting CD20 as well as studies revisiting the effects of previous disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on B cell subsets thought to modulate disease severity. In this review, we summarize current knowledge regarding the complex roles of B cells in MS pathogenesis and current and potential future B cell-directed therapies. 1. Introduction oligoclonal bands [12–14]. However, unlike what is observed in NMO and MG, there is significant heterogeneity in the antigen specificity of The contribution of B cells to autoimmune disease pathogenesis has these oligoclonal antibodies, which may target pathogens as well as historically been viewed primarily via the production of pathogenic autoantigens [8].
  • Overview of Planned Or Ongoing Studies of Drugs for the Treatment of COVID-19

    Overview of Planned Or Ongoing Studies of Drugs for the Treatment of COVID-19

    Version of 16.06.2020 Overview of planned or ongoing studies of drugs for the treatment of COVID-19 Table of contents Antiviral drugs ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Remdesivir ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Lopinavir + Ritonavir (Kaletra) ........................................................................................................................... 7 Favipiravir (Avigan) .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Darunavir + cobicistat or ritonavir ................................................................................................................... 18 Umifenovir (Arbidol) ........................................................................................................................................ 19 Other antiviral drugs ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents ....................................................................................................... 24 Convalescent Plasma ...........................................................................................................................................
  • MRI of the Joint and Evaluation of the Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony

    MRI of the Joint and Evaluation of the Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony

    This is a repository copy of MRI of the joint and evaluation of the granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor–CCL17 axis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving otilimab: a phase 2a randomised mechanistic study. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/162810/ Version: Supplemental Material Article: Genovese, MC, Berkowitz, M, Conaghan, PG orcid.org/0000-0002-3478-5665 et al. (14 more authors) (2020) MRI of the joint and evaluation of the granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor–CCL17 axis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving otilimab: a phase 2a randomised mechanistic study. Lancet Rheumatology, 2 (11). e666- e676. ISSN 2665-9913 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30224-1 © 2020, Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary methods Protocol amendments 1.
  • GSK Announces Results Evaluating Its Investigational Monoclonal Antibody, Otilimab, for the Treatment of Hospitalised Adult Patients with COVID-19

    GSK Announces Results Evaluating Its Investigational Monoclonal Antibody, Otilimab, for the Treatment of Hospitalised Adult Patients with COVID-19

    RNS Number : 3602Q GlaxoSmithKline PLC 25 February 2021 Issued: 25 February 2021, London UK GSK announces results evaluating its investigational monoclonal antibody, otilimab, for the treatment of hospitalised adult patients with COVID-19 GlaxoSmithKline plc (LSE/NYSE: GSK)todayannouncedresults fromthephase 2 proof of concept OSCAR (Otilimabin Severe COVID-19 Related Disease) study withotilimab, an investigational anti-granulocyte macrophage colony- stimulating factor (anti-GM-CSF) monoclonal antibody. The primary endpoint of the OSCAR study was the proportion of COVID-19 patients who were alive and free of respiratory failure 28 days after treatment with a single dose of otilimab in addition to standard of care (including anti- viral treatments and corticosteroids), compared to patients being treated with standard of care alone. Data from patients of all ages showed a treatment difference of 5.3% (95% CI= -0.8%, 11.4%) but this did not reach statistical significance. However, a pre-planned efficacy analysis by age in patients 70 years and older (N=180, 806 in total study) showed that 65.1% of patients were alive and free of respiratory failure 28 days after treatment with otilimab plus standard of care, compared to 45.9% of patients who received the standard of care alone (delta of 19.1%, 95% CI=5.2%, 33.1%) (nominal p-value=0.009). In addition, in a mortality analysis up to day 60, a treatment difference of 14.4% favouring otilimab was seen with rates of 40.4% on standard of care vs. 26% on otilimab plus standard of care (95% CI= 0.9%, 27.9%) (nominal p-value=0.040) in patients 70 years and older.
  • Beyond Counting Sheep: New Strategies for Sleep Maintenance Insomnia

    Beyond Counting Sheep: New Strategies for Sleep Maintenance Insomnia

    Beyond Counting Sheep: New Strategies for Sleep Maintenance Insomnia Beyond Counting Sheep: New Strategies for Sleep Maintenance Insomnia 1 Learning Objectives • Screen patients for insomnia according to current diagnostic criteria • Identify the cause of insomnia, including psychosocial and lifestyle issues and comorbidities, to determine treatment and reduce risk factors • Individualize treatment with approved insomnia medications, including dual orexin receptor antagonists 2 2 Insomnia: Definition and Types Desired • Patient report of difficulty: wake time Sleep-maintenance ‒ Initiating sleep insomnia ‒ Maintaining sleep • Adequate opportunity and circumstances for sleep Sleep-onset • Daytime impairment insomnia Bedtime Sateia MJ. Chest. 2014;146:1387-1394; Sateia MJ, et al. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13:307-349. 3 3 2020 PCE Symposia Series 3 1 Beyond Counting Sheep: New Strategies for Sleep Maintenance Insomnia Epidemiology of Insomnia Prevalence of Insomnia Symptoms* in the US Proportion of Patients With Insomnia† Who Discuss Symptoms with HCP 2% 5% Never Never discuss 19% Rarely 33% Mention during discussion 26% of a different problem A few nights per month Specifically seek evaluation 69% A few nights per week 25% for insomnia Every night or almost 21% every night *Insomnia symptoms defined as trouble falling asleep, waking frequently at night, †Insomnia defined as having any history of difficulty sleeping waking too early and unable to fall back asleep, or waking feeling unrefreshed Ancoli-Israel S, et al. Sleep. 1999;22(suppl 2):S347-S353; Bailes S, et al. Fam Pract. 2009;26:294-300; National Sleep Foundation. www.sleepfoundation.org/professionals/sleep-america-polls/2005-adult-sleep-habits-and-styles. Accessed October 19, 2020.